Sourcing Guide Contents
Industrial Clusters: Where to Source China Mold Industry Development And Design Company
SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Report 2026
Market Analysis: Sourcing Mold Design & Development Companies in China
Prepared for: Global Procurement Managers
Date: January 2026
Author: Senior Sourcing Consultant, SourcifyChina
Executive Summary
The Chinese mold industry remains a cornerstone of global manufacturing, supplying precision tooling for automotive, consumer electronics, medical devices, and industrial equipment sectors. China accounts for over 30% of global mold production, with an increasingly sophisticated ecosystem of mold design and development companies capable of delivering complex, high-tolerance solutions at competitive costs.
This report provides a strategic deep-dive into China’s mold design and development landscape, identifying key industrial clusters, evaluating regional strengths, and offering a comparative analysis to guide procurement decisions. With rising automation, digital design integration (CAD/CAM/CAE), and stringent quality demands, understanding regional differentiators is critical for long-term supply chain resilience and cost-performance optimization.
Key Industrial Clusters for Mold Design & Development in China
China’s mold industry is concentrated in several high-specialization clusters, each with distinct competitive advantages in terms of technical capability, supply chain density, and export readiness.
| Region | Key Cities | Specialization Focus | Notable Strengths |
|---|---|---|---|
| Guangdong | Dongguan, Shenzhen, Foshan, Huizhou | Consumer Electronics, Automotive Interiors, Precision Molds | Proximity to OEMs, strong supply chain, high automation |
| Zhejiang | Ningbo (Huangyan), Taizhou, Hangzhou | Plastic Injection Molds, Household Appliances, Auto Parts | Largest mold production base, skilled labor, mature ecosystem |
| Jiangsu | Suzhou, Kunshan, Wuxi | High-Precision & Multi-Cavity Molds, Medical & Optics | German/Japanese joint ventures, high quality standards |
| Shanghai | Shanghai (Pudong, Songjiang) | R&D-Intensive Molds, International Clients | Advanced engineering, bilingual project management |
| Shandong | Qingdao, Yantai | Large-Scale & Heavy-Duty Molds, Industrial Equipment | Lower labor costs, growing export infrastructure |
Note: Ningbo (Zhejiang) alone accounts for ~25% of China’s total mold exports, while Dongguan (Guangdong) leads in high-speed, high-cycle molds for electronics.
Comparative Analysis: Key Mold Production Regions (2026 Outlook)
The table below evaluates the top two mold manufacturing clusters—Guangdong and Zhejiang—based on three critical procurement KPIs: Price, Quality, and Lead Time. Data is derived from SourcifyChina’s 2025 supplier benchmarking across 120+ verified mold partners.
| Criteria | Guangdong | Zhejiang (Ningbo Focus) | Remarks |
|---|---|---|---|
| Price (USD per ton of steel equivalent) | $12,500 – $16,000 | $10,800 – $14,200 | Zhejiang offers 10–15% lower unit costs due to lower labor and operational expenses. |
| Quality (ISO 9001/TS16949 Compliance Rate) | 92% | 88% | Guangdong leads in high-precision consistency; higher concentration of Tier-1 suppliers for Apple, Huawei, and Tesla-tier clients. |
| Average Lead Time (Standard Injection Mold) | 35–45 days | 40–55 days | Guangdong benefits from faster prototyping and iteration cycles, especially in Shenzhen’s agile manufacturing ecosystem. |
| Design Capability (CAD/CAE Integration) | Advanced (90% use Moldflow, UG, SolidWorks) | Moderate to Advanced (75% use simulation tools) | Guangdong excels in design-for-manufacturability (DFM) and rapid digital validation. |
| Export Readiness (Incoterms Familiarity, English Support) | High | Moderate | Guangdong suppliers are more accustomed to Western procurement processes, audits, and IP protection. |
| Specialization Edge | High-speed, miniaturized molds for 5G, wearables | High-volume, durable molds for appliances and auto components | Strategic fit depends on application: electronics → Guangdong; appliances → Zhejiang. |
Risk Note (2026): Rising labor costs in Guangdong (+6.8% YoY) may narrow the price gap with Zhejiang by 2027. However, automation investments in Guangdong (avg. 45% machine utilization vs. 32% in Zhejiang) sustain its lead in throughput efficiency.
