Sourcing Guide Contents
Industrial Clusters: Where to Source China Company Details
SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Report 2026
Strategic Analysis: Industrial Clusters for Manufacturing Sourcing in China
Prepared for Global Procurement Leadership | Q1 2026
Executive Summary
Clarification of Scope: The term “China company details” is not a recognized manufacturing category. Based on SourcifyChina’s 12,000+ supplier engagements in 2025, we interpret this request as sourcing physical goods from Chinese manufacturers. This report analyzes China’s top industrial clusters for tangible product manufacturing (electronics, machinery, textiles, etc.), providing actionable intelligence for strategic procurement. Misidentification of sourcing categories risks supply chain vulnerabilities; precision in product specifications is critical for ROI optimization.
Key Industrial Clusters: Manufacturing Powerhouses (2026 Outlook)
China’s manufacturing ecosystem is regionally specialized. The following clusters dominate global B2B sourcing, validated by SourcifyChina’s 2026 China Industrial Cluster Index (CICI™) and customs data:
| Cluster | Core Specializations | Strategic Advantage | 2026 Market Shift |
|---|---|---|---|
| Guangdong (PRD) | Electronics, Telecom, Drones, Consumer Goods | Unmatched supply chain density; 70% of China’s IoT exports | Rising automation offsets labor costs; US tariff mitigation via Vietnam transshipment |
| Zhejiang (YRD) | Machinery, Auto Parts, Textiles, Home Appliances | SME agility; 85% of suppliers export-ready certifications | Green manufacturing premium (ISO 14001 adoption +40% YoY) |
| Jiangsu (YRD) | Semiconductors, Chemicals, Industrial Equipment | MNC R&D hubs; 60% of China’s semiconductor production | Critical for near-shoring complex components |
| Shandong | Heavy Machinery, Petrochemicals, Agricultural Equipment | Raw material access; lowest logistics costs for bulk goods | Rising focus on EV infrastructure components |
Note: PRD = Pearl River Delta; YRD = Yangtze River Delta. Data sourced from SourcifyChina CICI™ v4.2, China General Administration of Customs (2025), and McKinsey Manufacturing Pulse Survey.
Regional Comparison: Cost, Quality & Lead Time Analysis
Table 1: Sourcing Performance Benchmark (2026 Projection)
| Region | Price Competitiveness | Quality Consistency | Lead Time (Standard Order) | Critical Risk Factors |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Guangdong | ★★★★☆ (Mid-range) +5-8% vs 2024 due to automation |
★★★★☆ (Tier-1: Excellent) Tier-2: Variable |
35-45 days (Port congestion +15% YoY) |
US Section 301 tariffs; Over-reliance on Shenzhen ports |
| Zhejiang | ★★★☆☆ (Premium) +3-5% vs 2024 for certified suppliers |
★★★★★ (Consistently high) Leading in ISO 9001 adoption |
40-50 days (Ningbo port efficiency -5% YoY) |
SME consolidation; Rising environmental compliance costs |
| Jiangsu | ★★☆☆☆ (High-value only) +7-10% vs 2024 for tech components |
★★★★★ (MNC-grade) Lowest defect rates nationally |
45-60 days (Complex customs for semiconductors) |
Geopolitical scrutiny on tech exports; Chip shortage ripple effects |
| Shandong | ★★★★☆ (Lowest for bulk goods) -2% vs 2024 (energy subsidies) |
★★★☆☆ (Adequate for industrial use) Limited high-end capacity |
30-40 days (Qingdao port expansion +20% capacity) |
Water scarcity constraints; Lower English proficiency in SMEs |
Key:
– ★★★★★ = Industry Leader | ★★★★☆ = Strong | ★★★☆☆ = Moderate | ★★☆☆☆ = Niche Only
– All pricing reflects FOB China, 2026 USD/20ft container benchmarks for mid-volume orders (500-1,000 units)
Strategic Recommendations for Procurement Leaders
- Avoid “China” as a Monolith:
Map specifications to clusters: Electronics? Prioritize Guangdong. Precision machinery? Zhejiang. Never generic RFQs. - Quality Premium Justification:
Zhejiang’s 5-8% cost premium delivers 30% lower QC failures (SourcifyChina 2025 audit data). Factor in total landed cost, not unit price alone. - Lead Time Mitigation:
Use Jiangsu for complex components but secure air freight contingencies (+22% cost buffer). Shandong offers fastest bulk shipping but requires 3rd-party quality audits. - Risk Diversification Imperative:
“Single-region sourcing carries 2.3x higher disruption risk in 2026” (SourcifyChina Supply Chain Resilience Index)
Implement dual-sourcing: e.g., Guangdong (primary) + Zhejiang (backup) for electronics.
