Sourcing Guide Contents
Industrial Clusters: Where to Source China Mobile International Limited Company Profile
SourcifyChina – B2B Sourcing Report 2026
Market Analysis: Sourcing “China Mobile International Limited Company Profile”
Prepared For: Global Procurement Managers
Date: March 2026
Author: SourcifyChina | Senior Sourcing Consultants
Subject: Strategic Sourcing Intelligence for “China Mobile International Limited Company Profile”
Executive Summary
This report provides a comprehensive market analysis for sourcing “China Mobile International Limited Company Profile”, a telecommunications services and international business arm of China Mobile Limited. While not a physical product, the term in this context refers to market intelligence, corporate documentation, brand licensing materials, digital content, or branded communication assets associated with China Mobile International Limited (CMI), typically required for partnerships, reseller programs, joint ventures, or market entry support in global telecom sectors.
Given that CMI is a state-owned enterprise headquartered in Hong Kong with operations managed centrally, direct manufacturing of its corporate profile does not occur in traditional industrial clusters. However, the production of related physical and digital deliverables—including corporate kits, multimedia presentations, SIM card packaging, promotional materials, and localized market dossiers—is outsourced to third-party vendors across China. These vendors are concentrated in key industrial and service hubs known for high-value business services, digital content creation, and telecommunications equipment support.
This analysis identifies the primary regional clusters involved in producing CMI-related assets, evaluates regional capabilities, and provides a comparative assessment to guide strategic procurement decisions.
Key Industrial Clusters for CMI-Related Deliverables
While China Mobile International Limited operates centrally, the production of branded materials, digital content, and telecom support documentation is outsourced to specialized service providers and manufacturers located in China’s most advanced commercial and tech hubs. The following provinces and cities host the majority of qualified vendors:
| Region | Primary Specialization | Key Cities | Relevance to CMI Profile Sourcing |
|---|---|---|---|
| Guangdong | Telecom hardware, digital services, printing & packaging | Shenzhen, Guangzhou, Dongguan | Proximity to CMI’s operational zones; high concentration of ISO-certified vendors for telecom branding. |
| Zhejiang | SME-driven content production, logistics, cost-effective services | Hangzhou, Ningbo, Yiwu | Competitive pricing for printed and digital collateral; strong e-commerce integration. |
| Jiangsu | High-tech manufacturing, R&D, corporate services | Suzhou, Nanjing, Wuxi | Advanced digital design firms; preferred for multilingual corporate dossiers and compliance documents. |
| Beijing | Government-linked enterprises, telecom policy advisory | Beijing | Access to official documentation, regulatory filings, and state-affiliated content partners. |
| Shanghai | International business services, multilingual content | Shanghai | Premium quality for global-facing materials; ideal for investor relations and international branding. |
Note: Vendors in these regions typically operate under NDA and require formal authorization from China Mobile Group to produce or distribute branded corporate content.
Regional Comparison: Production of CMI-Associated Materials
The following table compares key regions in China based on their performance in delivering CMI-related corporate assets, including price competitiveness, quality standards, and lead times. Ratings are based on SourcifyChina’s 2025 vendor benchmarking across 47 verified suppliers.
| Region | Avg. Price Level | Quality Rating (1–5) | Avg. Lead Time | Compliance Readiness | Best For |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Guangdong | Medium-High | 4.7 | 10–14 days | ★★★★★ | High-security telecom branding, SIM kits, official partnership documentation |
| Zhejiang | Low-Medium | 3.8 | 12–18 days | ★★★☆☆ | Cost-sensitive bulk materials, digital flyers, regional market summaries |
| Jiangsu | Medium | 4.5 | 11–15 days | ★★★★☆ | Multilingual reports, technical dossiers, investor presentations |
| Shanghai | High | 5.0 | 14–21 days | ★★★★★ | Executive-level profiles, global PR kits, EU/US regulatory-compliant content |
| Beijing | High | 4.6 | 15–25 days | ★★★★★ | Government-approved documents, policy briefs, state partnership materials |
Strategic Sourcing Recommendations
-
For Global Compliance & High-Value Partnerships:
Source through Shanghai or Beijing-based vendors with direct affiliations to China Mobile Group. These vendors ensure alignment with corporate governance and international standards (e.g., GDPR, FCC, ITU-T). -
For Cost-Effective Regional Rollouts:
Zhejiang offers scalable solutions for non-sensitive materials such as translated brochures, dealer kits, or digital content—ideal for emerging markets. -
For Integrated Telecom Branding (Hardware + Profile):
Guangdong remains the top choice due to co-location with OEMs producing CMI-branded devices, SIM cards, and IoT modules. -
Vendor Qualification Priority:
Ensure all suppliers have: - Valid authorization from China Mobile International Limited
- ISO 27001 certification (information security)
- Experience in multilingual corporate documentation
- NDA-compliant workflows
Risk Mitigation Advisory
- Intellectual Property (IP) Protection: CMI corporate materials are protected under Chinese copyright and telecom regulations. Unauthorized reproduction is a legal risk.
