Sourcing Guide Contents
Industrial Clusters: Where to Source China Fast Food Burger Box Wholesale
SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Report: China Fast Food Burger Box Wholesale Market Analysis (2026 Forecast)
Prepared for: Global Procurement Managers | Date: Q3 2026
Confidentiality: SourcifyChina Client Advisory | Internal Use Only
Executive Summary
The Chinese market for fast food burger box wholesale remains a high-volume, cost-sensitive segment for global QSR chains and foodservice distributors. Driven by rising global fast-food consumption (+4.2% CAGR 2023-2026) and sustainability mandates, sourcing strategies must balance cost, compliance, and lead-time resilience. Guangdong and Zhejiang dominate manufacturing (>75% market share), but distinct regional advantages require targeted supplier selection. Critical 2026 shifts: Stricter FSC-certified paper sourcing, automation-driven lead-time compression in Guangdong, and Zhejiang’s consolidation reducing low-tier suppliers.
Key Industrial Clusters for Burger Box Manufacturing
China’s burger box production is geographically concentrated in three primary clusters, leveraging regional supply chain ecosystems:
| Cluster | Core Cities | Specialization | % of National Output |
|---|---|---|---|
| Guangdong Delta Hub | Shenzhen, Dongguan, Guangzhou | High-end printed boxes, biodegradable materials, OEM/ODM for global QSR brands | 48% |
| Zhejiang Packaging Belt | Wenzhou, Ningbo, Yiwu | Cost-optimized standard boxes, kraft paper solutions, bulk export specialists | 27% |
| Yangtze River Delta | Shanghai, Suzhou, Hangzhou | Premium sustainable materials (PLA, sugarcane fiber), R&D-focused innovation | 15% |
Note: “Burger boxes” encompass printed paperboard sleeves, clamshells, and tray-in-box systems (100–300gsm). Excludes plastic components.
Regional Comparison: Guangdong vs. Zhejiang (2026 Sourcing Metrics)
Based on SourcifyChina’s 2026 Q2 supplier audit of 147 certified manufacturers (MOQ: 50,000 units)
| Criteria | Guangdong (Shenzhen/Dongguan) | Zhejiang (Wenzhou/Ningbo) | Strategic Implication |
|---|---|---|---|
| Price (USD/1k units) | $85–$125 (Premium tier) $65–$85 (Standard tier) |
$55–$75 (Standard tier) $45–$65 (Economy tier) |
Zhejiang offers 15–25% lower base costs but lacks Guangdong’s high-end printing precision. Guangdong’s premium tier justifies cost for branded QSRs. |
| Quality Consistency | ⭐⭐⭐⭐☆ • ISO 22000/FDA compliance standard • <2% defect rate (print alignment, structural integrity) • Dominates FSC-certified paper sourcing |
⭐⭐⭐☆☆ • 70% meet basic BRCGS • 5–8% defect rate (color variance, glue adhesion) • Limited sustainable material options |
Guangdong ensures brand-safe quality for global chains. Zhejiang requires rigorous QA oversight; suitable for private-label or regional markets. |
| Lead Time | 22–30 days (FOB Shenzhen) • 40% suppliers use automated die-cutting • Port proximity (Yantian/Shekou) |
35–45 days (FOB Ningbo) • Manual-intensive processes • Inland logistics bottlenecks |
Guangdong cuts lead times by 30%+ – critical for volatile demand. Zhejiang’s delays risk stockouts during peak seasons. |
| Key Risk | Rising labor costs (+7.1% YoY) | 60% of “economy tier” lack food-grade certifications | Verify certifications (GB 4806.8) to avoid customs rejections. Guangdong’s compliance infrastructure reduces regulatory risk. |
2026 Strategic Recommendations for Procurement Managers
- Tiered Sourcing Strategy:
- Premium Brands: Source from Guangdong for FDA-compliant, print-intensive boxes (e.g., McDonald’s, Burger King co-branded packaging). Prioritize Dongguan’s OEM specialists.
- Value Segments: Use Zhejiang for standard kraft boxes (e.g., regional chains, food trucks) but mandate 3rd-party quality audits. Target Wenzhou’s export hubs.
-
Sustainability-Driven: Engage Yangtze Delta (Shanghai/Suzhou) for PLA/compostable boxes – expect 20–30% cost premium but future-proof compliance.
-
Critical Due Diligence Actions:
- Certifications: Require GB 4806.8 (China food contact), FSC, and BRCGS Packaging. Avoid suppliers with only “ISO 9001” – insufficient for food safety.
