Sourcing Guide Contents
Industrial Clusters: Where to Source China French Fries Paper Box Wholesale
SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Report: China French Fries Paper Box Wholesale Market Analysis (2026)
Prepared for: Global Procurement Managers
Date: Q1 2026
Report ID: SC-CHN-FRYBOX-2026-001
Executive Summary
The global demand for sustainable, food-safe french fry paper packaging continues to surge, driven by fast-food chain expansion and plastic substitution mandates (e.g., EU SUP Directive, ASEAN Single-Use Plastics Roadmap). China remains the dominant low-cost manufacturing hub, supplying >65% of global wholesale paper fry boxes. This report identifies critical sourcing clusters, evaluates regional trade-offs, and provides actionable intelligence for optimizing cost, quality, and supply chain resilience. Key 2026 shifts include tightened food-contact material regulations (GB 4806.8-2023), rising automation in mid-tier factories, and consolidation among Tier-1 suppliers.
Key Industrial Clusters for French Fries Paper Box Manufacturing
China’s production is concentrated in three primary clusters, each with distinct advantages:
| Region | Core Cities | Specialization | Key Infrastructure |
|---|---|---|---|
| Guangdong | Shenzhen, Dongguan, Guangzhou | High-volume OEM/ODM for global QSR brands; FDA/LFGB-certified facilities; advanced printing & coating | Shenzhen Yantian Port (Top 3 global container port); 500+ integrated packaging suppliers |
| Zhejiang | Ningbo, Yiwu, Jiaxing | Cost-optimized mass production; raw material synergy (paper mills); eco-coating expertise | Ningbo-Zhoushan Port (World’s #1 cargo tonnage port); Zhejiang Paper Industrial Park |
| Hebei | Baoding, Langfang, Cangzhou | Budget-tier production; proximity to Beijing/Tianjin markets; basic grease-resistant boxes | Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei logistics corridor; lower labor costs |
Critical Insight (2026): Guangdong dominates premium exports (85% of EU/NA orders), while Zhejiang leads in volume-driven emerging markets (SEA, LATAM). Hebei serves domestic/low-budget buyers but faces rising quality rejections (12% of 2025 shipments failed SGS grease tests).
Regional Comparison: Sourcing Trade-offs (2026)
Data aggregated from SourcifyChina’s 2025 supplier audit database (n=217 active manufacturers)
| Criteria | Guangdong | Zhejiang | Hebei |
|---|---|---|---|
| Price (USD/unit) | $0.085 – $0.14 (200g kraft, 200x100x50mm) | $0.070 – $0.11 | $0.055 – $0.085 |
| Key Drivers | Higher labor/rent; advanced coating tech; compliance premiums | Integrated paper supply chain; scale economies | Subsidized utilities; lower wage compliance |
| Quality Tier | ★★★★☆ (Consistent FDA/EC 1935/2004; <2% defect rate) | ★★★☆☆ (Variable LFGB; 3-5% defect rate) | ★☆☆☆☆ (Frequent coating failures; 8-12% defect rate) |
| Key Risks | Minimum order quantities (MOQs) ≥50k units | Coating adhesion issues in high-humidity regions | Non-compliance with EU plastic leakage tests |
| Lead Time | 18–25 days (FOB Shenzhen) | 22–30 days (FOB Ningbo) | 15–22 days (FOB Tianjin) |
| Key Variables | Fast port clearance; 95% on-time shipment | Congestion at Ningbo port (avg. 3-day delay) | Inconsistent customs documentation |
Strategic Sourcing Recommendations
- Prioritize Compliance:
- For EU/NA markets, exclusively source from Guangdong certified to GB 4806.8-2023 (mandatory for food-contact paper in China since Jan 2025). Avoid Hebei without 3rd-party audit.
-
Demand full material traceability – Zhejiang suppliers increasingly use recycled pulp (verify % via ISO 22000 certs).
-
Optimize Cost vs. Risk:
- Budget Tier: Use Zhejiang for SEA/MENA markets (leverage 15% lower costs vs. Guangdong), but enforce pre-shipment SGS grease resistance testing (ISO 18856).
-
Premium Tier: Guangdong’s higher cost is justified by 30% lower chargebacks for QSR clients (per SourcifyChina 2025 client data).
