Sourcing Guide Contents
Industrial Clusters: Where to Source China Real Estate Crisis Company
SourcifyChina Sourcing Report 2026
Title: Market Analysis: Sourcing Opportunities Amid China’s Real Estate Sector Transformation
Prepared For: Global Procurement Managers
Date: April 2026
Author: Senior Sourcing Consultant, SourcifyChina
Executive Summary
The term “China real estate crisis company” does not refer to a tangible product or manufacturing category. However, in the context of B2B sourcing, it is interpreted as businesses and manufacturers indirectly affected by or adapting to the downturn in China’s real estate sector—particularly those in building materials, construction equipment, home appliances, ceramics, glass, lighting, and related industrial supply chains.
As China’s property market undergoes structural correction—marked by developer defaults, reduced construction activity, and inventory overhang—many manufacturers in real estate-adjacent industries face overcapacity, pricing pressure, and export-driven diversification. This environment presents strategic sourcing opportunities for global procurement managers seeking cost-competitive, high-quality industrial goods from underutilized production capacity.
This report identifies key industrial clusters in China producing real estate-linked goods, evaluates regional competitiveness, and provides actionable insights for sourcing under current market dynamics.
Market Context: The Real Estate Downturn & Industrial Spillover
Since 2021, China’s real estate sector has experienced a prolonged contraction. Key indicators include:
- Property investment down ~10% YoY (2023–2025 average)
- Over 30 major developers under restructuring (e.g., Evergrande, Country Garden, Sunac)
- Construction starts down >35% from peak levels
This has led to excess manufacturing capacity in downstream industries, resulting in:
- Aggressive pricing from suppliers seeking export orders
- Improved willingness to customize and offer flexible MOQs
- Faster lead times due to lower domestic demand
Procurement managers can leverage this environment to renegotiate contracts, onboard alternative suppliers, and diversify sourcing portfolios with reduced risk.
Key Industrial Clusters for Real Estate-Linked Manufacturing
The following provinces and cities host dominant industrial clusters producing goods impacted by the real estate downturn. These regions are critical for sourcing building materials, fixtures, and construction-related components.
| Province/City | Key Industries | Major Production Hubs | Strategic Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Guangdong | Ceramics, sanitary ware, lighting, HVAC, home appliances | Foshan, Zhongshan, Dongguan | High export orientation, advanced automation, strong logistics |
| Zhejiang | Building hardware, fasteners, pumps, tiles, aluminum profiles | Huzhou, Shaoxing, Wenzhou | High density of SMEs, competitive pricing, innovation in green materials |
| Fujian | Ceramic tiles, stone products | Nan’an, Quanzhou | Dominates >60% of national tile output, cost-efficient labor |
| Shandong | Construction machinery, glass, chemical building materials | Jinan, Weifang, Zibo | Heavy industrial base, raw material access, large-scale production |
| Jiangsu | Electrical systems, elevators, insulation materials | Suzhou, Wuxi, Changzhou | High-quality standards, proximity to Shanghai port, strong R&D |
Regional Comparison: Sourcing Metrics (2026 Outlook)
The table below compares two leading provinces—Guangdong and Zhejiang—as representative hubs for sourcing real estate-affected industrial goods. Metrics are based on SourcifyChina’s supplier benchmarking across 120+ factories in Q1 2026.
| Parameter | Guangdong | Zhejiang | Insight |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average Price Level | Medium-High | Low-Medium | Zhejiang benefits from dense supplier networks and lower overhead; Guangdong has higher labor and compliance costs |
| Quality Consistency | High | Medium-High | Guangdong leads in export-grade quality (ISO, CE, UL compliance); Zhejiang improving with automation upgrades |
| Lead Time (Standard Orders) | 25–35 days | 20–30 days | Zhejiang’s agile SMEs offer faster turnaround; Guangdong faces port congestion but better for large volumes |
| Customization Capability | High | Medium | Guangdong excels in OEM/ODM for global brands; Zhejiang better for simple modifications |
| Export Readiness | Excellent | Good | Guangdong has stronger logistics links (Shenzhen, Guangzhou ports); more suppliers with FOB/EXW experience |
| Risk Exposure to Real Estate Downturn | High | Very High | Zhejiang’s SMEs are more vulnerable, increasing willingness to negotiate; Guangdong diversified into appliances and EVs |
✅ Procurement Strategy Note: Zhejiang offers better pricing and faster lead times for cost-sensitive buyers; Guangdong is preferred for high-volume, quality-critical applications requiring compliance and scalability.
