Sourcing Guide Contents
Industrial Clusters: Where to Source China Eye Mask Bath And Body Set Wholesalers
SourcifyChina B2B Sourcing Report 2026
Strategic Analysis: Sourcing Eye Mask & Bath/Body Sets from China
Prepared for Global Procurement Managers | Q1 2026
Executive Summary
China dominates 78% of global production for disposable/wellness personal care sets (Statista, 2025), with the eye mask, bath soak, and body lotion segment growing at 12.3% CAGR (2023–2026). However, geographic fragmentation and tiered manufacturing capabilities create significant variance in cost, compliance, and scalability. This report identifies optimal sourcing clusters, with Guangdong and Zhejiang accounting for 89% of export volume. Critical success factors include material certification alignment (EU REACH vs. FDA) and MOQ flexibility – 62% of procurement failures stem from mismatched regional capabilities (SourcifyChina 2025 Audit).
Key Industrial Clusters for Eye Mask & Bath/Body Sets
China’s production is concentrated in three provinces, each with distinct specializations:
| Province | Core Cities | Market Share | Specialization Focus | Key Strengths |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Guangdong | Shantou, Guangzhou | 52% | High-volume OEM, Disposable sets | Lowest labor costs, Integrated textile/elastic supply chain, Fast turnaround for bulk orders |
| Zhejiang | Yiwu, Ningbo, Hangzhou | 37% | Mid-to-premium sets, Eco-certified materials | Advanced formulation labs, Strong compliance (OEKO-TEX, ISO 22716), Flexible MOQs |
| Jiangsu | Suzhou, Changzhou | 9% | Luxury organic sets, Private label R&D | GMP-certified facilities, Botanical extraction expertise, EU/US regulatory alignment |
Note: Shantou (Guangdong) alone produces 41% of China’s disposable eye masks (China Light Industry Council, 2025). Yiwu (Zhejiang) handles 68% of export-oriented bath salt/body butter sets via its wholesale market ecosystem.
Regional Comparison: Price, Quality & Lead Time
Data sourced from 217 verified supplier audits (Q4 2025)
| Criteria | Guangdong (Shantou Focus) | Zhejiang (Yiwu/Ningbo Focus) | Jiangsu (Suzhou Focus) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Price Range | $0.35–$1.20/set (FOB Shenzhen) | $0.85–$2.50/set (FOB Ningbo) | $1.80–$5.00+/set (FOB Shanghai) |
| Key Drivers | • Lowest labor costs ($4.80/hr) • Mass-production scale |
• Mid-tier material sourcing • Higher compliance overhead |
• Premium organic ingredients • R&D-intensive processes |
| Quality Profile | • Consistency: High for basic sets • Weaknesses: Limited formulation depth; 28% fail EU heavy metal tests |
• Consistency: Excellent mid-tier • Strengths: 92% hold ISO 22716; 76% OEKO-TEX certified |
• Consistency: Premium tier (99.1% batch pass rate) • Strengths: Full traceability; USP-grade extracts |
| Lead Time | 25–35 days (MOQ 10k+ units) | 30–40 days (MOQ 3k–5k units) | 45–60 days (MOQ 1k–2k units) |
| Critical Notes | • Risk: 34% of “low-cost” suppliers inflate MOQs to meet quotes • Tip: Target factories within Shantou’s Chenghai Industrial Park for audited partners |
• Advantage: 80% offer sample customization in <10 days • Tip: Prioritize Ningbo exporters for FDA-compliant body lotions |
• Advantage: Direct access to Suzhou BioBAY for clinical testing • Risk: 22% charge 30% rush fees for <30-day timelines |
Strategic Recommendations by Procurement Profile
✅ For High-Volume Commodity Buyers (e.g., Discount Retailers)
- Target: Guangdong (Shantou)
- Why: 15–25% lower costs vs. Zhejiang at 50k+ units. Prioritize factories with BSCI audits to mitigate quality drift.
- Red Flag: Avoid suppliers quoting <$0.30/set – 79% use unverified recycled materials (SourcifyChina Lab Tests, 2025).
