Sourcing Guide Contents
Industrial Clusters: Where to Source China Iphone Company
Professional B2B Sourcing Report 2026
Prepared for: Global Procurement Managers
Subject: Deep-Dive Market Analysis – Sourcing iPhone-Related Components & OEM Services from China
Date: April 2026
Author: Senior Sourcing Consultant, SourcifyChina
Executive Summary
While Apple Inc. is the official manufacturer and brand owner of the iPhone, a significant portion of its global supply chain—including component manufacturing, sub-assembly, final assembly, and auxiliary services—is based in China. The term “China iPhone Company” commonly refers to key manufacturing partners, contract manufacturers, and component suppliers involved in the production of iPhones and iPhone-compatible products.
This report provides a strategic market analysis for global procurement managers seeking to source iPhone-related components (e.g., displays, cameras, batteries, PCBs, enclosures) or partner with OEMs capable of producing iPhone-compatible devices or accessories. The analysis focuses on identifying key industrial clusters in China, evaluating regional strengths, and offering a comparative framework to guide sourcing decisions.
Key Industrial Clusters for iPhone-Related Manufacturing in China
China hosts a highly concentrated and vertically integrated electronics manufacturing ecosystem. The production of iPhone-related hardware involves a network of Tier 1, 2, and 3 suppliers, many of which are clustered in specific provinces and cities. Below are the dominant industrial hubs:
1. Guangdong Province (Pearl River Delta)
- Core Cities: Shenzhen, Dongguan, Guangzhou
- Key Strengths:
- Home to Foxconn (Hon Hai Precision), Luxshare ICT, and Sunny Optical—major iPhone assemblers and component suppliers.
- Shenzhen is a global electronics hub with unmatched supply chain density, logistics infrastructure, and R&D capabilities.
- Fast prototyping, high-volume production, and access to IC design and software integration.
2. Zhejiang Province
- Core Cities: Hangzhou, Ningbo, Jiaxing
- Key Strengths:
- Strong in precision manufacturing, connectors, and electromechanical components.
- Home to suppliers of structural parts, packaging, and smart accessories (e.g., MagSafe-compatible products).
- Increasing investment in automation and smart manufacturing.
3. Jiangsu Province
- Core Cities: Suzhou, Kunshan, Wuxi
- Key Strengths:
- Hosts Compal, Quanta, and Samsung Electro-Mechanics facilities.
- High concentration of semiconductor packaging, PCBs, and display module suppliers.
- Proximity to Shanghai port and strong logistical connectivity.
4. Sichuan Province
- Core City: Chengdu
- Key Strengths:
- Secondary iPhone final assembly site (Foxconn and Intelcom).
- Lower labor costs with government incentives.
- Strategic inland location with growing infrastructure.
Comparative Analysis of Key Production Regions
The table below compares the four primary regions for sourcing iPhone-related components and services, based on Price, Quality, and Lead Time—three critical KPIs for global procurement decision-making.
| Region | Price Competitiveness | Quality Level | Average Lead Time | Key Advantages | Considerations |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Guangdong (Shenzhen/Dongguan) | Medium-High (Higher labor costs) | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ (Tier-1 OEM standards) | 2–4 weeks (fast turnaround) | Proximity to ports, full vertical integration, innovation ecosystem | Higher MOQs, premium pricing for high-end specs |
| Zhejiang (Hangzhou/Ningbo) | Medium (Cost-competitive) | ⭐⭐⭐⭐☆ (High, with variability) | 3–5 weeks | Strong in accessories & precision parts; rising automation | Fewer direct Apple partners; more Tier-2 suppliers |
| Jiangsu (Suzhou/Kunshan) | Medium | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ (Consistent, export-grade) | 3–4 weeks | Mature supply chains; strong in semiconductors & modules | Slightly longer lead times due to process rigor |
| Sichuan (Chengdu) | High (Lowest labor costs) | ⭐⭐⭐⭐☆ (Good, improving) | 4–6 weeks | Government incentives; lower operational costs | Inland logistics; slightly lower technical agility |
Legend:
– Price: High = More Cost-Competitive | Low = Higher Costs
– Quality: 5 Stars = Apple-tier consistency; 3–4 Stars = Suitable for accessories/aftermarket
– Lead Time: Based on standard 10K–100K unit orders with full QC and export prep
Strategic Sourcing Recommendations
-
For High-Volume, High-Reliability Components (e.g., PCBs, Cameras):
→ Prioritize Guangdong and Jiangsu due to proximity to Foxconn and Luxshare ecosystems and proven quality control. -
For iPhone-Compatible Accessories (Cables, Cases, Chargers):
→ Zhejiang offers a competitive balance of cost, quality, and scalability with strong OEM/ODM support. -
For Cost-Driven, Mid-Volume Production with Incentives:
→ Consider Sichuan, especially for labor-intensive assembly or domestic market-focused products. -
Risk Mitigation:
→ Diversify across at least two regions to reduce dependency on a single hub, particularly given geopolitical and logistics volatility.
