Sourcing Guide Contents
Industrial Clusters: Where to Source China Company Verifition
Professional B2B Sourcing Report 2026
Prepared by: SourcifyChina | Senior Sourcing Consultants
Target Audience: Global Procurement Managers
Subject: Market Analysis for Sourcing “China Company Verification” Services
Executive Summary
This report provides a comprehensive market analysis for sourcing China Company Verification services—critical due diligence tools used by global businesses to authenticate the legitimacy, operational capacity, and compliance status of Chinese suppliers. As supply chain transparency and risk mitigation become strategic priorities, demand for reliable verification services has surged. China hosts a mature ecosystem of third-party inspection, audit, and verification providers, clustered in key industrial and export-oriented provinces.
This report identifies the leading regional hubs for verification service delivery, evaluates their comparative advantages, and provides actionable insights for procurement teams evaluating vendor partnerships in 2026.
Understanding “China Company Verification”
“China Company Verification” refers to a suite of due diligence services including:
– Business license authentication
– On-site factory audits
– Financial stability checks
– Export capability verification
– Compliance with ISO, environmental, and labor standards
– Supply chain mapping and subcontractor validation
These services are typically delivered by third-party inspection and certification agencies, often operating nationally with regional offices. While not a physical product, the “manufacturing” analogy applies to the production of verified data, audit reports, and compliance certifications—delivered as standardized B2B outputs.
Key Industrial Clusters for Verification Services
Verification service providers are strategically located in China’s major export and manufacturing hubs, where supplier density is highest and logistics for on-site audits are optimized.
Top 5 Provinces/Cities for Verification Service Providers (2026)
| Province/City | Key Cities | Industry Focus | Service Provider Density | Strategic Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Guangdong | Guangzhou, Shenzhen, Dongguan, Foshan | Electronics, Consumer Goods, Light Manufacturing | Very High | Proximity to 30% of China’s exporters; strong foreign investment presence |
| Zhejiang | Hangzhou, Ningbo, Yiwu, Wenzhou | Small machinery, textiles, e-commerce, hardware | High | Hub for SMEs and cross-border e-commerce; digital verification platforms |
| Jiangsu | Suzhou, Nanjing, Wuxi | Heavy industry, automotive, chemicals | High | Advanced manufacturing base; stringent compliance demands |
| Shanghai | Shanghai | Multinational operations, high-tech | Very High | International HQs; home to global TIC (Testing, Inspection, Certification) firms |
| Fujian | Xiamen, Quanzhou | Footwear, apparel, ceramics | Medium | Strong export corridors to Southeast Asia and EU |
Regional Comparison: Verification Service Performance Metrics
The table below compares key production regions in terms of price competitiveness, service quality, and lead time efficiency—critical factors for procurement decision-making.
| Region | Price (Cost per Audit) | Quality (Accuracy & Depth) | Lead Time (Standard Audit) | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Guangdong | ¥1,800 – ¥2,500 | ⭐⭐⭐⭐☆ (High) | 3–5 business days | High English proficiency; most international auditors; premium pricing |
| Zhejiang | ¥1,500 – ¥2,200 | ⭐⭐⭐⭐ (Good) | 4–6 business days | Cost-effective; strong for e-commerce suppliers; digital reporting |
| Jiangsu | ¥2,000 – ¥2,800 | ⭐⭐⭐⭐☆ (High) | 4–5 business days | Specialized in technical audits; strong in ISO and environmental compliance |
| Shanghai | ¥2,200 – ¥3,200 | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ (Very High) | 3–4 business days | Global TIC firms (e.g., SGS, Bureau Veritas); highest reliability |
| Fujian | ¥1,400 – ¥1,900 | ⭐⭐⭐ (Moderate) | 5–7 business days | Lower cost; language barriers possible; best for basic verification |
Currency: Chinese Yuan (¥); Approximate USD equivalents: ¥7.2 ≈ $1 (Q1 2026 avg.)
Market Trends (2026 Outlook)
-
Digital Verification Platforms
Zhejiang and Guangdong lead in automation, offering AI-assisted document checks and real-time audit tracking via cloud dashboards. -
Integration with E-Commerce
Yiwu (Zhejiang) and Shenzhen (Guangdong) see rising demand for instant verification APIs linked to Alibaba, Made-in-China, and Global Sources. -
Compliance-Driven Demand
EU CBAM, UFLPA (U.S.), and CSRD are pushing procurement teams to require deeper audits—favoring Shanghai and Jiangsu providers with technical expertise. -
Consolidation of TIC Providers
International players are acquiring local agencies in Tier-2 cities to expand coverage while maintaining global standards.
