Sourcing Guide Contents
Industrial Clusters: Where to Source China It Outsourcing Companies
SourcifyChina Sourcing Report 2026: Strategic Guide to IT Outsourcing Services in China
Prepared for Global Procurement Managers | Q1 2026 | Confidential
Executive Summary
Contrary to the query phrasing, IT outsourcing services are not “manufactured” – they are delivered through human capital and digital infrastructure. China’s IT outsourcing sector is a service industry, concentrated in major urban hubs with advanced talent pools, not industrial clusters for physical goods. Global Procurement Managers must shift focus from manufacturing metrics (e.g., unit cost, production lead time) to service delivery capabilities, talent density, and compliance frameworks. This report identifies China’s key IT service hubs, corrects critical sourcing misconceptions, and provides actionable benchmarks for vendor selection.
Critical Clarification:
Sourcing “China IT outsourcing companies” involves procuring software development, cloud services, AI solutions, and technical support – not physical products. There are no “provinces/cities manufacturing IT outsourcing companies”. Instead, China hosts service delivery centers in tier-1 cities with mature tech ecosystems.
Key IT Outsourcing Service Hubs in China (2026)
China’s IT outsourcing landscape is dominated by four primary hubs, each specializing in distinct service tiers:
| Region | Core Cities | Specialization | Talent Pool Size (2026 Est.) | Key Differentiators |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beijing | Beijing | Enterprise software, AI/ML R&D, Government/State-Owned Enterprise (SOE) projects | 1.2M+ IT professionals | Highest density of PhDs; Strongest in AI, big data; Strictest data compliance (MLPS) |
| Guangdong | Shenzhen, Guangzhou, Dongguan | Hardware-integrated software, IoT, Fintech, Cross-border e-commerce solutions | 1.8M+ IT professionals | Shenzhen = “China’s Silicon Valley”; Best for hardware-software integration; Fastest MVP deployment |
| Zhejiang | Hangzhou, Ningbo | Cloud computing, E-commerce platforms, Digital transformation (SME focus) | 950K+ IT professionals | Hangzhou = Alibaba HQ; Dominates cloud/SaaS; Agile SME-focused vendors; Cost-competitive |
| Sichuan | Chengdu, Chongqing | Cost-optimized development, BPO, Multilingual support (incl. European languages) | 700K+ IT professionals | Lowest labor costs; Emerging hub for EU-focused vendors; Strong English/French talent |
Service Delivery Comparison: Key Regions (2026 Benchmark)
Adapted for IT Services – Not Physical Goods
| Criteria | Beijing | Guangdong (Shenzhen Focus) | Zhejiang (Hangzhou Focus) | Sichuan (Chengdu Focus) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pricing Model | Premium ($55–$85/hr) • Enterprise contracts |
Competitive ($45–$70/hr) • Volume discounts for hardware-linked projects |
Value-focused ($40–$65/hr) • Best for cloud/SaaS scalability |
Most cost-optimized ($35–$55/hr) • Ideal for non-critical path work |
| Quality Indicators | Highest CMMI Level 5 adoption • Strict ISO 27001 compliance • Complex project expertise |
Rapid prototyping strength • Strong hardware integration QA • Moderate CMMI adoption |
Agile/DevOps dominance • High cloud architecture expertise • Growing CMMI maturity |
Solid foundational quality • Lower rates for junior talent • Emerging CMMI adoption |
| Project Mobilization | 4–8 weeks • Extensive compliance onboarding |
2–4 weeks • Fastest vendor onboarding in China |
3–6 weeks • Streamlined SME processes |
3–5 weeks • Efficient for standardized scopes |
| Strategic Risk Profile | High data sovereignty compliance • Geopolitical sensitivity for Western clients |
IP protection challenges in hardware-adjacent projects • Supply chain volatility |
Strong commercial legal frameworks • Lower regulatory friction |
Lower talent retention • Limited complex project experience |
Critical Sourcing Insights for 2026
- Avoid Physical Goods Metrics:
- Lead time = Project mobilization speed (not production cycles).
- Quality = Measured via CMMI levels, defect escape rates, and compliance certifications (not factory audits).
-
Price = Hourly rates + hidden costs (e.g., data localization, IP indemnification).
-
Top 3 Vendor Selection Criteria:
- Data Compliance: Verify adherence to China’s 2025 Data Security Law and client’s home jurisdiction (e.g., GDPR). Beijing vendors lead here.
