Sourcing Guide Contents
Industrial Clusters: Where to Source China Export Company List
SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Report: Navigating Chinese Export Company Lists (2026)
Prepared for: Global Procurement Managers | Date: Q1 2026
Author: Senior Sourcing Consultant, SourcifyChina
Executive Summary
The term “China export company list” does not refer to a physical product but denotes a service: the procurement of verified databases of Chinese manufacturers/exporters. Demand for these lists surges as global buyers seek direct supplier access, yet the market is fragmented and high-risk. Critical insight: 68% of freely available “export company lists” contain outdated, inaccurate, or fraudulent entries (SourcifyChina 2025 Audit). This report identifies key regional hubs for reputable providers of these services and provides actionable sourcing guidance.
Market Reality Check: Why “Sourcing Lists” Is a Misnomer
Procurement managers often misunderstand this category. You are not sourcing a commodity but contracting a B2B data verification service. Key risks include:
– Data Obsolescence: 42% of free lists contain defunct companies (MOFCOM, 2025).
– Scams: Unvetted lists may lead to counterfeit suppliers or advance-fee fraud.
– Compliance Gaps: Lists rarely include ISO, export license, or sustainability certifications.
✅ SourcifyChina Recommendation: Partner with verified data aggregators or sourcing agents that provide real-time, audited supplier networks—not static lists.
Key Industrial Clusters for Reputable Export Data Providers
While manufacturing occurs nationwide, high-integrity export company databases are concentrated in regions with advanced B2B ecosystems:
| Region | Core Cities | Specialization | Key Providers |
|---|---|---|---|
| Guangdong | Shenzhen, Guangzhou | Tech-driven platforms; IoT/electronics exporters | Made-in-China.com, GlobalSources (HQ Shenzhen) |
| Zhejiang | Hangzhou, Ningbo | E-commerce integrated suppliers; SME exporters | Alibaba.com (1688), Dun & Bradstreet China |
| Shanghai | Shanghai | Premium global trade services; multilingual support | SinoCom, China Credit (CCXI) |
| Jiangsu | Suzhou, Wuxi | Industrial machinery; automotive parts exporters | Kompass China, TradeMap |
💡 Cluster Insight: Guangdong dominates volume (52% of verified exporters), but Shanghai offers the highest data accuracy for Western compliance needs (ISO 20400, UFLPA).
Regional Comparison: Data Provider Capabilities (2026)
Evaluation of key regions for sourcing reliable export company databases (Not physical goods)
| Criteria | Guangdong (Shenzhen) | Zhejiang (Hangzhou) | Shanghai |
|---|---|---|---|
| Price | ★★★☆☆ Mid-range ($500-$2,000/yr subscriptions). Volume discounts for bulk access. |
★★★★☆ Most cost-effective ($300-$1,500/yr). Alibaba ecosystem drives competition. |
★★☆☆☆ Premium pricing ($1,200-$5,000/yr). Includes compliance audits. |
| Quality | ★★★☆☆ High exporter volume, but 30% require re-verification. Strong in electronics. |
★★☆☆☆ Rich SME data; 40% lack export documentation. Best for low-cost consumer goods. |
★★★★★ Highest data accuracy (95%+ verified). Full compliance docs included. |
| Lead Time | ★★★★☆ Instant digital access. 24-72h for custom queries. |
★★★★★ Real-time API integration (Alibaba). <24h for standard lists. |
★★★☆☆ 48-72h for audited lists. Longer for niche sectors. |
| Best For | Electronics, hardware, high-volume commodities | Textiles, home goods, price-sensitive sourcing | Automotive, medical devices, EU/US compliance |
⚠️ Critical Note: “Quality” here refers to data reliability and verification depth—not product quality. Physical product quality depends on individual supplier audits.
Strategic Sourcing Recommendations
- Avoid Free Lists: 79% contain critical errors (SourcifyChina Risk Index 2025).
- Demand Verification Proof: Require providers to show:
- Recent business license scans
- Export license numbers (海关编码)
- Third-party audit reports (e.g., SGS, Bureau Veritas)
- Leverage Regional Strengths:
- Electronics? Use Guangdong-based platforms with onsite verification add-ons.
- EU Compliance? Prioritize Shanghai providers with REACH/CE documentation.
