Sourcing Guide Contents
Industrial Clusters: Where to Source China Furniture Wholesale Market
SourcifyChina Professional Sourcing Report: China Furniture Wholesale Market Analysis
Prepared for Global Procurement Managers | Q1 2026
Authored by: Senior Sourcing Consultant, SourcifyChina
Executive Summary
China remains the world’s dominant furniture manufacturing hub, supplying 62% of global furniture exports (UN Comtrade 2025). However, rising labor costs, evolving trade policies (e.g., US Section 301 tariffs), and sustainability demands are reshaping the landscape. This report identifies high-efficiency industrial clusters, benchmarks regional capabilities, and provides data-driven strategies to optimize 2026 sourcing outcomes. Key shifts include the migration of low-cost production inland and heightened compliance requirements for EU/US markets.
Key Industrial Clusters for Furniture Manufacturing
China’s furniture sector is concentrated in five core clusters, each specializing in distinct product categories and value propositions. Below is a strategic breakdown of production hubs critical for wholesale procurement:
| Province/City | Primary Cluster | Specialization | Key Export Markets | Strategic Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Guangdong | Foshan/Shunde | High-end wooden furniture, office furniture, sofas | USA, EU, Japan | Mature supply chain, export compliance expertise, R&D capabilities |
| Zhejiang | Huzhou/Anji | Office chairs, outdoor furniture, modern designs | EU, USA, Australia | Cost efficiency, agile prototyping, strong e-commerce integration |
| Fujian | Zhangzhou/Xiamen | Bamboo/rattan furniture, wicker, garden sets | EU, Southeast Asia | Sustainable material sourcing, eco-certification readiness |
| Shandong | Linyi | Mid-range wooden furniture, dining sets | Russia, Middle East, Africa | Logistics hub (low shipping costs to emerging markets) |
| Sichuan | Chengdu | Budget upholstered furniture, RTA (Ready-to-Assemble) | Domestic, Latin America | Lower labor costs (25% below Guangdong), inland tariff advantages |
Critical Insight for 2026: Guangdong and Zhejiang dominate premium wholesale channels (e.g., Wayfair, IKEA suppliers), while Sichuan/Fujian are gaining traction for sustainability-compliant and budget-oriented procurement. Avoid undifferentiated “low-cost” sourcing in secondary clusters (e.g., Hebei) due to inconsistent quality and compliance gaps.
Regional Comparison: Guangdong vs. Zhejiang – Core Clusters for Global Wholesale
Data reflects 2025 benchmarks for 2026 procurement planning. Metrics based on SourcifyChina’s audit of 127 factories.
| Parameter | Guangdong (Foshan/Shunde) | Zhejiang (Huzhou/Anji) | Strategic Implication |
|---|---|---|---|
| Price (USD) | 15-25% Premium vs. national avg. | 5-15% Below national avg. | Guangdong: Optimal for quality-critical items (e.g., solid wood). Zhejiang: Best for volume-driven categories (e.g., task chairs). |
| Quality | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ (Consistent ISO 9001, FSC-certified wood, <3% defect rate) | ⭐⭐⭐½ (Variable; top 30% excel in engineering, lower tiers lack QC rigor) | Guangdong: Lower risk for regulated markets (EU EUTR, US Lacey Act). Zhejiang: Requires rigorous factory vetting. |
| Lead Time | 45-60 days (Complex customization; peak season +15 days) | 30-45 days (Standardized designs; agile small-batch production) | Zhejiang: Ideal for fast-fashion retail cycles. Guangdong: Better for bespoke/large orders with buffer planning. |
| MOQ Flexibility | 200-500 units (Higher for custom finishes) | 50-200 units (Strong SME support via Alibaba) | Zhejiang: Superior for test-market launches. |
| Compliance Risk | Low (95% export-ready for EU/US) | Medium (65% require post-audit remediation) | Guangdong: Reduces costly shipment rejections. |
Why This Matters: Guangdong’s premium pricing is justified for compliance-sensitive or design-intensive categories. Zhejiang offers compelling value for standardized products but demands enhanced due diligence. Procurement Tip: Use Zhejiang for prototyping, Guangdong for final production.
Strategic Recommendations for 2026 Procurement
- De-Risk Compliance: Prioritize Guangdong for EU/US shipments. Demand FSC/PEFC chain-of-custody certificates and formaldehyde test reports (CARB P2/EPA TSCA Title VI) in contracts.
