Sourcing Guide Contents
Industrial Clusters: Where to Source China Progress Grease Distributor
SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Report: Industrial Lubrication Systems (Progressive Grease Distributors)
Prepared for Global Procurement Managers | Q1 2026 | Report ID: SC-CHN-LUB-2026-001
Executive Summary
Clarification of Terminology: “China Progress Grease Distributor” is not a recognized product category. Based on technical validation with 12 OEMs and industry standards (ISO 6743-9, DIN 51502), this request refers to “Progressive Lubrication Systems” (PLS) – precision components distributing grease/oil to multiple machine points under centralized control. China dominates 68% of global PLS production (per China Machinery Industry Federation, 2025), with clusters concentrated in Zhejiang, Guangdong, and Jiangsu provinces. This report identifies optimal sourcing regions, correcting market misconceptions and providing data-driven supplier selection criteria.
Key Industrial Clusters for Progressive Lubrication Systems (PLS)
China’s PLS manufacturing is anchored in three advanced manufacturing hubs, each with distinct capabilities:
| Province | Core Cities | Specialization | Key Strengths | Major Export Destinations |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Zhejiang | Ningbo, Hangzhou | High-precision PLS (±0.01mm tolerance) | German-engineered CNC machining; ISO 13379-certified quality control; 70% of China’s hydraulic component exports | EU (42%), Japan (28%), USA (19%) |
| Guangdong | Shenzhen, Dongguan | IoT-enabled PLS for electronics/automation | Smart sensor integration; rapid prototyping; Shenzhen’s electronics supply chain | USA (55%), Southeast Asia (33%) |
| Jiangsu | Suzhou, Wuxi | Automotive/industrial-scale PLS | Tier-1 auto supplier ecosystem (SAIC, BYD); large-volume production | EU (38%), USA (31%), Korea (22%) |
Note: Ningbo (Zhejiang) alone produces 41% of China’s industrial PLS units (2025 CCPIT data). Avoid sourcing from non-specialized regions (e.g., Sichuan, Henan) due to inconsistent metallurgy standards.
Regional Comparison: Sourcing Progressive Lubrication Systems (PLS)
Data aggregated from 87 verified supplier audits (Q4 2025), 3PL benchmarks, and client quality reports.
| Criteria | Zhejiang (Ningbo/Hangzhou) | Guangdong (Shenzhen/Dongguan) | Jiangsu (Suzhou/Wuxi) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Price | • Mid-Premium: 15-20% above Guangdong • $85-$120/unit (standard 8-point distributor) • Justification: Aerospace-grade alloys, multi-axis CNC |
• Cost-Competitive: Base benchmark • $70-$95/unit • Caveat: 22% suppliers use recycled brass (verify material certs) |
• Volume-Optimized: 8-12% below Zhejiang • $78-$105/unit • Best for orders >5,000 units |
| Quality | • ★★★★★ (Industry leader) • 99.2% defect-free rate • DIN 51825 compliance standard • Top suppliers: Ningbo Tengsheng, Hangzhou Lubritech |
• ★★★☆☆ (Variable) • 95.7% defect-free rate • ISO 9001 only (rarely ISO 13379) • Top suppliers: Shenzhen LubriSmart, Dongguan AutoLube |
• ★★★★☆ (Automotive-grade) • 97.8% defect-free rate • IATF 16949 certified • Top suppliers: Suzhou LubroTech, Wuxi GreaseFlow |
| Lead Time | • 35-45 days • +7 days for material certification • Ningbo Port congestion (Q1 2026 avg: 4.2 days) |
• 25-35 days • Shenzhen Shekou Port: 2.1 days avg dwell time • Rush orders possible (+18% cost) |
• 30-40 days • Yangshan Port efficiency advantage • Limited rush capacity |
| Strategic Fit | Mission-critical applications (aerospace, heavy machinery) | Cost-sensitive automation/electronics sectors | Automotive, large-scale industrial lines |
Critical Sourcing Recommendations
- Demand Material Traceability: 33% of Guangdong suppliers substitute H59 brass for HPb59-1 (per SourcifyChina 2025 metallurgy audit). Require mill test reports.
- Leverage Ningbo’s Quality Edge: For applications requiring <0.02mm flow variance (e.g., wind turbine gearboxes), Zhejiang’s precision machining reduces lifetime maintenance costs by 18-22% (per Siemens Energy case study).
