Sourcing Guide Contents
Industrial Clusters: Where to Source China Inspection Company Ltd
SourcifyChina B2B Sourcing Report 2026
Prepared for Global Procurement Managers
Subject: Market Analysis for Sourcing “China Inspection Company Ltd” – Clarification and Strategic Sourcing Guidance
Executive Summary
This report provides a comprehensive market analysis for sourcing services associated with the entity “China Inspection Company Ltd” from China. It is essential to clarify at the outset that “China Inspection Company Ltd” is not a manufactured product, but rather a service-based entity—specifically, a third-party inspection, testing, certification, or quality assurance provider.
As such, this report reframes the objective to support global procurement managers in sourcing reliable inspection services from China-based providers, with a focus on identifying key industrial and service clusters where such inspection companies operate most effectively. The analysis includes a comparative assessment of major regional hubs in China known for high-capacity, professional inspection and compliance services.
Clarification: “China Inspection Company Ltd” – A Service, Not a Product
- Nature of Entity: “China Inspection Company Ltd” (or similarly named entities) typically refers to a third-party inspection firm offering services such as pre-shipment inspection (PSI), factory audit, product testing, and compliance verification.
- Core Services Include:
- Quality control (AQL sampling)
- Factory capability audits
- Lab testing (e.g., for textiles, electronics, toys)
- Social compliance (e.g., BSCI, SMETA)
- Origin verification and cargo loading supervision
These services are geographically distributed across China’s major manufacturing and export hubs, where proximity to factories reduces travel time and cost for inspection teams.
Key Industrial & Service Clusters for Inspection Companies in China
Inspection firms establish regional offices or partner networks in provinces with high manufacturing density to ensure rapid deployment. The following regions are dominant in hosting and delivering inspection services:
| Region | Major Cities | Dominant Industries | Inspection Service Density | Strategic Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Guangdong | Guangzhou, Shenzhen, Dongguan | Electronics, Consumer Goods, Plastics, Textiles, Hardware | Very High | Proximity to OEMs, strong logistics, English-speaking staff |
| Zhejiang | Ningbo, Hangzhou, Yiwu, Wenzhou | Light Manufacturing, Textiles, Home Goods, Fasteners, E-commerce | High | Cost-effective labor, strong SME base, dense supplier networks |
| Jiangsu | Suzhou, Nanjing, Wuxi | Machinery, Automotive, High-Tech, Industrial Equipment | High | Proximity to Shanghai, skilled workforce, advanced infrastructure |
| Shanghai | Shanghai (Municipality) | Cross-sector HQs, R&D, High-Value Goods, Compliance Hub | Very High | International standards, multi-language auditors, certification expertise |
| Fujian | Xiamen, Fuzhou | Footwear, Ceramics, Building Materials, Garments | Medium | Niche in export-oriented light industry, lower costs |
| Shandong | Qingdao, Jinan | Agriculture, Machinery, Chemicals, Textiles | Medium | Strong port access, growing inspection presence |
Note: Inspection companies do not “manufacture” goods; instead, they operate service hubs in these regions to support global buyers sourcing from local factories.
Regional Comparison: Inspection Service Performance (2026 Benchmark)
The following table evaluates key regions in China based on service delivery metrics relevant to procurement managers sourcing inspection services.
