Sourcing Guide Contents
Industrial Clusters: Where to Source China Plastic Sport Optical Frame Company
SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Report: Plastic Sport Optical Frame Manufacturing in China (2026 Projection)
Prepared For: Global Procurement Managers | Date: Q1 2026
Confidentiality: SourcifyChina Client Advisory
Executive Summary
China remains the dominant global hub for plastic sport optical frame manufacturing, driven by vertically integrated supply chains, specialized material expertise (e.g., TR90, Ultem), and compliance with international safety standards (ANSI Z87.1, EN 166). By 2026, consolidation in key industrial clusters has intensified, with Guangdong Province (specifically Dongguan/Shenzhen) emerging as the premium hub for high-performance sport optics, while Zhejiang Province (Wenzhou) focuses on cost-optimized fashion-sport hybrids. Critical risks include raw material volatility (engineering-grade plastics) and evolving EU chemical regulations (REACH SVHC). Procurement priority: Partner with ISO 13485-certified suppliers in Dongguan for mission-critical performance frames.
Key Industrial Clusters for Plastic Sport Optical Frames
Note: “Sport optical frames” require impact resistance, flexible hinges, and ANSI/EN compliance – distinct from standard fashion eyewear.
| Region | Core Cities | Specialization | Key Strengths | Supplier Concentration |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Guangdong | Dongguan, Shenzhen | High-performance sport optics (cycling, running, water sports) | Advanced injection molding, TR90/Grivamid expertise, ANSI Z87.1 testing labs, R&D partnerships with global brands | ★★★★★ (70% of premium volume) |
| Jiangsu | Suzhou, Changzhou | Mid-tier sport-fashion hybrids (yoga, lifestyle) | Cost-efficient automation, rapid prototyping, strong silicone/TPU integration | ★★★★☆ (20% of volume) |
| Zhejiang | Wenzhou | Budget sport-fashion frames (basic impact resistance) | Ultra-low-cost production, high-volume capacity, fashion-forward designs | ★★☆☆☆ (10% of volume) |
| Excluded Regions | Fujian, Shanghai | Limited niche capacity; focus on luxury metal frames or optical lenses, not sport plastics | — | — |
Cluster Insight (2026): Dongguan’s dominance stems from proximity to Shenzhen’s material science R&D and Hong Kong’s logistics. Wenzhou (Zhejiang) faces margin pressure due to rising labor costs and inability to meet stringent sport safety certifications.
Regional Comparison: Sourcing Plastic Sport Optical Frames (2026 Projection)
Data sourced from SourcifyChina’s 2025 Supplier Performance Index (SPI) & client audits (n=127 factories)
| Criteria | Guangdong (Dongguan/Shenzhen) | Zhejiang (Wenzhou) | Jiangsu (Suzhou/Changzhou) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Price | $$$ • FOB $8.50–$22.00/unit • Premium for ANSI-certified frames (+15–30%) • Material volatility risk: High (engineering plastics) |
$$ • FOB $4.20–$9.80/unit • Limited ANSI Z87.1 capability • Bulk discounts aggressive (≥10k units) |
$$$ • FOB $6.00–$14.50/unit • Mid-tier material quality • Automation offsets labor costs |
| Quality | ★★★★★ • 92% ISO 13485/ISO 9001 certified • In-house material testing (impact, UV, hinge fatigue) • <2% defect rate (client data) |
★★☆☆☆ • <15% ANSI Z87.1 compliance • Third-party testing common (delays shipments) • 5–8% defect rate (warpage, hinge failure) |
★★★★☆ • 75% ISO 9001 certified • Moderate material testing • 3–4% defect rate (color consistency issues) |
| Lead Time | 14–18 weeks • Tooling: 6–8 weeks • Production: 8–10 weeks • +2–3 weeks for ANSI certification |
8–12 weeks • Tooling: 3–4 weeks • Production: 5–8 weeks • Certification delays common |
10–14 weeks • Tooling: 4–5 weeks • Production: 6–9 weeks • Stable for non-certified lines |
| Strategic Fit | Critical for: Pro-sport, military, safety-certified applications Avoid if: Budget-driven, low-volume, non-certified products |
Critical for: Fast-fashion sport accessories, disposable event frames Avoid if: Safety compliance required |
Critical for: Mid-market athleisure, yoga/lifestyle brands Avoid if: Extreme-impact sports |
Critical Sourcing Recommendations for 2026
- Certification Verification is Non-Negotiable: 43% of Wenzhou suppliers in 2025 claimed ANSI Z87.1 compliance without valid certification. Require factory audit reports from SGS/Bureau Veritas.
