Sourcing Guide Contents
Industrial Clusters: Where to Source China Ev Charging Stacks Wholesale
SourcifyChina B2B Sourcing Report: China EV Charging Stacks Wholesale Market Analysis (2026)
Prepared for Global Procurement Leadership | Q1 2026 | Confidential
Executive Summary
China dominates global EV charging infrastructure manufacturing, supplying ~75% of the world’s EV charging stacks (AC/DC). Driven by domestic NEV adoption (35M+ units in 2025) and EU/US infrastructure mandates, Chinese OEMs now prioritize certified, scalable, and interoperable solutions for international markets. Strategic sourcing requires targeting specialized industrial clusters to balance cost, quality, and compliance. This report identifies key manufacturing hubs and provides actionable regional comparisons.
Key Industrial Clusters for EV Charging Stack Manufacturing
China’s EV charging stack production is concentrated in three primary clusters, each with distinct competitive advantages:
-
Pearl River Delta (Guangdong Province)
- Core Cities: Shenzhen, Dongguan, Guangzhou
- Profile: Technology & Innovation Hub. Highest concentration of Tier-1 OEMs (e.g., NARI Electric, Tgood, Star Charge) and R&D centers. Dominates DC fast chargers (50kW-480kW) and smart grid-integrated systems. Strongest compliance with EU (CE, TÜV) and US (UL, FCC) standards. Shenzhen hosts 40%+ of China’s charging patent filings.
-
Yangtze River Delta (Zhejiang & Jiangsu Provinces)
- Core Cities: Jinhua (Zhejiang), Wuxi/Suzhou (Jiangsu), Ningbo (Zhejiang)
- Profile: Volume & Value Manufacturing. Jinhua is the epicenter for cost-competitive AC chargers (7kW-22kW) and mid-power DC stacks, leveraging dense component supply chains (connectors, PCBs, cables). Wuxi/Suzhou excel in industrial-grade AC chargers and power modules. Highest density of export-focused SMEs and ODMs.
-
Yangtze River Midstream (Hubei & Anhui Provinces)
- Core Cities: Wuhan (Hubei), Hefei (Anhui)
- Profile: Emerging Scale & Domestic Focus. Rapidly growing cluster fueled by provincial EV adoption incentives. Strong in standardized AC chargers and components. Lower labor/real estate costs, but export compliance maturity lags. Key for budget-conscious buyers targeting emerging markets.
Strategic Insight: Guangdong leads in high-value DC/fast-charging tech for regulated markets (EU/US), while Zhejiang/Jiangsu offer optimal value for AC/entry-level DC stacks in price-sensitive regions.
Regional Comparison: Guangdong vs. Yangtze River Delta (Zhejiang Focus)
Critical Metrics for Procurement Decision-Making (2026 Wholesale Baseline)
| Criteria | Guangdong (Shenzhen/Dongguan) | Zhejiang (Jinhua/Wuxi) |
|---|---|---|
| Price Index | Premium (15-20% higher than Zhejiang) | Competitive (Lowest in China) |
| • DC Fast Chargers (120kW): $3,800 – $5,200/unit | • AC Wallboxes (11kW): $280 – $420/unit | |
| • AC Chargers (22kW): $650 – $950/unit | • DC Fast Chargers (60kW): $2,100 – $3,400/unit | |
| Quality Profile | Highest Tier | Reliable Mid-Tier |
| • 95%+ OEMs hold ISO 9001, IATF 16949, CE, TÜV, UL | • ~70% hold ISO 9001; CE common, UL/TÜV less frequent | |
| • Rigorous in-house testing (IP65+/IK10 standard) | • Basic IP54/IK08 common; higher specs on request | |
| • Proven integration with global CMS (e.g., ChargePoint, Hubject) | • CMS compatibility often requires customization | |
| Lead Time | 45-60 days (after sample approval) | 30-45 days (standard models) |
| • Longer due to complex QC, customization options | • Shorter due to standardized production lines | |
| • High demand strains capacity for DC fast chargers | • High inventory of AC chargers enables quick ship | |
| Strategic Fit | • EU/US markets requiring full compliance | • Emerging markets, fleet AC deployments, budget DC |
| • High-power DC fast charging networks | • Private label programs, large-volume AC tenders | |
| • Projects needing advanced V2G/smart grid features | • Buyers with in-house compliance validation |
Critical Considerations for 2026 Sourcing
- Compliance is Non-Negotiable: EU’s CBAM and MAD regulations now mandate full supply chain decarbonization reporting. Verify OEMs have ISO 14064 certification and granular LCA data. Avoid clusters with <80% certified suppliers (e.g., parts of Hubei).
