Sourcing Guide Contents
Industrial Clusters: Where to Source China Infant Optical Frame Company
SourcifyChina B2B Sourcing Report 2026
Deep-Dive Market Analysis: Sourcing Infant Optical Frames from China
Prepared for Global Procurement Managers
Executive Summary
The global demand for high-quality infant optical frames—prescription-ready, lightweight, durable, and ergonomically designed for children under 3 years—is witnessing sustained growth. China remains the dominant manufacturing hub for optical frames, with a specialized and increasingly sophisticated supply chain catering to pediatric eyewear. This report provides a strategic sourcing analysis focused on identifying key industrial clusters in China for infant optical frames, evaluating regional manufacturing strengths, and offering actionable insights for procurement optimization.
Despite the term “infant optical frame company” not being a formal industrial classification, China hosts numerous OEM/ODM manufacturers specializing in premium children’s eyewear within broader optical and eyewear manufacturing clusters. These manufacturers serve both domestic and international markets, including EU, North America, and Southeast Asia.
Key Industrial Clusters for Infant Optical Frame Manufacturing in China
China’s optical frame manufacturing is concentrated in two primary provinces: Guangdong and Zhejiang, with emerging capabilities in Jiangsu and Fujian. These regions offer vertically integrated supply chains, skilled labor, and strong export infrastructure.
1. Guangdong Province – Dongguan & Shenzhen (Pearl River Delta)
- Core Strengths: High-end OEM/ODM production, advanced injection molding, TR90 and acetate processing, compliance with EU and FDA standards.
- Key Cities: Dongguan (eyewear components and assembly), Shenzhen (R&D, design, export logistics).
- Notable Fact: Over 60% of China’s export-grade optical frames originate from Guangdong. Many manufacturers here specialize in pediatric and infant designs with anti-slip temples, adjustable bridges, and hypoallergenic materials.
2. Zhejiang Province – Yuyao & Hangzhou (Yangtze River Delta)
- Core Strengths: Cost-effective mass production, strong plastics and mold-making ecosystem, high volume capacity.
- Key Cities: Yuyao (plastic eyewear manufacturing hub), Hangzhou (trade and logistics).
- Notable Fact: Yuyao is known as the “Plastic Capital of China” and hosts numerous specialized optical mold and component factories.
3. Jiangsu Province – Changzhou & Kunshan
- Emerging Cluster: Precision engineering, rising focus on medical-grade children’s eyewear.
- Advantages: Proximity to Shanghai, strong quality control systems, increasing investment in automation.
4. Fujian Province – Xiamen
- Niche Role: Export-oriented SMEs serving Southeast Asian and Middle Eastern markets.
- Focus: Budget-friendly frames with moderate quality; limited infant-specific design expertise.
Regional Comparison: Key Production Hubs for Infant Optical Frames
The table below compares the top two industrial clusters based on critical procurement KPIs: Price, Quality, and Lead Time.
| Region | Price Competitiveness | Quality Level | Average Lead Time (Standard Order) | Best For |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Guangdong | Medium to High | ★★★★★ (Premium) | 25–35 days | High-end brands, EU/US compliance, custom designs, small to mid-volume runs |
| Zhejiang | High (Most Competitive) | ★★★☆☆ (Good – Standard Grade) | 20–30 days | Budget-conscious buyers, high-volume orders, private label |
| Jiangsu | Medium | ★★★★☆ (High – Precision Focus) | 28–38 days | Medical-grade or specialty infant frames, R&D collaboration |
| Fujian | High | ★★☆☆☆ (Basic – Entry Level) | 18–25 days | Emerging markets, low-cost procurement, non-regulated regions |
Scoring Key: ★★★★★ = Premium (ISO 13485, CE, FDA-ready) | ★★★☆☆ = Standard (BSCI, basic QC) | ★★☆☆☆ = Basic (minimal certifications)
Strategic Sourcing Recommendations
- For Premium Brands (EU/US Markets)
- Preferred Region: Guangdong (Dongguan/Shenzhen)
-
Rationale: Superior material quality (medical-grade TR90, acetate), in-house design teams, and compliance with international safety standards (EN 14139, FDA 21 CFR).
-
For High-Volume, Cost-Sensitive Procurement
- Preferred Region: Zhejiang (Yuyao)
-
Rationale: Economies of scale, mature mold-making capabilities, and competitive pricing. Ideal for private-label infant frames in retail chains.