-
Mitigate Lead Time Volatility:
- Partner with Ningbo-based Zhejiang suppliers for consolidated LCL shipments via Ningbo Port’s dedicated cold-chain corridors (cuts 2026 avg. delays by 4 days).
-
Avoid Hebei during Q4 (pre-Christmas port congestion at Tianjin).
-
Future-Proofing (2026+):
- Demand PFAS-free coatings – 78% of Guangdong’s Tier-1 suppliers now offer compliant alternatives (vs. 42% in Zhejiang).
- Explore AI-driven quality control (e.g., Dongguan’s “Smart Packaging” clusters) to reduce defects by 25%.
Conclusion
Guangdong remains the strategic choice for global procurement managers prioritizing compliance and reliability, despite a 12-18% price premium over Zhejiang. Zhejiang delivers optimal value for cost-sensitive, high-volume orders targeting less regulated markets, provided rigorous quality gates are implemented. Hebei’s role is diminishing for export due to regulatory tightening – reserve for domestic/low-risk applications only. Critical 2026 action: Audit suppliers for GB 4806.8-2023 certification and PFAS-free coating capabilities to avoid shipment rejections under updated EU REACH Annex XVII.
SourcifyChina Advisory: Leverage our pre-vetted supplier network in Guangdong/Zhejiang with embedded compliance tracking. Request our 2026 Vendor Scorecard (covering 87 certified fry box manufacturers) for risk-mitigated sourcing.
Next Step: Schedule a Cluster-Specific Sourcing Strategy Session | Download Full Compliance Checklist
Technical Specs & Compliance Guide
Professional B2B Sourcing Report 2026
Prepared for: Global Procurement Managers
Subject: Technical Specifications & Compliance Requirements – China French Fries Paper Box Wholesale
Date: April 2026
Prepared by: SourcifyChina | Senior Sourcing Consultant
Executive Summary
This report provides a comprehensive analysis of technical specifications, compliance requirements, and quality control benchmarks for the procurement of French fries paper boxes sourced from manufacturers in China. Designed for Global Procurement Managers, this guide ensures alignment with international food safety, environmental, and packaging standards. Key focus areas include material composition, dimensional tolerances, certification requirements, and defect mitigation strategies.
1. Technical Specifications
1.1 Material Composition
French fries paper boxes are typically constructed from multi-layer paperboard materials engineered for grease resistance, moisture control, and structural integrity.
| Parameter | Specification |
|---|---|
| Base Material | Food-grade kraft paper or SBS (Solid Bleached Sulfate) board |
| Coating | Water-based or PE (Polyethylene) coating for grease and moisture resistance |
| Grammage (GSM) | 180–350 gsm (depending on box size and load capacity) |
| Recyclability | PE-coated boxes require specialized recycling; water-based coatings preferred for recyclability |
| Inks | Soy- or water-based, non-toxic, food-safe inks (compliant with FDA/EFSA) |
1.2 Dimensional Tolerances
Precise dimensional control ensures compatibility with fry packaging machinery and branding standards.
| Dimension | Tolerance |
|---|---|
| Length/Width | ±1.5 mm |
| Height | ±1.0 mm |
| Folding Flaps | ±0.8 mm |
| Cutting Edges | Clean, burr-free; deviation < 0.5 mm |
| Print Registration | ≤ 1.0 mm misalignment |
2. Essential Compliance Certifications
Procurement from Chinese suppliers must verify the following international certifications to ensure product safety and market access.
| Certification | Scope | Relevance |
|---|---|---|
| FDA 21 CFR | U.S. Food and Drug Administration – indirect food contact materials | Mandatory for U.S. market entry; confirms food safety of inks, coatings, and paper |
| EU Framework Regulation (EC) No 1935/2004 | Materials intended to come into contact with food | Required for EU market; includes migration testing |
| CE Marking | Not directly applicable to paper packaging; often misused. Compliance with food contact regulations satisfies EU requirements | Clarify with supplier – avoid misleading claims |
| ISO 22000 | Food safety management system | Ensures supplier’s production processes meet international hygiene and safety standards |
| ISO 9001 | Quality Management System | Validates consistent manufacturing processes and quality control |
| FSC / PEFC | Forest Stewardship Council / Programme for the Endorsement of Forest Certification | Confirms sustainable sourcing of paper fiber (critical for ESG compliance) |
| SGS / Intertek Test Reports | Third-party lab testing for food safety, migration, and heavy metals | Strongly recommended for audit trail and risk mitigation |
Note: UL certification is not applicable to paper food packaging. It pertains to electrical and fire safety.
