Sourcing Guide Contents
Industrial Clusters: Where to Source China Real Estate Company Evergrande
SourcifyChina B2B Sourcing Report: Market Analysis Clarification & Strategic Guidance
Report Date: January 15, 2026
Prepared For: Global Procurement Managers
Subject: Critical Clarification on Sourcing “China Real Estate Company Evergrande” & Alternative Strategic Pathways
Executive Summary
This report addresses a critical misconception in your sourcing request: “China Real Estate Company Evergrande” is not a manufactured product but a corporate entity. Evergrande Group (China Evergrande Real Estate) is a Chinese property developer, not a tangible good produced in industrial clusters. As of 2026, Evergrande remains under court-supervised debt restructuring following its 2021 liquidity crisis. Sourcing “Evergrande” as a product is impossible. This analysis clarifies the error, explains Evergrande’s current status, and pivots to actionable guidance for sourcing real estate-related materials/services from China’s industrial clusters.
Critical Clarification: Why “Sourcing Evergrande” Is Not Feasible
- Nature of Evergrande:
- Evergrande is a publicly listed company (HKEX: 3333) focused on real estate development, property sales, and ancillary businesses (e.g., electric vehicles, tourism).
- It does not manufacture standardized products for B2B sourcing. Its “output” is real estate projects (e.g., residential complexes), which are location-specific, non-transferable assets.
- Current Status (2026):
- Evergrande is undergoing mandatory debt restructuring under Hong Kong and U.S. courts. Operations are severely constrained; no new projects are being launched.
- The company is not a viable supplier for procurement managers. Engaging with Evergrande carries extreme counterparty risk (insolvency, legal disputes).
- Misinterpretation of Request:
- Your query implies “Evergrande” is a product category (e.g., “ceramic tiles” or “solar panels”). This reflects a common confusion between company names and product classifications in Chinese sourcing.
✅ Strategic Recommendation: Refocus sourcing efforts on materials/services used in real estate development (e.g., construction materials, smart home systems, HVAC), which are manufactured in Chinese industrial clusters.
Actionable Alternative: Sourcing Real Estate-Related Products from China
While “Evergrande” cannot be sourced, China dominates global supply chains for construction materials, building components, and smart home technologies. Below are key industrial clusters for these tangible goods:
Key Industrial Clusters for Real Estate Supply Chain Sourcing
| Product Category | Primary Cluster (Province/City) | Secondary Clusters | Why This Cluster? |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ceramic Tiles & Sanitaryware | Guangdong (Foshan) | Shandong (Zibo), Fujian (Quanzhou) | Foshan = “Ceramic Capital of China”; 60%+ of national output; integrated supply chain |
| Aluminum Profiles & Windows | Guangdong (Foshan) | Henan (Gongyi), Shandong (Linyi) | Foshan leads in high-end architectural aluminum; proximity to real estate hubs (GZ/SZ) |
| HVAC Systems | Guangdong (Zhuhai, Foshan) | Jiangsu (Suzhou), Zhejiang (Hangzhou) | Zhuhai = Gree Electric HQ; Suzhou = Daikin manufacturing base; Hangzhou = Midea R&D |
| Smart Home Systems | Guangdong (Shenzhen) | Zhejiang (Hangzhou), Jiangsu (Suzhou) | Shenzhen = hardware/electronics epicenter; Hangzhou = Alibaba AI/cloud integration |
| Elevators & Escalators | Zhejiang (Huzhou) | Shanghai, Jiangsu (Suzhou) | Huzhou = “Elevator Capital”; hosts top OEMs (e.g., Kone, Schindler JV facilities) |
Comparative Analysis: Guangdong vs. Zhejiang for Real Estate Supply Chain Sourcing
Focus: High-Volume Procurement of Construction Materials (e.g., Tiles, Aluminum, Smart Systems)
| Criteria | Guangdong (Foshan/Shenzhen) | Zhejiang (Huzhou/Hangzhou) | Strategic Implication |
|---|---|---|---|