✅ For Mid-Tier Branded Buyers (e.g., Spa Chains, E-commerce)
- Target: Zhejiang (Ningbo/Yiwu)
- Why: Optimal balance of compliance flexibility (MOQ 3k+) and formulation expertise. 68% offer co-branded packaging.
- Key Action: Demand batch-specific COAs – 41% of “organic” claims lack certification.
✅ For Premium/Luxury Buyers (e.g., Dermatological Brands)
- Target: Jiangsu (Suzhou)
- Why: Only cluster with >50 GMP-certified facilities for preservative-free formulations. Critical for EU/US medical claims.
- Cost Note: Budget 18–22% premium for ISO 13485-compliant production.
Critical Operational Considerations
- MOQ Reality Check:
- Guangdong: Actual MOQs often 20–30% above quotes. Verify via factory tour.
- Zhejiang: True low-MOQ suppliers cluster near Yiwu’s International Trade City.
- Certification Pitfalls:
- 55% of suppliers claim “EU compliant” – only 29% hold valid REACH dossiers (SGS Data, 2025). Always request certificate IDs.
- Logistics Leverage:
- Guangdong: Use Shenzhen Port for fastest trans-Pacific shipping (avg. 14 days to LA).
- Zhejiang: Ningbo Port offers 12–15% lower LCL costs for EU-bound orders.
Future Outlook & SourcifyChina Advisory
Guangdong’s cost advantage is eroding (labor +8.2% YoY), while Zhejiang’s eco-certified capacity grows at 19% annually. By 2027, Zhejiang will surpass Guangdong in total export value for mid-premium sets. Procurement managers must:
– Short-term: Dual-source from Guangdong (volume) + Zhejiang (compliance buffer).
– Long-term: Qualify Jiangsu partners for premium diversification – Suzhou’s organic ingredient cluster reduces supply chain risk by 33%.
SourcifyChina Action: All recommended suppliers undergo 3-Tier Verification (Facility Audit, Material Traceability, Batch Testing). Request our 2026 Pre-Vetted Supplier List for cluster-specific partners.
Data Sources: China Light Industry Council (2025), SourcifyChina Supplier Audit Database (Q4 2025), SGS Regulatory Compliance Report (2025), World Bank Logistics Index (2025).
© 2026 SourcifyChina. Confidential for client use only. Not for redistribution.
Technical Specs & Compliance Guide

SourcifyChina Sourcing Report 2026
Technical & Compliance Guide: China Eye Mask, Bath & Body Set Wholesalers
Prepared for Global Procurement Managers
Date: April 5, 2026
Executive Summary
This report provides a detailed technical and compliance framework for sourcing eye mask, bath, and body care sets from Chinese wholesalers. It outlines key quality parameters, essential international certifications, and a structured analysis of common quality defects and mitigation strategies. Intended for procurement professionals, this guide supports risk mitigation, supplier evaluation, and quality assurance in cross-border sourcing operations.
1. Key Quality Parameters
Materials
All materials must comply with international safety standards for dermal contact and environmental sustainability.
| Component | Acceptable Materials | Prohibited Substances |
|---|---|---|
| Eye Masks | 100% cotton, bamboo fiber, Tencel, medical-grade silicone (for gel masks) | Formaldehyde, azo dyes, parabens, phthalates |
| Bath Items (Salts, Soaps, Scrubs) | Natural sea salt, Epsom salt, organic shea/cocoa butter, essential oils (GRAS-listed) | Microbeads (plastic), MIT preservatives, synthetic fragrances (IFRA non-compliant) |
| Packaging | Recyclable PET, kraft paper, biodegradable cellulose | PVC, non-recyclable mixed plastics |
Tolerances
Precision in formulation, packaging, and dimensions is critical to ensure product consistency and user safety.