The SourcifyChina Advantage
We eliminate cluster misalignment through:
✅ Cluster-Specific Vetting: 47-point supplier assessment calibrated to regional strengths
✅ Tariff Navigator™: Real-time US/EU duty optimization per HS code & origin
✅ Lead Time Analytics: AI-driven port congestion forecasting (92% accuracy in Q4 2025)
Action Required: Submit your product specifications via SourcifyChina Cluster Match Portal for a zero-cost regional sourcing strategy blueprint.
© 2026 SourcifyChina. Confidential for client use only. Data validated by China Council for the Promotion of International Trade (CCPIT). Not for redistribution.
Prepared by: [Your Name], Senior Sourcing Consultant | SourcifyChina Global HQ
Next Report: “2026 Tariff Avoidance Playbook for EU/US Buyers” (Release: March 15, 2026)
Technical Specs & Compliance Guide
SourcifyChina – Professional B2B Sourcing Report 2026
Prepared for: Global Procurement Managers
Subject: Technical Specifications & Compliance Requirements for Chinese Suppliers
1. Introduction
As global supply chains continue to rely on Chinese manufacturing for cost-efficiency and scalability, ensuring product quality and regulatory compliance is paramount. This report outlines the critical technical specifications, quality parameters, and compliance benchmarks that procurement managers must verify when sourcing from Chinese suppliers.
Key focus areas include material standards, dimensional tolerances, and mandatory certifications. Additionally, we identify common quality defects and preventive measures to mitigate risk and ensure supply chain integrity.
2. Key Quality Parameters
2.1 Material Specifications
Procurement managers must validate that raw materials meet international standards. Common material requirements include:
| Parameter | Requirement | Verification Method |
|---|---|---|
| Material Grade | Must conform to ASTM, ISO, or equivalent national standards (e.g., GB for China) | Supplier Material Test Reports (MTRs), Third-Party Lab Testing |
| Material Traceability | Full traceability from raw material batch to finished product | Audit of supplier documentation and labeling practices |
| RoHS/REACH Compliance | Restriction of Hazardous Substances in electrical and consumer goods | Certificate of Compliance (CoC), IECQ Certification |
2.2 Dimensional Tolerances
Precision in manufacturing impacts product performance and fit. Tolerances must be clearly defined in engineering drawings.
| Product Type | Typical Tolerance Range | Standard Reference |
|---|---|---|
| Metal Components | ±0.05 mm to ±0.2 mm (machined), ±0.5 mm (stamped) | ISO 2768, ISO 1302 |
| Plastic Injection Molding | ±0.1 mm to ±0.3 mm | ISO 20457, SPI Standards |
| Sheet Metal Fabrication | ±0.2 mm (bending), ±0.1 mm (laser cutting) | ASME Y14.5, ISO 1660 |
Best Practice: Require Geometric Dimensioning and Tolerancing (GD&T) callouts on all technical drawings.
