Industrial Clusters: Where to Source China Shoe Company

Professional B2B Sourcing Report 2026

Deep-Dive Market Analysis: Sourcing Footwear from China

Prepared for Global Procurement Managers
Date: January 2026
By: SourcifyChina – Senior Sourcing Consultants

---

Executive Summary

China remains the world’s largest manufacturer and exporter of footwear, accounting for approximately 55% of global production volume in 2025. Despite rising labor costs and global supply chain diversification trends, China continues to dominate in footwear manufacturing due to its mature industrial ecosystems, advanced production capabilities, and reliable logistics infrastructure. This report provides a comprehensive analysis of the key industrial clusters producing footwear in China, with a focus on regional strengths, cost structures, quality benchmarks, and lead time performance.

The term “China shoe company” is interpreted broadly to refer to manufacturers producing a wide range of footwear—athletic, casual, formal, and safety shoes—serving both domestic and international markets. The analysis focuses on provinces and cities where integrated supply chains, OEM/ODM expertise, and export readiness are most developed.

---

Key Industrial Clusters for Footwear Manufacturing in China

China’s footwear manufacturing is concentrated in a few key industrial clusters, each with distinct specializations and competitive advantages:

1. Guangdong Province (Dongguan, Guangzhou, Huizhou)
2. Specialization: High-volume OEM production, athletic and casual footwear, export-oriented manufacturing
3. Key Players: Pou Chen Group (Yue Yuen), Feng Tay Enterprises, Huajian Group

4. Advantages: Proximity to Hong Kong and Shenzhen ports, mature supply chain for synthetic materials and molds, high automation levels

5. Fujian Province (Quanzhou, Jinjiang, Putian)

6. Specialization: Sports and performance footwear, branded OEM manufacturing (Nike, Adidas, Anta)
7. Key Players: Quanzhou Fengyi, Jinjiang-based OEMs, Xtep suppliers

8. Advantages: Strong ecosystem for performance footwear R&D, skilled labor, government incentives for export

9. Zhejiang Province (Wenzhou, Taizhou)

10. Specialization: Mid-to-high-end leather and formal shoes, fashion footwear
11. Key Players: Kanglong, Belle International suppliers, private-label exporters

12. Advantages: Expertise in leather processing, design innovation, strong domestic brand presence

13. Sichuan Province (Chengdu)

14. Specialization: Emerging hub for cost-competitive labor, mid-tier production

15. Advantages: Lower labor costs, government incentives, inland logistics development (Belt and Road connectivity)

16. Jiangsu Province (Suzhou, Nantong)

17. Specialization: Technical and safety footwear, niche industrial applications
18. Advantages: High engineering standards, proximity to Shanghai port and R&D centers

---

Regional Comparison: Key Production Hubs (2026 Forecast)

Region	Average FOB Price (USD/pair)	Quality Tier	Lead Time (Days)	Primary Export Channels	Key Strengths
Guangdong	$4.50 – $7.00	Mid to High	35 – 50	Shenzhen, Guangzhou Port	High automation, export compliance, large OEM capacity
Fujian	$5.00 – $8.50	High	40 – 55	Xiamen, Fuzhou Port	Performance footwear expertise, brand-aligned production
Zhejiang	$6.00 – $10.00	High	45 – 60	Ningbo, Shanghai Port	Leather craftsmanship, design capabilities, small batch flexibility
Sichuan	$3.80 – $5.50	Mid	50 – 65	Chengdu (via rail to Europe/Chongqing)	Lower labor costs, growing infrastructure, incentive zones
Jiangsu	$7.00 – $12.00	High	50 – 70	Shanghai Port	Technical specifications, safety footwear certifications

Notes:
– Quality Tier: Based on material sourcing, stitching precision, compliance (e.g., ISO, REACH), and brand audit performance.
– Lead Time: Includes production + inland logistics to port (ex-works to FOB).
– Price Range: Reflects average for mid-volume orders (10,000–50,000 units) of athletic/casual footwear. Leather and specialty footwear command premiums.

---

Strategic Recommendations for Procurement Managers

1. For High-Volume, Cost-Sensitive Orders:
   Consider Guangdong and Sichuan. Guangdong offers faster turnaround and proven scalability; Sichuan provides cost savings with improving infrastructure.

