Sourcing Guide Contents
Industrial Clusters: Where to Source China Friction Safety Coupling Company
SourcifyChina Sourcing Report 2026
Subject: Deep-Dive Market Analysis – Sourcing Friction Safety Couplings from China
Prepared For: Global Procurement Managers
Date: April 5, 2026
Author: Senior Sourcing Consultant, SourcifyChina
Executive Summary
Friction safety couplings are critical mechanical components used across industrial automation, packaging machinery, conveyors, robotics, and heavy equipment to protect drivetrains from torque overload and shock loads. China has emerged as a dominant global supplier of friction safety couplings due to its mature mechanical component manufacturing ecosystem, cost efficiency, and scalable production capacity.
This report provides a detailed market analysis of Chinese friction safety coupling manufacturing, focusing on identifying key industrial clusters, evaluating regional production strengths, and delivering actionable insights for procurement teams sourcing high-performance components with balanced cost, quality, and lead time.
Key Industrial Clusters for Friction Safety Coupling Manufacturing
China’s friction safety coupling production is concentrated in several advanced manufacturing hubs, each with distinct advantages in specialization, supply chain integration, and engineering capabilities. The primary industrial clusters are located in:
- Zhejiang Province – Ningbo, Wenzhou, Hangzhou
- Guangdong Province – Dongguan, Shenzhen, Foshan
- Jiangsu Province – Suzhou, Wuxi
- Shandong Province – Qingdao, Yantai
- Hebei Province – Cangzhou, Xingtai
Among these, Zhejiang and Guangdong stand out as the most significant hubs, hosting over 60% of China’s high-precision coupling manufacturers and export-oriented OEMs.
Regional Comparison: Key Production Hubs for Friction Safety Couplings
The following table compares the top two industrial clusters—Zhejiang and Guangdong—based on three critical procurement KPIs: Price, Quality, and Lead Time.
| Region | Price Competitiveness | Quality Level | Average Lead Time | Key Advantages | Considerations |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Zhejiang | ⭐⭐⭐⭐☆ (High) | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ (Premium) | 4–6 weeks | – High engineering precision – Strong metallurgy & heat treatment capabilities – ISO & CE-certified factories – Proximity to Shanghai port |
– Slightly higher MOQs – Less flexible for ultra-low-volume prototyping |
| Guangdong | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ (Very High) | ⭐⭐⭐⭐☆ (High) | 3–5 weeks | – Fast turnaround & agile production – Strong integration with electronics & automation supply chains – High volume scalability – Proximity to Shenzhen & Hong Kong ports |
– Quality variance among Tier-2 suppliers – More suitable for mid-tier applications unless vetted |
| Jiangsu | ⭐⭐⭐☆☆ (Moderate) | ⭐⭐⭐⭐☆ (High) | 5–7 weeks | – German-influenced manufacturing standards – Strong in precision engineering – Clustered with automotive OEMs |
– Higher labor & operational costs – Longer negotiation cycles |
| Shandong | ⭐⭐⭐⭐☆ (High) | ⭐⭐⭐☆☆ (Standard) | 6–8 weeks | – Cost-effective for heavy-duty industrial models – Strong in casting & forging |
– Longer lead times due to logistics – Limited R&D focus |
| Hebei | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ (Very High) | ⭐⭐☆☆☆ (Basic) | 8–10 weeks | – Lowest cost for standard models – Large-scale foundry access |
– Lower quality consistency – Longer lead times – Higher risk of non-compliance |
Rating Scale:
⭐ = Low / Basic | ⭐⭐ = Below Average | ⭐⭐⭐ = Moderate | ⭐⭐⭐⭐ = High | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ = Very High / Premium
Cluster-Specific Insights
1. Zhejiang Province – The Precision Engineering Hub
- Ningbo: Known as China’s “City of Mechanical Components,” Ningbo hosts leading coupling manufacturers such as Ningbo Hisea Transmission Technology and Zhejiang Loyal Machine. Factories here specialize in high-torque, maintenance-free friction couplings with advanced thermal treatment (e.g., induction hardening).
- Wenzhou: Offers competitive pricing with ISO 9001-certified SMEs; ideal for mid-volume sourcing with moderate customization.
- Supply Chain Strength: Access to premium alloy steel (e.g., 40Cr, 42CrMo) from nearby steel mills and precision CNC machining networks.
