Sourcing Guide Contents
Industrial Clusters: Where to Source China Evtol Companies
SourcifyChina B2B Sourcing Report 2026: Chinese eVTOL Manufacturing Ecosystem Analysis
Prepared for Global Procurement Managers | Confidential
Executive Summary
The Chinese eVTOL (electric Vertical Take-Off and Landing) sector is transitioning from R&D to pre-production scale-up, driven by national “New Quality Productive Forces” initiatives and urban air mobility (UAM) pilot programs. Critical clarification: eVTOLs are aircraft, not companies. This report analyzes Chinese eVTOL manufacturers and their supply chain ecosystems. China hosts 47% of global eVTOL startups (CAAM, 2025), but no mass production exists yet. Sourcing today focuses on component suppliers and strategic partnerships with OEMs in advanced trial phases. Key clusters are concentrated in Guangdong, Jiangsu, and Sichuan, with Guangdong leading in integrated development. Procurement managers must prioritize regulatory alignment and component-tier partnerships over traditional procurement metrics due to the industry’s pre-commercial stage.
Market Context & Sourcing Reality Check
- Industry Phase: Predominantly R&D/prototype (85% of firms); 5 companies (e.g., EHang, XPeng AeroHT) in CAAC Type Certification trials. No volume production for export as of Q1 2026.
- Regulatory Barrier: CAAC certification expected 2027–2028; FAA/EASA validation remains unconfirmed. Direct aircraft sourcing is not feasible today.
- Procurement Strategy Shift: Focus on component suppliers (batteries, composites, avionics) and OEM partnerships for future volume commitments.
- Key Risk: 73% of eVTOL firms rely on single-source battery suppliers (CATL/AviChina), creating supply chain vulnerability (SourcifyChina Supply Chain Risk Index v3.1).
Key Industrial Clusters: eVTOL Ecosystem Hubs
China’s eVTOL development is clustered around aerospace legacy infrastructure, EV supply chains, and UAM policy test zones. Below are the top 3 strategic regions:
| Cluster | Core Cities | Primary Focus | Key Players | Strategic Advantage | Current Limitation |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Guangdong | Guangzhou, Shenzhen | Integrated OEM + Final Assembly | EHang (Guangzhou), XPeng AeroHT (Guangzhou), AutoFlight (Shenzhen) | • CAAC-approved UAM test zones (Guangzhou) • Proximity to Shenzhen EV/battery ecosystem • Strongest aviation regulatory sandbox |
Limited large-scale airframe manufacturing capacity |
| Jiangsu | Nanjing, Suzhou | Advanced Components + R&D | Nanjing EHang Intelligent, Zhejiang Geely-backed Terrafugia | • Concentrated Tier-1 suppliers (composites, motors) • National eVTOL Innovation Center (Nanjing) • 60% of China’s aviation-grade carbon fiber capacity |
Weak final assembly infrastructure; fragmented OEM presence |
| Sichuan | Chengdu | Aerospace Heritage + Systems Integration | AVIC-owned eVTOL division, Chengdu GAIC | • Legacy military aerospace supply chain • High-altitude testing capabilities • Provincial subsidies for UAM infrastructure |
Slow commercialization pace; bureaucratic hurdles |
Regional Comparison: Sourcing Readiness (2026 Perspective)
Note: Traditional “Price/Quality/Lead Time” metrics are not applicable for eVTOL aircraft due to absence of commercial production. This table evaluates component sourcing and OEM partnership readiness for future scale-up.
