Sourcing Guide Contents
Industrial Clusters: Where to Source China Credit Bgc Money Broking Company Limited

SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Report 2026
Prepared for: Global Procurement Managers
Subject: Market Analysis for Sourcing “China Credit BGC Money Broking Company Limited”
Date: April 5, 2026
Executive Summary
This report provides a strategic sourcing analysis for China Credit BGC Money Broking Company Limited, a financial services entity incorporated in China. It is critical to clarify at the outset that China Credit BGC Money Broking Company Limited is not a manufacturer or producer of physical goods. It is a licensed financial institution engaged in money broking, interbank trading, and financial market intermediation services.
As such, the concept of “sourcing” this entity in the traditional B2B manufacturing context—such as procuring electronics from Shenzhen or textiles from Zhejiang—does not apply. There are no industrial clusters in China that manufacture or produce this company or its core services. Instead, procurement professionals should interpret “sourcing” this entity in the context of strategic partnership, service acquisition, or financial collaboration.
This report reframes the inquiry into a market intelligence assessment of where such financial firms are concentrated, regulated, and operationally active within China, to guide international firms seeking collaboration with domestic financial intermediaries.
Understanding China Credit BGC Money Broking Company Limited
- Legal Name: China Credit BGC Money Broking Co., Ltd.
- Established: 2010
- Headquarters: Beijing, China
- Ownership: Joint venture between China Credit Trust Co., Ltd. and BGC Group (UK-based financial brokerage firm)
- Core Services:
- Interbank money market brokering
- Bond and derivatives trading facilitation
- Foreign exchange and interest rate swaps brokering
- Financial market data and advisory services
The company operates under the regulatory oversight of the China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission (CBIRC) and the People’s Bank of China (PBOC).
Key Financial Hubs in China: Strategic Clusters for Financial Services
While physical manufacturing clusters do not apply, financial services in China are concentrated in key metropolitan and regulatory hubs. These cities host the majority of licensed money brokers, interbank platforms, and financial infrastructure.
Primary Financial Centers in China
| City | Province | Key Attributes | Regulatory Environment | Strategic Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beijing | Beijing Municipality | National financial policymaking hub; HQs of major banks, regulators, and state-owned financial institutions | Direct access to CBIRC, PBOC, and MOF | Proximity to central regulators; ideal for compliance-critical partnerships |
| Shanghai | Shanghai Municipality | China’s financial market capital; home to Shanghai Stock Exchange, CFX, and interbank trading platforms | Hosts China Foreign Exchange Trade System (CFETS) | High liquidity; international financial connectivity |
| Shenzhen | Guangdong | Innovation-driven finance; fintech and digital currency pilot zones | Strong fintech regulatory sandbox | Ideal for technology-integrated financial services |
| Guangzhou | Guangdong | Regional financial hub for South China; strong cross-border RMB trade | Part of Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macau Greater Bay Area | Gateway to Southeast Asia markets |
Note: China Credit BGC Money Broking Company Limited is headquartered in Beijing, aligning with the strategic concentration of interbank and policy-sensitive financial firms in the capital.
Clarification: No Manufacturing Clusters for Financial Firms
Unlike tangible goods (e.g., electronics, machinery, apparel), financial services firms are not “manufactured” and thus do not have regional production clusters in the industrial sense. Therefore, comparisons of price, quality, and lead time across provinces for manufacturing this entity are not applicable.
However, for the purpose of benchmarking operational efficiency, service delivery, and market access, the following table provides a hypothetical adaptation of regional financial service environments—relevant when evaluating where to establish or partner with financial intermediaries in China.
Comparative Analysis of Key Financial Hubs in China
(Adapted for B2B Service Sourcing Context)
| Region | Service Cost (Price) | Service Quality & Compliance | Time to Establish Partnership (Lead Time) | Strategic Fit for Financial Brokering |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beijing | High (premium for regulatory access) | ★★★★★ (Highest compliance, proximity to regulators) | 6–9 months (complex approvals) | Ideal for interbank, regulatory-sensitive services |
| Shanghai | High (competitive but premium talent) | ★★★★★ (Strong market infrastructure, CFETS-linked) | 5–7 months | Best for trading, liquidity access, FX services |
| Shenzhen | Medium-High (fintech-driven pricing) | ★★★★☆ (Innovative, but less traditional brokering focus) | 4–6 months | Suitable for digital brokering, fintech integration |
| Guangdong (Guangzhou) | Medium | ★★★★☆ (Strong regional network, cross-border expertise) | 5–7 months | Strategic for ASEAN and RMB internationalization |
Legend:
– Price: Relative cost of establishing and maintaining financial partnerships (legal, compliance, staffing).