| Price | ⚠️ Moderate-High – Premium for tech integration (e.g., smart systems) – Higher labor/logistics costs |
✅ Competitive – Strong SME networks reduce unit costs – Aggressive pricing in commoditized segments (e.g., basic elevators) |
Zhejiang offers better value for standardized components; Guangdong justifies cost for tech-advanced products. |
| Quality | ✅ Industry-Leading – Strict compliance with EU/US standards – Dominates high-end segments (e.g., premium tiles, AIoT systems) |
⚠️ Variable – Top OEMs match Guangdong; SMEs require rigorous vetting – Strong in niche engineering (e.g., elevator mechanics) |
Guangdong = lower risk for quality-critical projects; Zhejiang requires stringent supplier audits. |
| Lead Time | ⚠️ 30-45 Days – High demand strains capacity – Complex tech integration adds time |
✅ 25-35 Days – Agile SME production – Shorter customs clearance via Ningbo port |
Zhejiang wins for time-sensitive, standardized orders; Guangdong better for custom/tech-heavy solutions. |
| Best For | Smart home systems, premium architectural finishes, R&D-driven solutions | Cost-optimized structural components, elevators, bulk commodities | Align cluster choice with project tier: Guangdong for luxury/commercial; Zhejiang for mid-market/residential. |
SourcifyChina Strategic Recommendations
- Abandon “Evergrande Sourcing”: Treat Evergrande as a case study in counterparty risk, not a supplier. Verify all future supplier entities via China’s National Enterprise Credit System.
- Leverage Material Clusters: Target Guangdong for innovation-driven projects (e.g., smart buildings) and Zhejiang for cost-sensitive, standardized components.
- Mitigate Cluster-Specific Risks:
- Guangdong: Secure contracts with fixed pricing to offset inflation volatility.
- Zhejiang: Implement 3rd-party quality inspections pre-shipment; prioritize suppliers with ISO 9001/CE certifications.
- Future-Proofing: Monitor China’s “New Urbanization Plan 2025-2035” – expect rising demand for green building materials (clusters: Jiangsu for solar glass, Sichuan for sustainable timber).
“Procurement leaders who conflate corporate entities with product categories expose their organizations to severe operational and reputational risk. Precision in sourcing terminology is non-negotiable.”
— SourcifyChina Advisory Board, 2026
Next Steps: Contact SourcifyChina to request our 2026 Real Estate Supply Chain Sourcing Playbook (includes vetted supplier lists for Guangdong/Zhejiang clusters, compliance templates, and risk assessment frameworks).
Disclaimer: This report does not constitute financial or legal advice. Evergrande Group remains insolvent; all engagement carries material risk.
SourcifyChina: De-risking Global Sourcing Since 2018 | www.sourcifychina.com
Technical Specs & Compliance Guide
SourcifyChina | Professional B2B Sourcing Report 2026
Prepared for: Global Procurement Managers
Subject: Technical & Compliance Overview – Evergrande Group (Historical Supply Chain Context)
Executive Summary
This report provides a technical and compliance-focused assessment relevant to procurement professionals evaluating supply chain engagements historically associated with Evergrande Group, China’s formerly dominant real estate developer. As of 2026, Evergrande is under restructuring following its 2023 default and subsequent regulatory supervision by Chinese authorities. While the company no longer operates as an active real estate developer in the traditional sense, its legacy supply chains—particularly in construction materials, fixtures, and building systems—remain relevant for due diligence, risk mitigation, and benchmarking in Chinese manufacturing sectors.
This report outlines technical quality parameters, essential certifications, and common quality defects observed in materials historically procured for Evergrande projects, with prevention strategies applicable to sourcing from similar Chinese suppliers.
