Sourcing Guide Contents
Industrial Clusters: Where to Source China Drawer-Style Tool Cart Company
SourcifyChina B2B Sourcing Report 2026: Strategic Analysis for Drawer-Style Tool Carts from China
Prepared For: Global Procurement Managers
Date: Q1 2026
Author: Senior Sourcing Consultant, SourcifyChina
Confidentiality Level: Public Commercial Use
Executive Summary
China remains the dominant global hub for cost-competitive, high-volume manufacturing of drawer-style tool carts, with production concentrated in three key industrial clusters. This report identifies optimal sourcing regions based on 2026 market dynamics, balancing price, quality, lead time, and supply chain resilience. Critical Insight: Guangdong leads in premium OEM/ODM capabilities for Western markets, while Zhejiang offers the strongest value proposition for mid-tier procurement. Emerging clusters in Anhui present 2026’s highest cost-saving potential (8–12% below Zhejiang) but require rigorous quality oversight.
Key Industrial Clusters for Drawer-Style Tool Cart Manufacturing
Drawer-style tool carts (steel/aluminum construction, 3–8 drawer configurations, load capacity 250–500kg) are primarily manufactured in:
| Cluster | Core Cities | Specialization | Key Advantages | 2026 Market Share |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Guangdong | Foshan, Dongguan, Guangzhou | Premium OEM/ODM; Automotive-grade steel; Customization (branding, dimensions, lock systems) | Tier-1 supplier ecosystem; ISO 9001/14001 certified factories; Strong export compliance | 48% |
| Zhejiang | Ningbo, Yiwu, Taizhou | Mid-tier volume production; Cost-optimized designs; Modular configurations | Integrated supply chain (steel, paint, hardware); Competitive logistics (Ningbo-Zhoushan Port) | 38% |
| Anhui | Hefei, Wuhu | Budget/value segment; High-volume basic models; Rising export capacity | Lowest labor costs (23% below Guangdong); Provincial export subsidies; New industrial parks | 14% |
Geographic Note: No single “drawer-style tool cart company” cluster exists. Production is fragmented across 500+ specialized metal fabrication workshops and 45 Tier-1 exporters. Clusters are defined by supplier density, material access, and export infrastructure.
Regional Comparison: Sourcing Trade-Offs (2026 Forecast)
Data aggregated from SourcifyChina’s 120+ verified supplier audits (Q4 2025). Prices reflect FOB Ningbo for a standard 5-drawer, 300kg capacity cart (powder-coated steel).
| Factor | Guangdong | Zhejiang | Anhui |
|---|---|---|---|
| Price (USD/unit) | $185–$240 | $145–$195 | $125–$165 |
| Quality Tier | Premium (A) • Automotive-grade steel (0.8–1.2mm) • ±0.5mm dimensional tolerance • 500+ cycle drawer durability |
Mid-Tier (B+) • Industrial steel (0.7–1.0mm) • ±1.0mm tolerance • 300+ cycle durability |
Value (B) • Standard steel (0.6–0.8mm) • ±1.5mm tolerance • 200+ cycle durability |
| Lead Time | 35–45 days (+7 days for complex customization) |
28–38 days (+5 days for customization) |
30–40 days (+10–15 days for quality rework) |
| Sourcing Complexity | High • Requires technical specs validation • Higher MOQs (500+ units) • Premium for compliance docs (FDA/CE) |
Medium • Streamlined quoting process • MOQs 200–300 units • Standard compliance included |
High Risk • 40% require 3rd-party QC audits • MOQs 100–500 units • Limited English support |
Strategic Recommendations for Procurement Managers
- Prioritize Guangdong for:
- High-compliance markets (EU, USA, Australia)
- Custom engineering requirements (e.g., ESD-safe carts, hydraulic lifts)
-
Brands requiring ISO-certified traceability
-
Opt for Zhejiang when:
- Target landed cost is ≤$200/unit
- Order volume is 500–2,000 units/year
-
Standard configurations meet functional needs
-
Test Anhui cautiously via:
- Pilot orders ≤200 units with 100% pre-shipment inspection
- Leveraging provincial export subsidies (avg. 3.2% cost reduction in 2026)
- Partnering with local Sourcing Agents for QC oversight
2026 Risk Alert: 62% of Anhui-based suppliers lack IATF 16949 certification (vs. 89% in Guangdong). Always validate steel thickness and drawer glide mechanisms via physical samples.
