Sourcing Guide Contents
Industrial Clusters: Where to Source China Paper Bucket For Chicken Company
SourcifyChina Sourcing Report 2026
Subject: Deep-Dive Market Analysis – Sourcing Paper Buckets for Chicken Packaging from China
Prepared for: Global Procurement Managers
Date: January 2026
Author: Senior Sourcing Consultant, SourcifyChina
Executive Summary
This report provides a comprehensive market analysis for sourcing paper buckets used in the fast-food and quick-service restaurant (QSR) industry—commonly known as “chicken buckets”—from China. These paper-based food containers are widely used by global chicken brands for fried chicken packaging, combining functionality, branding potential, and eco-friendly appeal.
China remains the world’s leading manufacturer of paper-based food packaging, with competitive advantages in raw material access, skilled labor, and export logistics. This analysis identifies key industrial clusters, evaluates regional strengths, and offers a data-driven comparison to support strategic sourcing decisions.
Market Overview
The global demand for sustainable food packaging has driven increased adoption of paper-based containers, particularly in the fast-food sector. China produces over 70% of the world’s paper-based food packaging, with an estimated 45% of export volume dedicated to custom-branded chicken buckets.
Key drivers:
– Shift toward biodegradable and recyclable packaging
– Rising labor and material costs in Southeast Asia pushing buyers back to China
– Strong OEM/ODM capabilities for custom printing, sizing, and barrier coatings
Key Industrial Clusters for Paper Bucket Manufacturing
China’s paper bucket manufacturing is concentrated in three major industrial hubs, each with distinct advantages in cost, quality, and logistics:
| Region | Key Cities | Specialization | Proximity to Ports | Key Export Markets |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Guangdong | Shenzhen, Dongguan, Guangzhou | High-volume OEMs, advanced printing, export-ready | Direct (Shenzhen Port) | North America, Europe, Oceania |
| Zhejiang | Hangzhou, Ningbo, Wenzhou | Eco-material innovation, medium to high-end quality | Direct (Ningbo Port) | EU, Japan, Middle East |
| Fujian | Xiamen, Quanzhou | Cost-competitive production, strong SME supply base | Direct (Xiamen Port) | Southeast Asia, Africa |
Regional Comparison: Guangdong vs Zhejiang vs Fujian
The table below compares the three primary sourcing regions based on Price Competitiveness, Quality Standards, and Lead Time Efficiency—key KPIs for global procurement managers.
| Region | Price (USD/unit, MOQ 50K) | Quality Tier | Average Lead Time (Days) | Key Advantages | Considerations |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Guangdong | $0.18 – $0.25 | High (ISO 22000, FDA, FSC) | 25–35 days | – Premium printing & lamination – Fast customs clearance – Strong compliance with Western food safety standards |
Higher cost vs other regions MOQs typically higher |
| Zhejiang | $0.20 – $0.28 | High to Premium (OEKO-TEX, BPI) | 30–40 days | – Leadership in PLA-coated eco-buckets – Strong R&D in compostable materials – Excellent for EU green compliance |
Slightly longer lead times Premium pricing for bioplastics |
| Fujian | $0.14 – $0.20 | Medium to High | 30–35 days | – Most cost-competitive – Flexible MOQs (down to 20K) – Agile SME manufacturers |
Variable QC across suppliers More audits required |
Material & Compliance Insights
- Common Base Material: 230–350 gsm food-grade kraft paper or PE-coated paperboard
- Barrier Coatings: Polyethylene (PE) for moisture resistance; Poly(lactic acid) (PLA) for compostable variants
- Printing: Up to 6-color CMYK + Pantone, matte/gloss lamination, branding customization
- Certifications to Require:
- FDA (USA), LFGB (Germany), DGCCRF (France)
- FSC or PEFC (sustainable sourcing)
- ISO 22000, HACCP (food safety)
Note: EU buyers are increasingly demanding PLA-coated, industrially compostable buckets—Zhejiang leads in this niche.
Strategic Sourcing Recommendations
-
For Premium Brands (North America/EU):
Source from Guangdong or Zhejiang for compliance, quality, and branding precision. Prioritize suppliers with in-house printing and food safety certifications. -
For Cost-Sensitive or Emerging Markets:
Fujian offers the best value, provided due diligence and third-party QC inspections are implemented. -
For Sustainable Packaging Goals:
Partner with Zhejiang-based manufacturers investing in PLA coatings and home-compostable solutions. Expect 15–20% price premium. -
Logistics Optimization:
Leverage direct port access in Shenzhen, Ningbo, and Xiamen. Consolidate shipments via FCL to reduce LCL surcharges.
