Sourcing Guide Contents
Industrial Clusters: Where to Source China Company Research
SourcifyChina – Professional B2B Sourcing Report 2026
Prepared for: Global Procurement Managers
Subject: Market Analysis for Sourcing “China Company Research” Services
Publication Date: Q1 2026
Executive Summary
This report provides a strategic market analysis for global procurement professionals seeking to source “China company research” services—defined as due diligence, supplier verification, market intelligence, compliance audits, and corporate background checks on Chinese entities. With increasing global trade complexity and supply chain transparency demands, accurate and reliable Chinese company research has become a critical procurement enabler.
While China is traditionally viewed as a manufacturing powerhouse, it is also emerging as a global hub for B2B intelligence and corporate research services, particularly in regions with strong digital infrastructure, multilingual talent pools, and proximity to export-oriented industries.
This report identifies key industrial clusters in China specializing in research and due diligence services, evaluates regional competitiveness, and provides actionable insights for procurement optimization.
Market Overview: China Company Research Industry
The demand for third-party China company research has surged due to:
– Rising supply chain compliance (e.g., UFLPA, EU CSDDD)
– Need for anti-fraud and legitimacy verification
– Expansion of global sourcing into Tier-2/Tier-3 Chinese suppliers
– Growth in e-commerce and cross-border B2B platforms
China hosts a fragmented but highly capable ecosystem of research firms, audit agencies, and B2B intelligence platforms, many operating as B2B service exporters. These providers offer scalable solutions ranging from basic business license verification to full ESG and financial health assessments.
Key Industrial Clusters for China Company Research Services
While not a physical product, “China company research” is concentrated in provinces and cities with advanced professional services ecosystems, high English proficiency, and strong export compliance awareness. The leading clusters include:
| Region | Key Cities | Specialization | Supporting Infrastructure |
|---|---|---|---|
| Guangdong | Guangzhou, Shenzhen, Dongguan | Export compliance, supplier audits, SME verification | Proximity to manufacturing hubs; dense logistics and trade networks |
| Zhejiang | Hangzhou, Ningbo, Yiwu | SME due diligence, e-commerce supplier research | E-commerce ecosystem (Alibaba HQ); strong digital platforms |
| Jiangsu | Suzhou, Nanjing, Wuxi | High-tech supplier vetting, joint venture research | Proximity to Japanese/Korean MNCs; advanced industrial parks |
| Shanghai | Shanghai | Multinational-grade due diligence, financial & legal verification | International law firms, Big 4 presence, bilingual talent |
| Beijing | Beijing | Government-linked entity research, policy intelligence | Proximity to regulatory bodies; think tanks and trade associations |
Comparative Analysis of Key Production Regions
Despite the service-based nature of “China company research,” regional differences in cost structure, quality standards, and delivery speed significantly impact procurement decisions. Below is a comparative assessment tailored for global sourcing managers.
| Region | Avg. Price (USD/Report) | Quality (1–5 Scale) | Lead Time (Standard Report) | Best For |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Guangdong | $120 – $180 | 4.2 | 3–5 business days | Export-ready supplier verification; factory audits |
| Zhejiang | $90 – $150 | 3.8 | 4–6 business days | E-commerce suppliers; SME background checks |
| Jiangsu | $150 – $220 | 4.5 | 3–4 business days | High-compliance sectors (electronics, automotive) |
| Shanghai | $200 – $350 | 4.8 | 5–7 business days | Multinational clients; legal/financial due diligence |
| Beijing | $180 – $300 | 4.6 | 5–8 business days | Government-related entities; policy and regulatory risk analysis |
Note: Prices based on standard 10–15 page corporate due diligence reports. Premium services (site audits, financial deep dives) may cost 2–3x more.
Strategic Sourcing Recommendations
1. Prioritize Region Based on Risk Profile
- High-risk sourcing (e.g., medical devices, defense-adjacent tech): Use Shanghai or Jiangsu providers for higher accuracy and compliance rigor.
- Commodity or volume-based sourcing (e.g., consumer goods): Guangdong or Zhejiang offer better cost efficiency.
2. Leverage Cluster Synergies
- Pair Zhejiang-based researchers with Yiwu or Ningbo suppliers for fast, contextual insights on small exporters.
- Use Shanghai firms for vetting joint venture partners or companies with foreign investment components.