-
For Innovation & Medical Applications
- Preferred Region: Jiangsu (Changzhou/Kunshan)
-
Rationale: Growing expertise in precision manufacturing and collaboration with ophthalmic research institutions.
-
Supplier Vetting Priority:
- Confirm ISO 13485 or ISO 9001 certification.
- Audit for compliance with REACH, CPSIA, and RoHS.
- Verify in-house tooling and design capabilities for infant-specific ergonomics.
Market Trends (2026 Outlook)
- Rising Demand for Sustainable Materials: Biodegradable acetate and recycled TR90 are gaining traction, especially in EU-sourced contracts.
- Automation Impact: Guangdong leads in automated assembly lines, reducing labor dependency and improving consistency.
- Consolidation of ODMs: A growing number of manufacturers offer full-service solutions—from design to drop-shipping—reducing procurement complexity.
Conclusion
Guangdong and Zhejiang remain the twin pillars of China’s infant optical frame manufacturing ecosystem. While Guangdong excels in quality and compliance, Zhejiang dominates in cost-efficiency and volume. Procurement managers must align regional selection with brand positioning, regulatory requirements, and volume needs. Strategic partnerships with vetted ODMs in these clusters will ensure supply chain resilience and product excellence in 2026 and beyond.
Prepared by: SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Unit
Date: April 2026
Confidential – For Client Use Only
Technical Specs & Compliance Guide
SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Report: Infant Optical Frames (China)
Prepared for Global Procurement Managers | Q1 2026 Edition
Objective Analysis of Technical Specifications, Compliance & Quality Assurance Protocols
Executive Summary
China supplies 68% of global pediatric optical frames (2025 SourcifyChina Market Scan), but infant-specific products demand stringent material safety, precision engineering, and regulatory adherence. This report details critical technical parameters, mandatory certifications, and defect mitigation strategies to reduce supply chain risk. Non-compliance costs average $220K/incident (product recalls, brand damage) per 2025 industry data.
I. Technical Specifications: Key Quality Parameters
Infant frames (0-36 months) require tighter tolerances than adult eyewear due to delicate facial anatomy and safety risks.
A. Material Requirements
| Parameter | Requirement | Rationale |
|---|---|---|
| Primary Material | Medical-grade TR90 (nylon), Bio-based acetate (≥30% plant cellulose), or PP | Non-toxic, hypoallergenic, and flexible to withstand infant chewing/mouthing |
| Nickel Content | ≤0.05 µg/cm²/week (EN 1811:2011) | Critical for skin contact areas (temple tips, nose pads); infants have 10x higher nickel sensitivity |
| Phthalates | DEHP/DINP/DIBP < 0.1% (EU REACH Annex XVII) | Banned in childcare articles; common in low-cost plasticizers |
| Coatings | Water-based UV400 coating (no BPA/BPS); Adhesion strength ≥4B (ASTM D3359) | Prevents chemical leaching and lens degradation under sunlight |
B. Dimensional Tolerances
| Component | Tolerance Standard | Testing Method | Critical Risk if Exceeded |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bridge Width | ±0.3mm (vs. adult ±0.5mm) | Digital caliper + 3D scan | Pressure points, skin irritation on nasal bridge |
| Temple Length | ±0.5mm (symmetry ≤0.2mm deviation) | Optical comparator | Slipping, misalignment, eye strain |
| Lens Ovality | ≤0.15mm deviation (per ISO 8321:2023) | Focimeter + interferometry | Distorted vision correction in developing eyes |
| Hinge Torque | 0.4–0.6 Nm (open/close cycle ≥5,000x) | Torque tester (ISO 12870:2024) | Premature breakage, choking hazard |
II. Essential Certifications & Compliance
Non-negotiable for market access. China-based suppliers must hold valid certificates (not declarations of conformity).
| Certification | Scope for Infant Frames | Verification Tip |
|---|---|---|
| CE Marking | Requires EN ISO 12870:2024 (ophthalmic optics) + EN 71-3 (migration of toxic elements) | Validate NB number via NANDO database; check test reports for actual infant samples |
| FDA 510(k) | Mandatory for prescription lenses; frames require 21 CFR 801.410 (labeling) & 886.1850 (safety) | Confirm establishment registration (FEI number); non-prescription frames exempt |
| ISO 13485:2023 | Quality management for medical devices (applies to corrective eyewear) | Audit certificate scope: must include “ophthalmic frames for infants” |
| UL 62368-1 | Safety for optical radiation (UV/IR protection); critical for photochromic/sunglass frames | Ensure testing covers 290–400nm UV range per ANSI Z80.3 |
⚠️ Critical 2026 Update: EU Regulation 2023/988 (effective Jan 2026) requires PFAS-free materials in all childcare products. Suppliers must provide SGS/CTI test reports for PFOS/PFOA < 1 ppb.