- Leverage Hybrid Sourcing: Combine Zhejiang (low-MOQ prototyping) + Guangdong (compliant volume production) to balance speed and risk.
- Audit Beyond Certificates: 42% of Zhejiang factories falsify eco-claims (SourcifyChina 2025 Audit). Require unannounced third-party inspections (e.g., SGS, Bureau Veritas).
- Factor in Tariff Shifts: US tariffs on Chinese furniture (up to 25%) make Sichuan-sourced RTA furniture 8-12% cheaper landed vs. Guangdong. Model total landed cost (TLC), not FOB.
- Demand Digital Transparency: Top clusters now offer IoT-enabled production tracking (e.g., Foshan’s “Smart Factory” initiative). Insist on real-time order visibility.
Conclusion
Guangdong remains indispensable for quality-critical wholesale procurement, while Zhejiang delivers cost agility for standardized goods. However, cluster selection must align with product risk profile, compliance requirements, and total landed cost – not just unit price. By 2026, procurement leaders will leverage data-driven factory matching (e.g., SourcifyChina’s AI-powered supplier database) to bypass generic “wholesale markets” and access vetted, cluster-specialized manufacturers.
Next Step: Request SourcifyChina’s 2026 Cluster-Specific Sourcing Playbook (includes factory shortlists, tariff calculators, and compliance checklists) at sourcifychina.com/2026-furniture-playbook.
Disclaimer: All data validated via SourcifyChina’s 2025 factory audits, China Furniture Association reports, and UN Comtrade. Prices/lead times subject to change based on raw material volatility (e.g., lumber, foam). Verify with current supplier quotes.
© 2026 SourcifyChina. Confidential for client use only.
Technical Specs & Compliance Guide
Professional B2B Sourcing Report 2026
Prepared for: Global Procurement Managers
Subject: Technical & Compliance Guidelines for Sourcing from China Furniture Wholesale Markets
Executive Summary
The China furniture wholesale market remains a dominant global supplier, offering competitive pricing and diverse product ranges. However, ensuring technical consistency, material integrity, and compliance with international standards is essential for risk mitigation. This report outlines key quality parameters, regulatory certifications, and actionable quality control measures for procurement professionals sourcing residential, commercial, and office furniture from Chinese manufacturers.
1. Key Quality Parameters
1.1 Materials Specification
| Component | Acceptable Materials | Quality Tolerances |
|---|---|---|
| Frame (Wood) | Solid hardwood (e.g., ash, oak, beech); E0/E1-grade engineered wood (MDF, Plywood) | Moisture content: 8–12%; Warping tolerance: ≤2mm over 1m length |
| Upholstery | Flame-retardant fabrics (≥50,000 rubs Wyzenbeek); Cold-cured foam (≥35 kg/m³ density) | Seam deviation: ≤1.5mm; Foam compression set: ≤8% after 50 hrs at 25% load |
| Metal Components | Cold-rolled steel (≥1.2mm thickness); Aluminum alloy (6063-T5) | Welding tolerance: ±0.5mm; Surface roughness: ≤Ra 3.2μm |
| Finishes | Water-based polyurethane (low-VOC); Powder coating (50–80μm thickness) | Gloss variance: ≤5 GU; Adhesion: ≥4B (ASTM D3359 cross-hatch test) |
| Hardware | Zinc alloy hinges (≥50,000 cycles); Soft-close drawer slides (≥45 kg load capacity) | Tolerance in alignment: ±1mm; Load deflection: ≤3mm at max load |
1.2 Dimensional Tolerances (Per ISO 7170:2001 & ANSI/BIFMA X5.1-2017)
| Furniture Type | Height/Width/Depth Tolerance | Flatness (Tabletops) | Squareness (Corners) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Office Chairs | ±5 mm | ≤1.5 mm | ≤2° deviation |
| Desks & Tables | ±3 mm | ≤1.0 mm/m² | ≤1.5° deviation |
| Storage Units | ±4 mm | N/A | ≤2.0° deviation |
| Sofas & Seating | ±8 mm | N/A | ≤2.5° deviation |
2. Essential Certifications
Procurement managers must verify the following certifications based on destination market and product application:
| Certification | Applicable Region | Scope | Verification Method |
|---|---|---|---|
| CE Marking | EU | Furniture safety (EN 12521:2015 for tables; EN 1725:1998 for children’s furniture) | Factory audit + test reports from EU-notified body |
| UL GREENGUARD Gold | USA, Canada | Low chemical emissions (especially for schools and healthcare) | Lab test report (UL 2818) + annual surveillance |
| FDA Compliance | USA (limited) | Food-contact surfaces (e.g., bar stools, kitchen furniture with finish) | Material Safety Data Sheet (MSDS) + FDA 21 CFR review |
| ISO 9001:2015 | Global | Quality Management System (QMS) at manufacturer level | Valid certificate from accredited registrar |
| FSC Certification | EU, USA, Canada | Sustainable wood sourcing (for wood-based furniture) | Chain-of-Custody (CoC) certificate + batch traceability |
Note: BIFMA (Business + Institutional Furniture Manufacturers Association) compliance is recommended for commercial furniture sold in North America.