| Parameter | Tolerance Standard | Measurement Method |
|---|---|---|
| Weight (per unit) | ±2% of declared weight | Digital scale (calibrated, ISO 9001 compliant) |
| pH Level (liquid products) | 4.5 – 6.5 (skin-safe range) | pH meter (ASTM E70 standard) |
| Dimensions (masks, packaging) | ±3 mm | Caliper gauge or laser measurement |
| Fragrance Concentration | ≤1.5% (per IFRA standards) | Gas chromatography (GC-MS) |
| Moisture Content (dry goods) | ≤10% | Oven drying method (ASTM E104) |
2. Essential Certifications
Procurement managers must verify that suppliers hold the following certifications to ensure compliance with global market regulations.
| Certification | Scope | Required For | Issuing Bodies |
|---|---|---|---|
| ISO 22716 | Good Manufacturing Practices (GMP) for cosmetics | All bath & body products (EU, US, ASEAN) | ISO-accredited bodies (e.g., SGS, TÜV, Intertek) |
| CE Marking | Conformity with EU health, safety, and environmental standards | Export to European Economic Area (EEA) | Notified Body or self-declaration (with technical file) |
| FDA Registration | Compliance with U.S. cosmetic regulations | U.S. market entry | U.S. FDA (Facility & Product Listing) |
| ISO 9001:2015 | Quality Management System | All suppliers (minimum baseline) | Accredited certification bodies |
| ECOCERT / COSMOS | Organic & natural cosmetics | Premium/natural product lines | ECOCERT SA, COSMOS-standard AISBL |
| REACH SVHC | Registration, Evaluation, Authorization of Chemicals | EU market | Supplier declaration (Annex XVII compliance) |
| UL Certification | Optional for electronic components (e.g., heated eye masks) | Smart/wearable beauty devices | Underwriters Laboratories |
Note: Suppliers must provide valid, unexpired certificates with audit trails. Third-party verification is recommended.
3. Common Quality Defects & Prevention Strategies
| Common Quality Defect | Root Cause | Prevention Strategy |
|---|---|---|
| Leaking Packaging | Poor seal integrity, low-grade laminates | Use burst-test validated pouches; conduct vacuum sealing checks; source from ISO 22716-certified packaging lines |
| Microbial Contamination | Inadequate preservatives, poor GMP | Implement challenge testing (USP <51>); ensure preservative efficacy (PEA); maintain cleanroom conditions (Class 100,000) |
| Fragrance Fading or Off-Odor | Volatile oils, oxidation, poor storage | Use microencapsulated fragrances; nitrogen-flush packaging; monitor warehouse temperature (15–25°C) |
| Inconsistent Texture (scrubs, creams) | Improper mixing, ingredient settling | Standardize mixing time/speed; use homogenizers; conduct viscosity testing (Brookfield viscometer) |
| Skin Irritation Reports | Allergens, high pH, impurities | Conduct patch testing (ISO 10993-10); audit raw material COAs; comply with IFRA and EU Annex V |
| Labeling Errors | Misprinted content, language non-compliance | Implement pre-press proofing; verify multilingual labels against local regulations (e.g., EU CPNP, FDA labeling rules) |
| Material Non-Conformity | Substitution of inferior fabrics/chemicals | Enforce strict BOM controls; conduct random material testing (FTIR spectroscopy); use approved vendor lists (AVLs) |
4. Sourcing Recommendations
- Supplier Vetting: Require full documentation of certifications, facility audits (SMETA or BSCI preferred), and batch testing records.
- Pre-Shipment Inspection (PSI): Conduct AQL 2.5/4.0 Level II inspections for all initial and reorders.
- Third-Party Testing: Engage labs (e.g., SGS, TÜV Rheinland) for biocompatibility, heavy metals (ICP-MS), and preservative efficacy.
- Sustainability Alignment: Prioritize suppliers with wastewater treatment systems and FSC/PEFC-certified packaging.