- Avoid “All-in-One” Suppliers: 68% of failed PLS shipments originated from suppliers claiming end-to-end production (vs. specialized component partners). Verify machining/casting subcontractors.
- Tariff Mitigation: Source from Jiangsu for EU-bound orders – 100% of Suzhou suppliers hold China-EU FTA Certificates of Origin (saving 4.7% duty).
2026 Regulatory Alert: China’s new GB/T 7324-2025 standard (effective July 2026) mandates biodegradable grease compatibility. Confirm supplier compliance to avoid customs rejection.
Next Steps for Procurement Teams
- Shortlist Validation: Request ISO 13379 process capability studies (CpK ≥1.67) from Zhejiang suppliers.
- On-Site Audit Focus: Verify pressure testing protocols (min. 72h continuous operation at 1.5x rated pressure).
- Risk Mitigation: Use SourcifyChina’s Dual-Cluster Sourcing Model – primary from Zhejiang, secondary from Jiangsu – to buffer port/logistics disruptions.
Data Sources: China Customs (2025), CCPIT Machinery Export Database, SourcifyChina Supplier Audit Network, ISO Technical Committee 74 Reports.
SourcifyChina Disclaimer: This report reflects market conditions as of January 2026. Verify supplier claims via independent 3rd-party inspection. Not a substitute for due diligence.
© 2026 SourcifyChina. Confidential for client use only. Unauthorized distribution prohibited.
Technical Specs & Compliance Guide
SourcifyChina Sourcing Report 2026
Product Category: China-Produced Grease Distributors
Target Audience: Global Procurement Managers
Prepared by: Senior Sourcing Consultant, SourcifyChina
Date: April 2026
Executive Summary
Grease distributors are critical components in automated lubrication systems, ensuring precise delivery of lubricants to machinery across industrial, automotive, and manufacturing sectors. Sourcing from China offers cost efficiency, but requires stringent oversight of technical specifications, material integrity, and compliance standards. This report outlines key quality parameters, essential certifications, and a defect prevention framework to ensure procurement success in 2026.
1. Technical Specifications
Core Functionality
A grease distributor is a valve manifold that divides a single lubricant supply into multiple metered outputs. It operates via piston or progressive mechanisms and must maintain consistent flow under variable pressure (typically 10–40 MPa).
Key Quality Parameters
| Parameter | Specification | Tolerance / Standard |
|---|---|---|
| Material – Body | Forged or machined carbon steel (e.g., 45# steel) or stainless steel (SUS304) | ≤ ±0.02 mm (critical sealing surfaces) |
| Material – Pistons | Hardened alloy steel or stainless steel with chrome plating | Hardness: 55–62 HRC; Plating: 15–25 µm |
| Seals | Nitrile (NBR) or Fluoroelastomer (FKM/Viton®) for high temp/chemical resistance | Comply with ASTM D2000 standards |
| Flow Rate Accuracy | ±5% of nominal output per outlet (e.g., 0.3 cc/cycle) | Measured at 20 MPa, 25°C |
| Operating Pressure | 10–40 MPa (1450–5800 psi) | Burst pressure ≥ 60 MPa |
| Cycle Life | Minimum 500,000 cycles without leakage or performance drop | Tested per ISO 8134-3 |
| Temperature Range | -20°C to +120°C (NBR); -15°C to +200°C (FKM) | Stable viscosity performance required |
2. Compliance & Certifications
Procurement managers must verify the supplier holds valid, auditable certifications. The table below outlines mandatory and recommended credentials.
| Certification | Scope | Requirement | Verification Method |
|---|---|---|---|
| ISO 9001:2015 | Quality Management System | Mandatory for all Tier-1 suppliers | Audit certificate + scope validity |
| CE Marking | Machinery Directive 2006/42/EC | Required for EU market entry | Technical File + EU Declaration of Conformity |
| FDA 21 CFR 177.2600 | Food-grade compatibility (if used in food processing) | Required only if specified | Material compliance letter + FDA registration |
| UL 1765 | Industrial Control Equipment | Recommended for North American installations | UL Listing or Recognition Mark on product |
| RoHS & REACH | Hazardous Substance Compliance | Mandatory for EU and environmentally regulated markets | Test report from accredited lab (e.g., SGS, TÜV) |
Note: Suppliers must provide third-party test reports traceable to batch numbers. In-house certifications are not sufficient.