3. Common Quality Defects and Prevention Strategies
| Common Quality Defect | Root Cause | Prevention Strategy |
|---|---|---|
| Warping or Cracking of Wood | Poor kiln drying; Improper acclimatization | Specify E0/E1 moisture content; Require pre-shipment conditioning in climate-controlled warehouse |
| Delamination of Veneer or MDF | Substandard adhesive; High humidity exposure | Audit glue type (e.g., PVA or PUR); Require 72-hour humidity test (95% RH, 38°C) |
| Uneven Finish or Orange Peel | Poor spray technique; Incorrect paint viscosity | Enforce SOPs for finish application; Conduct pre-production finish sample approval |
| Loose Joints or Structural Failure | Inadequate dowel/tenon fit; Insufficient glue | Require jig-controlled assembly; Perform 5-point stress test (per BIFMA X5.1) |
| Fabric Pilling or Seam Slippage | Low rub count fabric; Poor stitching tension | Specify minimum 30,000 double rubs; Conduct seam strength test (≥80N per ASTM D434) |
| Hardware Misalignment | Poor drilling precision; Subpar jigging | Require CNC machining logs; Conduct in-line QC checks at 20%, 50%, 80% production stages |
| Off-Gassing / VOC Emissions | Use of solvent-based finishes or adhesives | Mandate low-VOC materials; Require third-party SGS or TÜV emissions testing (ISO 16000) |
4. Recommended Sourcing Best Practices
- Pre-Production Audit: Conduct factory assessment focusing on material traceability, QC processes, and certification validity.
- Sample Approval Process: Require signed-off PPS (Pre-Production Sample) and TOP (Top of Production) samples.
- In-Line Inspection: Schedule 3rd-party QC audit at 30–50% production completion.
- Final Random Inspection (FRI): Perform AQL 2.5 / 4.0 (per ISO 2859-1) before shipment.
- Labeling & Packaging Compliance: Ensure bilingual labeling (destination language + English), ISTA 3A packaging validation.
Prepared by:
SourcifyChina – Senior Sourcing Consultants
February 2026 | Confidential – For B2B Procurement Use Only
Cost Analysis & OEM/ODM Strategies
SourcifyChina Sourcing Report 2026: Strategic Guide to China Furniture Wholesale Market
Prepared for Global Procurement Managers | Q1 2026 Forecast
Executive Summary
China remains the dominant global hub for furniture manufacturing (72% of global export value), but evolving cost structures, compliance demands, and strategic labeling models require nuanced procurement strategies. This report details actionable insights for optimizing OEM/ODM partnerships, cost allocation, and label selection in 2026. Key trends include rising material volatility (driven by EU/US sustainability regulations), automation-driven labor efficiency, and private label differentiation as critical success factors.
White Label vs. Private Label: Strategic Implications
| Model | Definition | Best For | Lead Time | MOQ Flexibility | Brand Control |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| White Label | Generic product with buyer’s logo/branding. Minimal design input. Supplier owns specs. | Entry-market brands, urgent replenishment, commoditized items (e.g., basic office chairs) | 45-60 days | High (as low as 300 units) | Low (limited to packaging) |
| Private Label | Customized product developed to buyer’s specs (materials, dimensions, features). IP owned by buyer. | Premium brands, USP-driven products (e.g., ergonomic sofas, sustainable dining sets) | 90-120 days | Moderate (min. 500 units) | High (full product control) |
Strategic Recommendation: Use white label for 20-30% of SKUs (fast turnover items); allocate 70-80% of sourcing budget to private label for margin protection and brand defensibility. Avoid white label for complex/large items (e.g., sectionals) due to quality variability.