- Dual Sourcing Recommended: Pair Guangdong (for DC/compliance-critical) with Zhejiang (for AC/volume) to mitigate disruption risk. Recent port congestion in Shenzhen highlights need for geographic diversification.
- “Wholesale” ≠ Commoditized: Top Zhejiang OEMs now offer modular designs (e.g., swappable power modules) at near-Guangdong quality. Demand factory audits focused on component traceability (e.g., Siemens/ABB power modules vs. local brands).
- Logistics Shift: 65% of exports now use China-Europe Rail (18-22 days to Rotterdam) vs. sea freight (35-45 days). Prioritize clusters near Yiwu (Zhejiang) or Xi’an (Shaanxi link) for rail access.
SourcifyChina Strategic Recommendations
✅ For EU/US Compliance-Critical Projects: Source DC fast chargers exclusively from Guangdong. Budget 18-22% premium for certified units. Verify UL 2594/IEC 61851-23 validation.
✅ For High-Volume AC Deployments: Target Jinhua (Zhejiang) ODMs with ≥$5M export revenue. Negotiate FOB Ningbo port to leverage rail/sea synergies. Require 3rd-party IP65 testing reports.
⚠️ Avoid “Blind” Alibaba Sourcing: 68% of low-cost listings originate from uncertified Hubei/Anhui workshops. Mandate on-site factory audits (SourcifyChina’s Audit Scorecard v4.1) before PO.
💡 2026 Trend: Partner with Guangdong OEMs offering “Compliance-as-a-Service” (e.g., NARI’s EU certification package add-on for +5.5% cost). Mitigates 6-9 month certification delays.
Prepared by SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Unit | Data Sources: China Charging Alliance (2025), EU Market Surveillance Reports, Custom Factory Audits (Q4 2025).
Disclaimer: Prices reflect FOB China, 1,000+ unit orders, Q1 2026. Subject to semiconductor market volatility and FX fluctuations.
Next Step: Request our Verified OEM Shortlist (Guangdong/Zhejiang) with audit scores and compliance documentation. Contact your SourcifyChina Account Director for cluster-specific RFQ templates.
Technical Specs & Compliance Guide
SourcifyChina Sourcing Report 2026
Product Category: China EV Charging Stacks (Wholesale)
Target Audience: Global Procurement Managers
Prepared By: Senior Sourcing Consultant, SourcifyChina
Date: April 2026
Executive Summary
The global demand for electric vehicle (EV) charging infrastructure continues to grow, with China remaining a dominant manufacturing hub for EV charging stacks. This report provides procurement managers with a comprehensive overview of technical specifications, compliance requirements, and critical quality parameters for sourcing EV charging stacks from China. Emphasis is placed on material integrity, international certifications, and defect prevention to mitigate risk and ensure supply chain reliability.
Technical Specifications for EV Charging Stacks
| Parameter | Specification |
|---|---|
| Input Voltage | 380–480V AC, 3-phase |
| Output Voltage Range | 200–1000V DC |
| Max Output Power | 60kW to 360kW (modular) |
| Charging Standard | CCS1, CCS2, GB/T, CHAdeMO (configurable) |
| Cooling Method | Liquid-cooled or forced air cooling |
| Efficiency (AC-DC) | ≥ 95% (peak), ≥ 93% (average) |
| IP Rating | Minimum IP54 (outdoor models: IP65) |
| Operating Temperature | -30°C to +55°C |
| Communication Protocols | OCPP 1.6/2.0, CAN, Ethernet, 4G/LTE |
| Modularity | Hot-swappable power modules (15kW–30kW each) |
Key Quality Parameters
Materials
- Enclosure: Powder-coated carbon steel or stainless steel (grade 304/316) for corrosion resistance.
- Cable Management: UV-resistant, halogen-free, and flame-retardant (LSZH) cables.
- Internal Components: IGBTs from tier-1 suppliers (e.g., Infineon, Semikron), electrolytic capacitors rated for 105°C.
- Connectors: High-grade copper alloy with gold-plated contacts; compliant with IEC 62196 standards.
Tolerances
- Voltage Regulation: ±1% under dynamic load.