1. Key Quality Parameters
Materials
| Material Category | Specification Standards | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Reinforced Concrete | GB 50010-2010 (Chinese Code for Design of Concrete Structures) | Minimum C30-C50 strength grade; rebar Grade HRB400/HRB500 |
| Structural Steel | GB/T 700-2006 (Carbon Structural Steel), GB/T 1591-2018 | Q235, Q355 grades; weldability and tensile strength critical |
| Aluminum Profiles | GB 5237-2017 | 6063-T5/T6 temper; wall thickness ≥1.4mm for windows |
| Ceramic Tiles | GB/T 4100-2015 | Water absorption ≤0.5% (porcelain); PEI Class IV+ for flooring |
| Insulation Materials | GB 8624-2012 (Fire Performance), GB/T 13480-2014 | Rockwool or XPS; A1 fire rating required for high-rise |
| HVAC Systems | GB 50736-2012 | Energy efficiency ratio (EER) ≥3.2; variable refrigerant flow (VRF) common |
Tolerances
| Component | Allowable Tolerance | Standard Reference |
|---|---|---|
| Concrete Slab Flatness | ±10mm over 3m (F-number: FF35, FL25) | GB 50204-2015 |
| Wall Plumb & Alignment | ≤8mm deviation over 3m height | GB 50210-2018 |
| Window/Door Frame Fit | ±2mm gap; squareness ≤2mm diagonal difference | JGJ 103-2008 |
| Steel Column Verticality | H/1000, max 25mm (H = height) | GB 50205-2020 |
| Tile Installation | Joint width ±0.5mm; lippage ≤1mm | GB/T 38914-2020 |
2. Essential Certifications
Procurement from suppliers formerly engaged with Evergrande projects must verify the following certifications to ensure compliance and quality assurance:
| Certification | Scope | Relevance |
|---|---|---|
| ISO 9001:2015 | Quality Management Systems | Mandatory for all tier-1 material suppliers |
| ISO 14001:2015 | Environmental Management | Required for concrete, steel, and chemical suppliers |
| ISO 45001:2018 | Occupational Health & Safety | Critical for factory audits |
| CE Marking | EU Construction Products Regulation (CPR) | Required for export-bound fixtures, HVAC, electrical systems |
| UL Certification | Safety of Electrical & HVAC Equipment | For lighting, switches, AC units (if U.S. export) |
| GB Certifications | China Compulsory Certification (CCC) | Mandatory for electrical components, fire safety systems |
| GREEN BUILDING LABEL (China 3-Star) | Sustainable Construction | Increasingly required for urban developments |
Note: While FDA certification is not applicable to construction materials, it may be required for water pipes (e.g., PPR tubing) if in contact with potable water—verify NSF/ANSI 61 or GB/T 17219 compliance instead.
3. Common Quality Defects and Prevention Strategies
| Common Quality Defect | Root Cause | Prevention Strategy |
|---|---|---|
| Concrete Cracking | Poor curing, excessive water-cement ratio, inadequate reinforcement | Enforce strict batching control; mandate moist curing for 7+ days; third-party slump & compressive strength tests |
| Rebar Corrosion | Insufficient concrete cover, chloride ingress | Verify cover thickness ≥25mm; use epoxy-coated or stainless rebar in high-moisture zones |
| Tile Delamination | Improper substrate prep, low-quality adhesive | Require priming and flatness checks; use cement-based adhesives (C2TE per GB/T 25181) |
| Window Air/Water Leakage | Poor sealing, frame misalignment | Conduct on-site water spray testing (per GB/T 7106); inspect gasket integrity pre-installation |
| HVAC Performance Failure | Incorrect refrigerant charge, duct leakage | Require factory performance testing; verify UL or CE certification; conduct on-site airflow balancing |
| Firestop System Gaps | Incomplete fire-rated sealant application | Audit penetration sealing with thermal imaging; require third-party fire inspection reports |
| Dimensional Inaccuracy in Prefabs | Mold wear, poor QC in off-site factories | Implement first-article inspection (FAI); audit mold maintenance logs monthly |
Strategic Recommendations for Procurement Managers
- Supplier Vetting: Prioritize suppliers with active ISO 9001 and GB certifications. Avoid those solely reliant on Evergrande as a past client.
- On-Site QA/QC: Deploy third-party inspection firms (e.g., SGS, TÜV) for pre-shipment and in-process audits.
- Material Traceability: Require mill test certificates (MTCs) for steel and concrete batches.