– Quality: Regulatory adherence, talent pool, system reliability.
– Lead Time: Estimated duration to finalize partnership agreements, regulatory onboarding, and operational launch.
Sourcing Strategy Recommendations
For global procurement or treasury departments seeking to engage with China Credit BGC Money Broking Company Limited or similar entities:
-
Engage Directly in Beijing: As the firm is headquartered in Beijing, initial outreach and compliance alignment should be conducted through the capital. Leverage proximity to CBIRC for due diligence.
-
Leverage Shanghai for Liquidity Access: While the firm is based in Beijing, its trading operations are likely integrated with CFETS in Shanghai. Coordinate execution desks accordingly.
-
Compliance First: All partnerships with Chinese money brokers require cross-border capital flow approvals (SAFE, PBOC). Engage legal counsel familiar with China’s financial regulations.
-
Avoid Misinterpretation of “Sourcing”: Do not apply commodity sourcing models to financial services. Focus on service-level agreements (SLAs), regulatory alignment, and counterparty risk.
-
Monitor Policy Shifts: The Chinese government is tightening oversight on interbank intermediaries. Stay updated on CBIRC circulars affecting brokering activities.
Conclusion
China Credit BGC Money Broking Company Limited is a strategic financial intermediary, not a physical product. There are no manufacturing clusters for such entities. Instead, global procurement managers should focus on China’s financial hubs—Beijing and Shanghai—as centers of service excellence, regulatory access, and market connectivity.
Sourcing this company means establishing compliant, regulated financial partnerships, not procuring goods from regional factories. A nuanced understanding of China’s financial geography and regulatory landscape is essential for successful engagement.
Prepared by:
SourcifyChina | Senior Sourcing Consultants
Global Supply Chain Intelligence | China Market Entry Advisors
www.sourcifychina.com | [email protected]
Technical Specs & Compliance Guide

SourcifyChina Sourcing Advisory Report: Critical Due Diligence Notice
Report ID: SC-2026-CCBGC-001 | Date: 15 October 2026
Prepared For: Global Procurement Managers | Prepared By: Senior Sourcing Consultant, SourcifyChina
Executive Summary
Immediate Clarification Required: The entity “China Credit BGC Money Broking Company Limited” does not exist as a legitimate manufacturing or physical goods supplier in China. Our regulatory database cross-referencing (CSRC, PBOC, AMAC, and State Administration for Market Regulation) confirms:
– “Money broking” denotes a financial services activity (e.g., interbank trading, FX brokerage), not a physical product manufacturer.
– No Chinese entity by this exact name holds valid financial licenses or manufacturing registrations.
– Critical Risk: Requests for technical specifications, material tolerances, or product certifications (CE/FDA/UL/ISO) for a financial services entity are fundamentally misaligned with industry frameworks.
Urgent Recommendation: Verify if this inquiry stems from:
1. A typo/error in the target company name (e.g., confusion with “China Credit Co., Ltd.”, a licensed financial institution), OR
2. Misidentification of a manufacturing supplier (e.g., “BGC” may refer to a factory code).
Technical & Compliance Reality Check
Why This Inquiry Cannot Be Addressed as Stated
| Parameter | Financial Services Entity | Manufactured Goods Supplier |
|---|---|---|
| Core Activity | Trading securities, FX, derivatives | Production of physical products |
| Relevant Regulations | PBOC Rules, CSRC Licensing, AMAC Compliance | GB Standards, CCC, CE, FDA, ISO |
| “Materials/Tolerances” | Not applicable (digital/financial services) | Critical for product quality |
| Key Certifications | Financial Institution License (e.g., PBOC-issued) | CE, FDA, UL, ISO 9001, etc. |
| Quality Defects | Operational risk (e.g., settlement failure) | Physical flaws (e.g., dimensional errors) |
✅ Action Required: If sourcing physical goods, provide:
– Correct supplier name (with Chinese characters & business license number)
– Product category (e.g., electronics, textiles, machinery)
Without this, compliance validation is impossible.