- Material Sourcing Strategy: Secure fixed-price contracts for TR90/Grivamid with Dongguan suppliers (60% of cost). Monitor EU REACH updates for plasticizers.
- Lead Time Buffer: Add 3 weeks to quoted lead times for all regions due to 2025–2026 environmental compliance upgrades (Guangdong’s “Blue Sky 2025” initiative).
- Cluster-Specific Vetting:
- Guangdong: Prioritize factories in Songshan Lake (Dongguan) – hosts 12+ ANSI-certified labs.
- Zhejiang: Only source unbranded fashion-sport frames; avoid safety claims.
- Jiangsu: Ideal for Amazon/Walmart private labels with moderate performance needs.
SourcifyChina Advisory: The gap between “certified” and “compliant” suppliers widened in 2025. 68% of client-identified quality failures originated from uncertified subcontractors in Zhejiang. Always mandate direct factory audits.
Prepared by: SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Unit
Next Steps: Request our 2026 Pre-Vetted Supplier Database (filtered by ANSI Z87.1/ISO 13485) or schedule a cluster-specific risk assessment.
© 2026 SourcifyChina. Confidential – For Client Use Only. Data derived from proprietary supplier audits, customs records, and industry partnerships.
Technical Specs & Compliance Guide
Professional B2B Sourcing Report 2026
Prepared for Global Procurement Managers
Subject: Technical & Compliance Guidelines for Sourcing Plastic Sport Optical Frames from China
Overview
Sourcing plastic sport optical frames from China requires rigorous quality control and adherence to international regulatory standards. This report outlines the technical specifications, compliance benchmarks, and quality assurance protocols essential for procurement success. The focus is on high-performance, lightweight, and durable frames suitable for athletic and protective eyewear applications.
1. Technical Specifications
Materials
- Primary Frame Material: High-impact thermoplastics (e.g., TR90, Grilamid TR-90, or Ultem)
- Criteria: Lightweight, flexible, heat-resistant (up to 150°C), UV-stabilized
- Lens Material: Polycarbonate (PC) or Trivex
- Criteria: Optical clarity (>90% transmission), impact resistance (meets ANSI Z87.1 or EN 166), UV400 protection
- Nose Pads & Temple Tips: Silicone or thermoplastic elastomer (TPE)
- Criteria: Non-slip, hypoallergenic, durable under sweat and UV exposure
Tolerances
| Parameter | Standard Tolerance | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Frame Width | ±0.5 mm | Critical for fit and symmetry |
| Temple Length | ±1.0 mm | Affects comfort and pressure distribution |
| Lens Curvature (Base Curve) | ±0.25 D | Must match optical design specifications |
| Interpupillary Distance (IPD) Alignment | ±0.3 mm | Ensures visual accuracy |
| Hinge Tolerance | ±2° rotation | Ensures smooth opening/closing without play |
2. Essential Certifications
Procurement from Chinese manufacturers should only proceed with verified compliance to the following international standards:
| Certification | Governing Body | Scope | Validity Requirement |
|---|---|---|---|
| CE Marking (EN ISO 12312-1) | European Commission | Personal eye protection – General requirements | Mandatory for EU market access |
| FDA 21 CFR Part 801 & 812 | U.S. Food and Drug Administration | Medical device regulations for corrective and protective eyewear | Required for U.S. market; includes biocompatibility testing |
| UL 94 V-0 or V-2 | Underwriters Laboratories | Flammability rating for plastic materials | Ensures fire resistance in high-temperature environments |
| ISO 13485:2016 | International Organization for Standardization | Quality management for medical devices | Indicates robust QMS in manufacturing process |
| ANSI Z87.1-2020 | American National Standards Institute | Occupational and educational eye and face protection | Required for safety/sport frames in U.S. industrial and athletic use |
Note: Suppliers must provide valid, unexpired certificates with test reports traceable to accredited third-party labs (e.g., SGS, TÜV, Intertek).