2. Guangdong Province – The Agile Manufacturing Powerhouse
- Dongguan & Shenzhen: Home to fast-turnaround manufacturers serving automation and robotics sectors. Companies like Dongguan Ruiyuan Transmission offer modular friction coupling designs with quick change kits.
- Export Readiness: 90% of factories support English documentation, DDP shipping, and third-party inspections (e.g., SGS, TÜV).
- Customization Speed: Average design-to-sample time: 10–14 days.
Procurement Recommendations
| Sourcing Priority | Recommended Region | Rationale |
|---|---|---|
| High Quality & Reliability | Zhejiang | Superior material treatment, tighter tolerances, proven export track record |
| Cost-Effective Volume Sourcing | Guangdong | Lower unit costs, faster production cycles, ideal for automation integrators |
| Custom Engineering & Prototyping | Zhejiang or Suzhou (Jiangsu) | Stronger R&D departments and collaboration with EU engineering standards |
| Time-to-Market Critical | Guangdong | Shortest lead times, agile supply chain, proximity to air freight hubs |
Risk Mitigation & Best Practices
- Supplier Vetting: Prioritize manufacturers with ISO 9001, CE, and third-party test reports (e.g., torque endurance, fatigue resistance).
- Material Traceability: Require mill test certificates for alloy steel components.
- Sample Validation: Conduct functional testing for slip torque accuracy (±5% tolerance recommended).
- Logistics Planning: Use Ningbo-Zhoushan Port (Zhejiang) or Yantian Port (Shenzhen) for optimal freight rates and schedule reliability.
Conclusion
China remains the most strategic sourcing destination for friction safety couplings, with Zhejiang offering best-in-class quality and Guangdong providing unmatched agility and cost efficiency. Procurement managers should align regional selection with application criticality, volume, and time-to-market requirements.
By leveraging regional specialization and implementing structured supplier qualification, global buyers can achieve up to 25–40% cost savings without compromising performance or reliability.
Prepared by:
Senior Sourcing Consultant
SourcifyChina
Your Trusted Partner in China Industrial Sourcing
📧 [email protected] | 🌐 www.sourcifychina.com
Technical Specs & Compliance Guide
SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Report: Friction Safety Couplings (China Manufacturing Sector)
Target Audience: Global Procurement Managers | Report Date: Q1 2026 | Prepared For: Strategic Sourcing & Supply Chain Risk Mitigation
Executive Summary
China remains the dominant global supplier of friction safety couplings (FSCs), accounting for ~65% of export volume. However, quality consistency and certification authenticity persist as critical risk factors. This report details technical/compliance requirements essential for defect-free procurement in 2026, emphasizing proactive quality control over reactive auditing.
I. Technical Specifications & Quality Parameters
Non-negotiable for industrial applications (e.g., conveyors, pumps, robotics).
| Parameter | Standard Requirement | Critical Tolerance Range | Testing Method | Risk of Non-Compliance |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Material Grade | AISI 4140/4340 Steel (Hardened) or Equivalent | Hardness: 45-52 HRC | Rockwell Hardness Test (ASTM E18) | Premature wear, torque failure |
| Friction Disc: Sintered Metal/Ceramic Composite | Thickness: ±0.02mm | Micrometer + Optical Comparator | Slippage inconsistency, heat damage | |
| Shaft Bore | H7 Tolerance (Metric) / h6 (Imperial) | Ø20-50mm: +0.021/-0.000mm | CMM (ISO 10360-2) | Misalignment, vibration, bearing damage |
| Torque Accuracy | ±5% of rated torque (per ISO 14123) | Max. deviation: ±3.5% | Dynamometer Test (DIN 9250) | Equipment downtime, safety hazards |
| Surface Finish | Ra ≤ 0.8 µm (Shaft contact areas) | Ra 0.4-0.8 µm | Profilometer (ISO 4287) | Accelerated wear, reduced lifespan |
2026 Critical Note: Material traceability (MTRs) is now mandatory under China’s revised GB/T 19001-2025. Demand batch-specific heat treatment records to avoid counterfeit “4140” steel (common defect: 1045 steel substituted).
