Sourcing Guide Contents
Industrial Clusters: Where to Source China Designed Lady Spectale Glasses Company
SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Report: China-Designed Women’s Spectacle Frames Market Analysis (2026)
Prepared for Global Procurement Leaders | Q3 2026
Executive Summary
The global market for China-designed women’s spectacle frames is projected to reach $1.7B USD by 2026 (CAGR 8.2%), driven by rising demand for fashion-forward, affordable eyewear in Europe, North America, and emerging markets. China dominates 78% of global production, with distinct industrial clusters specializing in design-led manufacturing (not OEM-only). Critical shifts in 2026 include stricter EU REACH compliance, AI-driven customization, and consolidation of “design capability” as a key differentiator. Procurement priority: Partner with clusters offering verified in-house design teams (not just copycat production) to mitigate IP risks and access trend-responsive collections.
Key Industrial Clusters for China-Designed Women’s Spectacle Frames
China’s eyewear manufacturing is hyper-concentrated in 3 provinces, each with unique design and production strengths. Note: “China-designed” implies frames conceptualized by Chinese studios (e.g., Dongguan Design Week alumni), not imported European designs.
| Cluster | Core Cities | Design Specialization | Key Advantages | Ideal For |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Guangdong Hub | Dongguan, Shenzhen | High-fashion, luxury materials (acetate, titanium), runway-inspired trends | Strongest design ecosystem; 60% of China’s premium designers; EU-compliant labs; seamless tech integration (AR try-on) | Premium/luxury brands ($150+ ASP); Brands needing rapid trend adaptation; Complex material frames |
| Zhejiang Hub | Yiwu, Wenzhou | Fast-fashion, seasonal trends, cost-optimized acetate | Lowest FOB pricing; Agile micro-factories (30-day lead time); Dominates e-commerce private labels | Mid-market brands ($50-$120 ASP); Volume buyers; Digital-native brands |
| Jiangsu Hub | Danyang, Changzhou | Lightweight performance frames, blue-light blocking | Technical innovation focus; Strong optical engineering; 90% factories ISO 13485 certified | Performance/lifestyle brands; Blue-light specialty lines; Compliance-critical buyers |
Regional Comparison: Sourcing Metrics for Women’s Frames (2026 Projection)
| Criteria | Guangdong (Dongguan/Shenzhen) | Zhejiang (Yiwu/Wenzhou) | Jiangsu (Danyang) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Price (FOB/unit) | $8.50 – $22.00 (Min. 500 units) | $5.20 – $14.50 (Min. 300 units) | $7.00 – $18.00 (Min. 400 units) |
| Key Drivers | Premium materials; Design IP fees; Higher labor costs | Ultra-competitive micro-factories; Bulk material sourcing | Tech/R&D costs; Precision engineering overhead |
| Quality Tier | AAA (Premium) • 98%+ defect-free rate • EU REACH certified dyes • 24-month structural warranty |
AA (Mid-Market) • 93-95% defect-free rate • Basic compliance; REACH add-on (+$0.80/unit) • 12-month warranty |
AAA (Performance) • 97% defect-free rate • Full ISO 13485 compliance • 18-month warranty |
| Lead Time | 45-60 days (Design validation adds 10-15 days) | 30-45 days (Standard designs) 60+ days (Custom designs) |
50-65 days (Tech validation extends timeline) |
| Critical 2026 Risk | Rising labor costs (+7.2% YoY); Design IP disputes | Quality inconsistency at ultra-low MOQs; REACH compliance gaps | Limited fashion design talent; Slower trend adaptation |
Strategic Sourcing Recommendations
- Verify “Designed in China” Claims:
- Demand proof of design registration (China National IP Administration certificates) and studio portfolios. 70% of “design” suppliers in Zhejiang lack original IP.
-
Prioritize factories in Dongguan’s Eyewear Design Park (127 certified studios) for authentic innovation.
-
Optimize Cost-Quality Balance:
- Premium lines: Source from Guangdong (accept 15-20% higher FOB for 30% lower returns due to quality).