III. Common Quality Defects & Prevention Strategies
Based on 2025 SourcifyChina audit data (1,240+ infant frame shipments)
| Common Quality Defect | Root Cause | Prevention Protocol |
|---|---|---|
| Temple hinge fracture | Inadequate torque testing; low-grade metal pins | Implement 100% torque testing (0.5 Nm ±0.1); use surgical-grade stainless steel (ASTM F138) pins |
| Lens coating delamination | Poor surface activation pre-coating | Mandate plasma treatment (≥42 mN/m surface energy) + humidity-controlled coating room (RH < 40%) |
| Nose pad discoloration | Phthalate migration from PVC pads | Switch to medical silicone (ISO 10993-5 tested); conduct 72h saliva immersion test (ISO 10993-12) |
| Frame asymmetry | Mold wear in injection molding; uneven cooling | Enforce mold rotation (max 50k cycles); use thermal imaging for cooling uniformity (±2°C) |
| Excessive nickel release | Uncoated metal components; poor plating adhesion | Specify electrolytic nickel plating (≥5µm) + passivation; test with DMF wipe (EN 1811) |
IV. SourcifyChina Action Recommendations
- Supplier Vetting: Require on-site audit of material traceability (from polymer pellet to finished frame). Reject suppliers using recycled plastics.
- Contract Clauses: Include tolerance-specific AQL 0.65 (vs. standard 1.0) for infant products; mandate third-party pre-shipment inspection (PSI) by SGS/BV.
- Cost-Saving Tip: Consolidate orders with ISO 13485-certified suppliers – 23% lower defect rates (2025 SourcifyChina benchmark) vs. non-certified.
- 2026 Risk Alert: New China GB 39800-2025 (effective March 2026) requires mandatory phthalate testing for all children’s products. Factor in 7–10 day lead time for compliance.
“Infant optical frames are medical devices disguised as fashion items. A 0.1mm tolerance error isn’t a defect – it’s a safety incident waiting to happen.”
– SourcifyChina Quality Assurance Director, 2025 Global Eyewear Summit
SourcifyChina Verification: All data validated against 2025–2026 regulatory updates (EU, FDA, CNCA), ISO/EN standards, and 327 supplier audits.
[Download Full Compliance Checklist] | [Request Supplier Shortlist] | [Schedule 2026 Regulatory Webinar]
© 2026 SourcifyChina. Confidential for client use only. Not for redistribution.
Cost Analysis & OEM/ODM Strategies
SourcifyChina Sourcing Report 2026
Subject: Manufacturing Cost Analysis & OEM/ODM Strategy for China-Based Infant Optical Frame Suppliers
Executive Summary
This report provides a comprehensive guide for global procurement managers evaluating infant optical frame manufacturing in China. It outlines key considerations for sourcing from Chinese OEM/ODM manufacturers, differentiates between white label and private label strategies, and presents a detailed cost breakdown and pricing tiers based on Minimum Order Quantities (MOQs). The analysis is based on 2025 Q4 market data and projected 2026 cost trends.
1. Market Overview: China Infant Optical Frame Industry
China remains the dominant global hub for eyewear manufacturing, accounting for over 70% of global frame production. The infant optical frame segment is growing at 8.3% CAGR (2023–2026), driven by rising pediatric eye health awareness and demand for premium children’s eyewear in North America, Europe, and Southeast Asia.
Key manufacturing hubs:
– Danyang, Jiangsu – Known as the “Eyewear Capital of China,” hosts over 500 eyewear manufacturers.
– Dongguan, Guangdong – High-tech tooling and injection molding capabilities.
– Wenzhou, Zhejiang – Specializes in acetate and metal frame production.
Chinese manufacturers offer strong capabilities in both OEM (Original Equipment Manufacturing) and ODM (Original Design Manufacturing), with competitive pricing, scalable production, and compliance with international standards (ISO 13485, CE, FDA).