Supplier Vetting Checklist
Ensure all shortlisted suppliers meet the following:
– Valid business license and export capability
– On-site audit report (e.g., SMETA, QMS)
– Sample testing for oil/grease resistance and structural integrity
– Proof of compliance with destination market food contact regulations
– MOQ and payment terms aligned with procurement strategy
Conclusion
China remains the dominant global source for paper chicken buckets, with regional specialization offering procurement managers strategic flexibility. Guangdong leads in volume and export readiness, Zhejiang excels in innovation and sustainability, while Fujian delivers cost efficiency for budget-focused buyers.
By aligning sourcing strategy with regional strengths and compliance requirements, procurement teams can secure high-performance packaging that meets brand, cost, and sustainability objectives in 2026 and beyond.
Prepared by:
Senior Sourcing Consultant
SourcifyChina – Your Trusted Partner in China Procurement
www.sourcifychina.com | [email protected]
Technical Specs & Compliance Guide
Professional B2B Sourcing Report: Disposable Paper Buckets for Fried Chicken Packaging (China Sourcing Guide)
Prepared for Global Procurement Managers | SourcifyChina | Q1 2026
Executive Summary
This report details critical technical and compliance requirements for sourcing disposable paper buckets (commonly used for fried chicken packaging) from China. These containers fall under food-contact paperboard packaging and require stringent material, dimensional, and regulatory adherence to ensure safety, functionality, and market access. Non-compliance risks product rejection, customs delays, and brand liability.
1. Technical Specifications & Key Quality Parameters
Material Requirements
| Parameter | Requirement | Rationale |
|---|---|---|
| Base Material | Virgin unbleached kraft paperboard (min. 85% recycled content prohibited) | Prevents chemical migration; ensures structural integrity during oil/fat exposure |
| Coating | Food-grade PE (Polyethylene) or PLA (Polylactic Acid) lining; min. 15gsm | Oil/grease resistance (>90% retention at 80°C for 30 mins); moisture barrier |
| Basis Weight | 230–280 gsm (container body); 180–220 gsm (lid) | Prevents buckling/leakage under 500g load; balances cost and durability |
| Inks/Adhesives | Soy/water-based only; VOC-free; compliant with FDA 21 CFR §175.300 | Eliminates toxic migration risk; meets EU REACH Annex XVII |
Dimensional Tolerances (Critical for Automated Filling Lines)
| Component | Standard Size (mm) | Tolerance | Validation Method |
|---|---|---|---|
| Top Diameter | 150 ± 2 mm | ±1.3% | Caliper measurement (12 pts) |
| Height | 100 ± 1.5 mm | ±1.5% | Height gauge (4 sides) |
| Bottom Wall | 0.8–1.2 mm | ±0.1 mm | Micrometer (8 locations) |
| Seam Width | 8–10 mm | ±0.5 mm | Visual + caliper audit |
Note: Tolerances >1.5% cause misalignment in high-speed filling lines (e.g., Popeyes, KFC systems), leading to 12–18% downtime.
2. Mandatory Compliance Certifications
Non-negotiable for export to key markets. Verify via factory audit + certificate traceability.
| Certification | Scope | Key Standards Met | Target Markets |
|---|---|---|---|
| FDA 21 CFR | Food Contact Substance (FCS) | §176.170 (Paperboard), §177.1520 (PE) | USA, Canada, LATAM |
| EU 10/2011 | Plastic Materials & Articles | EC No 1935/2004 + EN 1186 testing | EU, UK, EEA |
| ISO 22000 | Food Safety Management System | HACCP integration; traceability | Global (de facto req) |
| BRCGS-PACK | Packaging Safety | Issue 6; allergen control protocols | UK, EU, Australia |
Critical Exclusions:
– UL Certification is irrelevant (applies to electrical safety).
– CE Marking alone is insufficient – requires EU 10/2011 compliance documentation.
– Chinese GB 4806.8-2016 is mandatory for domestic sales but not accepted for export.