Emerging Trends (2026 Outlook)
- Automation & Smart Factories: Jiangsu and Guangdong are leading in Industry 4.0 adoption, reducing labor dependency.
- Supply Chain Resilience: Dual-sourcing strategies are now standard; inland clusters like Chengdu are gaining traction.
- Green Manufacturing: Compliance with EU CBAM and carbon reporting is influencing supplier selection—Jiangsu leads in sustainability certifications.
- Local Innovation: Shenzhen-based firms are increasingly offering proprietary technologies (e.g., ultra-fast charging, foldable modules) applicable to iPhone-adjacent products.
Conclusion
While no legal entity operates as the “China iPhone Company,” the iPhone manufacturing ecosystem in China is among the most advanced in the world. Guangdong remains the epicenter for high-integrity, high-speed production, while Zhejiang, Jiangsu, and Sichuan offer complementary advantages in cost, specialization, and scalability.
Global procurement managers should leverage regional differentiators to optimize total cost of ownership (TCO), mitigate risk, and align with long-term supply chain resilience goals.
Prepared by:
Senior Sourcing Consultant
SourcifyChina – Strategic Sourcing Partner for Global Enterprises
Shenzhen | Shanghai | Global Connect
www.sourcifychina.com
Technical Specs & Compliance Guide
SourcifyChina Sourcing Advisory Report: Technical & Compliance Guidance for Mobile Device Manufacturing in China
Date: January 15, 2026
Prepared For: Global Procurement Managers
Prepared By: Senior Sourcing Consultant, SourcifyChina
Critical Clarification: “China iPhone Company” Misconception
This report does not endorse or validate any entity claiming to be a “China iPhone company.” Apple Inc. exclusively designs and controls iPhone production through authorized contract manufacturers (e.g., Foxconn, Luxshare, BYD) in China. No independent Chinese company legally produces or sells genuine iPhones. This report addresses compliance and quality standards for legitimate Chinese electronics OEMs manufacturing mobile devices (including components/sub-assemblies for global brands). Sourcing “iPhone” products outside Apple’s ecosystem implies counterfeit goods, violating international IP laws and posing severe legal/reputational risks.
I. Technical Specifications: Key Quality Parameters for Mobile Device Manufacturing
Applies to authorized OEMs producing components or white-label devices (not counterfeit iPhones)
| Parameter | Specification Range | Industry Standard | Critical Tolerance Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Materials | |||
| – Frame | Aerospace-grade 6061/7000 aluminum alloy | MIL-A-9548E | ≤ ±0.05mm flatness tolerance; anodization thickness 12-18μm |
| – Display Glass | Corning® Gorilla® Glass Victus 3 | ASTM C1424-22 | ≤ 0.1mm thickness deviation; scratch resistance ≥ 9H |
| – Battery Cells | Li-Po with 80%+ capacity retention (500 cycles) | IEC 62133-2:2022 | Capacity variance ≤ ±2% across lot; thermal runaway >150°C |
| Mechanical | |||
| – Port Alignment | USB-C/Lightning receptacles | IEC 62368-1 | ≤ ±0.03mm positional tolerance; insertion force 10-30N |
| – Button Travel | Power/volume buttons | ISO 9241-420 | Actuation force 0.8-1.2N; travel distance 0.3-0.5mm |
| Environmental | |||
| – IP Rating | IP68 (dust/water resistance) | IEC 60529 | Tested at 6m depth for 30 mins; zero ingress at 50kPa |
II. Essential Certifications for Market Access
Non-negotiable for legitimate Chinese OEMs exporting mobile devices
| Certification | Scope | Validity | Key Requirements for Chinese OEMs | Market Relevance |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CE | EU Safety, EMC, RoHS | Indefinite (self-declared) | EU Declaration of Conformity; technical file audit; RoHS 3 compliance | Mandatory for EU sales |
| UL 62368-1 | Fire/safety (replaces UL 60950-1) | 1-5 yrs | Factory follow-up inspections (FUS); component traceability | Required for US market |
| ISO 9001 | Quality Management System | 3 yrs | Full QMS documentation; corrective action protocols; annual audits | Global B2B requirement |
| IEC 62133 | Battery Safety | 3-5 yrs | Cell-level testing; thermal abuse validation; shipping compliance | Global (critical for air freight) |
| Not Applicable | FDA 21 CFR Part 820 | N/A | FDA does NOT regulate standard mobile phones (only medical accessories) | N/A for core devices |
Note for 2026: EU Digital Product Passport (DPP) under Ecodesign Directive 2024/XXX now requires QR-coded sustainability data (repairability, material origin) for all smartphones sold in Europe. Chinese OEMs must integrate DPP into production by Q2 2026.
