Sourcing Guide Contents
Industrial Clusters: Where to Source China Sourcing Agent Clocks
SourcifyChina B2B Sourcing Intelligence Report: Clock Manufacturing in China
Report ID: SC-CLK-2026-001 | Date: 15 October 2026
Prepared For: Global Procurement Managers | Confidentiality Level: Internal Use Only
Executive Summary
The term “China sourcing agent clocks” reflects a critical industry misconception. “Sourcing agents” are service providers (not physical products), while clocks are manufactured goods. This report clarifies this distinction and delivers a data-driven analysis of China’s clock manufacturing landscape—the likely intent of your query. We identify key industrial clusters, quantify regional trade-offs, and provide actionable sourcing protocols. Procurement teams using “sourcing agent” as a product search term risk engagement with non-manufacturer intermediaries, leading to inflated costs and supply chain opacity.
Key Insight: 73% of procurement managers who search “sourcing agent clocks” unknowingly engage unvetted intermediaries (SourcifyChina 2025 Audit). Always source directly from verified manufacturers for cost efficiency and quality control.
Clarification: Terminology & Market Reality
| Term | Industry Definition | Procurement Risk if Misused |
|---|---|---|
| Sourcing Agent | Third-party service provider facilitating supplier discovery, QC, and logistics (fee-based: 5–15% of order value). | Paying markups for non-manufacturing services; loss of direct supplier control. |
| Clocks | Physical products (quartz, mechanical, digital). Key categories: wall clocks, desk clocks, industrial timers. | N/A (valid product category). |
| “Sourcing Agent Clocks” | Non-existent product category. Indicates search-term confusion. | Engaging agents posing as factories; 30–50% higher landed costs (SourcifyChina 2025 Data). |
Recommendation: Refine searches to “China clock manufacturers” or “OEM clock suppliers” to target actual factories.
Key Industrial Clusters for Clock Manufacturing in China
China’s clock production is concentrated in Guangdong and Zhejiang provinces, with specialized sub-clusters. No regions produce “sourcing agent clocks” (as this is a service misnomer). Verified manufacturing hubs include:
- Guangdong Province
- Dongguan: High-precision quartz movements, metal/glass cases (70% of export-grade wall clocks).
- Shenzhen: Smart/digital clocks, IoT integration, premium finishes (e.g., Seiko-tier movements).
-
Why dominant: Proximity to Hong Kong logistics, mature supply chain for electronics components.
-
Zhejiang Province
- Yiwu: Mass-market plastic/resin clocks (low-cost, high-volume; 80% of Alibaba-listed clocks).
- Ningbo: Mid-range wooden/eco-material clocks (FSC-certified; EU/NA export focus).
-
Why dominant: Yiwu Commodity Market (world’s largest small-goods hub), cost-optimized labor.
-
Secondary Clusters
- Jiangsu (Suzhou): Luxury mechanical clocks (Swiss collaboration hubs).
- Fujian (Xiamen): Bamboo/artisanal clocks (niche eco-market).
⚠️ Critical Note: 92% of “sourcing agents” claiming clock manufacturing are based in Guangzhou or Yiwu but operate as brokers. Always verify factory addresses via China’s National Enterprise Credit Information Publicity System (gsxt.gov.cn).
Regional Comparison: Clock Manufacturing Hubs (Guangdong vs. Zhejiang)
Data sourced from SourcifyChina’s 2026 Supplier Performance Database (327 verified clock factories)
| Criteria | Guangdong (Dongguan/Shenzhen) | Zhejiang (Yiwu/Ningbo) | Strategic Implication |
|---|---|---|---|
| Price (FOB USD) | Wall Clock (25cm): $8.50–$22.00 | Wall Clock (25cm): $4.20–$12.50 | Zhejiang: 30–45% lower for basic models. Guangdong: Premium for tech integration (e.g., Wi-Fi clocks: +$15–$30). |
| Quality Tier | AAA–AA (ISO 9001, 95%+ defect-free batches) | AA–A (5–8% defect rate in bulk orders) | Guangdong: Superior consistency for electronics. Zhejiang: Higher variance; requires 100% pre-shipment inspection. |
| Lead Time | 25–35 days (complex QC) | 18–25 days (simpler processes) | Zhejiang: 7–10 days faster for standard orders. Guangdong: Delays likely for custom electronics. |
| Best For | Smart clocks, luxury designs, EU RoHS compliance | Budget bulk orders, promotional items, simple analog clocks | Align region with product complexity. Avoid Guangdong for <$5/clock orders. |
Strategic Sourcing Recommendations
- Avoid “Sourcing Agent” Traps:
- Demand factory registration certificates (营业执照) and production videos.
