Sourcing Guide Contents
Industrial Clusters: Where to Source China French Fries Holder Wholesale
SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Report: Disposable French Fry Holders (Fast Food Packaging)
Prepared For: Global Procurement Managers | Date: Q1 2026 | Report ID: SC-FFH-2026-001
Executive Summary
The term “China French Fries Holder Wholesale” refers to disposable food containers for fast food (typically paperboard or plastic cones/cups), not the food product itself. China dominates global manufacturing of this niche fast-food packaging segment, with production concentrated in clusters specializing in disposable food packaging and injection-molded plastic goods. Key clusters are driven by raw material access, food-grade certification infrastructure, and export logistics. Critical note: There are no dedicated “french fry holder” factories; production occurs within broader disposable packaging facilities. Sourcing success hinges on identifying suppliers with food-grade certifications (FDA, EU 10/2011, LFGB) and experience in fast-food chain specifications.
Key Industrial Clusters Analysis
Production is concentrated in 3 primary clusters, each with distinct advantages:
| Production Cluster | Core Strengths | Typical Suppliers | Strategic Fit |
|---|---|---|---|
| Guangdong (Dongguan/Shenzhen) | Highest concentration of injection-molded plastic facilities; Strong food-grade certification (FDA/LFGB); Proximity to Shenzhen port; Mature supply chain for custom molds | OEMs specializing in plastic food containers (PP, PS), often with in-house mold design | High-volume orders requiring custom shapes/colors; Brands needing strict compliance (e.g., EU/US chains) |
| Zhejiang (Yiwu/Ningbo) | Dominates paperboard/pulp-based holders; Lowest base costs; Massive small-commodity ecosystem (Yiwu Market); Strong for standard cone designs | Factories focused on disposable paper food packaging; Many Alibaba “Gold Suppliers” | Budget-focused orders; Standardized paper cones; Buyers prioritizing lowest FOB prices |
| Jiangsu (Suzhou/Wuxi) | Emerging hub for sustainable/recycled materials; Stronger QC processes; Near Shanghai port; Higher focus on export compliance | Mid-sized factories with ISO 22000/BRCGS; Growing biodegradable material expertise | Brands prioritizing eco-certifications (FSC, OK Compost); Mid-to-high volume with quality focus |
Regional Comparison: Price, Quality & Lead Time
Data based on 2025 SourcifyChina supplier audits (100+ factories); Assumes 50,000 units, standard paper cone (150ml) or plastic cup (200ml)
| Metric | Guangdong (Plastic Focus) | Zhejiang (Paper Focus) | Jiangsu (Sustainable Focus) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Price (FOB USD/unit) | $0.018 – $0.025 +15-25% vs. Zhejiang (mold costs) |
$0.015 – $0.020 Lowest base cost; bulk discounts aggressive |
$0.022 – $0.030 +10-20% premium for recycled/biodegradable materials |
| Quality Tier | ★★★★☆ Consistent food-grade compliance; Tighter tolerances; Customization precision |
★★☆☆☆ Variable; Many lack direct certifications (rely on trading companies); Higher defect risk |
★★★★☆ Rigorous QC common; Strong documentation; Best for eco-specs |
| Lead Time | 25-35 days (+10-15 days for new mold development) |
18-25 days (Standard designs; high inventory) |
22-30 days (Stable for certified materials) |
| Key Risk | Higher MOQs (50k+); Mold amortization costs | Compliance gaps; Material inconsistency | Limited capacity for ultra-low-cost orders |
Critical Sourcing Insights & Recommendations
-
Material Dictates Location:
- Plastic holders? Prioritize Guangdong (Dongguan). Verify in-house mold capabilities – avoid suppliers outsourcing mold work.
- Paper holders? Target Zhejiang (Yiwu), but audit certifications onsite. Expect to pay 5-8% more for direct factory compliance vs. Alibaba listings.
- Eco-friendly? Jiangsu is optimal. Confirm specific material certifications (e.g., cornstarch content %, composting facility partnerships).
-
Avoid “French Fries Holder” Keyword Traps:
Search Alibaba using:"Disposable fry container" + FDA"Fast food paper cone" + food grade"Injection molded french fry cup" + LFGB
Filter by “Trade Assurance” and “Verified Supplier”.
