Sourcing Guide Contents
Industrial Clusters: Where to Source China Plastic Mould Company
SourcifyChina | Professional B2B Sourcing Report 2026
Title: Deep-Dive Market Analysis: Sourcing Plastic Mold Companies in China
Prepared For: Global Procurement Managers
Date: April 5, 2026
Author: Senior Sourcing Consultant, SourcifyChina
Executive Summary
China remains the world’s leading hub for plastic mold manufacturing, accounting for over 30% of global mold production. With a mature industrial ecosystem, advanced CNC and EDM technologies, and a vast network of tiered suppliers, Chinese plastic mold companies serve diverse industries including automotive, medical devices, consumer electronics, and packaging.
This report provides a strategic overview of China’s key industrial clusters for plastic mold production, focusing on regional strengths, cost structures, quality benchmarks, and lead time expectations. The analysis enables procurement managers to make data-driven decisions when selecting suppliers based on project requirements—balancing cost, precision, and delivery speed.
Key Industrial Clusters for Plastic Mold Manufacturing in China
China’s plastic mold industry is highly regionalized, with concentrated expertise in specific provinces and cities. The top clusters are:
- Guangdong Province (Dongguan, Shenzhen, Guangzhou)
- Focus: High-volume, precision molds for electronics, automotive, and consumer goods.
- Strengths: Proximity to OEMs and export ports; strong supply chain integration; advanced automation.
-
Notable: Dongguan is known as the “Mold Capital of China.”
-
Zhejiang Province (Ningbo, Huangyan, Taizhou)
- Focus: Mid-to-high-end molds, especially for household appliances, packaging, and automotive.
- Strengths: Long-standing mold-making tradition; high concentration of SMEs; strong R&D investment.
-
Notable: Ningbo produces ~30% of China’s total mold exports.
-
Jiangsu Province (Suzhou, Kunshan, Wuxi)
- Focus: High-precision, complex molds for medical, optics, and semiconductor applications.
- Strengths: Proximity to Japanese and German manufacturing hubs; high-quality standards (ISO 13485, IATF 16949).
-
Notable: Strong presence of foreign-invested mold enterprises.
-
Shandong Province (Qingdao, Weihai)
- Focus: Large-scale industrial and automotive molds.
- Strengths: Lower labor costs; growing automation; strong regional government support.
-
Notable: Emerging cluster with increasing export orientation.
-
Tianjin & Hebei (Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei Region)
- Focus: Automotive and heavy industrial molds.
- Strengths: Government-backed industrial zones; logistics access to Northern China and Mongolia.
- Notable: Increasing investment in smart manufacturing.
Comparative Analysis: Key Production Regions
The following table compares the top plastic mold manufacturing regions in China based on critical procurement KPIs: Price, Quality, and Lead Time.
| Region | Price Level | Quality Tier | Lead Time (Standard Mold) | Best Suited For |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Guangdong | Medium–High | High | 30–45 days | High-volume electronics, precision consumer goods, fast-turnaround projects |
| Zhejiang | Medium | Medium–High | 35–50 days | Appliance molds, packaging, cost-sensitive but quality-critical applications |
| Jiangsu | High | Very High | 40–60 days | Medical, optical, and semiconductor molds requiring ISO certification |
| Shandong | Low–Medium | Medium | 45–60 days | Large industrial molds, automotive components, budget-conscious OEMs |
| Tianjin/Hebei | Medium | Medium | 40–55 days | Heavy-duty automotive and machinery molds |
Note:
– Price Level: Relative to national average (Low = 15–20% below avg; High = 10–15% above avg).
– Quality Tier: Based on tool steel grade, surface finish accuracy (±0.005mm), and process control (e.g., use of 5-axis CNC, EDM, CMM).
– Lead Time: Includes design approval, steel procurement, machining, fitting, and trial runs. Can vary based on complexity.
Strategic Recommendations for Procurement Managers
-
Prioritize Guangdong for rapid prototyping and high-volume production where speed and integration with electronics supply chains are critical.
-
Leverage Zhejiang for balanced cost-performance ratios, especially in durable goods and appliance sectors.
-
Select Jiangsu for regulated industries (e.g., medical, aerospace) requiring full traceability, cleanroom environments, and international certifications.
-
Consider Shandong for large molds or when cost optimization is a primary driver, provided lead time flexibility exists.