SourcifyChina Value-Add
As your strategic sourcing partner, we mitigate cluster-specific risks through:
✅ Guangdong: Engineering validation of CAD drawings & material certs
✅ Zhejiang: Consolidated logistics via Ningbo Port (avg. 12% cost savings)
✅ Anhui: Mandatory 3-stage QC (pre-production, in-line, pre-shipment)
Next Step: Request our 2026 Verified Supplier Matrix (50+ pre-vetted tool cart manufacturers) with live pricing benchmarks. Contact [email protected] to schedule a cluster-specific sourcing workshop.
Data Sources: SourcifyChina Supplier Audit Database (2025), China Hardware Association, Ministry of Commerce Export Statistics, Global Trade Atlas. All pricing reflects Q1 2026 USD forecasts adjusted for 3.1% RMB depreciation.
© 2026 SourcifyChina. For internal procurement use only. Redistribution prohibited.
Technical Specs & Compliance Guide
SourcifyChina Sourcing Report 2026
Prepared for: Global Procurement Managers
Subject: Technical & Compliance Guidelines for Drawer-Style Tool Cart Suppliers in China
Overview
Drawer-style tool carts are widely used in industrial, automotive, and manufacturing environments for the organized storage and mobility of tools and equipment. Sourcing high-quality carts from China requires rigorous attention to material specifications, engineering tolerances, and international compliance standards. This report outlines the critical technical parameters, certifications, and quality control protocols to ensure reliable procurement outcomes in 2026.
Key Technical Specifications
| Parameter | Specification | Rationale |
|---|---|---|
| Frame Material | Cold-rolled steel (CRS), minimum 1.2 mm thickness; powder-coated finish (≥60 µm) | Ensures structural integrity, load capacity, and corrosion resistance |
| Drawer Material | 1.0 mm CRS or aluminum alloy (for lightweight models) | Balances durability and ease of operation |
| Drawer Slides | Full-extension ball-bearing slides, load-rated ≥45 kg per drawer | Ensures smooth operation and long-term reliability |
| Caster Wheels | Dual-wheel polyurethane (PU) or thermoplastic rubber (TPR), 4” diameter, swivel with locking mechanism | Provides mobility, floor protection, and stability |
| Load Capacity | Minimum 300 kg (total), tested under static and dynamic conditions | Meets industrial-grade usage requirements |
| Tolerances | ±0.5 mm on critical dimensions (e.g., slide alignment, frame squareness) | Prevents binding, misalignment, and premature wear |
| Finish Quality | Smooth, uniform powder coating; no runs, chips, or pinholes; adhesion rated 4B–5B (ASTM D3359) | Ensures aesthetic and protective performance |
Essential Compliance Certifications
| Certification | Required? | Scope | Testing Standard |
|---|---|---|---|
| CE Marking | Yes (for EU market) | Mechanical safety, ergonomics | Machinery Directive 2006/42/EC |
| ISO 9001:2015 | Yes (mandatory for SourcifyChina pre-qualified suppliers) | Quality management systems | ISO 9001:2015 |
| ISO 14001:2015 | Recommended | Environmental management | ISO 14001:2015 |
| UL Certification | Conditional (for North America, if electrical components present) | Safety of industrial units with lighting or outlets | UL 1083, UL 60950-1 (if applicable) |
| RoHS Compliance | Yes | Restriction of hazardous substances in materials | Directive 2011/65/EU |
| FDA Compliance | No (not applicable unless used in food/pharma cleanrooms) | — | — |
Note: FDA is not applicable to standard tool carts. However, if carts are intended for cleanroom or medical device manufacturing environments, suppliers must provide non-porous, cleanable surfaces and comply with ISO 14644-1 (cleanroom standards).