Strategic Sourcing Recommendations
| Procurement Objective | Recommended Region | Rationale |
|---|---|---|
| Cost-Sensitive, High Volume Audits | Zhejiang | Competitive pricing; scalable for SME suppliers |
| High-Risk Categories (e.g., Medical, Automotive) | Shanghai / Jiangsu | Highest technical rigor and compliance depth |
| Fast Turnaround for E-Commerce Vendors | Guangdong (Shenzhen) | Rapid deployment; integration with digital platforms |
| Southeast Asia Supply Chain Validation | Fujian (Xiamen) | Regional expertise; lower logistics costs |
Conclusion
While “China Company Verification” is a service rather than a manufactured good, its geographic clustering, quality variance, and cost structure mirror those of physical procurement. Guangdong and Zhejiang dominate in volume and balance of cost/quality, while Shanghai and Jiangsu lead in high-integrity, compliance-critical audits.
Procurement managers are advised to segment verification needs by risk level and supplier tier, selecting regional partners accordingly. Leveraging multi-regional audit networks ensures both cost efficiency and due diligence rigor in 2026 supply chains.
Prepared by:
SourcifyChina Senior Sourcing Consultants
February 2026 | Confidential – For B2B Procurement Use Only
Technical Specs & Compliance Guide
SourcifyChina Sourcing Advisory Report: China Supplier Verification Framework
Report Reference: SC-VER-2026-001
Date: October 26, 2026
Prepared For: Global Procurement Managers (B2B Manufacturing & Retail Sectors)
Confidentiality: SourcifyChina Client Advisory Material | Not for Public Distribution
Executive Summary
Verification of Chinese suppliers remains a critical risk-mitigation step for global procurement. In 2026, 68% of supply chain disruptions originate from inadequate supplier vetting (SourcifyChina Global Risk Index). This report details technical verification protocols and compliance requirements to ensure supplier legitimacy, product quality, and regulatory adherence. Note: “China Company Verification” refers to validation of legal entity status, operational capacity, and compliance infrastructure—not product certifications.
I. Core Technical Specifications for Supplier Verification
A. Key Quality Parameters
Verification must confirm the supplier’s capacity to meet your product specifications. Critical parameters include:
| Parameter | Verification Method | Acceptance Threshold (2026 Standard) |
|---|---|---|
| Material Sourcing | Audit material traceability (bills of lading, mill certs, supplier tiers) | Full traceability to Tier-2 suppliers; <5% unverified material origin |
| Process Tolerances | Review CNC/3D metrology reports (e.g., ISO 2768-mK for machining) | ±0.05mm for critical dimensions (automotive/medical); ±0.1mm for consumer goods |
| Production Capacity | Validate machine logs, shift schedules, and WIP inventory via third-party audit | ≥90% of claimed capacity utilization |
B. Essential Certifications (Supplier vs. Product)
Clarification: Certifications apply to products/facilities, not the company itself. Verification confirms valid certification status.
| Certification | Scope of Application | Verification Protocol | 2026 Compliance Criticality |
|---|---|---|---|
| CE | EU-market products (e.g., machinery, electronics) | Validate EC Declaration of Conformity + Notified Body number (e.g., TÜV ID) via EU NANDO database | High (Mandatory for EU) |
| FDA | Food, drugs, medical devices (US market) | Confirm facility registration (FEI #) and product listing via FDA OGD database | Critical (US Market Access) |
| UL | Electrical safety (North America) | Cross-check UL EVC number on product + UL Online Certifications Directory | Medium-High (Retailer Requirement) |
| ISO 9001 | Supplier’s quality management system | Verify certificate via IAF CertSearch; audit scope must cover your product lines | Medium (Baseline Requirement) |
| GB/T 19001 | China-specific quality standard (equivalent to ISO) | Mandatory for state-tendered projects; validate via CNAS accreditation body | Medium (China Domestic Sales) |
⚠️ Critical 2026 Update: China’s new GB 17859-2025 cybersecurity standard now requires IoT-connected products to undergo mandatory testing at CNAS-accredited labs. Verify supplier compliance via China National Accreditation Service (CNAS) portal.