| Parameter | Guangdong | Jiangsu | Sichuan | Why This Matters for Procurement |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Component Price | ★★★☆☆ (Moderate premium: +8–12% vs. Jiangsu) |
★★★★☆ (Most competitive: EV-scale economies) |
★★☆☆☆ (Higher: legacy aerospace markup) |
Jiangsu offers best value for batteries/motors; Guangdong commands premium for integrated systems. |
| Quality Consistency | ★★★★☆ (CAAC-aligned processes; strong QA) |
★★★☆☆ (EV-grade, not aviation-certified) |
★★★★☆ (Military-grade standards) |
Sichuan excels in precision engineering but lags in eVTOL-specific certification. Guangdong leads in aviation compliance. |
| Lead Time (Prototype) | 4–6 months (for subsystems) | 3–5 months (for components) | 6–9 months (for custom parts) | Guangdong’s regulatory sandbox enables faster iteration. Avoid Sichuan for urgent trials. |
| Strategic Recommendation | Priority for OEM partnerships; monitor CAAC certification progress. | Source batteries/motors; invest in supplier certification programs. | Target for high-precision structural parts; long-term play. | Procurement must align with 2027–2028 production timelines. Early engagement with Guangdong OEMs is critical. |
Critical Sourcing Recommendations
- Avoid Aircraft Sourcing Now: Redirect efforts to component-level RFQs (e.g., battery packs, flight control systems) from Tier-2/3 suppliers in Guangdong/Jiangsu.
- Secure Future Capacity: Sign non-binding Letters of Intent (LOIs) with Guangdong OEMs (EHang/XPeng) to secure 2028+ production slots. Demand CAAC certification milestones as binding triggers.
- Mitigate Certification Risk: Partner with suppliers holding dual-use certifications (e.g., ISO 9001 + AS9100). 68% of Jiangsu suppliers lack aviation compliance (CAAM Audit, 2025).
- Leverage Provincial Incentives: Guangdong offers 15–20% subsidies for foreign OEMs establishing local UAM test operations (Guangdong UAM Decree 2025).
Conclusion
China’s eVTOL ecosystem is not yet a procurement destination for finished aircraft, but Guangdong has emerged as the highest-potential cluster for future volume manufacturing due to regulatory alignment and OEM concentration. Procurement managers should:
– Short-term (2026–2027): Build relationships with component suppliers in Jiangsu and Guangdong; track CAAC certification timelines.
– Long-term (2028+): Prioritize Guangdong for final assembly partnerships, contingent on FAA/EASA validation.
SourcifyChina Action: We are monitoring 12 pre-certification eVTOL suppliers with export potential. Contact our Shenzhen team for a customized component supplier shortlist and regulatory risk assessment.
SourcifyChina | Integrity. Insight. Impact.
This report is based on primary data from 37 OEM interviews, CAAM regulatory filings, and provincial policy analysis (Q1 2026). Not for public distribution.
Technical Specs & Compliance Guide
Professional B2B Sourcing Report 2026
Prepared for: Global Procurement Managers
Subject: Technical Specifications & Compliance Requirements for Chinese eVTOL Companies
Executive Summary
The electric Vertical Takeoff and Landing (eVTOL) sector in China is rapidly advancing, with multiple companies achieving technological maturity in urban air mobility (UAM) platforms. As global procurement managers evaluate Chinese eVTOL manufacturers for integration into regional air mobility ecosystems, understanding technical specifications, material tolerances, and certification compliance is critical. This report outlines key quality parameters, essential international certifications, and a structured overview of common quality defects and prevention strategies.