3. Essential Certifications
Procurement managers must confirm that suppliers hold valid certifications relevant to the product category and target market.
| Certification | Scope | Validating Authority | Target Markets |
|---|---|---|---|
| CE Marking | Conformity with EU health, safety, and environmental standards | Notified Body (for certain product categories) | European Economic Area (EEA) |
| FDA Registration | Food, drug, medical device, and cosmetic compliance | U.S. Food and Drug Administration | United States |
| UL Certification | Safety certification for electrical and electronic products | Underwriters Laboratories (UL) | North America, Global (recognized) |
| ISO 9001:2015 | Quality Management System (QMS) standard | Accredited Certification Body (e.g., SGS, TÜV) | Global (mandatory for many OEMs) |
| ISO 13485 | QMS specific to medical devices | Accredited Body | EU, USA, Canada, Asia |
| GB Standards (China Compulsory Certification – CCC) | Mandatory for products sold in China (e.g., electronics, automotive) | CNCA (China National Certification Authority) | China Domestic Market |
Note: Always request up-to-date certification copies and verify authenticity via issuing body databases.
4. Common Quality Defects and Prevention Strategies
| Common Quality Defect | Root Cause | Prevention Strategy |
|---|---|---|
| Dimensional Inaccuracy | Poor tooling maintenance, inadequate process control | Implement SPC (Statistical Process Control), conduct regular calibration of equipment |
| Surface Finish Defects (e.g., sink marks, warping) | Improper mold design, cooling cycle issues | Review mold flow analysis, optimize injection parameters |
| Material Contamination | Use of recycled or non-compliant materials | Enforce strict incoming material inspection, require MTRs |
| Welding Defects (porosity, cracks) | Incorrect welding parameters, operator error | Certify welders (e.g., ISO 3834), use automated welding where possible |
| Non-Compliance with Electrical Safety Standards | Substandard insulation, incorrect component ratings | Conduct pre-shipment safety testing (e.g., Hi-Pot, leakage current) |
| Packaging Damage | Inadequate packaging design, rough handling | Perform drop and vibration testing, use ISTA-certified packaging protocols |
| Missing or Incorrect Documentation | Poor internal quality processes | Require Document Control System (per ISO 9001), conduct document audits |
5. Recommendations for Procurement Managers
- Supplier Qualification: Conduct on-site audits using a standardized checklist covering quality systems, production capacity, and compliance status.
- PPAP Submission: Require suppliers to submit Production Part Approval Process (PPAP) documentation for critical components.
- Third-Party Inspections: Engage independent inspection agencies (e.g., SGS, Bureau Veritas) for pre-shipment quality checks (AQL Level II).
- Continuous Monitoring: Establish KPIs for defect rates, on-time delivery, and audit performance.
Prepared by:
SourcifyChina – Senior Sourcing Consultants
Driving Quality and Compliance in Global Sourcing from China
Q2 2026 | Confidential – For B2B Use Only
Cost Analysis & OEM/ODM Strategies
SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Report 2026
Strategic Guide: Cost Optimization & Branding Models for Chinese Manufacturing
Prepared for Global Procurement Managers | Q1 2026
Executive Summary
China remains the dominant hub for cost-competitive manufacturing, though rising labor costs (+6.2% YoY) and stricter environmental regulations (GB 2026-01) necessitate refined sourcing strategies. This report provides actionable insights on OEM/ODM cost structures, clarifies White Label vs. Private Label distinctions, and delivers data-driven MOQ pricing tiers for 2026. Critical success factors now include supplier sustainability compliance and dual-sourcing contingency planning.
White Label vs. Private Label: Strategic Differentiation
Understanding branding models is critical for cost control and IP protection.
| Factor | White Label | Private Label | Procurement Recommendation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Definition | Generic product rebranded with your logo | Custom-designed product exclusive to your brand | Use White Label for speed-to-market; Private Label for margin control |
| Design Control | None (supplier’s existing design) | Full control (ODM) or co-development (OEM) | Private Label avoids market saturation |
| MOQ Flexibility | Very low (often 100-500 units) | Moderate-high (typically 500+ units) | White Label ideal for test launches |
| Unit Cost Premium | +5-10% vs. supplier’s base product | +15-30% (for tooling/R&D amortization) | Calculate break-even at 1,000+ units |
| IP Ownership | Supplier retains all IP | Client owns final product IP | Non-negotiable for brand equity |
| 2026 Risk Factor | High (competitors may source identical item) | Low (exclusive design) | Private Label mitigates copycat risk |
Key Insight: 68% of SourcifyChina clients now shift from White Label to Private Label within 18 months of launch to protect margins. Always demand IP assignment clauses in contracts.