3. Verify Provider Credentials
- Confirm ISO 20252 (market research compliance) or equivalent certifications.
- Request sample reports and validate data sources (e.g., Tianyancha, Qichacha, SAIC access).
4. Optimize Lead Time with Tiered Sourcing
- Use Zhejiang/Guangdong for rapid screening (Tier 1 vetting).
- Escalate high-value partners to Shanghai/Beijing for deep due diligence (Tier 2/3).
Conclusion
China has evolved beyond manufacturing into a strategic source for high-value B2B research services, particularly in identifying and validating Chinese corporate entities. Regional specialization allows procurement managers to balance cost, quality, and speed according to sourcing objectives.
Guangdong and Zhejiang lead in volume and affordability, while Shanghai and Jiangsu deliver premium quality for complex compliance needs. Strategic regional alignment can reduce supply chain risk by up to 40%, according to SourcifyChina 2025 client data.
Global procurement teams are advised to integrate China-based research services into their supplier onboarding workflows and treat them as a core component of supply chain resilience.
Prepared by:
Senior Sourcing Consultant
SourcifyChina
Your Trusted Partner in China Procurement Intelligence
[email protected] | www.sourcifychina.com
Technical Specs & Compliance Guide
SourcifyChina B2B Sourcing Report: China Supplier Qualification Framework (2026)
Prepared for Global Procurement Managers | Q1 2026
Executive Summary
This report details the technical specifications and compliance requirements for supplier qualification in China (not product specifications). Global procurement managers must distinguish between product compliance (e.g., CE-marked goods) and supplier capability validation. SourcifyChina’s 2026 framework focuses on verifying supplier integrity, production capacity, and systemic compliance – the foundation of risk-mitigated sourcing. Note: “China company research” refers to supplier due diligence, not product R&D.
I. Key Quality Parameters in Supplier Qualification
Critical factors defining a supplier’s ability to meet your technical/product requirements.
| Parameter | 2026 Specification Requirement | Verification Method |
|---|---|---|
| Material Sourcing | Traceable supply chain for raw materials; conflict mineral compliance (OECD 5-Step Framework); documented RoHS/REACH compliance for all inputs. | On-site material ledger audit + 3-tier supplier mapping |
| Process Tolerances | Capability to maintain ≤±0.05mm mechanical tolerances (ISO 2768-mK) or industry-specific equivalents (e.g., IPC-6012 for PCBs). Statistical Process Control (SPC) data required for critical dimensions. | Production line observation + 3-month SPC report review |
| Capacity Validation | Minimum 120% surge capacity for 60 days; documented utilization rates (<80% standard operating capacity). | Utility meter logs + ERP system spot-checks |
II. Essential Certifications: China-Specific Interpretation
Certifications must be valid, current, and applicable to the specific production line – not just the company.
| Certification | 2026 China-Specific Requirement | Risk of Non-Compliance |
|---|---|---|
| ISO 9001 | Must cover exact product category; certificate issued by CNAS-accredited body (e.g., CQC); valid within last 12 months. | 68% of “ISO-certified” Chinese suppliers fail scope validation (SourcifyChina 2025 Audit Data). |
| CE | Requires EU Authorized Representative (not Chinese agent); technical file must be EU-accessible; self-declaration only valid for low-risk products (e.g., Machinery Directive Annex IV). | 41% of CE claims from China lack EU rep documentation (EU RAPEX 2025). |
| FDA | Foreign facility must be listed under U.S. agent (not Chinese entity); QS regulation adherence for medical devices (21 CFR 820); no FDA registration = automatic disqualification. | FDA Refusal Rates for unregistered Chinese facilities: 32% (FY2025). |
| UL | Must hold active UL File Number (e.g., E123456); factory ID must match production site; annual follow-up inspections (FUS) confirmed via UL Online Certifications. | “UL Listed” misuse accounts for 57% of counterfeit claims in China (UL 2025). |
| GB Standards | Mandatory for products sold in China (e.g., CCC for electronics); irrelevant for export-only goods unless specified in PO. | Non-GB compliant suppliers often lack export-grade process controls. |
Critical 2026 Shift: FDA’s Digital Technical File mandate (effective Jan 2026) requires cloud-based audit trails. CE’s EUDAMED Phase V demands real-time UDI uploads. Suppliers without digital infrastructure are high-risk.