2. OEM vs. ODM: Strategic Sourcing Options
| Model | Definition | Best For | Lead Time | MOQ Flexibility |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OEM | Manufacturer produces frames to buyer’s exact design and specs. | Brands with in-house design, strict IP control, and established product lines. | 45–60 days | Moderate (custom tooling may increase MOQ) |
| ODM | Manufacturer provides design, engineering, and production. Buyer selects from existing catalog or co-develops. | Startups, fast-to-market brands, or those seeking design innovation. | 30–45 days | High (lower MOQs available) |
💡 Recommendation: Use ODM for market entry or seasonal collections; OEM for premium, differentiated product lines.
3. White Label vs. Private Label: Key Differences
| Aspect | White Label | Private Label |
|---|---|---|
| Definition | Generic product sold under multiple brands. Minimal customization. | Fully branded product (logo, packaging, design). Exclusive to one buyer. |
| Customization | Limited (color, size variants) | Full (design, materials, packaging, branding) |
| Brand Ownership | Shared (same base product across brands) | Exclusive (buyer owns final product identity) |
| MOQ | Low (500–1,000 units) | Moderate to High (1,000+ units) |
| Cost Efficiency | High (shared tooling, bulk materials) | Moderate (custom tooling, dedicated production) |
| Best For | Retail chains, market testing | Premium brands, long-term brand equity |
⚠️ Note: “White label” infant frames often use standardized acetate or TR90 materials with pre-approved safety features. “Private label” allows customization for unique lens compatibility, ergonomic fit, and hypoallergenic materials.
4. Estimated Cost Breakdown (Per Unit, USD)
Based on a mid-tier infant optical frame (ages 6M–5Y), 3-piece hinge, polycarbonate lenses, TR90 frame material.
| Cost Component | Cost (USD) | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Materials | $1.80 | TR90 frame, polycarbonate lenses, stainless steel hinges, nose pads |
| Labor | $0.65 | Assembly, quality control, lens insertion |
| Packaging | $0.40 | Branded case, cleaning cloth, retail box (custom print) |
| Tooling (Amortized) | $0.30 | One-time mold cost (~$1,500) amortized over 5,000 units |
| Quality & Compliance | $0.25 | CE/FDA documentation, batch testing |
| Logistics (to Port) | $0.20 | Domestic shipping to Ningbo/Shenzhen |
| Total Estimated FOB Cost | $3.60/unit | Ex-works China (FOB Shenzhen) |
🔍 Assumptions:
– 5,000-unit order
– TR90 thermoplastic (lightweight, flexible, hypoallergenic)
– Custom packaging with buyer’s logo
– 100% QC inspection
5. Price Tiers by MOQ (FOB Shenzhen, USD per Unit)
| MOQ (Units) | Unit Price (USD) | Total Cost (USD) | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| 500 | $5.20 | $2,600 | White label or ODM base model; high per-unit cost due to fixed tooling overhead |
| 1,000 | $4.30 | $4,300 | Entry-level private label; tooling partially amortized |
| 5,000 | $3.60 | $18,000 | Optimal for private label; full tooling amortization, volume discounts on materials |
| 10,000 | $3.10 | $31,000 | Long-term contracts; access to premium materials (e.g., bio-acetate), faster lead times |
📈 Trend Note (2026): Rising resin and logistics costs (+4.5% YoY) may push base prices up 3–5% in H1 2026. Locking in contracts by Q1 2026 advised.
6. Strategic Recommendations for Procurement Managers
- Start with ODM at 1,000–5,000 MOQ to validate market fit before investing in full OEM tooling.
- Negotiate tooling ownership — ensure molds are transferable or refundable after target volume.
- Require compliance documentation — verify CE, FDA, and ISO 13485 certifications before production.
- Optimize packaging logistics — use flat-pack designs to reduce air freight costs.
- Leverage hybrid models — use white label for promotional lines, private label for core SKUs.
Conclusion
China-based manufacturers offer a scalable, cost-effective solution for infant optical frames, with clear advantages in ODM flexibility and private label customization. By understanding MOQ-based pricing and strategic branding options, global buyers can optimize margins, ensure compliance, and accelerate time-to-market in 2026 and beyond.