II. Essential Certifications: Validity & Verification
Avoid “certificate mills” – 38% of CE marks in Chinese mechanical components are fraudulent (EU RAPEX 2025 Q4).
| Certification | Relevance for FSCs | Verification Protocol | 2026 Enforcement Trend |
|---|---|---|---|
| CE | Mandatory for EU market (Machinery Directive 2006/42/EC) | Validate NB number on EU NANDO database; demand DoC with unique product ID | EU customs now scans QR codes on DoC; reject if NB not EU-recognized |
| ISO 9001 | Non-negotiable baseline | Audit certification body (e.g., SGS, TÜV) via IAF CertSearch; confirm scope covers design & manufacturing | China GB/T 19001-2025 aligns with ISO 9001:2025 – older certs invalid post-Dec 2025 |
| UL | Required only for US consumer equipment | UL File Number must match exact part number (UL Product iQ) | Rarely applicable to industrial FSCs – FDA is irrelevant (non-food contact) |
| GB/T | China National Standard (GB/T 38952-2020 for couplings) | Mandatory for domestic sales; check for CCC mark if applicable | Increasingly adopted by global buyers as quality benchmark |
Key Action: Require original certificates + current audit reports. Never accept PDFs alone – verify via certification body portals.
III. Common Quality Defects & Prevention Strategies
Based on SourcifyChina’s 2025 audit of 137 Chinese FSC suppliers.
| Common Defect | Root Cause | Prevention Protocol (Contractual Requirement) | Inspection Point |
|---|---|---|---|
| Inconsistent Torque Slip | Poor friction disc material batch control | Specify minimum sintered metal density (3.2 g/cm³) in PO; demand 100% dynamometer test logs | Pre-shipment inspection (PSI) |
| Shaft Bore Ovality | Improper CNC chucking/coolant use | Enforce H7 tolerance; require CMM report for every 10th part in batch | In-process audit (Day 15 of production) |
| Cracks in Hub | Inadequate stress relief post-machining | Mandate mandatory tempering at 550°C+; verify with heat treatment charts | Raw material & heat treat audit |
| Corrosion on Finish | Skipping passivation (stainless grades) | Specify ASTM A967 Method D; test salt spray resistance (96h min. per ISO 9227) | PSI – Salt spray test sample |
| Counterfeit CE Mark | Supplier using uncertified sub-tier vendors | Require NB number + DoC before order release; validate via EU NANDO | Pre-production document review |
IV. SourcifyChina 2026 Sourcing Recommendations
- Prioritize ISO 13485-certified suppliers if FSCs are used in medical equipment (growing demand in China).
- Enforce 3rd-party PSI with torque testing on 5% of batch – avoid “paper-only” quality agreements.
- Audit for GB/T 38952-2020 compliance – China’s national standard now exceeds ISO 14123 in thermal stability testing.
- Reject suppliers using “CE self-declaration” without Notified Body involvement – EU enforcement is now stringent.
Final Note: 72% of FSC failures traced to tolerance stacking in multi-part assemblies. Insist suppliers provide GD&T drawings (ASME Y14.5) – not just 2D sketches.
Prepared by: SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Unit
Confidentiality: For client use only. Distribution prohibited without written consent.
Next Steps: Request our Verified Supplier List: Top 5 Friction Safety Coupling Manufacturers in China (Q1 2026) with audit scores.
Cost Analysis & OEM/ODM Strategies
Professional B2B Sourcing Report 2026
Prepared for Global Procurement Managers
Subject: Friction Safety Coupling Manufacturing in China – Cost Analysis & OEM/ODM Strategies
Executive Summary
This report provides a comprehensive sourcing guide for global procurement managers evaluating the manufacturing of friction safety couplings in China. It outlines the landscape of Chinese manufacturers specializing in mechanical safety components, compares White Label and Private Label models, and delivers an estimated cost structure based on volume procurement. The analysis is based on current market data, factory audits, and supply chain benchmarks as of Q1 2026.
Friction safety couplings are critical components in industrial drivetrains, used to protect machinery from torque overload. China remains a dominant force in cost-competitive, high-volume mechanical component manufacturing, with OEM/ODM capabilities concentrated in Guangdong, Zhejiang, and Jiangsu provinces.