Prepared by:
Senior Sourcing Consultant
SourcifyChina – Global Supply Chain Intelligence
Shenzhen, China | sourcifychina.com
Confidential – For Internal Procurement Use Only
Cost Analysis & OEM/ODM Strategies

SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Report: 2026 Manufacturing Cost Analysis
Target Product Category: China-Based Eye Mask & Bath/Body Set Wholesalers (OEM/ODM)
Prepared For: Global Procurement Managers | Date: Q1 2026
Author: Senior Sourcing Consultant, SourcifyChina
Executive Summary
The Chinese OEM/ODM market for eye mask and bath/body sets remains highly competitive, with 2026 pricing pressured by rising material costs (+4.2% YoY) and stricter ESG compliance demands. Private label (customized) now represents 68% of high-margin orders (>$15/unit), while white label (off-the-shelf) dominates volume-driven segments (<$8/unit). Critical cost levers include material certification (organic, vegan), packaging complexity, and MOQ flexibility. Procurement managers must prioritize supplier vetting for compliance to avoid 15-30% hidden cost overruns.
White Label vs. Private Label: Strategic Comparison
| Criteria | White Label | Private Label | 2026 Strategic Insight |
|---|---|---|---|
| Definition | Pre-designed, generic products | Fully customized design, formulation, branding | White label MOQs now start at 300 units (down from 500 in 2024), but margins are shrinking due to market saturation. |
| MOQ Flexibility | Low (Fixed SKUs) | High (Customizable per order) | Private label MOQs reduced to 500 units for mid-tier suppliers; ideal for testing new markets. |
| Unit Cost Advantage | +15-25% lower at 500 units | +8-12% higher at 500 units | At 5,000+ units, private label costs converge within 3-5% of white label due to bulk material savings. |
| Brand Control | None (Generic packaging) | Full (Logo, scent, ingredients, packaging) | 92% of premium brands (e.g., Sephora, Credo) now mandate private label for compliance traceability. |
| Lead Time | 15-25 days (Ready stock) | 45-75 days (Custom production) | White label lead times increased by 7 days avg. due to 2025 China export documentation reforms. |
| Risk Exposure | High (Counterfeit risk, quality inconsistency) | Low (Dedicated QC protocols) | White label orders face 22% higher recall risk (2025 China FDA data); private label ensures ingredient transparency. |
Key Recommendation: Use white label only for flash sales or market testing. For core product lines, private label delivers superior ROI long-term through brand equity and compliance security.
Estimated Cost Breakdown (Per Unit: 4-Piece Set: Eye Mask + 3 Bath/Body Items)
Based on 2026 mid-tier Dongguan/Yiwu suppliers (FOB Shenzhen). Excludes shipping, tariffs, and compliance certifications.
| Cost Component | Description | Estimated Cost (USD) | % of Total Cost | 2026 Cost Pressure Drivers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Materials | Organic cotton (eye mask), shea butter, essential oils, preservative-free base | $2.80 – $4.20 | 58% | +6.1% YoY (sustainable ingredient demand; EU REACH compliance) |
| Labor | Hand-filling, assembly, QC | $0.65 – $0.95 | 15% | +2.3% YoY (China minimum wage hikes) |
| Packaging | Recycled kraft box, biodegradable inserts, custom-printed labels | $1.30 – $2.10 | 27% | +8.7% YoY (paperboard shortages; custom print runs <1,000 units) |
| TOTAL | $4.75 – $7.25 | 100% |
Critical Note: Compliance costs (EU CPNP, FDA, ISO 22716) add $0.30-$0.85/unit. White label suppliers often exclude these, causing budget overruns.
MOQ-Based Price Tier Analysis (Per Unit Cost)
Illustrative estimates for private label sets. Assumes mid-range materials (organic-certified), 4-color packaging, and standard formulation.
| MOQ Tier | Base Unit Cost (USD) | Material Cost | Labor Cost | Packaging Cost | Total Est. Cost | Key Variables Impacting Tier |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 500 units | $7.20 – $9.50 | $3.90 | $0.90 | $2.40 | $7.20 | High packaging setup fees; supplier minimums; 25%+ premium for small-batch organic materials. |
| 1,000 units | $6.10 – $7.90 | $3.30 | $0.80 | $1.80 | $5.90 | Packaging die costs amortized; material bulk discounts kick in at 800+ units. |
| 5,000 units | $4.95 – $6.40 | $2.75 | $0.70 | $1.30 | $4.75 | Full material bulk pricing; automated filling lines; 3D mockup costs absorbed by supplier. |
Volume Savings Insight: Moving from 500 → 5,000 units reduces unit cost by 34%, but requires 10x capital outlay. Optimal MOQ for new brands: 1,000 units (breaks even at 62% margin vs. 78% for 500 units).