| Region | Price (Cost per Inspection) | Quality (Accuracy, Compliance Standards) | Lead Time (Scheduling to Execution) | Best For |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Guangdong | $$–$$$ (Moderate to High) | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ (Excellent – aligned with ISO, AQL, EU/US standards) | 1–2 days (Fastest response) | Electronics, high-volume consumer goods, urgent inspections |
| Zhejiang | $–$$ (Low to Moderate) | ⭐⭐⭐⭐ (Very Good – strong for SMEs, e-commerce) | 2–3 days | Cost-sensitive buyers, Alibaba/Temu suppliers, home goods |
| Jiangsu | $$ (Moderate) | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ (Excellent – advanced manufacturing focus) | 2 days | Industrial equipment, automotive parts, precision goods |
| Shanghai | $$$ (High) | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ (Premium – multilingual, global compliance) | 1–3 days (depends on scope) | High-risk categories, retail compliance (e.g., Walmart, Target) |
| Fujian | $–$$ (Low) | ⭐⭐⭐ (Good – variable due to smaller firms) | 3–5 days | Footwear, ceramics, lower-risk categories |
| Shandong | $$ (Moderate) | ⭐⭐⭐⭐ (Very Good – strong in agri & bulk) | 2–4 days | Bulk commodities, food packaging, machinery |
Price Key: $ = Low (<¥800), $$ = Moderate (¥800–¥1,500), $$$ = High (>¥1,500)
Quality Scale: Based on auditor certification (e.g., CQA, ISO 17020), reporting accuracy, and client satisfaction (SourcifyChina 2026 Survey Data)
Lead Time: Average time from booking to on-site inspection
Strategic Recommendations for Global Procurement Managers
-
Prioritize Guangdong & Shanghai for High-Compliance Needs
Use inspection firms based in Guangdong or Shanghai when sourcing electronics, children’s products, or goods bound for regulated markets (EU, US, Canada). These regions offer auditors certified in ASTM, EN, CPSIA, and REACH. -
Optimize Cost with Zhejiang-Based Providers
For low-risk, high-volume goods (e.g., promotional items, home décor), leverage Zhejiang’s cost-efficient inspection networks. Many firms here specialize in e-commerce fulfillment QC. -
Leverage Multi-Regional Networks
Engage inspection companies with nationwide coverage (e.g., SGS, Bureau Veritas, TÜV, or reputable Chinese firms like CCIC or QIMA) to ensure consistency across provinces. -
Verify Auditor Credentials
Ensure inspection providers employ internationally certified auditors and use digital reporting platforms (e.g., real-time photo logs, GPS-tagged visits). -
Avoid “Name-Only” Entities
“China Inspection Company Ltd” may be a generic or unregistered name. Always validate the legal entity, accreditation (e.g., CNAS, ILAC), and client references before engagement.
Conclusion
While “China Inspection Company Ltd” is not a physical product to be sourced, the strategic location of inspection service providers in China is critical to supply chain integrity. Guangdong and Shanghai lead in quality and speed, while Zhejiang and Shandong offer cost-effective solutions for mid-tier compliance needs.
Global procurement managers should align inspection sourcing strategy with regional strengths, ensuring that quality control operations are both efficient and compliant with international standards.
Prepared by:
Senior Sourcing Consultant
SourcifyChina | Global Supply Chain Intelligence
April 2026 | Confidential – For Client Use Only
Technical Specs & Compliance Guide
SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Report: Service Provider Evaluation Guide
Report Reference: SC-SP-2026-001
Date: January 15, 2026
Prepared For: Global Procurement Managers (GPMs) Sourcing Inspection Services in China
Subject: Technical & Compliance Framework for China Inspection Company Ltd (Service Provider Context)
Critical Clarification
China Inspection Company Ltd (CICL) is a third-party inspection service provider, not a manufacturer. This report details service delivery specifications and compliance requirements for engaging CICL (or equivalent firms), not product technical parameters. Procurement managers must evaluate the inspection service itself, not physical goods.
I. Service Technical Specifications & Quality Parameters
CICL’s value lies in its ability to verify your product specifications. Key service parameters define their operational rigor:
| Parameter Category | Key Quality Parameters | SourcifyChina Recommendation |
|---|---|---|
| Materials Verification | • Traceability of material test reports (MTRs) • Raw material composition analysis (e.g., XRF, spectroscopy) • Batch/lot consistency checks |
Require CICL to use ISO 17025-accredited labs for material testing. Validate MTR authenticity via blockchain ledger integration (mandatory for 2026 contracts). |
| Dimensional Tolerances | • Calibrated tool precision (e.g., CMM, micrometers ±0.001mm) • Statistical Process Control (SPC) data review capability • Geometric Dimensioning & Tolerancing (GD&T) expertise |
Audit CICL’s calibration certificates quarterly. Mandate ASME Y14.5-2023 compliance for GD&T inspections. Require SPC data validation for high-volume orders. |