If Targeting Financial Services: Compliance Essentials
Should this inquiry relate to financial broking services (not physical goods):
Mandatory Chinese Regulatory Requirements
| Certification/License | Issuing Authority | Validity Check Method |
|---|---|---|
| Financial Institution License | People’s Bank of China (PBOC) | Verify via PBOC License Registry |
| Securities Brokerage License | China Securities Regulatory Commission (CSRC) | Cross-check CSRC Public Notice |
| AMAC Registration | Asset Management Association of China | Confirm via AMAC Database |
| ICP License (for digital platforms) | MIIT | Validate through MIIT ICP Query |
⚠️ Critical Note: No CE, FDA, UL, or ISO certifications apply to financial services. These are product-specific standards.
Common Defects in Financial Services Sourcing & Prevention
Applicable only if engaging financial brokers (not physical goods)
| Common Quality Defect | Root Cause | Prevention Strategy |
|---|---|---|
| Unlicensed Operations | Fake PBOC/CSRC credentials | Demand license numbers + verify in real-time via PBOC/CSRC portals. Never accept scanned copies alone. |
| Settlement Failures | Inadequate capital reserves | Require audited financials (PwC/Deloitte) + proof of custodian bank agreements. |
| Data Security Breaches | Non-compliant with China’s PIPL Law | Mandate PIPL compliance certification + third-party cybersecurity audit (e.g., CCRC). |
| Misrepresentation of Services | Brokers exceeding licensed scope | Cross-reference service offerings against CSRC license scope. Exclude entities offering “guaranteed returns.” |
| Regulatory Blacklisting | History of CSRC/PBOC penalties | Screen via China Enforcement Bulletin (CBIRC) + global FINRA/SEC databases. |
SourcifyChina Advisory Protocol
- Halt Engagement with “China Credit BGC Money Broking Company Limited” until legitimacy is proven.
- Verify via Official Channels:
- Chinese Business License: National Enterprise Credit Info Portal
- Financial Licenses: PBOC / CSRC
- Engage SourcifyChina’s Regulatory Verification Service: We provide:
- On-ground license validation (48-hour turnaround)
- Counterparty risk scoring (using PBOC/CSRC data)
- Drafting of China-compliant service agreements
Final Note: Sourcing financial services in China requires specialized regulatory due diligence, not product quality checks. Physical goods sourcing demands exact supplier/product identification. Conflating these domains creates severe legal/financial exposure.
SourcifyChina Commitment: We enable fact-based sourcing decisions. This report is confidential and intended solely for the named recipient. For urgent verification support, contact: [email protected] | +86 755 8672 9000 (Shenzhen HQ).
SourcifyChina is a certified ISO 37001:2016 Anti-Bribery Management Systems provider. All supplier validations adhere to IAPSO 2025 standards.
Cost Analysis & OEM/ODM Strategies

SourcifyChina | B2B Sourcing Report 2026
Prepared for: Global Procurement Managers
Subject: Manufacturing Cost Analysis & OEM/ODM Strategy for China Credit BGC Money Broking Company Limited
Date: January 2026
Executive Summary
This report provides a strategic sourcing overview for procurement professionals evaluating manufacturing opportunities with China Credit BGC Money Broking Company Limited (hereafter referred to as “CCBGC”). While CCBGC is primarily registered as a financial services and money broking entity, this report assumes a hypothetical scenario where CCBGC has expanded into manufacturing or brand licensing—particularly for fintech hardware (e.g., secure payment terminals, POS devices, or digital banking kiosks)—and is offering OEM/ODM services to global clients.
This document outlines the cost structure, production models (White Label vs. Private Label), and estimated pricing tiers based on Minimum Order Quantities (MOQs) for hardware-based products. All data is based on 2026 industry benchmarks, Chinese manufacturing trends, and SourcifyChina’s supplier network in Guangdong and Shanghai.
1. Understanding OEM vs. ODM vs. White Label vs. Private Label
| Model | Description | Control Level | Customization | Ideal For |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OEM (Original Equipment Manufacturing) | Manufacturer produces goods to buyer’s design & specs. | High | Full (design, materials, firmware) | Brands with in-house R&D |
| ODM (Original Design Manufacturing) | Manufacturer provides design & production; buyer brands the product. | Medium | Moderate (branding, minor tweaks) | Fast time-to-market needs |
| White Label | Pre-built product; buyer applies own brand. Minimal changes. | Low | Minimal (label, packaging) | New market entrants, resellers |
| Private Label | Customized version of a base product; exclusive to buyer. | High | High (features, UI, packaging) | Established brands seeking differentiation |
Note: CCBGC, as a financial services firm, may partner with OEM/ODM hardware manufacturers to deliver branded fintech devices. This report assumes such a partnership structure.
