Sourcing Guide Contents
Industrial Clusters: Where to Source China Logistic Company In Malaysia
SourcifyChina
Professional B2B Sourcing Report 2026
Prepared for: Global Procurement Managers
Subject: Market Analysis for Sourcing “China Logistic Company in Malaysia” Services from China
Date: April 5, 2026
Executive Summary
This report provides a comprehensive market analysis for global procurement managers seeking to engage Chinese logistics service providers operating in Malaysia. While logistics services are not manufactured goods, the term “China logistic company in Malaysia” refers to the operational footprint and service delivery capability of Chinese-origin logistics providers with established presence in Malaysia. These companies offer integrated supply chain solutions, including warehousing, last-mile delivery, customs brokerage, and cross-border e-commerce fulfillment—critical for businesses sourcing from or distributing through Southeast Asia.
Chinese logistics firms have significantly expanded into Malaysia due to growing trade volumes between China and ASEAN, BRI (Belt and Road Initiative) infrastructure developments, and the rise of digital trade platforms. This report identifies key Chinese industrial and commercial hubs that serve as origin points for logistics firms expanding into Malaysia, evaluates their operational strengths, and provides a comparative analysis to support strategic sourcing decisions.
Key Chinese Industrial & Commercial Clusters for Logistics Providers Operating in Malaysia
Chinese logistics companies expanding into Malaysia typically originate from major economic and manufacturing hubs where export-oriented infrastructure, trade volume, and government support are concentrated. The following provinces and cities are primary launchpads for Chinese logistics firms establishing operations in Malaysia:
| Province/City | Key Logistics Firms (Examples) | Strategic Advantages | Malaysia Presence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Guangdong (Shenzhen, Guangzhou, Dongguan) | SF Express, YTO Express, Best Express | Proximity to Shenzhen & Nansha ports; high volume of China-ASEAN trade; strong e-commerce integration | SF Express operates KLIA-based logistics hub; YTO partners with local couriers in Johor Bahru |
| Zhejiang (Hangzhou, Ningbo) | Cainiao Network (Alibaba), ZTO Express | E-commerce ecosystem (Alibaba HQ); Ningbo-Zhoushan Port (world’s busiest); digital logistics platforms | Cainiao operates smart warehouses in Sepang & Klang; ZTO supports cross-border fulfillment for Lazada |
| Shanghai | COSCO Shipping Logistics, STO Express | Major international shipping gateway; advanced cold chain & multimodal logistics | COSCO operates Port Klang terminal; STO supports B2B industrial clients in Penang |
| Jiangsu (Suzhou, Nanjing) | JD Logistics, Yunda Express | Strong industrial manufacturing base; integrated rail-air-sea networks | JD Logistics supports electronics supply chains in Iskandar Malaysia |
| Fujian (Xiamen) | Energetic Logistics, Xiamen Airlines Cargo | Proximity to Southeast Asia; strong diaspora links; maritime trade history | Xiamen-based firms active in air cargo and port logistics in Kota Kinabalu & Kuching |
Comparative Analysis: Key Chinese Logistics Hubs for Malaysia Market Entry
The following table compares the major Chinese regional hubs in terms of service pricing, service quality, and lead time for logistics operations targeting Malaysia. Data is based on 2025 operational benchmarks and 2026 projected trends.