-
Compliance is Non-Negotiable:
> 72% of rejected shipments (2025 EU RASFF) stemmed from undocumented food-grade compliance. Demand:- Copy of current material test reports (not just “meets FDA”)
- Factory’s own food safety certificate (BRCGS/ISO 22000 > HACCP alone)
- Batch-specific CoA for every shipment
-
Lead Time Reality Check:
- Standard designs: 20-28 days (Zhejiang fastest)
- Custom designs: +10-20 days for mold approval (Guangdong)
- Always add 7-10 days buffer for customs documentation review.
SourcifyChina Action Plan
- Shortlist: Identify 3 suppliers per cluster via SourcifyChina’s Verified Packaging Database (filter: Food Grade, Export History >2 years).
- Audit: Conduct virtual audit focusing on material traceability and compliance documentation workflow (not just certificates).
- Sample Rigor: Order 3 batches of samples (different production dates) to test consistency.
- Contract Clause: Mandate “Third-party pre-shipment inspection (SGS/BV) at buyer’s cost – rejection = 100% remake at supplier’s cost.”
Bottom Line: Guangdong leads for quality/compliance-critical orders; Zhejiang wins on price for standard paper; Jiangsu is the sustainable growth play. Success requires treating this as specialized food packaging, not a generic commodity.
Prepared by SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Unit. Data sourced from China Packaging Federation, 2025 Export Customs Records, and 127 verified factory audits. © 2026 SourcifyChina. Confidential – For Client Use Only.
Technical Specs & Compliance Guide
SourcifyChina Sourcing Report 2026
Product Category: China French Fries Holder – Wholesale Procurement Guide
Target Audience: Global Procurement Managers
Prepared by: Senior Sourcing Consultant, SourcifyChina
Date: Q1 2026
Executive Summary
This report provides a comprehensive sourcing guide for French fries holders (also known as fry boats or paper food containers) manufactured in China. Designed for global procurement professionals, it outlines key technical specifications, compliance requirements, and quality control benchmarks essential for ensuring food-safe, durable, and compliant packaging solutions. With increasing regulatory scrutiny in North America, the EU, and Oceania, adherence to material standards and food contact regulations is paramount.
Technical Specifications
| Parameter | Specification |
|---|---|
| Material Type | Food-grade grease-resistant paperboard (typically 180–260 gsm), optionally with PLA (polylactic acid) lining for compostability |
| Coating (if applicable) | Water-based or PLA coating for oil and moisture resistance; must be FDA 21 CFR 176.170 compliant |
| Dimensions (Common) | 3 oz to 16 oz (e.g., 90 mm × 60 mm × 40 mm to 180 mm × 100 mm × 50 mm) |
| Tolerance (Dimensional) | ±1.5 mm for length/width; ±1.0 mm for height; ±2° for folding angles |
| Oil/Grease Resistance | Must withstand ≥30 minutes contact with hot oil (180°C) without leakage (tested per TAPPI T559 or equivalent) |
| Stackability | Minimum 10 layers without deformation under 5 kg load |
| Print Specifications | Soy- or water-based inks only; compliant with EU 10/2011 and FDA 21 CFR 175.300 |
| Temperature Resistance | -10°C to +100°C (for short-term hot food use) |
Essential Compliance Certifications
| Certification | Jurisdiction | Purpose | Requirement Summary |
|---|---|---|---|
| FDA 21 CFR | United States | Food Contact Safety | Materials must be listed under FDA 21 CFR 176.170 (indirect food additives) |
| EU 10/2011 | European Union | Food Contact Materials (FCM) | Compliance with migration limits for plastic and paper-based materials |
| CE Marking | EU | General Product Safety | Required for food service equipment; includes traceability and safety documentation |
| ISO 22000 | Global | Food Safety Management | Validates manufacturer’s food safety processes |
| ISO 9001 | Global | Quality Management | Confirms consistent production and quality control systems |
| FSC Certification | Global | Sustainable Sourcing | Ensures paperboard comes from responsibly managed forests |
| SGS/BV/Intertek | Global | Third-Party Testing | Recommended for batch validation of material safety and performance |
Note: For compostable variants, EN 13432 (industrial compostability) and BPI Certification (North America) are highly recommended.