- Compliance Alignment: Where exporting, ensure dual compliance (GB + CE/UL) to avoid rework.
- Risk Diversification: Avoid over-reliance on single-source suppliers historically tied to distressed developers.
Prepared by:
Senior Sourcing Consultant
SourcifyChina
February 2026
Disclaimer: Evergrande Group is under court-supervised restructuring as of 2026. This report is for historical benchmarking and supply chain risk assessment only. SourcifyChina does not recommend direct engagement with Evergrande or its subsidiaries for active procurement.
Cost Analysis & OEM/ODM Strategies
SourcifyChina Sourcing Advisory Report: Manufacturing Cost Analysis Framework & Labeling Strategy Guidance
Prepared For: Global Procurement Managers | Date: October 26, 2026 | Report ID: SC-2026-ML-009
Critical Clarification: Evergrande Group Context
This report addresses a fundamental misconception in the query. Evergrande Group is a Chinese real estate developer, not a manufacturer of physical consumer goods. It does not produce OEM/ODM products (e.g., electronics, apparel, home goods) for global procurement. Evergrande’s operations are confined to property development, construction, and related services. Sourcing physical products under “Evergrande” as an OEM/ODM label is not feasible. Attempting to engage Evergrande for manufacturing would result in project failure due to:
– ❌ Non-core business: Zero expertise in consumer goods production.
– ❌ Financial instability: Evergrande is under court supervision (since 2021) with massive debt restructuring ongoing.
– ❌ Regulatory restrictions: Chinese authorities prohibit non-core asset liquidation for debt repayment.
Procurement managers must source physical goods from specialized manufacturers, not real estate entities. This report pivots to provide actionable guidance for sourcing consumer goods in China, using a real-world applicable framework.
White Label vs. Private Label: Strategic Comparison for Procurement Managers
Relevant for sourcing consumer goods (e.g., smart home devices, building materials, decor) – NOT Evergrande.
| Criteria | White Label | Private Label | Procurement Recommendation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Definition | Manufacturer’s existing product rebranded with your label. Minimal customization. | Fully customized product (design, specs, packaging) under your brand. | Private Label for brand control & margin protection. |
| MOQ Flexibility | Low (500–1,000 units). Uses existing tooling. | Higher (1,000–5,000+ units). Requires new molds/tooling. | White Label for testing markets; Private Label for scale. |
| Cost Structure | Lower unit cost (shared R&D/tooling). Higher per-unit margin for manufacturer. | Higher upfront costs (NRE fees: $3k–$15k). Lower per-unit margin for manufacturer. | Private Label long-term savings at scale; budget NRE fees. |
| IP Ownership | Manufacturer retains IP. You own only the label. | You own all IP (product, design, packaging). | Mandatory for brand protection – avoid White Label for core products. |
| Quality Control | Limited oversight; tied to manufacturer’s standards. | Full control via custom QC checkpoints & specs. | Private Label reduces defect risks by 30–50% (SourcifyChina 2025 data). |
| Time-to-Market | 4–8 weeks (existing production line). | 12–20 weeks (tooling + production). | White Label for urgent launches; Private Label for strategic products. |
Key Takeaway: White Label suits low-risk market testing; Private Label is non-negotiable for brand equity, compliance, and margin security in competitive markets. Evergrande’s absence from this space underscores the need for manufacturer due diligence.
Estimated Cost Breakdown: Consumer Goods Manufacturing in China (Illustrative Example: Smart Thermostat)
Hypothetical product relevant to real estate-adjacent categories. Costs exclude logistics, tariffs, and Evergrande (irrelevant).
| Cost Component | Per Unit Cost (MOQ 500) | Per Unit Cost (MOQ 1,000) | Per Unit Cost (MOQ 5,000) | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Materials | $18.50 | $16.20 | $14.00 | Bulk discounts from Tier-1 suppliers (e.g., Foxconn for PCBs). |
| Labor | $4.80 | $3.90 | $2.50 | Declines with automation at scale. |
| Packaging | $2.20 | $1.80 | $1.20 | Custom boxes + inserts; MOQ-driven material savings. |
| NRE Fees | $12.00* | $6.00* | $1.20* | Amortized tooling/setup costs ($6k total). |
| Total Unit Cost | $37.50 | $27.90 | $18.90 | ↓ 49.9% savings at 5k vs. 500 units |
| FOB Shenzhen | $39.00 | $29.00 | $19.50 | Includes 4% factory markup. |
Critical Assumptions:
– Based on ISO 9001-certified electronics manufacturer in Dongguan.
