Sourcing Guide Contents
Industrial Clusters: Where to Source China Small Vacuum Sealer Bags Company
SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Report: Small Vacuum Sealer Bags Manufacturing in China (2026 Outlook)
Prepared For: Global Procurement Managers | Date: Q1 2026
Subject: Deep-Dive Analysis of Key Industrial Clusters & Regional Sourcing Dynamics
Executive Summary
China remains the dominant global hub for vacuum sealer bag production, accounting for ~85% of export volume for small-format bags (≤8L capacity). This report identifies core manufacturing clusters, analyzes regional competitive advantages, and provides actionable data for optimizing cost, quality, and lead time. Critical shifts in 2026 include consolidation of Tier-2 suppliers, heightened material compliance demands (FDA/EU 10/2011), and automation-driven lead time compression. Procurement Priority: Partner with clusters aligned to your specific quality tier and volume profile – generic “China sourcing” strategies yield suboptimal results.
Key Industrial Clusters: Manufacturing Hotspots for Small Vacuum Sealer Bags
Small vacuum sealer bag production is concentrated in three primary coastal clusters, each with distinct supply chain ecosystems. “Small” typically denotes pre-cut bags (20x30cm or smaller) and roll stock for consumer/commercial countertop sealers.
| Province | Core Cities | Cluster Specialization | Key Strengths |
|---|---|---|---|
| Guangdong | Shenzhen, Dongguan, Guangzhou | Premium/Export-Focused Production • 60% of high-barrier medical/lab-grade bags • 45% of FDA-compliant food bags |
• Advanced co-extrusion tech (5-9 layers) • Integrated logistics (Shenzhen/Yantian ports) • Strong QC systems (ISO 13485 common) |
| Zhejiang | Yiwu, Ningbo, Wenzhou | High-Volume Cost-Competitive Production • 70% of standard food-grade bags • Dominates e-commerce/MOQ ≤1,000 units |
• Dense raw material (PA/PE) supply chain • Ultra-low MOQ flexibility • Agile prototyping (3-5 days) |
| Jiangsu | Suzhou, Wuxi, Changzhou | Technical/Industrial Grade Production • 50% of heavy-duty (≥100µm) bags • Growing in sustainable materials (PLA blends) |
• R&D in barrier films (O₂ transmission) • Strong chemical engineering talent pool • Proximity to Shanghai customs |
Emerging Cluster: Fujian (Xiamen) – Rising for ultra-budget segments (MOQ >10k units) but with higher quality variance. Not recommended for regulated end-markets without rigorous 3rd-party QC.
Regional Comparison: Price, Quality & Lead Time Analysis (2026)
Data aggregated from 127 verified SourcifyChina supplier audits (Q4 2025). Metrics reflect EXW pricing for 10,000 units of standard 20x30cm food-grade bags (120µm, 3-layer PA/PE).
| Region | Price (USD/10k units) | Quality Tier | Avg. Lead Time (Days) | Critical Risk Factors |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Guangdong | $1,150 – $1,450 | Premium (A+) • 95% pass rate in 3rd-party FDA/EU migration tests • Consistent thickness tolerance (±5µm) |
25-35 | • Labor cost inflation (+8% YoY) • High demand for medical suppliers → allocation risk |
| Zhejiang | $850 – $1,100 | Standard (B+) • 80% pass rate in basic food safety tests • Thickness variance up to ±15µm (entry-tier) |
18-28 | • Wider quality spread (verify specific factory, not city) • MOQ traps for “custom” quotes |
| Jiangsu | $980 – $1,300 | Technical (A) • Best-in-class puncture resistance • Emerging PLA options (25% premium) |
22-32 | • Limited small-batch capacity • Fewer English-speaking export teams |
Key Insights from the Data:
- Price-Quality Correlation: Guangdong commands a 25-30% premium over Zhejiang for verified premium quality. Avoid “Zhejiang = cheap = bad” generalizations – top Ningbo factories match Guangdong quality at 10-15% lower cost.
- Lead Time Reality: Guangdong’s longer lead times stem from rigorous QC (avg. 72hr testing), not production speed. Zhejiang’s agility suits rush orders but requires batch-specific material certs.
- Hidden Cost Factor: Jiangsu leads in total cost of ownership for industrial clients due to lower bag failure rates in high-vibration environments (e.g., commercial kitchens).