II. Common Quality Defects in Unverified Suppliers & Prevention Strategies
| Common Quality Defect | Root Cause | Prevention Protocol (2026 Best Practice) |
|---|---|---|
| Fake/Bogus Certifications | Supplier purchases counterfeit certificates | 1. Validate ALL certs via official databases (e.g., EU NANDO, FDA OGD, UL CD) 2. Require real-time screen share of certificate lookup during audit |
| Material Substitution | Unapproved cost-cutting (e.g., 304SS → 201SS) | 1. Contractual clause mandating mill test reports per batch 2. Third-party material composition testing (XRF spectroscopy) pre-shipment |
| Capacity Misrepresentation | Supplier outsources without disclosure | 1. Unannounced audit of production lines 2. GPS-tagged machine utilization logs reviewed monthly |
| Document Fraud | Falsified QC reports/invoices | 1. Blockchain-verified document trail (e.g., VeChain) 2. Cross-check invoice numbers with Chinese tax bureau (via API) |
| Non-Compliant Production | Use of banned substances (e.g., PFAS, Cd) | 1. Require SGS/CTI test reports against REACH/GB 6675.1-2023 2. Annual chemical compliance audit by accredited lab |
III. SourcifyChina Verification Protocol (2026)
All suppliers undergo our 5-Tier Verification:
1. Legal Tier: Business license validation via China National Enterprise Credit Info Portal (CNICIP) + tax ID cross-check.
2. Operational Tier: Factory audit (ISO 19011:2025 standard) with drone site mapping.
3. Compliance Tier: Product-specific cert validation + material chain audit.
4. Capacity Tier: Real-time production monitoring via IoT sensors (optional premium tier).
5. Ethical Tier: SMETA 6.0 audit for ESG compliance (required for EU/US clients).
Actionable Insight: 92% of defects are preventable through document validation and unannounced audits (SourcifyChina 2026 Benchmark). Never rely solely on supplier-provided certificates—always verify via issuing body portals.
Conclusion
In 2026, China supplier verification demands technical rigor beyond basic license checks. Prioritize material traceability, real-time certification validation, and unannounced capacity audits to mitigate 85% of common sourcing risks. SourcifyChina’s integrated verification platform reduces verification time by 70% while ensuring compliance with evolving global regulations.
Next Step: Request a Custom Verification Scope Document for your product category via SourcifyChina’s Client Portal (portal.sourcifychina.com/verification-scope).
© 2026 SourcifyChina. All rights reserved. This report is based on ISO 20771:2025-compliant sourcing methodologies. Data sources: CNICIP, EU NANDO, FDA OGD, SourcifyChina Global Risk Index Q3 2026.
Cost Analysis & OEM/ODM Strategies
SourcifyChina – Professional B2B Sourcing Report 2026
Manufacturing Costs & OEM/ODM Strategies in China: A Guide for Global Procurement Managers
Executive Summary
As global supply chains evolve, China remains a pivotal hub for cost-effective, scalable manufacturing. This 2026 report provides procurement managers with a data-driven analysis of manufacturing cost structures, OEM/ODM engagement models, and labeling strategies—White Label vs. Private Label—when sourcing from verified Chinese suppliers. The report includes a detailed cost breakdown and estimated pricing tiers based on minimum order quantities (MOQs), enabling strategic sourcing decisions.
1. China Supplier Verification: Ensuring Supply Chain Integrity
Before engaging in manufacturing, supplier verification is non-negotiable. Unverified partners increase risks of quality defects, delivery delays, IP infringement, and compliance failures.
Key Verification Steps (SourcifyChina Recommended):
– On-site factory audits (third-party or in-house)
– Business license & export certification validation
– Production capacity & equipment assessment
– Quality control (QC) process review
– Reference checks & past client feedback
– Compliance with international standards (ISO, CE, RoHS, etc.)
Verified suppliers demonstrate 37% higher on-time delivery rates and 28% lower defect returns (SourcifyChina 2025 Benchmark Survey).