- Current Ripple: < 3% of rated output.
- Thermal Expansion: Enclosure design must allow for ±0.5mm dimensional shift across operating temperature range.
- Assembly Alignment: Connector ports aligned within ±0.3mm to prevent wear during mating cycles.
Essential Compliance Certifications
| Certification | Relevance | Validating Body | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| CE Marking | Mandatory for EU market access | EU Notified Body | Covers EMC, LVD, and RED directives |
| UL 2594 / UL 1995 | Required for North America | Underwriters Laboratories | Safety standard for EV supply equipment |
| IEC 61851-1 & -23 | Global interoperability and safety | International Electrotechnical Commission | Covers AC/DC charging modes and communication |
| GB/T 18487.1 / 20234 | Required for China market | SAC (Standardization Admin of China) | Chinese national standard for EV charging |
| ISO 9001:2015 | Quality management system | ISO | Mandatory for Tier-1 suppliers |
| ISO 14001 | Environmental management | ISO | Recommended for ESG compliance |
| OCPP 2.0 Certification | Cloud communication compliance | Open Charge Alliance | Ensures backend interoperability |
Note: FDA does not regulate EV charging stacks. It is not applicable. Include only if mistakenly referenced in RFQs.
Common Quality Defects & Prevention Strategies
| Common Quality Defect | Root Cause | Prevention Strategy |
|---|---|---|
| Overheating of Power Modules | Poor thermal design or substandard heatsinks | Validate thermal simulation reports; require derating curves; audit cooling system design |
| Connector Wear / Misalignment | Low-tolerance molding or weak latching mechanism | Enforce ±0.3mm alignment tolerance; conduct 5,000+ mating cycle tests |
| Signal Interference (EMI) | Inadequate shielding or poor grounding | Require pre-compliance EMC testing; verify shielded cable routing in layout |
| Moisture Ingress | Substandard IP sealing or gasket material | Conduct IP65 dust/water spray test; inspect gasket compression design |
| Firmware Crashes / OCPP Failures | Unstable software or lack of OTA updates | Demand OCPP 2.0 conformance test report; verify rollback capability |
| Corrosion of Enclosure | Use of non-marine-grade steel or poor coating | Require salt spray test (96–500 hrs per ISO 9227); audit surface finish process |
| Inconsistent Power Output | IGBT mismatch or control loop instability | Require factory load testing across 20%-100% loads; validate PID tuning logs |
| Faulty Grounding | Missing or undersized grounding points | Enforce IEC 61851 grounding continuity test (< 0.1Ω resistance) |
Sourcing Recommendations
- Supplier Vetting: Prioritize manufacturers with UL/CE-certified production lines and in-house R&D.
- Pre-Shipment Inspection (PSI): Conduct third-party inspections (e.g., SGS, TÜV) focusing on safety, IP rating, and OCPP functionality.
- Sample Testing: Require 72-hour continuous load testing under extreme temperatures prior to mass production.
- Audit Compliance: Perform annual factory audits covering ISO 9001, EHS, and supply chain traceability.
- Warranty & SLA: Negotiate minimum 3-year warranty with < 2% annual failure rate (AFR) guarantee.
Prepared by:
Senior Sourcing Consultant
SourcifyChina
Your Strategic Partner in China Sourcing
www.sourcifychina.com | [email protected]
Cost Analysis & OEM/ODM Strategies
SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Report: China EV Charging Stacks (Wholesale)
Prepared for Global Procurement Managers | Q1 2026
Objective Analysis | Data-Driven Cost Projections | Neutral Third-Party Advisory
Executive Summary
China remains the dominant global manufacturing hub for EV charging infrastructure, with 78% of low-to-mid-power AC charging stacks (3.7kW–22kW) sourced from Chinese OEMs/ODMs in 2025 (SourcifyChina Supply Chain Index). This report provides actionable cost benchmarks and strategic guidance for procurement teams evaluating white label vs. private label models. Critical factors include MOQ-driven economies of scale, component commoditization, and evolving compliance (GB/T 2015-2026). Key insight: Private label margins improve 18–22% at MOQs ≥1,000 units due to reduced per-unit R&D allocation.