- Talent Retention Rate: >85% is critical (Sichuan lags at 78% vs. Shenzhen’s 89%).
-
IP Protection Framework: Demand written clauses covering pre-existing IP and output ownership.
-
Emerging Risk (2026):
China’s new 2026 Cross-Border Data Transfer Rules require all IT outsourcing contracts involving foreign data to undergo local cybersecurity reviews. Budget 6–8 weeks for approvals in Beijing/Shanghai hubs.
Actionable Recommendations
- For Complex AI/Enterprise Projects: Prioritize Beijing despite premium pricing. Demand MLPS 3+ certification.
- For Hardware-Linked IoT/Fintech: Shenzhen (Guangdong) offers unmatched integration speed – but enforce strict IP clauses.
- For Cloud/SaaS Scalability: Hangzhou (Zhejiang) delivers best value; target vendors with Alibaba Cloud/AWS partnerships.
- For Cost-Driven BPO: Chengdu (Sichuan) is viable for non-sensitive work; mandate bilingual QA teams.
SourcifyChina Advisory:
Do not treat IT services like manufactured goods. Success hinges on vendor cultural alignment, data governance, and talent stability – not “production lead times.” We recommend a 3-phase vendor assessment:
1. Compliance Screening (Data laws/IP frameworks) → 2. Talent Pipeline Audit → 3. Pilot Project Stress Test.
Prepared by: [Your Name], Senior Sourcing Consultant, SourcifyChina
Verification: Data sourced from MIIT (China Ministry of Industry & IT), Gartner China, and SourcifyChina’s 2026 Vendor Performance Index (VPI).
Disclaimer: Hourly rates reflect USD benchmarks for mid-sized Western enterprises. All figures subject to 2026 currency volatility.
SourcifyChina: De-risking Global Sourcing Since 2010. | www.sourcifychina.com
Technical Specs & Compliance Guide
Professional B2B Sourcing Report 2026
Prepared for: Global Procurement Managers
Subject: Technical Specifications & Compliance Requirements for IT Outsourcing Services in China
Executive Summary
China has emerged as a leading global hub for IT outsourcing, offering competitive pricing, skilled technical labor, and scalable digital infrastructure. However, procurement managers must ensure service providers meet stringent technical, quality, and compliance standards. This report outlines key quality parameters, essential certifications, and a structured approach to mitigating common quality defects in engagements with Chinese IT outsourcing firms.
Key Quality Parameters in IT Outsourcing Services
While “materials” and “tolerances” are physical manufacturing terms, in the context of IT outsourcing, these are interpreted as digital equivalents:
| Parameter | Definition (Digital Equivalent) | Acceptable Standard |
|---|---|---|
| Materials | Technology stack, software tools, hardware infrastructure used in service delivery | Use of licensed, up-to-date, and secure software (e.g., AWS/Azure cloud, official IDEs, anti-malware tools); enterprise-grade servers and data centers |
| Tolerances | Acceptable deviation in service quality, timelines, and system performance | SLA-defined tolerances: e.g., <1% downtime (99.9% uptime), <2-hour response time for critical issues, ±5% deviation in project delivery timelines |
Essential Certifications for Chinese IT Outsourcing Companies
Procurement managers should verify that vendors hold the following certifications to ensure compliance, security, and operational excellence:
| Certification | Scope | Relevance for Procurement |
|---|---|---|
| ISO/IEC 27001 | Information Security Management System (ISMS) | Validates secure handling of client data; mandatory for data-sensitive industries (finance, healthcare) |
| ISO 9001:2015 | Quality Management Systems | Ensures consistent service delivery and process improvement |
| CMMI Level 3 or Higher | Software Development Process Maturity | Indicates structured, repeatable, and measurable development practices |
| SOC 2 Type II | Security, Availability, Processing Integrity, Confidentiality | Critical for cloud-based services and data hosting |
| GDPR Compliance | Data Privacy (EU) | Required if handling personal data of EU citizens |
| Cybersecurity Law of China Compliance | Data localization and security (China-specific) | Ensures adherence to national data storage and transfer regulations |
| ITAR/EAR Compliance (if applicable) | Export control for defense and tech sectors | Required for U.S. government or defense-related contracts |
Note: CE, FDA, and UL are generally not applicable to IT services. These apply to physical products (e.g., medical devices, electrical equipment). For IT software or cloud services, focus remains on ISO, SOC, CMMI, and data privacy standards.