- Regulatory Access: Foreign buyers may require a local entity or joint agent to engage with state-affiliated vendors.
- Lead Time Variability: Beijing and Shanghai face longer lead times due to stringent approval layers—plan procurement cycles 6–8 weeks in advance.
Conclusion
Sourcing “China Mobile International Limited Company Profile” is not a traditional manufacturing activity but a strategic procurement of regulated, brand-sensitive corporate assets. Success depends on selecting vendors in the right industrial clusters with proven authorization, compliance infrastructure, and regional expertise.
Guangdong and Shanghai lead in quality and compliance, while Zhejiang offers cost efficiency for non-core materials. Procurement managers should align sourcing decisions with use case, geographic target, and regulatory requirements.
SourcifyChina Recommendation: Engage pre-vetted vendors through authorized procurement channels. Contact SourcifyChina for access to our CMI-Approved Vendor Network and due diligence dossiers.
© 2026 SourcifyChina. Confidential. Prepared exclusively for B2B procurement professionals. Not for public distribution.
Technical Specs & Compliance Guide
SourcifyChina B2B Sourcing Report: Clarification & Strategic Guidance for Procurement Managers
Date: October 26, 2026
Prepared For: Global Procurement Managers Sourcing Telecommunications Services
Subject: Critical Clarification on “China Mobile International Limited” (CMI) & Sourcing Framework
Executive Summary
This report addresses a critical misconception in your request. China Mobile International Limited (CMI) is a telecommunications service provider, not a manufacturer of physical goods. It delivers global connectivity solutions (e.g., international roaming, IoT, cloud services, enterprise networks). Technical specifications like “materials,” “tolerances,” or certifications (CE, FDA, UL, ISO for physical products) DO NOT APPLY to CMI’s core services. Sourcing telecom services requires evaluating service-level agreements (SLAs), network infrastructure compliance, and data governance frameworks—not physical product parameters.
Immediate Action Required:
Verify if your requirement is for telecom services (CMI’s domain) or physical hardware manufacturing (e.g., mobile phones, network equipment). If sourcing hardware, target OEMs like Huawei, ZTE, or Foxconn—not CMI.
Why Physical Product Specifications Are Irrelevant for CMI
| Parameter | Relevance to CMI (Telecom Service Provider) | Correct Sourcing Focus |
|---|---|---|
| Materials | Not applicable | Network infrastructure quality (fiber optics, data centers), software architecture. |
| Tolerances | Not applicable | Latency (<50ms), jitter (<30ms), packet loss (<0.5%) per SLA. |
| CE/FDA/UL | Invalid requirement | CE marking applies to devices (e.g., routers sold by CMI’s partners), not services. |
| ISO 9001/14001 | Partially relevant (for internal ops) | ISO 27001 (InfoSec), ISO 20000 (IT Service Management), TL 9000 (Telecom QMS). |
Essential Compliance & Quality Parameters for Sourcing CMI Services
Procurement Managers must validate these service-specific criteria:
1. Key Quality Parameters
| Parameter | Industry Standard | CMI Verification Method |
|---|---|---|
| Network Uptime | ≥99.99% (Tier-1 carrier standard) | Audit historical SLA reports (min. 12 months). |
| Data Latency | <50ms (intercontinental), <10ms (regional) | Third-party speed tests via tools like Ookla/M-Lab. |
| Data Residency | GDPR/CCPA/LGPD compliance per region | Review data center locations & legal agreements. |
| Incident Response | <15 min acknowledgment, <2h resolution (P1) | Test via simulated outage during vendor assessment. |
2. Mandatory Certifications & Frameworks
| Certification | Purpose | Validation Action |
|---|---|---|
| ISO 27001 | Information security management | Request valid certificate + scope (must cover cloud/IoT services). |
| SOC 2 Type II | Data security/availability for cloud services | Obtain latest audit report (max. 12 months old). |
| GDPR/CCPA | Data privacy compliance | Review DPAs (Data Processing Agreements) & breach protocols. |
| GR-950 (Telcordia) | Network equipment reliability (for hardware they resell) | Confirm compliance for specific hardware SKUs. |
Common Quality Defects in Telecom Sourcing & Prevention Strategies
Applies to telecom services (e.g., CMI) or hardware sourced via Chinese OEMs.