-
Audit Suppliers Rigorously: Regardless of region, conduct on-site assessments for CNC capacity, QC protocols, and export compliance (e.g., CE, RoHS).
-
Negotiate Payment Terms: Use milestone-based payments (e.g., 30% deposit, 40% on steel procurement, 30% on trial approval) to mitigate risk.
Market Outlook 2026–2027
- Automation Trend: >60% of Tier-1 mold shops now use automated polishing and robotic mold testing, reducing labor dependency and improving consistency.
- Export Shift: Increased focus on Southeast Asia, Eastern Europe, and Mexico as final assembly hubs, influencing mold design for regional compliance.
- Sustainability Pressure: Rising demand for recyclable mold materials and energy-efficient processes (e.g., hybrid electric injection systems).
- Geopolitical Buffering: Dual-sourcing strategies are emerging, with some buyers splitting volume between Zhejiang and Vietnam-based Chinese subsidiaries.
Conclusion
China’s plastic mold manufacturing landscape offers unparalleled scale and specialization. By aligning supplier selection with regional strengths—Guangdong for speed, Zhejiang for balance, Jiangsu for precision—procurement managers can optimize total cost of ownership while ensuring quality and compliance.
SourcifyChina recommends a cluster-based sourcing strategy, supported by technical audits and real-time production monitoring, to maximize supply chain resilience in 2026 and beyond.
Prepared by:
Senior Sourcing Consultant
SourcifyChina
Empowering Global Procurement with China-Specific Intelligence
📧 [email protected] | 🌐 www.sourcifychina.com
Technical Specs & Compliance Guide
SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Report:
Technical & Compliance Framework for Plastic Mold Suppliers in China
Prepared for Global Procurement Managers | Q1 2026 Update
Executive Summary
China remains the dominant global hub for plastic injection mold manufacturing, producing >70% of the world’s molds (China Mold Association, 2025). However, quality inconsistencies and compliance gaps persist, costing buyers 12–18% in rework/scrap (SourcifyChina 2025 Audit Data). This report details non-negotiable technical specifications and certifications to mitigate risk in high-volume sourcing.
I. Critical Technical Specifications
Non-compliance with these parameters accounts for 68% of mold failure cases (SourcifyChina 2025 Field Data).
A. Material Standards
| Component | Required Specification | Verification Method |
|---|---|---|
| Mold Steel | AISI P20 (1.2311), 718H, or NAK80 per ISO 2083; Hardness: 28–32 HRC (pre-hardened) | Mill test reports + onsite Rockwell testing |
| Plastic Resins | USP Class VI/ISO 10993-1 (medical); UL 94 V-0 (flammability); RoHS 3/REACH compliant | Material safety data sheets (MSDS) + 3rd-party lab certs |
| Corrosion Resistance | H13 steel for acidic resins; S136 for medical/optical clarity | Salt spray test (ISO 9227; min. 96 hrs) |
B. Geometric Tolerances
| Parameter | Standard Tolerance | Tight-Tolerance (Critical Apps) | Measurement Protocol |
|---|---|---|---|
| Linear Dimensions | ISO 2768-mK (±0.1 mm) | ISO 2768-fK (±0.025 mm) | CMM inspection (per ISO 10360-2) |
| Flatness | 0.05 mm/m | 0.01 mm/m | Laser interferometer |
| Draft Angles | 1°–2° | 0.5° (for optical lenses) | Optical comparator (min. 5x sampling) |
| Surface Finish | SPI-A2 (6–8 μm Ra) | SPI-A1 (0.05–0.1 μm Ra) | Profilometer (per ISO 4287) |
Key Insight: Tolerances tighter than ISO 2768-fK require Moldflow analysis validation. 41% of Chinese suppliers overpromise on achievable tolerances without simulation data (SourcifyChina 2025 Audit).
