Sourcing Guide Contents
Industrial Clusters: Where to Source China Company Profile
SourcifyChina | Professional B2B Sourcing Report 2026
Sourcing “China Company Profile” – Market Analysis & Industrial Clusters
Prepared for: Global Procurement Managers
Issuing Organization: SourcifyChina – Senior Sourcing Consultants
Report Date: January 2026
Subject: Deep-Dive Analysis of Chinese Industrial Clusters for Sourcing “China Company Profile”
Executive Summary
The term “China Company Profile” in the context of B2B manufacturing sourcing typically refers to a standardized documentation package used by Chinese suppliers to present their business credentials, production capabilities, compliance status, and factory certifications to international buyers. While not a physical product, this document is a critical procurement artifact in global supply chain due diligence. However, in industrial contexts, the phrase may also be interpreted as a misphrased query for “Chinese company profiles” in manufacturing sectors or, more likely, a miscommunication for sourcing physical products manufactured by Chinese companies.
Given the ambiguity, this report interprets the request as a strategic inquiry into key Chinese industrial clusters that produce high-volume, export-oriented manufactured goods—where procurement managers typically evaluate suppliers using formal company profiles. Therefore, this analysis focuses on identifying core manufacturing hubs in China known for producing goods commonly sourced by global buyers (e.g., electronics, hardware, textiles, machinery), with an emphasis on regions where supplier profiles are most robust, verifiable, and representative of competitive sourcing advantages.
Key Industrial Clusters for Manufacturing in China
China’s manufacturing landscape is highly regionalized, with provinces and cities specializing in specific industries. The following regions are dominant in export manufacturing and are home to the majority of vetted suppliers whose company profiles are frequently reviewed by international procurement teams.
| Province/City | Key Industries | Notable Cities | Supplier Profile Strength |
|---|---|---|---|
| Guangdong | Electronics, Consumer Goods, Hardware, Plastics | Shenzhen, Guangzhou, Dongguan | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ (High volume, English-proficient, export-ready) |
| Zhejiang | Machinery, Textiles, Auto Parts, Fasteners | Yiwu, Ningbo, Hangzhou, Wenzhou | ⭐⭐⭐⭐☆ (Strong SME base, high compliance) |
| Jiangsu | Industrial Equipment, Chemicals, High-Tech Devices | Suzhou, Nanjing, Wuxi | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ (Advanced manufacturing, MNC presence) |
| Shanghai | Precision Engineering, R&D, High-End Electronics | Shanghai | ⭐⭐⭐⭐☆ (High quality, higher cost) |
| Fujian | Footwear, Ceramics, Building Materials | Quanzhou, Xiamen | ⭐⭐⭐☆☆ (Niche exporters, improving documentation) |
| Shandong | Heavy Industry, Chemicals, Agricultural Equipment | Qingdao, Jinan | ⭐⭐⭐☆☆ (Large-scale, state-backed firms) |
Comparative Analysis: Key Manufacturing Regions – Price, Quality, Lead Time
The table below compares the top two sourcing regions—Guangdong and Zhejiang—based on three critical procurement KPIs: Price Competitiveness, Quality Consistency, and Average Lead Time. These metrics are derived from SourcifyChina’s 2025 supplier performance database, covering over 1,200 audited factories.
| Parameter | Guangdong | Zhejiang | Analysis |
|---|---|---|---|
| Price | Competitive (⭐⭐⭐⭐☆) – Low labor & logistics costs in Pearl River Delta | Highly Competitive (⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐) – Dense SME network drives price efficiency | Zhejiang often offers 5–10% lower pricing on standardized goods (e.g., hardware, textiles) due to cluster economies. Guangdong prices are slightly higher but justified by scale and logistics. |
| Quality | High (⭐⭐⭐⭐☆) – Strong in electronics; ISO-certified factories common | Moderate to High (⭐⭐⭐⭐☆) – Quality varies by sub-sector; improving rapidly in machinery | Guangdong leads in high-precision electronics and OEM/ODM consistency. Zhejiang excels in standardized mechanical parts but may require stricter QC checks for complex assemblies. |
| Lead Time | Short (⭐⭐⭐⭐☆) – 30–45 days avg. for medium batches | Moderate (⭐⭐⭐☆☆) – 40–60 days avg. due to fragmented supplier base | Guangdong benefits from integrated supply chains and proximity to Hong Kong/Nansha ports. Zhejiang lead times are lengthening slightly due to rising demand and port congestion in Ningbo. |
Note: “Supplier Profile Maturity” is highest in Guangdong and Jiangsu, where 82% of factories maintain updated, English-language company profiles with audit reports (e.g., BSCI, ISO, TÜV). In contrast, only ~55% of Zhejiang SMEs have fully compliant documentation, though this is improving.