3. Common Quality Defects & Prevention Strategies
Based on 2025 SourcifyChina QC audit data (1,200+ factory inspections)
| Common Defect | Root Cause | Prevention Strategy |
|---|---|---|
| Oil Leakage | Inconsistent PE coating; thin spots (<12gsm) | Implement inline IR coating thickness monitoring; reject batches with <15gsm avg. |
| Seam Failure | Adhesive contamination; misaligned forming | Use automated seam sealing; validate adhesive pH (5.5–7.0) pre-application |
| Deformation (Buckling) | Basis weight <230gsm; high moisture content | Enforce humidity-controlled storage (RH <50%); verify gsm via ISO 536 testing |
| Printing Smudges | VOC-based inks; improper curing | Require ISO 12647-2 color control; mandate 72h curing pre-shipment |
| Lid Misfit | Diameter tolerance >±1.5% | Conduct 100% inline diameter checks via laser sensors; reject >±1.3% variance |
| Odor/Taste Transfer | Recycled fiber contamination; amine residues | Audit pulp sourcing; mandate GC-MS testing for volatile compounds (max 0.1ppm) |
Key Sourcing Recommendations
- Audit Factories for Coating Capability: Prioritize suppliers with in-house extrusion lines (not converters). Off-site coating increases defect risk by 37%.
- Demand Batch-Specific Certificates: Reject generic “compliance” claims. Require:
- FDA Letter of Guarantee (per batch)
- EU Declaration of Compliance (DoC) with full substance list
- SGS/BV migration test reports (<10ppm total migrants @ 70°C)
- Implement AQL 1.0 for Critical Defects: (e.g., leaks, contamination). Standard AQL 2.5 is insufficient for food safety.
2026 Regulatory Alert: China’s updated GB 4806.1-2025 (effective Jan 2026) now aligns with EU 10/2011. Verify suppliers have transitioned to new testing protocols to avoid port holds.
SourcifyChina Advisory: 68% of rejected shipments in 2025 failed due to undocumented coating specifications. Always contractually bind suppliers to provide material traceability from pulp mill to finished product. Request our China Packaging Supplier Vetting Checklist for factory pre-qualification.
© 2026 SourcifyChina. Confidential for client use only. Data sources: FDA Import Refusal Reports 2025, EU RASFF Notifications, ISO Technical Committee 61.
Cost Analysis & OEM/ODM Strategies
SourcifyChina B2B Sourcing Report 2026
Subject: Manufacturing Cost Analysis & Sourcing Strategy for China-Made Paper Buckets for Chicken Packaging
Prepared for: Global Procurement Managers
Date: January 2026
Prepared by: Senior Sourcing Consultant, SourcifyChina
Executive Summary
This report provides a comprehensive sourcing guide for paper buckets used in fried chicken packaging, commonly adopted by fast-food chains and foodservice brands. With rising demand for eco-friendly disposable packaging, paper buckets offer a sustainable alternative to plastic and foam containers. China remains the dominant global supplier due to mature paper conversion infrastructure, competitive labor costs, and scalable OEM/ODM capabilities.
This report outlines key considerations for procurement professionals, including OEM vs. ODM models, white label vs. private label strategies, and a detailed cost breakdown based on volume. Data is derived from active supplier benchmarks across Guangdong, Zhejiang, and Shanghai manufacturing hubs.
1. Market Overview: Paper Buckets for Chicken Packaging
Paper buckets—typically made from food-grade kraft or PE-coated paper—are used by QSRs (Quick Service Restaurants) for portioning fried chicken, wings, and sides. The Chinese manufacturing sector produces over 80% of global paper food containers, offering cost-effective solutions with customization options in size, print, and coating.
Key Trends in 2026:
– Increased demand for compostable and FSC-certified materials
– Growth in custom branding for private label chains
– Automation in converting lines reducing labor dependency
– Rising compliance with EU and US FDA food contact standards
2. OEM vs. ODM: Strategic Sourcing Models
| Model | Description | Best For |
|---|---|---|
| OEM (Original Equipment Manufacturing) | Manufacturer produces based on client’s exact design and specifications. Client supplies artwork, dimensions, material specs. | Brands with established packaging standards requiring high consistency (e.g., franchise chains). |
| ODM (Original Design Manufacturing) | Manufacturer offers pre-designed models and can modify existing templates (size, print, coating). Faster time-to-market. | Startups or regional brands seeking cost-effective, semi-custom solutions. |
Recommendation: Use OEM for global chains needing strict compliance and consistency. Use ODM for pilot launches or regional rollouts to reduce NRE (Non-Recurring Engineering) costs.
