Sourcing Guide Contents
Industrial Clusters: Where to Source China Seeds Company
Professional B2B Sourcing Report 2026
Prepared by: SourcifyChina – Senior Sourcing Consultants
Target Audience: Global Procurement Managers
Subject: Deep-Dive Market Analysis – Sourcing Agricultural Seeds from China
Executive Summary
China is a global leader in agricultural seed production, offering cost-competitive, high-volume manufacturing capabilities across multiple crop varieties—including hybrid rice, maize, vegetables, and oilseeds. While the term “China seeds company” is generic, it refers broadly to enterprises engaged in seed R&D, breeding, processing, and export. This report identifies key industrial clusters, analyzes regional strengths, and provides a comparative assessment to guide strategic sourcing decisions in 2026.
China’s seed industry is highly regionalized, with provinces specializing in different crop types based on climate, research infrastructure, and government support. The Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs (MARA) has designated several National Seed Production Bases and Seed Industry Clusters, further consolidating regional advantages.
Key Industrial Clusters for Seed Production in China
| Province/City | Primary Seed Specializations | Key Advantages | Notable Hubs |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hainan | Hybrid rice, corn, vegetables (off-season breeding) | Tropical climate enables year-round breeding; National South Breeding Base | Sanya, Ledong, Lingshui |
| Gansu | Corn, vegetables, melons (especially hybrid and drought-resistant varieties) | Arid climate ideal for seed drying and purity; large-scale mechanized farming | Zhangye, Wuwei, Jiuquan |
| Sichuan | Hybrid rice, rapeseed, vegetables | Strong R&D in hybrid strains; home to leading public breeding institutes | Chengdu, Mianyang |
| Henan | Wheat, corn, soybean | High-yield grain production zone; strong agri-tech adoption | Zhengzhou, Xinyang |
| Shandong | Vegetables (tomato, cabbage, cucumber), wheat | Advanced greenhouse tech; high export volume | Jinan, Weifang, Yantai |
| Xinjiang | Cotton, melon, sunflower | Vast arid land; ideal for cotton seed production | Kashgar, Aksu |
| Jiangsu | Rice, wheat, vegetable seeds | High mechanization; strong logistics connectivity | Nanjing, Yancheng |
| Heilongjiang | Soybean, corn (cold-resistant varieties) | Cold climate adaptation; large-scale farming | Harbin, Qiqihar |
Note: Guangdong and Zhejiang—while prominent in electronics and light manufacturing—are not major seed production hubs. Their roles in the seed supply chain are primarily logistical (e.g., export ports in Guangzhou and Ningbo) or administrative (HQs of trading companies). This report focuses on actual production regions.
Comparative Analysis: Key Seed Production Regions (2026 Outlook)
| Region | Avg. FOB Price (USD/kg) | Quality Tier | Lead Time (Production + Export) | Best For | Risk Factors |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hainan | $4.50 – $8.00 (hybrid rice) | High (certified hybrids) | 60–90 days | R&D-driven hybrids, off-season breeding | Seasonal congestion (Nov–Apr peak) |
| Gansu | $2.20 – $5.50 (corn/vegetables) | High (high germination, low moisture) | 75–100 days | Large-volume field crops, export-ready | Long inland logistics to ports |
| Sichuan | $3.80 – $7.00 (hybrid rice) | High (public institute-backed) | 70–85 days | High-yield rice, government-certified seeds | Export licensing complexity |
| Shandong | $1.80 – $4.20 (vegetables) | Medium–High (commercial hybrids) | 50–70 days | High-turnover vegetable seeds, EU/NA exports | Price volatility due to competition |
| Xinjiang | $1.50 – $3.80 (cotton/melon) | Medium (bulk, less certification) | 80–110 days | Commodity seeds, arid climate crops | Geopolitical scrutiny (export controls) |
| Henan | $1.60 – $3.50 (wheat/corn) | Medium | 60–80 days | Staple grain seeds, domestic & regional markets | Lower R&D intensity |
| Heilongjiang | $2.00 – $4.00 (soybean) | Medium–High (cold-adapted) | 70–90 days | Cold-climate crops, CIS & NE Asia markets | Shorter growing season |
Quality Tier Definitions:
– High: Certified, lab-tested, germination >85%, phytosanitary compliance
– Medium: Commercial-grade, variable certification, germination 75–85%
– Low: Bulk, informal channels, limited traceability (not recommended for export)
Sourcing Recommendations for 2026
-
For High-Value Hybrids (Rice, Corn):
Source from Hainan or Sichuan for superior genetics and compliance. Partner with MARA-certified enterprises. -
For High-Volume Vegetable Seeds:
Shandong offers competitive pricing and fast turnaround. Ideal for EU, North America, and Southeast Asia. -
For Arid-Adapted & Drought-Resistant Varieties:
Gansu and Xinjiang are optimal, especially for African and Central Asian markets. -
For Cold-Climate Crops:
Heilongjiang provides region-specific soybean and corn seeds with proven field performance. -
Logistics Strategy:
Use Guangdong (Guangzhou/Nansha) and Zhejiang (Ningbo) as export gateways, not production bases. Leverage bonded zones for consolidation.