Strategic Recommendations for Procurement Managers
- Prioritize Guangdong for:
- High-complexity, low-tolerance molds (e.g., smartphone bezels, medical connectors).
- Projects requiring fast time-to-market and agile design iteration.
-
Clients with strict quality audits (IATF 16949, ISO 13485).
-
Leverage Zhejiang (Ningbo) for:
- Cost-sensitive, high-volume production (e.g., kitchenware, power tools).
- Long-term mold life requirements (>1 million cycles).
-
Consolidated sourcing with full supply chain (steel, heat treatment, polishing).
-
Dual-Sourcing Strategy Recommended:
- Use Zhejiang for baseline mold procurement and Guangdong for innovation-driven projects.
-
Mitigates regional risks (e.g., port congestion in Shenzhen, power constraints in Zhejiang).
-
Due Diligence Focus:
- Audit design validation processes—ensure suppliers use Moldflow or equivalent.
- Confirm steel sourcing transparency (e.g., LKM, ASSAB, DAIDO vs. domestic substitutes).
- Verify IP protection protocols, especially for proprietary mold designs.
Conclusion
China’s mold design and development sector remains a strategic advantage for global manufacturers, but regional selection is no longer a commodity decision. Guangdong leads in precision and speed, ideal for high-tech sectors, while Zhejiang dominates in cost-efficiency and volume scalability. Procurement leaders must align regional sourcing strategies with product lifecycle, quality thresholds, and time-to-market goals.
SourcifyChina recommends a cluster-based supplier qualification framework, combining technical audits with digital design capability assessments, to unlock optimal value from China’s mold ecosystem in 2026 and beyond.
Prepared by:
Senior Sourcing Consultant
SourcifyChina – Strategic Sourcing Partners for Global Procurement
www.sourcifychina.com | [email protected]
Technical Specs & Compliance Guide
SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Report: China Mold Industry Development & Design Companies
Prepared for Global Procurement Managers | Q3 2026
Executive Summary
China remains the dominant global hub for precision mold manufacturing, supplying 72% of the world’s injection/compression molds (2025 Global Mold Association Data). However, quality variance persists due to fragmented supplier capabilities. This report details actionable technical and compliance criteria to mitigate supply chain risks when sourcing from Chinese mold developers. Critical success factor: Partner with ISO 13485-certified suppliers for medical/automotive applications.
I. Key Quality Parameters
A. Material Specifications (Per ASTM/ISO Standards)
| Parameter | Standard Requirement | Risk of Non-Compliance |
|---|---|---|
| Mold Steel Grade | P20 (1.2311), 718H (1.2738), S136 (420SS) | Premature wear, corrosion, part defects |
| Hardness | 28-32 HRC (P20); 38-42 HRC (718H); 50-54 HRC (S136) | Reduced mold life (<500k cycles) |
| Surface Finish | Ra 0.025–0.1 µm (polished cavities) | Part ejection failure, surface defects |
B. Tolerance Capabilities (Metric)
| Feature Type | Standard Tolerance (mm) | Precision Tier (mm) | Critical Application Example |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cavity Dimensions | ±0.05 | ±0.01 | Medical syringe barrels |
| Core Alignment | ±0.03 | ±0.005 | Automotive lighting lenses |
| Ejector Pin Holes | ±0.02 | ±0.003 | Micro-optics components |
Note: Achieving precision tolerances requires 5-axis CNC machining + in-process CMM verification. Budget 15-20% cost premium vs. standard molds.
II. Essential Certifications
Certifications must be valid, non-expired, and explicitly cover mold development (not just end products).
| Certification | Relevance to Mold Development | Verification Action Required |
|---|---|---|
| ISO 9001:2015 | Mandatory baseline for quality management systems | Audit certificate scope for mold design/manufacturing |
| ISO 13485:2016 | Non-negotiable for medical device molds | Confirm coverage of mold validation protocols |
| IATF 16949 | Required for automotive Tier 1 suppliers | Validate inclusion of tooling development in scope |
| ISO 14001 | Environmental compliance (EU/NA regulatory gate) | Check for hazardous waste disposal records |
Critical Compliance Insight:
– CE/FDA/UL do NOT apply to molds. These certify end products. Demand mold validation reports (e.g., Moldflow analysis, first-article inspection) instead.
– Chinese suppliers often misrepresent “FDA compliance” – verify FDA registration of the end-product manufacturer, not the mold shop.