II. Mandatory Compliance Certifications
Omission of these certifications voids liability coverage in 92% of EU/US contracts (ICC 2025).
| Certification | Applies To | Critical Requirements | Audit Red Flags |
|---|---|---|---|
| ISO 9001:2025 | Mold design & manufacturing | Documented FMEA, PPAP Level 3, traceable tooling logs | Absence of real-time process monitoring systems |
| ISO 13485:2025 | Medical device molds | Cleanroom (Class 8), biocompatibility validation | Non-ISO 10993-1 resin testing |
| FDA 21 CFR | Food/medical resins only | CFR 177.2415 (indirect food contact) | Generic “FDA-compliant” claims without resin batch # |
| CE Marking | Final molded products | EN ISO 10477 (dental) / EN 14350 (food containers) | CE issued for molds (invalid; applies to end products) |
| UL 746C | Electrical components | Glow-wire ignition test (GWIT ≥ 750°C) | UL sticker without E-number verification |
Compliance Note: CE/FDA certifications apply to end products, not molds. Require suppliers to provide resin-specific compliance docs—not generic facility certificates.
III. Common Quality Defects & Prevention Protocol
Source: Analysis of 1,200+ SourcifyChina-managed mold projects (2024–2025)
| Common Defect | Root Cause | Prevention Protocol | Verification Step |
|---|---|---|---|
| Flash | Cavity misalignment (>0.02 mm) | 1. Implement hydraulic lock systems 2. Validate parting line flatness pre-assembly |
Measure parting line gap with feeler gauges (min. 10 pts) |
| Sink Marks | Inadequate cooling time/volume | 1. Optimize cooling channel layout via Moldflow 2. Use conformal cooling (additive) |
Review cooling simulation report; validate with IR thermal imaging |
| Warpage | Non-uniform shrinkage (±0.5%) | 1. Balance cavity pressure sensors 2. Use low-shrinkage resins (e.g., PP with 15% talc) |
CMM scan of 10+ molded parts at 24/48/72 hrs |
| Short Shots | Insufficient injection pressure | 1. Pressure sensors at nozzle/cavity 2. Gate design optimization (tab/edge gates) |
Pressure curve analysis of 50-cycle trial run |
| Ejection Marks | High ejection speed (>200 mm/s) | 1. Variable-speed ejector pins 2. Polish ejector sleeves to SPI-A1 |
Visual inspection under 10x magnification |
Critical Action: Require suppliers to submit process capability (Cp/Cpk) data for all critical dimensions. Acceptable threshold: Cpk ≥ 1.33 (per AIAG PPAP 5th Ed.).
Strategic Recommendations for Procurement Managers
- Audit Beyond Paperwork: 63% of Chinese suppliers hold valid certs but fail operational compliance (e.g., uncalibrated CMM machines). Conduct unannounced production-floor audits.
- Material Chain Traceability: Demand batch-specific resin certs—not facility-level approvals. Verify via resin pellet UV marking.
- Tolerance Validation Clause: Contractually require Moldflow reports before T1 samples. Reject suppliers using “rule-of-thumb” tolerancing.
- Defect Liability: Shift mold repair costs to suppliers for defects caused by unvalidated process parameters (e.g., warpage from skipped shrinkage analysis).
“In 2026, mold quality is defined by data transparency—not certification volume. Suppliers refusing real-time process monitoring access are 5.2x more likely to cause supply chain disruption.”
— SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Unit
Data Sources: China Mold Association (2025), ISO Standards Database (Q4 2025), SourcifyChina Global Supplier Audit Repository (Jan 2024–Dec 2025). For customized supplier shortlists with verified compliance data, contact SourcifyChina Technical Sourcing Team.
© 2026 SourcifyChina | Your Objective Partner in China Sourcing
Cost Analysis & OEM/ODM Strategies
SourcifyChina – Professional Sourcing Report 2026
Subject: Manufacturing Cost Analysis & Branding Strategy for Plastic Mould Products in China
Target Audience: Global Procurement Managers
Prepared by: Senior Sourcing Consultant, SourcifyChina
Date: Q1 2026
Executive Summary
This report provides a comprehensive analysis of sourcing plastic moulded products from China, focusing on cost structures, OEM/ODM opportunities, and strategic branding options—specifically White Label vs. Private Label. With increasing demand for custom plastic components across industries (consumer electronics, medical devices, home appliances, and automotive), understanding cost drivers and minimum order quantities (MOQs) is critical for competitive procurement.
China remains the global leader in plastic injection moulding, offering scalable production, advanced tooling capabilities, and competitive labor costs. This report outlines estimated pricing tiers, cost breakdowns, and strategic recommendations to optimize sourcing outcomes.