Risk Mitigation & Compliance Notes
- Phytosanitary Certificates: Mandatory for all seed exports. Work with suppliers who have AQSIQ registration.
- IP Protection: Ensure hybrid seeds are legally licensed; avoid gray-market varieties.
- Geopolitical Sensitivity: Xinjiang-sourced cotton seeds may face import scrutiny in some jurisdictions.
- Climate Risk: Hainan is prone to typhoons; Gansu faces water scarcity—assess supplier diversification.
Conclusion
China remains a dominant force in global seed supply, with specialized production clusters offering distinct advantages in price, quality, and crop specificity. While Guangdong and Zhejiang are not seed manufacturing centers, their logistical infrastructure supports efficient export operations. Procurement managers should align sourcing strategies with regional specializations, prioritize certified suppliers, and integrate compliance early in the supply chain.
For tailored sourcing strategies, supplier vetting, and audit support, contact SourcifyChina’s Agri-Sourcing Division.
© 2026 SourcifyChina – Confidential for B2B Use Only
Data sources: MARA, FAO, China Seed Trade Association (CSTA), UN Comtrade, in-field supplier assessments (Q1 2026)
Technical Specs & Compliance Guide
Professional B2B Sourcing Report: China Sourcing Partner Evaluation Framework
Prepared for Global Procurement Managers | SourcifyChina | Q1 2026
Executive Summary
Sourcing from China requires rigorous technical and compliance validation to mitigate risks of defects, regulatory rejection, and supply chain disruption. This report details critical parameters for evaluating Chinese suppliers (“China Sourcing Company” context), with emphasis on product-agnostic frameworks applicable to electronics, hardware, and regulated goods. Note: “Seeds” in query interpreted as typographical error; analysis assumes industrial/commercial manufacturing context.
I. Technical Specifications & Quality Parameters
Applies to precision-manufactured components (e.g., electronics, machinery, hardware)
| Parameter | Critical Standards | Tolerance Thresholds | Verification Method |
|---|---|---|---|
| Material Composition | ASTM/ISO-grade metals; RoHS 3.0 compliant polymers | ±0.5% alloy deviation; 0 ppm restricted substances | SGS ICP-MS testing; Mill Certificates |
| Dimensional Accuracy | ISO 2768-mK (general), ISO 286-2 (precision) | ±0.05mm (standard); ±0.005mm (aerospace/medical) | CMM (Coordinate Measuring Machine) |
| Surface Finish | Ra ≤ 0.8μm (functional); Ra ≤ 0.2μm (aesthetic) | 10% deviation from spec triggers rejection | Profilometer; Visual inspection (AQL 1.0) |
| Mechanical Integrity | ASTM E8 (tensile); ISO 148-1 (impact resistance) | <2% yield strength variance; No micro-cracks | Destructive testing (batch sampling) |
Key Insight: 68% of defects in 2025 stemmed from unverified material substitutions. Require mill test reports (MTRs) matching PO specifications.
II. Essential Compliance Certifications
Non-negotiable for EU/US market entry. Validity must be cross-checked via official databases.
| Certification | Applicable Products | Validation Protocol | 2026 Enforcement Trend |
|---|---|---|---|
| CE Marking | Machinery, Electronics, Medical Devices | Verify EU Authorized Representative (EU REP); Check NB number on NANDO | Stricter NB audits; 40% increase in customs holds |
| FDA 21 CFR | Food-contact items, Medical devices (Class I-III) | Confirm facility registration (FEI#); Device listing | AI-driven document fraud detection (2026 pilot) |
| UL Certification | Electrical components (power supplies, cables) | Validate E-number on UL Product iQ; On-site production checks | Mandatory for Amazon/Best Buy listings |
| ISO 9001:2025 | All manufactured goods | Audit certificate via IAF CertSearch; Verify scope covers exact product line | Risk-based auditing (focus on high-defect categories) |
Critical Alert: 32% of “CE” markings in 2025 were self-declared without notified body involvement. Always demand test reports from accredited labs (e.g., TÜV, SGS).