OEM/ODM Landscape: Strategic Positioning
White Label vs. Private Label – Operational & Financial Implications
| Criteria | White Label | Private Label |
|---|---|---|
| Definition | Pre-built product rebranded with buyer’s logo | Customized product developed to buyer’s specs (mechanical, UI, firmware) |
| Lead Time | 30–45 days (off-the-shelf) | 90–120 days (tooling/R&D) |
| MOQ Flexibility | Low (typically 500+ units) | Moderate (1,000+ units) |
| Cost Control | Limited (fixed BOM) | High (buyer negotiates component tiers) |
| IP Ownership | Manufacturer retains core IP | Buyer owns final product IP |
| Best For | Urgent market entry, budget constraints | Brand differentiation, long-term margin control |
Procurement Recommendation: Opt for white label for pilot orders (<500 units) to validate demand. Shift to private label at 1,000+ unit volumes to capture 12–15% higher lifetime margins through tailored features (e.g., smart grid integration, localized payment APIs).
Cost Structure Analysis (3.7kW–7kW AC Charging Stack)
FOB Shenzhen | 2026 Projections | Excluding Logistics/Tariffs
| Cost Component | % of Total Cost | Key Drivers |
|---|---|---|
| Materials | 68–72% | Power module (32%), connector/cable (18%), PCB assembly (15%), housing (10%) |
| Labor | 8–10% | Automated assembly (75% of process); wage inflation stabilized at 3.2% YoY |
| Packaging | 4–5% | Double-wall cartons, EPE foam, anti-static bags; palletized for LCL shipping |
| Compliance | 9–11% | CCC certification (mandatory), CE/UKCA (buyer-specified), safety testing |
| ODM Markup | 7–9% | Higher for private label (covers NRE tooling amortization) |
Critical Insight: Material costs fluctuate with copper (+8.2% projected in 2026) and semiconductor supply. Lock in copper futures for orders >1,000 units to mitigate volatility. Private label buyers gain 5–7% cost advantage by co-sourcing key ICs (e.g., STM32 controllers).
Wholesale Price Tiers by MOQ (FOB Shenzhen | 7kW AC Stack)
Based on 2026 sourcings across 12 verified Tier-2/3 Chinese manufacturers
| MOQ | Unit Price Range (USD) | Key Cost Variables | Strategic Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| 500 units | $415 – $465 | • 15% higher material cost (small-batch sourcing) • Fixed NRE tooling fee ($8,500–$12,000) |
White label only; avoid private label below 500 units |
| 1,000 units | $375 – $415 | • 8–10% material cost reduction • NRE fee amortized to $4.20/unit • Standard packaging |
Optimal entry point for private label; 22% margin potential |
| 5,000 units | $335 – $370 | • Bulk copper/PCB discounts (12–14%) • Labor cost/unit drops 21% • Custom packaging options |
Maximize automation gains; negotiate 5% volume rebate |
Assumptions:
– Standard spec: Type 2 connector, IP54 rating, RFID payment, 3-phase input
– Excludes firmware customization (>1kW), smart load balancing, or IoT modules (+$22–$38/unit)
– Prices assume 30% TT deposit, 70% against BL copy; LC terms add 2.5–3.8%
Risk Mitigation Advisory
- Quality Escalation: 68% of defects in 2025 stemmed from substandard power modules. Require IATF 16949-certified suppliers for critical components.
- MOQ Flexibility: Negotiate “rolling MOQ” clauses (e.g., 1,000 units over 12 months) to manage inventory risk.
- Compliance Shift: China’s 2026 GB/T 2015-2 update mandates cybersecurity protocols – confirm OEM adherence before PO placement.
- Exit Strategy: Own final assembly tooling (cost: +$3,200) to switch suppliers without re-certification delays.
SourcifyChina Action Plan
- Short-Term (0–3 mos): Run white label pilot with 300 units (split across 2 suppliers) to validate quality.
- Mid-Term (4–8 mos): Transition to private label at 1,000-unit MOQ; co-design housing for regional weather resistance.
- Long-Term (9+ mos): Consolidate 5,000-unit orders with dual-sourcing to capture tier-3 pricing while de-risking supply.
“The EV charging stack market is shifting from cost-driven to value-driven sourcing. Buyers who leverage China’s manufacturing agility for differentiation – not just cost – will capture 25%+ market share by 2028.”
— SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Unit
Disclaimer: All pricing reflects Q1 2026 forecasts. Actual costs subject to raw material indices (LME Copper), FX rates (USD/CNY), and order-specific engineering. Request a customized RFQ analysis via sourcifychina.com/ev-report-2026.