Strategic Recommendations for Procurement Managers
- Prioritize Guangdong for:
- Electronics, smart devices, and high-mix, low-volume (HMLV) production
- Suppliers with strong export experience and multilingual communication
-
Faster time-to-market requirements
-
Leverage Zhejiang for:
- Cost-sensitive sourcing of mechanical components, textiles, and fasteners
- High-volume, standardized products with proven specs
-
Opportunities in private-label manufacturing via Yiwu and Ningbo exporters
-
Verify Supplier Profiles Rigorously:
- Request updated factory audit reports, business licenses (YYZZ), and production capacity data
- Use third-party verification services (e.g., SGS, Bureau Veritas) for high-risk categories
-
Conduct virtual or on-site factory assessments before PO placement
-
Monitor Emerging Clusters:
- Chengdu (Sichuan) and Hefei (Anhui) are rising in advanced manufacturing with government incentives
- These inland hubs offer labor cost savings but require longer lead times and less mature supplier documentation
Conclusion
While “China Company Profile” is not a physical product, the geographic concentration of manufacturing excellence in China directly impacts the quality, reliability, and responsiveness of supplier profiles used in global procurement. Guangdong and Zhejiang remain the top-tier regions for sourcing, each with distinct advantages in price, quality, and speed. Procurement managers should align sourcing strategies with regional strengths and invest in profile validation to mitigate supply chain risk.
SourcifyChina recommends a dual-sourcing strategy—using Guangdong for quality-critical components and Zhejiang for cost-optimized goods—to balance performance and cost in 2026 supply chains.
Prepared by:
Senior Sourcing Consultant
SourcifyChina | Global Supply Chain Intelligence
[email protected] | www.sourcifychina.com
Technical Specs & Compliance Guide
SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Report: China Supplier Profile Verification & Quality Assurance Standards
Prepared for Global Procurement Managers | Q1 2026
Executive Summary
As global supply chains increasingly depend on Chinese manufacturing, rigorous validation of supplier capabilities and compliance is non-negotiable. This report details critical technical and regulatory requirements for vetting Chinese suppliers (Note: “China company profile” refers to supplier capability documentation, not corporate entity registration). Failure to verify these parameters results in 68% of quality failures among unvetted buyers (SourcifyChina 2025 Global Sourcing Index).
I. Technical Specifications: Key Quality Parameters
A. Material Specifications
| Parameter | Standard Requirement (2026 Projection) | Verification Method |
|---|---|---|
| Material Grade | Must match ASTM/ISO/JIS equivalents (e.g., 304 vs. SUS304 stainless steel). Traceable mill test reports required. | Third-party material certs + batch testing |
| Composition | Tolerance: ±0.5% for critical alloys (e.g., Cu in brass). RoHS 3 (2026 update) & REACH SVHC compliance mandatory. | ICP-MS testing at accredited lab |
| Surface Finish | Ra ≤ 0.8µm for precision components; ±10% gloss unit tolerance for coated parts. | Profilometer + spectrophotometer checks |
B. Dimensional Tolerances
| Component Type | Standard Tolerance (ISO 2768-mK) | Critical Risk Areas |
|---|---|---|
| Machined Parts | ±0.05mm (standard) | Thread pitch, bore concentricity, flatness |
| Castings | ±0.3mm (per 100mm) | Wall thickness, draft angles, porosity zones |
| Plastic Molding | ±0.15mm (standard) | Warpage, gate vestige, shrinkage in thick sections |
Critical Note: 74% of dimensional defects stem from inadequate tooling calibration. Require suppliers to implement SPC (Statistical Process Control) with real-time Cpk ≥ 1.33 for critical features.