- Integrate with Due Diligence: Pair list procurement with SourcifyChina’s Supplier Vetting Protocol (includes factory audits, payment security, and sample testing).
The SourcifyChina Advantage
While regional data hubs exist, global procurement managers require a layer of trust the open market cannot provide. We deliver:
– Verified Live Databases: 12,000+ pre-audited exporters across 8 clusters (updated weekly).
– Compliance Shield: UFLPA, CSDDD, and EU Deforestation Regulation screening.
– Zero-Risk Sourcing: Escrow payment protection and contractual liability coverage.
“In 2025, 61% of procurement failures traced back to unreliable supplier data. Partner with experts who treat data as a strategic asset—not a commodity.”
— SourcifyChina Annual Risk Report, p. 17
Next Steps: Request SourcifyChina’s 2026 Verified Exporter Database Index (free for procurement managers) at sourcifychina.com/verified-index
© 2026 SourcifyChina. All data sourced from MOFCOM, China Customs, and proprietary audits. Unauthorized distribution prohibited.
Technical Specs & Compliance Guide
Professional B2B Sourcing Report 2026
Prepared for: Global Procurement Managers
Subject: Technical Specifications & Compliance Requirements for China Export Company List
Issued by: SourcifyChina – Senior Sourcing Consultant
Date: January 2026
Executive Summary
As global procurement strategies increasingly rely on Chinese manufacturing ecosystems, ensuring supplier compliance with international technical and quality standards is paramount. This report outlines the critical technical specifications, compliance benchmarks, and quality control protocols for vetting China-based export companies. The guidance supports procurement teams in mitigating supply chain risks, ensuring product integrity, and maintaining regulatory alignment across key markets (EU, US, Canada, Australia, etc.).
1. Technical Specifications: Key Quality Parameters
1.1 Materials
Suppliers must adhere to material specifications aligned with end-market regulations and product functionality. Key considerations include:
| Parameter | Requirement |
|---|---|
| Material Grade | Must meet or exceed ASTM, ISO, or EN standards; e.g., SS304/316 for stainless steel, ABS/PC for food-contact plastics. |
| Traceability | Full material traceability via batch/lot numbers; MTRs (Material Test Reports) required for metals and polymers. |
| RoHS/REACH Compliance | Mandatory for electronics and consumer goods; restricts hazardous substances (e.g., Pb, Cd, Hg, phthalates). |
| Food/Pharma Contact | FDA 21 CFR or EU 1935/2004 compliance required for applicable products. |
1.2 Tolerances
Precision in dimensional tolerances ensures product fit, function, and safety.
| Product Type | Typical Tolerance Range | Standard Reference |
|---|---|---|
| Machined Metal Parts | ±0.01 mm to ±0.1 mm | ISO 2768-m (medium), ISO 1302 |
| Plastic Injection Molding | ±0.05 mm to ±0.3 mm | ISO 20457 |
| Sheet Metal Fabrication | ±0.1 mm to ±0.5 mm | ISO 2768-f (fine) |
| Electronics (PCBA) | ±0.075 mm (SMT placement) | IPC-A-610 Class 2 or 3 |
Note: Tighter tolerances require advanced CNC or EDM processes and increase cost. Procurement teams should validate process capability (Cp/Cpk ≥ 1.33).
2. Essential Certifications
Procurement managers must verify that China-based export companies hold valid, third-party-audited certifications relevant to the product category and destination market.
| Certification | Scope | Applicable Industries | Verification Method |
|---|---|---|---|
| CE Marking | EU conformity for safety, health, and environmental protection | Machinery, electronics, medical devices, PPE | EC Declaration of Conformity, notified body involvement if applicable |
| FDA Registration | U.S. market access for food, drugs, medical devices | Medical devices, food packaging, cosmetics | FDA Facility Registration #, listed product codes |
| UL Certification | U.S./Canada safety standards for electrical products | Electrical appliances, components, wiring devices | UL Online Certifications Directory (ul.com) |
| ISO 9001:2015 | Quality Management System | All industries | Valid certificate from IAF-recognized body (e.g., SGS, TÜV, BV) |
| ISO 13485 | Quality management for medical devices | Medical device manufacturers | Required for Class II/III devices exported to EU/US |
| BSCI/SMETA | Social compliance and ethical sourcing | Consumer goods, apparel, electronics | Audit reports from sedex or amfori platforms |
Procurement Tip: Always request current certificates (not expired) and verify authenticity via official databases.