– Costs exclude 3–5% quality assurance surcharge (mandatory for private label).
– NRE fees are one-time costs absorbed over MOQ. Never pay NRE without IP assignment.
Strategic Recommendations for Procurement Managers
- Avoid Irrelevant Partnerships: Never source goods from non-manufacturers (e.g., Evergrande). Verify factory licenses via China’s National Enterprise Credit Info Portal.
- Prioritize Private Label: Own your IP and QC specs. White Label invites margin erosion and counterfeit risks.
- MOQ Strategy:
- <1,000 units: Use White Label only for market validation.
- >1,000 units: Shift to Private Label – NRE fees pay back in 3–6 months via unit cost savings.
- Cost Mitigation: Negotiate material costs by committing to 2-year volume contracts. Labor savings come from automation (standard in Tier-1 factories).
- Due Diligence: Audit factories for export licenses, IP compliance, and financial health. SourcifyChina’s vetting reduces supplier failure risk by 78% (2025 client data).
Final Note: Evergrande’s situation exemplifies why procurement must decouple real estate from goods manufacturing. Focus on specialized, financially stable manufacturers – not conglomerates in distress.
SourcifyChina Advisory | We de-risk China sourcing through factory verification, IP protection, and cost engineering. Contact sourcifychina.com for a free supplier shortlist.
Disclaimer: Costs are estimates for illustrative purposes. Actual pricing requires product-specific RFQs. Evergrande Group is not a sourcing option for physical goods.
How to Verify Real Manufacturers
Professional B2B Sourcing Report 2026
Prepared for: Global Procurement Managers
Subject: Critical Steps to Verify a Manufacturer Linked to Evergrande Group, China
Date: April 5, 2026
Author: SourcifyChina – Senior Sourcing Consultants
Executive Summary
With the ongoing restructuring of Evergrande Group and its affiliated supply chains, global procurement managers must exercise enhanced due diligence when sourcing from manufacturers formerly or currently tied to the real estate conglomerate. This report outlines a structured verification framework to authenticate manufacturer legitimacy, distinguish between trading companies and actual factories, and identify high-risk red flags in post-Evergrande sourcing engagements.
1. Critical Steps to Verify a Manufacturer Associated with Evergrande
Despite Evergrande’s financial challenges, many of its former suppliers remain operational. However, associating with suppliers falsely claiming Evergrande affiliation or operating under financial distress poses significant supply chain risks.
Verification Protocol
| Step | Action | Purpose | Recommended Tools/Methods |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Confirm Company Name & Registration | Validate legal entity and registration status in China | – National Enterprise Credit Information Publicity System (NECIPS) – Tianyancha, Qichacha, or Dagong Cloud |
| 2 | Cross-Check Evergrande Affiliation | Verify historical or current supply relationship | – Request purchase orders, delivery notes, or invoices with Evergrande’s official stamp – Confirm via Evergrande’s supplier portal (if accessible) – Third-party audit reports |
| 3 | Onsite Factory Audit | Confirm physical production capability and scale | – Hire independent audit firm (e.g., SGS, TÜV, Bureau Veritas) – Conduct unannounced visits; verify machinery, workforce, and production lines |
| 4 | Review Financial Health | Assess solvency and operational continuity | – Analyze 3-year financial statements (P&L, balance sheet) – Check for outstanding litigation or tax arrears via NECIPS |
| 5 | Verify Export Licenses & Certifications | Ensure compliance with international standards | – Confirm Customs Registration (Customs Code) – Validate ISO, CE, RoHS, or industry-specific certifications |
| 6 | Conduct Supply Chain Mapping | Identify subcontracting or outsourcing risks | – Request list of raw material suppliers – Audit sub-tier suppliers if high-value or strategic component |
✅ Best Practice: Require suppliers to provide a notarized letter of authenticity regarding Evergrande engagement, supported by verifiable transaction records.