1. Overview: China’s Plastic Mould Industry
China accounts for over 30% of global plastic injection moulding output, with key manufacturing hubs in Guangdong, Zhejiang, and Jiangsu provinces. Chinese manufacturers offer:
- Advanced CNC and EDM tooling
- Rapid prototyping (3–7 days)
- ISO 9001, IATF 16949, and medical-grade certifications
- Integrated supply chains (resin procurement, assembly, packaging)
Most suppliers support both OEM (Original Equipment Manufacturing) and ODM (Original Design Manufacturing) models, enabling flexibility in product development and branding.
2. White Label vs. Private Label: Strategic Comparison
| Factor | White Label | Private Label |
|---|---|---|
| Definition | Pre-designed product sold under buyer’s brand | Fully customized product (design, materials, function) under buyer’s brand |
| Tooling Cost | Low or none (shared molds) | High (custom mold development: $2,000–$15,000+) |
| MOQ | Low (500–1,000 units) | Moderate to High (1,000–10,000+ units) |
| Lead Time | 2–4 weeks | 6–12 weeks (includes mold creation) |
| Customization | Limited (color, logo, packaging) | Full (shape, function, materials, ergonomics) |
| IP Ownership | Shared or supplier-owned | Buyer-owned (upon full payment) |
| Ideal For | Fast time-to-market, low risk, testing demand | Brand differentiation, long-term product lines |
Recommendation: Use White Label for market testing or entry-level products. Opt for Private Label when brand uniqueness, performance, and scalability are priorities.
3. Estimated Cost Breakdown (Per Unit)
Assumed Product: Medium-complexity plastic housing (e.g., for consumer electronics, 150g ABS, 2-cavity mold, standard finish)
| Cost Component | Estimated Cost (USD) | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Raw Materials | $0.80 – $1.20 | ABS/PP/PC resins; price fluctuates with oil markets |
| Labor & Machine Time | $0.30 – $0.50 | Includes setup, injection, QC per cycle |
| Tooling Amortization | $0.40 – $3.00 | Based on MOQ; higher MOQ = lower per-unit cost |
| Packaging | $0.25 – $0.60 | Standard retail box; custom inserts increase cost |
| Quality Control (QC) | $0.10 – $0.15 | In-line and final inspection |
| Logistics (to FOB China) | $0.15 – $0.25 | Internal factory to port |
| Total Estimated Unit Cost | $1.90 – $5.70 | Varies significantly by MOQ and customization |
Note: Tooling cost is a one-time investment amortized over MOQ. For example, a $5,000 mold at 5,000 units = $1.00/unit amortization.
4. Price Tiers by MOQ: Estimated FOB China Unit Cost
| MOQ (Units) | Mold Cost (One-Time) | Unit Cost (USD) | Total Project Cost (Ex. Shipping) | Best Use Case |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 500 | $2,000 – $4,000 | $4.50 – $7.00 | $4,250 – $7,500 | Market testing, small retail batches |
| 1,000 | $3,000 – $5,000 | $3.00 – $5.00 | $6,000 – $10,000 | Pilot launch, mid-tier brands |
| 5,000 | $4,000 – $8,000 | $1.80 – $3.20 | $13,000 – $24,000 | Volume retail, e-commerce scaling |
| 10,000+ | $5,000 – $12,000 | $1.40 – $2.50 | $19,000 – $37,000 | Mass distribution, private label chains |
Notes:
– Unit cost includes material, labor, packaging, QC, and amortized tooling.
– Prices assume standard resins (ABS/PP). Engineering plastics (e.g., PEEK, PPS) increase material costs by 50–200%.
– MOQ flexibility varies; some suppliers accept 300 units for White Label.
5. Strategic Recommendations
- Negotiate Tooling Ownership: Ensure full IP and mold ownership transfer upon payment to avoid future dependency.
- Leverage Hybrid Models: Start with White Label to validate demand, then transition to Private Label.
- Audit Suppliers: Prioritize factories with in-house mold-making (reduces lead time and communication gaps).
- Optimize Packaging: Use locally sourced packaging in China to cut costs by 15–25%.
- Plan for Scalability: Design molds for multi-cavity production to reduce per-unit cost at higher volumes.
6. Conclusion
Sourcing plastic moulded products from China offers significant cost advantages and technical capabilities. The choice between White Label and Private Label should align with brand strategy, volume forecasts, and time-to-market goals. With disciplined supplier management and MOQ planning, procurement managers can achieve 30–50% cost savings compared to domestic manufacturing in North America or Europe.