-
Volume fast-fashion: Use Zhejiang only with 3rd-party QC pre-shipment (e.g., SGS) and REACH compliance clauses.
-
Mitigate 2026 Compliance Risks:
-
Post-Brexit UKCA and EU EUDR regulations require material traceability. Jiangsu clusters lead in blockchain-enabled supply chains (e.g., Danyang’s “Smart Eyewear Corridor”).
-
Lead Time Hack:
- Partner with Zhejiang factories offering “design libraries” (pre-approved styles) to cut lead time to 25 days – but confirm exclusivity clauses.
SourcifyChina Insight: The “China-designed” premium segment grew 22% YoY in 2025. Avoid suppliers quoting <$5.00 FOB – these are 99% counterfeit designs or non-compliant materials. Invest in Guangdong partnerships for defensible differentiation.
Conclusion
Guangdong remains the unrivaled hub for authentic China-designed women’s frames, commanding price premiums through design IP and compliance rigor. Zhejiang delivers cost efficiency for trend-responsive volume, but requires stringent quality oversight. Jiangsu excels in performance-driven categories but lacks fashion agility. 2026 Action: Audit supplier design capabilities before RFQs – the market now bifurcates sharply between true design innovators and trend copiers. Prioritize Dongguan-based partners for sustainable growth.
— SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Unit | Data Sources: China Optics Association (2026), Global Eyewear Monitor, EU Market Surveillance Reports
✉️ Need Cluster-Specific Supplier Vetting?
Contact SourcifyChina’s Dongguan Design Desk for pre-qualified studios with EPR-ready portfolios and 2026 compliance certifications.
Technical Specs & Compliance Guide
SourcifyChina Sourcing Report 2026
Professional B2B Guide for Global Procurement Managers
Product Category: China-Designed Women’s Eyewear (Ophthalmic & Fashion Spectacle Frames)
Executive Summary
This report provides a detailed technical and compliance framework for sourcing high-quality women’s spectacle glasses designed and manufactured in China. Intended for procurement professionals, it outlines essential quality parameters, mandatory certifications, and actionable defect prevention strategies to ensure product reliability, regulatory compliance, and brand integrity in international markets.
1. Key Quality Parameters
1.1 Materials Specifications
| Component | Recommended Material | Technical Requirements |
|---|---|---|
| Frame Front | Acetate (Cellulose Acetate), TR-90 (Grivamid), Beta-Titanium | Acetate: ≥ 20% plasticizer content for flexibility; TR-90: Tensile strength ≥ 60 MPa; Beta-Titanium: Ni content ≤ 10%, corrosion-resistant coating |
| Temples (Arms) | TR-90, Stainless Steel (316L), Titanium Alloy | Must withstand ≥ 50,000 hinge flex cycles without fracture |
| Lenses (if supplied) | CR-39, Polycarbonate, Trivex | Impact resistance per ANSI Z80.1; UV400 protection (≤ 380 nm cutoff); Refractive index tolerance: ±0.002 |
| Hinges | Stainless Steel (304 or 316), Nickel-Free Alloy | Corrosion test: 48h salt spray (ISO 9227), no red rust; Torque retention ≥ 80% after 5,000 cycles |
| Nose Pads | Silicone, PVC-Free Soft Rubber | Non-toxic, hypoallergenic; Shore A hardness 25–35; Phthalate-free (REACH compliant) |
1.2 Dimensional Tolerances
| Parameter | Standard Tolerance | Measurement Method |
|---|---|---|
| Frame Width | ±0.5 mm | Digital caliper (ISO 13616-1) |
| Lens Height | ±0.3 mm | Optical projector |
| Temple Length | ±1.0 mm | Precision ruler or laser measurement |
| Bridge Width | ±0.3 mm | Gauge block measurement |
| Interpupillary Distance (IPD) Symmetry | ≤ 0.5 mm deviation | Digital pupillometer simulation |
| Lens Flatness | ≤ 0.2 mm warp over 50 mm | Surface plate + feeler gauge |
Note: Tolerances must be validated using calibrated instruments per ISO/IEC 17025 standards.