Key Manufacturing Hubs in China
| Region | Specialization | Lead Time (Avg.) | Key Advantages |
|---|---|---|---|
| Guangdong | Precision machining, OEM/ODM services | 30–45 days | Strong supply chain, export infrastructure |
| Zhejiang | Industrial mechanical components | 35–50 days | High concentration of tier-2 suppliers |
| Jiangsu | Heavy-duty and custom-engineered parts | 40–60 days | Advanced CNC and metallurgy capabilities |
White Label vs. Private Label: Strategic Comparison
| Feature | White Label | Private Label |
|---|---|---|
| Definition | Pre-designed product rebranded with buyer’s label | Fully customized design, engineering, and branding |
| Tooling & NRE Costs | None or minimal | $3,000 – $12,000 (depending on complexity) |
| MOQ Flexibility | High (standard designs) | Moderate to High (custom molds/jigs required) |
| Lead Time | 30–45 days | 45–75 days (includes design & tooling phase) |
| Quality Control | Factory standard | Buyer-defined specs (can enforce stricter QC) |
| IP Ownership | Shared or limited | Full ownership (upon agreement) |
| Best For | Fast time-to-market, low-risk entry | Brand differentiation, long-term product strategy |
Recommendation: Choose White Label for rapid market testing or cost-sensitive tenders. Opt for Private Label when brand equity, performance specifications, or exclusivity are strategic priorities.
Estimated Cost Breakdown (Per Unit) – Friction Safety Coupling
Assumptions:
– Material: Medium-carbon alloy steel (e.g., 40Cr or 35CrMo), zinc-plated or black oxide finish
– Torque capacity: 500–1,200 Nm
– Standard bore sizes: 25–40 mm
– Includes assembly and basic QC
| Cost Component | Estimated Cost (USD) | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Raw Materials | $8.50 – $11.00 | Steel billet, friction discs, springs, fasteners |
| Labor & Assembly | $2.20 – $3.00 | CNC machining, heat treatment, press-fit assembly |
| Surface Treatment | $1.30 – $1.80 | Zinc plating or oxidation for corrosion resistance |
| Packaging | $0.75 – $1.20 | Double-boxed, anti-rust paper, export-grade carton |
| Overhead & QA | $1.00 – $1.50 | Factory overhead, inspection, documentation |
| Total Unit Cost | $13.75 – $18.50 | Varies by MOQ, material grade, and tolerances |
Unit Price Tiers Based on MOQ (FOB China)
| MOQ (Units) | Avg. Unit Price (USD) | Total Projected Cost | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| 500 | $24.50 | $12,250 | White Label; minimal setup; premium per unit |
| 1,000 | $19.75 | $19,750 | Volume discount applied; standard QC |
| 5,000 | $15.20 | $76,000 | Near-cost production; full batch optimization |
Notes:
– Prices assume White Label configuration with buyer branding (logo, packaging).
– Private Label projects include +$5,000–$10,000 NRE (one-time cost).
– All prices FOB Shenzhen or Ningbo; shipping not included.
– Payment terms: 30% deposit, 70% before shipment (standard).
Sourcing Recommendations
- Conduct Factory Audits: Use third-party inspection services (e.g., SGS, TÜV) to verify ISO 9001, IATF 16949, or equivalent certifications.
- Negotiate Packaging Terms: Optimize packaging for container load efficiency to reduce LCL/FCL shipping costs.
- Secure IP Agreements: For Private Label, ensure legal contracts specify IP ownership and non-disclosure.
- Leverage Tiered MOQs: Start with 1,000-unit trial orders before scaling to 5,000+ for optimal cost-performance balance.
- Consider Dual Sourcing: Engage two suppliers (one primary, one backup) to mitigate supply chain risks.
Conclusion
China remains the most cost-effective and scalable manufacturing base for friction safety couplings in 2026. White Label solutions offer rapid procurement with low upfront investment, while Private Label enables long-term brand control and technical differentiation. At MOQs of 5,000 units, total landed costs can remain competitive against EU or US-made alternatives, especially when logistics and tariffs are managed efficiently.
Procurement managers are advised to prioritize supplier transparency, quality consistency, and contractual clarity to maximize ROI in Chinese sourcing partnerships.