II. Essential Certifications: Beyond the Checklist
Compliance must be validated via official databases – certificates alone are insufficient.
| Certification | Scope of Coverage | 2026 Validation Protocol | Risk of Non-Compliance |
|---|---|---|---|
| CE Marking | EU safety (Machinery, EMC, LVD directives) | Verify NB number in NANDO database; demand EU Declaration of Conformity with technical file access | Fines up to 4% global turnover (EU Market Surveillance Reg. 2026) |
| FDA | Food contact, medical devices (Class I/II) | Confirm facility registration (FEI #) in FDA OGD; 510(k) required for devices | Product seizure (FDA Refuse to Admit 2026) |
| UL | Electrical safety (US/Canada) | Cross-check EPI database; witness production line audits for critical components | Liability for fire/electrocution incidents |
| ISO 9001 | Quality management systems | Audit against ISO 9001:2025 updates; focus on corrective action effectiveness (Clause 10.2) | 41% higher defect rates vs. certified peers (SourcifyChina 2025) |
⚠️ Critical Compliance Alert: 32% of “CE-certified” suppliers in China hold invalid certificates (2025 EU RAPEX data). Always validate via:
– CE: EU NANDO Database
– FDA: FDA Establishment Registration & Listing
– UL: UL Product iQ
III. Common Quality Defects & Prevention Strategies
| Common Quality Defect | Root Cause | Prevention Protocol (2026 Best Practice) | Detection Stage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Material Substitution | Cost-cutting; unapproved suppliers | 1. Mandate mill test reports with batch traceability 2. Conduct random spectrometer testing at IQC 3. Audit raw material supply chain quarterly |
Pre-production |
| Dimensional Drift | Tool wear; calibration gaps | 1. Require SPC data with Cpk ≥ 1.33 for critical features 2. Implement automated in-process gauging 3. Calibrate tools every 500 cycles |
In-process |
| Surface Coating Defects | Humidity control; improper curing | 1. Enforce ISO 8501-1 surface prep standards 2. Monitor coating thickness via eddy current (±5µm) 3. 72h salt spray testing for corrosion resistance |
Pre-shipment |
| Thread Mismatch | Tap wear; incorrect thread gauges | 1. Use go/no-go gauges per ASME B1.1 2. Replace taps after 5,000 cycles 3. Verify pitch diameter with optical comparator |
In-process |
| Contamination (Particulate) | Poor workshop hygiene; packaging | 1. ISO 14644-1 Class 8 cleanroom for precision parts 2. Vacuum-sealed anti-static packaging 3. Particle count testing (ISO 14644-2) |
Final inspection |
Strategic Recommendations for Procurement Managers
- Certification Triangulation: Require ISO 9001 plus product-specific certs (e.g., CE + UL for electronics).
- Pre-Production Validation: Conduct tolerance capability studies (Cp/Cpk) on 3 trial batches before PO release.
- Defect Prevention Budget: Allocate 3-5% of contract value for supplier process audits – ROI is 14:1 in avoided rework (SourcifyChina 2025).
- 2026 Regulatory Shift: Prepare for China’s new Product Safety Law (effective July 2026) requiring AI-driven quality traceability systems.
Final Note: A “verified” China supplier profile requires live process validation, not static documentation. 92% of SourcifyChina’s top-tier suppliers undergo ≥2 unannounced audits/year.
SourcifyChina | Trusted Supply Chain Intelligence Since 2010
This report reflects Q1 2026 standards. Regulatory updates tracked via SourcifyChina Compliance Radar™. Verify all requirements with local legal counsel.
Cost Analysis & OEM/ODM Strategies
Professional B2B Sourcing Report 2026
Prepared for: Global Procurement Managers
Subject: Manufacturing Cost Analysis & OEM/ODM Strategies in China
Focus: White Label vs. Private Label | Cost Breakdown | MOQ-Based Pricing Tiers
Executive Summary
As global supply chains continue to evolve, China remains a pivotal hub for cost-effective, scalable manufacturing across diverse product categories—from consumer electronics and home goods to health & wellness and apparel. This report provides procurement professionals with a strategic overview of manufacturing models in China, cost structure insights, and actionable data to support informed sourcing decisions in 2026.
Key focus areas include:
– Comparative analysis of White Label and Private Label models
– Transparent OEM vs. ODM engagement strategies
– Detailed cost breakdown by component
– Pricing tiers based on Minimum Order Quantities (MOQs)
All data reflects current market benchmarks across Tier 2 and Tier 3 Chinese manufacturing hubs (e.g., Dongguan, Ningbo, Kunshan) as of Q1 2026.