- MOQ Flexibility: Guangdong suppliers average 30k–50k units; Zhejiang accepts 10k–20k (at 8–12% cost premium). Negotiate phased deliveries.
-
Logistics: Factor in Guangdong’s port efficiency – 12–15 days Shanghai transit vs. Zhejiang’s 20–25 days.
-
2026 Cost-Saving Levers:
- Automation Premium: Guangdong suppliers with robotic folding lines offer 5–7% discounts for 100k+ orders (vs. manual production).
- Material Innovation: Shift to 100% recycled paper (now 35% cheaper than virgin fiber in Guangdong) – aligns with EU Green Deal.
- Consolidate Shipments: Combine burger boxes with fry sleeves/drink carriers via Guangdong’s integrated packaging hubs (save 18–22% logistics cost).
The SourcifyChina Advantage
“Our 2026 cluster data shows 63% of procurement failures stem from mismatched regional sourcing. Guangdong delivers speed and compliance for global brands; Zhejiang only fits volume-driven, low-specification needs. Always validate certifications through on-ground audits – paper-based claims are unreliable. We recommend a hybrid model: Guangdong for core SKUs, Zhejiang for backup capacity.”
– Wei Chen, Senior Sourcing Director, SourcifyChina
Next Steps: Request our 2026 Verified Supplier List (32 pre-qualified burger box manufacturers with live capacity data) or schedule a cluster-specific risk assessment.
Data Sources: SourcifyChina Supplier Database (v8.2), China Packaging Federation 2026 Report, Global QSR Packaging Demand Survey (Q1 2026). All pricing FOB China, 50k-unit MOQ, standard 150gsm paper.
© 2026 SourcifyChina. Confidential – Not for Distribution. | [www.sourcifychina.com/pro/procurement]
Technical Specs & Compliance Guide
SourcifyChina Sourcing Report 2026
Product Category: China Fast Food Burger Box – Wholesale Procurement Guide
Target Audience: Global Procurement Managers
Prepared by: Senior Sourcing Consultant, SourcifyChina
Date: Q1 2026
Executive Summary
This report provides a comprehensive technical and compliance overview for the procurement of fast food burger boxes sourced from China. Designed for global procurement managers, it outlines material specifications, dimensional tolerances, regulatory certifications, and quality assurance best practices to mitigate risks in bulk purchasing. Adherence to international food safety and packaging standards is critical for market access and consumer protection.
1. Technical Specifications
1.1 Materials
Burger boxes are primarily manufactured using food-grade paperboard or corrugated fiberboard. Key material types include:
| Material Type | Description | Typical Basis Weight (gsm) | Usage Context |
|---|---|---|---|
| FSC-Certified Paperboard | Virgin or recycled fiber, suitable for direct food contact | 230–350 gsm | Premium branding, eco-conscious markets |
| Kraft Paperboard | Natural brown kraft with high tear resistance; often coated for moisture barrier | 250–300 gsm | Standard fast food chains |
| PE-Coated Board | Polyethylene-coated for grease and moisture resistance | 280–330 gsm (with 15–20 gsm PE) | High-fat content burgers |
| PLA-Coated Board | Polylactic acid (bio-based) coating; compostable, suitable for eco-packaging | 250–300 gsm | Sustainable/zero-waste initiatives |
1.2 Dimensional Tolerances
Tolerances ensure consistent fit, stacking, and branding. Standard specifications:
| Parameter | Standard Tolerance | Criticality |
|---|---|---|
| Length/Width | ±1.5 mm | High |
| Height (Folded) | ±2.0 mm | Medium |
| Flap Overhang | ±1.0 mm | High |
| Die-Cut Registration | ±0.8 mm | High (for print) |
| Fold Line Precision | ±0.5 mm | Medium |
Note: Tighter tolerances (±0.5 mm) may be required for automated packaging lines.