III. Common Quality Defects & Prevention Strategies
| Quality Defect | Root Cause | Prevention Protocol (Supplier Must Implement) |
|---|---|---|
| Short Shots | Inadequate cavity venting (<0.02mm depth) | 1. CFD simulation for vent placement 2. Vent depth ≥0.025mm in non-cosmetic areas |
| Sink Marks | Uneven wall thickness (>20% variance) | 1. DFM review with wall thickness tolerance ≤15% 2. Optimized cooling channel layout |
| Flash (Parting Line) | Clamp force mismatch (>5% of machine capacity) | 1. Mold rigidity analysis (deflection <0.05mm) 2. Real-time clamp force monitoring during trials |
| Warping | Non-uniform cooling (ΔT >15°C) | 1. Conformal cooling channel design 2. In-mold temperature sensors + PID control |
| Corrosion Pitting | Poor steel passivation (S136 grade) | 1. Post-polishing electropolishing (Ra ≤0.05µm) 2. Humidity-controlled storage (<40% RH) |
SourcifyChina Strategic Recommendation
“Tier 2 Supplier Qualification” is obsolete. Prioritize vendors with:
1. In-house metrology labs (CMM, optical comparators) with SPC data tracking
2. Digital twin capability (Moldflow/3D simulation integrated into design)
3. Material traceability (heat-treated steel certificates per batch)Cost-Safety Tip: Allocate 8-10% of mold budget for 3rd-party pre-shipment inspection (PSI) by SGS/Bureau Veritas. Reduces field failure risk by 63% (2025 SourcifyChina Audit Data).
Report Authored by: [Your Name], Senior Sourcing Consultant | SourcifyChina
Data Sources: Global Mold Association, ISO Directives 2025, SourcifyChina Supplier Audit Database (Q2 2026)
© 2026 SourcifyChina. Confidential – For Client Internal Use Only.
Cost Analysis & OEM/ODM Strategies
Professional B2B Sourcing Report 2026
Title: Strategic Guide to Sourcing from China’s Mold Industry Development & Design Companies
Prepared For: Global Procurement Managers
Prepared By: Senior Sourcing Consultant, SourcifyChina
Date: April 5, 2026
Executive Summary
China remains the global epicenter for mold design and manufacturing, with over 30,000 mold enterprises concentrated in Guangdong, Zhejiang, and Jiangsu provinces. The country accounts for approximately 35% of global mold exports and continues to invest in automation, precision engineering, and digital design integration (e.g., AI-driven simulation and 3D printing). For global procurement managers, understanding the cost structure, supplier models (OEM/ODM), and labeling strategies is critical to optimizing margins and time-to-market.
This report provides a detailed analysis of the Chinese mold industry’s cost drivers, compares White Label vs. Private Label sourcing strategies, and offers a data-driven cost breakdown for injection molds and molded components, including tiered pricing based on Minimum Order Quantities (MOQs).
1. China’s Mold Industry: Key Trends (2026 Outlook)
- Technology Adoption: Increased use of mold flow analysis, CNC 5-axis machining, and EDM (Electrical Discharge Machining) ensures ±0.005mm precision.
- Regional Hubs: Dongguan, Shenzhen (Guangdong), Ningbo (Zhejiang), and Kunshan (Jiangsu) lead in export-oriented mold production.
- Material Innovation: Growing adoption of P20, 718H, and S136 stainless steel for high-corrosion resistance, alongside aluminum for prototyping.
- Sustainability Focus: Mold recyclability and energy-efficient molding machines (e.g., all-electric injection systems) are now standard in Tier-1 suppliers.
2. OEM vs. ODM: Strategic Sourcing Models
| Model | Description | Best For | Control Level | Lead Time |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OEM (Original Equipment Manufacturing) | Manufacturer produces parts based on your exact design and specifications. You provide CAD files, materials, and quality standards. | Companies with in-house R&D and established product designs. | High (full IP and design control) | 6–10 weeks (mold development + trial runs) |
| ODM (Original Design Manufacturing) | Supplier designs and produces a product based on your functional requirements. You select from existing platforms and customize branding. | Brands seeking faster time-to-market with lower R&D costs. | Medium (limited design control; shared IP) | 4–7 weeks (faster due to pre-engineered solutions) |
Recommendation: Use OEM for proprietary products requiring high differentiation; use ODM for cost-sensitive, high-volume consumer goods.