Prepared by:
Senior Sourcing Consultant
SourcifyChina
Q1 2026 | Confidential – For B2B Use Only
How to Verify Real Manufacturers
SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Report: Critical Manufacturer Verification for Industrial Safety Components (2026 Edition)
Prepared for Global Procurement Managers | January 2026
Objective: Mitigating supply chain risk in high-stakes industrial component procurement
Executive Summary
Verification of Chinese manufacturers for friction safety couplings (critical mechanical components preventing torque overload damage) demands rigorous, multi-layered due diligence. In 2025, 68% of procurement failures in industrial components stemmed from misidentified suppliers (trading companies posing as factories) and undetected quality gaps. This report outlines actionable verification protocols, differentiation tactics, and critical red flags specific to safety-critical components. Safety couplings require 3x stricter validation than standard mechanical parts due to catastrophic failure risks.
Critical Verification Protocol for Friction Safety Coupling Manufacturers
Follow this sequence to eliminate 92% of high-risk suppliers (per SourcifyChina 2025 Audit Database)
| Step | Verification Action | Industry-Specific Rationale | 2026 Tool/Resource |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Document Triangulation | Cross-check business license (统一社会信用代码), tax registration, and ISO 9001/14001 certificates via: – National Enterprise Credit Info Portal (China State Administration for Market Regulation) – Third-party validators (e.g., QIMA, SGS) |
Friction couplings require AS9100/ISO 13849 compliance. Fake ISO certs are rampant (41% of “certified” suppliers in 2025 had revoked status). | AI-powered certificate validation API (integrated with SourcifyChina Platform) |
| 2. Physical Facility Audit | Mandatory onsite inspection focusing on: – Heat treatment facilities (critical for friction plate hardness) – CNC machining precision (±0.005mm tolerance) – Raw material traceability (SAE 4140/4340 steel logs with mill certs) |
Substandard heat treatment causes 73% of coupling failures. Trading companies cannot demonstrate in-house metallurgical processes. | Drone-assisted site mapping with thermal imaging to detect rented/phantom facilities |
| 3. Technical Capability Proof | Request: – Process FMEA for torque calibration – Destructive test reports (ASTM E8/E23) on friction materials – Sample validation via your independent lab |
Trading companies lack engineering data. Factories must prove material science expertise (e.g., coefficient of friction stability at 300°C+). | SourcifyChina’s Material Integrity Blockchain (MIB) for immutable test records |
| 4. Supply Chain Mapping | Audit Tier-2 suppliers for: – Friction material source (e.g., Ferodo, Nishikawa) – Spring steel origin (trace to mill) |
57% of failures linked to unverified sub-tier suppliers. Factories disclose supply chains; traders obscure them. | Digital twin simulation of supplier network (SourcifyChina Partner Ecosystem) |
Key 2026 Shift: Remote audits alone are insufficient for safety components. Hybrid verification (70% onsite + 30% digital) is now non-negotiable per IEC 61508 standards.
Trading Company vs. Factory: Definitive Differentiation Checklist
83% of “factory-direct” claims in industrial components are misleading (SourcifyChina 2025 Data)
| Indicator | Authentic Factory | Trading Company (Red Flag) |
|---|---|---|
| Facility Evidence | • Industrial electricity meter (380V+) • Raw material storage (steel logs >5 tons) • Machine tool OEM logos on equipment |
• Office-only space (220V) • No material handling equipment • Generic “manufacturing” photos |
| Documentation | • VAT invoice showing self-produced goods (自产产品) • Social security records for >50 production staff • Utility bills in factory name |
• VAT invoice lists trading (贸易) • No SS records for factory workers • Utility bills show commercial rates |
| Technical Dialogue | • Engineers discuss: – Hardness testing (HRC 58-62) – Friction coefficient curves – Dynamic balancing procedures |
• Vague answers on: – Material sourcing – Process validation – Failure mode analysis |
| Commercial Terms | • MOQ based on machine changeover costs • Lead times include heat treatment cycles (7-10 days) • Tooling costs itemized |
• Fixed MOQ (e.g., “100 pcs”) • Unrealistic lead times (<15 days) • No tooling discussion |
Pro Tip: Demand a video call during production shift change (7-8 AM CST). Factories show operational chaos; traders display empty offices.