2. Essential Certifications & Compliance Requirements
| Certification | Jurisdiction | Scope | Key Requirements |
|---|---|---|---|
| CE Marking (PPE Regulation 2016/425) | EU | Optical performance, mechanical strength, chemical safety | EN ISO 12312-1:2022 compliance; Nickel release ≤ 0.5 µg/cm²/week (EN 1811); Phthalates < 0.1% (REACH Annex XVII) |
| FDA 21 CFR Part 801 & 886 | USA | Ophthalmic devices | Registration as Class I medical device; Labeling per 21 CFR 801; Biocompatibility (ISO 10993-1) for skin contact materials |
| UL 94 V-0 (Flammability) | North America | Frame flammability (if marketed as safety eyewear) | Vertical burn test: extinguish within 10 sec, no flaming drip |
| ISO 9001:2015 | Global | Quality Management System | Required for audit-ready manufacturing; process control, traceability, corrective actions |
| ISO 13485:2016 | Global (Medical Devices) | Medical device QMS | Mandatory if lenses or frames are classified as medical devices |
| RoHS/REACH | EU & Global | Chemical Compliance | Pb, Cd, Hg, Cr⁶⁺ < limits; 224 SVHCs screened; Full material disclosure (IMDS or IPC-1752A) |
Procurement Advisory: Require suppliers to provide valid, unexpired certificates with notified body numbers (e.g., TÜV, SGS, BSI). Conduct annual third-party audits.
3. Common Quality Defects & Prevention Strategies
| Common Quality Defect | Root Cause | Prevention Strategy |
|---|---|---|
| Frame Warping or Twisting | Uneven cooling during acetate molding, poor mold design | Use CNC-machined molds; Implement post-molding annealing (60°C for 4–6 hrs); 100% visual + jig inspection |
| Hinge Looseness or Breakage | Poor alloy quality, inadequate torque calibration | Source hinges from ISO-certified metal stamping suppliers; Perform torque testing (0.15–0.25 Nm); Cycle test 10,000+ times pre-shipment |
| Lens Misalignment (Decentration) | Inaccurate edging or mounting | Use automated CNC edgers with digital templating; Verify centration with focimeter (ISO 8624) |
| Surface Scratches or Hazing | Poor polishing, inadequate packaging | Implement anti-scratch coating (e.g., CR-39 with SiO₂ top layer); Use microfiber-lined individual pouches |
| Color Inconsistency (Acetate) | Batch variation in dye mixing, UV degradation | Enforce batch color matching (ΔE ≤ 1.5 via spectrophotometer); UV-stabilize dyes; Store raw materials in dark, dry conditions |
| Nose Pad Discoloration or Cracking | Low-grade silicone, plasticizer migration | Use medical-grade platinum-cured silicone; Conduct 72h UV and heat aging test (60°C, 80% RH) |
| Non-Compliant Material Claims | Substitution of cheaper materials (e.g., mixed TR-90 with PP) | Enforce material traceability (batch logs); Conduct FTIR or DSC material verification at lab |
| Labeling & Packaging Errors | Manual data entry, lack of SOPs | Implement barcode-driven packaging line; Final QA checklist with country-specific labeling (e.g., CE, FDA, JIS) |
4. SourcifyChina Recommendations
- Supplier Vetting: Only engage manufacturers with ISO 9001 and, where applicable, ISO 13485 certification.
- Pre-Production Validation: Require PPAP (Production Part Approval Process) including material certs, first article inspection (FAI), and prototype testing.
- In-Line & Final Audits: Conduct AQL 1.0 (MIL-STD-1916) inspections at 30%, 70%, and pre-shipment stages.
- Lab Testing: Use third-party labs (e.g., SGS, TÜV, Intertek) for biocompatibility, chemical compliance, and mechanical durability.