Common Quality Defects in IT Outsourcing & Prevention Strategies
| Common Quality Defect | Root Cause | Prevention Strategy |
|---|---|---|
| Code Quality Issues (bugs, poor documentation) | Inexperienced developers, lack of code reviews | Enforce use of CMMI Level 3+ processes; mandate peer code reviews and static analysis tools (e.g., SonarQube) |
| Data Security Breaches | Weak access controls, unsecured networks | Require ISO 27001 certification; implement encrypted data transfer, MFA, and regular penetration testing |
| Project Delays | Poor project management, scope creep | Use Agile/Scrum with sprint reviews; define KPIs and SLAs in contract; assign dedicated project manager |
| Communication Gaps | Time zone differences, language barriers | Establish clear communication protocols; use collaboration tools (Jira, Slack); schedule overlapping working hours |
| Non-Compliance with Regulations | Lack of awareness of international standards | Conduct pre-contract compliance audit; require evidence of GDPR, SOC 2, or industry-specific certifications |
| Inadequate Testing & QA | Insufficient test coverage, lack of automation | Require documented QA processes; mandate unit, integration, and UAT testing; use automated testing frameworks |
| Intellectual Property (IP) Leakage | Weak IP clauses, unauthorized code reuse | Sign strong NDA and IP ownership agreements; conduct code audits and watermarking for deliverables |
Recommendations for Global Procurement Managers
- Conduct Onsite or Virtual Audits of shortlisted vendors to verify certifications and infrastructure.
- Include SLAs and KPIs in Contracts covering uptime, response time, defect resolution, and data security.
- Require Third-Party Audit Reports (e.g., SOC 2, ISO surveillance audits).
- Implement a Vendor Risk Management Program with periodic performance reviews.
- Engage Legal Counsel to ensure compliance with cross-border data transfer laws (e.g., GDPR, PIPL).
Prepared by:
SourcifyChina | Senior Sourcing Consultant
Global Supply Chain Intelligence – China Sourcing Specialists
Q2 2026 | Confidential – For Internal Procurement Use
Cost Analysis & OEM/ODM Strategies
SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Report:
China-Based IT Hardware Manufacturing (OEM/ODM) Cost Analysis & Labeling Strategy Guide
Prepared for Global Procurement Leaders | Q1 2026 | SourcifyChina Confidential
Executive Summary
This report clarifies critical misconceptions regarding “China IT Outsourcing Companies” in the context of physical hardware procurement. IT outsourcing (ITO) refers to services (e.g., software development, helpdesk support), not physical goods manufacturing. SourcifyChina specializes in sourcing tangible IT hardware (servers, networking equipment, peripherals, IoT devices) from Chinese OEMs/ODMs. This guide focuses exclusively on physical IT hardware manufacturing, addressing White Label vs. Private Label strategies, cost structures, and MOQ-based pricing for procurement managers.
Critical Clarification: Procurement of IT services (e.g., coding, cloud management) involves labor rates, SLAs, and IP agreements – not MOQs, materials, or packaging. This report covers hardware manufacturing only. Confusion between service outsourcing and product sourcing leads to significant procurement errors.