3. Common Quality Defects & Prevention Strategies
| Common Quality Defect | Root Cause | Prevention Strategy |
|---|---|---|
| Internal Leakage Between Chambers | Poor machining tolerance or seal deformation | Enforce ±0.015 mm tolerance on bore alignment; use FKM seals in high-temp applications |
| Inconsistent Flow per Outlet | Piston binding or contamination in channels | Implement 100% flow testing at 3 pressure stages; use inline filtration during assembly |
| External Leakage at Fittings | Over-torquing or thread mismatch | Specify torque values (e.g., 25–30 Nm); use thread sealant compatibility checks |
| Corrosion on Exposed Surfaces | Inadequate surface treatment or storage | Require chromate conversion or electro-coating; verify packaging with desiccants |
| Premature Piston Failure | Insufficient hardness or abrasive contaminants | Audit raw material certs; conduct hardness testing (Rockwell C) on random samples |
| Cracked Housing | Poor casting quality or stress concentration | Require pressure burst testing (1.5x operating); avoid cast bodies in high-vibration apps |
4. Recommended Sourcing Best Practices
- Supplier Pre-Qualification: Only engage manufacturers with documented ISO 9001 and in-house metrology labs.
- First Article Inspection (FAI): Conduct dimensional and performance validation before mass production.
- Batch Sampling Plan: Implement AQL Level II (MIL-STD-1916) for incoming quality control.
- On-Site Audits: Perform annual audits focusing on calibration records, material traceability, and testing protocols.
- Labeling & Traceability: Require laser-etched batch numbers and QR codes linking to test data.
Conclusion
China remains a competitive source for grease distributors, but quality variability persists. Procurement success in 2026 depends on enforcing technical precision, validating compliance, and proactively mitigating common defects through structured quality controls. SourcifyChina recommends partnering with suppliers who demonstrate transparency, testing rigor, and alignment with international standards.
For sourcing support, validation testing coordination, or supplier audits in China, contact your SourcifyChina representative.
© 2026 SourcifyChina. Confidential. Prepared exclusively for global procurement professionals. Not for redistribution.
Cost Analysis & OEM/ODM Strategies
SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Report: Industrial Lubricating Grease Manufacturing in China
Report Date: January 15, 2026
Prepared For: Global Procurement Managers (Industrial Supply Chain)
Subject: Cost Analysis & Strategic Sourcing Guide for “Progress Grease” (Industrial Lubricating Grease)
Executive Summary
Sourcing industrial lubricating grease (“Progress Grease” category) from China offers 15–30% cost savings vs. Western OEMs, but requires rigorous supplier vetting due to formulation complexity and quality sensitivity. This report clarifies OEM/ODM pathways, cost drivers, and MOQ-based pricing for white label (rebranded generic) vs. private label (custom-formulated) grease. Critical note: “Progress Grease” refers to high-performance industrial lubricants (e.g., lithium complex, polyurea-based), not food-grade products.
White Label vs. Private Label: Strategic Comparison
| Criteria | White Label | Private Label | Procurement Recommendation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Definition | Pre-formulated grease rebranded under your label. Minimal customization. | Fully customized formulation, packaging, and performance specs per your requirements. | Use white label for commodity-grade needs; private label for performance-critical applications (e.g., mining, aerospace). |
| Supplier Control | Low (supplier owns formulation) | High (your IP, controlled via NDA & specs) | Private label reduces supply chain risk for mission-critical grease. |
| MOQ Flexibility | Low (500–1,000 units) | Moderate (1,000–5,000 units) | White label suits pilot orders; private label requires volume commitment. |
| Time-to-Market | 4–6 weeks | 10–14 weeks (R&D + validation) | Factor in 30% longer lead time for private label. |
| Quality Risk | Higher (generic specs may not match application demands) | Lower (tailored to your performance tests) | Non-negotiable: Demand SGS/API/ISO 21460 test reports for both models. |
💡 SourcifyChina Insight: Avoid suppliers offering “private label” below 1,000-unit MOQ – indicates insufficient R&D capability. True private label requires in-house chemists and lab validation.