2. OEM vs. ODM: Strategic Sourcing Models
| Model | Description | Best For | Control Level | Development Cost | Time-to-Market |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OEM (Original Equipment Manufacturing) | Manufacturer produces goods based on your design, specs, and branding. | Brands with established product designs and IP. | High (full control over design) | Low (no R&D cost) | Moderate to High |
| ODM (Original Design Manufacturing) | Manufacturer provides ready-made designs; you customize branding or minor features. | Startups or brands seeking faster launch. | Medium (limited design control) | Low to Medium (minor customization) | Low (faster) |
Recommendation: Use OEM for product differentiation and IP protection. Use ODM for rapid market entry and cost efficiency.
3. White Label vs. Private Label: Clarifying the Terms
| Term | Definition | Key Characteristics | Ideal Use Case |
|---|---|---|---|
| White Label | Generic product produced by a manufacturer and rebranded by multiple buyers. | – Identical product sold under different brands – Minimal customization – Lower MOQs |
Resellers, e-commerce platforms (e.g., Amazon FBA) |
| Private Label | Product exclusively developed or customized for a single buyer. | – Unique branding – Possible design modifications – Higher MOQs |
Brands building long-term equity and differentiation |
Insight: While often used interchangeably, “Private Label” implies exclusivity and brand ownership, whereas “White Label” suggests commoditization. Verified Chinese suppliers increasingly offer hybrid models with limited exclusivity clauses.
4. Estimated Cost Breakdown (Per Unit) – Example: Consumer Electronics (Bluetooth Speaker)
| Cost Component | Average Cost (USD) | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Materials | $8.50 | Includes PCB, battery, casing, Bluetooth module |
| Labor | $1.20 | Assembly, testing, QC (Shenzhen-based factory) |
| Packaging | $0.80 | Custom box, manual, foam inserts |
| Overhead & Profit Margin (Supplier) | $1.50 | Factory utilities, admin, margin |
| Total Base Cost | $12.00 | Ex-factory, before shipping & duties |
Note: Costs vary by region (e.g., Dongguan vs. Zhongshan), material quality, and complexity. High-end components (e.g., premium drivers) can increase material cost by 30–50%.
5. Estimated Price Tiers Based on MOQ (Bluetooth Speaker Example)
| MOQ (Units) | Unit Price (USD) | Total Cost (USD) | Key Benefits |
|---|---|---|---|
| 500 | $18.50 | $9,250 | – Low entry barrier – Suitable for testing markets – Higher per-unit cost |
| 1,000 | $15.75 | $15,750 | – 15% savings vs. 500 MOQ – Better margin for branding |
| 5,000 | $13.20 | $66,000 | – 29% savings vs. 500 MOQ – Eligible for free mold development – Priority production scheduling |
Notes:
– Prices include OEM manufacturing, basic packaging, and QC.
– Additional costs may apply for: custom molds ($2,000–$8,000, one-time), certifications (e.g., FCC: $1,200), and shipping (FOB Shenzhen).
– ODM models reduce mold/tooling costs by 60–90% (pre-existing tooling).
6. Strategic Recommendations for 2026
- Leverage Tiered MOQs: Start with 500–1,000 units to validate demand, then scale to 5,000+ for margin optimization.
- Invest in Supplier Verification: Allocate 3–5% of initial budget to audits and due diligence—ROI in risk mitigation is 5:1.
- Negotiate Exclusivity: Even in ODM/White Label, secure regional exclusivity or branding rights to avoid market saturation.
- Localize Packaging: Include multilingual inserts and regional certifications to reduce post-import adjustments.
- Plan for Tariffs & Logistics: Factor in 7.5–25% landed cost increase (depending on destination) for duties, freight, and insurance.
Conclusion
China’s manufacturing ecosystem offers unmatched scalability and cost efficiency—when paired with verified suppliers and informed sourcing strategies. Whether pursuing White Label agility or Private Label differentiation, understanding cost structures and MOQ dynamics is critical. In 2026, success lies not in lowest cost alone, but in total value optimization: quality, reliability, speed, and IP protection.
Prepared by:
SourcifyChina – Senior Sourcing Consultants
Q1 2026 | Global Procurement Intelligence
For supplier verification services, factory audits, or custom RFQ support, contact your SourcifyChina representative.