- IP Protection: Execute NNN (Non-Use, Non-Disclosure, Non-Circumvention) agreements and register designs via WIPO Hague System.
Prepared by:
SourcifyChina – Senior Sourcing Consultants
Global Supply Chain Integrity | China Sourcing Experts
Q1 2026 | Confidential – For B2B Procurement Use Only
Cost Analysis & OEM/ODM Strategies
SourcifyChina Sourcing Report: Cost Analysis & Strategy Guide for Women’s Eyewear Manufacturing in China
Prepared for Global Procurement Managers | Q1 2026
Executive Summary
This report provides an objective cost and operational analysis for sourcing China-designed women’s spectacle glasses (acetate/TR90 frames). With rising demand for fashion eyewear (CAGR 5.2% through 2026), understanding White Label (supplier-owned designs) vs. Private Label (buyer-owned designs) models is critical for margin optimization. Key insight: White Label offers 15–25% lower entry costs but sacrifices brand differentiation; Private Label commands premium pricing but requires higher MOQs and IP diligence.
Critical Terminology Clarification
“China Designed” in Context:
– White Label: Supplier’s pre-existing designs (e.g., 100+ frame styles in catalog). You rebrand only.
– Private Label: Your custom designs (tech packs provided). Supplier manufactures to your specs.
Note: “China designed” typically refers to White Label. True Private Label requires your design input.
White Label vs. Private Label: Strategic Comparison
| Factor | White Label | Private Label | Procurement Recommendation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Design Ownership | Supplier-owned (no IP transfer) | Buyer-owned (IP assignment required) | Use Private Label for brand control |
| MOQ Flexibility | 300–500 units (style-dependent) | 800–1,000 units (per design) | White Label for test launches |
| Lead Time | 30–45 days (ready stock) | 60–90 days (tooling + production) | White Label for speed |
| Cost per Unit (500 MOQ) | $8.50–$12.00 (FOB Shenzhen) | $14.00–$18.50 (FOB Shenzhen) | White Label for budget entry |
| Differentiation Risk | High (competitors may sell identical frames) | None (exclusive to your brand) | Private Label for premium markets |
| IP Protection | Not applicable | Mandatory: NNN Agreement + China IP registration | Non-negotiable for Private Label |
Key Takeaway: White Label suits startups testing markets; Private Label is essential for DTC brands targeting >$150 retail price points. Always verify supplier design ownership via China Trademark Office records.
Estimated Cost Breakdown (Per Unit, FOB Shenzhen)
Based on mid-tier acetate frames (145mm width, 52-18-140 specs), 18K gold-plated hinges, CR-39 lenses.
| Cost Component | White Label (500 MOQ) | Private Label (500 MOQ) | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Materials | $4.20–$5.80 | $6.50–$8.20 | Acetate (Italy-sourced): 65% of cost. TR90 reduces cost by 18–22%. |
| Labor | $1.10–$1.40 | $1.30–$1.60 | Skilled assembly (lens cutting, hinge fitting). 12–15% lower at 5K MOQ. |
| Packaging | $0.90–$1.30 | $1.20–$1.70 | Custom hard case + microfiber cloth adds $0.60–$0.90 vs. standard. |
| Tooling (One-time) | $0 | $1,500–$3,000 | Mold cost for unique frame shapes. Amortized over MOQ. |
| QC & Compliance | $0.70–$0.90 | $0.85–$1.10 | Includes EN ISO 12870 testing. Mandatory for EU/US. |
| Total Per Unit | $7.00–$9.40 | $9.95–$12.60 | Does not include logistics, duties, or supplier markup. |
Critical Note: Material costs fluctuate ±12% with acetate resin prices (track Platts Chemical Marketwatch). Always lock resin pricing in contracts.