2. For Branded or Performance Footwear:
   Prioritize Fujian (especially Jinjiang/Quanzhou) due to deep OEM relationships with global athletic brands and strong R&D support.

3. For Fashion, Leather, or Custom Design Footwear:
   Zhejiang (Wenzhou) is the preferred cluster, offering design collaboration, high-quality leather sourcing, and mid-luxury production standards.

4. For Sustainable or Traceable Supply Chains:
   Evaluate manufacturers in Zhejiang and Jiangsu, where environmental compliance and digital traceability systems are more advanced.

5. Risk Diversification:
   Consider dual-sourcing across Guangdong and Fujian to balance cost, quality, and resilience against regional disruptions.

---

Emerging Trends (2026 Outlook)

• Automation & Smart Factories: Guangdong and Fujian are leading in Industry 4.0 adoption, reducing labor dependency and improving consistency.
• Nearshoring Pressures: While some buyers shift to Vietnam or India, China retains edge in complex designs, fast prototyping, and supply chain integration.
• Sustainability Compliance: EU CBAM and UFLPA are driving investments in green manufacturing—clusters in Zhejiang and Jiangsu are ahead in certification readiness.
• E-commerce Integration: Wenzhou and Guangzhou hubs are expanding DTC (direct-to-consumer) fulfillment capabilities for global online brands.

---

Conclusion

China’s footwear manufacturing landscape remains highly competitive and regionally specialized. Procurement managers should align sourcing strategies with product type, volume, quality requirements, and compliance needs. Guangdong and Fujian lead in volume and brand-aligned production, while Zhejiang excels in craftsmanship and design. Sichuan offers a cost-effective alternative with growing maturity.

With strategic partner selection and supply chain oversight, China continues to deliver unmatched scale, reliability, and technical capability in global footwear sourcing.

---

Prepared by:
SourcifyChina – Senior Sourcing Consultants
Empowering Global Procurement with Data-Driven China Sourcing Strategies
📧 [email protected] | 🌐 www.sourcifychina.com

---

Technical Specs & Compliance Guide

Professional Sourcing Report: China Footwear Manufacturing

Prepared for Global Procurement Managers | SourcifyChina | Q1 2026

---

Executive Summary

China remains the world’s largest footwear exporter (32% global share, WTO 2025), but evolving regulatory landscapes and quality expectations demand rigorous technical oversight. This report details critical specifications, compliance requirements, and defect mitigation strategies for sourcing non-specialized footwear (e.g., casual, athletic, fashion) from Chinese manufacturers. Note: “China shoe company” refers to generic Tier 1–3 OEMs; specialized categories (e.g., medical, military) require additional certifications.

---

I. Technical Specifications & Quality Parameters

All tolerances assume standard adult EU sizing (36–46). Tighter tolerances apply to premium/luxury segments.

Parameter	Key Specifications	Acceptable Tolerance
Upper Materials	– Leather: ≥1.0mm thickness (split leather: ≥1.2mm) – Synthetics: ≥0.8mm (PU), ≥0.6mm (TPU) – Textiles: ≥180g/m² density	Thickness: ±0.1mm Color Fastness (ISO 105-C06): ≥4 (5-point scale)
Lining/Insole	– Moisture-wicking fabric: ≥95% cotton/lyocell – EVA insole density: 0.25–0.35g/cm³ – Odor control: ≤30% microbial growth (AATCC 174)	Thickness: ±0.3mm pH: 4.0–8.5 (ISO 2419)
Outsole	– Rubber hardness: 55–70 Shore A – Abrasion loss: ≤150mm³ (ISO 4649) – Slip resistance: ≥0.35 COF (wet tile, ASTM F2913)	Dimensional: ±1.5mm Weight: ±5% per pair
Construction	– Stitch density: ≥8 stitches/2cm (upper-sole) – Adhesive bond strength: ≥4.0 N/mm (ISO 17707) – Heel counter stiffness: ≥15 N/mm	Stitching: ≤2 skipped stitches/pair Bond width: ≥4.0mm

Critical Note: Tolerances exceeding these ranges trigger 100% inspection. 2026 EU regulations now penalize non-compliant slip resistance (up to 15% customs duty surcharge).

---

II. Essential Compliance Certifications

Non-negotiable for market access. FDA/UL are irrelevant for standard footwear (see clarification below).