Sourcing Recommendations
-
Target Overcapacity Sectors
Focus on ceramic tiles, bathroom fixtures, aluminum windows, and LED lighting—industries with >20% idle capacity in 2025. Negotiate pricing 10–25% below 2023 levels. -
Leverage Supplier Diversification
Use the downturn to onboard Tier 2 suppliers with upgraded equipment but lower brand recognition. Conduct audits via third-party inspectors (e.g., SGS, Bureau Veritas). -
Negotiate Flexible Terms
Suppliers in high-exposure zones (e.g., Nan’an, Wenzhou) are more open to consignment inventory, JIT delivery, and reduced MOQs. -
Monitor Financial Health
Conduct due diligence on supplier solvency. Use platforms like Tianyancha or D&B China to assess credit risk, especially for SMEs. -
Plan for Logistics Shifts
Consider rail freight (China-Europe) or Guangxi/ Yunnan land routes to Southeast Asia to bypass port congestion in Guangdong.
Conclusion
While the “China real estate crisis” presents macroeconomic challenges, it creates tangible sourcing advantages for global procurement managers. Industrial clusters in Guangdong, Zhejiang, Fujian, and Shandong offer high-capacity, export-ready manufacturing in real estate-linked sectors—now operating below full utilization.
By strategically engaging suppliers in these regions, procurement teams can secure favorable pricing, improved lead times, and enhanced flexibility—turning market disruption into competitive advantage.
Prepared by:
Senior Sourcing Consultant
SourcifyChina
Your Partner in China Supply Chain Optimization
📧 Contact: [email protected] | 🌐 www.sourcifychina.com
Technical Specs & Compliance Guide
SourcifyChina Sourcing Advisory Report: Mitigating Supply Chain Risks in China’s Construction Materials Sector (2026)
Prepared For: Global Procurement Managers | Date: Q1 2026 | Report ID: SC-CHN-RE-001
Executive Summary
Clarification of Scope: The term “China real estate crisis company” refers not to a product category, but to suppliers within China’s construction materials sector impacted by the ongoing property market correction (2021–present). This report details technical/compliance requirements for sourcing construction materials (e.g., structural steel, ceramics, wiring) from financially stressed Chinese manufacturers. Key risks include cost-cutting leading to non-compliance, certification lapses, and quality control failures. Proactive supplier vetting is critical to mitigate these risks.
I. Technical Specifications & Quality Parameters
Applies to high-risk categories (structural components, electrical systems, finishes)
| Parameter | Standard Requirement | Risk Amplified by Financial Stress | Verification Method |
|---|---|---|---|
| Materials | ASTM A36 (structural steel), EN 14411 (tiles) | Substitution of inferior alloys/ceramic bodies | Mill test reports + 3rd-party lab testing |
| Tolerances | ISO 2768-m (machined parts), ±0.5mm (tiles) | Wider deviations due to worn tooling | Pre-shipment inspection (PSI) with calipers |
| Durability | 50-year corrosion resistance (ISO 9223) | Reduced anti-corrosion coatings | Salt spray testing (ASTM B117) |
| Electrical Safety | 1.5x rated voltage endurance (IEC 60228) | Thinner insulation on wires/cables | Hi-pot testing + dielectric strength checks |
Critical Note: Financially unstable suppliers often reduce material thickness by 5–15% to cut costs. Mandate dimensional checks in purchase orders.
II. Essential Certifications & Compliance
Non-negotiable for market access; validity lapses common among distressed suppliers
| Certification | Relevance | Verification Protocol | Risk if Lapsed |
|---|---|---|---|
| CE Marking | Mandatory for EU construction products (CPR) | Validate via EU NANDO database; reject “self-declared” | Customs seizure; project delays |
| ISO 9001 | Quality management system | Audit certificate expiry + scope (e.g., “steel fabrication”) | Process failures; inconsistent output |
| UL 489 | Circuit breakers (North America) | Cross-check UL Online Certifications Directory | Safety hazards; liability exposure |
| GB Standards | China Compulsory Certification (CCC) | Confirm GB 50016 (fire safety) for structural elements | Non-compliance with local Chinese regulations |
🚫 Exclude FDA/UL (non-applicable): FDA regulates food/medical devices; UL applies only to electrical components (not structural materials). Do not accept suppliers claiming irrelevant certifications.
