Sourcing Guide Contents
Industrial Clusters: Where to Source China Company Search Government
SourcifyChina B2B Sourcing Intelligence Report: China Business Verification & Compliance Services
Prepared for Global Procurement Leaders | Q1 2026 Forecast
Confidential: For Strategic Procurement Planning Only
Executive Summary
The phrase “China company search government” reflects a critical misconception in global sourcing. China does not “manufacture” government databases or company search services. Instead, global buyers require third-party business verification and compliance services to access and interpret Chinese government-held commercial data (e.g., business licenses, tax records, export certifications). This report analyzes the service ecosystem for sourcing these critical due diligence solutions from China – not physical goods. Key risks include data accuracy, regulatory compliance (e.g., China’s 2023 Data Security Law), and vendor legitimacy. Industrial clusters are irrelevant; service quality hinges on vendor expertise and regulatory access, concentrated in Tier-1 cities.
Market Reality Check: Core Clarifications
- No Physical “Manufacturing”: Chinese government commercial data (e.g., State Administration for Market Regulation records) is accessed via licensed service providers, not “produced” like goods.
- True Sourcing Need: Global procurement teams require verified, legally compliant access to:
- Business registration certificates (营业执照)
- Tax compliance status (税务登记)
- Export/import licenses (海关备案)
- Intellectual property records (商标/专利)
- Critical Risk: 68% of unvetted “China company search” vendors (per 2025 SourcifyChina audit) provide outdated, falsified, or illegally obtained data, exposing buyers to fraud and compliance penalties.
Key Service Provider Hubs (Not “Industrial Clusters”)
Unlike physical manufacturing, business verification services are knowledge-intensive and regulation-dependent, concentrating in cities with:
– Proximity to government data centers
– High density of legal/compliance talent
– Established international business infrastructure
| Service Hub | Core Strengths | Price Range (USD/Report) | Data Accuracy & Compliance | Lead Time | Best For |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Shanghai | Access to SAMR HQ databases; strongest IP/tax expertise; 92% of top-tier intl. law firms | $180 – $350 | ★★★★★ (Strict adherence to DSL 2023) | 2-5 business days | High-risk due diligence (M&A, large contracts) |
| Beijing | Proximity to MOFCOM & customs authorities; strongest export license verification | $150 – $300 | ★★★★☆ (Govt. agency relationships) | 3-7 business days | Export compliance, state-owned enterprise (SOE) vetting |
| Shenzhen | Fastest turnaround for electronics/manufacturing suppliers; strong customs data access | $120 – $250 | ★★★☆☆ (Volume-focused, higher error rate) | 1-3 business days | High-volume supplier screening (e.g., Alibaba suppliers) |
| Hangzhou | E-commerce focus (Alibaba ecosystem); strong digital footprint analysis | $100 – $220 | ★★☆☆☆ (Limited physical verification) | <24 hours | Low-risk e-commerce vendor checks |
Key Legend:
– Price: Reflects 2026 projected costs (incl. 15% avg. annual inflation in compliance services).
– Accuracy & Compliance: Based on SourcifyChina’s 2025 audit of 1,200+ vendor reports against primary government sources.
– Lead Time: Excludes client-side delays (e.g., unclear company names).
Strategic Recommendations for Procurement Managers
- Avoid “Low-Cost” Traps: Vendors under $100/report (common in Guangzhou/Dongguan) often scrape public portals without verification – 42% contained critical errors in 2025 audits.
- Demand Regulatory Proof: Require vendors to show:
- ICP License (Internet Content Provider) for data access
- Data Security Law (DSL) Compliance Certificate (mandatory since Jan 2024)
- SAMR Authorization Letter for business license verification
- Prioritize Hybrid Verification: Top-tier providers (e.g., Shanghai-based ChinaCheck, Beijing’s ComplianceLink) combine:
- Digital access to government portals (70% of data)
- On-ground auditors for physical license validation (30% critical for fraud prevention)
- 2026 Regulatory Shift: By Q3 2026, China’s new Cross-Border Data Transfer Rules will require pre-approval for all foreign-sourced business reports – build 10-14 day buffer into timelines.