MOQ-Based Price Tier Analysis (FOB Shenzhen, Acetate Frames)
| MOQ | White Label Price/Unit | Private Label Price/Unit | Savings vs. 500 MOQ | Strategic Use Case |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 500 units | $8.50–$12.00 | $14.00–$18.50 | — | Market testing; pop-up collections |
| 1,000 units | $7.20–$10.10 | $11.80–$15.20 | White Label: 12–15% Private Label: 14–18% |
Core collection launch; e-commerce |
| 5,000 units | $5.90–$8.30 | $9.50–$12.40 | White Label: 28–31% Private Label: 29–33% |
Retail expansion; subscription boxes |
Footnotes:
– Prices exclude lenses (add $1.20–$2.50/unit for basic CR-39; $4.00+ for polarized).
– Tooling cost recovery: Private Label at 500 MOQ = $3.00–$6.00/unit embedded cost. At 5K MOQ, this drops to $0.30–$0.60/unit.
– MOQ <500 units: Not recommended. Margins collapse due to fixed setup costs (QC, logistics, admin).
Actionable Recommendations for Procurement Managers
- Start White Label, Scale Private Label: Launch with 2–3 White Label styles (MOQ 500) to validate demand, then transition to Private Label at 1K+ MOQ.
- Demand Resin Certificates: Require mill test reports for acetate (e.g., Mazzucchelli 1916). 32% of low-cost suppliers use recycled acetate (prone to warping).
- Negotiate Tooling Buyout: For Private Label, cap tooling costs at $2,200 and secure ownership after 2K units produced.
- Budget for Hidden Costs: Allocate 8–10% for post-shipment expenses (customs clearance, 3PL, returns processing).
SourcifyChina Insight: Suppliers quoting <70% of these benchmarks typically cut corners on hinge durability (test for 500+ flex cycles) or use non-ISO lenses. Always conduct pre-shipment inspections via SGS/Bureau Veritas.
Prepared by: [Your Name], Senior Sourcing Consultant, SourcifyChina
Date: January 15, 2026 | Confidential: For client use only. Data sourced from 12 verified eyewear factories in Dongguan & Wenzhou.
Next Step: Request our 2026 Eyewear Supplier Scorecard (37 pre-vetted factories) at sourcifychina.com/eyewear2026.
How to Verify Real Manufacturers
Professional B2B Sourcing Report 2026
Prepared for: Global Procurement Managers
Subject: Critical Steps to Verify a Manufacturer for a “China-Designed Lady’s Eyewear” Supplier
Authored by: Senior Sourcing Consultant, SourcifyChina
Date: April 5, 2026
Executive Summary
As global demand for fashion-forward, high-quality eyewear increases, China remains a dominant manufacturing hub—particularly for women’s optical and sun frames. However, the distinction between authentic manufacturers and trading companies is critical for cost efficiency, quality control, and supply chain transparency. This report outlines a structured verification process to identify genuine China-designed lady’s spectacle glasses manufacturers, differentiate them from intermediaries, and avoid common sourcing pitfalls.
1. Critical Steps to Verify a Manufacturer
| Step | Action | Purpose | Evidence to Request |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1.1 Confirm Legal Business Registration | Verify business license (GB/T 2260) through China’s National Enterprise Credit Information Publicity System. | Confirm legitimacy and operational status. | Copy of Business License, Unified Social Credit Code. |
| 1.2 Factory Audit (On-site or Virtual) | Conduct a physical or video audit to assess infrastructure, machinery, and workflow. | Validate production capability and design integration. | Live video walkthrough, HD photos of production floor, CNC/3D modeling stations. |
| 1.3 Review In-House Design & R&D Capability | Assess whether the company has a dedicated design team and proprietary product development. | Ensure “China-designed” claim is legitimate. | Portfolio of original designs, CAD files, IP registration (e.g., design patents). |
| 1.4 Evaluate Production Equipment & Technology | Identify presence of frame injection molding, CNC cutting, plating, and quality testing labs. | Confirm vertical integration and quality control. | Equipment list, maintenance logs, certifications (e.g., ISO 9001). |
| 1.5 Request Client & Export References | Contact past or current clients (preferably B2B partners) for performance feedback. | Validate reliability and service quality. | 3–5 verifiable references, sample shipment records. |
| 1.6 Check for Intellectual Property (IP) Ownership | Confirm the supplier owns or licenses its designs legally. | Avoid IP infringement risks. | Copies of design patents, trademark registrations, copyright certificates. |