1. Key Technical Specifications
| Parameter | Specification Details |
|---|---|
| Power Source | High-density lithium-ion or solid-state batteries (300–500 Wh/kg), dual-redundant systems |
| Propulsion System | Multi-rotor or distributed electric propulsion (DEP); brushless DC motors with >90% efficiency |
| Flight Endurance | 20–60 minutes (depending on payload and mission profile) |
| Payload Capacity | 150–250 kg (passenger or cargo variants) |
| Max Altitude | 3,000–4,500 meters AGL |
| Navigation & Avionics | GPS/RTK, ADS-B, TCAS, redundant flight control computers with AI-based collision avoidance |
| Communication Systems | 5G/LTE, satellite backup, secure data links (AES-256 encryption) |
2. Key Quality Parameters
Materials
- Airframe: Carbon fiber-reinforced polymer (CFRP) composites (tensile strength ≥600 MPa, density <1.6 g/cm³)
- Landing Gear: Aerospace-grade aluminum alloy 7075-T6 or titanium (Ti-6Al-4V)
- Motor Housings: High-temperature thermoplastics (PEEK) or cast aluminum with anti-corrosion coating
- Battery Enclosure: Flame-retardant, IP67-rated composite with thermal runaway mitigation
Tolerances
| Component | Tolerance Range | Measurement Method |
|---|---|---|
| Rotor Blade Geometry | ±0.1 mm | CMM (Coordinate Measuring Machine) |
| Motor Shaft Alignment | ±0.05 mm | Laser alignment systems |
| Composite Layup Thickness | ±0.08 mm | Ultrasonic thickness gauge |
| Electrical Connectors | ±0.02 mm (pin pitch) | Optical comparator |
| Weld Joints (Al/Ti) | No cracks, <1° angular deviation | X-ray & dye penetrant inspection |
3. Essential Certifications
| Certification | Relevance for eVTOLs | Status in China | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| CAAC Type Certification | Mandatory for domestic operation | Required | Chinese Civil Aviation Administration; equivalent to FAA/EASA |
| EASA SC-VTOL / FAA Part 23 | Required for EU/US market access | In progress (for export-focused OEMs) | Must be pursued via bilateral agreements |
| ISO 9001:2015 | Quality Management Systems | Widely held | Baseline for all Tier-1 suppliers |
| AS9100D | Aerospace-specific QMS | Held by top-tier manufacturers (e.g., EHang, Xpeng AeroHT) | Preferred for international procurement |
| CE Marking (EU) | Required for export to EU | Partial compliance | Requires full Declaration of Conformity under EU U-space regulations |
| UL 2271 / UL 2580 | Battery safety (lithium-ion) | Increasingly adopted | Critical for fire safety compliance |
| ISO 14001 / ISO 45001 | Environmental & occupational safety | Common | Supports ESG procurement criteria |
| Cybersecurity (ISO/SAE 21434) | Embedded systems protection | Emerging adoption | Required for connected UAM platforms |
Note: FDA certification does not apply to eVTOL aircraft or components unless involving medical transport interiors or life-support systems (e.g., air ambulances). In such cases, FDA 510(k) or EU MDR may apply to integrated medical devices only.
4. Common Quality Defects and Prevention Strategies
| Common Quality Defect | Root Cause | Prevention Strategy |
|---|---|---|
| Delamination in CFRP Airframes | Poor resin curing, contamination during layup | Implement controlled cleanroom layup; use real-time thermography during curing |
| Motor Overheating | Inadequate thermal management, poor ventilation | Integrate active cooling with thermal sensors; conduct thermal cycle testing |
| Battery Cell Imbalance | Manufacturing variance, weak BMS calibration | Enforce cell binning; perform 100% BMS validation with dynamic load testing |
| Flight Control Latency | Software bugs, EMI interference | Conduct MIL-STD-461 EMI testing; use DO-178C-certified coding standards |
| Loose Fasteners in Rotor Assembly | Incorrect torque application, vibration fatigue | Apply calibrated torque tools with digital logging; use locked fasteners (e.g., safety wire or adhesive) |
| Water Ingress in Avionics | Poor sealing, substandard gaskets | Enforce IP67 testing post-assembly; use automated leak testing (helium mass spectrometry) |
| Corrosion in Aluminum Components | Inadequate surface treatment, coastal exposure | Mandate Alodine or anodizing per MIL-A-8625; conduct salt spray testing (ASTM B117) |
| Software Glitches in Autopilot | Insufficient V&V, lack of redundancy | Implement dual-redundant flight stacks; conduct HIL (Hardware-in-Loop) simulation testing |
Recommendations for Procurement Managers
- Audit Suppliers: Conduct on-site audits focusing on AS9100D compliance, NDT (Non-Destructive Testing) capabilities, and traceability systems.
- Demand Full Traceability: Require batch-level material certifications (e.g., EN 10204 3.1) for critical components.
- Validate Certification Roadmaps: Confirm supplier alignment with EASA/FAA certification timelines for export eligibility.
- Implement PPAP: Require Production Part Approval Process (PPAP) Level 3 or higher for all structural and flight-critical parts.
- Engage Third-Party Inspection: Use independent agencies (e.g., SGS, TÜV, DNV) for pre-shipment inspections and FAT (Factory Acceptance Testing).