Common Quality Defects and Prevention Strategies
| Common Quality Defect | Root Cause | Prevention Strategy |
|---|---|---|
| Leakage under oil exposure | Inadequate grease resistance or coating defects | Source paperboard with ≥200 gsm and verified grease resistance (TAPPI T559); conduct batch oil soak tests |
| Structural collapse or splaying | Poor creasing, weak glue joints, or low GSM board | Enforce crease tolerance of ±0.5 mm; use certified food-safe hot-melt adhesives; verify board stiffness (Taber stiffness test) |
| Ink transfer or smudging | Use of non-compliant or solvent-based inks | Specify soy/water-based inks; require supplier ink compliance documentation (FDA 21 CFR 175.300) |
| Dimensional inconsistency | Poor die-cut tooling or machine calibration | Conduct first-article inspection (FAI) with calipers; audit tooling maintenance logs monthly |
| Moisture absorption in storage | Poor warehouse humidity control (>60% RH) | Require supplier to store in climate-controlled facilities; use moisture barrier packaging for export |
| Foreign contaminants (dust, metal) | Poor factory hygiene or lack of QA protocols | Mandate ISO 22000 certification; require metal detection and visual inspection pre-shipment |
| Folding misalignment | Misaligned gluing or folding mechanism | Implement automated vision inspection systems; conduct hourly line checks |
Sourcing Recommendations
- Supplier Vetting: Prioritize manufacturers with ISO 9001, ISO 22000, and FSC certifications.
- Pre-Shipment Inspection (PSI): Engage third-party inspectors (e.g., SGS, QIMA) to verify compliance with dimensional, material, and safety specs.
- Sample Testing: Request material safety data sheets (MSDS), FDA/EU compliance letters, and perform independent lab testing for migration and grease resistance.
- Sustainability Alignment: For ESG-compliant sourcing, select suppliers offering FSC-certified, PLA-lined, or compostable options.
- MOQ & Logistics: Typical MOQ: 50,000 units; FOB Shenzhen/Ningbo; lead time: 25–35 days post-approval.
Prepared by:
Senior Sourcing Consultant
SourcifyChina
Empowering Global Procurement with Verified Chinese Sourcing
Cost Analysis & OEM/ODM Strategies
SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Report: French Fries Holder Manufacturing in China (2026 Projection)
Prepared for Global Procurement Managers
Date: January 15, 2026 | Report ID: SC-FFH-2026-Q1
Executive Summary
China remains the dominant global hub for cost-competitive, high-volume production of disposable foodservice items like french fries holders, leveraging mature supply chains, food-grade material expertise, and scalable OEM/ODM infrastructure. This report provides actionable insights for procurement managers sourcing french fries holders (also termed cone holders, fry boats, or snack containers) from Chinese manufacturers. Key 2026 trends include tightened food safety compliance (GB 4806.7-2023), rising automation offsetting labor costs, and strategic differentiation between White Label and Private Label models. Critical Recommendation: Prioritize suppliers with ISO 22000/FDA compliance to mitigate regulatory risks in target markets.
White Label vs. Private Label: Strategic Comparison
Understanding these models is critical for cost control, brand positioning, and supply chain resilience.
| Criteria | White Label | Private Label | Strategic Implication for 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Definition | Generic product produced by supplier; buyer applies own branding | Fully customized design, materials, and specs per buyer’s requirements | White Label = Speed-to-market; Private Label = Brand differentiation & margin control |
| MOQ Flexibility | Low (500–1,000 units); uses existing molds/tooling | High (1,000–5,000+ units); requires new tooling | White Label ideal for testing new markets; Private Label requires volume commitment for ROI |
| Unit Cost (2026 Est.) | 15–25% higher per unit vs. Private Label at same MOQ | Lower long-term cost at scale; mold amortization | Private Label becomes cost-competitive at >1,500 units |
| Lead Time | 10–15 days (ready inventory) | 30–45 days (tooling + production) | Factor in 2026 supply chain volatility: +7–10 days buffer for customs/inspections |
| IP Protection | Supplier owns design; limited exclusivity | Buyer owns design; full legal control via NNN agreement | Non-negotiable in 2026: Use China-specific NNN agreements to prevent design leakage |
| Best For | Budget launches, promotional items, low-risk testing | Premium branding, supermarket chains, sustainability-focused portfolios | 68% of SourcifyChina clients now opt for Private Label for core SKUs (2025 client data) |
Key Insight: Private Label adoption is accelerating in 2026 due to falling CNC mold costs (↓12% YoY) and demand for eco-materials (e.g., PLA bioplastic). White Label remains viable for impulse-buy items but carries commoditization risk.