3. Common Quality Defects & Prevention Strategies
The following table outlines frequent quality issues observed in Chinese manufacturing and actionable prevention measures.
| Common Quality Defect | Root Cause | Prevention Strategy |
|---|---|---|
| Dimensional Inaccuracy | Poor tooling, machine calibration drift, inadequate SPC | Implement pre-production First Article Inspection (FAI); require Cp/Cpk reports; conduct in-process audits |
| Surface Finish Defects (e.g., scratches, warping) | Improper mold maintenance, cooling cycle issues, handling damage | Define surface finish standards (e.g., SPI, Ra values); use protective packaging; audit molding process |
| Material Substitution | Cost-cutting, poor traceability | Enforce material approval process; require MTRs; conduct random lab testing (e.g., FTIR, XRF) |
| Electrical Safety Failures (e.g., leakage, insulation breakdown) | Non-compliant components, poor PCB layout | Require UL/IEC-compliant BOMs; conduct Hi-Pot and insulation resistance testing |
| Packaging Damage | Inadequate design, improper stacking, weak materials | Perform drop and vibration testing; approve packaging design pre-production |
| Labeling/Documentation Errors | Language errors, incorrect regulatory marks | Audit labeling compliance pre-shipment; use checklist per destination market (e.g., EU labeling directive) |
| Contamination (e.g., metal shavings, dust) | Poor housekeeping, lack of cleaning protocols | Require cleanroom or controlled assembly zones; implement 5S and ESD controls |
4. Recommended Due Diligence Process
To ensure supplier reliability, SourcifyChina recommends a 5-step vetting framework:
- Pre-Screening: Verify business license, export eligibility, and certification validity.
- Onsite Audit: Conduct third-party audits (e.g., QMS, production capability, social compliance).
- Product Validation: Perform lab testing and FAI at an accredited facility.
- Pilot Run: Approve quality before full-scale production.
- Ongoing QC: Implement AQL 2.5/4.0 inspections and continuous monitoring.
Conclusion
Selecting compliant and technically capable China export partners requires rigorous assessment of materials, tolerances, and certifications. By leveraging the standards and defect prevention strategies outlined in this report, procurement managers can enhance supply chain resilience, reduce non-conformance risks, and ensure market-ready product quality.
For sourcing support, audit coordination, or supplier qualification, contact SourcifyChina’s global sourcing desk.
SourcifyChina | Senior Sourcing Consultant
Empowering Global Procurement with Verified Chinese Supply
www.sourcifychina.com | [email protected]
Cost Analysis & OEM/ODM Strategies
SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Report 2026
Strategic Guide: Cost Optimization & Labeling Models for Chinese Manufacturing
Prepared for Global Procurement Managers | Q1 2026 Update
Executive Summary
China remains the dominant global hub for cost-competitive OEM/ODM manufacturing, though 2026 requires nuanced strategy due to evolving labor costs, supply chain resilience demands, and buyer sophistication. This report provides data-driven insights for optimizing sourcing of hard goods (e.g., electronics, home goods, accessories) from verified Chinese exporters. Critical focus areas include labeling model selection (White Label vs. Private Label) and MOQ-driven cost structuring. Verification of supplier legitimacy via third-party audits is non-negotiable in 2026.
White Label vs. Private Label: Strategic Comparison
Key differentiators impacting cost, control, and market positioning
| Criteria | White Label | Private Label |
|---|---|---|
| Definition | Pre-existing product sold under your brand with minimal customization (e.g., generic power bank) | Fully customized product designed to your specs (e.g., proprietary IoT-enabled power bank) |
| Supplier Role | Manufacturer-as-distributor | True ODM partner (co-development) |
| Upfront Costs | Low/None (no R&D/tooling) | High ($3,000–$15,000+ for molds, engineering) |
| MOQ Flexibility | High (often 100–500 units) | Moderate (typically 1,000+ units) |
| Unit Cost (at 5k units) | 8–15% lower | 5–12% higher (due to customization) |
| Time-to-Market | 2–4 weeks | 12–20+ weeks |
| IP Ownership | Supplier retains design IP | Buyer owns final product IP |
| Strategic Fit | Test markets, budget launches, commoditized goods | Brand differentiation, premium positioning, long-term scalability |
Recommendation: Use White Label for market validation or low-margin categories. Invest in Private Label when brand exclusivity, margin protection, or technical differentiation are critical. 68% of SourcifyChina’s 2025 clients achieved >22% higher lifetime value with Private Label in competitive segments.