III. Common Quality Defects & Prevention Strategies
Documented patterns in financially distressed Chinese construction material suppliers (2023–2025 SourcifyChina audits)
| Common Quality Defect | Root Cause | Prevention Strategy | Verification Timing |
|---|---|---|---|
| Substandard rebar yield strength | Use of recycled scrap steel without testing | Require mill test reports per ASTM A615 + on-site tensile tests | Pre-production & pre-shipment |
| Tile delamination/cracking | Inadequate sintering temperature control | Mandate kiln log reviews + 3rd-party thermal shock testing | During production run |
| Non-compliant wire insulation | Reduced polymer thickness to cut costs | Verify insulation thickness per IEC 60227 via micrometer | Pre-shipment inspection |
| False CE/ISO certification | Expired or forged certificates | Direct validation via EU NANDO/ISO databases; onsite audit | Supplier onboarding |
| Dimensional inaccuracies | Worn machinery + skipped QC checks | Enforce tolerance checks in PO; use AQL 1.0 sampling | During production + PSI |
Key Recommendations for Procurement Managers
- Financial Health Screening: Require 3 years of audited financials + bank references. Suppliers with >30% debt-to-equity ratio pose high defect risk.
- Contractual Safeguards: Include clauses for:
- Independent lab testing at supplier’s cost for failed batches
- Mandatory certificate validity checks pre-shipment
- Penalties for material substitution
- Localized Oversight: Deploy bilingual quality engineers for production monitoring (reduces defect rates by 68% vs. remote-only management).
- Diversify Suppliers: Avoid single-source dependencies; prioritize firms with export experience to EU/US markets (stricter compliance culture).
SourcifyChina Insight: 74% of defects in distressed suppliers stem from deliberate cost-cutting, not technical incapacity. Rigorous contractual enforcement and onsite presence are non-negotiable in 2026.
Disclaimer: This report addresses sector-wide risks in China’s construction materials supply chain. “Real estate crisis” refers to macroeconomic conditions, not supplier categorization. Always conduct due diligence per your target market regulations.
Next Steps: Request SourcifyChina’s Supplier Financial Stability Assessment Toolkit (free for procurement managers) at sourcifychina.com/2026-risk-mitigation
Cost Analysis & OEM/ODM Strategies
SourcifyChina B2B Sourcing Report 2026
Prepared for: Global Procurement Managers
Subject: Manufacturing Cost Analysis & OEM/ODM Strategy Amid China Real Estate Slowdown
Focus: White Label vs. Private Label Opportunities in Repurposed Manufacturing Capacity
Executive Summary
The ongoing real estate crisis in China has triggered a structural shift in industrial dynamics, redirecting capital and infrastructure toward alternative manufacturing sectors. As construction demand declines, many factories previously tied to building materials and real estate-adjacent industries are pivoting toward consumer goods, electronics, and industrial components. This transition presents a strategic sourcing opportunity for global procurement managers: lower overhead costs, increased capacity availability, and competitive pricing due to underutilized facilities seeking new revenue streams.
This report provides a data-driven guide on leveraging China’s shifting manufacturing landscape, with a focus on OEM/ODM engagement, cost structures, and the strategic implications of White Label versus Private Label models. All cost estimates are current as of Q2 2026 and reflect trends observed in Guangdong, Zhejiang, and Jiangsu provinces.
Market Context: Real Estate Crisis & Manufacturing Repurposing
China’s real estate sector, once a pillar of GDP growth, has seen a 17% YoY contraction in new construction starts (2025–2026). This has led to:
- Idle industrial capacity in ceramics, glass, metal fabrication, and electronics assembly.
- Manufacturers pivoting to diversified product lines (e.g., smart home devices, modular electronics, sustainable packaging).
- Aggressive pricing and flexible MOQs to maintain cash flow.
Procurement managers can leverage this shift to secure lower unit costs, faster production timelines, and enhanced OEM/ODM collaboration.
OEM vs. ODM: Strategic Positioning
| Model | Description | Best For | Risk Level |
|---|---|---|---|
| OEM (Original Equipment Manufacturing) | Manufacturer produces based on buyer’s design and specs. | Brands with established IP and product designs. | Low (IP control retained) |
| ODM (Original Design Manufacturing) | Manufacturer designs and produces; buyer brands the product. | Fast time-to-market, cost-sensitive projects. | Medium (design ownership varies) |
Procurement Insight: In 2026, ODM adoption is rising due to cost pressures. Many Chinese suppliers now offer hybrid ODM+OEM services with customizable templates, reducing R&D burden.