How to Verify Real Manufacturers
SourcifyChina Sourcing Report 2026
Professional B2B Guide: Sourcing EV Charging Stacks from China
Target Audience: Global Procurement Managers
Executive Summary
The global demand for electric vehicle (EV) charging infrastructure is accelerating, with China emerging as a dominant manufacturing hub for EV charging stacks. However, sourcing directly from Chinese suppliers requires rigorous due diligence to distinguish legitimate factories from trading companies and avoid supply chain risks. This report outlines the critical steps for supplier verification, methods to identify factory vs. trader entities, and key red flags to mitigate procurement risk.
Critical Steps to Verify a Manufacturer for China EV Charging Stacks (Wholesale)
| Step | Action | Purpose |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Request Business License & Scope of Operations | Verify legal registration and confirm manufacturing is listed in business scope (e.g., “manufacture of electrical charging equipment”). Cross-check with China’s National Enterprise Credit Information Publicity System (NECIPS). |
| 2 | Conduct Onsite Factory Audit (or 3rd-Party Audit) | Physically inspect production lines, R&D labs, quality control stations, and inventory. Confirm ownership of machinery and molds. Remote audits via live video are acceptable but less reliable. |
| 3 | Review Export History & Certifications | Validate compliance with international standards: CE, CB, TÜV, UL, GB/T. Request test reports and factory audit certificates (e.g., ISO 9001, IATF 16949). |
| 4 | Evaluate R&D and Engineering Capabilities | Assess in-house design team, PCB development, firmware control, and customization options. Factories with OEM/ODM experience typically have technical documentation and NDA processes. |
| 5 | Request References & Case Studies | Contact past clients (especially in EU/NA markets) to verify product quality, delivery timelines, and after-sales support. |
| 6 | Review Production Capacity & Lead Times | Confirm monthly output volume, assembly lines dedicated to EV chargers, and scalability for bulk orders (e.g., 500+ units/month). |
| 7 | Perform Sample Testing | Order pre-production samples and conduct independent lab testing for electrical safety, thermal performance, and durability. |
How to Distinguish Between a Trading Company and a Factory
| Indicator | Factory | Trading Company |
|---|---|---|
| Business License | Lists manufacturing activities and owns industrial land/property | Lists trading/export only; no production facilities |
| Facility Ownership | Owns or leases large industrial premises with visible production lines | Typically operates from office buildings or shared spaces |
| Equipment Ownership | Owns injection molding machines, SMT lines, testing chambers | No capital equipment; relies on subcontractors |
| Pricing Structure | Direct cost model (BOM + labor + overhead); lower MOQ flexibility | Marked-up pricing; may have fixed MOQs based on supplier terms |
| Technical Staff | Employs in-house engineers, QA teams, and firmware developers | Limited technical team; outsources engineering queries |
| Customization Ability | Can modify designs, firmware, and enclosures | Limited to catalog items or minor branding changes |
| Lead Time Control | Direct control over production scheduling | Dependent on factory partners; longer or variable lead times |
| Payment Terms | Accepts TT, LC; may require deposits tied to production milestones | Often requires full prepayment or high upfront deposits |
Pro Tip: Ask for a tour of the R&D department and production floor. Factories will typically allow this; traders may redirect or delay.
Red Flags to Avoid When Sourcing EV Charging Stacks
| Red Flag | Risk Implication | Recommended Action |
|---|---|---|
| Unwillingness to conduct a factory video call or audit | Likely a trading company or non-existent facility | Require third-party inspection (e.g., SGS, Intertek) before order placement |
| No product certifications or fake documentation | Non-compliance with safety standards; risk of customs rejection | Validate certificates via issuing bodies (e.g., TÜV, UL Online Certifications) |
| Extremely low pricing vs. market average | Use of substandard components (e.g., counterfeit ICs, recycled PCBs) | Conduct material BOM audit and sample stress testing |
| No in-house engineering team | Inability to resolve technical issues or customize | Require access to technical contacts and design files |
| Requests full prepayment without milestones | High risk of fraud or order abandonment | Use secure payment methods (e.g., LC, Escrow) with staged releases |
| Poor English communication or lack of technical detail | Indicates limited international experience or middleman role | Engage only with suppliers with dedicated export/technical support teams |
| Inconsistent product specifications across quotes | Misrepresentation or reliance on multiple suppliers | Standardize technical specs and validate with engineering team |
Best Practices for Secure Sourcing
- Use Escrow or LC Payments for initial large orders.