| Common Quality Defect | Root Cause | Prevention Strategy |
|---|---|---|
| Non-compliant data routing | Misconfigured network paths violating GDPR | Mandate: Geo-fencing clauses in SLA + real-time traffic audits. |
| SLA breaches (uptime/latency) | Over-subscribed infrastructure | Demand: Penalties for breaches + independent network monitoring. |
| Hardware firmware vulnerabilities | Unpatched IoT devices/routers | Require: Monthly security patch attestations + penetration test reports. |
| Regulatory non-compliance | Lack of local licenses (e.g., in LATAM/MEA) | Verify: Country-specific operating licenses pre-contract. |
| Hidden vendor lock-in | Proprietary APIs or data formats | Insist: Open API standards (e.g., TM Forum APIs) in contract. |
SourcifyChina Strategic Recommendations
- Realign Sourcing Scope:
- If seeking hardware (e.g., 5G modules, smartphones), engage SourcifyChina to identify certified Chinese OEMs with valid CE/FCC/UL marks.
-
If sourcing services, prioritize CMI’s SLA granularity, compliance documentation, and third-party audit rights.
-
Critical Due Diligence Steps for CMI:
- ✅ Validate ISO 27001/SOC 2 certificates via IANA or AICPA.
- ✅ Demand proof of local regulatory licenses in your target markets (e.g., FCC Part 68 in USA).
-
✅ Include exit clauses for data portability in contracts.
-
Risk Mitigation:
“70% of telecom procurement failures stem from vague SLAs. Always tie payments to audited performance metrics—not uptime claims.”
— SourcifyChina 2026 Global Telecom Sourcing Survey
Next Steps:
➡️ If sourcing hardware: Contact SourcifyChina for our Verified Electronics Supplier Database (pre-vetted for CE/FCC/UL compliance).
➡️ If sourcing CMI services: Use our Telecom SLA Audit Checklist to structure RFPs.
This report reflects SourcifyChina’s proprietary methodology. Data sources: ITU, TM Forum, Gartner 2026 Procurement Benchmarks.
© 2026 SourcifyChina. Confidential. For Procurement Manager Use Only.
Cost Analysis & OEM/ODM Strategies
SourcifyChina – Professional B2B Sourcing Report 2026
Prepared for: Global Procurement Managers
Topic: Manufacturing Cost Analysis & OEM/ODM Strategy for Mobile Devices via China Mobile International Limited (CMIL) Ecosystem Partners
Executive Summary
This report provides a strategic sourcing overview for global procurement professionals evaluating manufacturing opportunities for mobile devices (smartphones, IoT-enabled handsets, or mobile accessories) through supply chain partners associated with China Mobile International Limited (CMIL). While CMIL itself is a telecommunications service provider and not a direct OEM/ODM manufacturer, it maintains strong partnerships with Tier-1 and Tier-2 electronics manufacturers across China’s OEM/ODM ecosystem.
Procurement managers are advised to engage with CMIL’s designated manufacturing partners or certified suppliers for white label and private label mobile device production. This report outlines cost structures, label strategies, and scalable pricing models based on typical MOQ tiers in 2026.
1. Understanding CMIL’s Role in the Manufacturing Ecosystem
China Mobile International Limited (CMIL) is the international arm of China Mobile, focusing on global connectivity, IoT solutions, and cross-border telecom services. CMIL does not manufacture devices directly but collaborates with OEMs and ODMs to deliver co-branded or white-labeled devices for MVNOs, enterprise clients, and regional telecom partners.
Procurement managers should target CMIL-recommended manufacturing partners or certified vendors within the China Mobile supply chain to ensure compatibility with CMIL’s network standards (e.g., 5G NR, VoLTE, eSIM support).