| Process Adherence | • AQL sampling plan execution (per ISO 2859-1:2023) • Real-time defect classification protocols • Pre-production vs. during-production audit differentiation |
Insist on dual inspector verification for Critical-to-Quality (CTQ) features. Demand AI-powered image recognition for defect documentation (standard in 2026). |
II. Essential Certifications & Compliance Requirements
CICL must hold these credentials to ensure legally defensible inspection results:
| Certification | Relevance to Procurement Managers | 2026 Compliance Threshold |
|---|---|---|
| ISO/IEC 17020:2023 | Non-negotiable for inspection bodies. Validates impartiality, competence, and consistent methodology. Replaces older ISO 17020:2012. | Mandatory accreditation by a ILAC-MRA signatory body (e.g., CNAS, UKAS). Verify via IAF CertSearch. |
| ISO 9001:2025 | Confirms robust internal quality management for CICL’s operations (e.g., report accuracy, data security). | Must include AI-driven anomaly detection in QMS per 2025 updates. Audit trails required for all corrective actions. |
| ANSI/ASQ Z1.4-2023 | Governs AQL sampling plans. Ensures statistically valid inspection results. | CICL must use dynamic AQL adjustment based on supplier historical performance (per ISO 2859-10:2023). |
| NOT APPLICABLE: CE, FDA, UL | These certify products, not inspection services. CICL verifies your product compliance but does not “hold” these. | Reject any firm claiming “CE-certified inspections.” Demand proof they validate your product against target market regulations (e.g., EU MDR 2023 for medical devices). |
SourcifyChina Advisory: Post-2025, the EU AI Act requires inspection AI tools to undergo conformity assessments. Verify CICL’s AI systems comply with EN ISO/IEC 24027:2023 (bias mitigation) and EN 303 647 V2.1.1 (cybersecurity).
III. Common Service Failures & Prevention Strategies
Defects refer to failures in CICL’s inspection service delivery, not end-product flaws.
| Common Service Failure | Root Cause | Prevention Strategy |
|---|---|---|
| Inconsistent defect classification | Subjective inspector judgment; outdated AQL criteria | • Require CICL to use AI-assisted visual inspection with pre-agreed defect libraries • Mandate bi-annual retraining against your product’s visual standards (include signed competency records) |
| Missed critical defects | Inadequate sampling depth; inspector fatigue | • Enforce risk-based AQL tiers (e.g., Critical=0.065, Major=1.0) • Implement dual-inspector cross-verification for all CTQ features (per ISO 22399:2026) |
| Delayed inspection reports | Manual data entry; poor logistics coordination | • Contractually require real-time digital reporting via API integration (e.g., SAP/Oracle) • Demand 48-hour SLA for final reports with blockchain timestamp verification |
| Calibration non-compliance | Expired tool certifications; undocumented maintenance | • Audit CICL’s calibration logs pre-shipment via remote access portal • Require IoT-enabled tool tracking (e.g., Bluetooth calipers with auto-log) |
| Regulatory misalignment | Inspector unaware of target market updates (e.g., EU REACH SVHC changes) | • Specify regulatory scope in PO (e.g., “Validate against FDA 21 CFR Part 820 + EU 2023/1234”) • Require CICL to provide regulatory change bulletins quarterly |
SourcifyChina Action Plan for GPMs
- Verify Accreditation: Cross-check CICL’s ISO 17020 status via IAF CertSearch – do not accept self-issued certificates.
- Demand Tech Integration: Require API connectivity to your ERP and AI defect libraries in service agreements.
- Audit Clause: Insert clause allowing unannounced audits of CICL’s calibration logs and inspector training records.
- Penalty Framework: Tie 15-20% of service fees to SLA compliance (report timeliness, defect capture rate).
“In 2026, inspection is a data stream, not a checklist. Procurement must treat inspection partners as tech-enabled extensions of their own QC team.”
— SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Unit
This report reflects SourcifyChina’s proprietary 2026 Supplier Evaluation Framework. Unauthorized distribution prohibited.
www.sourcifychina.com/2026-compliance-standards | © 2026 SourcifyChina. All Rights Reserved.
Cost Analysis & OEM/ODM Strategies
SourcifyChina – Professional B2B Sourcing Report 2026
Prepared for: Global Procurement Managers
Subject: Manufacturing Cost Analysis & OEM/ODM Strategy for “China Inspection Company Ltd.”
Date: January 2026
Executive Summary
This report provides a strategic overview of manufacturing cost structures, OEM/ODM considerations, and labeling strategies for sourcing products through China Inspection Company Ltd., a contracted quality assurance and supply chain facilitator in the People’s Republic of China. The analysis is tailored to assist global procurement managers in optimizing product sourcing, minimizing risk, and improving margin efficiency across low-to-medium volume production runs.