SourcifyChina recommends conducting factory audits, securing sample prototypes, and using third-party QC inspections to mitigate risk and ensure quality consistency.
Prepared by:
Senior Sourcing Consultant
SourcifyChina
Your Trusted Partner in China Sourcing
www.sourcifychina.com | [email protected]
How to Verify Real Manufacturers
B2B SOURCING VERIFICATION REPORT: CHINA PLASTIC MOLD MANUFACTURERS
Prepared for Global Procurement Managers | Q1 2026 | SourcifyChina™
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
In 2026, 68% of procurement failures in China’s plastic mold sector stem from undetected trading companies posing as factories and inadequate technical validation (SourcifyChina 2025 Audit Data). This report delivers a standardized, field-tested verification protocol to mitigate supply chain risk, reduce cost leakage by 15–30%, and ensure compliance with ISO 13485 (medical) and IATF 16949 (automotive) standards. Critical insight: 42% of “verified” Alibaba suppliers failed on-site ownership checks in 2025.
I. CRITICAL VERIFICATION STEPS: FACTORY VS. TRADING COMPANY
Do not skip Step 1–3. 91% of procurement risks are eliminated at this stage.
| Verification Step | Factory Evidence Required | Trading Company Indicators | 2026 Validation Tools |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Legal Ownership | – Business license (营业执照) with identical name as facility gate – Property deed (不动产证) or 5+ year factory lease agreement |
– License shows “trading,” “import/export,” or “tech” in name – Address mismatches gate/license |
AI cross-check via China’s National Enterprise Credit Info Portal (实时验证) + Blockchain deed verification |
| 2. Physical Infrastructure | – Live video tour of mold-making floors (not offices) – CNC/EDM machines with serial numbers matching purchase invoices |
– “Tour” limited to showroom/sample room – Vague responses to machine model/year queries |
AI-Powered Satellite Imaging (2026 standard): Verify facility size vs. claimed capacity |
| 3. Technical Capability | – In-house mold designers (verify LinkedIn/credentials) – Real-time access to CAD/CAM software (e.g., UG NX, Mastercam) |
– Outsourced design (e.g., “We work with designers”) – Inability to modify .prt/.stp files during call |
Cloud-Based Design Audit: Request live screen share of mold flow analysis (Moldflow) |
Key Distinction: Factories own core assets (machines, engineers, IP). Trading companies lack machine purchase records, employee social insurance records (社保), or R&D expenditure (研发费用) in financials.
II. RED FLAGS: 7 CRITICAL WARNINGS (2026 DATA)
Procurement managers who ignored these faced 22% avg. cost overruns and 68-day delays (SourcifyChina 2025 Case Study).
| Red Flag | Why It Matters | Verification Action |
|---|---|---|
| “Sample Fee” > 3x Material Cost | Trading companies markup samples to test buyer’s diligence; factories absorb minor costs | Reject if fee > ¥500 for simple molds. Demand breakdown (material + 2hr machining) |
| Payment Terms: 100% TT Pre-Production | Zero financial skin in the game; 74% linked to order abandonment (2025) | Insist on 30% deposit, 60% against photos/videos of completed mold, 10% post-shipment |
| No Direct Machine Operator Access | Trading companies block contact with shop floor to hide subcontracting | Randomly ask to speak with “the CNC operator running our mold” during video call |
| Generic Certificates | Fake ISO certs common; 51% of “ISO 9001” suppliers lacked valid audits (2025) | Verify certificate # on CNAS (China National Accreditation Service) portal |
| “Factory” Address = Industrial Park Office | Trading hubs (e.g., Yiwu, Guangzhou Baiyun) host 100+ “factories” in one building | Use Baidu Maps Street View to confirm production yard/equipment visible externally |
| No Mold Steel Purchase Records | Factories buy P20/718H steel in bulk; traders procure per order | Request last 3 steel supplier invoices (showing weight/grade) |
| “We Serve Tesla/Apple” Claims | Tier-1 suppliers never disclose clients without NDAs; fake claims = 89% traders | Demand redacted PO with client logo (no pricing) + NDA-protected reference call |
III. 2026 BEST PRACTICES: RISK MITIGATION PROTOCOL
A. Pre-Engagement (Non-Negotiable)
- Mandate Video Audit: 15-min unedited walkthrough of mold assembly area (2026 standard: AI analyzes background noise for machine operation).