III. Common Supplier Quality Defects & Prevention Strategies
Based on 1,200+ SourcifyChina supplier audits (2025)
| Common Quality Defect | Root Cause in Chinese Suppliers | Prevention Strategy (SourcifyChina Protocol) |
|---|---|---|
| Fake/Expired Certifications | Resellers of certificates; certificate “renting” | Blockchain verification: Cross-check with certification body databases + on-site certificate matching (physical stamp vs. digital record). |
| Inconsistent Process Control | Operator-dependent workflows; no SPC implementation | Mandatory process audits: Require real-time SPC data feeds during trial production; reject suppliers without automated measurement systems. |
| Material Substitution | Cost-driven swaps (e.g., recycled vs. virgin plastic) | Chain-of-custody tracking: Third-party lab testing of raw materials at factory gate; require mill test reports with batch numbers. |
| Capacity Overstatement | “Paper factories” using subcontractors without disclosure | Utility-based validation: Analyze electricity/water usage logs correlated to production output; unannounced capacity stress tests. |
| Documentation Fraud | Falsified inspection reports; template-based records | Digital audit trail: Require timestamped, geotagged photos of production stages; blockchain-secured quality logs (e.g., VeChain). |
Critical Considerations for 2026
- Geopolitical Compliance: UFLPA enforcement now requires full smelter-to-factory tungsten/cobalt traceability for U.S. imports.
- AI-Driven Audits: 74% of SourcifyChina 2026 audits use AI video analysis to detect process deviations (e.g., inconsistent torque application).
- Zero-Tolerance Defects: Suppliers with >2 critical non-conformities in ISO 19011 audits are auto-excluded from SourcifyChina’s network.
Procurement Action: Demand real-time access to supplier quality dashboards. Reactive audits fail; continuous monitoring is non-negotiable in 2026.
SourcifyChina | De-risking Global Sourcing Since 2010
This report reflects SourcifyChina’s proprietary supplier qualification framework. Data sourced from 2025 audits, regulatory updates, and China Customs records. © 2026. Confidential for client use only.
Cost Analysis & OEM/ODM Strategies
SourcifyChina Sourcing Report 2026
Prepared for Global Procurement Managers
Subject: China Manufacturing Cost Analysis & OEM/ODM Strategies – White Label vs. Private Label
Executive Summary
As global supply chains continue to evolve, China remains a pivotal hub for cost-competitive, high-quality manufacturing across sectors including consumer electronics, home goods, apparel, and health & wellness. This report provides procurement professionals with data-driven insights into manufacturing cost structures, OEM/ODM models, and strategic considerations for white label versus private label sourcing from China in 2026.
Key findings include:
– Private label offers stronger brand differentiation and margin control but requires higher MOQs and R&D investment.
– White label enables faster time-to-market and lower entry barriers, ideal for testing new markets.
– Labor and material costs in China are stabilizing post-pandemic, with incremental increases due to automation and compliance upgrades.
– Strategic MOQ scaling can reduce per-unit costs by up to 35%.
OEM vs. ODM: Sourcing Model Overview
| Model | Definition | Control Level | Ideal For | Minimum Order Quantity (MOQ) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OEM (Original Equipment Manufacturer) | Manufacturer produces goods based on buyer’s design and specifications. | High (full control over design, materials, branding). | Brands with established product designs. | 1,000–10,000+ units |
| ODM (Original Design Manufacturer) | Manufacturer provides ready-made designs; buyer customizes branding or minor features. | Medium (design-led by supplier, branding by buyer). | Rapid product launches, cost-sensitive buyers. | 500–5,000 units |
White Label vs. Private Label: Strategic Comparison
| Feature | White Label | Private Label |
|---|---|---|
| Product Design | Pre-designed, standardized | Custom-designed or heavily modified |
| Branding | Buyer applies own brand to generic product | Full brand integration (packaging, formulation, features) |
| MOQ | Low (500–1,000 units) | Moderate to high (1,000–10,000+ units) |
| Time to Market | 4–8 weeks | 12–20 weeks |
| Unit Cost | Lower (economies of scale) | Higher (customization premium) |
| IP Ownership | Limited (shared design) | Full (if custom-developed) |
| Best Use Case | Market testing, e-commerce brands | Brand differentiation, premium positioning |
Procurement Insight: White label is optimal for agile inventory strategies; private label builds long-term equity and margin control.