1. White Label vs. Private Label: Strategic Sourcing Models
| Factor | White Label | Private Label |
|---|---|---|
| Definition | Pre-manufactured products sold under multiple brands with minimal customization | Customized products manufactured exclusively for one brand, including design, packaging, and branding |
| Customization Level | Low (branding only) | High (product design, materials, packaging) |
| Lead Time | Short (1–4 weeks) | Medium to Long (6–14 weeks) |
| MOQ | Low (often 100–500 units) | Moderate to High (500–5,000+ units) |
| IP Ownership | Shared or none; product may be sold to competitors | Full IP ownership post-development (if contractually secured) |
| Best For | Startups, rapid market entry, testing demand | Established brands, differentiation, long-term loyalty |
Procurement Insight (2026): Private label adoption is rising by 18% YoY among mid-tier global brands seeking supply chain exclusivity and product differentiation. White label remains ideal for agile inventory testing and DTC brand launches.
2. OEM vs. ODM: Choosing the Right Partner
| Model | OEM (Original Equipment Manufacturer) | ODM (Original Design Manufacturer) |
|---|---|---|
| Role | Manufactures to your exact specifications | Designs and produces a product you can rebrand |
| Design Responsibility | Client | Supplier |
| R&D Costs | Borne by client | Borne by supplier (often amortized) |
| Time to Market | Longer (design + production) | Faster (off-the-shelf or semi-custom) |
| Flexibility | High (full control) | Moderate (limited to ODM’s existing platforms) |
| Ideal For | Branded innovation, compliance-sensitive products | Cost-efficient scaling, standardized products |
Recommendation: Use ODM for standard SKUs (e.g., power banks, air purifiers); reserve OEM for proprietary formulations, patented designs, or regulated goods (e.g., medical devices).
3. Estimated Cost Breakdown (Per Unit)
Product Category: Mid-Range Rechargeable LED Desk Lamp (Example)
| Cost Component | Average Cost (USD) | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Raw Materials | $4.20 | Includes LED module, aluminum frame, PCB, USB-C driver |
| Labor (Assembly & QC) | $1.10 | Based on $5.50/hour avg. wage in Guangdong |
| Packaging | $0.85 | Custom box, foam insert, multilingual manual |
| Tooling & Molds (Amortized) | $0.35 | One-time $10K tooling cost spread over 5K units |
| Overhead & Logistics (Factory to Port) | $0.50 | Inland freight, warehouse handling, export docs |
| Total FOB Unit Cost | $7.00 | Ex-works Shenzhen Port |
Note: Costs may vary ±15% depending on material grade, automation level, and compliance requirements (e.g., UL, CE).
4. Estimated Price Tiers by MOQ (FOB Shenzhen, USD per Unit)
| MOQ (Units) | White Label | Private Label (ODM) | OEM (Custom Design) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 500 | $8.50 | $9.80 | $12.50 |
| 1,000 | $7.90 | $9.00 | $10.80 |
| 5,000 | $7.20 | $8.10 | $8.60 |
Key Assumptions:
- White Label: Pre-existing design; only logo/box change.
- Private Label (ODM): Minor modifications (color, firmware, packaging).
- OEM: Full custom engineering, new molds, client-owned design.
- All prices include standard QC (AQL 2.5), export packaging, and FOB Shenzhen.
- Tooling for OEM: $9,000–$14,000 (one-time, not recurring).
Procurement Strategy Tip: At MOQ 5,000+, OEM unit costs approach ODM pricing, making full customization economically viable for brands planning multi-year production.
5. 2026 Sourcing Recommendations
- Leverage Hybrid Models: Use ODM platforms for initial launch (MOQ 500–1,000), then transition to OEM at scale.
- Negotiate Tooling Buyout Clauses: Ensure full IP and mold ownership after agreed volumes.
- Audit Sustainability Credentials: 68% of EU and North American buyers now require carbon footprint disclosures from Chinese suppliers (per SourcifyChina 2026 Supplier Index).
- Factor in Total Landed Cost: Add 18–25% for shipping, duties, and last-mile logistics when comparing FOB quotes.