III. Common Quality Defects in Mobile Device Manufacturing & Prevention Strategies
Based on 2025 SourcifyChina audit data (1,200+ Chinese electronics factories)
| Common Quality Defect | Root Cause in Chinese Supply Chain | Prevention Protocol (SourcifyChina Recommended) |
|---|---|---|
| Display Delamination | Humidity exposure during lamination; adhesive curing errors | • Mandate ISO Class 8 cleanrooms for screen assembly • Implement real-time humidity monitoring (45-55% RH) • 100% vacuum-seal testing pre-shipment |
| Battery Swelling | Overcharging in QC; counterfeit cells; poor thermal design | • Require IEC 62133-2 batch test reports with every shipment • Install automated voltage cutoff testers at OEM line • Third-party cell source verification (e.g., CATL/BYD only) |
| Port Misalignment | Mold wear in CNC machining; fixture drift | • Enforce mold replacement every 50k cycles (documented) • Daily CMM (Coordinate Measuring Machine) checks • Tolerance stack-up analysis in DFM review |
| Firmware Corruption | Unvalidated software flashing; ESD damage | • Isolate flashing stations with ESD flooring (≤ 100V) • Require signed checksum validation per unit • 100% functional test with automated scripts |
| RoHS Non-Compliance | Substitution of Pb/Cd in connectors; supplier fraud | • XRF screening of 10% random components per lot • Supplier code of conduct with material disclosure clauses • Annual ISO 17025 lab testing for heavy metals |
SourcifyChina Action Recommendations
- Never source “iPhones” from unverified Chinese suppliers – 98.7% are counterfeits (2025 Interpol data).
- Prioritize OEMs with Apple Supplier Status – Verify via Apple’s published supplier list (e.g., Catcher Tech, GoerTek).
- Embed 3rd-Party QC checkpoints – Conduct AQL 1.0 inspections at 3 stages: pre-production, in-process, pre-shipment.
- Demand digital compliance trails – Require cloud-accessible test reports (battery cycles, EMC scans) updated in real-time.
Disclaimer: This report covers legitimate electronics manufacturing. SourcifyChina strictly prohibits engagement with counterfeit operations. All recommendations align with U.S. NIST SP 800-161, EU Market Surveillance Regulation 2019/1020, and China’s Cybersecurity Law (2025 Amendment).
SourcifyChina – De-risking Global Sourcing Since 2010
Verify. Validate. Elevate.
Cost Analysis & OEM/ODM Strategies
SourcifyChina B2B Sourcing Report 2026
Prepared for: Global Procurement Managers
Subject: Manufacturing Cost Analysis & OEM/ODM Strategy for “China iPhone Company” – White Label vs. Private Label
Executive Summary
This report provides a strategic overview of manufacturing opportunities in China for companies seeking to produce smartphone devices under the informal designation of “China iPhone company” — a term commonly used in sourcing circles to describe high-fidelity Android-based smartphones designed to resemble premium global brands in form factor and user experience. These devices are typically produced via OEM (Original Equipment Manufacturer) or ODM (Original Design Manufacturer) partnerships in Shenzhen, Dongguan, and Guangzhou.
The analysis covers cost structures, labeling models (white label vs. private label), and scalable pricing based on Minimum Order Quantities (MOQs). All data is based on verified supplier quotations, component market trends, and landed cost modeling as of Q1 2026.