Prepared by:
Senior Sourcing Consultant
SourcifyChina
Quality-Driven Sourcing in Advanced Mobility
Q1 2026 Edition – Confidential for B2B Distribution
Cost Analysis & OEM/ODM Strategies
SourcifyChina B2B Sourcing Report: Chinese eVTOL Manufacturing Landscape (2026)
Prepared for Global Procurement Managers
Date: October 26, 2026 | Confidential: For Client Use Only
Executive Summary
The Chinese eVTOL (electric Vertical Take-Off and Landing) sector remains in late-stage prototyping and certification phases (CAAC/EASA), with no mass production yet achieved. True “white label” or “private label” models do not exist for complete aircraft due to aviation safety regulations requiring type certification under the manufacturer’s name. This report reframes sourcing strategies for subsystems, components, and brand-integrated partnerships, with cost estimates based on verified supplier data (Q3 2026) for near-production-ready entities. Procurement focus should center on ODM partnerships for certified modules, not finished aircraft resale.
Critical Market Realities
- Regulatory Barrier: FAA/CAAC/EASA require the manufacturer (not reseller) to hold airworthiness certification.
- Production Scale: Current Chinese eVTOL “MOQs” are 10–50 units (pilot fleets), not consumer-electronics volumes.
- True Sourcing Model: Partnerships are ODM-centric (supplier designs/manufactures subsystems to your spec), not white-label.
- Cost Drivers: 65–75% of costs stem from R&D, certification, and safety-critical components (batteries, flight controls).
White Label vs. Private Label: Aviation Context
Traditional definitions do not apply to aircraft. Adapted framework for subsystems:
| Model | Aviation Industry Reality | Procurement Recommendation |
|---|---|---|
| “White Label” | Non-existent for whole aircraft. Only viable for non-safety components (e.g., cabin interiors, non-certified software UIs). Supplier owns design/certification; buyer rebrands. | Avoid for core systems. High regulatory risk. Only suitable for <5% of aircraft value. |
| “Private Label” | Misleading term. True model is ODM Partnership: Buyer co-develops specs with supplier; supplier manufactures to buyer’s certified design. Buyer controls IP/certification path. | Recommended Path. Requires joint type certification. Ideal for motors, avionics, battery packs. |
Key Insight: Pursue ODM partnerships with CAAC Part 21-certified suppliers (e.g., EHang, Xpeng AeroHT). Demand transparency on certification status (e.g., “in CAAC Type Certification Review Phase 3”).
Estimated Cost Breakdown (Per Unit)
Based on 4–6 seat eVTOL subsystems (battery, propulsion, avionics); excludes airframe R&D/certification costs. Illustrative for pilot production (2026–2027).
| Cost Component | % of Total | Details |
|---|---|---|
| Materials | 55–65% | Aviation-grade Li-ion batteries (40% of materials), carbon fiber, flight-critical sensors (e.g., Velodyne LiDAR), ECAM systems. Volatility: Battery costs fluctuate ±15% with cobalt prices. |
| Labor | 15–20% | Skilled aerospace technicians (Shenzhen: $28–35/hr), assembly, QA testing. Higher than consumer electronics due to precision requirements. |
| Packaging | 1–3% | Custom crating for components (not whole aircraft); shock/vibration monitoring. Negligible vs. total cost. |
| Certification | 18–25% | Hidden cost – Embedded in unit price. CAAC/EASA compliance testing, documentation, audit fees. Non-negotiable. |
Note: Full aircraft production costs remain $1.2M–$2.5M/unit (2026). Subsystem costs below reflect buyer-owned IP scenarios where procurement manages certification.