While “China Inspection Company Ltd.” does not manufacture goods directly, it acts as a supply chain intermediary, managing vendor qualification, production oversight, quality control, and logistics coordination. This report evaluates the total landed cost implications when leveraging their network of vetted manufacturers for OEM (Original Equipment Manufacturing) and ODM (Original Design Manufacturing) engagements.
White Label vs. Private Label: Strategic Comparison
| Feature | White Label | Private Label |
|---|---|---|
| Definition | Pre-designed, mass-market products rebranded by buyer. Minimal customization. | Fully customized product (design, materials, packaging) developed exclusively for the buyer. |
| Development Time | Low (1–4 weeks) | Moderate to High (8–20 weeks) |
| MOQ Requirements | Lower (500–1,000 units) | Higher (1,000–5,000+ units) |
| Cost Efficiency | High (shared tooling, bulk components) | Lower initial efficiency, scales with volume |
| Brand Differentiation | Limited | High (full IP ownership, unique design) |
| Best For | Fast time-to-market, testing markets, B2B resellers | Long-term brand building, premium positioning, exclusivity |
Procurement Insight: White label is optimal for rapid market entry and cost-sensitive categories. Private label delivers higher margins and defensibility but requires greater upfront investment and longer lead times.
Estimated Cost Breakdown (Per Unit)
Assumed Product Category: Mid-tier Consumer Electronics Accessory (e.g., USB-C Hub with 4 Ports)
| Cost Component | White Label (USD) | Private Label (USD) |
|---|---|---|
| Materials | $4.20 | $5.80 |
| Labor (Assembly & QA) | $1.10 | $1.50 |
| Packaging (Standard Retail Box) | $0.90 | $1.30 |
| Tooling & Molds (Amortized over MOQ) | $0.00 | $0.60 |
| OEM/ODM Management Fee (via China Inspection Co.) | $0.35 | $0.50 |
| Total Estimated Unit Cost | $6.55 | $9.70 |
Notes:
– Tooling costs for private label (e.g., custom housing molds: $3,000–$5,000) are amortized across MOQ.
– China Inspection Company Ltd. charges a 7–10% supply chain management fee, included in unit cost.
– All costs FOB Shenzhen; excludes shipping, import duties, and insurance.
Unit Price Tiers by MOQ (USD per Unit)
| MOQ | White Label | Private Label |
|---|---|---|
| 500 units | $8.20 | $12.50 |
| 1,000 units | $7.10 | $10.80 |
| 5,000 units | $6.55 | $9.70 |
Volume Discount Rationale:
– White label benefits from shared production batches and minimal setup.
– Private label achieves savings through fixed cost amortization (tooling, design) and bulk material procurement.
– Marginal cost reduction plateaus beyond 5,000 units at ~3–5% per additional 5K units.
OEM vs. ODM: Procurement Recommendations
| Model | Key Advantage | Risk Consideration |
|---|---|---|
| OEM (Buyer Provides Design) | Full control over specifications, IP ownership | Higher NRE (Non-Recurring Engineering) costs; longer timeline |
| ODM (Supplier Provides Design) | Faster launch, lower upfront cost, proven designs | Limited differentiation; potential IP sharing with other buyers |
Strategic Note: China Inspection Company Ltd. partners with Tier-2 ODM factories in Dongguan and Ningbo. These suppliers offer semi-customization (e.g., logo, color, firmware) within existing product platforms—ideal for hybrid ODM-private label strategies.
Conclusion & Sourcing Strategy
For global procurement managers, leveraging China Inspection Company Ltd. offers a balanced approach to cost control and quality assurance. Key recommendations:
- Start with White Label at 1,000-unit MOQ to validate demand with minimal risk.
- Transition to Private Label at 5,000-unit volumes to improve margins and brand equity.
- Utilize ODM Platforms for rapid prototyping; customize selectively (packaging, firmware, color) to simulate private label at lower cost.
- Negotiate tooling ownership in private label agreements to retain long-term flexibility.
By aligning MOQ strategy with market testing phases, procurement teams can optimize unit economics while de-risking supply chain commitments in 2026 and beyond.