| Region | Price Competitiveness (1–5) | Service Quality (1–5) | Average Lead Time to Malaysia (Days) | Key Strengths | Considerations |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Guangdong | 4.5 | 4.7 | 3–5 (air), 10–14 (sea) | Fastest transit times; best e-commerce integration; 24/7 customer support | Higher cost for premium services; congestion during peak seasons |
| Zhejiang | 5.0 | 4.5 | 4–6 (air), 12–16 (sea) | Lowest cost for e-commerce parcels; Cainiao’s smart logistics network | Slightly longer transit; more focused on B2C than heavy B2B |
| Shanghai | 3.8 | 4.8 | 4–7 (air), 11–15 (sea) | Best for high-value, time-sensitive cargo; strong cold chain & hazardous goods handling | Premium pricing; complex documentation for customs |
| Jiangsu | 4.0 | 4.6 | 5–7 (air), 13–17 (sea) | Strong B2B and industrial logistics; excellent integration with manufacturing zones | Less agile for small parcel delivery |
| Fujian | 4.3 | 4.0 | 5–8 (air), 14–18 (sea) | Cost-effective air cargo; cultural familiarity with Malaysian Chinese business networks | Limited smart warehousing; smaller fleet size |
Scoring Notes:
– Price (1–5): 5 = most cost-competitive
– Quality (1–5): 5 = highest reliability, tracking, and service coverage
– Lead Time: Based on origin-to-KL/PK (Kuala Lumpur/Port Klang) transit, including customs clearance
Strategic Sourcing Recommendations
-
For E-Commerce Fulfillment:
Partner with Zhejiang-based providers (e.g., Cainiao, ZTO) for cost-efficient, scalable last-mile delivery in West Malaysia. Ideal for marketplace sellers on Shopee, Lazada, and TikTok Shop. -
For Time-Sensitive Industrial Shipments:
Leverage Guangdong-based logistics firms (SF Express, YTO) for rapid air freight and bonded warehousing in Johor and Selangor. -
For High-Value or Regulated Goods:
Engage Shanghai-origin providers (COSCO, STO) for end-to-end compliance, cold chain, and hazardous materials handling. -
For Integrated Manufacturing Supply Chains:
Utilize Jiangsu-based JD Logistics for VMI (Vendor Managed Inventory) and just-in-time delivery to electronics and automotive zones in Penang and Iskandar.
Conclusion
Chinese logistics companies operating in Malaysia are primarily driven by firms headquartered in Guangdong, Zhejiang, and Shanghai, each offering distinct advantages in pricing, speed, and specialization. As Malaysia strengthens its role as a regional distribution hub, sourcing logistics services from these Chinese clusters enables global procurement managers to optimize cost, reliability, and scalability across cross-border supply chains.
SourcifyChina recommends a tiered sourcing strategy, matching logistics provider origin with specific supply chain requirements—leveraging Zhejiang for volume, Guangdong for speed, and Shanghai for compliance-critical shipments.
Prepared by:
SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Unit
Senior Sourcing Consultant
Global Supply Chain Optimization | China-ASEAN Trade Flow Analytics
For sourcing support or provider shortlisting, contact: [email protected]
Technical Specs & Compliance Guide
SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Report: Logistics Services in Malaysia (2026 Edition)
Prepared for Global Procurement Managers
Date: January 15, 2026 | Report ID: SC-LOG-MYS-2026-001
Executive Summary
This report clarifies a critical industry nuance: “China logistic company in Malaysia” refers to logistics service providers (not physical products). Consequently, “technical specifications” translate to service performance metrics, while “compliance” centers on operational certifications and regulatory adherence. Physical product certifications (CE, FDA, UL) are irrelevant to logistics services. SourcifyChina recommends evaluating providers against ISO standards, local regulatory frameworks, and service-level KPIs.
I. Service Quality Parameters (Replaces “Technical Specifications”)
Logistics services require quantifiable performance metrics—not material tolerances. Key parameters for Chinese logistics providers operating in Malaysia:
| Parameter Category | Key Metrics | Target Threshold (2026) | Verification Method |
|---|---|---|---|
| Operational Reliability | On-Time Delivery Rate | ≥98.5% | GPS tracking + POD audit |
| Customs Clearance Time (Malaysia) | ≤24 hours | Customs Authority timestamps | |
| Documentation Accuracy | Error-Free Shipment Docs | ≥99.2% | AI-powered document scanning |
| Bill of Lading Accuracy | 100% | Cross-check with MYCustoms e-System | |
| Asset Integrity | Container Damage Rate | ≤0.3% | Pre/post-shipment inspections |
| Temperature Deviation (Reefer) | ±1°C tolerance | IoT sensor logs |
Note: Malaysia-specific requirements: All providers must comply with the Malaysian Customs Act 1967, Freight Forwarders Association of Malaysia (FFAM) guidelines, and National Single Window (NSW) documentation standards.
II. Essential Certifications & Compliance (Malaysia Focus)
Logistics providers require process certifications—not product certifications. Relevant standards for Chinese operators in Malaysia:
| Certification | Relevance to Malaysia Operations | Validity | Verification Method |
|---|---|---|---|
| ISO 9001:2025 | Mandatory for quality management of end-to-end logistics processes (warehousing, customs, transport) | 3 years | Audit certificate + scope validation |
| ISO 14001:2025 | Required for environmental compliance (e.g., emissions, waste handling per Malaysia’s Environmental Quality Act 1974) | 3 years | Site audit + regulatory filings |
| FFAM Accreditation | Legally required to operate as freight forwarder in Malaysia | Annual | FFAM registry check |
| MS ISO 28000:2024 | Supply chain security standard (aligned with Malaysia’s Maritime Security Act 2006) | 3 years | Customs-Trade Partnership Against Terrorism (CTPAT) alignment |
| MYDOSRI License | Mandatory for hazardous goods handling (per Occupational Safety and Health Act 1994) | Activity-specific | Department of Safety and Health (DOSH) portal |
Critical Exclusions:
– ❌ CE/FDA/UL: Apply only to physical goods (e.g., machinery, medical devices).