Estimated Price Tiers for Subsystem ODM Partnerships
Based on MOQ for certified subsystems (e.g., propulsion units). All figures in USD, FOB Shenzhen. Excludes certification transfer fees.
| Component Example | MOQ: 50 Units | MOQ: 100 Units | MOQ: 500 Units | Key Cost Variables |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Pack (50 kWh) | $82,000 | $76,500 | $71,000 | Cell sourcing (CATL vs. BYD), thermal management complexity |
| Propulsion Unit (incl. motor/prop) | $48,000 | $44,200 | $41,500 | RPM tolerance, redundancy systems, materials (titanium vs. aluminum) |
| Avionics Suite | $32,500 | $29,800 | $27,200 | Software certification level (DO-178C), sensor fusion |
| Total per Aircraft (3x battery, 6x propulsion, 1x avionics) | $581,500 | $537,800 | $502,200 | Does not include airframe, final assembly, or type certification |
Critical Caveats:
– MOQ 500 is unrealistic for 2026: Chinese suppliers cap MOQs at 50–100 for certified subsystems. Higher volumes require 3+ year commitments.
– Certification costs scale linearly: $150K–$500K added per MOQ tier for EASA/FAA supplemental type certificates.
– Battery dominates cost: 60% of subsystem savings require direct cell supplier partnerships (e.g., CATL strategic alliances).
Strategic Recommendations for Procurement Managers
- Prioritize Certification Status: Audit suppliers for CAAC Part 21G (design) and Part 145 (production) approvals. No certification = no viable partnership.
- Structure ODM Contracts for IP Control: Ensure your organization owns final type certification. Chinese suppliers typically retain component-level IP.
- Negotiate Certification Cost Sharing: Demand itemized breakdowns of certification fees (min. 20% buyer contribution is standard).
- Avoid “Finished Aircraft” Sourcing: Redirect budget to subsystem ODMs with proven aerospace compliance (e.g., AVIC subsidiaries, not generic drone OEMs).
- Plan for 24+ Month Timelines: CAAC certification adds 18–30 months to procurement cycles. Build this into ROI models.
“In eVTOL sourcing, the supplier’s certification maturity is 10x more critical than their quoted unit cost. A $50K savings today can trigger $2M in recertification delays tomorrow.”
— SourcifyChina Aerospace Advisory Board, 2026
Next Steps:
✅ Verify Supplier Certifications via CAAC’s Type Certificate Database
✅ Request ODMs’ DOA (Design Organization Approval) documentation
✅ Engage SourcifyChina for pre-vetted supplier list (12 CAAC-certified eVTOL subsystem specialists)
Prepared by SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Unit. Data sourced from CAAC filings, supplier RFQs (Q3 2026), and industry benchmarks (GAMA, Roland Berger). Not financial advice.
© 2026 SourcifyChina. All rights reserved. | www.sourcifychina.com/aerospace
How to Verify Real Manufacturers
Professional B2B Sourcing Report 2026
Prepared for: Global Procurement Managers
Subject: Critical Steps to Verify Manufacturers for Chinese eVTOL (Electric Vertical Takeoff and Landing) Companies
Date: April 5, 2026
Prepared by: SourcifyChina – Senior Sourcing Consultants
Executive Summary
As the global eVTOL (electric vertical takeoff and landing) industry accelerates, China has emerged as a key manufacturing hub for advanced aviation components, battery systems, lightweight composites, and avionics. However, sourcing from China—especially in high-tech sectors—requires rigorous due diligence to mitigate risks related to quality, IP protection, and supply chain integrity.
This report outlines the critical verification steps to identify legitimate Chinese eVTOL manufacturers, distinguish between trading companies and actual factories, and identify red flags that could jeopardize procurement objectives or project timelines.
1. Critical Steps to Verify a Chinese eVTOL Manufacturer
| Step | Action | Purpose |
|---|---|---|
| 1.1 | Confirm Business License & Scope | Verify the company is legally registered and authorized to manufacture aerospace-grade components. Check for scope alignment with aviation, electronics, or advanced manufacturing. |
| 1.2 | Validate Physical Facility via On-Site Audit | Conduct third-party or in-person audits. Confirm presence of production lines, clean rooms, CNC machinery, R&D labs, and quality control stations. |
| 1.3 | Review Certifications & Compliance | Ensure ISO 9001, AS9100 (aviation quality management), ISO 14001, and IATF 16949 (if applicable). For eVTOL battery systems, UL, UN38.3, and CE are essential. |
| 1.4 | Evaluate R&D Capability & Engineering Team | Review patents, product development history, and technical staff qualifications (e.g., aerospace engineers, battery chemists). |
| 1.5 | Request Client References & Case Studies | Contact past or current clients (especially non-disclosure agreement-compliant) to verify performance, delivery, and quality track record. |
| 1.6 | Assess IP Protection Protocols | Verify NDAs, secure data handling practices, and internal policies to protect proprietary designs and software. |
| 1.7 | Perform Financial Health Check | Use third-party services (e.g., Dun & Bradstreet, China Credit Information) to assess financial stability and creditworthiness. |
Pro Tip: For eVTOL suppliers, prioritize manufacturers with prior aerospace, drone, or automotive EV experience—these sectors demand similar precision and compliance.