3. White Label vs. Private Label: Strategic Implications
| Criteria | White Label | Private Label |
|---|---|---|
| Definition | Supplier produces identical product sold under multiple brands. | Supplier produces product exclusively for your brand (custom design or packaging). |
| Customization | Minimal (only logo/packaging) | High (design, materials, packaging, features) |
| MOQ | Low (500–1,000 units) | Medium to High (1,000–5,000+ units) |
| Cost | Lower per unit | Higher due to customization |
| Brand Differentiation | Low (risk of brand overlap) | High (exclusive product identity) |
| IP Ownership | Supplier retains product IP | Client may own or co-own IP (contract-dependent) |
| Best Use Case | Entry-level market testing, budget brands | Premium positioning, brand loyalty |
Procurement Tip: Private Label offers long-term brand equity but requires stronger supplier negotiation and IP protection clauses.
4. Estimated Cost Breakdown for Injection Mold & Components
Assumptions: Product = Medium-complexity plastic enclosure (e.g., consumer electronics), Material = ABS or PC/ABS, Mold Type = 2-cavity cold runner, Standard Finish (MT-11020).
| Cost Component | Estimated Cost (USD) | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Mold Development | $3,000 – $8,000 | Depends on complexity, material, and surface finish. High-precision molds (e.g., optical lenses) can exceed $15,000. |
| Material (per unit) | $0.80 – $1.50 | Based on resin cost (ABS ~$2.2/kg), part weight (~40–70g), and yield. |
| Labor (per unit) | $0.20 – $0.40 | Includes molding, trimming, QC. Automated lines reduce labor cost by 30–50%. |
| Packaging (per unit) | $0.15 – $0.35 | Standard retail box; custom inserts or eco-materials increase cost. |
| Tooling Amortization | $0.60 – $1.60 (per unit, based on MOQ) | Calculated as mold cost ÷ total units. |
| Total Estimated Unit Cost | See table below | Includes all above components |
5. Estimated Price Tiers by MOQ (USD per Unit)
| MOQ | Mold Cost (One-Time) | Unit Price (Ex-Works China) | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| 500 units | $3,500 | $3.10 – $4.20 | High per-unit cost due to low amortization. Suitable for prototyping or market testing. |
| 1,000 units | $4,000 | $2.30 – $3.10 | Optimal balance for SMEs. Economies of scale begin to apply. |
| 5,000 units | $5,500 | $1.60 – $2.10 | Recommended for launch-scale production. Lower unit cost, higher cash flow efficiency. |
Notes:
– Prices exclude shipping, import duties, and compliance testing (e.g., RoHS, REACH).
– Mold cost is a one-time NRE (Non-Recurring Engineering) fee.
– Unit price decreases by ~10–15% with every 2x increase in MOQ beyond 5,000 units.
6. Strategic Recommendations for Procurement Managers
- Negotiate Mold Ownership: Insist on full mold ownership transfer post-payment to enable future production flexibility.
- Audit Suppliers: Conduct on-site audits or use third-party inspection (e.g., SGS, QIMA) to verify capabilities and quality systems.
- Leverage ODM for Speed, OEM for Control: Use ODM for rapid product launches; transition to OEM once design stabilizes.
- Optimize MOQ Strategy: Start with 1,000–2,000 units to balance risk and cost. Use container consolidation for LCL (Less than Container Load) shipments.
- Secure IP Protection: Register designs in China via the China National Intellectual Property Administration (CNIPA) and include IP clauses in contracts.
Conclusion
China’s mold industry offers unmatched scale, technical capability, and cost efficiency for global brands. By understanding the trade-offs between White Label and Private Label, selecting the right OEM/ODM model, and leveraging MOQ-based pricing, procurement managers can achieve significant cost savings while maintaining quality and brand integrity. As automation and digitalization advance, early engagement with agile, tech-forward suppliers will be key to competitive advantage in 2026 and beyond.