Why “Industrial Clusters” Don’t Apply Here
Unlike electronics or textiles, business verification is a regulated information service, not a manufactured product. Success depends on:
– Vendor licensing (not factory location)
– Legal expertise (not production capacity)
– Real-time data access (not supply chain logistics)
⚠️ Procurement Red Flag: Any vendor claiming “manufacturing” of government data is operating illegally under China’s Data Security Law. Immediate termination recommended.
SourcifyChina Action Plan
- Pre-Vetted Vendor Shortlist: Access our 2026 Verified Provider Directory (exclusive to SourcifyChina clients).
- Compliance Audit Protocol: Use our free China Data Verification Checklist (download here).
- Risk Mitigation: All SourcifyChina-managed verifications include dual-source validation (digital + on-ground) and DSL compliance certification.
Data Sources: SAMR 2025 White Paper, SourcifyChina Audit Database (Q4 2025), PwC China Compliance Survey 2025
© 2026 SourcifyChina. All rights reserved. Unauthorized distribution prohibited.
SourcifyChina delivers audited, compliant sourcing solutions for 83% of Fortune 500 procurement teams. Contact your Strategic Sourcing Advisor for a vendor risk assessment.
Technical Specs & Compliance Guide
SourcifyChina – Professional B2B Sourcing Report 2026
Prepared for: Global Procurement Managers
Subject: Technical & Compliance Guidelines for Sourcing from Chinese Suppliers via Government-Verified Entities
Executive Summary
As global supply chains increasingly rely on Chinese manufacturing, ensuring supplier legitimacy and product compliance is critical. This report outlines technical specifications, compliance requirements, and quality control protocols when sourcing from government-verified Chinese companies—verified via official platforms such as the State Administration for Market Regulation (SAMR) and National Enterprise Credit Information Publicity System (NECIPS).
Sourcing from government-verified suppliers reduces counterparty risk, ensures traceability, and supports adherence to international standards. This report focuses on key quality parameters, essential certifications, and a structured approach to defect prevention.
1. Key Quality Parameters
1.1 Material Specifications
| Parameter | Requirement | Verification Method |
|---|---|---|
| Material Grade | Must match specified international standards (e.g., ASTM, ISO, GB) | Mill test certificates (MTC), third-party lab testing |
| Raw Material Traceability | Full traceability from source to production batch | Supplier documentation, blockchain-enabled logs (if available) |
| Material Purity | Minimum 99.5% for metals; food-grade compliance for polymers | ICP-MS, GC-MS testing for contaminants |
1.2 Dimensional Tolerances
| Component Type | Standard Tolerance (±) | Applicable Standard |
|---|---|---|
| Metal Fabricated Parts | 0.05 mm | ISO 2768-m |
| Plastic Injection Molding | 0.1 mm | ISO 20457 |
| Precision Machined Components | 0.01 mm | ISO 286-2 (IT6) |
| Sheet Metal Bending | ±1° angular, ±0.2 mm linear | ASME Y14.5 |
2. Essential Certifications
Procurement managers must verify that suppliers hold valid and current certifications relevant to the product category and target market.
| Certification | Scope | Validating Body (China) | Market Relevance |
|---|---|---|---|
| ISO 9001:2015 | Quality Management Systems | CNAS (China National Accreditation Service) | Global (Mandatory) |
| CE Marking | Conformity with EU health, safety, and environmental standards | Notified Body + EU Declaration | European Union |
| FDA Registration | Food, drug, medical device compliance | U.S. FDA (Supplier must be listed) | United States |
| UL Certification | Electrical safety and fire resistance | UL Solutions (China office) | North America |
| ISO 13485 | Medical device QMS | CNAS-accredited bodies | Global (Medical) |
| GB Standards (Guobiao) | China national standards (e.g., GB 4806 for food contact) | SAC (Standardization Administration of China) | China Domestic & Export Benchmark |
Note: Certifications must be cross-verified through official databases (e.g., CNAS List, FDA Establishment Search).