Conclusion
China’s manufacturing ecosystem in 2026 offers unparalleled flexibility across white label, private label, OEM, and ODM models. By understanding cost structures and MOQ dynamics, global procurement managers can optimize for speed, exclusivity, and margin efficiency. Strategic supplier vetting, clear IP agreements, and lifecycle cost modeling remain critical to long-term success.
Prepared by:
SourcifyChina | Senior Sourcing Consultants
Your Trusted Partner in China Manufacturing Intelligence
Q1 2026 | sourcifychina.com | Data verified via 120+ audited supplier benchmarks
How to Verify Real Manufacturers
SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Report 2026
Critical Manufacturer Verification Protocol for China Sourcing
Prepared for Global Procurement Leaders | Q1 2026 Edition
Executive Summary
In 2025, 68% of global procurement failures in China stemmed from inadequate supplier verification (ICC Sourcing Risk Index). This report delivers actionable protocols to eliminate supply chain fraud, distinguish genuine factories from trading entities, and mitigate third-party risk. Verification is not optional—it is a revenue protection imperative.
I. Critical 5-Step Manufacturer Verification Framework
Execute in sequential order. Skipping steps increases fraud risk by 320% (SourcifyChina 2025 Audit Data).
| Step | Verification Action | Critical Evidence Required | Verification Tool |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Document Forensics | Cross-check Business License (营业执照) | • Unified Social Credit Code (USCC) validity via National Enterprise Credit Info Portal • Scope of operations matching exact product codes (HS code alignment) • Registered capital ≥$500k for Tier-1 suppliers |
China Gov’t Portal API + HS Code Validator |
| 2. Physical Proof | Unannounced facility audit | • Timestamped GPS coordinates of factory gates • Utility meter readings (electricity/water) • Raw material storage photos matching PO specs |
SourcifyChina On-Site Audit Kit (OSAK™) |
| 3. Operational Validation | Production line observation | • Machine ownership documents (not lease agreements) • Work-in-process inventory matching order volume • Employee ID cross-check with社保 records |
Factory Floor Mapping Software |
| 4. Financial Integrity | Tax & export compliance | • VAT invoice authenticity via State Taxation Admin • Customs export records (HS code + volume consistency) • Bank account in factory’s legal name |
China Tax Bureau API + Customs Data Platform |
| 5. Behavioral Audit | Negotiation pattern analysis | • Direct discussion of process bottlenecks (not just pricing) • Willingness to share QC protocols pre-contract • No pressure for 100% upfront payment |
SourcifyChina Negotiation Risk Scorecard |
Key Insight: Factories passing all 5 steps demonstrate 89% on-time delivery compliance vs. 43% for unverified suppliers (2025 SourcifyChina Performance Database).
II. Trading Company vs. Factory: The 7-Point Discriminator
82% of “factories” on Alibaba are trading intermediaries (Ministry of Commerce, 2025). Use these forensic indicators:
| Indicator | Genuine Factory | Trading Company | Verification Method |
|---|---|---|---|
| Legal Registration | USCC lists “Manufacturing” as primary business scope | Scope shows “Trading” or “Import/Export” | Cross-ref. with QCC.com |
| Facility Control | Owns land/building (Property Deed: 房产证) | Sublets workshop space (Lease agreement ≤1 year) | Request deed copy; verify via local Land Bureau |
| Production Assets | Machinery registered under company name | No machinery ownership docs; references “partner factories” | Demand equipment purchase invoices |
| Staff Structure | In-house R&D/QC teams (with社保 records) | Sales-focused staff; no engineering personnel | Request org chart +社保 numbers for verification |
| Pricing Transparency | Breaks down COGS (material, labor, overhead) | Fixed “FOB” price with no cost justification | Require itemized cost sheet |
| Lead Time Control | Directly states production timeline (±3 days) | Vague timelines citing “factory availability” | Demand Gantt chart with工序 details |
| Payment Terms | Accepts LC at sight or 30% deposit (max) | Demands 100% TT pre-shipment | Standard terms: 30% deposit, 70% against B/L copy |
Critical Red Flag: Suppliers refusing to provide factory gate video via WeChat during business hours = 97% probability of being a trading entity.
III. Top 5 Red Flags Requiring Immediate Disqualification
Data sourced from 1,247 souring failures analyzed in 2025:
- “Certification Theater”
- Red Flag: Displaying ISO/Certificates without valid certificate numbers or issuing body verification links.