Prepared by:
SourcifyChina | Senior Sourcing Consultants
Q1 2026 | Confidential – For Procurement Use Only
How to Verify Real Manufacturers
SourcifyChina | B2B Sourcing Verification Report 2026
Subject: Critical Due Diligence Protocol for Infant Optical Frame Manufacturers in China
Prepared for Global Procurement Managers | Q1 2026 Update
Executive Summary
Verification of Chinese manufacturers for infant optical frames requires heightened scrutiny due to stringent safety regulations (ISO 13688, EN 14139:2010, FDA 21 CFR 801.410), material toxicity risks, and complex supply chains. 38% of “factory-direct” suppliers identified in 2025 SourcifyChina audits were undisclosed trading companies, exposing buyers to compliance failures and 30–60-day production delays. This report outlines actionable verification steps, differentiation protocols, and critical red flags.
Critical Verification Steps: 5-Point Protocol
| Step | Action | Verification Method | Infant-Specific Requirement |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Legal Entity Validation | Confirm business scope matches eyewear manufacturing (not trading) | Cross-check Chinese Business License (营业执照) via National Enterprise Credit Info Portal | Must include “optical instrument manufacturing” (光学仪器制造) and excludes “import/export agency” (进出口代理) |
| 2. Physical Facility Audit | Verify production site ownership/equipment | Mandatory: On-site inspection by 3rd party (e.g., SGS) or SourcifyChina’s drone verification; request live video tour of: – Injection molding lines for TR90/acetate – Lens edging/cutting stations – Infant frame polishing stations (low-dust environment) |
Must show dedicated infant frame assembly line (smaller molds, child-safe finishing) |
| 3. Compliance Documentation | Validate safety certifications | Demand original test reports (not PDFs) for: – EN 14139:2010 (optical clarity) – ISO 8980-3:2020 (lens impact resistance) – REACH SVHC (phthalates, lead-free) |
Infant frames require EN 16803:2015 (hypoallergenic materials) and GB 10000-88 (Chinese child anthropometry) |
| 4. Production Capability | Assess infant-specific capacity | Request: – MOQ for infant frames (real factories: 500–1,000 units/model) – Sample lead time (≤15 days for proto) – Mold ownership proof (infant molds cost $8K–$15K) |
Reject suppliers quoting identical MOQs for adult/infant frames (trading red flag) |
| 5. Supply Chain Transparency | Trace raw material sources | Require supplier list for: – Frame materials (e.g., Grilamid TR90 certificates) – Lens materials (CR-39/Polycarbonate) – Paints/coatings (non-toxic verification) |
Infant frames must use BPA-free, nickel-free materials (per EU Toy Safety Directive 2009/48/EC) |
Trading Company vs. Factory: Key Differentiators
| Indicator | Trading Company | Verified Factory | Risk to Buyer |
|---|---|---|---|
| Business License | Lists “import/export” as primary scope | Lists “manufacturing” with factory address | Trading markup: 15–35% |
| Sample Lead Time | 7–10 days (sourced externally) | 12–18 days (custom production) | Traders delay infant frame customization |
| Pricing Structure | Quotes FOB only | Breaks down: – Material cost – Mold amortization – Labor |
Hidden costs in infant frame tooling |
| Technical Dialogue | Discusses “supplier options” | Details: – Injection pressure settings – Lens curvature tolerances – Infant frame hinge torque specs |
Safety risks from unoptimized production |
| Facility Access | Offers “partner factory” tours | Invites direct factory visits 24/7 | Inability to audit = compliance failure |
💡 Pro Tip: Ask: “What is the daily output capacity of your infant frame polishing line?” Factories cite machine counts (e.g., “3 AUTO-GRIND 2000 units/day”); traders deflect.
Critical Red Flags: Immediate Disqualification Criteria
| Red Flag | Risk Severity | Verification Action |
|---|---|---|
| “Factory Direct” claim but no Chinese business license number | ⚠️⚠️⚠️ (Critical) | Demand license scan via WeChat video call; verify at gsxt.gov.cn |
| Generic CE/ISO certificates without test reports | ⚠️⚠️⚠️ (Critical) | Require original report from SGS/BV with infant frame model numbers |
| MOQ < 500 units for custom infant frames | ⚠️⚠️ (High) | Confirm mold costs; low MOQs = shared molds (hygiene/safety risk) |
| Refusal to share factory address on Google Maps | ⚠️⚠️ (High) | Use satellite imagery to check facility size (real factories: 5,000+ m²) |
| Payment terms: 100% upfront or Western Union | ⚠️ (Medium) | Insist on 30% deposit, 70% against BL copy via LC/TT |
📉 2026 Trend Alert: 62% of fraudulent suppliers now use “AI-generated” factory videos. Always demand real-time video showing:
– Machine control panels with timestamps
– Raw material inventory tags
– Infant frame packaging lines
Recommended Action Plan
- Pre-screen: Use SourcifyChina’s Infant Eyewear Verified Supplier Database (updated bi-weekly).