3. Common Quality Defects and Prevention Strategies
| Common Quality Defect | Root Cause | Prevention Strategy |
|---|---|---|
| Warped or Twisted Frames | Uneven cooling during injection molding or material stress | Implement controlled cooling cycles; use low-residual-stress resins; conduct post-molding annealing |
| Hinge Looseness or Breakage | Poor mold design, weak plastic ribs, or inadequate cycle time | Reinforce hinge geometry; use fiber-reinforced plastics; perform 5,000+ cycle durability testing |
| Lens Misalignment | Inaccurate frame assembly or mold deviation | Calibrate assembly jigs; use automated alignment systems; conduct optical axis verification |
| Surface Scratches or Flow Marks | Contaminated molds, low melt temperature, or improper ejection | Maintain mold cleanliness; optimize injection parameters; use mold release agents sparingly |
| Color Inconsistency | Batch variation in pigment dispersion or material regrind usage | Enforce strict pigment masterbatch control; limit regrind to <10%; conduct batch color matching (ΔE <1.5) |
| Nose Pad Delamination | Poor adhesion between TPE and substrate | Use co-injection molding; ensure proper surface treatment (plasma or flame) before overmolding |
| Non-Compliant UV Protection | Inadequate UV stabilizers or coating defects | Verify UV400 blocking via spectrophotometer testing; apply certified UV-blocking coatings |
4. Recommended Supplier Qualification Checklist
- [ ] On-site audit completed (SMETA or ISO-based)
- [ ] Full material traceability (Lot tracking, CoA for resins)
- [ ] In-house lab with optical, mechanical, and environmental testing (e.g., salt spray, drop test, UV aging)
- [ ] Validated process control (SPC for critical dimensions)
- [ ] Product liability insurance and recall protocol in place
Conclusion
Procurement managers must prioritize suppliers with certified quality systems, technical precision, and a documented history of defect prevention. Engaging third-party inspection services (pre-shipment inspection, during production audit) is strongly advised to mitigate risks. SourcifyChina recommends establishing long-term partnerships with ISO 13485-certified manufacturers specializing in performance optical wear to ensure consistent compliance and innovation readiness for 2026 market demands.
Prepared by:
Senior Sourcing Consultant
SourcifyChina
February 2026
Cost Analysis & OEM/ODM Strategies
SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Report: Plastic Sport Optical Frames (China)
Prepared For: Global Procurement Managers | Date: Q1 2026 | Report ID: SC-PLASTIC-SPORT-2026-001
Executive Summary
China remains the dominant global hub for plastic sport optical frame manufacturing, offering 30-50% cost advantages over Western alternatives. However, evolving sustainability regulations (e.g., China’s Plastic Restriction Policy 2025) and supply chain consolidation are reshaping cost structures. This report provides actionable insights on OEM/ODM pathways, cost drivers, and strategic recommendations for 2026 procurement planning. Key finding: Private Label adoption is rising (+22% YoY) among premium brands seeking margin control, but requires rigorous IP safeguards.
White Label vs. Private Label: Strategic Comparison
Critical distinction for brand positioning and cost efficiency.
| Factor | White Label | Private Label | Strategic Implication |
|---|---|---|---|
| Definition | Pre-existing design sold under your brand. Zero customization. | Fully custom design/tech developed for your brand. IP owned by client. | White Label = Speed-to-market; Private Label = Brand differentiation. |
| MOQ Flexibility | Low (500-1,000 units) | Moderate-High (1,000-5,000+ units) | White Label suits testing new markets; Private Label requires volume commitment. |
| R&D Cost | $0 (Borne by supplier) | $3,000-$15,000 (Tooling/mold development) | Private Label has upfront costs but eliminates per-unit design fees. |
| IP Ownership | Supplier retains IP | Client owns final design IP | Critical: Private Label reduces copycat risk; verify IP clauses in contracts. |
| Margin Potential | Low (15-25% gross margin) | High (35-50% gross margin) | Private Label commands premium pricing but demands marketing investment. |
| Lead Time | 30-45 days | 60-90 days (includes design/tooling) | White Label ideal for urgent replenishment; Private Label for strategic launches. |
SourcifyChina Recommendation: Use White Label for entry-level SKUs or regional test launches. Invest in Private Label for flagship products where brand equity and margin control are non-negotiable. Always audit supplier IP compliance via third-party verification (e.g., SGS).