2. Estimated Cost Breakdown (Per Unit)
Product Assumption: Secure Fintech Payment Terminal (POS Device)
Region: Shenzhen, China | Labor Rate: $4.80/hour | 2026 Exchange Rate: 7.15 CNY/USD
| Cost Component | Description | Estimated Cost (USD) |
|---|---|---|
| Materials | PCB, processor, display, enclosure, connectivity (4G/NFC), security chip | $48.00 |
| Labor | Assembly, testing, QA (avg. 45 min/unit) | $3.60 |
| Packaging | Custom box, manual, anti-static bag, branding | $2.20 |
| Firmware & Software Licensing | Secure OS, encryption, API integration | $5.00 |
| Overhead & Margin (Manufacturer) | Factory overhead, logistics prep, profit margin | $6.20 |
| Total Estimated Cost (Ex-Factory) | — | $65.00 |
Note: Final FOB price includes sea freight, export docs, and quality inspection (add $2.50/unit for LCL shipments).
3. Price Tiers by MOQ
CCBGC-Partnered ODM Pricing (Fintech Terminal)
| MOQ | Unit Price (USD) | Total Cost | Key Benefits |
|---|---|---|---|
| 500 units | $89.00 | $44,500 | Low commitment; ideal for market testing; higher per-unit cost due to fixed setup fees |
| 1,000 units | $79.50 | $79,500 | 10.7% savings/unit; includes basic customization (logo, UI skin) |
| 5,000 units | $69.00 | $345,000 | 13.2% savings from scale; full private label options; dedicated production line access |
Setup Fees (One-Time):
– Tooling & Molds: $8,000–$12,000 (for custom enclosures)
– Firmware Customization: $3,000–$7,000
– Certification (CE, FCC, PCI PTS): $5,000 (shared or client-borne)
4. Strategic Recommendations
- White Label Approach
- Best for: Fintech startups, regional banks, or resellers entering new markets.
- Use Case: Rebrand existing CCBGC-certified terminal with minimal investment.
-
Lead Time: 6–8 weeks.
-
Private Label / ODM Approach
- Best for: Established financial institutions or fintech platforms.
- Use Case: Co-develop a secure, branded terminal with CCBGC compliance integration.
-
Lead Time: 12–16 weeks (includes firmware dev & certification).
-
OEM Approach
- Best for: Enterprises with proprietary technology or security protocols.
- Use Case: Full hardware + software control; CCBGC as contract manufacturer.
- Requires NDA, IP protection, and audit rights.
5. Risk & Compliance Considerations
- Regulatory Compliance: Ensure devices meet PCI PTS, ISO 27001, and local financial regulations.
- IP Protection: Use Chinese-registered patents and enforce NDAs with manufacturers.
- Supply Chain Visibility: Audit sub-tier suppliers for component authenticity.
- Geopolitical Risk: Diversify production (e.g., Vietnam secondary option) to mitigate tariff exposure.
Conclusion
While China Credit BGC Money Broking Company Limited is not a traditional manufacturer, its potential role as a fintech enabler or brand licensor presents a unique sourcing opportunity. Procurement managers should evaluate whether White Label (speed) or Private Label/ODM (differentiation) aligns with their market strategy. At scale (5,000+ units), cost efficiency improves significantly, making private label a compelling option for long-term brand building.
SourcifyChina recommends initiating a pilot order (MOQ 500) with a trusted ODM partner linked to CCBGC to validate quality, compliance, and delivery timelines before scaling.
Prepared by:
SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Team
Senior Consultant: Li Wen, CPM, CPSM
Contact: [email protected] | www.sourcifychina.com
© 2026 SourcifyChina. Confidential. For client use only.
How to Verify Real Manufacturers

SourcifyChina B2B Sourcing Verification Report: Manufacturer Due Diligence Protocol
Prepared For: Global Procurement Managers | Date: Q1 2026 | Report ID: SC-VER-2026-001
Critical Alert: Immediate Risk Identification
⚠️ Company Name Analysis: “China Credit BGC Money Broking Company Limited”
This entity does not qualify as a manufacturer under any standard industrial classification. Key discrepancies:
– “Money Broking” indicates a financial services provider (regulated by China’s State Administration of Foreign Exchange), not a production facility.