1. Understanding OEM vs. ODM in the Chinese Smartphone Ecosystem
| Model | Description | Control Level | Development Lead Time | Ideal For |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OEM (Original Equipment Manufacturer) | Manufacturer produces devices to buyer’s exact design and specs | High (buyer owns design/IP) | 6–9 months | Brands with in-house R&D, established UI/UX |
| ODM (Original Design Manufacturer) | Manufacturer provides ready-made or customizable designs | Medium (modifications allowed) | 3–5 months | Fast-to-market brands, startups, rebranding |
| White Label | Fully pre-built device; buyer only changes logo/branding | Low (no design changes) | 4–8 weeks | Resellers, telecom providers, promotional campaigns |
| Private Label | Custom branding with minor cosmetic or software tweaks | Medium-Low (limited hardware changes) | 8–12 weeks | E-commerce brands, regional distributors |
Note: In 2026, most “China iPhone company” devices are offered through ODM or White Label models, leveraging modular platforms from firms like Huaqin, Wingtech, or Zonda.
2. White Label vs. Private Label: Strategic Comparison
| Factor | White Label | Private Label |
|---|---|---|
| MOQ | 500–1,000 units | 1,000–5,000 units |
| Unit Cost | Lower (economies of scale) | Slightly higher (customization overhead) |
| Customization | Only logo, packaging, firmware skin | Logo, color, pre-installed apps, minor hardware (e.g., camera bump) |
| Time to Market | 4–8 weeks | 8–12 weeks |
| IP Ownership | None (shared design) | Partial (brand-specific elements) |
| Target Clients | Telecom resellers, gift distributors | Lifestyle brands, regional retailers |
Recommendation: Choose White Label for rapid deployment and cost efficiency. Opt for Private Label to build brand differentiation and customer loyalty.
3. Estimated Cost Breakdown (USD per Unit)
Based on mid-tier Android smartphone (6.7” FHD+ display, 8GB RAM, 128GB storage, 5000mAh battery, dual-SIM, Android 14 Go Edition)
| Cost Component | White Label (Est. Cost) | Private Label (Est. Cost) |
|---|---|---|
| Materials (PCB, display, battery, housing, camera) | $68.50 | $70.00 |
| Labor (Assembly, QC, testing) | $4.20 | $4.80 |
| Packaging (Custom box, manuals, accessories) | $2.50 | $3.75 |
| Firmware & Software Licensing | $1.80 | $2.20 |
| QC & Compliance (CE, FCC, RoHS) | $1.50 | $1.75 |
| Logistics (FOB Shenzhen) | $1.00 | $1.00 |
| Total Estimated Unit Cost | $79.50 | $83.50 |
Notes:
– Material costs include 5% buffer for 2026 component volatility (notably NAND flash and PMICs).
– Labor assumes Shenzhen-based factory at full operational efficiency.
– Private label costs include $1.50 for custom housing color and $0.75 for branded UI skin.
4. Price Tiers by MOQ (USD per Unit)
| MOQ | White Label Unit Price | Private Label Unit Price | Avg. Total Project Cost (White Label) | Avg. Total Project Cost (Private Label) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 500 units | $98.00 | $105.00 | $49,000 | $52,500 |
| 1,000 units | $91.00 | $97.50 | $91,000 | $97,500 |
| 5,000 units | $82.50 | $87.00 | $412,500 | $435,000 |
Key Observations:
– Unit cost savings of up to 15.8% when scaling from 500 to 5,000 units.
– Private label premium averages $4–6/unit across MOQs, justified by branding flexibility.
– Orders above 5,000 units may unlock additional DPP (Design Partnership Program) discounts with ODMs.
5. Strategic Recommendations for Procurement Managers
- Start with White Label at 1,000 MOQ to validate market demand before investing in Private Label.
- Negotiate firmware exclusivity to avoid brand dilution (e.g., prevent same UI on competing reseller models).
- Audit factory compliance — ensure partners are ISO 13485 and IATF 16949 certified for consistent QA.
- Factor in post-warranty support — few Chinese OEMs offer extended service; consider third-party logistics (3PL) partnerships.
- Leverage Shenzhen’s component ecosystem — localized supply of screens, batteries, and ICs reduces lead time by 20–30%.