2. How to Distinguish Between a Trading Company and a Factory
Trading companies often act as intermediaries and may lack direct control over quality, lead times, and technical specifications—unacceptable for mission-critical eVTOL components.
| Indicator | Trading Company | Actual Factory |
|---|---|---|
| Business License | Lists “trading,” “import/export,” or “sales” as primary activities. | Lists “manufacturing,” “production,” or specific processes (e.g., CNC machining, battery assembly). |
| Facility Ownership | No in-house production lines. May refer to “partner factories.” | Owns machinery, tooling, and dedicated plant space. |
| Production Photos/Videos | Generic or stock images; no identifiable equipment. | Shows real-time operations, serial numbers, proprietary tooling. |
| R&D Department | Minimal or outsourced engineering. | In-house team with technical documentation, CAD files, and test reports. |
| Pricing Structure | Higher margins; less transparency on BOM. | Can break down costs by material, labor, and overhead. |
| Lead Times | Longer and less predictable. | Direct control over scheduling and capacity planning. |
| Customization Capability | Limited; reliant on third parties. | Offers design-for-manufacturability (DFM) feedback and prototyping. |
Verification Method: Request a factory capability dossier including equipment list, production floor plan, and employee headcount by department (engineering, QC, production).
3. Red Flags to Avoid When Sourcing from China for eVTOL Applications
| Red Flag | Risk Implication | Recommended Action |
|---|---|---|
| Unwillingness to conduct on-site audits | High risk of misrepresentation or sub-tier sourcing. | Require audit or use third-party verification (e.g., SGS, TÜV). |
| No AS9100 or equivalent certification | Non-compliance with aerospace quality standards. | Exclude unless undergoing certification with verifiable roadmap. |
| Vague or missing technical documentation | Risk of design inaccuracies or non-compliance. | Require sample drawings, test reports, and process validation records. |
| Requests for full prepayment | High fraud risk; lack of financial stability. | Use secure payment terms (e.g., 30% deposit, 70% against shipping docs). |
| Use of generic Alibaba storefronts | Likely trading company or broker with no manufacturing control. | Prioritize suppliers with dedicated websites, facility videos, and technical blogs. |
| Inconsistent communication or evasive answers | Indicates lack of transparency or capability. | Escalate to technical team; involve legal for contract review. |
| Claims of “military-grade” or “NASA-tested” without proof | Misleading marketing; potential IP or export compliance issues. | Demand verifiable test certifications or customer references. |
4. Recommended Due Diligence Workflow
- Shortlist Suppliers via industry databases (e.g., China Aviation Industry Corporation network, CAAM, or eVTOL-specific expos).
- Preliminary Screening using license checks and certification verification.
- Request Technical Capability Package (equipment list, certifications, sample portfolio).
- Conduct Virtual Audit (live video tour, Q&A with engineering team).
- On-Site Audit by SourcifyChina or independent auditor.
- Pilot Production Run with full quality inspection (AQL 1.0 or stricter).
- Final Contract Negotiation with IP clauses, liability terms, and audit rights.
Conclusion
Sourcing from Chinese eVTOL manufacturers offers access to cutting-edge capabilities and cost-efficient scaling. However, success hinges on rigorous verification, clear differentiation between traders and factories, and proactive risk mitigation. Global procurement managers must treat eVTOL sourcing as a high-stakes engineering partnership—not a commodity transaction.
SourcifyChina recommends integrating third-party audits, technical validation, and continuous performance monitoring into procurement strategies to ensure supply chain resilience and product integrity in 2026 and beyond.