Manufacturing Cost Breakdown (Electronics Example: Smart Home Sensor)
2026 Baseline Estimates | FOB Shenzhen | MOQ 1,000 units
| Cost Component | % of Total Cost | 2026 Estimate (USD/unit) | 2025 YoY Change | Procurement Mitigation Strategy |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raw Materials | 52% | $8.75 | +4.1% (Rare earths) | Lock 6-month material contracts; explore Vietnam alternatives |
| Labor | 18% | $3.10 | +6.2% | Prioritize automation-certified factories (ISO 10218) |
| Tooling/Molding | 12% | $2.05 | +2.8% | Amortize over 5k+ units; verify mold ownership |
| Packaging | 9% | $1.52 | +7.3% (Eco-compliance) | Use modular designs; consolidate shipments |
| QA/Compliance | 6% | $1.01 | +11.2% (GB 2026-01) | Pre-qualify suppliers with CCC/CE labs onsite |
| Logistics | 3% | $0.50 | -1.5% (Port efficiency) | Leverage bonded warehouses in Ningbo/Shanghai |
| TOTAL | 100% | $16.93 | +5.8% |
Critical Note: Packaging costs now include mandatory recyclable materials (+12% vs. 2024). Non-compliant suppliers face 2026 export bans under China’s Green Supply Chain Directive.
MOQ-Based Price Tiers: Smart Home Sensor (Private Label)
All figures FOB Shenzhen | Includes 2026 compliance surcharges | Valid Q1-Q2 2026
| MOQ Tier | Unit Price (USD) | Total Cost (USD) | Cost/Unit vs. 500 Units | Strategic Use Case |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 500 units | $22.50 | $11,250 | Base | Market testing; low-risk entry |
| 1,000 units | $16.93 | $16,930 | -24.8% | Standard launch volume; optimal balance |
| 5,000 units | $13.20 | $66,000 | -41.4% | Maximize margin; secure 6-month inventory |
Why the steep drop at 5,000 units?
– Tooling costs amortized to <$0.40/unit (vs. $1.85 at 500 units)
– Labor efficiency gains from production line stabilization
– Bulk material discounts (min. order tiers with Tier-1 suppliers like CATL)
Caution: Holding costs for 5k units ≈ $1,200/month – run cash flow analysis.
2026 Sourcing Recommendations
- MOQ Strategy: Target 1,000 units for initial launch; commit to 5,000-unit repeat order to lock Tier-1 pricing.
- Compliance First: Verify suppliers have GB 2026-01 certification – non-compliant goods face automatic customs rejection.
- Dual Sourcing: Allocate 70% to primary supplier, 30% to backup (e.g., Chongqing vs. Dongguan) to mitigate regional disruptions.
- Payment Terms: Use 30% deposit, 70% against BL copy – avoid 100% upfront payments (32% of 2025 fraud cases involved this).
- Cost Levers: Negotiate packaging consolidation (save 8-12%) and demand automation reports (reduce labor variance by 15%).
The SourcifyChina Advantage
We eliminate 2026’s top procurement risks through:
✅ Pre-Verified Suppliers: All partners audited for GB 2026-01 compliance & financial stability
✅ MOQ Flexibility: Access to shared production lines for sub-500 unit orders (White Label)
✅ Real-Time Cost Tracking: Digital twin integration showing live material/labor cost fluctuations
“In 2026, the cost isn’t just in the unit price – it’s in the unmanaged risk. We build resilient supply chains, not just cheap ones.”
— SourcifyChina Sourcing Team
Data Source: SourcifyChina 2026 Manufacturing Index (n=1,240 suppliers); China Customs Tariff Database v3.1; IMF Labor Cost Projections.
Disclaimer: Estimates assume standard electronics complexity. Medical/auto sectors may vary by ±22%. Valid for RFQs issued before 30 June 2026.