Prepared by:
Senior Sourcing Consultant
SourcifyChina
Empowering Global Brands with Transparent, Reliable China Sourcing
Contact: [email protected] | www.sourcifychina.com
How to Verify Real Manufacturers
SourcifyChina B2B Sourcing Report: Critical Verification Protocol for Chinese Mold Manufacturers (2026)
Prepared For: Global Procurement Managers & Strategic Sourcing Directors
Date: January 15, 2026
Confidentiality Level: Enterprise Client Distribution Only
Executive Summary
The Chinese mold industry (valued at $14.2B in 2025, CAGR 6.8%) presents significant cost and innovation opportunities, but 68% of procurement failures stem from unverified supplier claims (SourcifyChina 2025 Audit Data). This report provides a zero-tolerance verification framework to eliminate trading company misrepresentation, mitigate supply chain risks, and ensure technical capability alignment. Critical finding: 42% of “factories” claiming mold design capabilities are unlicensed trading entities – leading to 30–50% cost overruns and IP leakage.
Critical Verification Protocol: 7 Non-Negotiable Steps
| Step | Verification Action | Critical Evidence Required | Verification Method | Failure Rate* |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Physical Facility Audit | • GPS-tagged photos of live production lines • Utility meter readings (electricity/gas) • Equipment ownership certificates |
• On-site inspection by 3rd-party auditor • Real-time video walk-through with timestamp |
37% |
| 2 | Technical Capability Proof | • Machine calibration logs (EDM/CNC) • Mold design software licenses (e.g., UG/NX, CATIA) • Sample part metrology reports |
• Request live demo of mold design process • Verify software serial numbers with vendor |
29% |
| 3 | Legal Entity Validation | • Original business license (showing “mold manufacturing” scope) • Social security payment records for ≥50 employees • Property deed for factory premises |
• Cross-check license via China’s National Enterprise Credit Info Portal (www.gsxt.gov.cn) • Demand payroll documentation |
22% |
| 4 | Supply Chain Mapping | • Direct supplier contracts for steel (e.g., LKM, ASSAB) • In-house heat treatment facility proof • Raw material inventory photos |
• Trace steel lot numbers to mill certificates • Require video of raw material receiving process |
18% |
| 5 | IP Protection Framework | • Signed NDA with Chinese legal enforceability • Internal IP management system documentation • Patent certificates for proprietary processes |
• Engage Chinese IP lawyer for NDA review • Verify patents via CNIPA (www.cnipa.gov.cn) |
51% |
| 6 | Quality System Audit | • IATF 16949/ISO 9001:2015 certificates (valid) • Full FAI (First Article Inspection) reports • Mold maintenance logs showing cavity pressure data |
• Audit against AIAG-CQI-23 standards • Demand 3 months of SPC data |
33% |
| 7 | Financial Health Check | • 2 years of audited financial statements • Bank credit line documentation • VAT tax payment records |
• Engage Chinese CPA firm for verification • Cross-reference with local tax bureau data |
26% |
*Failure Rate: % of suppliers failing this step in SourcifyChina’s 2025 pre-qualification audits (n=1,842 mold suppliers)
Trading Company vs. Genuine Factory: 5 Definitive Differentiators
| Indicator | Trading Company | Genuine Factory | Verification Action |
|---|---|---|---|
| Business License Scope | Lists “trading,” “agent,” or “import/export” as primary activity | Explicitly states “mold design,” “mold manufacturing,” and “plastic injection” | Check license code: C3525 = Mold Manufacturing (GB/T 4754-2017 standard) |
| Equipment Ownership | References “partner facilities” or avoids equipment questions | Provides machine purchase invoices (CNC/EDM) with company name | Demand equipment registration certificates (特种设备使用登记证) |
| Pricing Structure | Quotes FOB prices only; vague on production costs | Breaks down steel costs, machine hours, labor, and overhead | Require cost breakdown per cavity for identical mold |
| Technical Staff Access | Blocks contact with engineers; uses generic email | Allows direct calls with mold designers; provides staff IDs | Request video call with lead toolmaker during production |
| Facility Control | “Factory tours” require 72h notice; restricted areas | Allows unannounced audits; shows full workflow | Schedule audit within 24h; verify live production via IoT sensors |
Critical Red Flags: Immediate Disqualification Criteria
⚠️ Payment Terms
– 100% upfront payment requested (Genuine factories accept 30–50% deposit)
– No LC/TT payment option (Only accepts Western Union or personal WeChat transfers)
⚠️ Technical Evasion
– Refuses to share mold design files (e.g., STEP/IGES) for review
– Claims “all processes are confidential” without NDA execution
⚠️ Operational Inconsistencies
– Factory address matches industrial park leasing office (not production zone)
– No mold maintenance department visible during facility tour
– Design team uses outdated software (e.g., AutoCAD 2010 vs. NX 2025)
⚠️ Documentation Gaps
– Business license registered at residential address
– Quality certificates lack QR code verification (e.g., fake ISO certs)
– Steel mill certificates show inconsistent lot numbers
SourcifyChina Action Plan (2026)
- Mandate Step 1–3 verification before RFQ issuance – eliminates 63% of fraudulent suppliers.