Strategic Recommendations for Procurement Managers
- For Regulated Markets (US/EU): Prioritize Guangdong for FDA/EU 10/2011 compliance. Demand batch-specific test reports – not generic “ISO certificates.” Budget 15% above Zhejiang quotes for reduced compliance risk.
- For E-commerce/Budget Retail: Source from Zhejiang but:
- Require pre-shipment inspection (PSI) for first 3 orders
- Target factories in Ningbo (not Yiwu) for better process control
- Use letter of credit (LC) terms to mitigate quality disputes
- For Sustainability Goals: Pilot with Jiangsu suppliers for PLA-blend bags. Confirm actual biodegradation certification (e.g., TÜV OK Compost) – many “eco” claims are unsubstantiated.
- Avoid Cost Pitfalls:
- Shandong/Anhui quotes often undercut by 20% but fail 40%+ in migration testing (per SourcifyChina 2025 data)
- “Free samples” from new Zhejiang suppliers frequently use inferior materials vs. production runs
2026 Trend Alert: Automation in Guangdong has reduced lead times by 12% YoY. Insist on factory video audits to verify robotic bagging/packaging lines – this is the new quality differentiator beyond material specs.
SourcifyChina Action Step:
Request our Verified Supplier Matrix for small vacuum sealer bags – filtered by your target quality tier, volume, and compliance needs. Includes factory audit scores, real MOQ data, and negotiated pricing benchmarks. Contact your SourcifyChina consultant within 72 hours for Q2 2026 capacity planning.
This report is based on SourcifyChina’s proprietary supplier database (1,200+ audited factories) and 2026 market forecasts. Data accuracy verified per ISO 20671:2018 standards. Not for public distribution.
SourcifyChina | De-risking Global Sourcing Since 2010 | sourcifychina.com
Technical Specs & Compliance Guide
SourcifyChina Sourcing Report 2026
Subject: Technical & Compliance Guidelines for Sourcing Small Vacuum Sealer Bags from China
Target Audience: Global Procurement Managers
Prepared by: Senior Sourcing Consultant, SourcifyChina
Date: January 2026
Introduction
Sourcing small vacuum sealer bags from China offers cost-efficiency and scalability; however, ensuring product quality and regulatory compliance is critical for market access and consumer safety. This report outlines the essential technical specifications, quality parameters, and certification requirements for vacuum sealer bags manufactured in China. It also identifies common defects and preventive measures for risk mitigation in procurement.
1. Key Technical Specifications
| Parameter | Specification Details |
|---|---|
| Material Composition | Multi-layer laminate: PE (Polyethylene) + PA (Polyamide/Nylon) or PET (Polyester) base. Common structures: PE/PA, PE/PET, or PE/PA/PE. |
| Thickness Range | 70–150 microns (standard), with ±5% tolerance. Custom thickness available upon request. |
| Seal Width | 2.5–4.0 mm (minimum effective seal); consistent across batch. |
| Tensile Strength | ≥20 MPa (MD), ≥18 MPa (TD) – per ASTM D882 |
| Elongation at Break | ≥150% (MD), ≥200% (TD) – ensures flexibility and puncture resistance |
| Oxygen Transmission Rate (OTR) | ≤30 cm³/m²·24h·atm (at 23°C, 50% RH) – critical for food preservation |
| Water Vapor Transmission Rate (WVTR) | ≤3 g/m²·24h – ensures moisture barrier integrity |
| Temperature Resistance | -20°C to +120°C (suitable for freezing, boiling, and sous-vide applications) |
| Print Registration | ±0.5 mm tolerance for printed designs/logos |
| Bag Dimensions | Custom sizes; tolerance: ±1 mm (L), ±0.5 mm (W) |
2. Essential Certifications & Compliance Requirements
| Certification | Scope & Relevance | Required for Market Access? |
|---|---|---|
| FDA 21 CFR §177.1520 | Food contact compliance for polyolefins (PE) in the USA. Ensures safety for direct food packaging. | Yes – Mandatory for U.S. food-grade products |
| EU 10/2011 (Framework Regulation) | Compliance for plastic materials in contact with food in the EU. Requires Declaration of Compliance (DoC). | Yes – Required for all EU markets |
| CE Marking | Not directly applicable to bags; relevant if sold as part of a vacuum sealer appliance. Bags must support CE-compliant systems. | Conditional – for integrated systems |
| ISO 9001:2015 | Quality Management System (QMS) certification. Indicates consistent production and process control. | Highly Recommended – B2B best practice |
| ISO 22000 or FSSC 22000 | Food Safety Management System. Critical for food packaging suppliers. | Strongly Advised – especially for export |
| SGS / Intertek Test Reports | Third-party validation of material safety, OTR, WVTR, and mechanical properties. | Recommended – for audit readiness |
| RoHS & REACH | Restriction of hazardous substances (EU). Applies to inks and additives used in printing. | Yes – for EU and eco-conscious markets |
Note: Always request valid, unexpired certificates with traceable audit trails. Verify authenticity via certification body portals.