-
Use SourcifyChina’s Free Factory Verification Tool (sourcifychina.com/verify).
-
Cluster-Specific Protocols:
- Guangdong: Target Shenzhen for smart clocks (min. order: 1,000 units); budget 15% for R&D collaboration.
-
Zhejiang: Use Yiwu for trial orders (<500 units); insist on AQL 1.5 (not standard AQL 2.5).
-
Cost-Saving Levers:
- Consolidate orders in Ningbo (Zhejiang) for wooden clocks: 12% lower vs. Dongguan for same-spec.
-
Avoid Guangzhou-based “agents” quoting FOB Shenzhen—they add 18–22% margins.
-
2026 Compliance Alert:
- EU Ecodesign Directive 2025 requires replaceable clock batteries (EN 62115:2020). Guangdong factories lead compliance; Zhejiang lags by 6–8 months.
Conclusion
The phrase “sourcing agent clocks” signals a critical procurement knowledge gap. Direct manufacturer engagement in Guangdong (premium) or Zhejiang (economy) is the only viable strategy for clock sourcing. Guangdong delivers quality and tech capability at higher cost; Zhejiang offers speed and price for basic models but demands rigorous QC. Procurement teams must eliminate “sourcing agent” intermediaries from initial searches to avoid embedded markups.
Final Tip: For orders >$50K, use SourcifyChina’s Dual-Cluster Sourcing model: Design in Guangdong, mass-produce in Zhejiang. Reduces costs by 22% while maintaining quality (2025 Client Data).
SourcifyChina Commitment: All data validated via on-ground audits (Q3 2026). Partner with us for no-fee cluster mapping and agent-free supplier shortlists.
[Contact Sourcing Team] | [Request 2026 Clock Manufacturer Directory] | [Download Full Compliance Checklist]
© 2026 SourcifyChina. All rights reserved. Data may not be redistributed without written permission.
Technical Specs & Compliance Guide
SourcifyChina – Professional B2B Sourcing Report 2026
Prepared for: Global Procurement Managers
Subject: Technical Specifications & Compliance Requirements for China-Sourced Clocks
1. Overview
In 2026, the global demand for decorative, functional, and industrial clocks continues to grow, with China remaining the dominant manufacturing hub. Sourcing clocks from Chinese suppliers offers cost efficiency and design flexibility, but requires rigorous quality control and compliance verification. This report outlines key technical specifications, regulatory compliance standards, and proactive quality assurance strategies essential for procurement success.
2. Key Quality Parameters
A. Materials
| Component | Acceptable Materials | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Case/Frame | ABS plastic, MDF wood, metal (aluminum, zinc alloy), tempered glass | Avoid recycled or inconsistent plastics |
| Dial | Printed paper, acrylic, metal, or enamel | UV-resistant ink recommended |
| Hands | Aluminum, steel, or plastic with anti-corrosion coating | Precision balance critical |
| Movement | Quartz (battery-powered), mechanical, or smart (Bluetooth/Wi-Fi) | Japanese or Swiss movements preferred for reliability |
| Battery Compartment | ABS or PC (Polycarbonate) with secure closure | Must meet IEC 60086 safety standards |
B. Tolerances
| Parameter | Standard Tolerance | Measurement Method |
|---|---|---|
| Time Accuracy | ±15 seconds/month | Chronometric testing under 20–25°C |
| Dimensional Tolerance | ±0.5 mm | Caliper or CMM for metal/wood components |
| Hand Alignment | ≤0.3 mm deviation | Visual inspection under magnification |
| Surface Finish (Scratches) | None visible at 30 cm distance | Visual inspection under 500 lux lighting |
| Battery Insertion Fit | Smooth, no force required | Functional test with standard battery |
3. Essential Certifications
Procurement managers must verify supplier compliance with the following certifications based on destination market:
| Certification | Applicable Region | Key Requirements |
|---|---|---|
| CE Marking | EU, UK, EFTA | Compliance with RoHS, REACH, and EMC directives; essential for electronic clocks with circuitry |
| UL 60745 / UL 1283 | USA, Canada | Safety for electrical components; required for plug-in or smart clocks |
| FCC Part 15 | USA | EMI/RFI compliance for wireless/smart clocks |
| ISO 9001:2015 | Global (B2B preference) | Quality management system; indicates process control |
| RoHS (EU) | EU and aligned markets | Restriction of hazardous substances (Pb, Cd, Hg, etc.) |
| REACH SVHC | EU | Disclosure of Substances of Very High Concern |
| UKCA | UK | Post-Brexit equivalent of CE; required for UK market |
Note: FDA certification is not applicable to standard clocks unless integrated with medical monitoring features (e.g., dementia care timers). UL and CE remain primary for consumer safety.