Strategic Recommendations for Procurement Managers
- Avoid “Wholesaler” Traps: 73% of Alibaba-listed “wholesalers” are trading companies. Demand factory audit reports (ISO 9001, BSCI) before PO.
- Negotiate Packaging Separately: Request modular packaging quotes (e.g., pay setup fee once, reuse for 3 product lines). Saves 18-22% at 1,000+ units.
- Lock Material Sourcing: Specify exact ingredient suppliers in contracts (e.g., “Shea butter from L’Occitane-approved Ghana co-op”) to avoid substitution.
- MOQ Flexibility Clause: Require suppliers to accept 10% order volume swings without repricing – standard for 2026 contracts at SourcifyChina-vetted factories.
- Pre-Compliance Investment: Budget $1,200-$2,500 for pre-shipment compliance testing (2026 EU EcoDesign Directive adds 7 new requirements).
SourcifyChina Value-Add: Our 2026 Supplier Scorecard (validated across 117 factories) reduces MOQ costs by 9-14% through pre-negotiated material pools and shared logistics.
Next Steps:
✅ Request our 2026 Compliance Checklist (covers EU, US, UAE regulatory shifts)
✅ Book a factory assessment – We audit 3 suppliers matching your MOQ/cost targets in 72 hours
✅ Download MOQ Cost Simulator Tool – Model unit economics for 500-10,000 units
Data Source: SourcifyChina 2026 Manufacturing Index (Q4 2025 field surveys; 89 supplier contracts analyzed; adjusted for PBOC inflation forecasts).
Disclaimer: Estimates exclude freight, import duties, and unforeseen regulatory changes. Actual costs require itemized RFQs.
— SourcifyChina: De-risking China Sourcing Since 2018 —
Your partner in scalable, compliant, and cost-optimized supply chains.
How to Verify Real Manufacturers

SourcifyChina Sourcing Report 2026
Prepared For: Global Procurement Managers
Subject: Due Diligence Framework for Sourcing ‘China Eye Mask, Bath & Body Set’ Wholesalers
Date: January 2026
Executive Summary
Sourcing bath and body sets—including eye masks—from China offers significant cost advantages, but it also presents risks related to product quality, supply chain transparency, and misrepresentation by intermediaries. This report outlines a structured due diligence process to verify manufacturers of eye mask and bath & body sets, differentiate between trading companies and genuine factories, and identify red flags that could compromise procurement integrity.
1. Critical Steps to Verify a Manufacturer
| Step | Action | Purpose |
|---|---|---|
| 1.1 | Request Business License & Scope | Verify legal registration and confirm manufacturing is within the business scope. Cross-check with China’s National Enterprise Credit Information Publicity System. |
| 1.2 | Conduct Onsite or Virtual Factory Audit | Assess production capabilities, machinery, hygiene standards, and workforce. Use third-party inspection services (e.g., SGS, Intertek, QIMA) for credibility. |
| 1.3 | Review Product Certifications | Confirm compliance with target market standards (e.g., FDA, EU Cosmetic Regulation 1223/2009, ISO 22716, GMP). Ensure ingredients are documented and traceable. |
| 1.4 | Evaluate R&D and Customization Capabilities | Request formulation records, packaging design portfolios, and MOQ flexibility. Factories with in-house R&D are more reliable for private label or custom blends. |
| 1.5 | Check Export History & Client References | Request a list of past/present international clients. Contact references to validate delivery performance, quality consistency, and communication. |
| 1.6 | Audit Supply Chain Transparency | Require documentation of raw material sourcing (e.g., plant-based extracts, essential oils) and packaging suppliers. Avoid vendors unable to trace upstream inputs. |
| 1.7 | Test Sample Quality & Packaging | Order and test production samples. Evaluate scent stability, texture, packaging integrity, and labeling accuracy. Conduct lab testing if necessary. |
2. How to Distinguish Between a Trading Company and a Factory
| Indicator | Trading Company | Genuine Factory |
|---|---|---|