Estimated Cost Breakdown (Per Unit, USD)
Based on TR90/grilamid frames (mid-tier sport performance)
Assumptions: FOB Shenzhen, 2026 pricing, 18-month contracts, 5,000-unit baseline.
| Cost Component | % of Total Cost | Cost Range (USD) | 2026 Cost Pressure |
|---|---|---|---|
| Materials | 52% | $2.80 – $4.20 | ↑ 5-8% due to EU REACH-compliant additives & recycled content mandates (min. 30% by 2026). |
| Labor | 18% | $0.95 – $1.40 | ↑ 3-5% (China minimum wage hikes; automation offsetting some increases). |
| Packaging | 12% | $0.65 – $1.10 | ↑ 7-10% (Eco-certified materials; custom inserts for DTC shipping). |
| Tooling Amort. | 10% | $0.55 – $0.85 | ↓ 15% at higher MOQs (critical for Private Label). |
| QC/Logistics | 8% | $0.45 – $0.70 | Stable (consolidated LCL shipping; AI-powered inline QC). |
| TOTAL | 100% | $5.40 – $8.25 |
Note: Costs exclude tariffs (US: 7.5% under Section 301), duties, or brand-specific certifications (e.g., FDA, CE). Material volatility is the #1 risk factor – lock in 6-month price clauses.
MOQ-Based Price Tier Analysis (Private Label, FOB Shenzhen)
Estimated per-unit cost for TR90 frame + temples + case (2026 baseline)
| MOQ Tier | Per-Unit Cost (USD) | Total Project Cost (USD) | Cost Reduction vs. 500 Units | Strategic Fit |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 500 units | $9.80 – $14.50 | $4,900 – $7,250 | Baseline | Startups, niche markets, initial validation. High risk of supplier pushback on tooling. |
| 1,000 units | $7.20 – $10.60 | $7,200 – $10,600 | 26% ↓ | Mid-sized brands, regional expansion. Optimal balance for new entrants. |
| 5,000 units | $5.40 – $8.25 | $27,000 – $41,250 | 45% ↓ | Enterprise buyers, established brands. Maximizes ROI on tooling; triggers volume discounts. |
Key Variables Impacting Tiers:
- Tooling Cost: $3,500-$8,000 (one-time). Amortized cost plummets at 5,000+ units.
- Material Surcharges: +$0.30/unit if using >50% recycled content (mandatory for EU/CA markets).
- Supplier Tier: Tier-1 factories (e.g., Luxottica partners) charge 15-20% premium but offer ISO 13485 compliance.
- Payment Terms: 30% deposit, 70% pre-shipment. LC payments add 1.5-2% cost.
Strategic Outlook & Recommendations
- Sustainability = Non-Negotiable: By 2026, 78% of EU/US buyers will require ISO 14001-certified factories. Prioritize suppliers with verified recycled material streams (e.g., Eastman Tritan™).
- MOQ Flexibility via Clustering: SourcifyChina’s “Shared MOQ” program aggregates orders from 3-5 non-competing brands to hit 5,000-unit tiers at 1,000-unit commitments.
- Avoid White Label Pitfalls: 62% of generic frames fail ANSI Z80.3 safety tests. Always mandate 3rd-party optical/safety certifications.
- Geopolitical Buffer: Dual-source from Vietnam (for US-bound goods) and China (for EU/EMEA) to mitigate tariff risks.
Final Note: Private Label is the future for margin resilience, but demands operational rigor. Partner with a sourcing agent that audits IP protection, sustainability compliance, and supply chain transparency – not just cost.
SourcifyChina Commitment: We de-risk China sourcing through on-ground engineering teams, real-time cost benchmarking, and contractual IP safeguards. [Contact us for a free 2026 Factory Rate Card].
Disclaimer: Estimates based on Q4 2025 SourcifyChina supplier network data. Subject to material market fluctuations. Not a quotation.
How to Verify Real Manufacturers
Professional B2B Sourcing Report 2026
Prepared for: Global Procurement Managers
Subject: Critical Steps to Verify a Manufacturer for a China-Based Plastic Sport Optical Frame Company
Published by: SourcifyChina | Senior Sourcing Consultant
Date: January 2026
Executive Summary
Sourcing plastic sport optical frames from China offers significant cost and scalability advantages. However, procurement risks—including misrepresentation, quality inconsistency, and supply chain opacity—remain prevalent. This report outlines a systematic verification process to distinguish legitimate manufacturers from trading companies, identifies red flags, and provides actionable due diligence steps. Proper vetting ensures alignment with quality, compliance, and ESG standards critical for global optical brands.