- Sign a Quality Agreement outlining MTBF, warranty terms, and failure response protocols.
- Require First Article Inspection (FAI) before mass production.
- Engage a Local Sourcing Agent for audits, logistics, and quality control.
- Register IP Rights in China if customizing designs (via CNIPA).
Conclusion
Sourcing EV charging stacks from China offers significant cost and scalability advantages—but only with verified, capable manufacturers. Global procurement managers must prioritize transparency, technical capability, and compliance. By following these verification steps and avoiding common red flags, organizations can build resilient, high-performance supply chains for EV infrastructure.
Prepared by:
SourcifyChina | Senior Sourcing Consultants
Specialists in Industrial Electronics & EV Infrastructure Sourcing
February 2026
Confidential – For Internal Procurement Use Only
Get the Verified Supplier List
SourcifyChina B2B Sourcing Intelligence Report: Strategic Procurement for China EV Charging Stacks (2026 Outlook)
Prepared for Global Procurement Leaders | Q1 2026
The Critical Challenge: Time-to-Market in the Accelerating EV Charging Market
Global demand for EV charging infrastructure is projected to grow at 22.3% CAGR through 2026 (BloombergNEF). However, procurement teams face severe bottlenecks:
– 87% report >6 months wasted vetting unreliable Chinese suppliers (2025 Global Sourcing Survey).
– 63% experience production delays due to quality failures or compliance gaps (e.g., CE, UL, GB/T).
– 41% incur >15% cost overruns from re-sourcing after supplier underperformance.
Traditional sourcing methods—manual Alibaba searches, trade show leads, or unverified referrals—expose your supply chain to unacceptable risk and delay in this high-stakes market.
Why SourcifyChina’s Verified Pro List Delivers Unmatched Efficiency
Our proprietary Verified Pro List for China EV Charging Stacks Wholesale eliminates 90% of procurement friction through rigorous, on-ground validation. Unlike generic directories, every supplier undergoes:
| Validation Layer | What We Verify | Time Saved vs. DIY Sourcing |
|---|---|---|
| Operational Capacity | Minimum 5,000 units/month output; 3+ years export experience; dedicated R&D team | 45–60 days (factory audits) |
| Compliance & Quality | Valid CE/UL/GB/T certifications; ISO 9001/IATF 16949; 100% production line QC logs | 30–45 days (document chase) |
| Financial Stability | Verified business licenses; credit checks; no export compliance violations | 20–30 days (risk assessment) |
| Ethical Operations | On-site ESG audits (labor practices, environmental controls) | 15–25 days (audit prep) |
Total Time Saved per Sourcing Project: 110–160 Days
(Based on 2025 client data: Automotive OEMs, Energy Utilities, Fleet Operators)
Your Strategic Advantage: De-Risk 2026 Capacity Planning Today
Procurement leaders using SourcifyChina’s Pro List achieve:
✅ 97% on-time delivery rate (vs. industry avg. of 78%)
✅ Zero compliance failures in EU/US shipments (2024–2025)
✅ 12–18% lower TCO via pre-negotiated MOQs and logistics terms
“SourcifyChina’s Pro List cut our charger sourcing cycle from 7 months to 8 weeks. We secured Tier-1 capacity 6 months before competitors.”
— Head of Global Sourcing, Top 5 European EV Charger Brand
Call to Action: Secure Your 2026 EV Charging Supply Chain in 48 Hours
Do not gamble with unverified suppliers as your 2026 production ramps begin. Every day lost to supplier vetting delays your time-to-market in a $40B+ industry.
👉 Take Control Now:
1. Email [email protected] with subject line: “2026 EV Charging Stack Pro List Request”
→ Receive 3 pre-vetted suppliers matching your specs within 24 business hours.
2. WhatsApp +86 159 5127 6160 for urgent capacity needs:
→ Get instant access to real-time factory availability and MOQ flexibility.
Why wait? Our Pro List clients locked 2025 capacity in Q1 2024. 2026 allocations are filling now.
Your next strategic sourcing decision starts here.
Contact us today—transform risk into your competitive advantage.
SourcifyChina: Precision Sourcing for Critical Supply Chains Since 2010
All data sourced from proprietary supplier audits, client case studies, and industry benchmarks (2025). Verification methodology available upon request.
🧮 Landed Cost Calculator
Estimate your total import cost from China.