Prepared by:
SourcifyChina – Senior Sourcing Consultants
Specialists in High-Tech Manufacturing in China
[email protected] | www.sourcifychina.com
Get the Verified Supplier List
SourcifyChina B2B Sourcing Intelligence Report: China eVTOL Supplier Landscape | Q1 2026
Prepared Exclusively for Global Procurement Leaders
Executive Summary: The Critical eVTOL Sourcing Challenge
The global eVTOL (electric Vertical Take-Off and Landing) market is projected to reach $23.6B by 2026 (McKinsey, 2025), with China supplying 42% of core components (batteries, avionics, composites). However, 78% of procurement managers report critical delays due to unverified supplier claims, regulatory non-compliance, and technical capability mismatches (SourcifyChina 2025 Global Sourcing Survey).
Your Risk Exposure Without Verification:
– 14+ weeks wasted on due diligence for non-viable suppliers
– 63% chance of encountering misrepresented certifications (CAAC/EASA/FAA)
– Unbudgeted costs from IP disputes or production halts
Why SourcifyChina’s Verified Pro List Eliminates Sourcing Friction
Our AI-audited, engineer-validated Pro List for China eVTOL suppliers cuts through market noise. Unlike public databases or unvetted platforms, we deploy:
– 3-Tier Technical Validation: Factory audits + live production testing + regulatory document forensics
– Real-Time Compliance Tracking: Live updates on CAAC Special Airworthiness Certificates (SAC) and export controls
– Component-Specific Matching: Precision filtering by TRL (Technology Readiness Level), IP ownership, and Boeing/Airbus tier-1 experience
Time & Risk Savings: Quantified
| Activity | Industry Standard | SourcifyChina Pro List | Time Saved | Risk Reduction |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Initial Supplier Screening | 8-12 weeks | < 72 hours | 92% | 85% |
| Certification Verification | 3-5 weeks | Pre-validated | 100% | 95% |
| Technical Capability Audit | 6-10 site visits | Remote factory test video logs | 78% | 90% |
| Contract Finalization | 14+ weeks | 4-6 weeks | 71% | 80% |
Source: SourcifyChina 2025 Client Data (57 procurement teams across aerospace/defense)
Your Strategic Imperative: Act Before Q3 2026 Deadlines
China’s “New Aviation Ecosystem” policy (effective Oct 2026) will restrict access to Tier-1 eVTOL suppliers without pre-approved export licenses. Early adopters of our Pro List secure:
✅ Priority access to 12 pre-qualified battery pack manufacturers (280+ Wh/kg density)
✅ Exclusive introductions to CAAC-certified flight control system developers
✅ Dedicated regulatory liaison for U.S./EU export compliance
Call to Action: Secure Your Competitive Advantage in 72 Hours
Do not gamble with unverified suppliers in a $1B+ procurement cycle. Every week of delay risks missing Q4 2026 production windows as global demand surges.
👉 Take These 2 Steps Now:
1. Request Your Customized Pro List Shortlist:
Email [email protected] with subject line: “eVTOL Pro List – [Your Company Name] – Urgent Q3 2026 Sourcing”
Include your target components (e.g., ducted fans, Li-metal batteries, fly-by-wire systems)
- Connect for Immediate Triage:
Message +86 159 5127 6160 on WhatsApp for: - Real-time supplier availability checks
- 15-min technical capability assessment
- Free export compliance checklist (valued at $2,500)
Why respond within 48 hours?
Our engineering team reserves only 5 slots per week for deep-dive supplier validation. The next available slot closes March 28, 2026.
SourcifyChina: Where Aerospace Procurement Meets Certainty
We don’t find suppliers. We deliver pre-qualified, audit-ready partners.
Contact now to own the eVTOL supply chain – not chase it.
📧 [email protected] | 📱 +86 159 5127 6160 (WhatsApp) | www.sourcifychina.com/evtol-prolist
© 2026 SourcifyChina. All rights reserved. Data verified by SGS China (Certificate No. CN2026-SC-8841).
🧮 Landed Cost Calculator
Estimate your total import cost from China.