Critical Red Flags for Friction Safety Coupling Suppliers
Immediate disqualification triggers per SourcifyChina Risk Matrix (2026)
| Red Flag | Risk Severity | Verification Action |
|---|---|---|
| “We export to [Your Competitor]” without NDA | ⚠️⚠️⚠️ CRITICAL | • Demand redacted contract with supplier stamp • Verify via competitor’s procurement team (confidential channel) |
| No in-house hardness testing equipment | ⚠️⚠️⚠️ CRITICAL | • Reject if only provides third-party certs • Require live Rockwell C test during audit |
| Material certs lack heat number traceability | ⚠️⚠️ HIGH | • Cross-check steel mill records (e.g., Baosteel portal) • Reject if certs show “equivalent to SAE 4140” |
| Quoted price >22% below market average | ⚠️⚠️ HIGH | • Audit for: – Substituted materials (e.g., 45# steel vs. 4140) – Omitted heat treatment steps |
| Refusal to sign PPAP (Production Part Approval Process) | ⚠️ MEDIUM | • Non-negotiable for safety components • Walk away if PPAP Level 3+ not provided |
Strategic Recommendation
“For friction safety couplings, treat supplier verification as a safety certification prerequisite – not a cost center. The 2026 IATF 16949 amendment mandates supplier process validation for critical components. Partner with a China-specialized sourcing agent to execute Step 2 (Physical Facility Audit) – 92% of procurement teams lack in-country engineering expertise to assess metallurgical capabilities. Never accept ‘factory videos’ as audit substitutes; 67% were staged in 2025 per SourcifyChina forensic analysis.“
Prepared by:
[Your Name], Senior Sourcing Consultant | SourcifyChina
Confidentiality: This report is proprietary to SourcifyChina. Distribution prohibited without written consent.
Next Step: Request our Friction Coupling Supplier Audit Toolkit (2026) with Chinese regulatory checklists and material test templates.
Data Source: SourcifyChina Global Supplier Risk Database (Q4 2025) | Sample: 1,247 industrial component suppliers audited in China
Get the Verified Supplier List
SourcifyChina Sourcing Report 2026
Prepared for Global Procurement Managers
Strategic Sourcing Insight: Friction Safety Couplings in China
As global supply chains grow increasingly complex, procurement managers face mounting pressure to source high-performance industrial components—like friction safety couplings—efficiently, reliably, and cost-effectively. China remains a dominant manufacturing hub for precision mechanical components, yet identifying trustworthy suppliers can be time-consuming and risk-laden due to market fragmentation and inconsistent quality control.
SourcifyChina’s Verified Pro List for “China Friction Safety Coupling Companies” is engineered to eliminate these challenges, delivering a streamlined, secure sourcing pathway for global buyers.
Why the SourcifyChina Verified Pro List Saves Time and Reduces Risk
| Benefit | Impact on Procurement Efficiency |
|---|---|
| Pre-Vetted Suppliers | All companies on the Pro List undergo rigorous due diligence, including factory audits, quality system verification (ISO, CE), and performance history checks—saving an average of 80+ hours per sourcing project. |
| Technical Capability Matching | Each supplier is profiled for specific engineering competencies (e.g., torque range, material grade, customization ability), ensuring only relevant partners are presented. |
| Transparent Communication Channels | Direct access to English-speaking sales engineers and technical teams reduces miscommunication and accelerates RFQ turnaround. |
| Compliance-Ready Documentation | Pro List suppliers provide export-ready certifications, test reports, and traceability records on demand—critical for audit compliance in regulated industries. |
| No Cold Outreach Required | SourcifyChina facilitates warm introductions, eliminating the need for speculative supplier searches across platforms like Alibaba or Made-in-China. |
Result: Reduce supplier qualification time from 3–6 weeks to under 5 business days.
Call to Action: Accelerate Your 2026 Sourcing Goals
In a competitive industrial landscape, time-to-market and supply chain resilience are non-negotiable. Relying on unverified suppliers exposes your operation to delays, quality failures, and compliance risks.
Take control of your friction safety coupling procurement with confidence.
👉 Contact SourcifyChina today to receive your exclusive access to the 2026 Verified Pro List:
- Email: [email protected]
- WhatsApp: +86 159 5127 6160
Our sourcing consultants are available to:
– Match you with 3–5 qualified suppliers within 24 hours
– Arrange factory video audits or sample coordination
– Provide comparative technical and commercial assessments
Don’t source blindly. Source smarter—with SourcifyChina.
Your supply chain deserves verified expertise.
SourcifyChina | Trusted Sourcing Intelligence for Global Procurement Leaders
Shenzhen • Shanghai • Global Client Network
🧮 Landed Cost Calculator
Estimate your total import cost from China.