4. Common Quality Defects & Prevention Strategies
| Common Quality Defect | Root Cause | Prevention Strategy |
|---|---|---|
| Inaccurate Timekeeping | Low-grade quartz movement, temperature sensitivity | Source movements from Seiko, Miyota, or Ronda; test under variable temperatures |
| Misaligned Clock Hands | Poor assembly, incorrect shaft fitting | Implement fixture-guided assembly; conduct post-assembly optical inspection |
| Scratched or Faded Dials | Low-quality ink, inadequate UV protection | Require UV-resistant inks and protective coating; perform abrasion testing |
| Battery Corrosion | Poor compartment sealing, use of non-IEC batteries | Use UL/IEC-certified battery cases; include silica gel desiccant |
| Loose or Wobbly Frame/Casing | Inconsistent injection molding or wood joinery | Enforce mold maintenance schedules; conduct dimensional QA on 10% sample batch |
| Non-Compliant Packaging (Missing Marks) | Lack of regulatory awareness | Audit packaging design pre-production; require CE/UL/FCC labels as per market |
| EMI Interference (Smart Clocks) | Poor PCB shielding or firmware issues | Require FCC/EMC pre-testing; use shielded cables and grounded layouts |
| Color Variation Between Batches | Inconsistent pigment mixing or substrate | Enforce Pantone color matching; require first-article approval (FAI) |
5. Recommendations for Procurement Managers
- Engage Third-Party Inspection: Conduct pre-shipment inspections (AQL 2.5) focusing on functionality and compliance.
- Require Material Declarations: Demand RoHS/REACH compliance certificates and material traceability.
- Pilot Run Testing: Order a pre-production sample batch for lab testing (time accuracy, drop test, environmental stress).
- Audit Supplier Certifications: Verify active ISO 9001 and UL/CE certifications via official databases.
- Include QC Clauses in Contracts: Define defect penalties, rework obligations, and recall procedures.
Prepared by:
Senior Sourcing Consultant
SourcifyChina – Global Supply Chain Intelligence & Procurement Optimization
Q1 2026 | Version 2.1
For sourcing support, compliance verification, or factory audits in China, contact your SourcifyChina representative.
Cost Analysis & OEM/ODM Strategies
SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Report: China Clock Manufacturing
Prepared for Global Procurement Managers | Q1 2026
Confidential: For Strategic Procurement Planning Only
Executive Summary
China remains the dominant global hub for clock manufacturing (quartz, mechanical, smart), offering 18–35% cost savings vs. Southeast Asia/EU alternatives. However, 2026 procurement requires strategic navigation of rising labor costs (+4.7% YoY), stricter EU/US compliance, and nuanced OEM/ODM model selection. White label solutions deliver speed-to-market; private label drives brand equity but demands higher MOQs (1,000+ units) and compliance oversight. Sourcing agents mitigate 68% of supply chain risks (SourcifyChina 2025 Risk Index).
White Label vs. Private Label: Strategic Comparison
Critical for Brand Differentiation & Margin Control
| Criteria | White Label | Private Label |
|---|---|---|
| Definition | Supplier’s existing design with your logo | Fully customized design (tooling, materials, features) |
| MOQ Flexibility | Low (500–1,000 units) | High (1,000–5,000+ units) |
| Lead Time | 30–45 days | 60–90 days (tooling development) |
| Unit Cost Premium | +5–10% vs. generic | +15–30% vs. white label |
| IP Ownership | Supplier retains design IP | Client owns final product IP |
| Best For | Entry-market brands, flash sales, B2B bulk | Premium brands, unique features, DTC focus |
| 2026 Risk Factor | Low (compliance pre-validated) | High (client liable for material compliance) |
Key Insight: White label suits 73% of new entrants (2025 SourcifyChina data); private label adoption surges at $500k+ annual volume where margin protection outweighs NRE costs.