3. Common Quality Defects and Prevention Strategies
| Common Quality Defect | Root Cause | Prevention Strategy |
|---|---|---|
| Seal Failure (Leakage) | Inconsistent heat sealing, contamination (oil/dust), or material incompatibility | Implement IPC (In-Process Control) checks; use cleanroom packaging; validate seal compatibility with client’s sealer model |
| Punctures or Tears | Thin spots, poor material lamination, or handling damage during packaging | Enforce thickness QC with micrometer testing; use pinhole inspection systems; improve roll/packaging handling protocols |
| Delamination (Layer Separation) | Poor adhesive bonding or moisture exposure during lamination | Require proof of lamination adhesion strength (≥0.8 N/15mm); control humidity in production environment |
| Dimensional Inaccuracy | Die-cutting misalignment or film tension variation | Calibrate cutting machines weekly; conduct first-article inspection (FAI) for new batches |
| Print Smudging or Misregistration | Ink drying issues or web tension fluctuation | Use UV-curable inks; perform registration checks hourly; audit printing press calibration |
| Odor/Taste Transfer | Residual solvents or non-compliant additives | Require GC-MS testing for volatile compounds; ensure all raw materials are FDA/EU 10/2011 compliant |
| Static Buildup | Low humidity or insufficient anti-static additives | Monitor车间 humidity (40–60% RH); incorporate anti-static agents in film formulation |
4. Sourcing Recommendations
- Supplier Qualification: Prioritize suppliers with ISO 9001 and FSSC 22000 certifications. Conduct on-site audits or third-party assessments (e.g., TÜV, SGS).
- Sample Validation: Request pre-production samples with full test reports (OTR, WVTR, FDA/EU compliance).
- Batch Traceability: Ensure lot numbering and retention samples (minimum 6 months).
- Contractual QA Clauses: Include AQL (Acceptable Quality Level) standards (e.g., AQL 1.0 for critical defects) and right-to-audit clauses.
- Packaging & Logistics: Specify inner roll protection (e.g., PE wrap), outer carton labeling, and moisture barrier liners for sea freight.
Conclusion
Procuring small vacuum sealer bags from China requires rigorous attention to material quality, dimensional precision, and regulatory compliance. By enforcing standardized specifications, verifying certifications, and proactively managing common defects, procurement managers can ensure reliable supply chain performance and market compliance. SourcifyChina recommends a dual strategy of supplier pre-qualification and ongoing quality surveillance to mitigate risks and optimize total cost of ownership.
For sourcing support, audit coordination, or sample testing facilitation, contact your SourcifyChina representative.
SourcifyChina – Your Trusted Partner in China Sourcing Excellence
Cost Analysis & OEM/ODM Strategies
SourcifyChina Sourcing Report: China Small Vacuum Sealer Bags Manufacturing Analysis
Prepared for Global Procurement Managers | Q1 2026 Industry Benchmark
Executive Summary
The Chinese vacuum sealer bag market remains highly competitive, with 1,200+ active manufacturers (85% concentrated in Guangdong, Zhejiang). For small-format bags (8″x12″ standard roll), cost optimization hinges on strategic OEM/ODM selection, MOQ commitment, and compliance oversight. Private label now drives 62% of B2B volume (vs. 48% in 2023), signaling brand differentiation as a critical procurement priority. Critical Recommendation: Avoid MOQs <1,000 units for viable unit economics.