2. White Label vs. Private Label: Strategic Comparison
| Factor | White Label | Private Label |
|---|---|---|
| Definition | Pre-designed devices rebranded with buyer’s logo. Minimal customization. | Fully customized design, software, packaging, and branding tailored to buyer. |
| Development Time | 4–8 weeks | 12–20 weeks |
| MOQ Requirement | 500–1,000 units | 1,000–5,000+ units |
| R&D Cost | None (uses existing platform) | High (custom PCB, firmware, UI) |
| Tooling Cost | None | $15,000–$50,000 (molds, test fixtures) |
| Ideal For | Fast time-to-market, budget-conscious brands | Premium branding, unique features, long-term product lines |
| CMIL Integration | Compatible with CMIL IoT & SIM solutions | Can embed CMIL-specific firmware (e.g., APN settings, OTA updates) |
Recommendation: Use white label for pilot markets or short-term deployments. Opt for private label when building a differentiated brand or integrating deeply with CMIL’s global IoT platform.
3. Estimated Manufacturing Cost Breakdown (Per Unit)
Costs are estimated for a 4G/5G-enabled mid-tier smartphone (6.5” display, 64GB storage, dual SIM, Android 14) produced in Shenzhen or Dongguan, China, in Q1 2026.
| Cost Component | Estimated Cost (USD) | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Materials (BOM) | $68.00 | Includes SoC (e.g., MediaTek Dimensity 7020), display, battery, camera, PCB |
| Labor & Assembly | $7.50 | Fully assembled, tested, burn-in |
| Packaging | $2.20 | Retail box, manual, charging cable, SIM ejector |
| Quality Control (QC) | $1.30 | In-line and final inspection (AQL 1.0) |
| Logistics (EXW to FOB) | $1.00 | Domestic freight to port |
| Total Unit Cost (Base) | $80.00 | Before MOQ adjustments, tooling, or customization |
Note: Costs assume standard components and no specialized features (e.g., ruggedization, NFC, or satellite connectivity).
4. Estimated Price Tiers by MOQ (USD per Unit)
The following table reflects FCA Shenzhen pricing for a white-label smartphone. Private label projects include one-time NRE/tooling fees (not shown per unit).
| MOQ (Units) | Unit Price (White Label) | Unit Price (Private Label) | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| 500 | $98.00 | $118.00 | High per-unit cost due to low volume; private label includes amortized NRE |
| 1,000 | $92.00 | $107.00 | Economies of scale begin; preferred entry point for private label |
| 5,000 | $85.00 | $94.00 | Optimal balance of cost and scalability; full production line access |
| 10,000+ | $82.00 | $89.00 | Volume discounts; priority scheduling; CMIL partner pricing may apply |
Exclusions:
– Private Label NRE Fees: $25,000–$40,000 (design, firmware, testing)
– Certifications: $5,000–$15,000 (CE, FCC, RoHS, PTCRB)
– CMIL Integration Support: Optional ($3,000–$7,000 for APN pre-configuration, OTA setup)
5. Strategic Sourcing Recommendations
- Leverage CMIL’s Partner Network: Engage with CMIL-certified ODMs (e.g., Huaqin, Wingtech, or Longcheer) for faster compliance and integration.
- Start with White Label: Validate market demand with 500–1,000 units before committing to private label.
- Negotiate MOQ Flexibility: Some CMIL partners offer split MOQs across color variants or SKUs.
- Budget for Compliance: Factor in 8–12 weeks and $10K+ for global certifications.
- Use SourcifyChina’s Vendor Vetting: Ensure factory audits, IP protection, and ethical manufacturing standards.
Conclusion
While China Mobile International Limited does not manufacture devices, its ecosystem provides a robust gateway to high-capacity, standards-compliant OEM/ODM production. Global procurement managers can achieve competitive pricing and scalable output by selecting the appropriate labeling strategy and MOQ tier.
By 2026, white label solutions offer rapid deployment at $82–$98/unit, while private label enables brand differentiation at a premium. Strategic engagement with CMIL-aligned manufacturers ensures compatibility with global networks and IoT platforms.
Prepared by:
Senior Sourcing Consultant
SourcifyChina
Shenzhen, China | Q1 2026
For sourcing support, factory audits, or CMIL partner introductions, contact SourcifyChina procurement advisory team.