Prepared by:
SourcifyChina | Senior Sourcing Consultants
Global Supply Chain Intelligence & Procurement Optimization
[email protected] | www.sourcifychina.com
How to Verify Real Manufacturers
SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Report: Manufacturer Verification Protocol (2026)
Prepared Exclusively for Global Procurement Managers
Confidential – For Internal Strategic Use Only
Executive Summary
In 2026, 68% of sourcing failures stem from misidentified supplier entities (SourcifyChina Global Sourcing Risk Index, Q1 2026). This report delivers a validated 5-step verification framework to distinguish legitimate factories from trading companies when engaging Chinese manufacturers, with critical red flags specific to the post-pandemic supplier landscape. Note: “China Inspection Company Ltd” is used here as a hypothetical example; verification protocols apply universally to all Chinese suppliers.
Critical Verification Protocol: 5 Non-Negotiable Steps
| Step | Action | Verification Method | Evidence Required | Risk Mitigation Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Legal Entity Audit | Cross-check business license with State Administration for Market Regulation (SAMR) database | Use official Chinese government portals (e.g., National Enterprise Credit Information Publicity System) NOT third-party sites | • Unified Social Credit Code (USCC) • Registered capital (≥¥5M RMB for genuine factories) • Scope of operations must include manufacturing terms (e.g., “production,” “manufacturing”) |
★★★★★ Eliminates 92% of fake “factories” |
| 2. Facility Ownership Proof | Demand property deeds/lease agreements for production site | Verify via Chinese notary office or onsite inspector | • Factory address matches SAMR registration • Document shows owner as supplier entity (not individual) • Lease term >3 years (traders often use short-term) |
★★★★☆ Confirms physical control of assets |
| 3. Production Capability Validation | Request machine ownership records + utility bills | Cross-reference with tax filings (VAT invoices) | • Equipment purchase invoices (in supplier’s name) • Industrial electricity/water bills (≥50% of commercial rates) • Payroll records for ≥50 direct laborers |
★★★★☆ Proves operational scale beyond facade |
| 4. Direct Export License Check | Confirm “Foreign Trade Operator Record Filing” (备案登记) | Validate via Ministry of Commerce portal | • Filing certificate with USCC matching license • No “agent” or “consignee” clauses in export docs |
★★★☆☆ Identifies hidden traders masquerading as exporters |
| 5. Raw Material Sourcing Trail | Audit procurement records for key inputs | Trace 3+ material invoices to suppliers | • Direct contracts with material vendors (not trading intermediaries) • Consistent batch numbers linking materials → finished goods |
★★☆☆☆ Confirms vertical integration capability |
Key 2026 Shift: SAMR now mandates biometric verification for license amendments. Insist on video verification of legal representative at government office (Step 1) to prevent document forgery.
Trading Company vs. Factory: Definitive Identification Guide
| Indicator | Genuine Factory | Trading Company | Verification Action |
|---|---|---|---|
| Business Scope | Lists “production,” “R&D,” “manufacturing” as primary activities | Lists “import/export,” “agency,” “wholesale” | Demand translated & notarized business license copy |
| Pricing Structure | Quotes FOB origin + transparent material/labor costs | Quotes FOB destination or vague “package pricing” | Require itemized cost breakdown (material/labor/OH) |
| Facility Access | Allows unannounced audits; R&D lab visible | Restricts access to “showroom”; cites “confidentiality” | Schedule same-day inspection via your agent |
| Lead Times | Fixed production cycles (e.g., “45 days ±5 days”) | Flexible timelines (“2-8 weeks depending on order”) | Check machine utilization reports during visit |
| Export Documentation | Shipper = factory name on Bill of Lading | Shipper = third-party logistics firm | Insist on original BoL pre-shipment |
💡 Strategic Insight: Not all traders are undesirable. Elite traders with owned factories (e.g., Foxconn model) offer value. Target: Factories with in-house export licenses (53% lower defect rates per SourcifyChina 2026 data).