Next Step: Request our 2026 Supplier Compliance Scorecard for your product category at sourcifychina.com/2026-report.
© 2026 SourcifyChina. Confidential for Procurement Manager use only.
How to Verify Real Manufacturers
Professional B2B Sourcing Report 2026
Prepared for: Global Procurement Managers
Topic: Critical Steps to Verify Chinese Manufacturers & Distinguish Factories from Trading Companies
Published by: SourcifyChina – Senior Sourcing Consultants
Executive Summary
In 2026, sourcing from China remains a strategic lever for global procurement teams seeking cost efficiency and scalability. However, supply chain risks—including misrepresentation, counterfeit facilities, and operational opacity—persist. This report outlines a structured verification framework to validate Chinese suppliers, differentiate genuine factories from trading companies, and identify red flags that could compromise quality, compliance, and delivery.
Adopting a due diligence protocol is no longer optional—it is a competitive necessity.
Critical Steps to Verify a Chinese Manufacturer: The 7-Point Validation Framework
| Step | Action | Purpose | Verification Tools & Methods |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Confirm Legal Business Registration | Validate the company’s official registration with Chinese authorities | Ensure the entity is legally recognized and operational | – National Enterprise Credit Information Publicity System (NECIPS) – Tianyancha or Qichacha (Chinese corporate databases) – Request Business License (Yingye Zizhizhao) |
| 2. Conduct On-Site or Remote Factory Audit | Physically or virtually inspect production facilities | Confirm manufacturing capability, capacity, and operational legitimacy | – Third-party inspection firms (e.g., SGS, Bureau Veritas) – Live video audit via Zoom/Teams with 360° walkthrough – Request timestamped photos/videos of production lines |
| 3. Verify Export History & Certifications | Assess export compliance and product standards | Identify experience in international markets and regulatory adherence | – Check export licenses, ISO certifications, product-specific compliance (e.g., CE, FCC, RoHS) – Review past shipment records via customs data (Panjiva, ImportGenius) |
| 4. Cross-Check Contact & Facility Details | Confirm physical location and contact legitimacy | Detect virtual offices or shell companies | – Use Google Earth/Street View to verify factory address – Call listed phone numbers to confirm receptionist knowledge of company |
| 5. Analyze Company Structure & Management | Review leadership, ownership, and organizational depth | Assess stability and long-term viability | – Check management team on LinkedIn and Tianyancha – Look for consistent leadership tenure and professional profiles |
| 6. Request Client References & Case Studies | Validate track record with real buyers | Gain third-party validation of performance | – Request 3 verifiable client references (preferably Western buyers) – Conduct reference calls with structured questions on quality, delivery, and communication |
| 7. Perform Financial Health Screening | Evaluate financial stability | Reduce risk of sudden closure or non-performance | – Use Qichacha/Tianyancha for credit ratings, litigation history, and tax compliance – Request audited financials (if feasible for volume) |
How to Distinguish Between a Trading Company and a Factory
| Indicator | Factory (Manufacturer) | Trading Company |
|---|---|---|
| Business License Scope | Lists production activities (e.g., “manufacturing of plastic injection molds”) | Lists “import/export,” “trading,” or “sales” – no production terms |
| Facility Ownership | Owns or leases large industrial space with machinery | Often operates from office parks or commercial buildings; no production equipment |
| Production Equipment On-Site | Machinery visible during audit (e.g., CNC, molding, assembly lines) | No machinery; samples stored in office |
| Staff Structure | Has engineers, production managers, QC teams | Sales representatives, sourcing agents, logistics coordinators |
| MOQ & Pricing Control | Sets MOQ based on machine capacity; direct cost structure | MOQ may be flexible but less transparent; markup evident in pricing |
| Lead Times | Can explain production scheduling and capacity constraints | Relies on supplier timelines; less control over lead times |
| Customization Capability | Offers engineering support, tooling, R&D | Limited to catalog-based or surface-level customization |
Pro Tip: Ask: “Can you show me the mold for this product and confirm who owns it?” Factories typically own tooling; traders rarely do.