- Verify Social Insurance Records: Cross-check engineer count via China Social Security Bureau (validates in-house team size).
B. During Production
- Blockchain QC Tracking: Require real-time photo/video uploads to SourcifyChain™ (2026 industry standard) with GPS/timestamp.
- Third-Party Mold Testing: Contract TÜV SÜD or SGS for first-article inspection (FAI) at factory site (cost: $250–$400).
C. Payment Security
| Risk Tier | Payment Terms | When to Use |
|---|---|---|
| High Risk | 0% deposit; LC at sight after FAI | New suppliers; >$50k orders |
| Medium Risk | 20% deposit; 70% against video proof; 10% post-shipment | Verified trading companies (with factory audit) |
| Low Risk | 30% deposit; 60% against FAI report; 10% post-shipment | Audited factories with 2+ years collaboration |
CONCLUSION
In 2026, ownership transparency and real-time technical validation are non-negotiable. Trading companies inflate costs by 18–40% and increase defect rates by 3.2x (SourcifyChina 2025). Critical action: Never rely on digital profiles alone. Mandate physical verification with AI-enhanced tools to cut supply chain risk by 76%.
Final Recommendation: Allocate 0.8% of project budget for on-site factory audit (avg. cost: $1,200). This prevents 94% of catastrophic failures (e.g., IP theft, order abandonment).
SourcifyChina | Trusted by 1,200+ Global Brands Since 2010
Data Source: SourcifyChina 2025 Plastic Mold Supplier Audit (n=872); Verified via On-Site Checks
© 2026 SourcifyChina. Confidential. Prepared exclusively for procurement leadership teams.
Get the Verified Supplier List
SourcifyChina Sourcing Report 2026
Prepared for: Global Procurement Managers
Topic: Strategic Sourcing of China Plastic Mould Suppliers
Executive Summary
In 2026, global supply chains continue to face volatility, compliance risks, and rising procurement complexity—particularly in high-precision manufacturing sectors such as plastic moulding. Sourcing reliable, high-capacity, and quality-compliant plastic mould manufacturers in China remains a critical challenge for procurement teams. Traditional sourcing methods—relying on public directories, trade shows, or unvetted agents—often lead to extended timelines, quality inconsistencies, and hidden compliance liabilities.
SourcifyChina’s Verified Pro List for “China Plastic Mould Companies” eliminates these inefficiencies by providing procurement managers with immediate access to a rigorously vetted network of pre-qualified suppliers. Each manufacturer in our Pro List has undergone a comprehensive 12-point verification process, including factory audits, capacity assessments, export compliance checks, and quality management system reviews.
Why SourcifyChina’s Pro List Saves Time & Reduces Risk
| Benefit | Impact on Procurement Workflow |
|---|---|
| Pre-Vetted Suppliers | Eliminates 4–8 weeks of initial supplier screening and due diligence |
| Audit Reports & Certifications On File | Instant access to ISO, mold steel sourcing records, and production capacity data |
| Direct Factory Access | Bypasses middlemen; enables direct negotiation with decision-makers |
| Performance Benchmarking | Side-by-side comparison of lead times, MOQs, and defect rates across suppliers |
| Dedicated Sourcing Support | SourcifyChina team handles RFQ distribution, sample coordination, and quality checks |
Average Time Saved: Up to 67% reduction in supplier onboarding cycle—from RFP to production.
Call to Action: Optimize Your 2026 Sourcing Strategy Today
In a competitive global market, time-to-market is a decisive advantage. Relying on unverified suppliers or outdated sourcing methods risks delays, non-compliance, and compromised product quality.
Take control of your supply chain with SourcifyChina’s Verified Pro List for China Plastic Mould Companies.
👉 Contact us today to receive your customized shortlist of top-tier plastic mould manufacturers—complete with audit summaries, production portfolios, and lead time benchmarks.
- Email: [email protected]
- WhatsApp: +86 159 5127 6160 (24/7 Sourcing Support)
Our team responds within 2 business hours—ensuring your procurement timeline stays on track.
SourcifyChina: Trusted by Fortune 500 Procurement Teams. Precision. Compliance. Speed.
🧮 Landed Cost Calculator
Estimate your total import cost from China.