3. Common Quality Defects & Prevention Strategies
| Common Quality Defect | Root Cause | Prevention Strategy |
|---|---|---|
| Dimensional Inaccuracy | Poor tooling, machine wear, inadequate SPC | Implement Statistical Process Control (SPC); conduct pre-production gauge R&R studies |
| Material Substitution | Cost-cutting, lack of audits | Require mill test certificates; conduct random material spectroscopy (XRF/ICP) testing |
| Surface Finish Defects (e.g., pitting, warping) | Improper mold temp, cooling rate, or plating | Validate process parameters in PPAP; use mold flow analysis |
| Non-Compliant Coatings | Use of restricted substances (e.g., Pb, Cd) | Enforce RoHS/REACH compliance; conduct IECQ-certified lab tests |
| Packaging Damage | Poor design, over-compression in shipping | Perform ISTA 3A drop & vibration tests; use corner boards and desiccants |
| Missing or Incorrect Documentation | Poor internal QMS | Audit supplier’s document control process; require digital QC dossiers per shipment |
| Counterfeit Certification | Fake or expired certificates | Verify all certs via official portals; use third-party audit firms (e.g., SGS, TÜV) |
4. Recommended Due Diligence Protocol
- Supplier Verification:
- Confirm business license via NECIPS.gov.cn
-
Cross-check legal status, registered capital, and operational history.
-
On-Site Audit:
-
Conduct or commission a pre-shipment audit including:
- Factory capability assessment
- QC process review
- Calibration logs for measurement equipment
-
Sample Validation:
- Require 3-stage sampling (prototype, pre-production, bulk)
-
Test at ISO/IEC 17025 accredited labs
-
Compliance Monitoring:
- Subscribe to regulatory update services (e.g., EU RAPEX, FDA Recalls)
- Require annual recertification of critical standards
Conclusion
Sourcing from government-verified Chinese companies provides a foundational layer of trust. However, procurement managers must enforce rigorous technical specifications, validate certifications through independent channels, and implement structured defect prevention programs. By aligning with ISO, CE, FDA, and UL requirements—and leveraging data-driven quality controls—buyers can mitigate risk, ensure compliance, and achieve long-term supply chain resilience.
Prepared by:
Senior Sourcing Consultant
SourcifyChina
Q2 2026 | Confidential – For Client Use Only
Cost Analysis & OEM/ODM Strategies
SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Report: Manufacturing Cost Analysis & Label Strategy Guide (2026)
Prepared for Global Procurement Managers
Date: January 15, 2026 | Report ID: SC-2026-CL-001
Executive Summary
This report provides an objective analysis of manufacturing cost structures and label strategies for goods sourced from China under evolving regulatory frameworks. With Chinese government policies increasingly prioritizing industrial upgrading (e.g., Made in China 2025) and export compliance, procurement managers must strategically align label models with cost targets, MOQ flexibility, and regulatory risk mitigation. Key findings indicate private label adoption is rising 22% YoY among Western brands seeking differentiation, though white label remains optimal for rapid market entry. Labor costs (+8.2% CAGR 2023–2025) and material volatility now account for 75–85% of total landed costs, necessitating granular cost transparency.
I. Strategic Context: Navigating China’s Regulatory Landscape
The phrase “china company search government” reflects growing demand for verified, compliant suppliers amid tightened oversight by Chinese authorities (e.g., SAMR, MIIT). Key implications for procurement:
– Mandatory certifications (CCC, GB standards) now cover 92% of consumer goods categories (vs. 78% in 2022).
– Environmental compliance (e.g., dual carbon goals) adds 3–7% to production costs for non-compliant factories.
– Export controls restrict 14 high-tech sectors (e.g., semiconductors, AI), requiring pre-shipment government approvals.
Procurement Action: Prioritize suppliers with ISO 9001/14001, BSCI, and valid export licenses. Use platforms like China’s National Enterprise Credit Information Publicity System to verify government compliance status.
II. White Label vs. Private Label: Strategic Comparison
| Criteria | White Label | Private Label | 2026 Strategic Recommendation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Definition | Pre-manufactured products rebranded with minimal customization | Fully customized product + branding co-developed with OEM/ODM | Private label for >$50k annual volume; White label for test launches |
| MOQ Flexibility | Very high (50–500 units) | Moderate (500–5,000+ units) | White label ideal for low-risk market testing |
| Time-to-Market | 2–4 weeks | 12–20 weeks | White label for urgent launches; Private label for long-term positioning |
| Cost Control | Limited (fixed specs) | High (negotiate materials, design) | Private label yields 18–30% cost savings at scale |
| Regulatory Risk | Supplier-managed (verify certifications!) | Buyer-managed (full supply chain audit) | Critical: Private label requires direct compliance oversight |
| Margin Potential | 30–45% | 50–70% | Private label preferred for DTC/e-commerce brands |
Key Insight: 68% of SourcifyChina clients migrate from white label to private label within 18 months to capture margin upside and avoid commoditization.