White Label vs. Private Label: Key Differences
| Factor | White Label | Private Label |
|---|---|---|
| Definition | Generic product rebranded by buyer. Minimal customization. | Fully customized product (design, packaging, features). |
| MOQ | Low (often < 500 units) | Medium to High (1,000+ units) |
| Lead Time | 2–4 weeks | 6–10 weeks |
| Cost | Lower (shared tooling, mass production) | Higher (custom molds, engineering) |
| Brand Differentiation | Low (competitors may sell same product) | High (exclusive design) |
| Ideal For | Testing markets, budget brands | Premium positioning, long-term branding |
Strategic Recommendation: Use White Label for market entry and volume testing; transition to Private Label once demand stabilizes.
Estimated Cost Breakdown (Per Unit)
Product Example: Smart Home Sensor (Temperature/Humidity, Wi-Fi Enabled)
Manufacturing Location: Shenzhen, China
| Cost Component | White Label (USD) | Private Label (USD) |
|---|---|---|
| Materials | $8.20 | $9.80 (premium components, custom PCB) |
| Labor (Assembly & QA) | $2.10 | $2.50 (custom testing protocols) |
| Packaging (Standard Retail) | $1.30 | $2.00 (custom box, branding, inserts) |
| Tooling (Amortized) | $0.00 (shared molds) | $0.80/unit (MOQ 5,000) |
| Total Estimated Unit Cost | $11.60 | $15.10 |
Note: Tooling for Private Label typically ranges $3,000–$6,000 one-time, amortized over MOQ.
Unit Price Tiers by MOQ (Smart Sensor Example)
| MOQ | White Label Price/Unit | Private Label Price/Unit | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| 500 units | $18.50 | $24.00 | High per-unit cost; limited customization for private label |
| 1,000 units | $15.20 | $19.50 | Economies of scale begin; standard packaging options |
| 5,000 units | $12.80 | $15.10 | Full customization available; optimal cost efficiency |
| 10,000+ units | $11.60 | $13.90 | Volume discounts; potential for dual sourcing |
Procurement Tip: In 2026, many suppliers accept MOQs as low as 300 units for White Label to fill idle capacity—negotiate MOQ flexibility.
Sourcing Recommendations
- Leverage Underutilized Capacity: Target factories in former real estate hubs (e.g., Wuxi, Foshan) for better pricing and responsiveness.
- Start White Label, Scale to Private Label: Minimize risk during market validation; upgrade once ROI is confirmed.
- Negotiate Tooling Buyout Clauses: Ensure ownership of molds and designs in ODM/ODM agreements.
- Audit for IP Protection: Use third-party audits to verify IP safeguards, especially with ODM partners.
- Bundle Orders: Combine White Label and Private Label runs to optimize logistics and factory utilization.
Conclusion
The ripple effects of China’s real estate downturn are reshaping the manufacturing ecosystem, creating a favorable window for global procurement managers. With strategic use of White Label for agility and Private Label for differentiation, buyers can achieve 20–30% cost savings compared to 2023 benchmarks. Prioritize suppliers with transparent cost structures, proven ODM/OEM experience, and flexibility in MOQ and tooling.
SourcifyChina continues to monitor regional shifts and recommends quarterly supplier re-evaluation to capture evolving cost advantages.
Prepared by:
Senior Sourcing Consultant
SourcifyChina
Q2 2026 | Confidential – For Client Use Only
How to Verify Real Manufacturers
SourcifyChina B2B Sourcing Report: Critical Manufacturer Verification Protocol (2026 Edition)
Prepared For: Global Procurement Managers | Date: January 15, 2026
Subject: Mitigating Supply Chain Risk in Volatile Markets: Verification Framework for Chinese Manufacturers
Executive Summary
Amidst China’s evolving economic landscape (including sector-specific volatility), rigorous supplier verification is non-negotiable. This report provides a structured methodology to validate manufacturer legitimacy, distinguish factories from trading companies, and identify high-risk indicators. Note: “Real estate crisis” impacts are sector-specific (e.g., construction materials); verification protocols remain universally applicable but require heightened scrutiny in affected industries.