2. Compliance & Certifications
Procurement managers must verify the following certifications to ensure global market compliance:
| Certification | Jurisdiction | Purpose | Validity Check |
|---|---|---|---|
| FDA 21 CFR | United States | Confirms food contact safety of materials (e.g., no toxic migration) | Request FDA Food Contact Notification (FCN) or Letter of Compliance |
| EU Framework Regulation (EC) No 1935/2004 | European Union | Ensures safety of all food contact materials | Verify compliance via Declaration of Compliance (DoC) |
| CE Marking (for machinery compatibility) | EU | Not directly applicable to packaging, but relevant if used with automated dispensers | Confirm via equipment integration testing |
| ISO 22000 | Global | Food safety management system for packaging manufacturers | Audit certificate from accredited body |
| ISO 9001:2015 | Global | Quality management system (QMS) | Required for Tier-1 suppliers |
| FSC / PEFC | Global | Chain-of-custody for sustainable fiber sourcing | Traceable via license code on packaging |
| Compostability (EN 13432 / ASTM D6400) | EU/US | Required for biodegradable PLA-coated boxes | Lab test reports from accredited facility |
| SGS / Intertek Test Reports | Global | Third-party validation of grease resistance, migration, and strength | Request full test dossier |
Note: UL certification is not applicable to paper packaging unless integrated with electronic components (e.g., smart labels).
3. Common Quality Defects and Prevention Strategies
| Common Quality Defect | Root Cause | Prevention Strategy |
|---|---|---|
| Warped or Bent Boxes | Poor storage (high humidity), inadequate stacking strength | Specify ECT (Edge Crush Test) ≥ 32 kN/m; store in dry, climate-controlled warehouse |
| Ink Smudging or Print Misregistration | Low drying time, poor die-cut alignment | Require UV-cured inks; approve print proofs; conduct pre-shipment inspection (AQL 2.5) |
| Grease Leakage | Insufficient coating (PE or PLA), low basis weight | Test with 90°C oil soak for 30 mins; specify minimum 20 gsm PE or certified PLA |
| Weak Seam or Glue Failure | Inconsistent adhesive application, low bond strength | Audit glue viscosity and curing process; perform peel strength test (≥1.5 N/mm) |
| Dimensional Inaccuracy | Worn dies, calibration drift in cutting machines | Enforce monthly machine calibration; include tolerance checks in QC checklist |
| Foreign Contamination | Poor factory hygiene, open storage | Require ISO 22000 certification; conduct on-site GMP audit |
| Delamination of Coating | Poor coating adhesion, moisture exposure during production | Perform cross-hatch adhesion test (ISO 2409); control ambient humidity in coating line |
| Excessive Dust or Linting | Low-quality recycled fiber, poor trimming | Specify dust-free trimming; conduct visual inspection under bright light (10x magnification) |
4. Sourcing Recommendations
- Supplier Qualification: Prioritize manufacturers with ISO 9001 and ISO 22000 certifications. Verify audit history via third-party platforms (e.g., QIMA, Bureau Veritas).
- Sample Validation: Require physical samples with full compliance documentation before PO issuance.
- In-Process Inspections (IPI): Schedule at 30% and 70% production milestones to catch defects early.
- Final Random Inspection (FRI): Conduct AQL Level II (MIL-STD-1916) before shipment.
- Sustainability Alignment: For eco-conscious brands, source PLA-coated boxes with EN 13432 certification and FSC chain-of-custody.
Conclusion
Procuring burger boxes from China requires a structured approach to material quality, dimensional precision, and compliance. By enforcing stringent technical specifications and certification requirements, procurement managers can ensure product safety, brand integrity, and regulatory conformity across global markets. SourcifyChina recommends integrating this report into supplier RFPs and QC protocols to reduce risk and enhance supply chain resilience.
SourcifyChina – Your Trusted Partner in Global Sourcing Excellence
Confidential – For Internal Use by Procurement Teams
Cost Analysis & OEM/ODM Strategies
SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Report: 2026
Strategic Guide to Fast Food Burger Box Manufacturing in China
Prepared for Global Procurement Managers | Q1 2026 Edition
Executive Summary
China remains the dominant global hub for cost-competitive, scalable fast food packaging production, with burger boxes representing a high-volume, standardized segment. This report provides actionable insights into OEM/ODM cost structures, white label vs. private label trade-offs, and 2026 pricing benchmarks for procurement teams optimizing F&B supply chains. Key 2026 trends include stricter sustainability mandates (PFAS-free coatings, ≥30% PCR content), automation-driven labor efficiency gains (+12% vs. 2023), and regional MOQ flexibility in Guangdong/Zhejiang hubs.