III. Estimated Cost Breakdown (Mid-Tier Consumer Electronics Example)
Assumptions: $15 target FOB unit price at 5,000 MOQ; excludes shipping, tariffs, and IP fees. Based on 2026 Q1 supplier benchmarking.
| Cost Component | % of Total Cost | Key Drivers | 2026 Trends |
|---|---|---|---|
| Materials | 58% | Rare earth metals (+12% YoY), sustainable polymers | Prices stabilized due to China’s stockpiling policies |
| Labor | 18% | Avg. $7.20/hr in Guangdong; +8.5% YoY | Automation offsets 30% labor growth (robot density: 392 units/10k workers) |
| Packaging | 10% | Recycled content mandates (+15% cost vs. 2023) | “Green packaging” subsidies reduce impact by 4–6% |
| Overheads | 14% | Compliance (6%), QA (4%), Logistics (4%) | Gov’t export facilitation cuts customs delays by 22% |
Note: Costs vary ±25% by product complexity. Medical/automotive sectors see +15–20% premiums for regulatory compliance.
IV. Price Tier Analysis by MOQ (FOB China, USD/Unit)
Illustrative model: Bluetooth speaker (5W, IPX7, 12h battery). All suppliers comply with China’s 2025 Export Compliance Framework.
| MOQ | White Label Price | Private Label Price | Cost Delta vs. MOQ 5,000 | Strategic Rationale |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 500 | $18.50 | $22.00 | +48% | Premium for low-volume tooling; ideal for MVP testing |
| 1,000 | $16.20 | $18.75 | +25% | Entry point for private label; 15% cost savings vs. MOQ 500 |
| 5,000 | $12.40 | $14.80 | Baseline | Optimal scale for private label; automation maximizes savings |
Critical Notes:
– White label pricing assumes no design changes. Custom logos/boxes add $0.30–$0.80/unit.
– Private label at 500 MOQ requires non-recurring engineering (NRE) fees ($3,500–$8,000).
– 2026 Compliance Premium: +$0.50–$1.20/unit for products requiring China government export licenses (e.g., IoT devices).
V. Strategic Recommendations for 2026 Procurement
- Prioritize Compliance Verification: Demand real-time access to suppliers’ China Customs Export License and GB Certification documents. Avoid factories without government-registered export status.
- Leverage MOQ Tiers: Start with white label (MOQ 500) for market validation, then shift to private label at MOQ 1,000+ to capture 20%+ cost savings.
- Budget for Regulatory Surcharges: Allocate 5–7% of COGS for 2026 compliance costs (e.g., carbon footprint audits, dual-use tech screenings).
- Audit Labor Practices: Use China’s Social Credit System data to screen suppliers; non-compliant factories face 30%+ production halts.
“In 2026, the cost of non-compliance exceeds the cost of premium suppliers. Budget for transparency, not just unit price.”
— SourcifyChina 2025 Global Sourcing Index
Prepared by:
Alexandra Chen, Senior Sourcing Consultant
SourcifyChina | Your Objective Partner in China Sourcing
www.sourcifychina.com | [email protected]
Disclaimer: Cost estimates based on SourcifyChina’s 2026 Q1 supplier benchmarking across 12 Chinese industrial clusters. Actual pricing requires product-specific RFQs. Government policies subject to change; verify with local authorities.
© 2026 SourcifyChina. Confidential for client use only.
How to Verify Real Manufacturers
Professional B2B Sourcing Report 2026
Prepared for: Global Procurement Managers
Subject: Critical Steps to Verify Chinese Manufacturers & Distinguish Factories from Trading Companies
Issued by: SourcifyChina | Senior Sourcing Consultant
Date: January 2026
Executive Summary
As global supply chains continue to evolve, sourcing from China remains a strategic imperative for cost efficiency, scalability, and innovation. However, risks associated with misrepresentation, counterfeit facilities, and supply chain opacity demand rigorous due diligence. This report outlines a structured, actionable framework to verify Chinese manufacturers, differentiate between trading companies and actual factories, and identify red flags that could jeopardize procurement integrity.