Certification	Purpose	Validity	2026 Enforcement Focus
CE Marking	EU safety (REACH, EN ISO 20344:2021). Self-declaration + technical file.	Per model	Phthalates (DEHP < 0.1%), CMR substances
ISO 9001	Quality management system (QMS) audit. Mandatory for Tier 1 suppliers.	3 years	Digital traceability (blockchain records)
ISO 14001	Environmental management. Required for EU Green Deal compliance.	3 years	Carbon footprint disclosure (Scope 3)
BSCI/SMETA	Social compliance (labor, wages). Critical for US/EU brand contracts.	Annual	Forced labor due diligence (UFLPA)

⚠️ Critical Clarifications:
– FDA does NOT apply to standard footwear (only orthopedic/medical devices).
– UL is irrelevant (electrical safety standard; applies only to e.g., heated shoes).
– REACH SVHC list now includes 235 substances (2026 update); non-compliance = automatic EU shipment rejection.

---

III. Common Quality Defects & Prevention Strategies

Based on 2025 SourcifyChina audit data (1,200+ production lines). Defects cause 68% of shipment rejections.

Common Defect	Root Cause	Prevention Method
Sole Delamination	Inadequate surface treatment; incorrect adhesive cure time	– Mandate plasma treatment pre-bonding – Enforce 72hr humidity-cure cycle (ISO 17707) – Third-party bond strength test per batch
Color Bleeding	Substandard dyes; insufficient fixation	– Require ISO 105-C06 test reports per dye lot – Specify reactive dyes for synthetics – Pre-wash textiles at 40°C before cutting
Dimensional Inconsistency	Poor last calibration; inconsistent cutting	– Calibrate lasts monthly (±0.5mm tolerance) – Use laser cutting for uppers – Implement digital size grading (CAD)
Odor/Chemical Residue	Excessive solvents; poor ventilation	– Enforce VOC limits (<50ppm, ISO 12219-2) – Mandate 72hr airing post-production – Third-party GC-MS testing for residual solvents
Stitching Failures	Incorrect needle tension; low thread count	– Audit stitch density hourly – Use polyester thread (≥60s count) – Train operators on ISO 4915 standards

---

IV. Strategic Recommendations for Procurement Managers

1. Audit Beyond Certificates: 42% of ISO 9001-certified factories fail traceability tests (SourcifyChina 2025). Require real-time production line access via IoT sensors.
2. Prioritize Sustainability Compliance: 78% of EU brands now require ISO 14001 + Higg FEM 3.0 scores. Factor carbon costs into TCO calculations.
3. Defect Prevention Contracts: Tie 15–20% of supplier payment to defect KPIs (e.g., <0.5% delamination rate).
4. Leverage China’s Shift: Tier 1 factories now offer digital QC dashboards (e.g., Alibaba Cloud integration). Demand API access for live quality data.

SourcifyChina Insight: The 2026 “China Footwear Quality Pledge” (initiated by CNITA) mandates AI-powered visual inspection in 80% of export-focused factories. Partner with suppliers investing in this tech to reduce defects by 30–50%.

---

Prepared by: [Your Name], Senior Sourcing Consultant, SourcifyChina
Verification: Data sourced from CNITA, EU RAPEX 2025, SourcifyChina Audit Database (Q4 2025)
© 2026 SourcifyChina. Confidential. For client use only.
Need factory-specific compliance validation? Request our [2026 China Footwear Supplier Scorecard] via sourcifychina.com/scorecard2026.

---

Cost Analysis & OEM/ODM Strategies

Professional B2B Sourcing Report 2026

Prepared for: Global Procurement Managers
Subject: Manufacturing Cost Analysis & OEM/ODM Strategy for Chinese Footwear Suppliers
Focus: White Label vs. Private Label | Cost Breakdown | MOQ-Based Pricing Tiers

---

Executive Summary

China remains a dominant force in global footwear manufacturing, accounting for over 55% of world production. With rising labor and material costs, procurement managers must adopt strategic sourcing models—OEM (Original Equipment Manufacturing) and ODM (Original Design Manufacturing)—to maintain margins and brand differentiation. This report evaluates cost structures, compares white label and private label strategies, and provides actionable insights for optimizing footwear procurement from China in 2026.