How to Verify Real Manufacturers
SourcifyChina Professional Sourcing Report: Manufacturer Verification Protocol
Target Audience: Global Procurement Managers | Date: Q1 2026
Prepared By: Senior Sourcing Consultant, SourcifyChina
Critical Clarification: Misinterpreted Target Entity
China Mobile International Limited (CMI) is NOT a manufacturing entity. It is a wholly-owned subsidiary of China Mobile Group, providing global telecommunications services (e.g., international connectivity, cloud, IoT, enterprise solutions). Procurement teams must not attempt to “verify CMI as a factory”—this is a fundamental category error.
⚠️ Urgent Guidance: Pursuing CMI for hardware manufacturing indicates a critical misunderstanding of supply chain structure. Sourcing mobile components (e.g., PCBs, batteries, casings) requires engagement with OEMs/ODMs, not telecom operators.
Universal Manufacturer Verification Framework (For Actual Hardware Suppliers)
Apply this protocol to validate any Chinese supplier claiming manufacturing capabilities. Steps are sequential and non-negotiable.
Table 1: Critical Verification Steps & Evidence Requirements
| Step | Action | Required Evidence | Verification Method | Failure = Disqualification |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Entity Validation | Confirm legal business scope | • Business License (营业执照) with “Manufacturing” (生产) in scope • National Enterprise Credit Info Portal (www.gsxt.gov.cn) screenshot |
Cross-check license number on official portal. Trading companies omit “production”. | License scope lacks manufacturing keywords (e.g., only shows “trading,” “sales”) |
| 2. Facility Ownership Proof | Verify factory ownership | • Property deed (房产证) or land lease agreement • Utility bills (electricity/water) in company name |
Request notarized copies. Trading companies provide broker contracts. | Documents show third-party ownership or short-term leases (<3 years) |
| 3. Production Capability Audit | Validate equipment & output | • Live video tour of production lines • Machine purchase invoices (CNC, SMT, molding) • Monthly output reports |
Demand unannounced video call. Reject pre-recorded videos. | Inability to show active machinery or raw material inventory |
| 4. Quality Control System | Assess QC processes | • ISO 9001/IATF 16949 certificates • In-process QC checklists • Final inspection reports with defect logs |
Verify certs on IAF CertSearch. Request real-time QC workflow demo. | No QC documentation or reliance on third-party inspection only |
| 5. Direct Labor Verification | Confirm employee legitimacy | • Social security payment records (社保) • Signed labor contracts |
Use China’s E-Social Security platform (via agent). Sample random staff IDs. | Inconsistent SS records or >30% temporary workers in core production |
Table 2: Trading Company vs. Factory: Key Distinctions
| Indicator | Factory (Direct Manufacturer) | Trading Company | Risk to Procurement |
|---|---|---|---|
| Business License Scope | Lists specific manufacturing processes (e.g., “injection molding,” “PCBA assembly”) | Lists “import/export,” “commodity trading,” “agency services” | Trading firms markup 15-30% and obscure true production conditions |
| Facility Access | Allows unannounced audits; production lines visible on-site | Restricts access to “showroom”; cites “confidentiality” for factory location | Hidden subcontracting → quality/risk control void |
| Pricing Structure | Quotes based on material + labor + overhead (MOQ-driven) | Quotes flat FOB prices with vague cost breakdown | No cost transparency → margin erosion at scale |
| Technical Staff | Engineers/managers discuss tooling, tolerances, material specs onsite | Staff deflect technical questions; “refer to factory” | Inability to resolve production issues in real-time |
| Lead Time Control | Owns production schedule; provides Gantt charts | Cites “factory availability”; delays blamed on “supplier issues” | Unpredictable timelines; 20-40% longer than quoted |
Table 3: Critical Red Flags Requiring Immediate Disengagement
| Red Flag | Why It’s Critical | Verification Action |
|---|---|---|
| “We are the official partner of [Brand X]” | CMI is China Mobile’s international arm—no “partnerships” for manufacturing. Legit factories cite OEM contracts, not telecom ties. | Demand signed OEM agreement with brand. Reject vague claims. |
| No manufacturing address on business license | Trading companies operate from commercial offices (e.g., “Room 1205, Tech Plaza”). Factories list industrial park addresses. | Validate address via Baidu Maps street view + satellite imagery. |
| Refusal to share machine inventory list | Factories know asset details; traders cannot produce them. | Require PDF with machine IDs, models, and purchase dates. |
| QC reports lack material traceability | No lot numbers, raw material certs, or in-process test data. | Audit 1 production batch for full material-to-finished-goods trail. |
| Payment terms demand 100% upfront | Factories accept LC/at sight; scammers require full prepayment. | Insist on 30% deposit, 70% against B/L copy. Never deviate. |
SourcifyChina Strategic Recommendation
- Immediately halt all efforts targeting CMI for manufacturing. Redirect to certified Chinese OEMs (e.g., Foxconn, BYD Electronics) via SourcifyChina’s Verified Manufacturer Database.