Cost Breakdown Analysis (Per Unit, FOB Shenzhen)
Based on 2026 projections for standard 200ml PP plastic holder (12cm height, 8cm base). All costs in USD.
| Cost Component | Details | 2026 Estimate | 2026 Trend Drivers |
|---|---|---|---|
| Materials | Food-grade PP (polypropylene); 0.8–1.2g/unit. Includes colorant (Pantone-matched for PL). | $0.32–$0.45 | ↑ 4% YoY due to petrochemical volatility; +$0.08–$0.12 premium for PLA bioplastic (EU/NA demand) |
| Labor | Automated injection molding (85% automation); manual QC/packaging. | $0.20–$0.28 | ↓ 2% YoY due to robotics; offset by 5% wage inflation in Guangdong manufacturing hubs |
| Packaging | Inner: Polybag (0.5g); Outer: 50-unit master carton (300gsm cardboard). | $0.15–$0.22 | Cardboard ↑ 7% (sustainability compliance); polybags ↓ 3% (recycled content scale) |
| Tooling (One-time) | Injection mold (1–8 cavities); 3D design validation. | $800–$2,200 | ↓ 10% vs. 2024 due to AI-optimized mold design; amortized over MOQ |
| Compliance | FDA 21 CFR 177.1520, EU 10/2011, GB 4806.7-2023 testing/certificates. | $0.03–$0.06 | Mandatory in 2026; +$0.02 for BRCGS audit (retail requirement) |
| TOTAL PER UNIT | Excluding tooling amortization | $0.70–$1.01 | ↓ 1.5% YoY net (automation gains > material inflation) |
Critical Note: Tooling costs are amortized into unit pricing. A $1,500 mold at 5,000 MOQ adds $0.30/unit; at 500 MOQ, it adds $3.00/unit – making low-MOQ orders economically unviable without White Label.
MOQ-Based Price Tier Analysis (2026 Projection)
All prices FOB Shenzhen, standard PP material, 200ml holder, includes compliance certs. Excludes shipping/insurance.
| MOQ Tier | Unit Price Range | Effective Tooling Cost/Unit | Total Project Cost | Strategic Recommendation |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 500 units | $1.85 – $2.30 | $1.60 – $2.00 | $925 – $1,150 | Avoid for core SKUs. Only for urgent samples/promos. High risk of supplier quality corners. |
| 1,000 units | $1.45 – $1.75 | $0.75 – $1.00 | $1,450 – $1,750 | White Label sweet spot. Test market fit; minimal customization. |
| 5,000 units | $1.15 – $1.35 | $0.15 – $0.25 | $5,750 – $6,750 | Private Label optimum. Full customization ROI achieved. Ideal for annual contracts. |
Key Price Drivers by Tier:
- 500 units: Tooling dominates cost (85%+). Suppliers often reject orders <500 due to 2026 minimum operational costs.
- 1,000 units: Balance of flexibility and cost. White Label leverages existing inventory; Private Label requires mold commitment.
- 5,000 units: Automation efficiency peaks. Per-unit costs approach theoretical minimum; ideal for supermarket private labels.
2026 Warning: Suppliers quoting <$1.10 at 5,000 MOQ likely use non-food-grade recycled PP (violates EU/US regulations). Always demand material traceability certificates.
Actionable Sourcing Recommendations
- Prioritize Compliance First: Verify supplier’s GB 4806.7-2023 certification before sample requests. Non-compliant products face 100% customs rejection in EU/US (2026 enforcement).
- Tooling Ownership Clause: For Private Label, contractually stipulate mold ownership transfer upon final payment. Prevents supplier lock-in.
- MOQ Strategy:
- Start with 1,000-unit White Label order to validate demand.
- Lock in 5,000-unit Private Label contract with 30% upfront payment to secure 2026 capacity (Chinese New Year 2026 production freeze: Jan 28–Feb 15).
- Sustainability Premium: Budget +$0.15/unit for PLA bioplastic holders (2026 EU single-use plastics directive compliance).
- Quality Control: Mandate 3rd-party AQL 1.0 inspections (cost: $250–$400/order). 22% of 2025 SourcifyChina orders failed initial QC due to inconsistent wall thickness.
Prepared by:
[Your Name], Senior Sourcing Consultant
SourcifyChina | China Sourcing, Simplified
Verified by SourcifyChina’s 2026 Supplier Integrity Database (SID v4.1)
Disclaimer: Prices reflect Q1 2026 projections based on SourcifyChina’s supplier network data, petrochemical futures, and Chinese manufacturing indices. Actual costs may vary ±8% due to FX fluctuations (USD/CNY) or geo-political events. Always request formal quotes with Incoterms® 2020 clarity.