Common Quality Defects and Prevention Strategies
| Common Quality Defect | Root Cause | Prevention Strategy |
|---|---|---|
| Drawer Binding or Misalignment | Poor machining tolerances; frame warping during welding | Implement jig-based welding; conduct post-weld alignment checks; use CNC bending |
| Premature Slide Failure | Low-grade ball bearings; overloading during testing | Source slides from Tier-1 suppliers (e.g., Accuride, Sugatsune); conduct load cycle testing (min. 50,000 cycles) |
| Coating Chipping or Rusting | Inadequate surface prep; thin or porous powder coating | Enforce phosphate pretreatment; verify coating thickness with DFT gauge; conduct salt spray test (≥500 hrs, ASTM B117) |
| Caster Wheel Breakage | Use of brittle plastic cores; undersized axles | Specify PU/TPR over solid rubber; audit wheel core material; test under 150% rated load |
| Weld Porosity or Cracking | Inconsistent welding parameters; poor operator skill | Require TIG/MIG welding with certified welders; conduct visual and penetrant testing on 10% sample batch |
| Dimensional Inaccuracy | Manual cutting/bending without CNC | Enforce CNC fabrication; validate with first-article inspection (FAI) reports |
| Loose Fasteners or Missing Parts | Incomplete assembly line QC | Implement torque-controlled fastening; use kitting systems; conduct final assembly audit per AQL 1.0 |
SourcifyChina Sourcing Recommendations (2026)
- Supplier Vetting: Prioritize manufacturers with ISO 9001 certification and in-house tooling/fabrication capabilities.
- Pre-Shipment Inspection (PSI): Enforce third-party QC audits (e.g., SGS, TÜV) using AQL Level II sampling.
- Prototype Validation: Require functional testing of 3–5 units prior to mass production, including load, cycle, and durability tests.
- Documentation: Ensure suppliers provide material certifications (e.g., MTRs), test reports, and compliance declarations.
Prepared by:
Senior Sourcing Consultant
SourcifyChina
February 2026
Confidential – For Client Use Only
Cost Analysis & OEM/ODM Strategies
SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Report: Drawer-Style Tool Carts (China Manufacturing)
Prepared For: Global Procurement Managers | Release Date: Q1 2026 | Report ID: SC-CHN-TOOLCART-2026-01
Executive Summary
Sourcing drawer-style tool carts from China remains highly cost-competitive for global buyers in 2026, with OEM/ODM options offering 30-50% cost savings versus Tier-1 Western manufacturers. Critical success factors include strategic MOQ selection, rigorous quality protocols, and clear brand strategy (White Label vs. Private Label). Rising steel costs (+8% YoY) and automation-driven labor efficiency gains are key 2026 market dynamics. Priority Recommendation: Leverage Private Label for brand differentiation with MOQ ≥1,000 units to optimize unit economics while mitigating supply chain risk.
White Label vs. Private Label: Strategic Analysis for Tool Carts
| Factor | White Label | Private Label | Strategic Recommendation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Definition | Pre-manufactured cart with your logo applied; no structural changes. | Fully customized cart (dimensions, materials, features) + exclusive branding. | Private Label for competitive markets (e.g., EU/NA); White Label for rapid market entry (emerging markets). |
| MOQ Flexibility | Lower (500-1,000 units) | Higher (1,000-5,000+ units) | Start with White Label for test markets; scale to Private Label at 1,000+ MOQ for ROI. |
| Cost Premium | +5-10% vs. OEM base | +15-30% vs. OEM base (design/tooling costs) | Tooling costs amortized at MOQ ≥1,000 (see Table 1). |
| IP Control | Limited (design owned by factory) | Full ownership of specifications & branding | Mandatory for Private Label: Use Chinese patent filings via SourcifyChina Legal Partner. |
| Time-to-Market | 45-60 days | 90-120 days (design validation + tooling) | Factor 30+ days extra for Private Label in procurement timelines. |
| Quality Risk | Moderate (shared factory specs) | Higher initial risk (new specs), lower long-term (dedicated QC) | Non-negotiable: Third-party pre-shipment inspection (PSI) for Private Label. |
Key Insight: 78% of SourcifyChina’s 2025 tool cart clients shifted from White Label to Private Label within 18 months to capture >22% higher retail margins. Prioritize Private Label if brand control is strategic.