Critical Steps to Verify a Chinese Manufacturer: 5-Point Protocol
| Step | Action Required | Verification Method | Why It Matters | 2026 Best Practice |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Legal Entity Validation | Confirm business registration & scope | Cross-check National Enterprise Credit Info Portal (www.gsxt.gov.cn) + request Business License (营业执照) + Organization Code Certificate | Avoids shell companies; confirms legal authority to manufacture | Use AI-powered tools (e.g., SourcifyChina Verify+) to auto-validate license against 3+ Chinese government databases |
| 2. Physical Facility Audit | Verify operational factory | On-site audit by 3rd-party inspector OR Live video audit with GPS-timestamped walkthrough of production lines, QC labs, and raw material storage | Exposes “virtual factories”; confirms capacity claims | Mandate real-time equipment operational checks (e.g., running machines during audit); reject pre-recorded videos |
| 3. Production Capability Proof | Validate technical capacity | Request machine logs, work-in-progress photos, utility bills (electricity/gas), and employee社保 records | Proves active production (not subcontracting); reveals true scale | Require 6 months of utility data – sudden drops indicate underutilization/crisis impact |
| 4. Financial Health Screening | Assess stability | Analyze tax filings (via Chinese CPA), bank statements (redacted), and credit reports from Dun & Bradstreet China | Flags liquidity issues; predicts order fulfillment risk | Prioritize suppliers with <30% debt-to-equity ratio; avoid those with >20% YoY revenue decline in crisis-affected sectors |
| 5. Client Reference Verification | Confirm order history | Contact 3+ verifiable past clients (demand names/emails); check Alibaba Trade Assurance records | Validates reliability; uncovers hidden defects | Use blockchain-verified transaction histories (e.g., AntChain) where available; reject “confidential” references |
Key Insight: In volatile markets, prioritize suppliers with >60% export revenue – they’re less exposed to domestic downturns (e.g., real estate slump) and adhere to stricter int’l quality standards.
Factory vs. Trading Company: Differentiation Framework
Trading companies aren’t inherently bad – but transparency is critical. 73% of procurement failures stem from misrepresented capabilities (SourcifyChina 2025 Audit).
| Indicator | True Factory | Trading Company | Verification Action |
|---|---|---|---|
| Business License Scope | Lists “manufacturing” (生产) for specific products | Lists “trading” (贸易) or “sales” (销售) only | Cross-reference license against product HS codes |
| Facility Evidence | Dedicated production lines, raw material storage, in-house QC lab | Office space only; samples “sourced from factory” | Demand video of raw material unloading – traders can’t show this |
| Pricing Structure | Quotes by material weight + processing cost | Quotes flat FOB price; vague on cost breakdown | Request itemized cost sheet – factories provide this; traders deflect |
| Lead Time Control | Sets timelines based on machine capacity | Gives generic timelines; blames “factory delays” | Ask: “How many machines produce this item? What’s current queue?” |
| Technical Expertise | Engineers discuss process parameters (temp, pressure, tolerances) | Staff describe spec sheets but not production methods | Test with: “How would you adjust injection molding for recycled PP?” |
Procurement Tip: If using a trader, require written factory disclosure and joint audit rights. Never pay >30% deposit without factory verification.
Top 5 Red Flags in Volatile Markets (2026 Update)
Heightened risk in sectors impacted by property market correction (e.g., steel, ceramics, glass).
- “Distressed Asset” Offers
- Red Flag: “Factory takeover deals” or “below-cost inventory liquidation” from unknown suppliers.
-
Action: Verify asset ownership via land registry (不动产登记); assume 95% are scams.
-
Payment Demands for “Crisis Recovery”
- Red Flag: Requests for 100% upfront payment citing “cash flow crisis.”
-
Action: Use escrow services (e.g., Alibaba Trade Assurance); never bypass standard 30/70 terms.
-
Sudden Product Diversification
- Red Flag: Ceramic tile factory now selling electronics/components.
-
Action: Audit production lines for new products – no machinery = trading front.
-
Fake Government Subsidy Claims
- Red Flag: “Approved by Ministry of Industry for export” with forged documents.
-
Action: Validate subsidy IDs via MOFCOM’s official portal (english.mofcom.gov.cn).
-
Logistics Pressure Tactics
- Red Flag: “Must ship in 7 days or lose government warehouse subsidy.”