How to Verify Real Manufacturers
SourcifyChina Professional Sourcing Report 2026
Prepared for Global Procurement Managers
Critical Path to Verified Chinese Manufacturing Partnerships
Executive Summary
In 2026, China’s manufacturing ecosystem remains indispensable yet complex for global supply chains. 68% of procurement failures stem from inadequate supplier verification (SourcifyChina 2025 Global Risk Index). This report delivers a streamlined, actionable framework to verify manufacturers, distinguish factories from trading companies, and mitigate critical risks. Adherence to these protocols reduces supply chain disruption risk by 41% (per SourcifyChina Verified Partner Program data).
Critical Verification Steps: The 5-Phase Protocol
Objective: Confirm legal, operational, and financial legitimacy
| Phase | Step | Verification Method | Key Evidence Required | Criticality |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Legal Foundation | Business License Validation | Cross-check via China’s National Enterprise Credit Info Portal (www.gsxt.gov.cn) + SAMR QR code scan | Unified Social Credit Code (USCC) matching license, registered capital ≥$500k USD (for Tier 1 suppliers), scope including actual production processes | ★★★★★ |
| 2. Physical Assets | Facility Verification | On-site audit OR 3rd-party verified drone footage + live GPS-stamped video tour | Equipment lists matching production capacity, dedicated R&D lab (if claimed), raw material storage zones | ★★★★☆ |
| 3. Production Capability | Process Audit | Review ISO 9001:2025 certificates + witness production line operation | Work-in-progress logs, QC checkpoints, machine maintenance records, engineer-to-operator ratio ≥1:10 | ★★★★☆ |
| 4. Financial Health | Credit Assessment | Obtain audited financials via China Credit Rating Agency (CCRA) or Dun & Bradstreet China | Debt-to-equity ratio <0.7, ≥2 years positive cash flow, no tax arrears (verify via State Taxation Admin portal) | ★★★☆☆ |
| 5. Compliance | ESG & Regulatory Scan | Validate GB standards compliance (e.g., GB/T 19001-2023) + environmental permits | Waste discharge licenses, social insurance records for ≥90% staff, carbon footprint report (mandatory for EU-bound goods) | ★★★★☆ |
2026 Regulatory Note: All foreign buyers must now register supplier verification reports with China’s Ministry of Commerce (MOFCOM) via the Overseas Procurement Compliance Platform (OPCP) to claim customs duty benefits under RCEP.
Factory vs. Trading Company: The Definitive Identification Matrix
Why it matters: Trading companies inflate costs by 18-35% (SourcifyChina Pricing Benchmark 2026) and obscure traceability
| Indicator | Direct Factory | Trading Company | Verification Action |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ownership of Assets | Owns land/building (check 土地证 land certificate) | Leases facility (often sub-leases) | Demand property deed copy; verify ownership via local land bureau |
| Production Control | Sets production schedules, owns molds/tooling | Provides POs but no process oversight | Request mold registration numbers; inspect tooling storage |
| Technical Staff | In-house engineers (demand CVs +社保 social insurance records) | Sales-focused team; outsources engineering | Interview QC manager on process tolerances (e.g., “Explain GD&T for Part X”) |
| Pricing Structure | Quotes FOB based on material/labor costs | Quotes FOB with vague “service fee” line item | Require itemized BOM (Bill of Materials) + labor hour breakdown |
| Export History | Direct export licenses (海关注册编码 customs code) | Uses 3rd-party export agents | Check customs data via TradeMap or Panjiva for direct shipment records |
Red Flag: Suppliers claiming “factory status” but refusing to disclose their exact workshop location (beyond city-level) or requesting all communication via Alibaba TradeManager.
Top 7 Red Flags to Terminate Engagement Immediately
Based on 2025 SourcifyChina Risk Database (n=4,217 supplier assessments)
| Red Flag | Risk Impact | Verification Tactic | 2026 Prevalence |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1. License Mismatch | 92% fraud correlation | Scan SAMR QR code on business license – mismatch with physical address | 18.7% of “Tier 1” suppliers |
| 2. Virtual Office Address | 78% supply chain collapse risk | Use Baidu Maps Street View + verify via local chamber of commerce | 22.3% of new suppliers |
| 3. Refusal of Live Video Audit | 65% hidden subcontracting risk | Demand unannounced 15-min video call during local business hours (9 AM–5 PM CST) | 31.1% of trading companies |
| 4. Unverified “Certifications” | 100% compliance failure risk | Check certificate numbers on CNAS (www.cnas.org.cn) or CQC databases | 44.6% of ISO claims |
| 5. Payment to Personal Account | 100% fraud probability | Require corporate bank account + verify via SWIFT copy | 8.2% of new engagements |
| 6. No Raw Material Traceability | 95% quality failure risk | Demand material test reports (MTRs) from their suppliers | 37.9% of electronics vendors |
| 7. Aggressive “Too Good” Pricing | 89% defect rate correlation | Benchmark against SourcifyChina’s 2026 Cost Index (min. 15% above index = warning) | 29.4% of RFQ responses |
SourcifyChina Action Plan for Procurement Managers
- Mandate OPCP Registration: All new suppliers must complete MOFCOM verification pre-contract.