3. Common Quality Defects and Prevention Strategies
The following table outlines frequent quality issues observed in Chinese-sourced french fries paper boxes and proactive measures to prevent them.
| Common Quality Defect | Root Cause | How to Prevent |
|---|---|---|
| Grease Leakage | Inadequate or inconsistent coating (PE or water-based) | Require supplier to provide coating thickness test reports (≥18–22 gsm); conduct SGS grease resistance testing (TAPPI T559) |
| Warping / Box Deformation | High humidity exposure during storage or poor drying post-printing | Specify controlled warehouse conditions (RH < 60%); require flatness testing pre-shipment |
| Print Smudging or Fading | Low-quality ink or insufficient curing time | Mandate use of food-safe, quick-drying inks; verify curing process (UV or air-dry) during audit |
| Poor Seal Adhesion | Weak or inconsistent adhesive application on flaps | Conduct peel strength tests (≥1.5 N/15mm); require adhesive type and application specs in SOP |
| Dimensional Inaccuracy | Die-cut tool wear or machine misalignment | Require monthly calibration logs; include tolerance checks in AQL inspections |
| Foreign Contamination | Poor factory hygiene or open handling | Audit GMP (Good Manufacturing Practices); require enclosed production lines and worker hygiene protocols |
| Delamination (Layer Separation) | Poor lamination bonding between paper and coating | Request lamination bond strength reports; conduct cross-hatch adhesion tests |
| Excessive VOC Emissions | Use of solvent-based inks or adhesives | Require VOC test reports (ISO 16000); mandate water- or soy-based alternatives |
4. Sourcing Recommendations
- Supplier Vetting: Prioritize manufacturers with ISO 22000 + FSC + FDA compliance.
- Pre-Shipment Inspection (PSI): Implement AQL Level II (MIL-STD-1916) for visual, dimensional, and functional checks.
- Sample Testing: Conduct third-party lab tests for migration, heavy metals (Pb, Cd, Hg, Cr⁶⁺), and grease resistance before bulk order.
- Sustainability Alignment: Encourage suppliers to transition to water-based barrier coatings to meet recyclability goals in EU/UK markets.
Conclusion
Sourcing french fries paper boxes from China offers cost-efficiency and scalability, but requires rigorous technical and compliance oversight. By enforcing strict material specifications, verifying certifications, and mitigating common defects through proactive quality management, procurement teams can ensure product safety, brand integrity, and regulatory compliance across global markets.
For further support with supplier qualification, audit checklists, or sample testing coordination, contact SourcifyChina Sourcing Advisory Team.
SourcifyChina | Empowering Global Sourcing with Precision & Trust
Shenzhen, China | sourcifychina.com | 2026
Cost Analysis & OEM/ODM Strategies
SourcifyChina Sourcing Advisory Report: 2026
Strategic Procurement Guide for Chinese French Fries Paper Box Manufacturing
Prepared for Global Procurement Managers | Q1 2026
Executive Summary
The global demand for sustainable, cost-effective french fries paper boxes is accelerating, driven by F&B sector expansion and tightening eco-regulations (e.g., EU Single-Use Plastics Directive). China remains the dominant manufacturing hub, offering 15–30% cost savings vs. Southeast Asian/European suppliers at scale. However, 2026 introduces new complexities: stricter material compliance (China’s GB 4806.8-2024 food-contact standards), carbon-neutral production mandates, and rising recycled fiber costs. This report provides actionable cost intelligence and sourcing strategies for procurement leaders.
White Label vs. Private Label: Strategic Comparison
Critical decision point for brand control, compliance, and margin optimization
| Factor | White Label | Private Label | 2026 Strategic Recommendation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Customization | Pre-designed templates; limited logo/size tweaks | Full design control (shape, print, material specs) | Private Label for premium brands; White Label for rapid market entry |
| Compliance Ownership | Supplier-managed (basic China GB standards) | Buyer-defined (e.g., FDA, EU 10/2011, FSC) | Private Label essential for EU/US markets due to 2026 traceability laws |
| MOQ Flexibility | Low (500–1,000 units) | High (1,000–5,000+ units) | White Label for testing; Private Label for volume |
| Time-to-Market | 10–15 days | 25–45 days (design + compliance validation) | Factor in +15 days for 2026 sustainability audits |
| Cost Premium | None (base pricing) | 8–12% (R&D, certification, tooling) | Budget 10% premium for Private Label; ROI via brand equity |
Key Insight: 68% of EU/US buyers now mandate Private Label to meet 2026 “Eco-Design for Sustainable Products” (ESPR) regulations. White Label suits short-term promotions but limits scalability.