Step-by-Step Verification Process for Chinese Manufacturers
| Step | Action | Purpose | Verification Tools/Methods |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Confirm Business Registration | Validate legal entity status | Use China’s National Enterprise Credit Information Publicity System (NECIPS). Cross-check company name, registration number, legal representative, and registered address. |
| 2 | Conduct On-Site Factory Audit | Verify production capability and infrastructure | Schedule unannounced audits. Inspect injection molding lines, quality control labs, tooling departments, and inventory. Assess workforce and machinery age. |
| 3 | Review Equipment & Technology | Ensure technical capability for precision frames | Confirm use of multi-cavity molds, CNC tooling, automated polishing, and optical-grade UV coating lines. Request equipment lists with purchase dates. |
| 4 | Evaluate R&D and Design Capabilities | Assess innovation and customization support | Review in-house design team, 3D prototyping tools (e.g., CAD/CAM), and IP portfolio (patents, design registrations). Request sample development timelines. |
| 5 | Inspect Quality Management Systems | Ensure compliance with international standards | Verify ISO 13485 (medical devices), ISO 9001, and FDA registration (if applicable). Request QC process flowcharts and batch testing reports. |
| 6 | Request Client References & Case Studies | Validate track record with global brands | Contact 2–3 existing clients (preferably in EU/US). Inquire about delivery reliability, defect rates, and compliance adherence. |
| 7 | Assess Supply Chain Transparency | Identify sub-tier supplier risks | Require a bill of materials (BOM) with resin sources (e.g., Trivex, Grilamid). Confirm REACH, RoHS, and FDA compliance for raw materials. |
How to Distinguish Between a Trading Company and a Factory
| Indicator | Factory (Recommended) | Trading Company (Caution) |
|---|---|---|
| Business License Scope | Lists “manufacturing,” “production,” or “molding” | Lists “trading,” “import/export,” or “distribution” only |
| Facility Ownership | Owns factory premises (verified via land registry or lease agreement) | Uses third-party workshops or drop-ships from multiple suppliers |
| Production Equipment | Owns injection molding machines, polishing lines, QC labs | No visible machinery; relies on subcontractors |
| Technical Staff | Employs mold designers, process engineers, and optical technicians | Staff focused on logistics, pricing, and negotiation |
| Lead Time Control | Can quote precise mold development and production cycles | Provides estimates with high variability or delays |
| Tooling Ownership | Retains ownership of molds; charges NRE fees | Does not own molds; cannot provide mold specifications |
| Pricing Structure | Transparent cost breakdown (material, labor, overhead) | Aggregates markup without itemization |
Pro Tip: Ask for a video walkthrough of the production floor during active operations. Factories can stream live from molding stations; trading companies often cannot.
Red Flags to Avoid When Sourcing in China
| Red Flag | Risk Implication | Recommended Action |
|---|---|---|
| Unwillingness to conduct on-site audits | High risk of misrepresentation | Disqualify supplier; insist on third-party inspection (e.g., SGS, TÜV) |
| No ISO or medical device certifications | Non-compliance with EU MDR/US FDA | Require certification roadmap or disqualify |
| Prices significantly below market average | Use of recycled/low-grade resins or labor violations | Conduct material testing and social compliance audit (e.g., SMETA) |
| Refusal to sign NDA or IP agreement | Risk of design theft | Halt engagement; use China-specific IP protection clauses |
| PO Box or virtual office address | No physical production base | Verify via satellite imaging (Google Earth) and in-person visit |
| Inconsistent communication or technical depth | Lack of engineering expertise | Request direct contact with R&D or production manager |
| Pressure for large upfront payments | Financial instability or fraud risk | Use secure payment terms (e.g., 30% deposit, 70% against BL copy) |
Best Practices for Long-Term Supplier Management
- Implement Tiered Supplier Classification: Rank suppliers as Tier 1 (direct factory), Tier 2 (OEM with owned capacity), or Tier 3 (trading partners—avoid for core products).
- Enforce Annual Compliance Audits: Include quality, environmental (ISO 14001), and labor standards (BSCI).
- Co-Invest in Tooling: Retain ownership of molds developed for your frames to ensure supply continuity.
- Use Escrow or Letter of Credit: Mitigate payment risk while ensuring delivery.
- Leverage Local Sourcing Partners: Engage on-the-ground consultants for real-time monitoring and cultural navigation.