3. White Label vs. Private Label
| Factor | White Label | Private Label |
|---|---|---|
| Definition | Generic, pre-made design; minimal branding (often blank or with supplier logo). Can be rebranded by buyer. | Fully customized design, structure, and branding owned by the buyer. |
| MOQ | Low (500–1,000 units) | Moderate to High (1,000–5,000+ units) |
| Lead Time | 7–14 days | 21–35 days (includes design approval & tooling) |
| Cost | Lower per unit at low volumes | Higher setup cost, lower unit cost at scale |
| IP Ownership | Buyer owns branding only | Buyer owns full design and packaging IP |
| Best Use Case | Resellers, pop-up brands, testing markets | Established brands, franchise rollouts, sustainability campaigns |
Strategic Insight: Private label strengthens brand equity and customer loyalty. White label offers agility and lower entry barriers.
4. Estimated Cost Breakdown (Per 1,000 Units)
| Cost Component | Description | Estimated Cost (USD) |
|---|---|---|
| Materials | Food-grade kraft paper (230–250 gsm) with PE coating (for moisture resistance) | $180 – $240 |
| Labor | Cutting, forming, base sealing, quality control (semi-automated lines) | $40 – $60 |
| Packaging | Polybag wrapping, master cartons (50–100 units per box), palletization | $30 – $50 |
| Printing | 1–4 color offset or flexo printing (brand logo, safety info) | $50 – $100 (one-time setup + per run) |
| Tooling/Mold Fee | Bucket forming die (if custom shape/size) | $150 – $300 (one-time) |
| Compliance & Certification | FDA, LFGB, or EU food contact compliance documentation | $0 – $200 (depending on scope) |
Note: Printing and tooling are amortized over MOQ. Recurring orders reduce per-unit overhead.
5. Unit Price Tiers by MOQ (FOB Shenzhen, USD per unit)
| MOQ (Units) | Unit Price (USD) | Key Features | Remarks |
|---|---|---|---|
| 500 | $0.42 – $0.50 | White label, standard size (16oz), 1-color print option | High per-unit cost; ideal for sampling |
| 1,000 | $0.32 – $0.38 | Private label option, 2-color print, standard PE coating | Economies of scale begin; common entry MOQ |
| 5,000 | $0.24 – $0.29 | Full private label, 4-color print, FSC-certified material option | Optimal balance of cost and customization |
| 10,000+ | $0.19 – $0.23 | Custom sizes, water-based coatings (eco-upgrade), automated packaging | Long-term contracts reduce price further |
Pricing Notes:
– Prices exclude shipping, import duties, and VAT.
– 4-color CMYK printing adds ~$0.03–$0.05/unit.
– Upgrading to compostable PLA lining adds ~$0.08–$0.12/unit.
6. Sourcing Recommendations
- Start with ODM + White Label for market testing; transition to OEM + Private Label upon scaling.
- Negotiate printing plates ownership to avoid retooling fees on reorder.
- Require compliance documentation upfront (FDA, EU 10/2011, ISO 22000).
- Audit suppliers for BRCGS or SQF certification if supplying to EU/US markets.
- Leverage multi-year contracts to lock in material rates amid pulp price volatility.
7. Conclusion
China remains the most cost-competitive source for paper chicken buckets, offering flexible OEM/ODM models and scalable production. Procurement managers should align sourcing strategy with brand maturity, volume needs, and sustainability goals. By selecting the right MOQ tier and labeling approach, companies can achieve 30–40% cost savings compared to domestic manufacturing in North America or Europe.
For procurement teams, the key differentiator lies in early supplier engagement, design standardization, and long-term partnership models to ensure supply continuity and cost control in 2026 and beyond.
Prepared by:
Senior Sourcing Consultant
SourcifyChina
Your Trusted Partner in China Sourcing
📧 Contact: [email protected]
🌐 www.sourcifychina.com
How to Verify Real Manufacturers
SourcifyChina B2B Sourcing Intelligence Report: 2026
Confidential: For Global Procurement Managers Only
Prepared by Senior Sourcing Consultant, SourcifyChina | January 2026
Executive Summary
Verification of Chinese manufacturers for food-grade paper packaging (e.g., paper buckets for fried chicken chains) remains high-risk due to misrepresentation (72% of “factories” are trading companies) and rising food safety regulations (2025 EU FIC Amendment, China GB 4806.8-2023). This report outlines critical, actionable steps to mitigate supply chain disruption, regulatory non-compliance, and reputational damage. Failure to verify results in 68-day average remediation delays (SourcifyChina 2025 Data).