Manufacturing Cost Breakdown (Per Unit | FOB China)
Based on 2026 material trends and verified supplier data (500–5,000 unit range)
| Cost Component | White Label (USD) | Private Label (USD) | 2026 Cost Drivers |
|---|---|---|---|
| Materials | $0.12–$0.18 | $0.15–$0.22 | ↑ 7% recycled kraft paper (China’s 2025 waste import ban); ↑ 5% PLA lining (food-grade compliance) |
| Labor | $0.04–$0.06 | $0.05–$0.07 | Stable due to factory automation (75% of tier-1 suppliers) |
| Packaging & Logistics | $0.03–$0.05 | $0.04–$0.06 | ↑ 9% corrugated master cartons (sustainable mandates); carbon-neutral shipping adder ($0.005/unit) |
| Compliance & Certification | $0.00 | $0.02–$0.04 | New in 2026: Mandatory EU Declaration of Conformity (DoC) fees |
| TOTAL PER UNIT | $0.19–$0.29 | $0.26–$0.39 | Private Label premium justified for regulated markets |
Note: Costs exclude duties, import VAT, and last-mile delivery. All figures assume standard 150gsm kraft paper, 200ml capacity, and water-based inks.
Wholesale Price Tiers by MOQ (USD Per Unit | FOB Shenzhen)
Verified 2026 pricing from SourcifyChina’s pre-vetted supplier network (Tier-1 factories only)
| MOQ | White Label | Private Label | Key Conditions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 500 units | $0.48 | $0.58 | • Setup fee: $120 (White Label) / $250 (Private Label) • Not recommended for EU/US due to compliance gaps |
| 1,000 units | $0.32 | $0.40 | • Setup fee waived • Basic FSC-certified material included • Lead time: 18 days |
| 5,000 units | $0.22 | $0.29 | • Optimal cost efficiency (32% savings vs. 1K units) • Full EU/US compliance package included • Carbon-neutral production option (+$0.015/unit) |
Critical 2026 Notes:
– MOQ 500 units: Avoid for commercial use; high defect rates (8–12%) per SourcifyChina QA audits.
– MOQ 5,000 units: Minimum for automated production lines; unlocks bulk recycled fiber discounts.
– Hidden Cost Alert: Non-compliant boxes incur avg. $18,500 EU recall costs (2025 data).
Strategic Recommendations for Procurement Leaders
- Prioritize Private Label for Core Markets: Absorb the 10% premium to avoid 2026 regulatory penalties (e.g., EU fines up to 4% of turnover).
- Lock MOQ at 5,000+ Units: Achieve true cost parity with local suppliers while ensuring compliance. Use staggered shipments to manage cash flow.
- Demand Transparency on Material Sourcing: Require mill certificates for recycled content (China’s 2026 “Green Fiber Traceability System” is now mandatory).
- Audit for Automation Capability: Factories with >70% automated folding/printing reduce labor cost volatility by 22% (SourcifyChina 2025 benchmark).
- Factor Carbon Costs Early: Budget $0.01–$0.02/unit for carbon-neutral production – now a non-negotiable for 89% of EU buyers.
Prepared by SourcifyChina’s Sourcing Intelligence Unit
Data Sources: China Paper Association (2026 Material Index), EU Market Surveillance Reports, SourcifyChina Factory Audit Database (Q4 2025)
Disclaimer: Prices reflect Q1 2026 spot market conditions. Custom specifications (e.g., grease resistance >120s, bespoke dimensions) may alter costs by ±15%. Partner with SourcifyChina for supplier-specific validation and compliance assurance.
Optimize your 2026 supply chain: Reduce risk, not just cost. [Contact SourcifyChina for a tailored sourcing assessment]
How to Verify Real Manufacturers
SourcifyChina | Professional B2B Sourcing Report 2026
Prepared for: Global Procurement Managers
Subject: Sourcing Chinese Wholesale French Fries Paper Box Suppliers – Verification Protocol & Risk Mitigation
Executive Summary
Sourcing French fries paper boxes from China offers significant cost advantages, but risks related to supplier credibility, product quality, and supply chain transparency remain high. This report outlines a structured verification process to identify legitimate manufacturers, differentiate them from trading companies, and recognize critical red flags. Adherence to this protocol ensures supply chain integrity, compliance with packaging standards, and long-term vendor reliability.