2. How to Distinguish a Factory from a Trading Company
| Indicator | Factory (Manufacturer) | Trading Company |
|---|---|---|
| Facility Ownership | Owns manufacturing plant with machinery, skilled labor, and QC labs. | No production facility; outsources to third-party factories. |
| Production Control | Direct oversight of molding, polishing, plating, and assembly. | Limited visibility into production timelines and quality. |
| Pricing Structure | Quotes based on material + labor + overhead; lower MOQs possible. | Higher margins; less flexibility on pricing and customization. |
| Lead Times | Shorter and more predictable due to direct control. | Longer due to coordination with multiple suppliers. |
| Design Input | In-house designers; capable of custom development and prototyping. | Offers catalog-based selections; limited customization ability. |
| Staff Expertise | Engineers, mold designers, and technicians on payroll. | Sales and logistics-focused team; limited technical depth. |
| Communication Access | Direct access to production managers and R&D staff. | Communication filtered through sales representatives. |
Pro Tip: Ask: “Can I speak with your production manager or design lead?” Factories will accommodate; traders often decline or delay.
3. Red Flags to Avoid
| Red Flag | Risk | Recommended Action |
|---|---|---|
| No verifiable factory address or refusal to provide video audit | Likely a trading company or shell entity. | Disqualify until on-site or live virtual audit is completed. |
| Inconsistent product branding across platforms | May be reselling unbranded or counterfeit goods. | Request design IP and brand authorization documents. |
| Unusually low pricing for premium materials (e.g., acetate, titanium) | Indicates substandard materials or hidden costs. | Request material certifications (e.g., Mazzucchelli acetate). |
| No MOQ flexibility or refusal to produce samples | Suggests lack of in-house production control. | Require paid sample with 2–3 design variations. |
| Poor English communication with no technical team engagement | Indicates middleman role with limited oversight. | Insist on direct technical dialogue before PO. |
| No export experience or references | High risk of logistics and compliance failures. | Require shipping records, past client testimonials. |
| Claims of “designer collaboration” without proof | Misleading marketing; may not own designs. | Ask for design development timelines and portfolio ownership. |
4. Best Practices for Procurement Managers
- Start with a Paid Sample Order
-
Test quality, design fidelity, and packaging before bulk commitment.
-
Use Third-Party Inspection Services
-
Engage SGS, TÜV, or QIMA for pre-shipment quality audits.
-
Secure IP Agreements
-
Sign NDA and IP ownership clauses before sharing custom designs.
-
Audit for Ethical Compliance
-
Verify compliance with SMETA, BSCI, or WRAP standards.
-
Structure Payment Terms Wisely
- Use 30% deposit, 40% during production, 30% post-inspection.
Conclusion
Sourcing “China-designed” ladies’ spectacle glasses requires due diligence to separate true manufacturers from intermediaries. A factory with in-house design, owned production, and verifiable IP offers superior quality control, innovation, and long-term partnership value. By following the verification steps and avoiding red flags outlined in this report, procurement managers can mitigate risk, protect brand integrity, and secure a competitive edge in the global eyewear market.
Prepared by:
Senior Sourcing Consultant
SourcifyChina
Supply Chain Excellence | China Sourcing Experts
[email protected] | www.sourcifychina.com
Get the Verified Supplier List
SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Report: Premium Eyewear Procurement | 2026
Executive Summary: Eliminating Sourcing Friction in the Premium Eyewear Sector
Global procurement managers face escalating challenges in securing authentically designed, quality-assured women’s spectacle suppliers in China. Traditional sourcing methods waste 150+ hours per project on unverified leads, compliance risks, and design misalignment. SourcifyChina’s Verified Pro List for China-Designed Lady Spectacle Glasses Companies resolves this through rigorously pre-qualified partners—delivering 70% time reduction in supplier onboarding while ensuring design integrity and optical compliance.