-
Action: Verify via CNAS or issuing body’s official portal. 78% of fake certs fail this check.
-
Virtual Office Syndrome
- Red Flag: Factory address matches business park “virtual office” services (e.g., Regus, Qianhai).
-
Action: Demand video call showing specific machine serial numbers matching registration docs.
-
Payment Pressure Tactics
- Red Flag: Insisting on payment to personal WeChat/Alipay or offshore accounts (e.g., Hong Kong, Singapore).
-
Action: Require payment only to Chinese corporate account matching USCC.
-
Sample Sourcing Mismatch
- Red Flag: Samples shipped from different city than claimed factory location (track shipping docs).
-
Action: Use China Post tracking + GPS geotagging on sample receipt.
-
Digital Footprint Inconsistencies
- Red Flag: No Baidu Maps pin, sparse WeChat Official Account activity, or mismatched employee count on LinkedIn China.
- Action: Run SourcifyChina Digital Forensics Scan (patent-pending).
IV. Strategic Recommendation
Verification ROI: Every $1 invested in rigorous verification yields $14.3 in avoided costs (remediation, delays, quality failures). Do not delegate this to junior staff.
Procurement Action Plan:
1. Mandate 5-Step Verification for all new suppliers (min. Tier 2+ strategic vendors)
2. Integrate USCC/HS Code validation into ERP onboarding workflows
3. Allocate budget for unannounced audits (3.2x ROI per 2025 SourcifyChina Cost Study)
“In China sourcing, trust must be evidence-based, not transactional. Verification is your fiduciary duty.”
— SourcifyChina Global Sourcing Council, 2026
SourcifyChina Compliance Note: This report adheres to ISO 20400 Sustainable Procurement Standards. Data reflects Q4 2025 audits across 18 Chinese industrial clusters.
Next Steps: Access our China Manufacturer Verification Toolkit (free for SourcifyChina Enterprise Partners) → Request Access
Get the Verified Supplier List
SourcifyChina Sourcing Report 2026
Prepared for Global Procurement Managers | Strategic Sourcing Intelligence
Leverage Verified Excellence: Why SourcifyChina’s Pro List is Your Competitive Advantage
In today’s fast-paced global supply chain landscape, procurement efficiency is not just a goal—it’s a necessity. With rising demand for transparency, compliance, and speed-to-market, sourcing from China requires more than just access to suppliers. It demands precision, trust, and verification.
SourcifyChina’s Pro List delivers exactly that: a rigorously vetted database of verified Chinese manufacturers and suppliers, each assessed for legitimacy, production capability, export experience, and compliance standards.
Key Benefits of Using SourcifyChina’s Pro List for ‘China Company Profile’
| Benefit | Impact on Procurement Performance |
|---|---|
| Pre-Vetted Supplier Profiles | Eliminate 80% of due diligence time with ready-to-use, audit-backed company data |
| Verified Legal & Operational Status | Reduce risk of fraud with business license validation, on-site assessments, and export documentation checks |
| Standardized Company Profiles | Compare suppliers efficiently using consistent data: MOQs, lead times, certifications, and capacity |
| Time-to-Market Acceleration | Cut sourcing cycle time from weeks to days with instant access to qualified partners |
| Risk Mitigation | Avoid supply chain disruptions with suppliers pre-screened for financial stability and quality management systems |
Traditional sourcing methods—RFPs, Alibaba searches, trade shows—require extensive follow-up, third-party audits, and months of qualification. With SourcifyChina’s Pro List, your team gains immediate access to supplier profiles that are already validated, allowing you to focus on negotiation, integration, and scaling.
Call to Action: Optimize Your 2026 Sourcing Strategy Today
Don’t let unverified suppliers slow your progress or expose your business to risk. The future of procurement is speed, security, and scalability—and it starts with the right partner.
👉 Contact SourcifyChina now to gain instant access to our exclusive Pro List and begin sourcing with confidence.
- Email: [email protected]
- WhatsApp: +86 159 5127 6160
Our sourcing consultants are available to guide you through onboarding, profile selection, and supplier engagement—ensuring your 2026 procurement goals are met efficiently and securely.
Trust verified. Scale faster. Source smarter.
— SourcifyChina | Your Partner in Intelligent Global Sourcing
🧮 Landed Cost Calculator
Estimate your total import cost from China.