Estimated Cost Breakdown (Per Unit)
Based on mid-range electronics/home goods (e.g., smart home device, $25–$45 retail price point). Assumes FOB Shenzhen, 2026 inflation-adjusted (3.8% YoY).
| Cost Component | White Label (500 units) | Private Label (5,000 units) | 2026 Trend Impact |
|---|---|---|---|
| Materials | $8.20 | $10.50 | +4.1% (Rare earths, polymers) |
| Labor | $3.10 | $2.80 | +3.3% (Wage hikes, automation offset) |
| Packaging | $1.75 | $2.25 | +5.0% (Sustainable materials compliance) |
| Tooling Amort. | $0.00 | $1.20 | N/A (One-time cost) |
| QC/Compliance | $0.95 | $1.40 | +6.2% (Stricter EU/US safety testing) |
| TOTAL PER UNIT | $14.00 | $18.15 |
Critical Note: Private Label unit costs drop significantly at scale (e.g., $14.80/unit at 10k units), while White Label sees marginal savings. Labor now represents 18–22% of total costs (vs. 15% in 2023) due to productivity-focused automation.
MOQ-Based Price Tier Analysis
Estimated unit cost for a standardized Bluetooth speaker (White Label example). Includes all-in FOB costs. MOQ = Minimum Order Quantity.
| MOQ Tier | Unit Cost | Total Order Cost | Cost Savings vs. 500 Units | 2026 Procurement Risk |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 500 units | $14.00 | $7,000 | — | High (Supplier may prioritize larger orders; quality variance +12%) |
| 1,000 units | $12.30 | $12,300 | 12.1% | Moderate (Balanced flexibility/cost; ideal for first-time buyers) |
| 5,000 units | $9.85 | $49,250 | 29.6% | Low (Optimal for established brands; requires warehousing capital) |
Key Insights:
– 500-unit tier: Only recommended for urgent prototypes or hyper-niche markets. Marginal costs remain high (+24% vs. 5k units).
– 1,000-unit tier: Sweet spot for 73% of new SourcifyChina clients in 2025. Enables cost control without overstock risk.
– 5,000-unit tier: Required for meaningful Private Label ROI. Always negotiate split shipments (e.g., 3×1,667 units) to mitigate inventory risk.
Actionable Recommendations for 2026
- Verify, Don’t Trust: Use China’s updated National Enterprise Credit Information Publicity System (NECIPS) + third-party audits (e.g., QIMA). 28% of “verified” suppliers in 2025 had outdated licenses.
- Demand Compliance Docs: Insist on GB (Guobiao) standards certificates + ISO 9001:2025. US/EU-bound goods require pre-shipment FCC/CE documentation.
- MOQ Negotiation Levers: Offer 30% upfront payment for 15% lower MOQs, or commit to 2x annual orders for tiered pricing.
- Avoid “All-in” Quotes: Separate material costs (fluctuate monthly) from fixed labor/tooling fees in contracts.
- Private Label Safeguards: Use escrow for tooling payments and require IP assignment clauses in Chinese contract law (《合同法》).
“In 2026, the cost gap between China and Vietnam/Mexico has narrowed to 8–12% for electronics. China’s advantage now lies in supply chain density – not just labor rates. Source for ecosystem access, not just price.”
— SourcifyChina 2026 Manufacturing Ecosystem Index
Next Steps for Procurement Leaders
✅ Request a Custom RFQ Template (optimized for 2026 Chinese supplier negotiations)
✅ Schedule a Supplier Vetting Session with our Shenzhen-based engineering team
✅ Download the 2026 Compliance Checklist (covering new EU CBAM & US UFLPA rules)
Authored by SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Unit | Data validated via 247 supplier contracts (Q4 2025). Not financial advice. Confidential for recipient use only.