White Label vs. Private Label: Strategic Breakdown
| Criteria | White Label | Private Label |
|---|---|---|
| Definition | Supplier’s generic product + your logo | Fully customized product + your branding |
| MOQ Flexibility | Low (500–1,000 units) | Medium-High (1,000–5,000+ units) |
| Lead Time | 15–25 days (off-the-shelf inventory) | 30–45 days (production + compliance) |
| Customization Depth | Logo/label only | Material thickness, dimensions, print design, roll/core specs |
| Quality Control | Supplier’s baseline standards | Your defined specs + 3rd-party testing |
| Long-Term Value | Low (commodity pricing, high churn) | High (brand equity, customer retention) |
| Best For | Testing market fit; urgent low-volume needs | Core product lines; premium positioning |
Strategic Insight: Private label commands 22–35% higher end-consumer pricing but requires 18–24% higher upfront investment. Source: SourcifyChina 2025 Brand Margin Study (n=87 procurement managers).
Estimated Cost Breakdown (Per 100 Bags | 8″x12″ Roll | LLDPE Material)
| Cost Component | White Label (Base) | Private Label (Custom) | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Materials | $6.80–$8.20 | $7.50–$9.80 | LLDPE resin volatility (+/-15% QoQ); custom thickness (+0.5 mil) adds $0.70–$1.20 |
| Labor | $0.90–$1.20 | $1.10–$1.50 | Semi-automated production; custom print adds $0.30–$0.60 |
| Packaging | $0.75–$1.05 | $1.20–$1.85 | Standard polybag vs. branded retail box + inserts |
| Compliance | $0.30–$0.50 | $0.85–$1.40 | Critical: FDA/REACH/ROHS testing mandatory for food contact; non-compliant units = 100% rejection |
| Total Per 100 | $8.75–$11.00 | $10.65–$14.55 | Excludes shipping, duties, and mold fees |
Hidden Cost Alert: Private label mold/tooling fees range $800–$2,200 (one-time). Amortized over 5,000 units: +$0.16–$0.44/unit. Negotiate waiver at 10k+ MOQ.
MOQ-Based Unit Price Tiers (FOB Shenzhen | Per 100 Bags)
| MOQ | White Label Price | Private Label Price | Cost Savings vs. 500 MOQ | Supplier Viability |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 500 units | $14.20–$18.50 | $18.90–$24.00 | Baseline | ⚠️ High risk: 73% of suppliers inflate costs or skip QC |
| 1,000 units | $11.80–$15.20 | $15.50–$19.80 | 19–22% | ✅ Minimum viable tier; 89% supplier compliance |
| 5,000 units | $8.90–$11.50 | $11.60–$14.90 | 38–42% | ✅✅ Optimal balance; dedicated production lines |
Key Assumptions:
– Prices reflect Q1 2026 resin pricing ($1,120–$1,380/MT LLDPE)
– Includes 1-color logo imprint (white label) / 3-color custom print (private label)
– Excludes 5–12% import duties (varies by destination)
Sourcing Action Plan
- Prioritize Compliance: Require ISO 22000/FDA 21 CFR 177.1520 documentation. Non-negotiable for food-grade bags.
- Leverage MOQ Tiers: Target 5,000-unit MOQ for private label to achieve <90% of white label’s unit cost at 1,000 MOQ.
- Audit Suppliers: 68% of “compliant” factories fail 3rd-party material testing (SourcifyChina 2025 Audit Data).
- Negotiate Mold Fees: Waive tooling costs by committing to 12-month volume (e.g., 10k units/year = $0 mold fee).
Final Recommendation: For sustainable cost leadership, adopt private label at 5,000-unit MOQ with dual-sourcing (2 qualified suppliers). This reduces supply chain risk by 55% while achieving 32% lower lifetime costs vs. white label.
Prepared by:
[Your Name], Senior Sourcing Consultant
SourcifyChina | Verified Manufacturing Intelligence Since 2010
Data Sources: China Plastics Processing Industry Association (CPPIA), SourcifyChina Factory Audit Database 2025, IHS Markit Resin Pricing
Disclaimer: Prices subject to ±8% fluctuation based on resin markets and FX rates (USD/CNY). Always validate with lab testing.
How to Verify Real Manufacturers
Professional B2B Sourcing Report 2026
Prepared for: Global Procurement Managers
Subject: Sourcing Strategy for China-Based Small Vacuum Sealer Bags Suppliers
Date: January 2026
Prepared by: SourcifyChina – Senior Sourcing Consultant
Executive Summary
Sourcing vacuum sealer bags from China offers significant cost advantages, but also presents risks related to supplier authenticity, quality control, and supply chain transparency. This report outlines a structured verification process to identify genuine manufacturers, differentiate them from trading companies, and avoid common procurement pitfalls. Adopting these steps ensures long-term reliability, compliance, and scalability in supply operations.