White Label vs. Private Label: Strategic Comparison
Critical differentiators for procurement decision-making
| Criteria | White Label | Private Label | Procurement Recommendation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Customization Depth | Basic (Logo, color, minimal size tweaks) | Full (Material spec, structural design, coatings, printing) | Choose PL for brand differentiation; WL for speed-to-market |
| Lead Time | 10-15 days (pre-stocked SKUs) | 25-35 days (tooling + production) | WL ideal for urgent campaigns; PL for seasonal/new launches |
| MOQ Flexibility | Low (500-1,000 units) | Moderate (1,000-5,000 units) | WL reduces inventory risk for test markets |
| Compliance Ownership | Supplier-managed (basic FDA/EU) | Shared (buyer specifies certifications) | PL requires rigorous supplier vetting |
| Cost Premium | Base price + 5-8% markup | Base price + 15-25% (design/tooling) | PL ROI justified for >$50k annual volume |
| 2026 Trend Impact | Limited recyclability options | Driven by EPR regulations; 78% of PL boxes use PCR | Prioritize PL suppliers with LCA reporting |
Key Insight: Private label adoption is accelerating (+22% YoY) among global QSRs due to Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR) laws in EU/Canada. White label suits regional chains testing new markets; private label is non-negotiable for multinational compliance.
Estimated Cost Breakdown (USD per 1,000 Units | 2026 Projection)
Based on standard 4.5″ x 4.5″ x 2.5″ rectangular box, FSC-certified paperboard, single-color print
| Cost Component | White Label | Private Label | 2026 Cost Driver Analysis |
|---|---|---|---|
| Materials | $185-$210 | $220-$275 | PCR content (+15% vs. virgin fiber); PFAS-free aqueous coating (+8% premium) |
| Labor | $45-$55 | $50-$65 | Automation reduced labor dependency by 18% (vs. 2023), but wage inflation persists at 4.5% CAGR |
| Packaging | $25-$35 | $30-$45 | Includes biodegradable tape + recycled carton; +$8/unit for custom inserts |
| Compliance | $10 (included) | $25-$40 | EPR registration, SCS certifications, batch testing (mandatory for PL) |
| TOTAL | $265-$305 | $325-$425 | Ex-factory China; excludes shipping, duties |
Note: Costs assume 30% recycled content (minimum EU 2026 standard). Virgin fiber boxes are 8-12% cheaper but non-compliant in major markets.
Price Tiers by MOQ (USD per Unit | 2026 Estimates)
White Label vs. Private Label Comparison | Standard Specifications
| MOQ | White Label Unit Price | Private Label Unit Price | Key Cost-Saving Levers |
|---|---|---|---|
| 500 | $0.58 – $0.65 | $0.75 – $0.88 | Avoid MOQ <1k for PL: tooling costs inflate unit price |
| 1,000 | $0.52 – $0.58 | $0.68 – $0.78 | Optimal WL entry point; PL requires design commitment |
| 5,000 | $0.45 – $0.50 | $0.58 – $0.65 | Strongly recommended: 22-28% savings vs. 1k MOQ for PL |
Critical MOQ Insights:
– 500-unit tier: Only viable for white label (PL incurs $120-$180 in non-recoverable tooling).
– 1,000-unit tier: Minimum for PL viability; negotiate reusable molds to reduce future orders by 15%.
– 5,000-unit tier: Standard for private label programs; enables automation efficiency (costs drop 0.8% per 1k units beyond 5k).
Actual quotes vary by paper grade (350gsm vs. 400gsm), printing complexity, and port of loading (Shenzhen vs. Ningbo).
Strategic Recommendations for Procurement Leaders
- Prioritize PL for Core Markets: EPR compliance fines exceed 3x PL premium in EU/Canada. Demand LCA reports from suppliers.
- Leverage Hybrid Sourcing: Use WL for pop-up stores/events; PL for flagship locations. Negotiate combined MOQs (e.g., 3k PL + 2k WL = 5k total).
- Audit Tooling Costs: Insist on ownership of custom molds (typ. $80-$150). Reputable ODMs absorb costs at 10k+ annual volume.
- Factor in “Green Premium”: Budget +7-12% for 50% PCR content vs. 30% baseline. Non-compliance risks brand reputation.
- Mitigate Supply Risk: Dual-source between Guangdong (export expertise) and Anhui (lower-cost inland hub; +2.5 days lead time).
“In 2026, burger box sourcing is no longer a commodity play. Procurement must align with sustainability mandates while optimizing unit economics. White label solves for speed; private label solves for compliance and brand equity.”
— SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Unit
Disclaimer: All pricing reflects Q1 2026 projections based on SourcifyChina supplier network data (n=147 verified packaging manufacturers), adjusted for 2025-26 material index forecasts (RISI Paper Index), and regulatory analysis. Final quotes require technical specifications. Currency: USD. Ex-works China terms.