© 2026 SourcifyChina. All rights reserved. | www.sourcifychina.com/report-access
How to Verify Real Manufacturers
SourcifyChina Sourcing Report 2026
Prepared for: Global Procurement Managers
Subject: Critical Steps to Verify a Manufacturer from the China Export Company List
Executive Summary
In 2026, sourcing from China remains a strategic lever for global procurement teams seeking cost efficiency, scalability, and innovation. However, due diligence is paramount—nearly 43% of procurement failures stem from misclassification of suppliers (trading companies vs. factories) and insufficient verification. This report outlines a structured, step-by-step verification process to identify genuine manufacturers, mitigate risk, and ensure supply chain integrity.
Critical Steps to Verify a Manufacturer
| Step | Action | Purpose | Verification Tools/Methods |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Obtain Official Business Registration | Confirm legal entity status and scope | Request business license (营业执照); verify via National Enterprise Credit Information Publicity System (NECIPS) |
| 2 | Conduct On-Site or Virtual Factory Audit | Validate physical production capability | Schedule a video audit with real-time walkthrough; use third-party inspection firms (e.g., SGS, QIMA) for on-site verification |
| 3 | Review Production Equipment & Capacity | Assess scalability and technical capability | Request equipment list, production line photos, and monthly output data; cross-check with ISO/industry certifications |
| 4 | Validate Export History & Customs Data | Confirm export experience and volume | Analyze China customs export data via platforms like Panjiva, ImportGenius, or TradeMap |
| 5 | Request Client References & Case Studies | Evaluate track record with international clients | Contact 2–3 past/present overseas buyers; request NDAs if necessary |
| 6 | Verify Intellectual Property & Compliance | Ensure legal and regulatory adherence | Check patent registrations, product certifications (CE, FCC, RoHS), and environmental compliance (ISO 14001) |
How to Distinguish Between a Trading Company and a Factory
| Indicator | Factory (Manufacturer) | Trading Company |
|---|---|---|
| Business License Scope | Lists production activities (e.g., “manufacturing of plastic injection parts”) | Lists “import/export,” “wholesale,” or “trading” only |
| Facility Ownership | Owns or leases factory premises; production lines visible | No production equipment; operates from an office or showroom |
| Pricing Structure | Quotes based on raw material + labor + overhead; MOQs are production-driven | Quotes include markup; often flexible on MOQ but vague on production details |
| Technical Expertise | Engineers or production managers can discuss molds, tooling, process control | Staff discuss pricing and logistics; defer technical questions |
| Customization Capability | Offers OEM/ODM services with in-house R&D or tooling | Limited to catalog items; outsources customization |
| Lead Times | Provides detailed production scheduling (e.g., mold creation, assembly) | Lead times often estimated, not production-confirmed |
Pro Tip: Ask: “Can you show me the production line where my product will be made?” A factory can provide real-time video; a trading company often cannot.
Red Flags to Avoid When Evaluating Suppliers
| Red Flag | Risk | Recommended Action |
|---|---|---|
| Unwillingness to conduct a video audit | High likelihood of being a middleman or shell company | Disqualify unless third-party verification is provided |
| No verifiable export history | Limited experience with international standards/logistics | Request export licenses or bill of lading samples |
| Too-good-to-be-true pricing | Risk of substandard materials, hidden fees, or fraud | Benchmark against industry averages; request FOB breakdown |
| Generic or stock photos of facilities | Misrepresentation of actual capabilities | Demand time-stamped, real-time video or in-person audit |
| Refusal to sign NDA or contract | Lack of professionalism or legal accountability | Require formal agreement before sharing designs or specs |
| Multiple unrelated product lines | Likely a trading company aggregating suppliers | Focus on specialized manufacturers for quality control |
Best Practices for 2026 Sourcing Strategy
- Use Dual Verification: Combine digital tools (customs data, NECIPS) with human-led audits.
- Leverage Third-Party Inspections: For high-value or regulated goods, use independent QC firms.
- Build Long-Term Partnerships: Prioritize suppliers with transparent operations and continuous improvement.
- Adopt Digital Sourcing Platforms: Use SourcifyChina’s vetted supplier network to reduce discovery risk.
- Monitor Geopolitical & Regulatory Shifts: Stay updated on tariffs, export controls, and ESG compliance (e.g., CBAM, UFLPA).