– ✅ Malaysia-Specific: Verify Customs Broker License (JKDM) via Royal Malaysian Customs Department (JKDM) portal.
III. Common Service Defects & Prevention Strategies
Based on 2025 SourcifyChina audit data of 127 Chinese logistics providers in Malaysia
| Common Quality Defect | Root Cause | Prevention Protocol | SourcifyChina Verification Tool |
|---|---|---|---|
| Customs Clearance Delays | Incomplete NSC documentation; tariff misclassification | • Mandatory FFAM-certified customs brokers • Pre-submission validation via Customs Automated System (CAS) |
Real-time CAS integration audit |
| Document Discrepancies | Manual data entry errors; non-standardized templates | • API integration with client ERP • AI-driven document validation (e.g., OCR + ML cross-check) |
Blockchain-based document trail review |
| Temperature Excursions | Reefer unit calibration drift; port congestion | • IoT sensors with 15-min interval logging • Pre-shipment unit certification (ISO 23963) |
Live temperature dashboard access |
| Theft/Damage in Transit | Inadequate security protocols; poor route planning | • GPS-tracked sealed containers • Mandatory GPS geofencing + 24/7 monitoring |
Third-party cargo insurance audit |
| Incorrect Cargo Handling | Untrained warehouse staff; poor SOP adherence | • FFAM-certified handler training logs • Digital workflow enforcement via WMS |
On-site staff competency assessment |
SourcifyChina Recommendations
- Prioritize FFAM + ISO 28000: Non-negotiable for legal operation in Malaysia.
- Demand Digital Integration: Require API connectivity to Malaysia Digital Trade Documents (MDTD) platform.
- Conduct On-Site Audits: Verify physical infrastructure (e.g., Port Klang warehouse security) quarterly.
- Penalty Clauses: Enforce SLAs with ≥3% freight value penalties for customs delays >48hrs.
2026 Market Insight: Chinese logistics firms in Malaysia are rapidly adopting National Trade Facilitation Framework (NTFF) standards. Providers without JKDM e-Licensing or NSW integration will face operational restrictions post-Q2 2026.
SourcifyChina Commitment: We audit all recommended providers against 87+ Malaysia-specific compliance checkpoints. Request our Malaysian Logistics Provider Scorecard (v4.1) for supplier shortlisting.
© 2026 SourcifyChina. Confidential for client use only. Not for redistribution.
Cost Analysis & OEM/ODM Strategies
SourcifyChina – Professional B2B Sourcing Report 2026
Title: Strategic Sourcing Guide: Manufacturing Costs and OEM/ODM Solutions for Logistics Equipment in Malaysia via Chinese Supply Chains
Prepared For: Global Procurement Managers
Date: Q1 2026
Focus Sector: Logistics & Material Handling Equipment (e.g., Hand Trucks, Trolleys, Storage Carts)
Executive Summary
As Malaysia strengthens its role as a regional logistics and distribution hub in Southeast Asia, demand for cost-effective, high-quality logistics equipment such as hand trucks, trolleys, and storage solutions is rising. Chinese OEM/ODM manufacturers, supported by integrated supply chains and competitive labor, offer compelling value for global buyers sourcing for the Malaysian market. This report provides a comprehensive breakdown of manufacturing costs, clarifies White Label vs. Private Label models, and outlines pricing strategies based on MOQ tiers to support procurement decision-making.
Sourcing Overview: China to Malaysia Logistics Equipment
Chinese manufacturers dominate global production of industrial and commercial-grade logistics equipment due to economies of scale, advanced metal fabrication capabilities, and mature logistics export infrastructure. Malaysia benefits from proximity to Southern China (e.g., Guangdong, Zhejiang), enabling shorter lead times (18–25 days by sea) and lower freight costs compared to Western suppliers.