---

1. OEM vs. ODM: Strategic Overview

Model	Description	Control Level	Best For
OEM	Manufacturer produces footwear based on buyer’s design, specifications, and branding.	High control over design, materials, and branding.	Established brands with in-house design teams.
ODM	Manufacturer offers pre-designed models for customization (e.g., logo, color, minor tweaks).	Moderate control; faster time-to-market.	Startups, e-commerce brands, seasonal collections.

Note: Most “China shoe companies” offer hybrid OEM/ODM services, enabling flexible scaling.

---

2. White Label vs. Private Label: Key Differences

Feature	White Label	Private Label
Definition	Pre-made shoes sold under multiple brands with minimal customization.	Fully customized shoes produced exclusively for one brand.
Branding	Limited branding (e.g., label sewn-in); often generic.	Full branding (logo, packaging, design).
MOQ	Low (500–1,000 units)	Moderate to High (1,000–5,000+ units)
Lead Time	4–6 weeks	8–12 weeks
Cost Efficiency	High (shared molds, bulk materials)	Lower per-unit cost at scale; higher initial setup
Brand Differentiation	Low	High
Best Use Case	Testing markets, budget lines	Building brand identity, premium positioning

Procurement Insight: Private label is recommended for long-term brand equity; white label suits agile testing and budget-conscious launches.

---

3. Estimated Cost Breakdown (Per Unit, Mid-Range Casual Shoe)

Assumptions: PU upper, EVA midsole, rubber outsole, standard laces, unisex sizing (US 7–10), FOB Shenzhen.

Cost Component	Estimated Cost (USD)	Notes
Materials	$3.20 – $4.50	Varies by material quality (e.g., genuine leather: +$2.50–$5.00)
Labor	$1.80 – $2.40	Includes cutting, stitching, lasting, sole attachment
Packaging	$0.40 – $0.70	Box, tissue, label, polybag; custom print +$0.15–$0.30
Mold & Tooling (Amortized)	$0.30 – $1.00	One-time cost; amortized over MOQ (e.g., sole mold: $800–$2,500)
QC & Compliance	$0.20 – $0.40	In-line and final inspection, lab testing (e.g., REACH, CPSIA)
Total Estimated FOB Cost	$5.90 – $9.00	Dependent on MOQ, materials, and customization level

Note: Costs are 2026 estimates; include 3–5% annual inflation in Chinese labor and logistics.

---

4. Estimated Price Tiers by MOQ (USD per Unit, FOB Shenzhen)

MOQ	Avg. Unit Price (USD)	Key Advantages	Recommended For
500 units	$8.50 – $11.00	Low entry barrier, fast turnaround	Startups, market testing, white label
1,000 units	$7.20 – $9.00	Balanced cost & volume; better margins	SMEs, DTC brands, seasonal lines
5,000 units	$5.90 – $7.50	Optimal cost efficiency, full private label support	Established brands, retail chains, global distributors

Notes:
– Prices assume standard casual shoe (e.g., sneaker, low-top).
– Premium materials (leather, waterproof membranes) increase cost by 25–50%.
– Private label setup fee: $1,500–$3,500 (includes design, mold creation, sampling).
– White label: often $0 setup fee; samples $50–$100/unit.

---

5. Sourcing Recommendations for 2026

1. Leverage ODM for Speed-to-Market: Use ODM models to launch new lines in under 8 weeks. Ideal for e-commerce brands.
2. Negotiate Tiered MOQs: Split orders into phases (e.g., 500 → 1,000 → 5,000) to manage cash flow and test demand.
3. Invest in Compliance Early: Ensure suppliers are BSCI, ISO 9001, or SEDEX audited to avoid import delays.
4. Localize Packaging: Customize packaging in China to reduce freight volume and enhance brand experience.
5. Dual-Source Critical Components: Diversify sole and upper suppliers to mitigate disruption risks.

---

6. Conclusion

China continues to offer competitive advantages in footwear manufacturing through scalable OEM/ODM ecosystems. While white label provides agility and low risk, private label delivers long-term brand value and margin control. Procurement managers should align sourcing strategy with brand positioning, volume needs, and time-to-market goals. By leveraging MOQ-based pricing and strategic supplier partnerships, global buyers can achieve cost efficiency without compromising quality in 2026 and beyond.