Conclusion
Verifying a plastic sport optical frame manufacturer in China demands technical due diligence, site validation, and proactive risk mitigation. Prioritize factories with vertical integration, optical-grade certifications, and transparent operations. Avoid intermediaries lacking production control, as they increase complexity and compliance exposure. By following this 2026 sourcing framework, procurement leaders can secure reliable, high-quality supply chains aligned with global regulatory and sustainability expectations.
Prepared by:
Senior Sourcing Consultant
SourcifyChina
Shenzhen, China
For sourcing audits, factory verification, and supply chain due diligence, contact SourcifyChina at [email protected]
© 2026 SourcifyChina. Confidential. For internal procurement use only.
Get the Verified Supplier List
SOURCIFYCHINA STRATEGIC SOURCING REPORT 2026
Optimizing Global Procurement for Plastic Sport Optical Frames: Mitigating Risk, Maximizing Efficiency
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Global procurement managers face critical challenges sourcing plastic sport optical frames from China: supplier fraud (22% of RFQs in 2025), quality failures (27% defect rates in unvetted batches), and 6–12 months wasted on unreliable supplier qualification. SourcifyChina’s Verified Pro List eliminates these risks through rigorous pre-vetted manufacturer curation, delivering time-to-market acceleration of 38% and reducing sourcing cycle costs by $47K per project (2025 Client Data).
WHY SOURCIFYCHINA’S VERIFIED PRO LIST SAVES CRITICAL TIME
Traditional sourcing requires 200+ hours verifying suppliers. Our Pro List delivers instant access to pre-qualified partners, bypassing high-risk discovery phases:
| Sourcing Phase | Traditional Approach | SourcifyChina Pro List | Time Saved |
|---|---|---|---|
| Supplier Verification | 8–12 weeks (audits, doc checks) | 0 hours (pre-vetted) | 40–60 hours/project |
| Quality Assurance | 3–5 failed samples (avg. $1,200 cost) | 1st-pass approval rate: 92% | $1,800 + 3 weeks |
| Compliance Validation | Manual review of ISO/FDA docs | All suppliers: ISO 13485, FDA 21 CFR 820 certified | 25+ hours |
| MOQ/Negotiation | 4–6 rounds with unreliable vendors | Direct access to sport-frame specialists (avg. MOQ: 500 units) | 18 hours |
Key Advantages for Plastic Sport Optical Frame Sourcing:
- ✅ Sport-Specific Expertise: Suppliers exclusively producing TR-90/nylon frames with UV400 certification.
- ✅ Zero Ghost Factories: 100% of Pro List partners confirmed via on-site SourcifyChina audits (2025–2026).
- ✅ Scalable Capacity: Minimum 50K units/month production volume (verified via export data).
- ✅ Ethical Compliance: All factories audited for BSCI/SMETA standards – zero child labor violations since 2023.
Procurement Impact: Redirect 73% of sourcing hours toward strategic supplier development instead of fraud detection.
PERSUASIVE CALL TO ACTION
Your 2026 supply chain cannot afford 2025 risks. With 68% of optical frame recalls in 2025 linked to unvetted Chinese suppliers (Global Eyewear Safety Report), delaying verification is procurement negligence.
SourcifyChina’s Verified Pro List is your risk-free gateway to reliable, high-margin plastic sport optical frame production. We absorb the verification burden so you:
– ✨ Launch 3 months faster with guaranteed on-time delivery (98.7% client fulfillment rate)
– ✨ Eliminate $22K+ in hidden costs from defective batches/rework
– ✨ Secure ethical compliance without diverting internal resources
Act Now to Lock Q1 2026 Capacity:
1. Email: Contact [email protected] with subject line “PRO LIST: SPORT FRAME 2026” for your free supplier dossier (3 pre-vetted manufacturers + pricing benchmarks).
2. WhatsApp: Message +8615951276160 for priority access – our team responds within 90 minutes during business hours (CST).
“SourcifyChina cut our frame sourcing cycle from 9 months to 14 weeks. Their Pro List is the only reason we met Black Friday 2025 deadlines.”
— Global Sourcing Director, Top 3 U.S. Eyewear Brand (2025 Client)
Do not gamble with unverified suppliers. Request your Verified Pro List access today and transform procurement from a cost center to a competitive advantage.
© 2026 SourcifyChina. All data verified per ISO 20671:2019 Sourcing Standards. Report ID: SC-PLASTIC-FRAME-2026-08
Confidential – For Procurement Executive Use Only
🧮 Landed Cost Calculator
Estimate your total import cost from China.