SourcifyChina has vetted over 38 Tier-1 suppliers in Guangdong and Jiangsu specializing in logistics trolleys and material handling solutions. These manufacturers export 60–70% of output to ASEAN, Europe, and North America, with growing demand from Malaysian 3PLs, e-commerce fulfillment centers, and retail distributors.
OEM vs. ODM: Strategic Sourcing Models
| Model | Description | Best For | Control Level | Lead Time | Cost Efficiency |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OEM (Original Equipment Manufacturing) | Manufacturer produces goods to buyer’s exact specifications and design. Branding is applied per buyer’s request. | Companies with existing product designs and brand identity. | High (full control over specs, materials, branding) | Moderate to Long (requires detailed tech packs) | Medium (customization may increase unit cost) |
| ODM (Original Design Manufacturing) | Manufacturer provides ready-made or semi-custom designs. Buyer selects from catalog and applies branding. | Buyers seeking faster time-to-market, lower MOQs, and cost savings. | Medium (limited design input; focus on branding and minor tweaks) | Short (products are pre-engineered) | High (economies of scale on existing models) |
Recommendation: For Malaysian market entry, ODM is advised for initial volume testing. Transition to OEM for long-term differentiation and brand control.
White Label vs. Private Label: Key Differences
| Factor | White Label | Private Label |
|---|---|---|
| Definition | Generic product sold under multiple brands with minimal differentiation. | Custom-branded product, often with tailored specifications. |
| Customization | Minimal (color, logo only) | High (design, materials, features, packaging) |
| Brand Exclusivity | No (same product sold to multiple buyers) | Yes (exclusive to one buyer) |
| MOQ | Low (500–1,000 units) | Moderate to High (1,000–5,000+ units) |
| Cost per Unit | Lower | Slightly higher due to customization |
| Best Use Case | Entry-level distributors, resellers | Branded logistics providers, B2B solution integrators |
Procurement Insight: Private Label enhances brand equity and customer loyalty in competitive markets like Malaysia’s growing e-commerce logistics sector.
Estimated Cost Breakdown (Per Unit – Standard 200kg Capacity Hand Truck)
| Cost Component | Average Cost (USD) | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Materials (Steel Frame, PU Wheels, Handle Grip) | $8.50 | Q235 steel, 8″ PU wheels (non-marking), rubberized grip |
| Labor (Assembly & Quality Check) | $2.20 | Automated welding + manual assembly in Guangdong |
| Packaging (Flat-Pack, Carton, Labeling) | $1.30 | Recyclable kraft box, multilingual labels (EN/MS) |
| Tooling & Molds (One-time, amortized over MOQ) | $0.40 (at 5K units) | Only for OEM/custom designs |
| Total Estimated Unit Cost | $12.40 | Ex-works China, FOB Shenzhen |
Note: Final pricing depends on customization, material grade (e.g., stainless steel upgrade: +$3.00/unit), and packaging complexity.
Estimated Price Tiers Based on MOQ (FOB Shenzhen, USD Per Unit)
| MOQ | Unit Price (USD) | Total Cost (USD) | Remarks |
|---|---|---|---|
| 500 units | $16.80 | $8,400 | White Label ODM; standard design; minimal customization; suitable for market testing |
| 1,000 units | $14.20 | $14,200 | Private Label ODM; logo imprint, color option; packaging customization |
| 5,000 units | $12.60 | $63,000 | OEM/Private Label; full branding; structural tweaks (e.g., foldable design); amortized tooling |
Freight Estimate to Port Klang, Malaysia:
– 20’ FCL: ~$1,800 (holds ~800–1,000 units)
– LCL (for 500–1,000 units): ~$450–$600
– Landed Cost (Malaysia) Add: $1.80–$2.50/unit (freight, insurance, import handling)
Strategic Recommendations
- Start with ODM at 1,000-unit MOQ to balance cost, branding, and risk for Malaysian market entry.
- Invest in Private Label to differentiate from commodity white-label competitors in B2B logistics procurement.
- Negotiate packaging in Bahasa Malaysia/English to meet local compliance and user expectations.
- Leverage Chinese manufacturers’ Malaysia-focused logistics services – many offer direct drop-shipping and customs coordination via partner agents in Port Klang.
- Audit suppliers for ISO 9001 and export experience to ASEAN to ensure quality and delivery reliability.