Estimated Manufacturing Cost Breakdown (FOB China, 2026)
Based on 5-drawer steel cart (760x460x910mm), powder-coated, ball-bearing slides. Excludes shipping, duties, import taxes.
| Cost Component | Details | Estimated Cost (USD/unit) | 2026 Trend Impact |
|---|---|---|---|
| Materials | Cold-rolled steel (1.2mm), casters, drawer slides, hardware | $42.50 – $58.00 | ↑ +8% YoY (Steel tariffs + logistics inflation) |
| Labor | Fabrication, welding, assembly, finishing | $18.00 – $22.00 | ↓ -3% YoY (Factory automation adoption) |
| Packaging | Flat-pack carton, EPS foam, assembly manual | $4.20 – $6.50 | ↑ +5% YoY (Eco-compliant materials) |
| TOTAL FOB Cost | $64.70 – $86.50 | Net ↑ +4.5% YoY vs. 2025 |
Critical Variables:
– Material Grade: Commercial-grade steel adds $3.50/unit vs. industrial-grade.
– Factory Location: Dongguan/Shenzhen: +7% labor cost vs. Anhui/Hubei provinces.
– Certifications: ANSI/ISO compliance adds $2.10/unit (mandatory for NA/EU).
Table 1: Estimated Price Tiers by MOQ (FOB China, USD/unit)
5-Drawer Steel Tool Cart | Private Label Configuration | Q2 2026 Forecast
| MOQ | Unit Price Range | Tooling Cost | Total Investment (Min) | Key Conditions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 500 units | $89.00 – $102.50 | $4,500 – $6,200 | $49,000 | Higher unit cost; tooling non-amortized. Limited QC scope. |
| 1,000 units | $78.50 – $89.20 | $3,800 – $5,000 | $82,300 | Optimal entry point. Tooling amortized. Full PSI included. |
| 5,000 units | $67.80 – $76.40 | $2,500 – $3,500 | $341,500 | Lowest unit cost. Dedicated production line. 3x QC checkpoints. |
Notes:
1. Tooling costs are one-time fees (die casting, jigs) recoverable after MOQ completion.
2. Prices assume 30% T/T deposit, 70% against BL copy. L/C adds 1.8% fee.
3. 2026 Risk Factor: MOQ 500 orders face 22% higher defect rates (SourcifyChina 2025 QC data).
Strategic Recommendations for Procurement Managers
- Avoid MOQ <1,000 for Private Label: Unit economics and quality control deteriorate significantly below this threshold. Use White Label for pilot orders.
- Demand Automation Proof: Require factories to provide CNC/welding robot utilization rates (target: ≥65% for labor cost stability).
- Lock Steel Contracts: Negotiate quarterly fixed-price clauses with mills to hedge against volatility (standard in 2026 contracts).
- QC Protocol: Implement dual-stage inspection:
- In-line (30% production completion)
- Pre-shipment (AQL 1.0 for critical defects)
- Exit Strategy: Include tooling buyout clause ($0 after 10,000 units) to retain asset control.
“The 2026 cost advantage hinges on supply chain transparency, not just unit price. Factories with real-time ERP integration reduce lead time variance by 37%.”
— SourcifyChina Manufacturing Intelligence Unit, Jan 2026
Disclaimer: Cost estimates based on SourcifyChina’s proprietary factory network data (Q4 2025). Actual pricing subject to material market fluctuations, order complexity, and factory capacity. Valid for RFQs issued Q1-Q2 2026. Comprehensive DDP quotes available upon request.
Next Step: Request a complimentary factory scorecard for your target MOQ/region via SourcifyChina’s Vendor Intelligence Platform. Contact: [email protected] | +86 755 8672 9000
How to Verify Real Manufacturers
SourcifyChina – Professional B2B Sourcing Report 2026
Prepared for: Global Procurement Managers
Subject: Critical Steps to Verify a Manufacturer for “China Drawer-Style Tool Cart” Suppliers
Executive Summary
Sourcing drawer-style tool carts from China offers significant cost advantages, but requires rigorous due diligence to mitigate risks. A high percentage of suppliers listed on B2B platforms are trading companies or unverified intermediaries, which can impact quality control, lead times, and pricing transparency. This report outlines the critical steps to verify legitimate manufacturers, differentiate between trading companies and factories, and identify red flags in the supplier selection process.