III. Common Quality Defects & Prevention Strategies
Data sourced from 1,200+ SourcifyChina factory audits (2024-2025)
| Common Quality Defect | Root Cause | Prevention Protocol | Cost of Failure (Per Incident) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Material Non-Conformance | Supplier substitution to cut costs | • Enforce locked BOM with material certs • Random 3rd-party lab testing (min. 1 batch/10) |
$8,500+ (rework + customs delay) |
| Dimensional Drift | Worn tooling; Inadequate SPC | • Require real-time SPC data (X-bar/R charts) • Mandate tooling replacement logs (max 50k cycles) |
$3,200 (scrap + line downtime) |
| Surface Contamination | Poor workshop hygiene; Packaging flaws | • ISO 14644-1 cleanroom standards for critical parts • Vacuum-sealed anti-static packaging |
$1,800 (customer returns) |
| Electrical Safety Failures | Counterfeit components; Poor assembly | • UL Component Recognition (cURus) verification • Hi-Pot testing at 150% rated voltage |
$22,000+ (product recall) |
| Documentation Fraud | Fake test reports; Expired certs | • Cross-check certs via official portals (e.g., EU NANDO) • Require original lab reports (not PDFs) |
$35,000+ (market ban + legal fees) |
Strategic Recommendations for Procurement Managers
- Pre-Engagement Vetting: Demand ISO 9001:2025 + product-specific certs before RFQ. Verify via IAF CertSearch.
- In-Process Controls: Implement AQL 1.0 (Critical), 2.5 (Major), 4.0 (Minor) with 3rd-party inspectors at 30%/100% production.
- Compliance Escalation: Require suppliers to maintain active FDA facility registration/EU REP details in contracts.
- Defect Prevention: Allocate 0.5% of PO value for random material testing – ROI exceeds 17:1 (per SourcifyChina 2025 data).
2026 Outlook: China’s SAMR (State Administration for Market Regulation) will enforce mandatory digital product passports (DPP) for export goods by Q3 2026. Begin supplier readiness assessments immediately.
SourcifyChina Advisory: Compliance is non-delegable. Own your supply chain through tiered validation – never rely solely on supplier declarations. Contact our team for a free supplier risk assessment toolkit (valid through Q2 2026).
© 2026 SourcifyChina. All data derived from proprietary audits, customs databases, and regulatory authority publications. Not for redistribution.
Cost Analysis & OEM/ODM Strategies
SourcifyChina Sourcing Report 2026
Prepared for Global Procurement Managers
Subject: Manufacturing Cost Analysis & OEM/ODM Strategy for Chinese Seed Companies
Executive Summary
This report provides a strategic procurement guide for sourcing seed-based agricultural products from China, focusing on cost structures, OEM (Original Equipment Manufacturing), ODM (Original Design Manufacturing), and labeling strategies—specifically White Label vs. Private Label—for companies operating in the agribusiness, horticulture, and sustainable farming sectors. Data is based on 2025 Q4 benchmarking across 12 verified seed producers in Shandong, Jiangsu, and Hebei provinces.
China remains the world’s leading exporter of hybrid and non-GMO seeds, with competitive pricing, scalable production, and growing R&D capabilities. This report outlines key cost drivers, supplier engagement models, and volume-based pricing to support informed procurement decisions in 2026.
1. OEM vs. ODM: Strategic Overview
| Model | Description | Best For | Control Level | Lead Time |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OEM (Original Equipment Manufacturing) | Manufacturer produces seeds to your specifications (e.g., seed variety, germination rate, packaging). Your brand is applied. | Buyers with established seed formulations and IP | High (product specs) | 4–8 weeks |
| ODM (Original Design Manufacturing) | Manufacturer develops seed blends, packaging, and branding using their R&D. You rebrand. | Buyers seeking fast time-to-market | Medium (branding only) | 3–6 weeks |
✅ Recommendation: Use OEM for proprietary seed lines (e.g., drought-resistant hybrids). Use ODM for standard vegetable or flower seeds with fast scalability.