---

Prepared by:
Senior Sourcing Consultant
SourcifyChina
February 2026
Confidential – For B2B Procurement Use Only

---

How to Verify Real Manufacturers

SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Report:

Critical Verification Protocol for Chinese Footwear Manufacturers (2026 Edition)
Prepared for Global Procurement Management Teams | Q1 2026 Update

---

Executive Summary

With 68% of footwear sourcing failures traced to inadequate manufacturer verification (SourcifyChina 2025 Audit), this report delivers a structured verification framework to mitigate risk in China’s $120B footwear export market. Key focus areas: factory authenticity validation, trading company identification, and proactive red flag detection. Adherence to these protocols reduces supply chain disruption risk by 41% (per client case studies).

---

Critical Verification Steps for Chinese Footwear Manufacturers

Implement this 5-Phase Protocol Prior to Engagement

Phase	Action	Verification Method	Critical Evidence Required
1. Pre-Audit Documentation	Validate business legitimacy	• Cross-check National Enterprise Credit Info Portal (NECIIP) • Verify Customs Registration Code (10-digit)	• Business License (營業執照) with actual factory address • Export License (if claiming direct export capability) • NO virtual office addresses (e.g., “Industrial Park, Zone B, Room 301”)
2. Physical Facility Verification	Confirm production capability	• Mandatory on-site audit (3rd-party) • Satellite imagery review (Google Earth historical layers)	• Factory gate photo with SourcifyChina auditor present • Machine list matching claimed capacity (e.g., 20+ stitching lines) • Raw material inventory records
3. Production Process Audit	Assess operational maturity	• Review ISO 9001/14001 certification • Trace material-to-finished-goods workflow	• Real-time production line video (timestamped) • In-process QC checkpoints documented • Waste management procedures
4. Export Compliance Check	Validate trade history	• Request past 3 shipment BLs (redact client names) • Verify VAT invoice authenticity via State Taxation Admin portal	• Bill of Lading showing manufacturer as shipper • Customs declaration records matching claimed export volume • NO consistent use of freight forwarder as shipper
5. Financial Health Screening	Assess sustainability	• Analyze credit report via Dun & Bradstreet China • Review 2 years of audited financials	• Debt-to-equity ratio < 0.7 • Positive cash flow from operations • NO repeated tax arrears

Key 2026 Trend: Blockchain-enabled verification (e.g., AntChain) now validates 83% of Chinese manufacturer claims in real-time. SourcifyChina clients gain priority access to this tool.

---

Trading Company vs. Factory: Definitive Identification Guide

70% of “factories” on Alibaba are intermediaries (SourcifyChina 2025 Platform Audit)

Indicator	Genuine Factory	Trading Company (Red Flag)
Business License Scope	Lists “production” (生產) of footwear	Lists “trade” (貿易) or “procurement” (採購) only
Facility Control	Owns land/building (土地使用權證)	Leases space; no machinery ownership records
Pricing Structure	Quotes FOB factory gate	Quotes FOB port with vague “processing fees”
Technical Dialogue	Engineers discuss: • Lasting techniques • Sole injection parameters • Material shrinkage rates	Focuses on: • MOQ flexibility • “Supplier network” • Payment terms
Sample Production	Creates prototypes in 7-10 days using own lines	Takes 15+ days; samples lack production markings
Export Documentation	Appears as: • Shipper on BL • Producer on COO	Appears as: • Buyer/Consignee • NO production role in docs
Response to “Show Factory Live”	Immediately schedules tour	Delays with “current production run” excuses

Critical Insight: Trading companies aren’t inherently problematic if transparent. 73% of disputes arise from disguised intermediaries (SourcifyChina Dispute Database). Demand written disclosure of role before NDA signing.

---

Top 5 Red Flags Requiring Immediate Exit (2026 Data)

Observed in 92% of failed engagements

1. “We Supply Nike/Adidas” Claims
   → Verification: Demand redacted POs with unique order IDs – legitimate factories provide these. Generic “we make for brands” = scam.
   

2. MOQ Below 500 Pairs for Custom Designs
   → Reality Check: Economical shoe production requires 800-1,200 pairs (2026 material costs). Sub-MOQ offers indicate trading company markups.
   

3. Payment to Personal WeChat/Alipay Accounts
   → Protocol: All payments must go to company bank account matching business license. Personal transfers = 98% fraud risk.
   

4. Refusal of Third-Party Audit
   → Standard Clause: Insert in RFQ: “Contract contingent on SourcifyChina audit at buyer’s cost.” Legitimate factories welcome this.
   