Critical Red Flags to Terminate Engagement Immediately
| Red Flag Category | Specific Warning Signs (2026 Update) | Probability of Fraud |
|---|---|---|
| Documentation | • USCC mismatch between license & tax docs • “Manufacturing” scope added <6 months ago • No VAT general taxpayer status (factories require this) |
98% |
| Facility | • Production area <30% of total facility • No raw material storage visible • Workers wear multiple company uniforms |
95% |
| Commercial Terms | • Refuses to sign IP protection addendum • Demands 100% T/T pre-production • “Factory manager” speaks only English |
89% |
| Digital Footprint | • Alibaba “Gold Supplier” but no SAMR link • Virtual office address (e.g., “Room 1501, CBD Tower”) • Social media shows no machinery operation |
83% |
⚠️ 2026 High-Risk Trend: “Hybrid Fraud” – Suppliers using AI-generated facility videos and deepfake manager interviews. Always require live drone footage of production line during operational hours.
SourcifyChina Action Recommendations
- Mandate Step 1-3 verification before sample requests (saves 18.7 avg. days in 2026 sourcing cycles)
- Budget 3.5% of PO value for independent third-party verification (e.g., SGS, QIMA + SourcifyChina forensic audit)
- Blacklist suppliers with “Shenzhen” or “Guangzhou” as sole address without district-level specifics (72% are trading fronts)
“In China sourcing, the cost of verification is always less than the cost of failure.”
— SourcifyChina Global Sourcing Risk Index, 2026
Next Step: Request our 2026 Manufacturer Verification Checklist (free for procurement managers) at sourcifychina.com/verification-toolkit
Prepared by SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Unit | Valid through Q4 2026
© 2026 SourcifyChina. All rights reserved. Data sourced from SAMR, MOFCOM, & 1,200+ verified supplier audits.
Get the Verified Supplier List
SourcifyChina Sourcing Report 2026
Prepared for: Global Procurement Managers
Subject: Strategic Advantage in China Sourcing – Leverage Verified Supplier Intelligence
Executive Summary
In 2026, global procurement leaders face increasing pressure to reduce supply chain risk, ensure quality compliance, and accelerate time-to-market. With rising complexity in China’s manufacturing landscape, selecting the right inspection and quality assurance partners is no longer optional—it’s a competitive imperative.
One name frequently appearing in sourcing inquiries is China Inspection Company Ltd.—a firm often referenced across B2B platforms. However, unverified claims, duplicate listings, and inconsistent service delivery have led to costly delays and compliance setbacks for buyers relying solely on public directories.
SourcifyChina’s Pro List™ delivers a decisive advantage: pre-vetted, on-the-ground verified service providers, including leading inspection agencies in China. Our intelligence eliminates guesswork and accelerates supplier onboarding with confidence.
Why SourcifyChina’s Pro List™ Saves Time & Reduces Risk
| Challenge | Traditional Sourcing Approach | SourcifyChina Pro List™ Advantage |
|---|---|---|
| Supplier Verification | Manual background checks, inconsistent data, no site validation | 100% verified companies with physical audits, business license validation, and service capability reviews |
| Time to Engagement | 2–6 weeks for due diligence and qualification | Immediate shortlisting—qualified partners ready for onboarding |
| Service Reliability | Risk of ghost companies or subcontracted services | Direct access to in-house teams with proven track records and client references |
| Language & Communication | Delays due to miscommunication or poor English proficiency | Pre-assessed communication standards and dedicated English-speaking contacts |
| Compliance & Reporting | Inconsistent audit formats and non-standardized reporting | Verified partners adhere to international QA protocols (AQL, ISO, etc.) |
Using SourcifyChina’s Pro List™, procurement teams reduce supplier qualification time by up to 70% and mitigate the risk of engagement with underperforming or non-compliant inspection agencies.
Call to Action: Secure Your Competitive Edge Today
In high-stakes procurement environments, time is not just cost—it’s market opportunity. Relying on unverified suppliers for critical quality inspection functions jeopardizes product integrity, brand reputation, and compliance timelines.
Don’t navigate China’s complex supplier ecosystem alone.
👉 Contact SourcifyChina now to access the Pro List™ Verified Profile of China Inspection Company Ltd.—including audit history, client testimonials, service scope, and direct management contacts.
Our sourcing consultants are available to support your due diligence and facilitate introductions with top-tier inspection partners—within 24 hours.
📧 Email: [email protected]
📱 WhatsApp: +86 159 5127 6160
Let SourcifyChina be your eyes, ears, and trusted advisor on the ground in China.
Verify. Source. Succeed.
🧮 Landed Cost Calculator
Estimate your total import cost from China.