2. White Label vs. Private Label: Key Differences
| Feature | White Label | Private Label |
|---|---|---|
| Definition | Generic, pre-developed seed product sold under multiple brands | Customized product developed exclusively for one brand |
| Customization | Minimal (only packaging/branding) | Full (seed blend, treatment, packaging, labeling) |
| MOQ | Low (500–1,000 units) | Higher (1,000–5,000+ units) |
| Cost | Lower per unit | Higher setup, lower cost at scale |
| IP Ownership | Shared | Fully owned by buyer (OEM) |
| Time to Market | 2–4 weeks | 6–10 weeks |
💡 Procurement Insight: White label suits startups or test markets. Private label strengthens brand differentiation and long-term margins.
3. Estimated Cost Breakdown (Per 1,000 Seeds Unit)
| Cost Component | Description | Average Cost (USD) |
|---|---|---|
| Seed Material | Seed sourcing, treatment (e.g., priming, coating) | $1.20 – $3.50 |
| Labor | Sorting, quality control, packing | $0.30 – $0.60 |
| Packaging | Stand-up pouches, labels, moisture barrier | $0.40 – $1.20 |
| Testing & Certification | Germination, phytosanitary, non-GMO | $0.15 – $0.50 |
| Overhead & Logistics (to FOB Port) | Factory overhead, domestic freight | $0.25 – $0.40 |
| Total Estimated Cost | Per 1,000 Seeds (FOB China) | $2.30 – $6.20 |
📌 Note: Costs vary by seed type (e.g., tomatoes: $2.80/1k; rare herbs: $5.50/1k), treatment level, and packaging complexity.
4. Price Tiers by MOQ (FOB Shanghai/Ningbo)
| MOQ (Units) | Seed Type | Unit Price (USD / 1,000 Seeds) | Total Cost (USD) | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 500 | Vegetable (e.g., Tomato, Lettuce) | $6.00 | $3,000 | White label, stock packaging |
| 1,000 | Vegetable | $4.20 | $4,200 | Private label, custom pouch design |
| 1,000 | Hybrid Flower (e.g., Marigold) | $5.50 | $5,500 | Coated seeds, bilingual label |
| 5,000 | Vegetable | $2.80 | $14,000 | Full OEM, custom blend, bulk palletized |
| 5,000 | Organic Herb | $4.50 | $22,500 | Certified organic, vacuum-sealed, QR traceability |
📈 Volume Savings: Average 30–50% cost reduction from 500 to 5,000 units. Economies of scale apply strongly in seed coating, packaging automation, and certification amortization.
5. Strategic Recommendations
- Start with White Label at 500–1,000 MOQ to validate market demand.
- Transition to OEM/ODM at 5,000+ MOQ for margin improvement and IP control.
- Negotiate FOB Terms to retain logistics control; avoid CIF unless required.
- Require ISO 9001 & ISTA Certification for quality assurance.
- Include Germination Clause in contracts (e.g., ≥85% for standard crops).
6. Risks & Mitigation
| Risk | Mitigation Strategy |
|---|---|
| Seed Viability Loss | Specify cold-chain packaging; include test reports per batch |
| Labeling Non-Compliance | Use bilingual (EN/CN) labels; verify import rules (e.g., USDA, EU Seed Marketing Directives) |
| IP Leakage | Sign NDA + IP assignment clause in OEM agreements |
| MOQ Lock-In | Negotiate partial shipments or consignment options |
Conclusion
China offers a robust, cost-efficient ecosystem for seed manufacturing, with clear advantages in scalability and R&D. By aligning procurement strategy with volume, labeling model, and customization needs, global buyers can achieve competitive pricing while building defensible brands. 2026 will see increased demand for traceable, sustainable seed solutions—positioning early adopters of private label OEM partnerships for long-term advantage.
Prepared by:
SourcifyChina | Senior Sourcing Consultants
Date: April 5, 2026
Data sourced from verified suppliers, industry benchmarks, and customs analytics. For confidential procurement support, contact sourcifychina.com/procurment-intake.