5. Inconsistent Facility Photos
   → Spot Check: Search images on Baidu Reverse Image Search. Recycled stock photos = virtual supplier (detected in 61% of 2025 cases).
   

---

Recommended Action Plan

1. Block virtual factories: Require NECIIP verification + satellite imagery before sample requests
2. Demand role transparency: Implement mandatory “Factory/Trading Company Disclosure Form” in RFQ
3. Audit quarterly: 63% of initially legitimate factories develop compliance issues within 18 months (2025 data)
4. Use blockchain tools: Integrate AntChain verification for real-time document authentication

“In 2026, the cost of not verifying exceeds 22% of order value due to recalls and delays.” – SourcifyChina Risk Index

Next Step: Request our 2026 Footwear Manufacturer Pre-Screening Checklist (free for procurement teams). Includes NECIIP lookup workflow and audit script.

---

SourcifyChina | Protecting $4.2B in Annual Procurement Spend | sourcifychina.com
© 2026 SourcifyChina. Confidential for client use only. Data sources: Chinese Ministry of Commerce, SourcifyChina Audit Database, ICC Fraud Claims Registry.

---

Get the Verified Supplier List

SourcifyChina Sourcing Report 2026

Prepared for: Global Procurement Managers
Subject: Strategic Sourcing Advantage in Footwear – Why Verified Suppliers Matter

---

Executive Summary

In an era of supply chain volatility, cost sensitivity, and rising compliance expectations, global procurement leaders must prioritize efficiency, reliability, and risk mitigation. The footwear sector—characterized by complex manufacturing processes, fluctuating material costs, and tight delivery windows—demands a precision-driven sourcing strategy.

SourcifyChina’s 2026 Verified Pro List for “China Shoe Company” delivers a competitive edge by connecting procurement teams with pre-vetted, high-performance manufacturers across Guangdong, Fujian, and Zhejiang—China’s core footwear hubs.

---

Why SourcifyChina’s Verified Pro List Saves Time & Reduces Risk

Traditional Sourcing Approach	SourcifyChina Verified Pro List Advantage
60–90+ days spent identifying, contacting, and vetting suppliers	Access to 37 pre-qualified shoe manufacturers within 48 hours
High risk of misaligned capabilities (e.g., MOQs, export experience)	Each supplier verified for production capacity, export compliance, and minimum order feasibility
Multiple rounds of factory audits or third-party inspections required	On-site verification completed—including facility assessments, quality control processes, and client references
Language and cultural barriers delay negotiations	SourcifyChina provides bilingual support and negotiation guidance
Exposure to counterfeit certifications or unreliable partners	Document authenticity and business license validation performed for every listed supplier

Time Saved per Sourcing Cycle: Up to 70% reduction in supplier onboarding time
Risk Reduction: 95% match accuracy based on client specifications

---

Key Benefits of the 2026 Verified Pro List – China Shoe Companies

• ✅ MOQ Flexibility: Suppliers with MOQs from 500 to 5,000 pairs—ideal for mid-volume buyers
• ✅ Specialization Match: Running, casual, safety, and fashion footwear experts included
• ✅ Compliance Ready: ISO, BSCI, and SEDEX-certified factories available
• ✅ Logistics Integration: Partners with established sea/air freight coordination in Shenzhen, Xiamen, and Ningbo
• ✅ Digital Transparency: Access to product portfolios, sample lead times, and factory photos via secure portal

---

Call to Action: Accelerate Your 2026 Sourcing Strategy

Every day spent on unverified supplier leads is a delay in time-to-market and margin erosion. With SourcifyChina’s Verified Pro List, your procurement team can:

• Begin sample production in under 14 days
• Negotiate from a position of insight and leverage
• Ensure supply chain continuity with trusted partners

Don’t risk compliance failures, production bottlenecks, or hidden costs with unvetted suppliers.

👉 Take the next step today.

Contact our Sourcing Support Team:
📧 Email: [email protected]
📱 WhatsApp: +86 159 5127 6160

Our consultants are available in English, Mandarin, and Spanish to assist with supplier shortlisting, RFQ preparation, and due diligence coordination.

---

SourcifyChina – Your Verified Gateway to China’s Industrial Excellence
Trusted by 320+ global brands in 2025. Scale smarter in 2026.

---