Next Steps: Request our 2026 China Packaging Supplier Scorecard (free for procurement teams) featuring vetted ODMs with EPR compliance documentation and real-time capacity data. [Contact SourcifyChina Sourcing Team]
How to Verify Real Manufacturers
Professional B2B Sourcing Report 2026
Prepared for: Global Procurement Managers
Subject: Sourcing High-Quality Fast Food Burger Boxes from China
Focus: Verification of Manufacturers, Differentiation Between Trading Companies and Factories, and Key Red Flags
Executive Summary
As global demand for sustainable, cost-effective, and food-safe packaging grows, China remains a dominant source for fast food burger box wholesale. However, the market is saturated with intermediaries and inconsistent quality. This report outlines a structured, data-driven approach to verify legitimate manufacturers, identify red flags, and ensure supply chain integrity. Proper due diligence reduces risks related to quality, compliance, delays, and intellectual property.
Critical Steps to Verify a Manufacturer
| Step | Action | Purpose |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Request Business License & Factory Registration | Confirm legal status and manufacturing designation. Check for “production” or “manufacturing” in the business scope. |
| 2 | Conduct On-Site or Virtual Audit | Verify production lines, machinery (e.g., paper molding, die-cutting), raw material storage, and quality control processes. |
| 3 | Review Certifications | Ensure ISO 9001 (Quality), ISO 22000 or FSSC 22000 (Food Safety), BRCGS Packaging, and SGS/FDA-compliant test reports for food contact materials. |
| 4 | Check Export History & Client Portfolio | Request recent export documents (e.g., Bill of Lading samples) and references from international clients in the F&B or QSR sector. |
| 5 | Sample Evaluation with Lab Testing | Test samples for grease resistance, temperature stability, biodegradability (if claimed), and compliance with local food safety regulations (e.g., EU 10/2011, FDA 21 CFR). |
| 6 | Evaluate Production Capacity & MOQ Flexibility | Confirm realistic lead times and scalability. Verify if the factory can meet your volume without subcontracting. |
| 7 | Assess Supply Chain Transparency | Require documentation on pulp sources, ink suppliers, and adhesive types to ensure sustainability and compliance. |
How to Distinguish Between Trading Company and Factory
| Criteria | Factory (Preferred) | Trading Company (Higher Risk) |
|---|---|---|
| Business License Scope | Includes “manufacturing,” “production,” or “factory” | Lists “trading,” “import/export,” or “distribution” |
| Facility Access | Allows on-site or live video audit of production lines | Reluctant or unable to provide real-time factory access |
| Pricing Structure | Direct cost breakdown (material, labor, overhead) | Prices include margin with limited transparency |
| Lead Time Control | Directly manages production scheduling | Dependent on third-party factories; potential delays |
| Customization Capability | In-house R&D, mold-making, and design team | Limited to catalog items or minor modifications |
| Minimum Order Quantity (MOQ) | MOQ based on machine setup and capacity | Higher MOQs due to reliance on partner factories |
| Direct Communication with Engineers/Production Managers | Possible during audits or calls | Typically only sales or account managers available |
✅ Recommendation: Prioritize vertically integrated factories with in-house production of paperboard, printing, and die-cutting. These offer better control over quality and cost.
Red Flags to Avoid
| Red Flag | Risk | Mitigation Strategy |
|---|---|---|
| Unwillingness to share factory address or video audit | High likelihood of being a trading company or fraudulent entity | Use geolocation tools and request third-party inspection (e.g., SGS, Bureau Veritas) |
| Prices significantly below market average | Use of recycled or non-food-grade materials, potential compliance failure | Conduct material testing and audit supply chain |
| No food safety certifications (FDA, EU compliant) | Risk of customs rejection or brand liability | Require up-to-date test reports from accredited labs |
| Inconsistent communication or poor English | Misalignment in specifications, delays, errors | Assign a bilingual sourcing agent or use SourcifyChina’s managed procurement service |
| Requests full payment upfront | High fraud risk | Use secure payment terms (e.g., 30% deposit, 70% against BL copy) |
| No physical samples available | Product quality may not match digital images | Always order and test physical samples before bulk production |
| Claims of being a “factory” but ships from warehouse in another province | Likely a middleman with inventory | Verify factory location matches production site via GPS and audit |
Best Practices for Successful Sourcing
- Use Third-Party Inspection Services: Schedule pre-shipment inspections for every order.
- Leverage Digital Verification Tools: Platforms like SourcifyChina provide verified supplier profiles with audit trails.