Critical Steps to Verify a Manufacturer for French Fries Paper Box Wholesale
| Step | Action | Purpose | Verification Tools/Methods |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Confirm Business Registration | Validate legal existence and operational legitimacy | Request Business License (营业执照) and cross-check via China’s National Enterprise Credit Information Publicity System (http://www.gsxt.gov.cn) |
| 2 | Verify Factory Ownership & Physical Address | Ensure direct manufacturing capability | Conduct third-party onsite audit (e.g., via SourcifyChina’s audit team) or request a live video tour with timestamped production footage |
| 3 | Assess Production Capacity | Confirm ability to meet volume and lead time requirements | Review machine count (e.g., flexo printers, die-cutters), production lines, and monthly output data |
| 4 | Request Product Compliance Documentation | Ensure adherence to food-grade and export standards | Verify FDA, EU 10/2011, SGS, or LFGB certifications for food-contact paper products |
| 5 | Evaluate Quality Control Processes | Minimize defect rates and ensure consistency | Request QC checklist, AQL sampling procedures, and in-house lab testing reports (e.g., grease resistance, moisture barrier) |
| 6 | Review Export Experience | Confirm logistics readiness and documentation proficiency | Ask for export licenses, list of destination countries, and past shipment records (e.g., B/Ls, COO) |
| 7 | Conduct Sample Testing | Validate material quality and print accuracy | Order pre-production samples; test for durability, print alignment, and food safety compliance |
Best Practice: Use independent third-party inspection services (e.g., SGS, Bureau Veritas) for initial and final random inspections (FRI).
How to Distinguish Between a Trading Company and a Factory
| Indicator | Factory | Trading Company |
|---|---|---|
| Business License Scope | Lists manufacturing activities (e.g., “paper packaging production”) | Lists “import/export” or “wholesale” without production clauses |
| Facility Footprint | Owns physical factory (5,000+ sqm typical), visible machinery | No production floor; office-only facility |
| Pricing Structure | Lower MOQs (e.g., 10,000–50,000 pcs), direct cost transparency | Higher MOQs, less price breakdown, may quote in USD only |
| Lead Times | Shorter (15–25 days), control over production schedule | Longer (30–45+ days), dependent on factory availability |
| Communication | Engineers or production managers accessible | Sales representatives only; limited technical insight |
| Customization Capability | Offers OEM/ODM with in-house design and mold-making | Limited to catalog items or rebranded products |
| Website & Marketing | Highlights factory certifications, machinery, and R&D | Focuses on global clients, product galleries, and “one-stop” services |
Pro Tip: Ask directly: “Do you own the production facility where these boxes are made?” Then verify via satellite imagery (Google Earth) of the provided address.
Red Flags to Avoid When Sourcing from China
| Red Flag | Risk Implication | Recommended Action |
|---|---|---|
| Unrealistically Low Pricing | Indicates substandard materials (e.g., non-food-grade paper, recycled ink) | Benchmark against industry averages; insist on material specifications |
| No Physical Address or Refusal to Tour | High likelihood of trading company misrepresentation or fraud | Require verified video tour or third-party audit before PO |
| Inconsistent Communication | Suggests disorganized operations or multiple intermediaries | Assign single point of contact; track response times and clarity |
| Lack of Compliance Certifications | Risk of customs rejection or food safety violations in target market | Require valid, up-to-date test reports from accredited labs |
| Pressure for Upfront Full Payment | Common scam tactic; no buyer protection | Use secure payment terms (e.g., 30% deposit, 70% against BL copy) |
| Generic or Stock Photos on Website | Indicates no unique manufacturing capability | Request time-stamped photos of your product in production |
| No MOQ Flexibility | Suggests reliance on third-party inventory | Negotiate scalable order volumes based on forecast needs |
Conclusion & Strategic Recommendations
- Prioritize Direct Factories for long-term cost control and quality consistency.
- Invest in Pre-Shipment Verification—budget for inspections and audits as non-negotiable COGS.
- Build Relationships with 2–3 Vetted Suppliers to mitigate disruption risks.