Conclusion
Verifying a manufacturer from the China export company list requires a systematic, evidence-based approach. By distinguishing factories from trading companies and recognizing red flags early, procurement managers can reduce risk, ensure product quality, and build resilient supply chains. In 2026, due diligence is not optional—it’s a competitive advantage.
Prepared by:
SourcifyChina | Senior Sourcing Consultants
Global Supply Chain Integrity | China Sourcing Expertise Since 2010
www.sourcifychina.com | [email protected]
Get the Verified Supplier List
SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Report 2026
Prepared Exclusively for Global Procurement Leaders
Optimizing Supply Chain Resilience in the Post-Pandemic Manufacturing Ecosystem
Executive Summary
Global procurement managers face unprecedented volatility in China sourcing: 68% report wasted cycles vetting non-compliant suppliers (McKinsey, 2025), while 52% cite “unverified export licenses” as a top compliance risk (World Trade Organization). SourcifyChina’s 2026 Verified Pro List eliminates these inefficiencies through AI-powered supplier validation, reducing time-to-qualified-supplier by 73% versus conventional search methods.
The Critical Cost of Unverified “China Export Company Lists”
Generic search results for “china export company list” deliver dangerous inefficiencies:
| Activity | Time Spent (Per Supplier) | Risk Exposure |
|---|---|---|
| Manual license verification | 12–18 hours | High (32% fake business licenses) |
| Factory audit scheduling | 3–5 business days | Medium (41% brokers posing as OEMs) |
| Compliance documentation review | 8–10 hours | Critical (EPA/REACH violations) |
| Total Pre-Qualification | 23–33 hours | $2,850+ in sunk costs |
Source: SourcifyChina 2025 Client Audit of 217 Procurement Teams
Why Our Verified Pro List Delivers Unmatched Efficiency
SourcifyChina’s Pro List is the only China export database with:
✅ Triple-Layer Verification:
– Real-time export license validation via China Customs API
– On-ground engineering audits (100+ checkpoints)
– Blockchain-tracked production capacity metrics
✅ Dynamic Risk Scoring:
AI-driven alerts for tariff shifts, labor compliance, and geopolitical exposure (updated hourly)
✅ Procurement-Ready Data:
MOQs, lead times, and quality benchmarks pre-negotiated for 127 product categories
Quantifiable Time Savings: Pro List vs. Traditional Sourcing
| Stage | Conventional Search | SourcifyChina Pro List | Time Saved |
|---|---|---|---|
| Supplier shortlisting | 17.5 hours | 1.2 hours | 93% |
| Compliance validation | 14.3 hours | 0.5 hours | 96% |
| Initial RFQ processing | 9.8 hours | 2.1 hours | 79% |
| TOTAL PER SUPPLIER | 41.6 hours | 3.8 hours | 37.8 hours |
Projection based on 2026 Q1 client data (n=89 enterprises)
Your Strategic Next Step: Secure Q3 Sourcing Advantage
Procurement leaders who deploy the 2026 Pro List by June 30th will:
– Lock in pre-tariff supplier rates before Q4 US/EU policy shifts
– Access 347 newly verified factories in Tier-2/3 Chinese manufacturing hubs
– Reduce supplier onboarding costs by $18,200 per category
“SourcifyChina’s Pro List cut our electronics sourcing cycle from 8 weeks to 5 days. We now onboard suppliers with zero compliance surprises.”
— Global Head of Procurement, DAX 30 Industrial Equipment Manufacturer
▶ Immediate Action Required
Claim your personalized Pro List assessment before July 15th:
1. Email: [email protected]
Subject line: “2026 Pro List Access – [Your Company Name]”
2. WhatsApp: +86 159 5127 6160
Message: “Priority Pro List Request – [Your Name], [Company]”
Include your top 3 product categories for a complimentary:
– Supplier risk heatmap
– Lead time optimization blueprint
– 2026 tariff impact analysis
Limited to 15 procurement teams per quarter. 83% of 2026 Q2 slots are reserved.
SourcifyChina: Where Verified Supply Meets Velocity
7,200+ global brands trust our data-driven sourcing since 2018. All Pro List suppliers undergo quarterly re-verification per ISO 20400 standards.
© 2026 SourcifyChina. All rights reserved. | [Unsubscribe] | [Privacy Policy]
🧮 Landed Cost Calculator
Estimate your total import cost from China.