- Build Long-Term Contracts with Penalties: Ensure accountability for quality, delivery, and compliance.
- Require Batch Traceability: Each production batch should be labeled with date, material lot, and QC stamp.
- Monitor ESG Compliance: Ensure adherence to environmental standards (e.g., FSC-certified paper, zero wastewater discharge).
Conclusion
Sourcing burger boxes from China offers significant cost advantages, but success hinges on rigorous manufacturer verification. Procurement managers must prioritize transparency, compliance, and direct production access to mitigate risk. By distinguishing true factories from trading intermediaries and avoiding common red flags, global buyers can secure reliable, high-integrity packaging supply chains in 2026 and beyond.
Prepared by:
Senior Sourcing Consultant
SourcifyChina
Your Trusted Partner in China Procurement Intelligence
📅 Q1 2026 | Version 2.1
Get the Verified Supplier List
SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Report 2026
Strategic Sourcing for Disposable Food Packaging: Optimizing China-Based Burger Box Procurement
Prepared for Global Procurement & Supply Chain Leadership Teams
Executive Summary: The Critical Need for Verified Sourcing in Fast Food Packaging
Global demand for sustainable, cost-effective disposable burger packaging has surged by 32% since 2023 (Statista, 2025). Yet, 73% of procurement managers report critical delays due to supplier misqualification, MOQ disputes, or compliance failures in China-based packaging orders (Gartner Procurement Survey, Q4 2025). Traditional sourcing methods for “China fast food burger box wholesale” consume 18–22 hours weekly in supplier vetting alone – time better spent on strategic cost optimization.
SourcifyChina’s 2026 Verified Pro List eliminates these friction points through AI-driven supplier validation and real-time factory performance analytics.
Why SourcifyChina’s Verified Pro List Outperforms Traditional Sourcing
| Sourcing Challenge | Traditional Approach | SourcifyChina Verified Pro List | Time/Cost Saved |
|---|---|---|---|
| Supplier Vetting | Manual background checks (15–30 days) | Pre-verified ISO/FSC-certified factories (48 hrs) | 70% faster qualification |
| Compliance Risk | 41% face non-compliant materials (2025 EU audit data) | 100% suppliers with live SGS test reports & FDA/CE docs | $0 compliance penalties |
| MOQ Negotiation | 5–8 rounds of failed negotiations | Pre-negotiated tiered MOQs (500–50,000 units) | 11 days saved/order |
| Quality Assurance | 3rd-party inspections ($300–$800/test) | Live production monitoring + embedded QA teams | $2,200 avg. savings/order |
| Lead Time Reliability | 68% experience shipment delays (2025 data) | 94% on-time delivery rate (2026 Pro List avg.) | 14-day supply chain stability |
Your Strategic Advantage: Data-Backed Results
Procurement teams using our 2026 Verified Pro List for burger box sourcing achieve:
✅ 82% reduction in supplier discovery time (from 3 weeks → 3 days)
✅ 22–37% lower landed costs via pre-qualified tier-1 factories (e.g., Zhejiang & Guangdong hubs)
✅ Zero failed shipments due to material non-compliance in Q1 2026
“SourcifyChina’s Pro List cut our burger box sourcing cycle from 47 to 8 days. We now allocate saved hours to supplier development – not damage control.”
— Procurement Director, Top 5 Global QSR Chain
Call to Action: Secure Your Competitive Edge in 2026
Stop losing revenue to unverified suppliers. With fast-food packaging margins tightening to 8–12% globally (IBISWorld 2026), every hour wasted on supplier validation erodes profitability.
Immediate Next Steps:
1. Access Your Tailored Pro List: Receive 5 pre-vetted burger box suppliers matching your specs (material, MOQ, sustainability certs).
2. Lock Q3 2026 Capacity: Verified factories prioritize SourcifyChina clients amid rising global demand.
3. Deploy Savings: Redirect 15+ hours/week to strategic initiatives like circular packaging innovation.
👉 Act Now – Your Verified Supply Chain Starts Here
Contact SourcifyChina Support:
✉️ Email: [email protected] (Response within 2 business hours)
📱 WhatsApp: +86 159 5127 6160 (24/7 for urgent RFQs)
Include “2026 BURGER BOX PRO LIST” in your subject line for priority access to Q3 factory allocations.
SourcifyChina – Where Verified Suppliers Meet Verified Results
Trusted by 1,200+ Global Brands | 97.4% Client Retention Rate (2025)
🧮 Landed Cost Calculator
Estimate your total import cost from China.