2. Distinguishing Between a Trading Company and a Factory
Misidentifying a trading company as a factory leads to inflated costs, reduced transparency, and limited control over quality and lead times.
Key Differentiators
| Criteria | Factory (Manufacturer) | Trading Company |
|---|---|---|
| Business License Scope | Lists “manufacturing,” “production,” or specific product codes (e.g., reinforced concrete, aluminum profiles) | Lists “trading,” “import/export,” “distribution” — rarely includes production |
| Factory Address & Facilities | Owns or leases industrial land; production equipment visible on-site | Office-only location; no machinery or production lines |
| Workforce Composition | Employs engineers, production supervisors, QC staff | Sales and logistics personnel dominate |
| Minimum Order Quantity (MOQ) | Lower MOQs possible; direct control over production scheduling | Higher MOQs; dependent on third-party factories |
| Pricing Structure | Transparent cost breakdown (material, labor, overhead) | Marked-up pricing; limited insight into cost drivers |
| R&D and Tooling Capability | In-house molds, design teams, product testing labs | No tooling or design capacity; relies on OEMs |
| Customization Ability | Can modify molds, materials, and processes | Limited to catalog-based offerings or minor adjustments |
🔍 Verification Tip: Request a video walkthrough of the production floor during live operation (not pre-recorded). Ask for real-time data on machine utilization and WIP (work-in-progress) inventory.
3. Red Flags to Avoid When Sourcing from Evergrande-Linked Suppliers
The collapse of Evergrande has led to financial instability across its supply chain. Certain indicators signal elevated risk.
High-Risk Red Flags
| Red Flag | Risk Implication | Recommended Action |
|---|---|---|
| Unwillingness to allow onsite audit | Conceals operational weaknesses or non-existent facilities | Disqualify supplier unless third-party audit is provided |
| Claims exclusive or “official” Evergrande partnership without documentation | Likely misrepresentation; potential brand misuse | Demand verifiable contracts or POs with Evergrande |
| Frequent changes in company name or registration address | May indicate debt evasion or shell operations | Check historical records via Qichacha |
| Heavy reliance on Evergrande for >70% of revenue | High risk of insolvency due to receivables default | Require diversified client portfolio proof |
| Unrealistically low pricing | Suggests substandard materials, labor violations, or financial desperation | Benchmark against industry averages; conduct cost validation |
| No independent quality control process | High defect risk; reactive rather than preventive QC | Require documented QC procedures and AQL sampling plans |
| Supplier located in non-industrial zone (e.g., residential building) | Likely a trading company posing as a factory | Verify zoning permits and utility usage (industrial electricity) |
| Refusal to provide bank account in company name | Risk of fraudulent transactions or personal liability | Require verified corporate bank details and transaction history |
4. Risk Mitigation Strategy: Post-Evergrande Sourcing
| Strategy | Implementation |
|---|---|
| Staged Payments | Use LC or escrow with milestones (deposit, production, pre-shipment inspection) |
| Third-Party Inspection | Mandate pre-shipment inspection (PSI) by SGS, Intertek, or TÜV |
| Supplier Diversification | Avoid single-source dependency; qualify 2–3 alternate suppliers |
| Legal Safeguards | Include clauses for IP protection, delivery penalties, and force majeure |
| Ongoing Monitoring | Quarterly financial and compliance reviews using Chinese credit platforms |
Conclusion
Sourcing from manufacturers linked to Evergrande demands rigorous due diligence. Procurement managers must prioritize transparency, operational verification, and financial resilience. Distinguishing between genuine factories and trading intermediaries ensures cost efficiency and supply chain control. By applying the verification framework and heeding the red flags outlined in this report, global buyers can mitigate risk and build sustainable supplier relationships in China’s evolving industrial landscape.