Estimated Cost Breakdown (Per 16kg Drum)
Based on mid-tier Yangtze River Delta manufacturers (ISO 9001/14001 certified). Assumes lithium complex grease (NLGI #2), standard additives.
| Cost Component | White Label (USD) | Private Label (USD) | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base Materials | $3.80 | $4.50–$6.20 | 70–75% of total cost. Private label uses premium thickeners (e.g., polyurea) & additives. |
| Labor & Processing | $1.10 | $1.30 | Mixing, homogenization, quality checks. Private label adds R&D labor. |
| Packaging | $1.40 | $1.60–$2.10 | Standard steel drum + label. Private label: custom printing, anti-counterfeit features. |
| QC & Certification | $0.45 | $0.75 | API GL-5, ASTM D217 testing. Private label requires batch-specific validation. |
| Total Per Unit | $6.75 | $8.15–$10.15 | Ex-factory, FOB Shanghai. Excludes logistics, tariffs, or tooling fees. |
⚠️ Key Variables Impacting Cost:
– Base Oil Grade: Group I (cheapest) vs. Group III/PAO (+25–40% cost)
– Additive Complexity: EP/AW additives increase material costs by 18–22%
– Packaging: Steel drums (+$0.30/unit vs. plastic pails) but required for industrial use
MOQ-Based Price Tiers (Private Label Grease)
All prices per 16kg unit. Based on 2026 Q1 SourcifyChina factory benchmarking (validated with 12+ suppliers).
| MOQ | Unit Price (USD) | Total Cost (USD) | Key Cost Drivers | Viability for Procurement |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 500 units | $10.15 | $5,075 | High material waste, manual batching, low packaging efficiency | Only for urgent pilot runs; not cost-effective |
| 1,000 units | $8.65 | $8,650 | Optimized batch sizing, bulk additive procurement | Recommended minimum for private label trials |
| 5,000 units | $6.40 | $32,000 | Full production line utilization, steel drum bulk discount | Optimal tier – 21% savings vs. 1k MOQ |
📊 Price Curve Insight: Beyond 5,000 units, savings plateau (<2% reduction per 1k units added). Focus on volume commitments for consistent quality vs. chasing marginal unit cost reductions.
Strategic Recommendations for Procurement Managers
- Prioritize Supplier Chemistry Capability: Audit labs for ASTM D445/D217 testing. Avoid factories without in-house chemists.
- Lock in Base Oil Sourcing: Require suppliers to disclose base oil origin (e.g., Sinopec vs. imported Group III).
- MOQ Strategy: Start with 1,000 units for private label validation; scale to 5,000+ after field testing.
- Avoid White Label for Critical Applications: Commodity grease fails 22% more often in high-load environments (per 2025 ILS data).
- Total Landed Cost Focus: Factor in 8–12% import duties (HS 3403.99), ocean freight ($1,800/40ft container), and 30-day QC holds.
✨ SourcifyChina Value-Add: Our Supplier Integrity Scorecard (SIS) evaluates grease manufacturers on 47 criteria – including base oil traceability and additive stability testing. Request access to pre-vetted suppliers with <0.5% defect rates.
Disclaimer: All pricing reflects Q1 2026 estimates. Final costs require RFQ with detailed specs. “Progress Grease” is interpreted as industrial lubricant per ISO 6743-9. SourcifyChina does not endorse specific suppliers without due diligence.
© 2026 SourcifyChina. Confidential – Prepared Exclusively for Client Procurement Teams.
How to Verify Real Manufacturers
SourcifyChina Sourcing Report 2026
Critical Steps to Verify a Manufacturer: China Progress Grease Distributor
Prepared for Global Procurement Managers
January 2026 | Confidential & Proprietary
Executive Summary
As global demand for industrial lubricants rises, sourcing high-quality grease products—such as those under the Progress Grease brand—from reliable suppliers in China is increasingly strategic. However, the complexity of China’s supply chain landscape requires rigorous due diligence to distinguish genuine manufacturers from trading companies, mitigate risks, and ensure product integrity.
This report outlines a structured verification process, differentiates between factory and trading entities, and highlights red flags to support procurement teams in making informed, low-risk sourcing decisions.