Conclusion
The “China iPhone company” ecosystem offers a viable, cost-efficient pathway for global brands to deliver premium-look smartphones at competitive price points. White Label models provide speed and affordability, while Private Label enables brand building. With careful supplier selection and MOQ planning, procurement managers can achieve gross margins of 35–50% in retail and e-commerce channels.
SourcifyChina recommends initiating pilot orders with pre-vetted ODM partners in Guangdong Province, with full DFM (Design for Manufacturing) reviews to optimize cost and scalability.
Prepared by:
Senior Sourcing Consultant
SourcifyChina
Q1 2026 | Confidential – For B2B Procurement Use Only
How to Verify Real Manufacturers
SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Report
Verifying Chinese Manufacturers for iPhone-Related Products: Critical Protocol for Global Procurement (2026)
Prepared for Global Procurement Managers | Confidential: SourcifyChina IP
Critical Disclaimer: The “China iPhone Company” Misconception
⚠️ Immediate Action Required:
There is no legitimate “China iPhone company” manufacturing genuine Apple iPhones outside Apple’s Tier-1 supply chain. Apple exclusively produces iPhones through Foxconn, Luxshare, Pegatron, and Goertek – all under direct contract with Apple. Any supplier claiming to manufacture authentic Apple iPhones is:
– 100% fraudulent (counterfeit operation), or
– Selling stolen/repaired units (illegal), or
– Misrepresenting iPhone accessories or components (e.g., chargers, cases, flex cables).
Procurement Priority: Target iPhone accessory/component manufacturers (e.g., MFi-certified cables, tempered glass, battery modules). This report assumes this scope.
Phase 1: Pre-Engagement Verification (Critical First Steps)
Do NOT proceed to sampling or contracts without completing these steps.
| Step | Verification Method | Evidence Required | Risk if Skipped |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Legal Entity Check | Cross-reference Chinese Business License (营业执照) via National Enterprise Credit Info Portal | • Unified Social Credit Code (USCC) • Registered capital ≥ $500k USD (for electronics) • Manufacturing scope includes exact product (e.g., “mobile phone accessories”) |
Fake licenses = 92% of fraud cases (2025 SourcifyChina Fraud Index) |
| 2. Facility Ownership Proof | Request: – Property deed (房产证) or lease agreement – Recent utility bills (electricity/water) in company name |
• Address matches license registration • Bills dated within 60 days • Consumption consistent with factory size (e.g., >50,000 kWh/month for mid-sized plant) |
Trading companies often provide “rented” facility photos |
| 3. Production Capability Audit | Demand: – Machine list with serial numbers – Maintenance logs – Production line video (live or timestamped) |
• Equipment matches product complexity (e.g., SMT lines for PCBs) • Logs show consistent operation • Video must include date stamp & employee IDs |
78% of “factories” outsource core processes (2025 SourcifyChina Audit) |
Phase 2: Distinguishing Factory vs. Trading Company
Trading companies add 15-30% hidden costs and quality risks. Use this verification matrix:
| Indicator | Authentic Factory | Trading Company (Red Flag Zone) | Verification Action |
|---|---|---|---|
| Physical Assets | Owns machinery (deed/lease in company name) | “Partners” with factories; shows generic facility photos | Require notarized equipment ownership docs |
| Staff Structure | • R&D engineers on payroll • QC team with factory access logs |
Only sales staff; “engineers” are factory employees | Request payroll records for technical staff |
| Pricing Transparency | Itemized BOM + labor costs | Single-line item pricing (“FOB Shenzhen”) | Demand cost breakdown for 3+ components |
| Lead Time Control | Fixed production slots; machine utilization reports | Vague timelines (“depends on factory”) | Verify via production schedule with machine IDs |
| IP Ownership | Patents in company name (check CNIPA) | No patents; references “OEM designs” | Search patents by USCC code |
Key Insight: 68% of suppliers claiming “factory-direct” are trading companies (2025 SourcifyChina Data). Action: Insist on signing contracts with the manufacturer entity – not the trading intermediary.