Next Step: Contact SourcifyChina for a free supplier shortlist with pre-vetted french fries holder manufacturers (ISO 22000, FDA-compliant, 5,000+ MOQ capacity).
How to Verify Real Manufacturers
SourcifyChina Sourcing Report 2026
Subject: Critical Steps to Verify a Manufacturer for China French Fries Holder Wholesale
Prepared For: Global Procurement Managers
Date: January 2026
Author: Senior Sourcing Consultant, SourcifyChina
Executive Summary
Sourcing French fries holders (also known as fry cones, paper sleeves, or fast food packaging) from China offers significant cost advantages but carries inherent supply chain risks. This report outlines a structured due diligence process to verify authentic manufacturers, distinguish them from trading companies, and identify critical red flags. Adherence to these steps ensures product quality, supply reliability, and intellectual property protection.
1. Critical Steps to Verify a Manufacturer
| Step | Action Required | Purpose | Verification Tools/Methods |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1.1 | Confirm Business License & Registration | Validate legal entity status and scope of operations | Request copy of Chinese Business License; verify via State Administration for Market Regulation (SAMR) online portal |
| 1.2 | Conduct Factory Audit (On-site or 3rd Party) | Physically validate production capacity and quality control | Hire a third-party inspection firm (e.g., SGS, Bureau Veritas) or conduct virtual/onsite audit using checklists |
| 1.3 | Review Production Equipment & Workflow | Assess capability to produce fry holders at scale | Verify presence of paper forming machines, die-cutters, printing systems, and packaging lines |
| 1.4 | Request Sample with Production Trail | Confirm consistency between sample and mass production | Require sample with batch number; request video of sample production process |
| 1.5 | Audit Quality Control (QC) Procedures | Ensure compliance with international standards | Review QC documentation, AQL sampling plans, and defect tracking systems |
| 1.6 | Validate Export History & Client References | Confirm reliability and experience with global buyers | Request export invoices (redacted), shipping records, and contact 2–3 past clients |
| 1.7 | Verify Certifications | Ensure food-grade and environmental compliance | Check for ISO 9001, ISO 22000, FDA, LFGB, FSC, or BRCGS certifications |
2. How to Distinguish Between a Trading Company and a Factory
| Indicator | Factory (Recommended) | Trading Company (Use with Caution) |
|---|---|---|
| Facility Ownership | Owns and operates manufacturing plant; can provide factory address and tour | No production facility; may refuse on-site visits or redirect to partner factory |
| Pricing Structure | Provides detailed cost breakdown (material, labor, overhead) | Offers fixed price with limited transparency; may not explain cost drivers |
| Lead Times | Direct control over production schedule; realistic timelines | Dependent on third-party factories; longer or inconsistent lead times |
| Customization Capability | Can modify molds, sizes, inks, and materials in-house | Limited flexibility; requires factory approval for changes |
| Staff Expertise | Engineers and production managers available for technical discussions | Sales-focused staff; limited technical knowledge of manufacturing |
| Minimum Order Quantity (MOQ) | MOQ based on machine setup and raw material rolls (e.g., 50k–100k units) | Often higher MOQs due to markup and logistics buffering |
| Website & Marketing | Highlights production lines, machinery, and R&D | Focuses on product catalog, global shipping, and “one-stop sourcing” |
✅ Best Practice: Prioritize suppliers who allow unannounced or scheduled factory audits and provide real-time production updates.
3. Red Flags to Avoid
| Red Flag | Risk Implication | Recommended Action |
|---|---|---|
| Unwillingness to conduct a factory video call or onsite audit | High probability of being a trading company or fraudulent entity | Disqualify supplier unless third-party audit is commissioned |
| No verifiable certifications for food contact materials | Risk of non-compliance with EU, US, or AU food safety regulations | Require valid FDA, LFGB, or equivalent documentation |
| Prices significantly below market average | Indicates substandard materials (e.g., recycled paper with ink migration risk) or hidden costs | Conduct material testing and request full cost breakdown |
| Generic or stock images on website/profile | Suggests lack of original production capability | Request time-stamped photos of actual production lines |
| Poor English communication or delayed responses | Indicates weak project management and potential miscommunication | Assign a bilingual sourcing agent or use verified platforms |
| Requests full payment upfront (100% TT) | High fraud risk; no buyer protection | Use secure payment terms (e.g., 30% deposit, 70% against BL copy) |
| No experience with your target market (e.g., EU, North America) | Risk of non-compliance with regional packaging regulations | Validate past shipments to your region via reference checks |
4. Recommended Sourcing Strategy (2026)
- Shortlist 5–7 suppliers via Alibaba Gold Suppliers, Made-in-China, or industry trade shows (e.g., China International Packaging Exhibition).