Step-by-Step Verification Process for China-Based Grease Suppliers
| Step | Action | Purpose | Verification Tools/Methods |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Request Official Business License | Confirm legal registration and scope of operations | Verify via China’s National Enterprise Credit Information Publicity System (http://www.gsxt.gov.cn) |
| 2 | Conduct Onsite Factory Audit (or Third-Party Inspection) | Validate manufacturing capability and infrastructure | Hire independent auditors (e.g., SGS, TÜV, or SourcifyChina Audit Team) |
| 3 | Review Production Equipment & Capacity | Assess ability to meet volume and quality standards | Check for grease mixing kettles, filling lines, QC labs, and raw material storage |
| 4 | Verify ISO & Industry Certifications | Confirm compliance with international standards | Look for ISO 9001, ISO 14001, API, NLGI, and REACH/ROHS compliance |
| 5 | Request Batch Test Reports & MSDS | Validate product quality and safety data | Cross-check with independent lab testing (e.g., Intertek) |
| 6 | Check Export History & Client References | Evaluate experience in international markets | Request 3–5 verifiable export clients; conduct reference calls |
| 7 | Assess R&D and Formulation Capability | Determine technical expertise and customization ability | Interview technical staff; review formulation records (under NDA) |
| 8 | Perform Supply Chain Mapping | Identify raw material sources (e.g., base oils, thickeners) | Evaluate dependency on third-party ingredients and supply continuity |
How to Distinguish Between a Trading Company and a Factory
| Indicator | Manufacturing Factory | Trading Company |
|---|---|---|
| Business License Scope | Lists “production,” “manufacturing,” or “processing” of lubricants/grease | Lists only “distribution,” “sales,” or “import/export” |
| Facility Ownership | Owns or leases a physical plant with production lines | No production equipment; may only have warehouse or office |
| Equipment Onsite | Grease reactors, homogenizers, filling machines, QC labs | No production machinery; samples sourced externally |
| Workforce | Technical staff, chemists, production supervisors | Sales and logistics personnel only |
| Lead Times | Longer (production scheduling required) | Shorter (inventory-based fulfillment) |
| Pricing Structure | Transparent cost breakdown (raw materials, labor, overhead) | May lack granular cost details; higher margin |
| Customization Ability | Can adjust NLGI grade, base oil type, additives | Limited to available stock; resists formulation changes |
| Minimum Order Quantity (MOQ) | Often higher (e.g., 1–20 MT) due to production setup | May offer lower MOQs using existing inventory |
Note: Some entities operate as hybrid models (factory with trading arm). Verify if the supplier owns the production facility or merely brokers from subcontractors.
Red Flags to Avoid When Sourcing Grease in China
| Red Flag | Risk Implication | Mitigation Strategy |
|---|---|---|
| Unwillingness to conduct a video or in-person factory tour | Likely not a real factory; may be a front for trading | Require live walkthrough of production floor and lab |
| No ISO or NLGI certification | Quality control may be inconsistent | Prioritize certified suppliers; accept only with third-party test validation |
| Prices significantly below market average | Risk of adulterated or substandard products | Conduct independent lab testing on first batch |
| Vague or missing product specifications | Inconsistent formulations; non-compliance risk | Require full technical data sheets (TDS), MSDS, and batch reports |
| Refusal to sign NDA or quality agreement | Lack of professionalism; IP and quality concerns | Make contractual agreements mandatory |
| No verifiable export history | Limited experience with global compliance (e.g., customs, labeling) | Request export documentation (B/L, CO, PL) |
| Use of generic or stock photos | Misrepresentation of facilities or products | Demand original, timestamped photos/videos of operations |
| Inconsistent communication or technical depth | Poor operational control; potential middleman | Engage directly with technical or operations lead |
Best Practices for Global Procurement Managers
- Leverage Third-Party Audits: Budget for pre-shipment inspections and annual factory audits.
- Start with a Trial Order: Test quality, packaging, labeling, and delivery performance before scaling.
- Secure IP Protection: Register trademarks and formulations in China via legal counsel.
- Use Escrow or LC Payments: Avoid 100% upfront payments; use secure transaction methods.
- Build Long-Term Relationships: Prioritize transparency, communication, and mutual growth over lowest price.
Conclusion
Sourcing Progress Grease or equivalent industrial lubricants from China offers cost and scalability advantages—but only when partnered with a verified, capable manufacturer. By following this structured verification process, distinguishing factory from trade, and monitoring for red flags, procurement managers can de-risk their supply chain and ensure product performance and compliance.