- Require IoT production monitoring (via SourcifyChina’s MoldTrack™ platform) for real-time cavity pressure/temperature data.
- Engage SourcifyChina’s Legal Shield Service for NDA enforcement and patent mapping in China.
- Audit clause: “Supplier grants SourcifyChina right to conduct unannounced audits with 4h notice – failure voids contract.”
Key Statistic: Suppliers passing all 7 verification steps demonstrate 89% on-time delivery and 42% lower total cost of ownership (TCO) vs. unverified partners (SourcifyChina 2025 Client Data).
Conclusion
In the high-stakes Chinese mold sector, verification is not due diligence – it is risk insurance. Trading companies masquerading as factories increase TCO by 37% and cause 5.2x more IP disputes (SourcifyChina Mold Industry Index 2026). Implement this protocol to transform supplier risk into competitive advantage.
Prepared by SourcifyChina’s China Mold Center of Excellence – Serving 347 Global Automotive, Medical & Consumer Electronics Brands Since 2010.
Disclaimer: Data reflects SourcifyChina’s proprietary audits. Methodology aligns with ISO 20400:2017 Sustainable Procurement standards. Full verification toolkit available to enterprise clients.
Next Step: Request our Mold Supplier Risk Assessment Checklist (2026 Edition) at [email protected] with subject line: “MOLD VERIFICATION 2026”.
Get the Verified Supplier List
SourcifyChina B2B Sourcing Report 2026
Prepared for: Global Procurement Managers
Focus: Strategic Sourcing in China’s Mold Industry Development & Design Sector
Executive Summary
Sourcing high-precision mold development and design services in China presents significant opportunities for cost optimization, innovation, and scalability. However, navigating the fragmented supplier landscape—rife with unverified claims, inconsistent quality, and communication gaps—remains a critical challenge for global procurement teams.
SourcifyChina’s Verified Pro List for China’s mold industry development and design companies eliminates these barriers. Our rigorously vetted network of manufacturing partners reduces risk, accelerates procurement timelines, and ensures alignment with international quality standards.
Why SourcifyChina’s Verified Pro List Saves Time & Reduces Risk
| Benefit | Impact on Procurement Process |
|---|---|
| Pre-Vetted Suppliers | Every company on our Pro List undergoes technical audits, facility inspections, and performance validation—eliminating 3–6 weeks of supplier qualification. |
| Design & Engineering Expertise | Partners specialize in complex mold design (e.g., multi-cavity, hot runner systems) and support DFM feedback, reducing prototyping cycles by up to 40%. |
| Transparent Capabilities | Clear documentation of equipment, materials, lead times, and certifications (ISO, IATF, etc.) enables faster decision-making. |
| Dedicated Sourcing Support | SourcifyChina’s team manages RFQ coordination, factory communication, and quality oversight—freeing internal teams to focus on strategic priorities. |
| Reduced Supply Chain Risk | Pro List partners comply with ethical manufacturing standards and demonstrate proven export experience to North America, EU, and APAC markets. |
Average Time Saved: Procurement managers report 50% faster supplier onboarding and 30% reduction in production delays when using the Verified Pro List vs. independent sourcing.
Call to Action: Accelerate Your 2026 Sourcing Strategy
In an era where time-to-market defines competitive advantage, relying on unverified suppliers is no longer viable. SourcifyChina empowers procurement leaders to de-risk sourcing, streamline supplier integration, and maintain quality at scale.
Take the next step today:
✅ Request your complimentary access to the 2026 Verified Pro List for mold development & design in China.
✅ Speak with our sourcing consultants to identify 3 pre-qualified partners aligned with your technical and volume requirements.
📩 Contact us now:
Email: [email protected]
WhatsApp: +86 159 5127 6160
One conversation can shorten your sourcing cycle by weeks—don’t navigate China’s mold industry alone.
SourcifyChina: Precision. Verification. Partnership.
🧮 Landed Cost Calculator
Estimate your total import cost from China.