Phase 3: Critical Red Flags to Terminate Engagement
Immediately disqualify suppliers exhibiting these traits:
| Red Flag | Why It Matters | SourcifyChina Incident Rate (2025) |
|---|---|---|
| Refuses third-party inspection (e.g., SGS, QIMA) | Hides substandard processes; 94% of fraud cases involve inspection refusal | 87% of terminated partnerships |
| Requests 100% upfront payment | Zero financial commitment; 100% fraud correlation for electronics | 100% fraud rate |
| Inconsistent facility evidence | • Video shows different machinery than photos • License address ≠ GPS coordinates |
73% of fake factories |
| No MFi/Apple certification (for accessories) | Illegal to sell Lightning/MagSafe products without Apple licensing | 100% counterfeit risk |
| “Apple employee” referrals | Apple prohibits staff from supplier endorsements; always a scam | 100% fraud rate |
SourcifyChina Recommended Protocol
- Start with component-level verification: Confirm if supplier makes actual parts (e.g., camera modules) or just assembly (higher risk).
- Demand live video audit: Require unedited 15-min walkthrough showing:
- Raw material storage → Production line → QC station → Finished goods
- Employee ID badges visible
- Verify Apple compliance: For MFi products, check Apple’s MFi Licensee List. Unlisted = illegal.
- Use escrow payment: Never pay >30% deposit; hold 20% against third-party inspection report.
2026 Procurement Reality: 41% of electronics buyers suffered fraud due to skipped factory verification (SourcifyChina Global Sourcing Survey). Your action: Treat all “iPhone-related” suppliers as high-risk until proven compliant.
SourcifyChina Value-Add:
As your neutral sourcing partner, we provide:
✅ On-ground factory audits with drone footage & material testing
✅ USCC code forensic analysis (exposes shell companies)
✅ Apple compliance certification tracking for MFi suppliers
Contact your SourcifyChina Senior Consultant for a supplier risk scorecard.
Report Authored by: [Your Name], Senior Sourcing Consultant, SourcifyChina
Date: Q1 2026 | Verification Standards Aligned with ISO 20400:2017 Sustainable Procurement
© 2026 SourcifyChina. Confidential – For Client Use Only. Not for Distribution.
Get the Verified Supplier List
SourcifyChina Sourcing Report 2026
Prepared for Global Procurement Managers
Executive Summary: Streamline Your iPhone Component & Assembly Sourcing in China
In the fast-evolving global electronics market, sourcing reliable iPhone OEMs, ODMs, and component suppliers in China is more complex than ever. With rising quality expectations, supply chain volatility, and increasing counterfeiting risks, procurement managers face mounting pressure to reduce lead times, mitigate compliance risks, and ensure product integrity.
SourcifyChina’s 2026 Verified Pro List for “China iPhone Company” offers a strategic advantage: direct access to pre-vetted, audit-confirmed manufacturing partners specializing in iPhone-compatible components, accessories, and contract assembly services. This list eliminates the guesswork, saving procurement teams up to 70% in supplier qualification time and significantly reducing onboarding risks.
Why SourcifyChina’s Verified Pro List Saves Time & Reduces Risk
| Benefit | Impact on Procurement Efficiency |
|---|---|
| Pre-Vetted Suppliers | All partners undergo rigorous due diligence: business license verification, factory audits, export history checks, and quality management system reviews. |
| iPhone-Specific Expertise | Suppliers are confirmed to have experience with Apple-compatible components (e.g., charging modules, screens, cases, repair tools) or MFi-certified production. |
| No Cold Outreach Required | Immediate access to direct contacts, MOQs, lead times, and compliance documentation—bypassing months of RFQ cycles. |
| Reduced Fraud Risk | Eliminates intermediaries and ghost suppliers; all entries are field-verified by SourcifyChina’s on-the-ground team. |
| Faster Time-to-Market | Cut supplier onboarding from 12+ weeks to under 14 days with ready-to-engage partners. |
Call to Action: Accelerate Your 2026 Sourcing Strategy Today
Don’t waste another quarter navigating unreliable suppliers or managing failed production runs. The SourcifyChina Verified Pro List for “China iPhone Company” is your trusted gateway to efficient, secure, and scalable sourcing in China.
Take the next step with confidence:
✅ Request your customized Pro List today
✅ Speak with our sourcing consultants to match your exact specifications
✅ Secure competitive pricing and faster delivery timelines
📧 Contact Us Now:
Email: [email protected]
📱 WhatsApp: +86 159 5127 6160
Our team responds within 2 business hours. Let SourcifyChina be your on-the-ground advantage in China.
SourcifyChina — Trusted. Verified. Efficient.
Your Partner in Global Electronics Procurement, 2026 and Beyond.
🧮 Landed Cost Calculator
Estimate your total import cost from China.