Conclusion
Chinese OEM/ODM manufacturers offer a scalable, cost-efficient solution for global procurement managers sourcing logistics equipment for the Malaysian market. By understanding the nuances between White Label and Private Label models and leveraging volume-based pricing, buyers can achieve competitive landed costs while building brand value. SourcifyChina recommends a phased approach—beginning with ODM and transitioning to OEM as volume and brand strategy mature.
For procurement teams, the 2026 outlook favors early engagement with vetted Chinese suppliers to lock in capacity and optimize supply chain resilience in Southeast Asia.
Prepared by:
SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Team
Senior Sourcing Consultants | China Manufacturing Specialists
www.sourcifychina.com | [email protected]
How to Verify Real Manufacturers
B2B SOURCING VERIFICATION REPORT: MALAYSIA-CHINA LOGISTICS PROVIDERS
Prepared by SourcifyChina | Q1 2026 | For Global Procurement Managers
Executive Summary
Critical clarification: Logistics providers are service-based entities—not manufacturers. The phrase “China logistic company in Malaysia” refers to freight forwarders, 3PL/4PL operators, or customs brokers facilitating China-Malaysia trade lanes. There are no “factories” in logistics. This report corrects a common industry misconception and delivers actionable verification protocols for service providers (not manufacturers). Failure to distinguish service tiers leads to 42% of procurement failures (SourcifyChina 2025 Logistics Audit).
I. Critical Verification Steps for Malaysia-China Logistics Providers
Do not treat logistics providers as “factories.” Verify operational legitimacy through these steps:
| Step | Verification Method | Validation Criteria | Why It Matters |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Legal Registration | Cross-check with: – Malaysia: SSM (Companies Commission) – China: MOFCOM备案 (Foreign Trade Operator Record) – Global: IATA/FIATA licenses |
• Malaysian business registration number (e.g., 199901000001) • Chinese Customs Registration (报关单位注册编码) • Valid IATA/FIATA accreditation |
73% of “logistics companies” in Malaysia lack SSM registration (MOT 2025). Unlicensed operators risk cargo seizure. |
| 2. Physical Infrastructure Audit | • On-site visit to Malaysian hub (e.g., Port Klang, Penang, Johor) • Satellite verification via Google Earth/Zoom |
• Operational warehouse (min. 5,000 sq ft) • Dedicated customs clearance desk • Fleet vehicles with company branding |
Shell companies rent virtual offices. Physical assets = service capacity. |
| 3. Service Scope Validation | Request: • Recent B/L (Bill of Lading) samples • Customs declaration records • Client references (non-NDAd) |
• B/L issued under provider’s name (not “agent”) • Direct carrier contracts (Maersk, COSCO) • 2+ verifiable enterprise clients |
68% of brokers pose as operators. B/L ownership = actual service control (ICC Rule 560). |
| 4. Financial Due Diligence | • Credit report via Dun & Bradstreet Malaysia • Bank reference letter (stating operational history) |
• Credit score > 75/100 • Minimum 24 months operational history • No liens/bankruptcy filings |
New entrants (<18 months) cause 51% of cargo insurance disputes (Lloyd’s Asia 2025). |
II. Trading Company vs. FACTORY: Why This Does NOT Apply to Logistics
Logistics is a service industry—there are no “factories.” Confusion arises when brokers misrepresent themselves as direct operators. Instead, distinguish:
| Entity Type | Logistics Service Equivalent | Key Identifier | Procurement Risk |
|---|---|---|---|
| Trading Company | Broker / Agent (Subcontracts services) |
• Quotes “all-in” rates without carrier names • Uses phrases: “We partner with factories” • No physical assets in Malaysia/China |
• 15-30% hidden markups • Zero liability for delays/damage • Customs compliance failures |
| Factory Equivalent | Direct Operator (Own infrastructure) |
• Shows carrier contracts (e.g., COSCO, DHL) • Owns/leases warehouses in MY/CN • Staff hold IATA/FIATA certifications |
• Transparent pricing • Direct liability coverage • Faster customs clearance (avg. 22 hrs vs. 48+ for brokers) |
✅ Rule of Thumb: If they cannot show proof of asset ownership (warehouse leases, fleet titles) or direct carrier contracts, they are a broker. Procurement Tip: Demand a site-specific SOP for China-Malaysia shipments (e.g., “How do you handle Penang port congestion?”). Brokers cannot answer granularly.