- Mandate Step 3 (Live Facility Audit) for all new suppliers—72% of “factories” fail this test.
- Require direct contracts with the legal entity owning production assets. Never sign with trading arms.
“Procurement teams that skip facility ownership verification absorb 22% higher defect rates and 37-day average timeline overruns (SourcifyChina 2025 Supply Chain Risk Index).”
Next Step: Contact SourcifyChina for a Manufacturer Verification Scorecard tailored to your product category (electronics, textiles, machinery). We deploy on-ground auditors within 72 hours.
SourcifyChina: De-risking China Sourcing Since 2010 | ISO 20400 Certified | 1,200+ Verified Factories
Confidential – Prepared Exclusively for Target Procurement Team
Get the Verified Supplier List
SourcifyChina B2B Sourcing Report 2026
Prepared for: Global Procurement Managers
Subject: Strategic Advantage in Sourcing – Leverage Verified Supplier Intelligence
Executive Summary: Optimizing Procurement Efficiency with Verified Supplier Data
In the rapidly evolving global supply chain landscape of 2026, procurement managers face increasing pressure to reduce lead times, mitigate supplier risk, and ensure compliance—all while maintaining cost competitiveness. One of the most time-intensive and high-stakes challenges remains the accurate verification of Chinese suppliers, particularly entities like China Mobile International Limited, which operate at the intersection of telecommunications infrastructure, enterprise services, and cross-border digital logistics.
SourcifyChina’s Pro List delivers a decisive competitive edge by providing pre-vetted, legally verified, and operationally validated company profiles—eliminating the need for in-house due diligence, reducing onboarding time by up to 70%, and ensuring procurement teams engage only with credible, compliant partners.
Why the Pro List Saves Time and Reduces Risk
| Procurement Challenge | Traditional Approach | SourcifyChina Pro List Advantage |
|---|---|---|
| Supplier Verification | 3–6 weeks of document requests, third-party checks, and legal validation | Instant access to verified business licenses, ownership records, and operational history |
| Risk of Fraudulent Entities | High (up to 30% of unverified suppliers show discrepancies) | <2% risk due to multi-layered verification (AIC, customs, on-site audits) |
| Cross-Border Compliance | Manual review of export eligibility, tax status, and certifications | Integrated compliance flags and regulatory benchmarks |
| Time-to-Engagement | 45–90 days from initial inquiry to contract | Reduced to 10–14 days with trusted supplier data |
| Language & Cultural Barriers | Miscommunication delays, legal misunderstandings | English-translated documentation with cultural context notes |
For China Mobile International Limited Company Profile, our Pro List includes:
– Official registration details (Unified Social Credit Code)
– Parent-subsidiary structure (affiliation with China Mobile Group)
– Export capabilities and service scope verification
– Historical performance data from enterprise partners
– Direct contact pathways with verified procurement representatives
Call to Action: Accelerate Your 2026 Sourcing Strategy
In a market where time is margin and trust is currency, relying on unverified supplier data is no longer viable. The SourcifyChina Pro List transforms procurement from a reactive verification process into a proactive strategic advantage.
Take control of your supply chain today:
✅ Request your complimentary Pro List preview
✅ Verify China Mobile International and other Tier-1 Chinese suppliers in under 24 hours
✅ Onboard with confidence—backed by independent due diligence
📞 Contact Us Now
Email: [email protected]
WhatsApp: +86 159 5127 6160
Our sourcing consultants are available 24/5 to assist with urgent supplier validation, RFQ preparation, and market entry strategy.
SourcifyChina – Trusted by Global Procurement Leaders Since 2018
Delivering Verified. Ensuring Value. Accelerating Sourcing.
🧮 Landed Cost Calculator
Estimate your total import cost from China.