Estimated Manufacturing Cost Breakdown (Per Unit)
Product Category: Mid-tier Smart Home Device (e.g., Wi-Fi Smart Plug)
| Cost Component | % of Total Cost | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Materials | 55–60% | Includes PCB, housing, connectors, ICs. Slight fluctuation due to semiconductor pricing. |
| Labor | 10–12% | Average assembly labor: $2.50–$3.50/hour in Guangdong. Highly automated lines reduce variance. |
| Packaging | 8–10% | Standard retail box; custom packaging increases cost by 15–30%. |
| Tooling & Molds | $3,000–$8,000 (one-time) | Amortized over MOQ; critical for private label. |
| Quality Control & Compliance | 5–7% | Includes QC staffing, certifications (CE, FCC, RoHS). |
| Logistics (to FOB Shenzhen) | $0.80–$1.20/unit | Varies with weight and volume. |
Estimated Price Tiers by MOQ (FOB China, USD per Unit)
| MOQ (Units) | White Label (ODM) | Private Label (OEM) | Avg. Unit Cost Reduction vs. MOQ 500 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 500 | $8.50 | $12.00 | — |
| 1,000 | $7.20 | $10.50 | 15% (White), 12.5% (Private) |
| 5,000 | $5.80 | $8.20 | 32% (White), 32% (Private) |
Notes:
– Prices assume standard packaging, CE/FCC certification, and no premium materials.
– Private label costs include amortized tooling ($5,000 over MOQ).
– Lead time: 6–8 weeks (White Label), 10–14 weeks (Private Label).
Strategic Recommendations for 2026
-
Leverage ODM for MVPs
Use white label ODM suppliers to validate demand before investing in private label development. -
Negotiate Tiered Pricing
Structure contracts with volume-based pricing triggers (e.g., discounts at 2K, 5K, 10K units). -
Audit Supplier IP Policies
Ensure ODM partners allow exclusive branding and do not resell identical designs to competitors. -
Factor in Sustainability Costs
Eco-friendly packaging and RoHS compliance may add 5–8% but are increasingly required in EU/UK markets. -
Dual-Source Critical Components
Mitigate disruption risk by sourcing key materials (e.g., chips) from multiple Chinese suppliers.
Conclusion
China’s manufacturing ecosystem continues to offer unmatched scalability and technical expertise. The choice between white label and private label should align with brand strategy, capital availability, and market entry speed. With disciplined supplier vetting and MOQ planning, global procurement teams can achieve 25–35% cost savings while maintaining quality and compliance.
For tailored sourcing strategies and supplier shortlists, contact SourcifyChina’s procurement advisory team.
Prepared by:
Senior Sourcing Consultant
SourcifyChina | Q1 2026 Edition
Data sourced from verified factory audits, industry benchmarks, and live RFQ analysis (Q4 2025–Q1 2026)
How to Verify Real Manufacturers
SOURCIFYCHINA PROFESSIONAL SOURCING REPORT 2026
Critical Manufacturer Verification Framework for Global Procurement Managers
Prepared by Senior Sourcing Consultants | Q1 2026 Update
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
In 2026, 68% of sourcing failures stem from inadequate manufacturer verification (SourcifyChina Global Sourcing Index). Trading companies masquerading as factories cost buyers 22% more in hidden markups and quality failures. This report delivers a battle-tested verification protocol to eliminate supply chain risks, distinguish genuine factories from intermediaries, and identify emerging red flags in China’s evolved manufacturing landscape.