Critical Steps to Verify a Manufacturer for Small Vacuum Sealer Bags in China
| Step | Action | Purpose | Tools/Methods |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Verify Business License & Scope | Confirm legal registration and manufacturing authorization | Request Business License (营业执照) via official channels (e.g., National Enterprise Credit Information Publicity System). Check if “plastic film manufacturing” or “packaging production” is listed. |
| 2 | Conduct On-Site Factory Audit | Validate production capability and infrastructure | Schedule unannounced or third-party audit. Verify machinery (blown film extruders, bag-making machines), workforce, and workflow. |
| 3 | Request Production Data & MOQ Flexibility | Assess scalability and customization capacity | Ask for machine count, output per shift, material sourcing (e.g., LDPE, PA/PE), and sample lead times. Factories offer lower MOQs than traders with direct control. |
| 4 | Evaluate In-House Quality Control Processes | Ensure compliance with international standards | Review QC documentation (AQL levels, SGS/BV reports), lab testing equipment (tensile strength, seal integrity), and ISO 9001 certification. |
| 5 | Review Export History & Client References | Confirm international experience and reliability | Request 3–5 export references (with contactable buyers). Verify shipment records via customs data tools (e.g., ImportGenius, Panjiva). |
| 6 | Test Sample Quality & Documentation | Validate product conformity | Order pre-production samples. Test for thickness consistency, seal strength, puncture resistance, and food-grade compliance (FDA, EU 10/2011). |
How to Distinguish Between a Trading Company and a Factory
| Indicator | Factory (Manufacturer) | Trading Company | Verification Method |
|---|---|---|---|
| Facility Ownership | Owns production equipment and厂房 (factory space) | No in-house production; outsources to third parties | On-site audit: observe machinery in operation |
| Pricing Structure | Lower base cost; transparent material + processing breakdown | Higher unit cost; may lack granular cost detail | Request itemized quote (raw material, labor, overhead) |
| Lead Times | Shorter lead times due to direct control | Longer lead times (dependent on factory scheduling) | Compare quoted production cycles |
| Customization Capability | Can modify bag size, thickness, printing, material blend | Limited to what partner factories offer | Request custom sample with specific specs |
| Staff Expertise | Engineers, production managers on-site | Sales-focused team; limited technical knowledge | Interview technical personnel during audit |
| Certifications | Holds ISO, SGS, FDA, or BRC certifications under company name | May share factory certificates without ownership proof | Cross-check certificate registration number on issuing body website |
✅ Pro Tip: A hybrid model exists (trading company with affiliated factory). If so, demand proof of equity ownership or long-term exclusive partnership.
Red Flags to Avoid When Sourcing in China
| Red Flag | Risk | Recommended Action |
|---|---|---|
| Unwillingness to conduct video call or factory tour | High likelihood of being a trading company or fraudulent entity | Insist on live video walkthrough of production lines |
| No business license or refusal to provide copy | Illegal operation or shell company | Disqualify immediately; verify via China’s official enterprise registry |
| Prices significantly below market average | Inferior materials (e.g., recycled content), short-term fraud | Benchmark against 5+ verified suppliers; request material source proof |
| Generic product photos or stock images | No real production capability | Require time-stamped photos with your logo/samples |
| Pressure to pay 100% upfront | High risk of non-delivery | Use secure payment terms: 30% deposit, 70% against BL copy |
| Poor English communication or lack of technical detail | Potential middleman or inexperienced operator | Engage a sourcing agent or bilingual auditor for due diligence |
| No third-party inspection acceptance | Hides quality issues | Require pre-shipment inspection (PSI) via SGS, Intertek, or QIMA |
Best Practices for Sustainable Supplier Relationships
- Start with a trial order (20–30% of target volume) to validate performance.
- Sign a Supplier Quality Agreement (SQA) outlining material specs, AQL standards, and IP protection.
- Implement periodic audits (annual or bi-annual) to ensure consistency.
- Diversify across 2–3 qualified suppliers to mitigate supply chain risk.
- Use Escrow or Letter of Credit (LC) for initial large orders until trust is established.
Conclusion
Identifying a genuine manufacturer for small vacuum sealer bags in China requires diligence, technical verification, and structured due diligence. By following the steps above, procurement managers can reduce risk, ensure product quality, and build resilient supply chains. Partnering with experienced sourcing consultants like SourcifyChina enhances verification accuracy and accelerates supplier onboarding.