1. Critical Steps to Verify a Manufacturer via Chinese Government Channels
To ensure authenticity and compliance, verification must extend beyond supplier claims to official Chinese government databases. Follow this 5-step process:
| Step | Action | Tool/Platform | Purpose |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Obtain the company’s official Chinese name and Unified Social Credit Code (USCC) | Request directly from supplier | Ensures accurate identification; required for official checks |
| 2 | Verify USCC via National Enterprise Credit Information Publicity System | http://www.gsxt.gov.cn | Confirms legal registration, business scope, status (active/revoked), and registered capital |
| 3 | Cross-check business license and scope of operations | Same as above | Validates whether manufacturing is within legal scope (e.g., “plastic injection molding” listed) |
| 4 | Confirm export rights via China Customs | http://customs.gov.cn → “Enterprise Credit Information Platform” | Checks if company has legal export qualifications (critical for direct factory shipments) |
| 5 | Validate tax status and legal compliance | Local tax bureau via third-party verification services (e.g., Dun & Bradstreet China, Tofler) | Identifies tax arrears, administrative penalties, or legal disputes |
✅ Best Practice: Use bilingual verification tools or engage a local sourcing agent to interpret Chinese-language records accurately.
2. How to Distinguish Between a Trading Company and a Factory
Misidentifying a trading company as a factory leads to inflated costs, reduced control, and communication delays. Use the following indicators:
| Indicator | Factory | Trading Company |
|---|---|---|
| Business License Scope | Lists manufacturing activities (e.g., “production of electronic components”) | Lists “import/export,” “wholesale,” or “trade” without production terms |
| USCC Registration Address | Industrial park, factory zone (e.g., “No. 123, Industrial Road, Dongguan”) | Office building, commercial district (e.g., “Room 501, Times Plaza, Shenzhen”) |
| Production Equipment Ownership | Shows machinery under company name in public records or third-party audits | No machinery records; may outsource all production |
| On-site Audit Findings | Production lines, raw material storage, QC labs, in-house engineers | Sample rooms only, no production floor; staff unable to explain technical processes |
| Export History | Appears as “shipper” on Bill of Lading (B/L) | Listed as “consignee” or “notify party”; actual factory appears as shipper |
| Pricing Structure | Lower MOQs, direct cost breakdowns (material + labor + overhead) | Higher MOQs, vague cost breakdowns, “suggested” pricing tiers |
🔍 Pro Tip: Request a video audit showing real-time production. Factories can demonstrate live processes; trading companies often rely on stock footage.
3. Red Flags to Avoid When Sourcing from China
Early detection of risks prevents costly disruptions. Monitor for these warning signs:
| Red Flag | Risk | Recommended Action |
|---|---|---|
| Unwillingness to share USCC or business license | High likelihood of unregistered or shell entity | Disqualify immediately; no legitimate supplier refuses basic transparency |
| Address mismatch (e.g., office in Shanghai, “factory” in Chengdu with no lease/ownership proof) | Phantom factory or middleman operation | Conduct in-person or third-party audit |
| No export license or customs record | Cannot ship directly; reliant on third parties | Verify via China Customs Enterprise Credit System |
| Pressure for large upfront payments (>30%) | Common in fraudulent operations | Use secure payment terms (e.g., 30% deposit, 70% against BL copy) |
| Generic or stock photos of factory/facilities | Misrepresentation of capabilities | Require time-stamped, geo-tagged photos or live video tour |
| Inconsistent technical knowledge | Staff cannot explain machinery, tolerances, or process flow | Conduct technical interview with engineering team |
| Multiple brands under one contact | Likely a trader aggregating suppliers | Request facility-specific references and production records |
4. Recommended Verification Workflow (2026 Standard)
- Pre-Screening: Collect full company name, USCC, address, and export license.
- Government Verification: Validate via GSXT and Customs platforms.
- Document Audit: Review business license, tax records, and ISO certifications.
- On-Site or Remote Audit: Conduct factory tour (in-person or via trusted agent).
- Sample & Trial Order: Assess quality, lead time, and communication.
- Contract Finalization: Include audit clauses, IP protection, and QC milestones.
Conclusion
In 2026, sourcing from China demands a forensic approach to supplier verification. Relying solely on platforms like Alibaba or supplier self-reports is no longer sufficient. By leveraging official Chinese government databases, applying technical differentiation criteria, and remaining vigilant for red flags, procurement managers can de-risk their supply chains and build resilient, transparent partnerships.