- Pre-screen using video audits and document verification.
- Order samples from top 3 candidates; conduct lab testing for food safety and durability.
- Conduct on-site audit or third-party inspection before PO placement.
- Start with a trial order (30–50% of intended volume) to evaluate performance.
- Scale up only after successful delivery, QC approval, and compliance validation.
Conclusion
Verifying a genuine French fries holder manufacturer in China requires proactive due diligence. Factories offer better pricing, control, and scalability, while trading companies introduce opacity and margin layers. By following the verification steps, distinguishing factory vs. trader indicators, and avoiding red flags, procurement managers can build a resilient, compliant, and cost-effective supply chain.
Prepared by:
Senior Sourcing Consultant
SourcifyChina | Supply Chain Integrity. Global Reach.
📧 [email protected] | www.sourcifychina.com
Confidential – For Internal Procurement Use Only
Get the Verified Supplier List
SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Report: Q1 2026
Prepared Exclusively for Global Procurement Leaders
Why Your Search for “China French Fries Holder Wholesale” Ends Here
Global foodservice procurement faces acute pressure: 73% of buyers report supply chain delays and compliance failures when sourcing food-contact products from China (ISM Global Sourcing Index, 2025). Generic “wholesale” searches for items like french fries holders expose buyers to critical risks: uncertified materials, hidden MOQ traps, and unvetted factories lacking export experience.
SourcifyChina’s Verified Pro List eliminates these pitfalls through a proprietary 9-stage validation process. For french fries holder wholesale, this means:
| Traditional Sourcing Approach | SourcifyChina Verified Pro List | Time Saved Per RFQ Cycle |
|---|---|---|
| 12–18 weeks for supplier vetting | Pre-qualified suppliers (48-hour access) | 147 hours |
| 68% risk of non-compliant materials (FDA/CE/LFGB) | 100% certified factories with live test reports | 42 hours (compliance validation) |
| 3–5 intermediaries inflating costs | Direct factory access (no brokers) | $22K+ (avg. cost avoidance) |
| MOQ surprises post-order | Transparent capacity data (min. 5K–50K units) | 28 hours (renegotiation) |
Your Strategic Advantage: Precision Sourcing in 2026
Our Pro List for french fries holders delivers what generic platforms cannot:
✅ Material Assurance: Factories audited for food-grade PP/PS compliance (ISO 22000, BRCGS)
✅ Scalability Proof: Real-time production data for peak-season demand (Q3 2026: +34% forecast)
✅ Logistics Integration: FCL-ready suppliers with bonded warehouse access (Shenzhen/Ningbo)
✅ Zero-Risk Trial: 3 suppliers per RFQ with sample validation under $150
“SourcifyChina cut our french fry holder sourcing cycle from 11 weeks to 9 days. Their Pro List prevented a $180K customs rejection due to unverified LFGB claims.”
— Procurement Director, Top 5 Global QSR Chain (2025 Client Case Study)
Call to Action: Secure Your 2026 Supply Chain Now
Every hour spent on unverified supplier searches risks:
⚠️ Margin erosion from emergency air freight
⚠️ Brand damage from non-compliant products
⚠️ Lost revenue during seasonal demand spikes (World Cup 2026 peak: July–August)
Act Before Q2 Capacity Locks (Deadline: March 31, 2026):
1. Email: Send your RFQ to [email protected] with subject line “FRIES HOLDER PRO LIST 2026”
→ Receive 3 vetted factory profiles + compliance dossier within 24 business hours
2. WhatsApp Priority Channel: Message +86 159 5127 6160
→ Get instant access to our 2026 French Fry Holder Capacity Tracker (live MOQ/pricing)
Do not risk Q3 shortages. Our Pro List guarantees:
🔹 97.3% on-time delivery rate (2025 performance)
🔹 Zero compliance-related shipment rejections
🔹 15% avg. cost reduction vs. traditional sourcing
© 2026 SourcifyChina. All supplier data validated per ISO 9001:2015 Sourcing Protocol. 72-hour RFQ response SLA guaranteed.
Your supply chain demands precision. We deliver certainty.
🧮 Landed Cost Calculator
Estimate your total import cost from China.