2026 Manufacturing Cost Breakdown (Mid-Range Wooden Dining Table Example)
All figures in USD per unit. Based on FOB Shenzhen. 2026 estimates include 5.8% avg. YOY cost inflation.
| Cost Component | Description | % of Total Cost | 2026 Cost (MOQ: 1,000 units) | Key 2026 Drivers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Materials | Solid wood (e.g., acacia), hardware, finishes | 58% | $82.50 | ↑ 7.2% (FSC-certified wood premiums, VOC-compliant finishes) |
| Labor | Production, QC, assembly | 22% | $31.20 | ↑ 3.1% (offset by 15% automation gains in cutting/sanding) |
| Packaging | Custom cartons, foam inserts, palletizing | 12% | $17.00 | ↑ 9.5% (anti-damage requirements for EU/US, recycled content mandates) |
| Overhead | Tooling, compliance, supplier margin | 8% | $11.30 | ↑ 4.0% (CBAM carbon costs, ERP integration) |
| TOTAL | 100% | $142.00 |
Critical Note: Material costs now represent 55-65% of total for wood/metal items (vs. 50% in 2023) due to regulatory pressures. Bamboo/rattan shows 12-18% cost advantage over solid wood for comparable durability.
Estimated Price Tiers by MOQ (Wooden Dining Table, 75″x36″)
All prices FOB China. Based on 2026 Q1 supplier benchmarks from Foshan/Dongguan hubs.
| MOQ | Unit Price (USD) | Total Cost (USD) | Cost per Unit vs. 1k MOQ | Supplier Viability | Procurement Risk |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 500 units | $168.50 | $84,250 | +18.7% | Limited (only Tier-2 suppliers) | High (quality drift, 30% rework rate) |
| 1,000 units | $142.00 | $142,000 | Baseline | High (all Tier-1/2) | Moderate |
| 5,000 units | $124.30 | $621,500 | -12.5% | High (Tier-1 preferred) | Low (but inventory risk ↑) |
MOQ Strategy Guide:
– 500 units: Only viable for urgent spot buys or testing new designs. Expect 15-20% higher defect rates.
– 1,000 units: Optimal balance for most brands. Enables supplier investment in custom tooling without excessive inventory.
– 5,000 units: Requires 180-day sales forecast accuracy. Only pursue if:
✓ Storage/logistics costs < $8/unit saved
✓ Contract includes demand-pull clauses (e.g., 30% upfront, 70% on shipment)
SourcifyChina Action Plan for 2026
- Audit Material Compliance: Verify FSC/PEFC certification at mill level – 38% of “sustainable” claims fail traceability checks.
- Negotiate Labor Clauses: Lock in automation savings via productivity-linked pricing (e.g., 2% discount for <5% defect rate).
- Private Label Safeguards:
- Require 3D renderings + material samples before tooling deposit.
- Insist on dual QC checkpoints (30% & 100% production).
- MOQ Optimization: Split large orders across 2 suppliers (e.g., 2.5k units each) to mitigate disruption risk without sacrificing volume pricing.
“In 2026, furniture sourcing success hinges on treating suppliers as innovation partners – not just cost centers. Private label with embedded sustainability is the only path to >40% gross margins.”
— SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Unit
Data Sources: China Furniture Association (CFA), UN Comtrade 2025, SourcifyChina Supplier Audit Database (Q4 2025). All estimates exclude freight, tariffs, and buyer-side logistics.
© 2026 SourcifyChina. Confidential – Prepared Exclusively for Client Procurement Teams.
How to Verify Real Manufacturers
SourcifyChina – Professional B2B Sourcing Report 2026
Subject: Critical Steps to Verify a Manufacturer in the China Furniture Wholesale Market
Prepared For: Global Procurement Managers
Date: January 2026
Author: Senior Sourcing Consultant, SourcifyChina
Executive Summary
The China furniture wholesale market remains a cornerstone of global furniture supply chains, offering competitive pricing, diverse product ranges, and scalable manufacturing capabilities. However, sourcing directly from China requires due diligence to avoid misrepresentation, quality inconsistencies, and supply chain disruptions. This report outlines a structured verification process to distinguish between trading companies and actual factories, identify red flags, and ensure supplier reliability.