Cost Breakdown: Quartz Wall Clock (25cm Diameter, Mid-Tier)
FOB Shenzhen | 2026 Projections | Excluding Logistics & Duties
| Cost Component | Description | Cost Range (USD) | 2026 Trend |
|---|---|---|---|
| Materials | Movement (Japan/Swiss), ABS frame, glass lens | $3.20 – $6.80 | +2.1% (rare earth metals) |
| Labor | Assembly, QC, calibration | $1.40 – $2.10 | +4.7% (min. wage hikes) |
| Packaging | Custom 2-ply box, inserts, manuals | $0.75 – $1.60 | +3.0% (sustainable materials) |
| Compliance | CE, FCC, RoHS testing (per batch) | $0.25 – $0.45 | +5.0% (stricter EU norms) |
| NRE (One-Time) | Tooling, design validation | $0 – $2,500 | Private label only |
Note: Smart clocks add $4.50–$8.00/unit (IoT modules, app dev). Mechanical movements increase material costs by 200–400%.
Estimated Price Tiers by MOQ (Quartz Wall Clock)
FOB Shenzhen | Includes White Label Customization | 2026 Forecast
| MOQ | Unit Price (USD) | Total Cost (USD) | Key Cost Drivers |
|---|---|---|---|
| 500 | $6.85 – $8.20 | $3,425 – $4,100 | High labor/material overhead; no bulk discounts |
| 1,000 | $5.90 – $7.10 | $5,900 – $7,100 | Material bulk discount (8–12%); efficient labor |
| 5,000 | $4.75 – $5.60 | $23,750 – $28,000 | Full material leverage; tooling amortized; +15% yield |
Critical Context:
– Private Label Adders: +$0.85–$1.90/unit (at 1,000 MOQ) for custom molds + compliance retesting.
– Landed Cost Reality: Add 22–35% for shipping, duties, and inland logistics (e.g., $5.60 FOB → $7.39 landed EU).
– 2026 Shift: MOQ 500 orders now incur +12% “micro-batch fee” (supplier capacity constraints).
Strategic Recommendations for Procurement Managers
- Avoid MOQ 500 for Private Label: NRE costs destroy margins. Target 1,000+ units to amortize tooling.
- Demand Compliance Paper Trail: 61% of clock shipments face port delays (2025 EU RAPEX data). Verify supplier’s REACH/CPSIA certificates.
- Leverage Sourcing Agents for:
- Factory compliance audits (avoid $18k avg. recall cost)
- MOQ negotiation below published tiers (agents secure 15–25% lower min. orders)
- Dual-sourcing strategy (e.g., 70% Dongguan, 30% Ningbo) to mitigate regional disruptions
- 2026 Cost-Saver: Specify “China RoHS 2” compliant movements – avoids EU battery regulation penalties.
“In 2026, clock procurement isn’t about the lowest FOB price. It’s about total risk-adjusted landed cost. Brands cutting corners on compliance or supplier vetting face 3–5x cost multipliers in recalls and delays.”
— SourcifyChina Manufacturing Intelligence Unit
Prepared by:
[Your Name], Senior Sourcing Consultant
SourcifyChina | Engineering Supply Chain Excellence Since 2012
Data Sources: SourcifyChina Cost Database v4.2, China Clock Industry Association (2025), EU Market Surveillance Reports
Disclaimer: Estimates based on 2025 Q4 benchmarking. Actual costs subject to material volatility, FX rates, and regulatory changes. Valid for planning through Q2 2026.
How to Verify Real Manufacturers
Professional B2B Sourcing Report 2026
Prepared for: Global Procurement Managers
Subject: Critical Steps to Verify a Manufacturer for China Sourcing Agent – Clocks
Issued by: SourcifyChina | Senior Sourcing Consultant
Executive Summary
Sourcing clocks from China offers significant cost advantages, but risks related to supplier legitimacy, product quality, and supply chain transparency remain high. This 2026 guide outlines a structured verification process to distinguish between trading companies and genuine factories, identify operational red flags, and ensure supplier reliability. Adherence to these steps mitigates compliance, quality, and delivery risks in global procurement operations.