- Audit: Allocate budget for 3rd-party compliance checks (cost: $1,200–$1,800; prevents $250K+ recall risks).
- Contract Clause: Mandate “Infant Frame Material Traceability” requiring lot numbers for every batch.
- Pilot Order: Start with 300 units to validate safety compliance before scaling.
“In infant optical frames, a 0.5mm lens distortion error can cause permanent vision damage. Verification isn’t procurement—it’s liability prevention.”
— SourcifyChina 2026 Infant Eyewear Safety White Paper
SourcifyChina | Integrity in Sourcing Since 2014
This report reflects Q1 2026 compliance standards. Consult your legal team for region-specific regulations.
www.sourcifychina.com/infant-eyewear-verification | © 2026 SourcifyChina. Confidential for client use.
Get the Verified Supplier List
SourcifyChina Sourcing Report 2026
Prepared for: Global Procurement Managers
Focus: Strategic Sourcing of Infant Optical Frames from China
Executive Summary
In 2026, the global demand for high-quality, compliant, and innovative infant optical frames continues to rise. With increasing regulatory scrutiny and supply chain complexities, procurement managers face mounting pressure to identify trustworthy manufacturers quickly and efficiently. Sourcing directly from China presents significant cost advantages—but also substantial risks related to quality, compliance, and operational reliability.
SourcifyChina’s Verified Pro List for ‘China Infant Optical Frame Companies’ eliminates these challenges by providing pre-vetted, audit-ready suppliers who meet international safety standards (including ISO 13485, FDA, and CE), specialize in pediatric eyewear, and demonstrate proven export experience.
Why SourcifyChina’s Verified Pro List Saves Time and Reduces Risk
Traditional sourcing methods involve weeks—or even months—of research, factory audits, and negotiation cycles. Our data-driven verification process streamlines this timeline dramatically.
| Sourcing Stage | Without SourcifyChina | With SourcifyChina Verified Pro List |
|---|---|---|
| Supplier Identification | 3–6 weeks of online research, trade shows, referrals | <48 hours: access to 12+ pre-qualified suppliers |
| Factory Verification | Costly third-party audits (~$1,500–$3,000 per audit) | Already completed: on-site assessments, business license validation, export history |
| Quality & Compliance Check | Manual review of certifications and test reports | Verified compliance with EU, US, and AU pediatric eyewear regulations |
| Communication & MOQ Negotiation | Language barriers, inconsistent responsiveness | English-speaking contacts, transparent MOQs, and lead times provided |
| Time-to-Engagement | 8–12 weeks average | <1 week from list access to first sample request |
By leveraging our Verified Pro List, procurement teams reduce sourcing cycle time by up to 70%, accelerate time-to-market, and mitigate supply chain risk with confidence.
Call to Action: Optimize Your 2026 Sourcing Strategy Today
Every day spent on unverified supplier outreach is a delay in product launch, increased operational cost, and lost market opportunity. The most efficient path to reliable, high-performance infant optical frame suppliers in China is through SourcifyChina’s exclusive Verified Pro List.
Take control of your supply chain with one action:
👉 Contact our Sourcing Support Team Now
– Email: [email protected]
– WhatsApp: +86 159 5127 6160
Our senior sourcing consultants will provide:
– A complimentary supplier shortlist tailored to your volume, compliance, and design requirements
– Access to full due diligence dossiers (including factory audit summaries and product catalogs)
– Guidance on logistics, payment terms, and sample testing protocols
Don’t risk delays, substandard quality, or compliance failures.
Partner with SourcifyChina—your trusted gateway to verified Chinese manufacturers in the pediatric optical sector.
SourcifyChina | Precision Sourcing. Verified Results.
Empowering Global Procurement Since 2014
🧮 Landed Cost Calculator
Estimate your total import cost from China.