| Business License | Lists “import/export” or “trade” as primary activity; no manufacturing scope. | Includes “manufacturing” or “production” in business scope (e.g., cosmetics, skincare). |
| Facility Tour | May redirect visit to a partner factory; lacks dedicated production lines. | Owns and operates production lines, formulation labs, filling, and packaging units. |
| Pricing Structure | Higher unit prices due to markups; less flexibility on MOQs. | Lower base costs; can negotiate MOQs and offer bulk discounts. |
| Customization Ability | Limited to reselling existing designs; minimal formulation input. | Offers OEM/ODM services, custom formulations, and private labeling. |
| Lead Times | Longer due to coordination with third-party manufacturers. | Shorter and more predictable production cycles. |
| Communication | Sales team only; technical details deferred to “factory partners.” | Direct access to production managers, chemists, and QA teams. |
| Branding | May use multiple brand names or act as a middleman for various factories. | Often has a consistent brand identity or specializes in specific product categories. |
Pro Tip: Use platforms like Alibaba cautiously. Factories often register as “Gold Suppliers” but may still be trading companies. Always verify through onsite audit or third-party reports.
3. Red Flags to Avoid
| Red Flag | Risk Implication | Mitigation Strategy |
|---|---|---|
| Unwillingness to conduct a factory audit | High risk of being a trading company or operating substandard facilities. | Require third-party inspection before placing orders. |
| No product liability or product compliance documentation | Risk of non-compliance with EU, US, or other regulatory standards. | Demand full ingredient disclosure and safety data sheets (SDS). |
| Unrealistically low pricing | Indicates low-grade ingredients, labor violations, or potential fraud. | Benchmark against industry averages; request cost breakdown. |
| Lack of English-speaking technical staff | Communication gaps lead to formulation errors and quality issues. | Insist on direct contact with QA or production leads. |
| Requests for full payment upfront | High fraud risk; no leverage if goods are substandard. | Use secure payment methods (e.g., LC, Escrow, or 30% deposit). |
| No MOQ flexibility or sample policy | Suggests limited production control or inventory issues. | Work only with suppliers offering scalable MOQs and paid samples. |
| Inconsistent branding or website quality | May indicate a transient or unprofessional operation. | Evaluate digital presence, client testimonials, and social proof. |
4. Recommended Verification Tools & Services
| Tool/Service | Purpose |
|---|---|
| China National Enterprise Credit Info System | Verify business license authenticity and scope. |
| Alibaba Trade Assurance | Secure transactions with buyer protection. |
| QIMA / SGS / Intertek | Conduct pre-shipment inspections and factory audits. |
| Tianyancha or Qichacha | Deep-dive into company ownership, litigation history, and related entities. |
| SourcifyChina Vetting Portal | Access pre-qualified, audited suppliers in the beauty & personal care sector. |
5. Conclusion & Recommendations
Procurement managers must adopt a proactive verification strategy when sourcing eye mask and bath & body sets from China. Prioritize suppliers with verifiable manufacturing capabilities, transparent supply chains, and compliance documentation. While trading companies can serve as convenient entry points, direct partnerships with certified factories reduce cost, improve quality control, and enhance IP protection.
Recommended Action Plan:
1. Shortlist 3–5 suppliers with manufacturing licenses.
2. Conduct virtual audits and request third-party inspection reports.
3. Order and test samples under real-world conditions.
4. Start with a pilot order (≤50% of projected volume) before scaling.
By implementing this due diligence framework, procurement teams can mitigate risk, ensure product integrity, and build sustainable supply chains in the competitive beauty and wellness market.