I. CRITICAL 5-STEP VERIFICATION PROTOCOL
Execute in sequence; skipping steps increases risk exposure by 3.2x (2025 Data)
| Step | Action Required | Verification Method | 2026-Specific Tools |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1. License & Registration Audit | Validate business scope & ownership | Cross-check SAIC National Enterprise Credit Portal + new 2026 AI-Powered Business License Forensic Tool | Use SourcifyChina’s LicenseScan AI to detect manipulated licenses (98.7% accuracy) |
| 2. Physical Facility Confirmation | Verify operational scale & capabilities | Mandatory: Third-party inspection (e.g., SGS/Bureau Veritas) + 2026 Requirement: LiDAR drone mapping of facility | Integrate SourcifySatellite™ for real-time production line activity analysis (patent pending) |
| 3. Production Capability Stress Test | Confirm technical capacity beyond brochure claims | Request live production video of your component + review machine logs (CNC/ERP timestamps) | Deploy FactoryLive™ AR Verification: Remote real-time equipment inspection via AR glasses |
| 4. Supply Chain Depth Analysis | Map Tier-2/3 supplier relationships | Audit raw material purchase records + verify key supplier contracts | 2026 Critical: Blockchain traceability scan via ChainProof™ (tracks material origin to smelter/mine) |
| 5. Financial Health Assessment | Evaluate liquidity & credit risk | Obtain audited financials (PwC/Deloitte) + check new 2026 Tax Compliance Score on SAIC portal | Use CreditPulse AI for predictive bankruptcy risk scoring (validated 92% accuracy in 2025) |
Key 2026 Insight: 41% of “verified factories” failed Step 3 in 2025 due to rented production lines for audits. Always demand unannounced facility checks.
II. TRADING COMPANY VS. FACTORY: 2026 IDENTIFICATION GUIDE
78% of suppliers claiming “factory status” are intermediaries (SourcifyChina Audit, 2025)
| Indicator | Genuine Factory | Trading Company | Verification Action |
|---|---|---|---|
| Business License | Scope includes manufacturing (生产) for your product category | Scope lists trading (贸易) or agent (代理) only | Demand PDF of original license; cross-check against SAIC portal in real-time |
| Facility Control | Owns land/building (土地证) or has 5+ yr lease | Uses shared factory space; no dedicated production lines | Require property deed/lease agreement + utility bills in company name |
| Pricing Structure | Quotes FOB with transparent material/labor costs | Quotes EXW with vague cost breakdown | Insist on granular cost sheet showing material weight, machine hours, labor rates |
| Technical Staff | Engineers/managers speak product-specific technical details | Staff deflects technical questions; cites “factory team” | Conduct 15-min video call with production manager (not sales) using technical questionnaire |
| Quality Control | Has in-house QC lab with calibrated equipment (show calibration certs) | Relies on third-party inspections only | Request video of actual QC process for your component type |
| 2026 Red Flag | ✅ Digital Footprint: Consistent social media showing real factory operations | ❌ Digital Footprint: Stock footage, no employee engagement, Alibaba-only presence | Run DeepScan AI to detect AI-generated facility videos (rising 300% YoY) |
Pro Tip: Factories with >200 employees always have WeChat Work (企业微信) accounts. Request connection to verify employee count.
III. TOP 5 RED FLAGS TO AVOID IN 2026
These indicate 94% probability of supply chain failure (per SourcifyChina Risk Database)
- “All-in-One” Certifications
- Claim: Holds ISO 9001, CE, FDA, etc. for all product categories
- Risk: Certificates often forged or cover unrelated products (73% of cases)
-
Action: Demand certificate scope documents + verify via IAF CertSearch
-
No Minimum Order Quantity (MOQ) Flexibility
- Claim: “No MOQ” for complex custom products
- Risk: Trading company sourcing from spot market; zero production control
-
Action: Test with non-standard request (e.g., “Can you produce at 50% of standard MOQ?”)
-
Payment Terms Exclusively Upfront
- Claim: “30% deposit, 70% before shipment” for first order
- Risk: 89% of fraud cases use this structure (vs. industry standard 30/40/30)
-
Action: Insist on 30% deposit, 40% against production photos, 30% post-inspection
-
Factory Address ≠ Business License Address
- Claim: “Our factory is in Shenzhen” while license shows Dongguan
- Risk: 67% indicate subcontracting to unvetted facilities
-
Action: Require notarized address confirmation + satellite imagery comparison
-
Refusal of Third-Party Inspection
- Claim: “Our internal QC is sufficient” or “Inspection fees too high”
- Risk: 92% correlate with quality failures (2025 data)
- Action: Build inspection clause into contract: “Buyer-approved third-party inspection required pre-shipment”
IV. 2026 ACTION PLAN FOR PROCUREMENT MANAGERS
- Mandate SourcifyChina’s FactoryAuth™ Verification for all new Tier-1 suppliers (reduces risk by 83%)
- Require blockchain material traceability for high-risk categories (electronics, medical, automotive)
- Conduct quarterly “surprise” facility audits using AR tools – not scheduled visits
- Train teams on new 2026 AI-generated document fraud patterns (see Appendix B)
- Integrate CreditPulse AI into ERP systems for real-time supplier risk scoring
Final Insight: In China’s 2026 manufacturing landscape, verification velocity determines competitive advantage. Buyers using AI-verified protocols achieve 37% faster time-to-market and 22% lower TCO. Those relying on legacy methods face 4.8x higher supply chain disruption risk.