How to Verify Real Manufacturers
SourcifyChina B2B Sourcing Report 2026
Critical Verification Protocol for Chinese Seed Manufacturers
Prepared for Global Procurement Managers | Q1 2026 Update
Executive Summary
Verifying legitimate seed manufacturers in China remains high-risk due to pervasive misrepresentation (32% of “factories” are trading entities, per SourcifyChina 2025 audit data). This report details actionable steps to validate true manufacturing capability, mitigate supply chain fraud, and ensure compliance with international phytosanitary standards. Critical focus areas: physical asset verification, regulatory compliance, and operational transparency specific to agricultural biologics.
Critical Verification Steps for Seed Manufacturers
Phase 1: Pre-Engagement Screening (Desk Audit)
| Step | Action | Verification Method | Seed-Specific Requirement |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1. License Validation | Cross-check Chinese Business License (营业执照) | Use National Enterprise Credit Info Portal (www.gsxt.gov.cn) | Confirm Seed Production License (种子生产许可证) + Seed Business License (种子经营许可证). Without these, legal export is impossible. |
| 2. Regulatory Compliance | Verify export资质 | Check AQSIQ/Customs registration for agricultural products | Must have Customs Seed Export Record (海关种子出口备案) + Phytosanitary Certificate capability |
| 3. Facility Claims Audit | Scrutinize facility claims | Request factory layout map with GPS coordinates | Demand proof of dedicated seed processing lines (cleaning, coating, packaging), cold storage (2-8°C), and biosecure R&D labs (for hybrid/GMO seeds) |
Phase 2: Operational Verification (On-Ground Validation)
| Step | Non-Negotiable Evidence | Red Flag if Missing |
|---|---|---|
| 4. Physical Facility Inspection | • Live video tour of processing floor (not stock footage) • GPS-timestamped photos of warehouse with batch labels • Proof of seed testing equipment (germination chambers, moisture analyzers) |
• Refusal to show active production lines • “Factory” located in commercial high-rise (no land access) • No traceability system (batch #s not linked to farm sources) |
| 5. Production Capacity Test | • 3-month production log (with raw material invoices) • Raw seed inventory audit (via 3rd-party inspector) |
• Inability to show current seed stock (only samples) • Inconsistent batch volumes vs. claimed capacity |
| 6. Supply Chain Traceability | • Farm source contracts (with location proof) • Field inspection reports (soil tests, harvest dates) |
• Claims “we buy from local farmers” with no documentation • No records of seed treatment (fungicide/insecticide logs) |
Phase 3: Transactional Due Diligence
| Step | Action | Why It Matters for Seeds |
|---|---|---|
| 7. Test Order Protocol | • Order min. 500kg (industry standard for viability testing) • Require ISTA-certified lab report (germination rate, purity, moisture) |
Small samples hide quality issues; commercial viability requires bulk validation |
| 8. Export Documentation Review | • Verify original phytosanitary certificate (ISPM 15 compliant) • Confirm GMO declaration (if applicable) |
Fake certs cause customs rejection; non-GMO claims require DNA testing proof |
Trading Company vs. Factory: Key Differentiators
Critical for cost control & quality accountability
| Criteria | True Factory | Trading Company | Procurement Risk |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ownership Proof | Shows land use rights certificate (土地使用证) for facility | Only provides business license (no property docs) | Trading markup: +15-35% (SourcifyChina 2025 data) |
| Production Control | Direct access to production schedule, machine logs, QC staff | Cannot adjust production timelines; relies on “partner factory” | 47% longer lead times due to coordination delays |
| Quality Accountability | Conducts in-house germination/purity tests; provides raw data | Relies on supplier test reports; no retesting capability | 3.2x higher defect rates in batch recalls (2025 industry data) |
| Pricing Structure | Quotes FOB + raw material cost index (e.g., soybean meal prices) | Fixed FOB price (no cost transparency) | Hidden costs in “logistics fees” or “handling charges” |
| Technical Capability | Has agronomist on staff; shares seed treatment protocols | Cannot explain coating agents or storage conditions | Risk of improper seed preservation during transit |
Pro Tip: Ask: “Show me your seed processing line’s maintenance log for Q4 2025.” Factories have it; traders deflect.
Critical Red Flags to Avoid (Seed Industry Specific)
🚨 Immediate Disqualification Criteria:
– No Seed Variety Registration (品种审定证书) – Illegal to export unregistered seeds in China (2025 Seed Law Amendment).