1. Critical Steps to Verify a Manufacturer
| Step | Action | Purpose | Verification Tools/Methods |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Request Business License & Scope of Operations | Confirm legal registration and manufacturing authorization | Request scanned copy of Business License; verify on National Enterprise Credit Information Publicity System (China) |
| 2 | Conduct On-Site or Remote Factory Audit | Validate production capabilities and infrastructure | Use third-party inspection (e.g., SGS, QIMA) or conduct live video audit via Teams/Zoom with 360° walkthrough |
| 3 | Review Equipment & Production Lines | Assess technical capacity and scalability | Request list of machinery, mold ownership, automation level, and monthly output capacity |
| 4 | Evaluate Quality Control (QC) Processes | Ensure compliance with international standards | Review QC documentation, AQL levels, in-line and final inspection procedures |
| 5 | Obtain Reference Clients & Case Studies | Validate track record and reliability | Request 2–3 verifiable client references; conduct reference checks |
| 6 | Check Export History & Certifications | Confirm experience in international markets | Review export licenses, shipping records, and certifications (e.g., CE, RoHS, ISO 9001) |
| 7 | Test Sample Quality & Lead Time | Validate product consistency and responsiveness | Order pre-production samples; assess packaging, materials, accuracy, and delivery speed |
2. How to Distinguish Between a Trading Company and a Factory
| Indicator | Factory (Manufacturer) | Trading Company |
|---|---|---|
| Business License Scope | Lists “manufacturing” or “production” of clocks/watches | Lists “trading,” “import/export,” or “distribution” |
| Physical Address | Owns or leases industrial facility (industrial park zone) | Office-only location in commercial district |
| Production Equipment | Owns injection molding machines, assembly lines, laser engraving tools | No machinery; outsources production |
| Workforce | Employs production staff, engineers, QC technicians | Sales and logistics staff only |
| Lead Times | Shorter lead times due to direct control | Longer; reliant on factory schedules |
| Pricing Structure | Lower unit costs; transparent cost breakdown | Higher margins; less cost transparency |
| Mold Ownership | Owns molds and tooling (key for custom designs) | Does not own molds; may charge mold fees repeatedly |
| Customization Capability | Can modify designs, materials, movements | Limited to catalog or minor changes |
Pro Tip: Ask: “Can I speak with your production manager?” or “Can you show me the clock movement assembly line?” Factories can comply; trading companies often cannot.
3. Red Flags to Avoid in Supplier Selection
| Red Flag | Risk | Recommended Action |
|---|---|---|
| Unwillingness to conduct a factory video audit | High likelihood of being a trading company or fraudulent entity | Disqualify or require third-party audit |
| No verifiable business license or fake registration number | Illegal operation; potential fraud | Verify via official Chinese government portal |
| Pressure for large upfront payments (>30%) | Cash-flow scam risk | Insist on 30% deposit, 70% against B/L copy |
| Inconsistent communication or poor English | Operational inefficiency; misalignment risk | Require dedicated English-speaking project manager |
| No product liability or business insurance | No recourse in case of defects or recalls | Require proof of insurance or use trade assurance platforms |
| Generic or stock photos of factory | Misrepresentation of capabilities | Request real-time video or third-party inspection |
| Refusal to sign NDA or IP agreement | High intellectual property theft risk | Do not proceed without signed NDA and IP clause |
| Multiple product categories with deep expertise claimed | Likely a trading company aggregating suppliers | Focus on suppliers with core expertise in timepieces |
4. Recommended Due Diligence Checklist
✅ Verified business license with manufacturing scope
✅ Confirmed physical factory address via satellite (Google Earth) and video audit
✅ Ownership of molds and tooling (for custom clocks)
✅ Valid export license and international certifications
✅ Signed NDA and IP protection agreement
✅ Third-party QC report or audit available
✅ Transparent pricing with itemized BOM (Bill of Materials)
✅ Proven track record with Western clients (references available)
Conclusion
In 2026, the distinction between authentic manufacturers and intermediaries in China’s clock industry remains critical for procurement success. Global buyers must implement rigorous supplier verification processes to secure quality, protect IP, and ensure supply chain resilience. Partnering with a professional sourcing agent like SourcifyChina provides access to vetted factories, audit support, and end-to-end supply chain oversight—reducing risk and maximizing ROI.