Prepared by:
Senior Sourcing Consultant
SourcifyChina – Strategic Sourcing Partner for Global Procurement Teams
www.sourcifychina.com | [email protected]
Get the Verified Supplier List
SourcifyChina Verified Pro List: Strategic Sourcing Report 2026
Target Sector: Small Vacuum Sealer Bags (China Manufacturing Base)
Prepared For: Global Procurement & Supply Chain Leadership
Executive Summary: Mitigating Sourcing Risk in Specialty Packaging
Global demand for small vacuum sealer bags (≤5L capacity) surged 22% YoY in 2025, driven by e-commerce meal kits, pharmaceutical preservation, and premium food exports. Concurrently, 68% of procurement teams reported significant delays due to unverified supplier claims (2025 Global Packaging Sourcing Survey). Traditional sourcing methods for this niche segment incur hidden costs in vetting, quality failures, and production halts. SourcifyChina’s Verified Pro List eliminates these inefficiencies through rigorously audited supplier data.
Time-to-Procurement Analysis: Traditional vs. SourcifyChina Verified Pro List
Based on 2025 client data (n=47 procurement cycles for vacuum sealer bags)
| Sourcing Activity | Avg. Time (Traditional) | Avg. Time (w/ Verified Pro List) | Time Saved | Risk Reduction |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Initial Supplier Identification | 32 hours | 2 hours | 30h | 92% ↓ (Invalid leads) |
| Factory Capability Verification | 48 hours | 6 hours | 42h | 85% ↓ (Overstated capacity) |
| Quality Compliance Screening | 28 hours | 4 hours | 24h | 78% ↓ (Non-compliant materials) |
| MOQ/Negotiation Cycle | 22 hours | 9 hours | 13h | 63% ↓ (Scope creep) |
| TOTAL PER PROCUREMENT CYCLE | 130 hours | 21 hours | 109h (84%) | 79% avg. risk mitigation |
💡 Key Insight: 109 hours saved per sourcing cycle = 2.7 weeks of procurement bandwidth redirected to strategic initiatives (e.g., sustainability compliance, cost engineering). Verified suppliers on our Pro List maintain a 96.4% on-time delivery rate (vs. industry avg. of 78.1% for unvetted Chinese suppliers).
Why the Verified Pro List Delivers Unmatched Efficiency for Vacuum Sealer Bags
- Precision Filtering
Isolate only factories with: - FDA/CE/ISO 22000 certifications for food-grade films
- Proven capacity for ≤5L bag production (min. 500k units/month)
-
Track record exporting to EU/US (avoiding customs bottlenecks)
-
Pre-Validated Operational Metrics
Every supplier includes: - Real-time production capacity data (audited quarterly)
- Material traceability reports (LDPE/PA/AL film composition)
-
Minimum defect rates (<0.8% per 10k units)
-
Zero-Vetting Onboarding
Skip 3rd-party inspections: All factories undergo SourcifyChina’s 112-point audit (including mold maintenance logs & dye migration testing).
Call to Action: Secure Your Competitive Edge in 2026
The cost of delayed sourcing isn’t just time—it’s lost market share. With 2026 EU plastic regulations tightening (SUP Directive Annex II), securing certified vacuum sealer bag partners now prevents supply chain fractures during peak demand cycles.
✅ Your Next Step:
Request your custom Verified Pro List for “China Small Vacuum Sealer Bags” within 24 business hours.
Our sourcing engineers will pre-qualify 3 factories matching your:
– Volume requirements (MOQ ≤50k units)
– Material specifications (e.g., matte/transparent, 80-100µm thickness)
– Target FOB pricing band
Act Now to Lock In Q1 2026 Capacity:
📧 Email: [email protected]
(Subject line: “2026 Vacuum Sealer Bags Pro List Request – [Your Company]”)
📱 WhatsApp Priority Channel: +86 159 5127 6160
(Mention “B2B2026” for expedited factory mapping)
Deadline: First-come access to 2026 pre-audited suppliers closes February 28, 2026.
Note: Pro List access includes 1 complimentary SourcifyChina sourcing engineer consultation.
SourcifyChina | ISO 9001:2015 Certified Sourcing Partner | 12,000+ Verified Chinese Factories | Since 2010
Data Source: SourcifyChina 2025 Supplier Performance Dashboard (Verified Pro List Clients Only)
🧮 Landed Cost Calculator
Estimate your total import cost from China.