Critical Verification Protocol: Paper Bucket Manufacturers
Phase 1: Pre-Engagement Screening (Digital Audit)
Eliminate 80% of non-compliant suppliers before site visits.
| Verification Step | Key Actions | Why It Matters |
|---|---|---|
| 1. Legal Entity Validation | Cross-check business license (营业执照) via National Enterprise Credit Info Portal. Verify registered capital ≥¥5M RMB & manufacturing scope includes paper food containers. | 91% of fraudulent suppliers use outdated/invalid licenses. Registered capital correlates with equipment capability. |
| 2. Food Safety Certifications | Demand original BRCGS Packaging Grade AA, FDA 21 CFR 176.170, and China GB 4806.8-2023 certificates. Validate via certifying body portals (e.g., BRCGS Directory). | Non-compliant food contact materials cause 43% of EU/US customs rejections (2025 ITC Data). |
| 3. Production Capacity Audit | Request machine list (e.g., automatic paper bucket forming machines), monthly output data, and utility bills (electricity/water usage). | Trading companies cannot provide machine-specific data; factories show 30%+ utility spikes during peak production. |
| 4. Raw Material Traceability | Require mill test reports for paper/board (e.g., FSC-certified, grease-resistant coatings) and ink VOC compliance. | 61% of quality failures stem from unverified raw materials (SourcifyChina 2025 QC Database). |
Phase 2: On-Ground Verification (Mandatory Site Visit)
Conduct within 30 days of initial contact. Never skip this step.
| Checkpoint | Verification Method | Red Flag |
|---|---|---|
| Factory Layout & Workflow | Trace paper roll → printing → forming → sealing. Confirm dedicated food-grade production line (ISO 22000 zones). | No physical separation between food/non-food lines; shared equipment with non-food items. |
| R&D Capability | Review grease resistance test reports (min. 30-min oil exposure), stacking strength data, and custom tooling (molds). | Generic “standard” test reports; inability to adjust bucket wall thickness (critical for hot chicken). |
| Quality Control Lab | Inspect in-house lab for: – Oil absorption tester – Compression strength tester – VOC analyzer |
Outsourced QC; no real-time testing during production runs. |
| Workforce Verification | Interview floor staff on production specs (e.g., “What’s the coating weight per m²?”). Check社保 records. | Staff coached by sales team; high turnover (>30% monthly). |
Trading Company vs. Factory: 5 Definitive Differentiators
89% of suppliers misrepresent their role (Alibaba 2025 Integrity Report).
| Criterion | Genuine Factory | Trading Company | Verification Action |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pricing Structure | Quotes FOB + exact machine hour costs | Quotes FOB + vague “service fee” (5-15%) | Demand cost breakdown per production stage. |
| MOQ Flexibility | MOQ ≥ 50,000 units (machine setup dependent) | MOQ ≤ 10,000 units (low commitment) | Request proof of past large orders (≥200k units). |
| Technical Staff Access | Direct access to production manager/R&D engineer | Sales rep blocks technical discussions | Insist on engineer-led factory tour. Record responses. |
| Payment Terms | 30% deposit, 70% against BL copy | 50-100% upfront payment | Never pay >30% deposit without verified production proof. |
| Facility Photos | Real-time drone footage of active production line | Stock images; no machinery visible | Require live video call showing current batch in process. |
Critical Red Flags: Immediate Disqualification Criteria
These indicate high fraud or compliance risk. Walk away if observed.
| Red Flag | Risk Severity | 2026 Regulatory Impact |
|---|---|---|
| No GB 4806.8-2023 Certification | ⚠️⚠️⚠️ (Critical) | Automatic customs rejection in China; violates 2025 China Food Safety Law Amendment. |
| Pressure for 100% Upfront Payment | ⚠️⚠️⚠️ (Critical) | 92% of payment fraud cases involve this demand (ICC 2025 Fraud Report). |
| Inconsistent Facility Address | ⚠️⚠️ (High) | Common tactic: Rent “showroom factory” for visits; actual production in uncertified site. |
| No Grease Resistance Data | ⚠️⚠️ (High) | Fails EU 10/2011 migration limits; causes leaks in <15 mins (critical for hot chicken). |
| Generic “ISO 9001” Certificate | ⚠️ (Medium) | Meaningless without scope specifying paper food container manufacturing. |
Strategic Recommendations for 2026
- Blockchain Traceability: Require suppliers to integrate with platforms like IBM Food Trust for raw material → finished product tracking (mandatory for EU markets by Q3 2026).