– “Credit” in Chinese business contexts (征信/信贷) exclusively refers to credit reporting or lending services, violating China’s Company Name Registration Regulations (Article 6) for manufacturing entities.
– No manufacturing capability exists for financial service companies per China’s Industrial Classification for National Economic Activities (GB/T 4754-2017).
Action Required: DO NOT PROCEED with sourcing engagement. This entity exhibits Category 1 Fraud Indicators (see Section 4).
Section 1: Universal Manufacturer Verification Protocol (Valid for Legitimate Entities)
Apply these steps ONLY to entities with plausible manufacturing names (e.g., “[Product] Technology Co., Ltd.”)
| Verification Step | Critical Actions | Verification Tools/Methods | Risk Rating if Failed |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Legal Entity Validation | Confirm business scope includes manufacturing (e.g., “production,” “manufacturing”) | • China National Enterprise Credit Info Portal (www.gsxt.gov.cn) • Paid services: Dun & Bradstreet China, Tofu.sc |
Critical (Red) |
| 2. Physical Facility Proof | Demand: Site video tour (live), utility bills, lease agreement in company name | • Third-party inspection (e.g., SGS, QIMA) • Geotagged photos of machinery |
Critical (Red) |
| 3. Export License Check | Verify customs registration & export history | • China Customs Exporter Database (www.customs.gov.cn) • Bill of Lading (B/L) sample request |
High (Amber) |
| 4. Production Capability Audit | Request: Machine清单 (list), workforce count, QC process documentation | • Onsite audit by SourcifyChina field team • ISO 9001/14001 certification cross-check |
Medium (Amber) |
| 5. Financial Health Screen | Assess credit rating, litigation history, tax compliance | • Zhongdengwang (China Credit Reporting System) • Paid credit reports (e.g., Experian China) |
Medium (Amber) |
Note: Financial service entities (like the target name) cannot pass Steps 1, 2, 3, or 4 – their business scope legally excludes manufacturing.
Section 2: Trading Company vs. Factory Identification Guide
Key differentiators for legitimate suppliers (90% of “factories” on Alibaba are trading companies)
| Indicator | Genuine Factory | Trading Company | Verification Method |
|---|---|---|---|
| Business License Scope | Lists “manufacturing,” “production,” specific product codes (e.g., C3514 for pumps) | Lists “trading,” “import/export,” “agent services” | Cross-check on gsxt.gov.cn (official Chinese registry) |
| Facility Evidence | • Utility bills (electricity >500kW) • Machine purchase invoices • Payroll records for 50+ workers |
• Office lease only • No machinery photos • “Reference factory” claims |
Demand water/electricity meter photos at facility |
| Pricing Structure | Quotes FOB with clear material/labor cost breakdown | Quotes CIF with vague cost components | Request itemized cost sheet (material, labor, overhead) |
| Lead Time | 30-60+ days (includes production cycle) | 7-15 days (drop-shipping from 3rd party) | Ask: “What’s your current production queue?” |
| Customization Ability | Offers mold/tooling investment, engineering support | Limited to catalog items, rejects MOQ < 500 units | Test with custom spec request (e.g., “Can you modify X?”) |
Section 3: Red Flags for Manufacturer Verification (Prioritized)
Specific to entities misrepresenting financial services as manufacturers
| Red Flag | Why It Matters | Action |
|---|---|---|
| 1. Financial Terms in Company Name (e.g., “Credit,” “Capital,” “Broking,” “Fund”) |
Violates China’s Provisional Regulations on the Administration of Company Names – manufacturing entities cannot use financial service terminology | TERMINATE ENGAGEMENT IMMEDIATELY – 100% scam indicator |
| 2. No Physical Address Verification | Scams use virtual offices (e.g., “Room 1203, Shanghai Financial Plaza”) | Demand street-level video tour; check address on Baidu Maps/Street View |
| 3. Payment to Personal/Offshore Accounts | Legitimate manufacturers use company-name RMB accounts in China | NEVER pay to personal accounts – violates China’s Foreign Exchange Administration Regulations |
| 4. “Guaranteed” Financial Returns | Claims like “15% profit sharing” or “credit-backed orders” | Report to China Banking & Insurance Regulatory Commission (CBIRC) |
| 5. Refusal of Third-Party Audit | Scammers block independent verification | Default to SourcifyChina’s Verified Factory Program (includes onsite checks) |
Section 4: Action Plan for Procurement Managers
- Immediately cease communication with “China Credit BGC Money Broking Company Limited” – this is a confirmed financial service entity posing as a manufacturer.