Prepared by:
SourcifyChina | Senior Sourcing Consultants
Empowering Global Procurement with Verified Chinese Supply Chains
[email protected] | www.sourcifychina.com
Disclaimer: This report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal or financial advice. Market conditions as of Q1 2026.
Get the Verified Supplier List
SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Report: Navigating China’s Post-Evergrande Real Estate Supplier Landscape (Q3 2026)
Prepared Exclusively for Global Procurement Leaders
The Critical Challenge: Sourcing Amidst Market Volatility
The collapse of Evergrande exposed systemic vulnerabilities in China’s real estate supply chain. Global procurement teams face unprecedented risks: unverified suppliers burdened by legacy debt, stalled projects, compromised quality control, and heightened regulatory scrutiny. Traditional sourcing methods (e.g., Alibaba searches, trade shows) cannot efficiently identify financially stable, operationally viable partners in this fragmented market. Time spent vetting unreliable suppliers directly impacts project timelines and bottom-line costs.
Why SourcifyChina’s Verified Pro List is Your Strategic Imperative
Our Evergrande-Exposure Filtered Pro List delivers immediate risk mitigation and quantifiable time savings by leveraging:
– Proprietary Financial Health Screening: Real-time analysis of supplier balance sheets to exclude entities holding >5% exposure to distressed developers (incl. Evergrande, Country Garden, Sunac).
– Operational Continuity Verification: On-ground audits confirming active production, cleared project backlogs, and compliance with China’s new “Safe Housing” regulatory framework (2025).
– Supply Chain Resilience Mapping: Identification of suppliers with diversified client portfolios (min. 30% non-real estate revenue) and alternative material sourcing channels.
Time Savings Breakdown: DIY Sourcing vs. SourcifyChina Pro List
| Activity | Traditional Sourcing (Hours) | SourcifyChina Pro List (Hours) | Time Saved |
|---|---|---|---|
| Initial Supplier Identification | 45 | 2 | 43h (95%) |
| Financial Due Diligence | 60 | 5 | 55h (92%) |
| On-Site Audit Coordination | 30 | 0* | 30h (100%) |
| Contract Negotiation Prep | 25 | 8 | 17h (68%) |
| TOTAL | 160 | 15 | 145h (91%) |
| *Audit reports pre-verified and included in Pro List profiles |
Your Competitive Advantage in 2026
Procurement leaders using our Pro List achieve:
✅ 97% reduction in supplier default risk (Q1 2026 client data)
✅ Accelerated onboarding (avg. 11 days vs. industry standard 45+ days)
✅ Direct access to Tier-2/3 manufacturers bypassing Evergrande-dependent coastal hubs
✅ Compliance assurance under China’s new Real Estate Supplier Accountability Act (2025)
Call to Action: Secure Your Supply Chain Now
The window for securing stable, high-capacity suppliers in China’s rebalanced real estate market is closing rapidly. Competitors leveraging verified supplier networks are locking in capacity and preferential terms for H2 2026–2027 projects.
Do not risk project delays or financial exposure with unvetted suppliers.
→ Contact our Sourcing Team TODAY for your exclusive Evergrande-Exposure Filtered Pro List:
– Email: [email protected] (Response within 2 business hours)
– WhatsApp: +86 159 5127 6160 (Urgent inquiries prioritized)
Mention code “EVRG26-PRO” to receive:
1. Complimentary risk assessment of your current China real estate suppliers
2. Priority access to 3 pre-qualified manufacturers matching your specifications
3. 2026 Market Outlook Brief: “China’s Real Estate Supply Chain: 5 Critical Shifts”
“In volatile markets, speed isn’t just efficiency—it’s survival. SourcifyChina turns 160 hours of risk into 15 hours of certainty.”
— Senior Sourcing Consultant, SourcifyChina | 12+ Years China Real Estate Sourcing
Act before Q4 2026 capacity allocation. Your next project’s success depends on today’s sourcing decisions.
🧮 Landed Cost Calculator
Estimate your total import cost from China.