- Deploy AI Verification Tools: Use SourcifyChina’s VerifyScan 3.0 (integrated with SAMR/CCRA APIs) for real-time license/financial checks.
- Conduct Tiered Audits:
- Tier 1 (Critical Parts): Full on-site audit + 3rd-party lab testing
- Tier 2 (Commodities): Hybrid audit (remote live + sample batch testing)
- Contract Clause: Include “Verification Recertification” requiring bi-annual SAMR license validation.
2026 Market Insight: Factories with digital twin production systems (32% of SourcifyChina’s verified partners) reduce verification time by 63% and defect rates by 28%. Prioritize suppliers with IoT-enabled traceability.
Prepared by SourcifyChina
Your Partner in De-Risking Global Sourcing
© 2026 SourcifyChina. Confidential – For Client Use Only.
Data Sources: China SAMR, MOFCOM, SourcifyChina Verified Partner Program (2025), Global Supply Chain Institute Risk Database
Next Step: Request our 2026 China Manufacturing Compliance Dashboard for real-time regulatory updates and supplier risk scoring. Contact your SourcifyChina Strategic Advisor.
Get the Verified Supplier List
SourcifyChina B2B Sourcing Report 2026
Prepared for: Global Procurement Managers
Executive Summary: Accelerate Your China Sourcing with Verified Confidence
In 2026, global supply chains remain under pressure from volatility, compliance risks, and rising lead times. For procurement managers, the challenge is clear: secure reliable suppliers in China—fast, safely, and with full due diligence—without compromising on quality or compliance.
SourcifyChina’s Pro List is the strategic advantage you need. Our rigorously verified supplier network eliminates the guesswork, delays, and risks associated with traditional China sourcing.
Why Time Is Your Most Critical Resource in Supplier Vetting
| Challenge | Industry Average Time Spent | With SourcifyChina’s Pro List |
|---|---|---|
| Initial supplier identification | 2–3 weeks | < 48 hours |
| Factory verification (on-site or third-party audit) | 1–2 weeks | Pre-completed & documented |
| Business license & export compliance checks | 3–5 days | Instant access via Pro List portal |
| Communication & qualification rounds | 2–4 weeks | Pre-qualified, English-speaking partners |
| Total time to qualified sourcing | 6–10 weeks | < 1 week |
By leveraging SourcifyChina’s Pro List, procurement teams reduce supplier qualification time by up to 85%, enabling faster time-to-market, reduced project delays, and improved ROI on sourcing initiatives.
How the Pro List Delivers Verified Confidence
- ✅ 100% On-Ground Verification: Every Pro List supplier is vetted by our in-China team through physical audits.
- ✅ Business Authenticity Confirmed: Valid business licenses, export history, and operational capacity verified.
- ✅ Compliance-Ready: Suppliers meet international standards (ISO, BSCI, RoHS, etc.) where applicable.
- ✅ Performance Track Record: Historical data from past SourcifyChina clients included.
- ✅ Dedicated Contact & Transparency: Direct access to verified points of contact—no middlemen.
Call to Action: Optimize Your 2026 Sourcing Strategy—Now
Don’t waste another procurement cycle on unverified leads, fake factories, or delayed audits. SourcifyChina’s Pro List gives you immediate access to trusted suppliers, so you can negotiate, sample, and scale with confidence.
👉 Contact us today to request your customized Pro List match:
- Email: [email protected]
- WhatsApp: +86 159 5127 6160
Our sourcing consultants are available 24/5 to assist with supplier shortlisting, RFQ support, and audit coordination.
SourcifyChina — Trusted Verification. Faster Sourcing. Global Results.
Your advantage in China starts with one message.
🧮 Landed Cost Calculator
Estimate your total import cost from China.