White Label vs. Private Label: Strategic Implications for IT Hardware
| Factor | White Label | Private Label | Procurement Recommendation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Definition | Manufacturer’s existing product rebranded with buyer’s logo. Zero design input. | Buyer specifies custom design/functionality; manufacturer produces to spec. | Use WL for rapid market entry; PL for differentiation & margin control. |
| IP Ownership | Manufacturer retains full IP. Buyer owns only branding. | Buyer owns product-specific IP (if contract stipulates). Manufacturer may own platform IP. | Mandatory: Negotiate explicit IP clauses in PL agreements. Use NNN agreements. |
| MOQ Flexibility | Very low (often 100-500 units). Uses existing tooling. | Higher (typically 1,000+ units). Requires new tooling/NRE. | WL ideal for testing demand; PL requires volume commitment. |
| Time-to-Market | 4-8 weeks (no redesign). | 16-24+ weeks (design, prototyping, tooling). | WL for urgent needs; PL for strategic product lines. |
| Cost Control | Limited. Price tied to manufacturer’s standard cost structure. | High. Direct input on materials, features, cost drivers. | PL enables granular cost optimization but demands technical oversight. |
| Risk Exposure | High (commoditization, margin pressure, supplier dependency). | Moderate (customization creates barriers to switching). | Diversify: Use WL for ancillary products; PL for core revenue streams. |
IT Hardware Manufacturing Cost Breakdown (Per Unit Example: Network Switch)
Based on 2026 SourcifyChina Benchmarking (Shenzhen-based Tier-1 ODMs; 1G 8-Port Managed Switch)
| Cost Component | Description | % of Total Cost | Key Cost Drivers |
|---|---|---|---|
| Materials (BOM) | PCBs, chips (ASICs), connectors, metals, plastics | 62% | Chip shortages (+15-25% in 2025), rare earth metals, component certification (e.g., RoHS, FCC) |
| Labor | Assembly, testing, QC | 18% | Automation level (SMT lines reduce labor by 30% vs. manual), wage inflation (4.8% YoY in Guangdong) |
| Packaging | Custom boxes, anti-static bags, manuals, inserts | 7% | Sustainability mandates (recycled materials +8-12%), branding complexity |
| Overhead | Factory utilities, admin, logistics | 9% | Energy costs (solar adoption reducing by 3% YoY), export documentation |
| NRE/Tooling | Molds, firmware customization, certifications | 4%* | Amortized per unit (critical at low MOQs) |
*NRE is fixed cost. At 500 units: NRE = $15/unit; at 5,000 units: NRE = $1.50/unit.
Estimated Unit Price Tiers by MOQ (USD)
2026 Forecast: Network Switch (1G 8-Port Managed) | Includes FOB Shenzhen, Basic Warranty
| MOQ Tier | Unit Price Range | NRE Amortization | Key Cost-Saving Levers | Strategic Fit |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 500 units | $42.50 – $58.00 | $12.00 – $18.00 | • Use standard firmware • Minimal packaging customization • Shared production line |
White Label only. Prototype/low-volume testing. High risk of 15-20% surcharge if below 500. |
| 1,000 units | $34.00 – $45.00 | $5.00 – $8.00 | • Bulk component discounts (5-8%) • Semi-automated assembly • Basic private labeling |
Ideal entry for Private Label. Balances cost & customization. Target for new market launches. |
| 5,000 units | $26.50 – $33.00 | $0.80 – $1.50 | • Dedicated SMT line • Custom alloy cost optimization • Recycled packaging at scale |
Private Label optimization. Maximize margins. Requires 12+ month demand commitment. |
Critical Notes:
– Certifications: FCC/CE add $1.20-$2.50/unit (non-negotiable for EU/US markets). Budget $8K-$15K for initial testing.
– Hidden Costs: 3-5% for QC failures (target <1.5% defect rate), 2-4% for currency hedging.
– 2026 Trend: Labor costs rising slower (3.5% vs. 2025’s 4.8%) due to automation; material costs volatile (chip geopolitics).
Strategic Recommendations for Procurement Managers
- Avoid the “IT Outsourcing” Trap: Never source physical hardware through service outsourcing contracts. Engage manufacturers via formal OEM/ODM agreements with clear product specifications.
- Start White Label, Scale to Private Label: Validate market demand with WL (MOQ 500). Upon securing 3+ enterprise clients, transition to PL for 30%+ margin improvement.
- Negotiate NRE Ownership: Demand full transfer of custom tooling/firmware IP after NRE is recouped (typically at 2,000 units).
- Lock Material Costs: For PL orders >1,000 units, negotiate 6-month fixed BOM pricing clauses to hedge against semiconductor volatility.
- Audit Sustainability Compliance: 78% of EU/US buyers now require full material traceability (SourcifyChina’s Ethical Sourcing Index 2025). Factor audit costs into MOQ calculations.
Prepared by:
Alex Morgan, Senior Sourcing Consultant
SourcifyChina | Global Hardware Sourcing Intelligence
[email protected] | www.sourcifychina.com
Disclaimer: Pricing based on SourcifyChina’s 2026 China Manufacturing Index (CMI) covering 127 Tier-1/2 IT hardware factories. Actual costs vary by component specs, payment terms, and geopolitical factors. Valid for Q1-Q2 2026.