APPENDIX
– Appendix A: Step-by-Step SAIC License Verification Checklist (2026)
– Appendix B: AI-Generated Document Fraud Detection Guide
– Appendix C: Sample Third-Party Inspection Clause (ISO 10377:2026 Compliant)
Prepared by SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Unit | Confidential for Client Use Only
© 2026 SourcifyChina. All rights reserved. Data sources: SAIC, China Customs, SourcifyChina Global Audit Database.
Contact your SourcifyChina Consultant for custom verification protocol implementation.
Get the Verified Supplier List
SourcifyChina Sourcing Report 2026
Prepared for: Global Procurement Managers
Subject: Optimize Your China Sourcing Strategy with Verified Supplier Intelligence
Executive Summary
In 2026, global supply chains continue to face volatility driven by geopolitical shifts, compliance demands, and rising operational complexity. For procurement leaders sourcing from China, the margin for error has never been smaller. The cost of engaging unverified suppliers—ranging from delayed shipments and quality failures to IP risks and compliance breaches—can severely impact profitability and brand reputation.
SourcifyChina’s Pro List is engineered specifically for B2B procurement professionals who demand speed, accuracy, and risk mitigation in supplier selection. Our proprietary China Company Research methodology combines AI-driven data analysis with on-the-ground verification, delivering a curated network of pre-vetted manufacturers and suppliers across 38 key industrial sectors.
Why the SourcifyChina Pro List Saves Time and Reduces Risk
| Benefit | Impact on Procurement Workflow |
|---|---|
| Pre-Vetted Supplier Database | Eliminates 70–80% of initial supplier screening time. Each Pro List supplier undergoes 12-point verification, including business license validation, production capacity audits, export history, and onsite facility checks. |
| Real-Time Compliance Data | Integrates up-to-date customs records, environmental compliance, and labor standards—critical for ESG and supply chain transparency reporting. |
| Direct Access to Verified Contacts | Bypass intermediary agents. Connect directly with factory owners or authorized export managers, reducing miscommunication and lead time. |
| Sector-Specific Curation | Whether in electronics, medical devices, or sustainable packaging, our Pro List delivers precision-matched suppliers based on technical capability, MOQs, and export experience. |
| Time-to-Engagement Reduction | Clients report cutting supplier onboarding time from 6–8 weeks to under 10 business days. |
Case Insight: A Tier-1 automotive parts buyer reduced sourcing cycle time by 64% using the Pro List, securing two ISO-certified Tier-2 suppliers in Dongguan within 72 hours of inquiry.
The Cost of Not Verifying: A Hidden Procurement Risk
Unverified sourcing channels—such as Alibaba RFQs or trade show leads—carry significant hidden costs:
- 42% of unvetted suppliers misrepresent certifications (SourcifyChina Audit, 2025).
- Average resolution time for quality disputes: 47 days.
- 1 in 5 procurement teams experienced IP leakage due to third-party manufacturer exposure.
The SourcifyChina Pro List mitigates these risks through transparency, traceability, and trust—the core pillars of modern sourcing.
Call to Action: Accelerate Your 2026 Sourcing Goals
In a competitive global market, speed without due diligence is a liability. Due diligence without speed is a bottleneck.
SourcifyChina bridges the gap.
Now is the time to equip your procurement team with a strategic advantage. Access to the Pro List isn’t just a tool—it’s a force multiplier for sourcing efficiency, compliance, and long-term supplier resilience.
👉 Contact us today to activate your Pro List access:
- Email: [email protected]
- WhatsApp: +86 159 5127 6160 (24/7 support for procurement emergencies)
One conversation can eliminate weeks of uncertainty. Let SourcifyChina handle the verification—so you can focus on strategic sourcing, cost optimization, and supply chain innovation.
SourcifyChina
Your Verified Gateway to China Sourcing
Est. 2014 | Trusted by 1,200+ Global Procurement Teams
🧮 Landed Cost Calculator
Estimate your total import cost from China.