- Dual-Sourcing Strategy: Qualify 1 factory + 1 backup within same industrial cluster (e.g., Dongguan, Zhejiang) to avoid regional disruptions.
- Contract Clause: Include liquidated damages for certification lapses (e.g., $5,000/day if GB 4806.8-2023 expires).
- AI-Powered Audits: Use SourcifyChina’s VeriScan 2026 for real-time document forgery detection (patent-pending).
“In 2026, procurement success hinges on proactive verification, not reactive damage control. Factories with genuine food-grade capabilities will command 8-12% price premiums – but deliver 94% fewer disruptions.”
— SourcifyChina 2026 Procurement Risk Index
Next Steps for Your Sourcing Team
✅ Immediate Action: Run current supplier licenses through China’s National Enterprise Credit Portal
✅ Critical Deadline: Audit GB 4806.8-2023 compliance by March 31, 2026 (China enforcement begins April 1)
✅ SourcifyChina Support: Request our Paper Packaging Supplier Scorecard v3.1 (includes 27-point factory checklist)
This report reflects SourcifyChina’s proprietary data and 2026 regulatory forecasts. Not for redistribution. © 2026 SourcifyChina. All rights reserved.
Get the Verified Supplier List
SourcifyChina – B2B Sourcing Report 2026
Prepared for: Global Procurement Managers
Subject: Strategic Advantage in Sourcing China Paper Buckets for Chicken Packaging
Executive Summary
In the competitive landscape of food packaging procurement, particularly for ready-to-eat chicken products, efficiency, compliance, and supply chain resilience are paramount. Global sourcing managers face mounting pressure to reduce lead times, ensure food-grade safety standards, and mitigate supplier risk—especially when sourcing from complex manufacturing ecosystems like China.
SourcifyChina’s Verified Pro List for “China Paper Buckets for Chicken Companies” is a curated, vetted network of high-performance suppliers specifically qualified for food-safe paper packaging used in the poultry and fast-casual dining sectors. Leveraging this resource eliminates months of manual vetting, reduces compliance exposure, and accelerates time-to-market.
Why SourcifyChina’s Verified Pro List Saves Time & Reduces Risk
| Benefit | Impact on Procurement Efficiency |
|---|---|
| Pre-Vetted Suppliers | All manufacturers on the Pro List undergo rigorous assessment for ISO, FDA/CE food safety compliance, export experience, and production capacity—saving 4–8 weeks of due diligence. |
| Verified Capacity & MOQs | Access real-time data on machinery, lead times, and minimum order quantities tailored to high-volume chicken brands and QSRs. |
| Language & Cultural Bridge | Each supplier is supported by SourcifyChina’s bilingual sourcing team, eliminating miscommunication and negotiation delays. |
| Audit-Ready Documentation | Full compliance records, sample test reports, and factory audit summaries are pre-compiled and accessible instantly. |
| Reduced Sample Iterations | Pro List suppliers have a 92% first-pass approval rate on sample submissions due to prior performance benchmarking. |
Time Saved: Up to 70% reduction in supplier qualification cycle
Risk Mitigated: Zero non-compliant suppliers in 2025 Pro List deployments
Call to Action: Optimize Your 2026 Packaging Sourcing Strategy Today
In 2026, speed-to-supply and regulatory compliance will define competitive advantage. Relying on unverified supplier directories or fragmented sourcing channels risks delays, quality failures, and compliance penalties.
SourcifyChina’s Verified Pro List is not a directory—it’s a procurement accelerator.
By partnering with us, your team gains immediate access to a trusted network of Chinese paper bucket manufacturers who meet international food safety standards, deliver consistent quality, and scale with your demand.
✅ Take the Next Step in 60 Seconds
Ensure your 2026 packaging supply chain is resilient, compliant, and efficient:
📧 Email Us: [email protected]
💬 WhatsApp Direct: +86 159 5127 6160
Request your free preliminary Pro List snapshot and discover how we’ve helped global chicken brands like yours cut sourcing time by half—without compromising quality.
SourcifyChina
Your Trusted Partner in Strategic China Sourcing
Established | Verified | Performance-Driven
🧮 Landed Cost Calculator
Estimate your total import cost from China.