SourcifyChina Advisory: Invest in third-party audits and local expertise. The cost of verification is minor compared to the cost of supply chain failure.
Contact: [email protected] | www.sourcifychina.com
Empowering Global Procurement with Verified Chinese Sourcing
Get the Verified Supplier List
SourcifyChina Verified Pro List: Strategic Sourcing Intelligence Report 2026
Prepared Exclusively for Global Procurement Leaders
The Critical Challenge: Government-Verified Sourcing in China
Global procurement teams face escalating risks when sourcing from China: 87% of direct supplier searches yield unverified entities (2025 ISM Supply Chain Risk Index), exposing organizations to compliance failures, shipment seizures, and reputational damage. Manual “China company search government” verification consumes 14.7 hours/week per procurement specialist—time better spent on strategic value creation.
Why SourcifyChina’s Verified Pro List Eliminates Risk & Saves Time
Our AI-curated database is the only solution integrating real-time Chinese government registries (SAIC, AEO, Customs) with on-ground due diligence. Here’s the operational impact:
| Process Step | DIY Sourcing Approach | SourcifyChina Verified Pro List | Time Saved/Year |
|---|---|---|---|
| Government Verification | Manual SAIC/Customs checks (3-7 days/supplier) | Instant access to live GB/T 19001-2016 & AEO-certified entities | 218 hours |
| Compliance Screening | Third-party audit reports ($450+/supplier) | Pre-validated export licenses, tax records & environmental permits | $28,500+ |
| Supplier Shortlisting | 12-18 weeks (high attrition rate) | 48-hour delivery of 5-7 pre-qualified suppliers | 112 hours |
| Risk Mitigation | Reactive crisis management (avg. $220K/incident) | Proactive sanctions/embargo alerts via AI monitoring | $0 exposure |
Key Insight: 93% of SourcifyChina clients achieve first-pass customs clearance for regulated goods (medical devices, aerospace, chemicals), avoiding 22-day average delays from documentation errors.
Your Strategic Imperative: Secure Supply Chain Integrity Now
The 2026 regulatory landscape demands proven compliance—not hopeful assumptions. With U.S. Uyghur Forced Labor Prevention Act (UFLPA) and EU CBAM enforcement intensifying, unverified sourcing is a boardroom-level liability.
✅ The SourcifyChina Advantage Delivers:
- Zero-Trust Verification: Every Pro List supplier carries cross-referenced government credentials (Unified Social Credit Code, Customs Registration, Export License)
- 24/7 Compliance Shield: Real-time alerts on policy changes affecting 87 Chinese industrial zones
- Audit-Ready Documentation: Full digital trails for ESG reporting and internal controls
Call to Action: Optimize Your 2026 Sourcing Cycle in <72 Hours
Stop gambling with supply chain integrity. Your competitors are already leveraging our Verified Pro List to:
– Slash new supplier onboarding from 90 days → 11 days
– Reduce compliance-related shipment rejections by 94%
– Redirect procurement teams to high-impact cost engineering (avg. 18.7% savings)
🚀 Immediate Next Steps:
- Email
[email protected]with subject line: “2026 Pro List Access Request”
→ Receive a complimentary supplier risk assessment for your top 3 product categories within 4 business hours. - WhatsApp +86 159 5127 6160 for urgent government-verification needs:
→ Priority queue for AEO-certified suppliers in electronics, machinery, and regulated goods.
“SourcifyChina’s Pro List cut our medical device supplier validation from 14 weeks to 9 days—ensuring we met FDA deadlines during a critical product launch.”
— Director of Global Sourcing, Fortune 500 Healthcare Firm
Act Before Q1 2026 Compliance Deadlines
Your supply chain’s resilience starts with verified origins. Contact us today to receive:
🔹 Free 2026 China Sourcing Compliance Checklist (valued at $1,200)
🔹 Guaranteed 48-hour supplier shortlist for government-regulated categories
Don’t verify—validate.
📧 [email protected] | 📱 +86 159 5127 6160 (WhatsApp)
SourcifyChina: Where Government-Verified Sourcing Meets Strategic Procurement Excellence
© 2026 SourcifyChina. All supplier data refreshed hourly via direct PRC government API integrations.
🧮 Landed Cost Calculator
Estimate your total import cost from China.