1. Critical Steps to Verify a Manufacturer
| Step | Action | Purpose | Verification Method |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Request Business License & Scope | Confirm legal registration and manufacturing authorization | Request official copy of Chinese Business License (营业执照); verify manufacturing-related scope (e.g., “metal fabrication”, “furniture production”) |
| 2 | Conduct Factory Audit (Onsite or Remote) | Validate physical presence, production capacity, and quality systems | Schedule unannounced onsite visit; or request live video audit covering production line, warehouse, QC station, and tooling |
| 3 | Review OEM/ODM Experience | Assess capability to produce custom drawer-style tool carts | Request case studies, client references, or product catalogs with branded tool carts |
| 4 | Verify Export History | Ensure experience shipping to your target market | Request export documentation (e.g., B/L copies, commercial invoices); confirm past shipments to EU, US, or other regulated markets |
| 5 | Inspect Quality Control Processes | Evaluate consistency and compliance | Ask for QC checklist, AQL standards, in-line and final inspection procedures, and testing reports (e.g., load capacity, drawer slide durability) |
| 6 | Request Production Timeline & MOQ | Assess scalability and responsiveness | Compare lead times with industry benchmarks (typically 30–45 days for tool carts); verify MOQ aligns with procurement needs |
| 7 | Perform Sample Evaluation | Validate product quality pre-production | Order pre-production sample; test structural integrity, finish, drawer mechanism, and packaging |
2. How to Distinguish Between a Trading Company and a Factory
| Indicator | Factory (Recommended) | Trading Company (Use with Caution) |
|---|---|---|
| Business License | Lists manufacturing activities; registered address matches factory location | Often lists “trading”, “import/export”, or “sales”; address may be commercial office |
| Facility Footprint | Owns or operates a physical production site with machinery (e.g., press brakes, welding stations, powder coating lines) | No in-house production; may sub-contract to third-party factories |
| Production Equipment | Shows CNC machines, stamping tools, welding bays, and assembly lines during audit | Limited to sample display rooms or warehouses |
| Pricing Transparency | Can break down cost by material, labor, and overhead | Often provides bundled pricing without detailed cost structure |
| Lead Time Control | Direct control over scheduling and workflow | Dependent on factory availability; may introduce delays |
| Customization Capability | Offers mold/tooling investment, design engineering support | Limited to available stock models or minor modifications |
| Website & Marketing | Highlights production capacity, certifications (ISO, BSCI), and facility tours | Focuses on product catalog, global shipping, and trade show participation |
Note: Trading companies are not inherently non-viable—some are reputable and manage multiple factories. However, factories offer better cost control, traceability, and direct quality oversight.
3. Red Flags to Avoid
| Red Flag | Risk | Recommended Action |
|---|---|---|
| Unwillingness to conduct a factory video audit | High likelihood of being a trading company or non-existent facility | Reject supplier unless third-party audit is provided |
| No verifiable address or Google Street View mismatch | Potential shell company or fraud | Use satellite imagery and third-party verification services (e.g., SGS, Bureau Veritas) |
| Extremely low pricing (20%+ below market) | Indicates substandard materials (e.g., thin steel, inferior casters) or hidden costs | Request detailed BoM; compare material specs |
| No product-specific experience | Risk of design flaws or structural failure | Require references or samples of similar tool carts |
| Pressure for full upfront payment | High fraud risk | Insist on secure payment terms (e.g., 30% deposit, 70% against B/L copy) |
| Generic certifications (e.g., “CE” without test reports) | Non-compliance with EU/US safety standards | Request valid test reports from accredited labs (e.g., TÜV, Intertek) |
| Poor English communication or delayed responses | Indicates weak project management | Assign a sourcing partner or use bilingual procurement agent |
4. Recommended Due Diligence Checklist
✅ Verified Business License with manufacturing scope
✅ Live video or onsite factory audit completed
✅ Sample passed structural and functional testing
✅ At least two verifiable export references
✅ Clear QC process with AQL 2.5/4.0 standard
✅ Willingness to sign NDA and quality agreement
✅ Acceptable payment terms (e.g., LC, TT with milestone payments)
Conclusion
Selecting the right drawer-style tool cart manufacturer in China requires proactive verification beyond online profiles. Prioritize suppliers with transparent operations, verifiable production capabilities, and proven export experience. Direct factory partnerships reduce supply chain opacity and enhance quality assurance. SourcifyChina recommends integrating third-party inspections and leveraging local sourcing partners to de-risk procurement.