1. Critical Steps to Verify a Manufacturer
| Step | Action | Purpose | Recommended Tools/Methods |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1.1 | Request Business License & Factory Registration | Confirm legal registration under China’s State Administration for Market Regulation (SAMR) | Verify Unified Social Credit Code (USCC) via National Enterprise Credit Information Publicity System |
| 1.2 | Conduct On-Site or Virtual Factory Audit | Validate physical production capacity, equipment, and workforce | Arrange third-party inspection (e.g., SGS, TÜV) or use SourcifyChina’s audit protocol with live video tour |
| 1.3 | Review Production Equipment & Workflow | Assess technological capability and process maturity | Confirm presence of CNC machines, sanding lines, painting booths, and quality control stations |
| 1.4 | Request MOQ, Lead Time, and Pricing Breakdown | Identify scalability and transparency | Compare quotes across 3–5 suppliers; verify if pricing includes materials, labor, packaging, and export fees |
| 1.5 | Check Export History & Certifications | Validate international compliance and experience | Request export licenses, ISO 9001, FSC, CARB, or BIFMA certifications; verify past shipments via bill of lading (BOL) data |
| 1.6 | Perform Sample Evaluation | Test quality, craftsmanship, and material compliance | Order pre-production samples; conduct lab testing for durability, VOC emissions, and structural integrity |
| 1.7 | Verify Supply Chain Transparency | Ensure traceability of raw materials (e.g., timber, fabric) | Request supplier lists for wood, foam, and hardware; confirm FSC or PEFC chain-of-custody documentation |
2. How to Distinguish Between a Trading Company and a Factory
| Indicator | Factory (Manufacturer) | Trading Company | Verification Method |
|---|---|---|---|
| Facility Ownership | Owns production facility with machinery and assembly lines | No production floor; office-only setup | On-site or virtual factory audit |
| Workforce | Employs in-house engineers, technicians, and line workers | Staff focused on sales, logistics, and coordination | Observe employee roles during visit |
| Production Control | Manages all stages: cutting, assembly, finishing, QC | Outsourced production; limited control over process | Ask for workflow documentation and QC reports |
| Pricing Structure | Lower margins; direct cost control | Higher margins; may include markup from multiple suppliers | Request itemized cost breakdown |
| Customization Capability | Offers OEM/ODM services with mold/tooling support | Limited customization; reliant on factory partners | Inquire about tooling lead time and design input |
| Communication | Technical team available for engineering discussions | Sales reps handle all communication | Engage with production manager or plant supervisor |
Note: Some integrated suppliers operate as hybrid models (own factory + trading arm). Transparency is key—require disclosure of production ownership.
3. Red Flags to Avoid
| Red Flag | Risk | Mitigation Strategy |
|---|---|---|
| Unwillingness to provide factory address or live video tour | High likelihood of being a trading company or fraudulent entity | Require verified address and schedule unannounced audit |
| Generic or stock photos on website/profile | Misrepresentation of capabilities | Demand real-time photos/videos of current production |
| No verifiable export history | Limited experience with international standards or logistics | Request BOLs, commercial invoices, or customer references |
| Pressure for large upfront payments (>50%) | Cash flow risk; potential scam | Use secure payment terms (e.g., 30% deposit, 70% against BL copy) |
| Inconsistent communication or delayed responses | Poor operational management | Set response time benchmarks; assess professionalism |
| Lack of product-specific certifications | Compliance risk in EU/US markets | Require test reports for fire safety, formaldehyde, and structural load |
| Unrealistically low pricing | Use of substandard materials or labor violations | Benchmark against industry averages; verify material specs |
4. Recommended Best Practices
- Use Third-Party Verification: Engage independent inspectors for pre-shipment and during production (DUPRO) checks.
- Leverage Digital Tools: Utilize platforms like Alibaba’s Trade Assurance, but validate beyond platform claims.
- Establish Long-Term Contracts with KPIs: Include quality, on-time delivery, and communication SLAs.
- Visit the Factory Annually: Build trust and monitor continuous improvement.
- Engage Legal Counsel: Draft supplier agreements with IP protection, liability clauses, and audit rights.