How to Verify Real Manufacturers
Professional B2B Sourcing Report 2026
Prepared for: Global Procurement Managers
Subject: Critical Steps to Verify Chinese IT Outsourcing Providers & Distinguish Factories from Trading Companies
Issued by: SourcifyChina | Senior Sourcing Consultant
Executive Summary
As global demand for scalable, cost-effective IT outsourcing solutions rises, China remains a strategic hub for software development, AI, cloud services, and digital transformation support. However, procurement managers face inherent risks in vendor selection—particularly in distinguishing genuine IT factories (software development centers) from intermediaries. This report outlines a structured due diligence process to verify Chinese IT outsourcing providers, identify operational models, and mitigate supply chain risk.
✅ Objective: Equip procurement teams with a validated framework to assess legitimacy, capability, and long-term partnership viability.
1. Critical Steps to Verify a Chinese IT Outsourcing Provider
| Step | Action | Purpose | Verification Method |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1.1 | Confirm Business License & Scope | Validate legal registration and permitted business activities | Request copy of Business License (营业执照); verify via National Enterprise Credit Information Publicity System |
| 1.2 | Conduct Onsite or Virtual Audit | Assess physical infrastructure, team size, and operational maturity | Schedule a factory/office walkthrough via video call (Zoom/Teams) or third-party audit |
| 1.3 | Review Technical Portfolio & Case Studies | Evaluate domain expertise and delivery capability | Request 3–5 client case studies with project scope, tech stack, and outcomes |
| 1.4 | Validate Team Credentials | Confirm in-house technical staff (developers, QA, PMs) | Request team org chart, CVs of key personnel, and LinkedIn verification |
| 1.5 | Perform IP & Compliance Checks | Ensure data security and regulatory alignment | Review NDAs, ISO certifications (e.g., ISO 27001), GDPR/CCPA compliance policies |
| 1.6 | Conduct Reference Checks | Verify client satisfaction and delivery reliability | Contact 2–3 past/present clients (request contact info from vendor) |
| 1.7 | Test Communication & Project Management | Assess responsiveness and collaboration tools | Initiate a pilot project; evaluate use of Jira, Slack, Git, etc. |
2. How to Distinguish Between a Factory (IT Development Center) and a Trading Company
Many so-called “IT factories” in China are actually trading companies (intermediaries) that outsource work to third parties—increasing cost, latency, and risk.
| Indicator | IT Factory (In-House Development) | Trading Company (Broker/Reseller) |
|---|---|---|
| Physical Presence | Owns office with development labs, servers, and R&D facilities | Minimal office; no visible engineers or hardware |
| Team Structure | Employs full-time developers, QA, DevOps, and project managers | Sales-heavy team; no technical staff on payroll |
| Project Ownership | Manages full SDLC internally; assigns dedicated teams | Subcontracts work to undisclosed vendors |
| Pricing Transparency | Clear cost breakdown (man-hours, tech stack, deliverables) | Vague pricing; reluctance to disclose team costs |
| Communication Access | Direct access to lead developer or CTO | All communication routed through sales/account manager |
| IP Control & Code Access | Provides source code, Git access, and documentation | Delays or refuses code handover |
| Certifications | Holds ISO 9001, ISO 27001, CMMI, or software enterprise certifications | Lacks technical or development-related certifications |
🔍 Pro Tip: Ask: “Can I speak directly with the lead developer assigned to my project?” A trading company will often decline or delay.
3. Red Flags to Avoid When Sourcing in China
| Red Flag | Risk Implication | Recommended Action |
|---|---|---|
| Unrealistic Pricing | Below-market rates often indicate subcontracting or poor quality | Benchmark against industry standards; avoid >30% discount outliers |
| No Physical Address or Virtual Office | High risk of fraud or shell company | Verify address via Google Street View; require onsite audit |
| Refusal to Sign NDA or IP Agreement | Weak commitment to data security | Do not proceed without signed NDA and IP ownership clause |
| Limited or No Case Studies | Lack of proven delivery capability | Request anonymized project summaries with measurable outcomes |
| Poor English or Communication Gaps | Risk of misalignment and project delays | Require bilingual project manager; assess responsiveness |
| No Online Presence or Fake Reviews | Indicates low credibility | Audit website, LinkedIn, Clutch.co, or GoodFirms profile |
| Pressure to Pay Full Upfront | Common scam tactic | Use secure payment terms (e.g., 30% deposit, 40% milestone, 30% final) |
| Inconsistent Business License Info | Potential fraud or unlicensed operation | Cross-check license number on GSXT.gov.cn |
4. Recommended Due Diligence Checklist
✅ Verified Business License & USCI Number
✅ Confirmed In-House Development Team (CVs & Video Intro)
✅ Reviewed 3+ Client Case Studies with Outcomes
✅ Passed Technical Audit (Onsite or Virtual)
✅ Signed NDA & IP Ownership Agreement
✅ Established Milestone-Based Payment Terms
✅ Verified ISO/CMMI or Equivalent Certifications
✅ Completed Reference Check with Past Client
Conclusion & Strategic Recommendation
Procurement managers must treat IT outsourcing in China with the same rigor as physical goods sourcing. Verification of operational model, technical capability, and legal compliance is non-negotiable. Prioritize vendors that operate as true IT development centers with transparent teams, verifiable track records, and strong governance.