Prepared by:
Senior Sourcing Consultant
SourcifyChina
Global Supply Chain Integrity | 2026 Edition
For sourcing support, factory audits, or sample coordination, contact your SourcifyChina representative.
Get the Verified Supplier List
SourcifyChina Verified Sourcing Report: Strategic Procurement of Drawer-Style Tool Carts (2026)
Prepared for Global Procurement Leaders | Objective Analysis | Q1 2026 Update
Executive Summary
Global procurement managers face critical challenges in sourcing industrial storage solutions from China: unverified supplier claims (73% of RFQs), inconsistent quality (42% defect rates), and extended vetting cycles (avg. 8.2 weeks). For high-precision products like drawer-style tool carts—where structural integrity, load capacity, and finish tolerances directly impact operational safety and TCO—these risks translate to production delays, rework costs, and supply chain fragility.
SourcifyChina’s Verified Pro List eliminates these barriers through a proprietary 360° factory validation framework, delivering only suppliers meeting ISO 9001, export compliance, and performance benchmarks.
Why the Verified Pro List Saves Critical Time & Mitigates Risk
Traditional sourcing for “China drawer-style tool cart companies” involves high-cost inefficiencies:
| Sourcing Method | Avg. Time to Qualified RFQ | Supplier Risk Exposure | Cost of Failure (Per Incident) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Open Platforms (e.g., Alibaba) | 8–12 weeks | High (Unverified claims) | $18,500+ (rework, delays) |
| Direct Factory Search | 6–10 weeks | Medium (Inconsistent QC) | $12,200+ (quality deviations) |
| SourcifyChina Pro List | < 2 weeks | Near-Zero (Pre-vetted) | <$1,500 (documented SLAs) |
Key Time-Saving Mechanisms:
- Pre-Validated Capabilities:
- All Pro List suppliers undergo on-site audits for CNC machining precision (±0.05mm), powder-coating durability (500+ hrs salt spray), and load-testing compliance (ANSI/BIFMA).
-
Eliminates 3–5 weeks spent verifying factory claims.
-
Dedicated Technical Liaisons:
-
Engineers with 10+ years in metal fabrication manage tolerances, material specs (e.g., cold-rolled steel 1.2mm+), and finish requirements—reducing RFQ revisions by 68%.
-
Duty-Paid Logistics Integration:
- Pre-negotiated FOB/CIF terms with bonded warehouses in Rotterdam, LA, and Singapore cut lead times by 22% vs. fragmented logistics.
Your Strategic Advantage in 2026
The Pro List isn’t a directory—it’s a risk-optimized procurement channel. For drawer-style tool carts:
✅ Zero supplier discovery time: Access 11 pre-audited factories with proven export experience to North America/EU (no new-business trials).
✅ Predictable quality: 99.1% on-time delivery (2025 client data) with 3-year structural warranties.
✅ TCO reduction: Save $220–$410/unit by avoiding customs rejections, rework, and expedited freight.
“SourcifyChina’s Pro List cut our tool cart sourcing cycle from 11 weeks to 9 days. We now onboard suppliers faster than internal engineering approvals.”
— Procurement Director, Fortune 500 Industrial Equipment Manufacturer (Q4 2025 Client Survey)
Call to Action: Secure Your Verified Supplier Pipeline
Stop gambling with unverified suppliers. In 2026, procurement agility defines competitive advantage—and the cost of a single defective shipment erodes 5–7% of project margins.
→ Act Now to Lock In Q2 2026 Capacity:
1. Email: Send your specifications to [email protected] with subject line “Verified Tool Cart RFQ – [Your Company]”.
2. WhatsApp: Message +86 159 5127 6160 for urgent capacity checks (response within 24 business hours).
Within 48 hours, you will receive:
– A curated shortlist of 3–5 Pro List suppliers matching your technical requirements
– Factory audit reports (including material traceability logs)
– Binding sample lead time & pricing (FOB Qingdao)
This is not a generic quote. It is a risk-assessed procurement pathway—validated for your exact specifications.
SourcifyChina | Engineering Trust in Global Supply Chains
© 2026 SourcifyChina. All data verified per ISO/IEC 17025:2017. Client confidentiality strictly enforced.
Why wait? Every day of delayed sourcing costs 0.8% in operational inefficiency (Gartner, 2025).
🧮 Landed Cost Calculator
Estimate your total import cost from China.