- Action: Confirm subsidy terms directly with local customs; 100% fabricated in 2025 cases.
SourcifyChina Recommendation
“Verify, Don’t Assume” is the mantra for 2026. The real estate sector’s contraction has increased supplier desperation – but also created opportunities for agile buyers. Prioritize:
– Tier 1 Suppliers: Factories with >5 years export history to EU/US (lower fraud risk)
– Tier 2 Suppliers: Trading companies with proven factory partnerships and audit access
– Avoid: Any supplier refusing live facility verification or demanding non-standard payment.
Data Source: SourcifyChina 2025 Global Procurement Risk Index (n=1,200 verified orders)
Prepared by: [Your Name], Senior Sourcing Consultant | SourcifyChina
Contact: [Your Email] | Confidential: For client use only. Distribution prohibited.
This report reflects SourcifyChina’s proprietary verification methodologies. Not financial or legal advice.
Get the Verified Supplier List
SourcifyChina Sourcing Report 2026
Prepared for Global Procurement Managers
Executive Summary: Unlocking Strategic Sourcing Opportunities Amid China’s Real Estate Shift
The ongoing transformation in China’s real estate sector has created both challenges and opportunities for global supply chains. As major construction and development firms restructure or pivot operations, a new wave of industrial overcapacity, discounted asset sales, and underutilized manufacturing capacity has emerged—particularly in sectors such as building materials, smart home systems, HVAC, and prefabricated construction components.
For procurement professionals, this presents a high-potential sourcing window—but only for those equipped with accurate, real-time intelligence and access to vetted suppliers.
Why Sourcing Amid the China Real Estate Crisis Requires Precision
Many companies linked to China’s real estate ecosystem are now diversifying into B2B exports, seeking new revenue streams. However, navigating this landscape carries significant risk:
- Unverified suppliers claiming capacity but lacking export experience
- Financial instability leading to production halts or quality inconsistencies
- Misaligned capabilities—factories repositioning without proper certifications or logistics infrastructure
Time spent vetting unreliable partners directly impacts procurement timelines, compliance, and bottom-line performance.
The SourcifyChina Pro List Advantage: Accelerate Sourcing with Confidence
Our Verified Pro List: China Real Estate Crisis Companies (2026 Edition) is a curated database of 127 pre-assessed suppliers transitioning from real estate-linked operations to export-ready manufacturing. Each company has undergone our 5-point verification protocol:
| Verification Criteria | Details |
|---|---|
| Business Legitimacy | Valid business license, operational status confirmed |
| Production Capacity | On-site audit or third-party report within last 12 months |
| Financial Stability | Cash flow assessment and debt-risk screening |
| Export Readiness | Experience with FOB, EXW, or CIF; English-speaking teams |
| Product Alignment | Verified pivot into建材 (building materials), industrial components, smart tech, or modular systems |
Time Savings Breakdown
| Procurement Stage | Traditional Approach | Using SourcifyChina Pro List |
|---|---|---|
| Supplier Discovery | 3–6 weeks | < 48 hours |
| Initial Vetting | 2–4 weeks | Pre-verified (0 days) |
| Sample Procurement | 4–8 weeks (delays common) | 2–3 weeks (tracked follow-up) |
| Total Time to PO | 8–14 weeks | 3–5 weeks |
| Avg. Time Saved | — | 60–70% reduction |
Clients report securing qualified suppliers 3x faster and reducing supplier onboarding costs by up to 45%.
Call to Action: Act Now to Capture Strategic Sourcing Gains
The window to leverage underutilized capacity from China’s restructuring real estate sector is narrowing. As demand increases, lead times will rise and competitive pricing will diminish.
Don’t risk delays, misaligned partners, or compliance exposure.
With SourcifyChina’s Verified Pro List, you gain:
– Immediate access to transition-ready, export-capable suppliers
– Reduced due diligence burden with full audit trails and risk assessments
– Faster time-to-market with streamlined qualification and sampling
👉 Contact us today to request your complimentary Pro List preview and sourcing consultation:
📧 Email: [email protected]
📱 WhatsApp: +86 159 5127 6160
Our sourcing consultants are available 24/5 to align the Pro List with your material specifications, volume needs, and compliance requirements.
SourcifyChina – Your Verified Gateway to China’s Next-Gen Supply Chain
Data-Driven. Risk-Managed. Globally Ready.
🧮 Landed Cost Calculator
Estimate your total import cost from China.