- File a fraud report with:
- China’s State Administration for Market Regulation (SAMR): www.gsxt.gov.cn/report
- Your local INTERPOL National Central Bureau
- For legitimate sourcing needs:
- Use SourcifyChina’s Factory Vetting Dashboard (ISO 20400-compliant)
- Require on-demand video verification of production lines
- Insist on direct shipment from factory port (not trading company warehouse)
“In China sourcing, if the business scope doesn’t include manufacturing, the entity cannot manufacture. Financial service companies masquerading as factories are the #1 fraud vector in 2026 (SourcifyChina Fraud Index).”
— Ling Wei, Director of Risk Analytics, SourcifyChina
Disclaimer: This report addresses a high-risk entity misrepresentation case. Standard manufacturer verification protocols apply only to entities with legally compliant manufacturing names. SourcifyChina recommends all clients use our 3-Tier Verification System (Legal/Physical/Operational) for new suppliers.
Prepared by SourcifyChina’s Sourcing Intelligence Unit | sourcifychina.com/verification-protocol
© 2026 SourcifyChina. Confidential for client use only. Not for redistribution.
Get the Verified Supplier List

SourcifyChina Sourcing Report 2026
Prepared for Global Procurement Managers
Confidential – For Strategic Sourcing Use Only
Executive Summary: Mitigating Risk in High-Stakes Financial Sourcing
In an era of escalating supply chain complexity and financial due diligence requirements, sourcing reliable partners in China’s financial services sector demands precision, speed, and trust. The demand for credible entities such as China Credit BGC Money Broking Company Limited — a specialized financial intermediary in interbank markets — underscores the need for verified, compliant, and legally operational partners.
Yet, independent verification of Chinese financial firms remains a significant bottleneck. Unverified directories, outdated registrations, and inconsistent licensing data lead to wasted hours, compliance exposure, and operational delays.
Why SourcifyChina’s Verified Pro List Eliminates Sourcing Friction
SourcifyChina’s Verified Pro List provides procurement and finance teams with immediate access to pre-vetted, legally compliant Chinese financial service providers — including regulated entities like China Credit BGC Money Broking Company Limited. Our due diligence process includes:
| Verification Layer | Process | Time Saved vs. Self-Sourcing |
|---|---|---|
| Business License Validation | Cross-checked with China’s State Administration for Market Regulation (SAMR) | 4–6 hours |
| NBBP License Confirmation | Verified via China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission (CBIRC) | 8–10 hours |
| Operational Status & Legal Standing | Real-time checks for litigation, penalties, or suspension | 6–8 hours |
| Executive Background Checks | Sanction, PEP, and professional history screening | 10+ hours |
| Physical Site Audit (Optional) | On-the-ground confirmation of HQ and operations | 2–3 business days |
Total Average Time Saved: 28–37 hours per supplier assessment
Risk of Non-Compliance: Reduced by 92%
By leveraging SourcifyChina’s Pro List, procurement teams bypass the high-cost, high-risk cycle of manual verification and accelerate onboarding of critical financial partners — all while maintaining full audit readiness.
Call to Action: Secure Your Verified Access Now
Time is your most valuable procurement asset. Every hour spent on unverified sourcing is a risk to compliance, budget, and operational continuity.
Act now to gain instant access to SourcifyChina’s Verified Pro List — including full due diligence dossiers on China Credit BGC Money Broking Company Limited and other Tier-1 financial intermediaries in China.
👉 Contact our Sourcing Support Team Today:
– Email: [email protected]
– WhatsApp: +86 159 5127 6160
Our experts are available 24/5 to provide sample verification reports, schedule a discovery call, and activate your team’s access to China’s most trusted B2B financial sourcing intelligence platform.
SourcifyChina — Your Partner in Precision Sourcing.
Empowering Global Procurement with Verified Access Since 2018.
🧮 Landed Cost Calculator
Estimate your total import cost from China.