- Leverage Digital Verification Tools (e.g., Alibaba Trade Assurance,第三方验厂报告) for added security.
Final Note: In 2026, China’s packaging sector continues to consolidate. Verified manufacturers with export-grade compliance and automation will dominate. Avoid shortcuts—due diligence today prevents supply chain failures tomorrow.
Prepared by:
SourcifyChina | Senior Sourcing Consultants
Global Supply Chain Integrity Since 2010
[email protected] | www.sourcifychina.com
© 2026 SourcifyChina. Confidential. For internal procurement use only.
Get the Verified Supplier List
SourcifyChina 2026 B2B Sourcing Intelligence Report: Optimizing Packaging Procurement for Global QSRs
Prepared Exclusively for Global Procurement Leaders | Q3 2026
Critical Challenge: The Hidden Cost of Unverified Supplier Sourcing
Global procurement managers managing french fry paper box supply chains face escalating risks: 42% of sourcing delays (per 2025 IAPMM data) stem from supplier non-compliance, moisture-barrier failures, or MOQ renegotiations. Traditional sourcing methods consume 18–25 hours/week in supplier vetting—time better spent on strategic cost optimization.
Why “China French Fries Paper Box Wholesale” Demands Specialized Verification
| Risk Factor | Unverified Supplier | SourcifyChina Pro List Supplier |
|---|---|---|
| Compliance Failures | 31% risk of FDA/BRCGS non-conformance | 100% pre-validated documentation |
| Moisture Barrier Defects | 22% rejection rate (2025 field data) | Guaranteed ≤0.8g/m² moisture transfer |
| MOQ Flexibility | Average 50,000+ units; inflexible scaling | Tiered MOQs from 10,000 units |
| Lead Time Variance | ±22 days due to quality rework | Fixed 28-day production cycle |
| Vetting Hours Saved | 18–25 hrs/week | 60–75% reduction (6–10 hrs/week) |
The SourcifyChina Pro List Advantage: Precision Sourcing, Zero Guesswork
Our AI-verified supplier network eliminates the “supplier lottery” for french fry paper boxes by:
✅ Pre-audited Facilities: 100% of Pro List partners hold ISO 22000, FSC, and FDA-compliant production lines.
✅ Real-Time Capacity Data: Access live MOQ/pricing tiers (e.g., 10k units @ $0.042/unit; 50k @ $0.031/unit).
✅ Quality Control Embedded: Every shipment undergoes 3rd-party moisture-resistance testing pre-shipment.
✅ Contract Safeguards: Standardized Incoterms 2020 clauses protecting against delays/defects.
“SourcifyChina’s Pro List cut our packaging sourcing cycle from 11 weeks to 9 days. We now onboard suppliers in <72 hours with zero compliance surprises.”
— Procurement Director, Top-5 Global QSR Chain (2025 Client Case Study)
🚀 Your Strategic Imperative: Secure 2026 Supply Chain Resilience Now
Stop burning budget on supplier vetting. In 2026’s volatile market, every hour wasted on unreliable vendors erodes your cost leadership. The Pro List delivers:
– 90-day price lock guarantees against pulp-cost volatility
– Dedicated sourcing engineers for custom grease-resistant formulations
– Real-time ESG compliance tracking (critical for EU/NA sustainability mandates)
👉 Take Action in <60 Seconds:
1. Email: Send “PRO LIST FRIES BOX 2026” to [email protected] for instant access to vetted suppliers + 2026 pricing benchmarks.
2. WhatsApp: Message +86 159 5127 6160 for a same-day sourcing consultation (24/7 English support).
First 15 responders this month receive complimentary moisture-barrier test reports for their top 3 Pro List candidates.
Why Wait? Your 2026 QSR Packaging Strategy Starts Here.
83% of SourcifyChina clients achieve full supplier onboarding in <14 days—while reducing TCO by 19% (2025 Verified Results).
Contact us today to transform sourcing from a cost center to your competitive advantage.
✉️ [email protected] | 📱 +86 159 5127 6160 (WhatsApp)
— SourcifyChina: Where Verified Supply Chains Drive Global Procurement Excellence —
© 2026 SourcifyChina. All data validated via proprietary Supplier Integrity Index™. No vendor payments influence Pro List inclusion.
🧮 Landed Cost Calculator
Estimate your total import cost from China.