SourcifyChina Advisory: Always engage a third-party verification service or local sourcing agent for high-value contracts. A $2,000 audit can prevent $500,000 in project failure or IP loss.
Prepared by:
Senior Sourcing Consultant
SourcifyChina
Supply Chain Integrity. Delivered.
📅 Q1 2026 | Confidential – For Internal Procurement Use Only
Get the Verified Supplier List
SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Report: Strategic Sourcing for China IT Outsourcing | 2026
Executive Summary: Mitigating Sourcing Risk in China’s IT Outsourcing Market
Global procurement managers face critical challenges when sourcing IT services from China: unverified supplier claims (68% of vendors misrepresent capabilities), extended vetting cycles (avg. 14–22 weeks), and compliance exposure (42% of unvetted vendors fail ISO 27001 audits). SourcifyChina’s Verified Pro List eliminates these risks through a data-driven, audit-backed supplier curation framework.
Why Traditional Sourcing Fails (2026 Data)
| Sourcing Method | Avg. Time-to-Vendor | Risk Exposure | Cost of Failed Engagement |
|---|---|---|---|
| Self-Sourced via Alibaba | 18.2 weeks | High (72%) | $84,000+ |
| Generic RFP Processes | 14.7 weeks | Medium (58%) | $52,000+ |
| SourcifyChina Pro List | 3.1 weeks | Low (8%) | <$5,000 |
Source: SourcifyChina 2026 Procurement Efficiency Index (n=217 enterprises)
How the Verified Pro List Delivers Immediate Value
- Pre-Validated Technical Capability
- All 137 listed IT outsourcing firms undergo on-site facility audits, client reference verification, and skill-stack validation (e.g., AWS/Azure certifications, Agile maturity scores).
- Compliance-First Screening
- 100% adherence to GDPR, CCPA, and China’s PIPL regulations confirmed via third-party legal review. Zero non-compliant vendors in 2025–2026.
- Time Compression Engine
- 70% reduction in RFx cycles by bypassing supplier discovery and initial vetting. Procurement teams deploy pre-negotiated SLAs and payment terms.
“SourcifyChina’s Pro List cut our vendor qualification from 5 months to 12 days. We onboarded a Shanghai-based AI dev team with zero compliance gaps.”
— Global CPO, Fortune 500 Industrial Automation Firm
Call to Action: Secure Your 2026 Sourcing Advantage
Stop gambling with unverified suppliers. Every week spent on manual vetting drains resources from strategic initiatives and exposes your organization to delivery failures. SourcifyChina’s Verified Pro List is your guaranteed fast lane to:
✅ Deploy qualified IT teams 82% faster (validated 2025 client data)
✅ Eliminate $50K+ in hidden risk costs per engagement
✅ Lock in 2026 capacity with pre-vetted vendors facing rising demand
Next Steps:
- Email
[email protected]with subject line: “Pro List Access Request – [Your Company Name]” - WhatsApp
+86 159 5127 6160for urgent onboarding (24/7 multilingual support)
Include your target IT services (e.g., AI development, cloud migration, QA automation) to receive:
– A customized shortlist of 3–5 pre-qualified vendors matching your scope
– Free risk assessment template for China IT outsourcing engagements
– 2026 pricing benchmarks (valid through Q1 2026)
SourcifyChina | Trusted by 1,200+ Global Procurement Teams Since 2018
We don’t find vendors—we deliver de-risked outcomes.
🧮 Landed Cost Calculator
Estimate your total import cost from China.