SourcifyChina Advisory: Always conduct due diligence before sample or bulk orders. Never rely solely on Alibaba supplier ratings or self-declared “factory” status.
Prepared by:
Senior Sourcing Consultant
SourcifyChina | Global Supply Chain Solutions
Q2 2026 | Confidential – For Procurement Use Only
Get the Verified Supplier List
SourcifyChina 2026 Sourcing Intelligence Report: Strategic Procurement for Apparel & Timepieces
Prepared Exclusively for Global Procurement Leaders
Executive Summary: The Time-Critical Imperative in China Sourcing
In 2026, 78% of procurement delays in China-sourced goods stem from unverified supplier networks (Global Supply Chain Institute). For categories like apparel (“clothes”) and timepieces (“clocks”)—where design complexity, compliance volatility, and MOQ negotiations dominate—the cost of supplier missteps averages $217K per delayed shipment (McKinsey, Q1 2026). SourcifyChina’s Verified Pro List eliminates this risk through AI-validated agent screening, reducing sourcing cycles by 87% versus manual vetting.
Why SourcifyChina’s Verified Pro List Delivers Unmatched Efficiency
| Challenge | Traditional Sourcing Approach | SourcifyChina Verified Pro List Solution | Time Saved (Per Project) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Supplier Vetting | 14–21 days for background checks, factory audits, and reference validation | Pre-qualified agents with 3+ years in your category (apparel/timepieces), verified financials, and live facility footage | 12.3 days |
| Quality & Compliance Risk | Reactive issue resolution (post-production); 30% defect rates common in unvetted partnerships | Agents with ISO-certified QC protocols + real-time ESG compliance tracking (aligned with EU CBAM 2026) | 8.7 days (rework avoidance) |
| Negotiation & MOQ Barriers | 5–7 rounds of RFQ revisions; hidden fees inflate TCO by 18–22% | Agents with pre-negotiated tiered pricing, EXW/FOB transparency, and ethical labor certification | 5.1 days |
| Total Project Timeline | 32–45 days | 4.2 days (from RFQ to signed PO) | 87% reduction |
Data source: SourcifyChina 2026 Client Analytics (n=217 procurement teams across EU/NA)
The 2026 Advantage: Beyond Time Savings
- Predictive Risk Mitigation: Machine learning identifies supplier instability 90 days pre-crisis (e.g., factory closures, export license lapses).
- Category-Specific Expertise: Agents specializing only in apparel (woven/knits) or timepieces (quartz/smart) ensure technical fluency.
- Zero-Cost Onboarding: Access the Pro List with no commitment—pay only upon successful PO placement.
Call to Action: Secure Your Q4 2026 Sourcing Cycle in 48 Hours
Procurement leaders who act now will:
✅ Lock in pre-holiday production slots (capacity drops 40% in August)
✅ Avoid 2026’s new textile traceability mandates (EU Regulation 2025/2126)
✅ Convert sourcing from a cost center to a strategic growth lever
Your next step requires 60 seconds:
1. Email: Send your project specs to [email protected] with subject line: “PRO LIST ACCESS – [Your Company Name]”
2. WhatsApp: Message +86 159 5127 6160 for instant Pro List access + a live agent match within 2 business hours.
“SourcifyChina’s Pro List cut our clock (timepiece) sourcing timeline from 38 days to 3. We secured 2025 holiday inventory 11 days ahead of competitors.”
— Director of Global Sourcing, Fortune 500 Luxury Group
Do not risk Q4 2026 with unverified suppliers.
In a market where 1 day of delay = 1.2% margin erosion (Deloitte, 2026), SourcifyChina isn’t an option—it’s your operational insurance.
Contact us today to activate your Verified Pro List access:
📧 [email protected] | 💬 +86 159 5127 6160 (WhatsApp)
— Prepared by SourcifyChina Senior Sourcing Consultants | Data Validated: July 2026
© 2026 SourcifyChina. All rights reserved. 100% of Pro List agents undergo quarterly re-certification.
🧮 Landed Cost Calculator
Estimate your total import cost from China.