Conclusion
Successfully sourcing from the China furniture wholesale market hinges on rigorous supplier verification. Distinguishing between factories and trading companies ensures better cost control, quality oversight, and supply chain resilience. Procurement managers who implement structured due diligence reduce risk, enhance compliance, and build sustainable partnerships.
SourcifyChina Recommendation: Prioritize transparency, invest in audits, and build relationships with manufacturers—not just suppliers.
Prepared by:
Senior Sourcing Consultant
SourcifyChina
www.sourcifychina.com
Empowering Global Procurement with Verified Chinese Manufacturing Partnerships
Get the Verified Supplier List
SourcifyChina Sourcing Report 2026: Strategic Advantage in China Furniture Procurement
Executive Summary
Global furniture procurement faces escalating complexity in 2026: supply chain fragmentation, rising compliance risks (EU EUDR, US Uyghur Forced Labor Prevention Act), and 68% of buyers reporting 3+ months wasted on unreliable supplier vetting (SourcifyChina 2025 Global Sourcing Index). SourcifyChina’s Verified Pro List eliminates these friction points, delivering pre-qualified, audit-backed manufacturers ready for immediate engagement.
Why the Verified Pro List Saves Critical Time & Mitigates Risk
Traditional sourcing for China furniture wholesale requires navigating 12–18 months of operational hazards. Our Pro List delivers turnkey efficiency:
| Process Stage | Traditional Sourcing (Hours) | SourcifyChina Pro List (Hours) | Time Saved | Risk Reduction |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Supplier Identification | 120+ | 8 | 93% | Eliminates 87% of fake factories (2025 audit data) |
| Quality/Compliance Audit | 200+ (3rd-party costs) | 0 (Pre-verified) | 100% | All factories pass ISO 9001 + EU REACH testing |
| MOQ/Negotiation | 85+ | 22 | 74% | Guaranteed ≤$5k MOQ for 92% of Pro List partners |
| Logistics Coordination | 60+ | 15 | 75% | Dedicated freight partners with 99.2% on-time delivery |
| TOTAL | 465+ | 45 | 90% | $220k+ avg. saved per $1M order |
Data Source: SourcifyChina 2025 Client Analytics (217 procurement teams across 38 countries)
The 2026 Procurement Imperative
With furniture tariffs rising 12.3% YoY in key markets (World Trade Organization Q1 2026) and 41% of buyers experiencing shipment delays due to non-compliant suppliers, speed-to-market is now a revenue differentiator. Our Pro List:
– ✅ Pre-vetted for 2026 regulations: All suppliers certified for EU CBAM, US EPA formaldehyde limits, and full material traceability.
– ✅ Real-time capacity tracking: Avoid 2025’s 57-day average production delays via live factory dashboards.
– ✅ Dedicated Sourcing Consultants: Bilingual experts embedded in Foshan, Shunde, and Xiamen hubs.
Your Strategic Next Step
Stop subsidizing inefficiency. Every hour spent on unverified supplier screening is a direct cost to your P&L. SourcifyChina’s Pro List delivers:
🔹 72-hour supplier match guarantee (vs. industry avg. 8+ weeks)
🔹 0% risk on first order (we cover quality/rework costs)
🔹 15% avg. landed cost reduction through consolidated logistics
Act before Q3 2026 capacity locks:
👉 Email now: [email protected]
Subject line: “Pro List Access – [Your Company Name]” for priority onboarding
👉 WhatsApp instantly: +86 159 5127 6160
(Scan QR below for direct chat)
Your procurement team will receive:
1. Customized Pro List report (10+ pre-qualified suppliers) within 24 hours
2. Live factory tour access via SourcifyChina’s VR platform
3. Q3 2026 pricing locked until December 31, 2026
“SourcifyChina cut our sourcing cycle from 5 months to 11 days. We’ve renewed contracts for 3 consecutive years because their Pro List is the only platform that guarantees compliance without slowing innovation.”
— Procurement Director, Top 3 EU Furniture Retailer (2025 Client)
SourcifyChina | Your Objective Partner in China Sourcing Since 2018
Data-Driven. Risk-Averse. Contractually Guaranteed.
© 2026 SourcifyChina. All rights reserved. | www.sourcifychina.com
🧮 Landed Cost Calculator
Estimate your total import cost from China.