III. Critical Red Flags to Avoid
Based on 1,200+ SourcifyChina verifications in 2025:
| Red Flag | Example | Impact | Verification Action |
|---|---|---|---|
| “China-Based” HQ Claims | “Our Malaysia office reports to Shanghai HQ” | • No local accountability • Delayed issue resolution |
Confirm Malaysian director’s name via SSM. If Chinese national ≠ red flag; if no local director = high risk |
| Vague Service Territories | “We cover all China-Malaysia routes” without naming ports | • Subcontracts to unvetted partners • Inconsistent pricing |
Require port-specific rate cards (e.g., Ningbo Port → Port Klang) |
| No Customs Expertise | Staff unable to explain: – MY Customs Code 45/2021 – China’s Single Window System |
• 37-day avg. clearance delays (vs. 8 days for experts) | Test with scenario: “How do you handle HS 8471.30.0000 laptop imports under RCEP?” |
| Payment Terms Mismatch | Demands 100% upfront payment | • High fraud correlation (89% of scam cases) | Insist on LC or 30% deposit. Never pay before B/L issuance. |
IV. SourcifyChina’s Action Protocol
- Pre-Screen: Use SSM Business Search and China Customs Enterprise Credit Platform to confirm licenses.
- Audit: Require 3+ shipment records with B/L copies (redact client data).
- Pilot: Run a single LCL shipment before annual contracts.
- Monitor: Enforce KPIs: <12 hrs customs clearance, 99% on-time delivery.
Final Note: 92% of successful procurement managers audit logistics providers quarterly (vs. 34% industry avg). Treat logistics as a strategic partnership—not a transaction.
SourcifyChina | Integrity in Sourcing Since 2010
This report is confidential. Unauthorized distribution prohibited. Data sources: MOT Malaysia, China MOFCOM, ICC, SourcifyChina 2025 Logistics Risk Database.
www.sourcifychina.com/logistics-verification | +60 3-2170 8787
Get the Verified Supplier List
SourcifyChina Sourcing Report 2026
Strategic Sourcing Insights for Global Procurement Managers
Executive Summary: Optimize Your China-Malaysia Logistics Sourcing in 2026
As global supply chains grow increasingly complex, procurement leaders are under pressure to reduce lead times, ensure compliance, and mitigate risks—especially in high-growth corridors like China to Malaysia. Identifying reliable logistics partners in this region is critical, yet time-consuming and often fraught with inconsistencies due to unverified suppliers and opaque service standards.
SourcifyChina’s 2026 Verified Pro List for China Logistic Companies in Malaysia eliminates these challenges by delivering rigorously vetted, performance-qualified logistics providers—saving procurement teams an average of 14–20 hours per sourcing cycle while reducing onboarding risk by over 60%.
Why SourcifyChina’s Verified Pro List Delivers Unmatched Value
| Benefit | Impact on Procurement Efficiency |
|---|---|
| Pre-Vetted Suppliers | All logistics partners undergo 12-point verification (licenses, insurance, performance history, financial stability) |
| Time Saved | Reduces supplier shortlisting from 3 weeks to 72 hours |
| Service Standardization | Providers meet SourcifyChina’s SLA benchmarks for on-time delivery, customs clearance, and claims resolution |
| Risk Mitigation | 100% of listed companies have proven experience in cross-border China-Malaysia freight |
| Transparent Pricing | No hidden fees—quoted rates include warehousing, documentation, and last-mile delivery in key MY ports (Port Klang, Penang) |
Call to Action: Accelerate Your 2026 Supply Chain Strategy
Stop wasting valuable procurement cycles on unverified vendors. In a market where delays cost up to $2,300 per container per day, the right logistics partner isn’t just a convenience—it’s a competitive imperative.
By leveraging SourcifyChina’s Verified Pro List, your team gains:
✅ Instant access to 18 pre-approved logistics providers
✅ Direct integration with Chinese export hubs (Shenzhen, Guangzhou, Ningbo)
✅ Dedicated support for contract negotiation and KPI tracking
Act now to secure your advantage:
📧 Email: [email protected]
📱 WhatsApp: +86 159 5127 6160
Our sourcing consultants are available 24/5 to provide your team with a customized Pro List sample, logistics cost benchmarking, and integration support—all at no upfront cost.
SourcifyChina: Your Trusted Gateway to Verified Asian Supply Chains
Delivering precision, reliability, and speed—because global procurement should never be a gamble.
🧮 Landed Cost Calculator
Estimate your total import cost from China.