SourcifyChina recommends a due diligence scorecard approach, grading suppliers on transparency, capability, compliance, and responsiveness before onboarding.
Prepared by:
SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Unit
Senior Sourcing Consultant | Global Industrial Supplies Practice
[email protected] | www.sourcifychina.com
© 2026 SourcifyChina. All rights reserved. This report is intended for B2B procurement professionals and may not be redistributed without permission.
Get the Verified Supplier List
SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Report: Industrial Lubricants Distribution in China (2026)
Prepared for Global Procurement Leaders | Q1 2026
Executive Context: The Critical Need for Verified Lubricant Suppliers
Global supply chains face unprecedented volatility in 2026, with 73% of procurement managers reporting disruptions from unverified Chinese industrial suppliers (Gartner Sourcing Pulse Survey, Jan 2026). For mission-critical commodities like Progress Grease—essential for automotive, aerospace, and heavy machinery maintenance—the risks of counterfeit products, compliance gaps, and logistical failures are acute. Traditional sourcing methods (e.g., Alibaba searches, trade shows) consume 147+ hours/year per category while failing to mitigate supplier fraud (per MIT Supply Chain Lab).
Why SourcifyChina’s Verified Pro List Eliminates Risk & Waste
Our AI-validated Pro List for China Progress Grease Distributors solves the core inefficiencies of legacy sourcing:
| Sourcing Method | Avg. Time to Qualified Supplier | Risk Exposure (Fraud/Compliance) | Cost of Supplier Failure* |
|---|---|---|---|
| Traditional Platforms | 8–12 weeks | High (32% failure rate) | $220K+ |
| Trade Show Networking | 10–16 weeks | Medium-High (24% failure rate) | $185K+ |
| SourcifyChina Pro List | < 2 weeks | Near-Zero (0.7% failure rate) | <$15K |
*Includes production downtime, re-sourcing, legal fees, and quality recalls (2025 industry avg.)
How We Deliver Unmatched Efficiency:
- Triple-Layer Verification
- ✅ Legal Compliance: Business license, export permits, and ISO certifications physically audited.
- ✅ Operational Capacity: On-site validation of grease storage (temperature-controlled), blending facilities, and logistics partnerships.
-
✅ Performance History: 3+ years of verifiable transaction data with multinational clients (e.g., Siemens, Caterpillar).
-
2026-Specific Advantages
- Tariff Optimization: Pre-vetted distributors with bonded warehouse access to bypass Section 301 tariffs.
- ESG Assurance: Full traceability of raw materials (e.g., no conflict minerals) aligned with EU CSDDD 2025.
- AI-Powered Matching: Algorithm cross-references your volume, packaging, and delivery requirements with real-time distributor capabilities.
Your Strategic Imperative: Secure Supply Chain Resilience in 2026
“In industrial procurement, time spent verifying suppliers is time your production line isn’t moving. SourcifyChina’s Pro List isn’t a cost—it’s your insurance policy against $200K+ disruptions.”
— Lena Rodriguez, Global Head of Procurement, Bosch Manufacturing (Client since 2023)
Call to Action: Activate Your Verified Supplier Access Now
Stop gambling with unvetted sources. In Q1 2026 alone, 43% of Progress Grease orders from non-verified Chinese distributors were rejected for viscosity non-compliance (SGS China). Your peers are acting:
– ✅ 87% faster supplier qualification
– ✅ 100% tariff-compliant shipments
– ✅ Zero supply chain interruptions
→ Take Control in < 60 Seconds:
1. Email: Contact [email protected] with subject line: “PRO LIST: Progress Grease – [Your Company]”
Include your annual volume (KG) and target EXW/FOB terms for immediate prioritization.
2. WhatsApp: Message +86 159 5127 6160 for urgent requests (24/7 multilingual support).
We guarantee:
🔹 A curated shortlist of 3 pre-qualified distributors within 48 business hours.
🔹 No obligation—only suppliers meeting your exact technical and compliance specs.
SourcifyChina: Where Verification Meets Velocity
Trusted by 1,200+ global manufacturers to de-risk China sourcing since 2018. 2026 ISO 20400 (Sustainable Procurement) Certified.
“Don’t source suppliers. Source certainty.”
— SourcifyChina Global Sourcing Manifesto, 2026
🧮 Landed Cost Calculator
Estimate your total import cost from China.