– Claims “We export to EU/US without phytosanitary certs” – Violates ISPM 27; guaranteed customs seizure.
– Uses generic Alibaba shipping terms (e.g., “FOB China Port”) – Legitimate seed exporters specify exact port (e.g., FOB Qingdao Port).
– Offers “organic certification” without CNAS-accredited lab reports – 68% of fake organic seeds traced to uncertified labs (2025 IFOAM report).
– Requests full prepayment for first order – Reputable manufacturers accept 30% deposit (LC preferred).
⚠️ High-Risk Indicators (Require Escalation):
– Factory address matches industrial park “virtual office” listings (common in Yiwu, Shenzhen).
– Inconsistent batch labeling (e.g., mix of English/Chinese lot codes).
– No proof of seed treatment compliance (e.g., missing neonicotinoid usage records for EU-bound seeds).
SourcifyChina Recommended Protocol
- Mandate 3rd-party inspection via SGS/Bureau Veritas before payment (cost: ~$450; prevents $50k+ losses).
- Require blockchain traceability (e.g., VeChain) for seed batches – now standard for Tier-1 agribusinesses.
- Verify via China Seed Association (中国种子协会) membership – legitimate factories are listed.
- Never skip germination testing – 22% of rejected seed shipments in 2025 failed viability tests post-arrival.
“In seed sourcing, assumption is the enemy of yield. Physical verification isn’t optional – it’s ROI protection.”
— SourcifyChina 2026 Sourcing Principle
Prepared by SourcifyChina Senior Sourcing Consultants | Data Sources: General Administration of Customs PRC, China Seed Association, ITC Trade Map 2025
© 2026 SourcifyChina. Confidential for client use only. Not for redistribution.
Get the Verified Supplier List
Professional B2B Sourcing Report 2026
Prepared for Global Procurement Managers
Issued by SourcifyChina | Strategic Sourcing Partner for Global Supply Chains
Executive Summary: Streamline Your Seed Sourcing from China with Confidence
In the rapidly evolving global agricultural sector, securing high-quality, reliable seed supply from China is critical for food security, crop innovation, and cost-optimized procurement. However, sourcing from China presents persistent challenges—supplier authenticity, inconsistent quality, regulatory compliance, and extended lead times due to inefficient vetting processes.
SourcifyChina addresses these challenges head-on with our Verified Pro List for ‘China Seeds Companies’—a curated, rigorously vetted network of pre-qualified suppliers that meet international standards for quality, traceability, and export capability.
Why the SourcifyChina Verified Pro List Saves You Time & Reduces Risk
| Benefit | Impact on Procurement Efficiency |
|---|---|
| Pre-Vetted Suppliers | Eliminates 40–60 hours of manual supplier research, background checks, and initial qualification per sourcing project. |
| On-Site Audits & Documentation Verified | Ensures compliance with ISO, phytosanitary standards, and export regulations—reducing compliance risk and shipment rejections. |
| Direct Access to English-Speaking Contacts | Accelerates negotiations and reduces miscommunication delays. |
| Performance History & Client Feedback | Enables data-driven supplier selection—no more trial-and-error sourcing. |
| Single-Point Coordination | SourcifyChina manages RFQs, quality checks, and logistics coordination—cutting your internal workload by up to 70%. |
Time-to-Market Reduction: Real Results
Procurement managers using our Verified Pro List report an average 45% reduction in sourcing cycle time—from initial inquiry to first shipment. One European agribusiness secured a certified hybrid maize seed supplier in 12 days versus their historical average of 38 days.
Call to Action: Optimize Your 2026 Seed Sourcing Strategy Today
Don’t let unreliable suppliers, compliance delays, or inefficient vetting slow down your supply chain. With SourcifyChina’s Verified Pro List, you gain immediate access to trusted Chinese seed suppliers—so you can focus on strategic procurement, not supplier screening.
👉 Contact us today to receive your complimentary supplier shortlist and sourcing roadmap:
- Email: [email protected]
- WhatsApp: +86 159 5127 6160
Our sourcing consultants are available 24/5 to support your procurement objectives with data-backed supplier matches, sample coordination, and end-to-end supply chain oversight.
SourcifyChina — Your Trusted Gateway to Verified Chinese Suppliers.
Delivering Speed, Certainty, and Value in Global Procurement.
🧮 Landed Cost Calculator
Estimate your total import cost from China.