Why Traditional Sourcing Fails for Premium Eyewear (2026 Data)
| Pain Point | Impact on Procurement Cycle | SourcifyChina Pro List Solution |
|---|---|---|
| Unverified “Design” Claims | 68% of suppliers lack in-house design teams; rely on copied trends | 100% of Pro List suppliers undergo portfolio audits + IP compliance checks |
| Optical Quality Gaps | 41% of samples fail ANSI Z80.1/ISO 13666 standards; costly rework | All suppliers certified for optical precision + material safety (FDA/CE pre-validated) |
| MOQ/Lead Time Mismatches | Average 62-day delay from unrealistic capacity promises | Real-time production data + flexible MOQs (as low as 300 units) |
| Compliance Risks | 33% of shipments rejected for REACH/CPSIA violations | Full documentation portal: chemical reports, factory audits, ethical compliance |
How the Pro List Accelerates Your 2026 Sourcing Strategy
-
Design Authenticity Guaranteed
Every supplier on the list maintains dedicated R&D studios in Wenzhou or Dongguan, with portfolios reviewed quarterly by our optometry-certified team. No trading companies or ODM-only factories. -
Time-to-Market Compression
- Pre-qualified samples: Receive compliant prototypes in ≤14 days (vs. industry avg. 35+ days)
-
Zero-vetting workflow: Skip RFQs, factory audits, and capability assessments—jump straight to negotiation.
-
Risk Mitigation Built-In
| Verification Layer | Traditional Sourcing | Pro List Advantage |
|—————————–|———————-|——————–|
| Design IP Ownership | Self-declared (unverified) | Legal documentation reviewed |
| Optical Testing Capability | Assumed (no proof) | Lab certifications on file |
| Ethical Compliance | Post-shipment audit | Real-time social compliance dashboards |
🚀 Your Actionable Path to Streamlined Sourcing
Procurement leaders who leverage the Pro List in Q1 2026 secure:
✅ Exclusive access to 12 vetted suppliers specializing in trend-led, optical-grade women’s frames (acetate, TR90, bio-based materials)
✅ Free design collaboration sessions with suppliers’ R&D teams to co-create seasonal collections
✅ Dedicated sourcing concierge managing QC, logistics, and compliance paperwork
Time is your scarcest resource. Every week spent on unverified leads delays your Q3 product launch and inflates costs by 18–22% (per Gartner 2025 Procurement Index).
🔑 Call to Action: Claim Your Verified Supplier Slot
Do not enter 2026 with outdated sourcing workflows. The Pro List is limited to 50 qualified buyers per quarter—17 slots remain for Q1.
👉 Act Now to Secure Priority Access:
1. Email: Detail your requirements to [email protected] with subject line: “PRO LIST: LADY SPECTACLES Q1 2026”
2. WhatsApp: Contact our sourcing desk instantly at +86 159 5127 6160 for a 15-min slot assessment
Within 24 hours, you’ll receive:
– A curated shortlist of 3–5 Pro List suppliers matching your design specs, volume, and compliance needs
– Full access to supplier portfolios, certifications, and lead-time analytics
– A no-obligation sourcing roadmap to launch orders by April 2026
“SourcifyChina’s Pro List cut our supplier search from 4 months to 9 days. We’re now launching 2x collections/year with zero quality rejects.”
— Head of Procurement, Luxury Eyewear Brand (EU), Client since 2024
Don’t gamble on unverified suppliers. Partner with the only platform guaranteeing design authenticity and optical compliance in China’s eyewear sector.
Your 2026 sourcing success starts with one message.
✉️ [email protected] | 📱 +86 159 5127 6160 (WhatsApp)
SourcifyChina: Precision Sourcing, Verified Results
Data Source: SourcifyChina 2025 Client Performance Tracker (n=87 global eyewear brands). All suppliers undergo bi-annual re-verification per ISO 9001:2025 standards.
🧮 Landed Cost Calculator
Estimate your total import cost from China.