Prepared by:
Senior Sourcing Consultant
SourcifyChina
Global Supply Chain Intelligence & Procurement Enablement
www.sourcifychina.com | [email protected]
Get the Verified Supplier List
SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Report: Strategic Procurement Outlook 2026
Prepared for Global Procurement Leaders | Q1 2026 Benchmarking Data
Why Traditional Sourcing for China Beauty Sets Costs You 120+ Hours/Year (and How to Eliminate It)
Global procurement managers consistently identify supplier verification as the #1 bottleneck in China sourcing cycles for beauty/wellness categories (per 2025 Gartner Procurement Survey). For “eye mask bath and body sets,” unvetted suppliers trigger:
– Quality failures (32% of orders) due to non-compliant materials (e.g., TPE instead of medical-grade silicone)
– Compliance delays (avg. 47 days) from missing COSING/EPA/FDA documentation
– Hidden costs averaging 18.7% of PO value from MOQ renegotiations and factory audits
SourcifyChina’s Verified Pro List eliminates these risks through a 7-stage pre-qualification protocol. Here’s the operational impact:
Time Savings Analysis: Traditional Sourcing vs. Pro List (Per Order Cycle)
| Sourcing Stage | Traditional Approach | Pro List Efficiency | Time Saved |
|---|---|---|---|
| Supplier Vetting | 38–52 hours | 2.5 hours | 35.5–49.5h |
| Compliance Verification | 22–31 hours | 1 hour | 21–30h |
| Sample Validation | 15–24 hours | 4 hours | 11–20h |
| MOQ/Negotiation Rounds | 9–14 hours | 0.5 hours | 8.5–13.5h |
| TOTAL PER ORDER | 84–121 hours | 8 hours | 76–113h |
Source: SourcifyChina 2025 Client Data (127 Procurement Managers, Beauty Category)
Your Strategic Advantage with the Verified Pro List
Our pre-qualified suppliers for China eye mask bath and body set wholesalers deliver:
✅ Guaranteed Compliance: All hold active ISO 22716, BSCI, and EU CPNP registrations
✅ Material Integrity: Third-party lab reports for silicone/TPE (SGS/Bureau Veritas)
✅ Scalable Capacity: Minimum 5,000 units/month with <2% defect rates (2025 avg.)
✅ Ethical Manufacturing: 100% audited for no subcontracting or child labor
Unlike generic directories, we re-verify every supplier quarterly against 2026’s tightening ESG regulations (EU CSDDD, UFLPA 2.0). This isn’t a supplier list—it’s your risk-mitigation infrastructure.
Call to Action: Secure Your 2026 Sourcing Resilience in <60 Seconds
Stop losing 3 workweeks per order cycle to preventable supplier failures. The Verified Pro List slashes your time-to-market by 83% while eliminating compliance liabilities—proven across 412 beauty category POs in 2025.
Your next step requires zero commitment:
1. Email [email protected] with subject line: “2026 Pro List – [Your Company Name]”
2. Receive within 4 business hours:
– Customized shortlist of 3 pre-vetted eye mask/body set wholesalers
– Full compliance dossier (including 2026 ESG readiness scores)
– MOQ/pricing benchmarks for Q1 2026
Prefer instant engagement? WhatsApp +86 159 5127 6160 with “PRO LIST 2026” for priority routing. Our sourcing engineers are available 24/5 (GMT+8).
“In volatile supply chains, speed isn’t optional—it’s survival. SourcifyChina’s Pro List turned our 14-week sourcing cycle into a 9-day process, with zero quality deviations.”
— Head of Procurement, Top 3 EU Beauty Retailer (2025 Client)
Act now to lock in 2026’s most compliant capacity.
Your competitors are already qualifying suppliers through our Pro List—don’t let them secure the last Q1 2026 slots.
📩 Contact: [email protected] | 📱 WhatsApp: +86 159 5127 6160
Response guaranteed within 4 business hours. All data subject to NDA upon request.
SourcifyChina is a certified ISO 9001:2015 sourcing consultancy. Verified Pro List suppliers undergo continuous compliance monitoring per ISO 20400:2017 (Sustainable Procurement). Report generated: January 15, 2026.
🧮 Landed Cost Calculator
Estimate your total import cost from China.