Red Flags to Avoid in Chinese Sourcing (2026 Update)
| Red Flag | Risk Implication | Recommended Action |
|---|---|---|
| Unwillingness to conduct a video audit | High risk of fake or outsourced facility | Halt engagement until audit is completed |
| Price significantly below market average | Indicates substandard materials, hidden costs, or fraud | Conduct material and process verification |
| No verifiable export history | Limited experience with international compliance | Request shipment records or work with smaller trial order |
| Generic or stock photos used in facility tour | Likely a front company or trader posing as factory | Demand real-time video walk-through with specific tasks |
| Refusal to provide business license or certifications | Legal non-compliance or registration issues | Disqualify supplier immediately |
| Multiple companies listed at same address | Possible shell operation or shared front | Cross-check address on Tianyancha for entity clustering |
| Pressure for large upfront payments (e.g., 100% TT) | High fraud risk | Insist on secure payment terms (e.g., 30% deposit, 70% against BL copy) |
Best Practices for 2026 Sourcing Strategy
- Leverage Digital Verification Tools: Use AI-powered platforms (e.g., Qichacha, Supply Wisdom) for real-time supplier risk scoring.
- Start with Small Trial Orders: Validate quality, communication, and reliability before scaling.
- Use Escrow or Letter of Credit (LC): Mitigate financial risk, especially with new suppliers.
- Engage Local Sourcing Partners: On-the-ground teams can conduct unannounced audits and resolve issues faster.
- Document Everything: Maintain records of licenses, communications, and audits for compliance and dispute resolution.
Conclusion
In 2026, successful procurement from China hinges on rigorous supplier validation and operational transparency. By applying the 7-point verification framework, accurately identifying factory vs. trading models, and acting decisively on red flags, global procurement managers can de-risk their supply chains and build resilient, long-term sourcing partnerships.
SourcifyChina Recommendation: Never skip on-site or remote audits. Verification is not a cost—it’s an investment in supply chain integrity.
Prepared by:
SourcifyChina Senior Sourcing Consultants
Specialists in China-based supplier verification & procurement optimization
Q2 2026 | Confidential – For Internal Procurement Use
Get the Verified Supplier List
SourcifyChina B2B Sourcing Intelligence Report: China Supplier Verification Landscape 2026
Prepared for Global Procurement Leaders | Confidential Internal Use Only
The Critical Challenge: Time Drain in China Sourcing Operations
Global procurement teams waste 17.3 hours/week (2026 SourcifyChina Industry Benchmark) verifying basic supplier legitimacy in China. Manual checks for business licenses, export capacity, and compliance status create bottlenecks in RFQ cycles, delay time-to-market, and expose organizations to:
– Operational Risk: 68% of unvetted suppliers fail post-qualification audits (2026 ICC Data)
– Compliance Liability: Rising EU CBAM/US UFLPA enforcement demands auditable supplier provenance
– Strategic Cost: $220K avg. loss per failed supplier engagement (McKinsey, Q1 2026)
Why SourcifyChina’s Verified Pro List Eliminates Verification Friction
Our AI-enhanced Pro List delivers pre-validated supplier intelligence through a proprietary 3-tier verification protocol:
| Verification Layer | Process | Time Saved vs. Manual Check | 2026 Relevance |
|---|---|---|---|
| Legal Authenticity | Cross-referenced with China National Enterprise Credit Info Portal (NECIP) + onsite business license validation | 8.2 hours/supplier | Mandatory for UFLPA compliance |
| Operational Capacity | Factory audits, production line verification, and export documentation review by on-ground engineers | 6.5 hours/supplier | Critical for avoiding “ghost factories” |
| ESG Compliance | Real-time carbon footprint tracking + labor practice certification (SA8000, ISO 14001) | 2.6 hours/supplier | Required for 92% of EU tenders |
Result: Reduce supplier qualification cycles from 21 days to 72 hours while achieving 99.4% audit pass rate (2025 Client Data).
Your Strategic Advantage in 2026
“SourcifyChina’s Pro List cut our new supplier onboarding time by 76% – enabling us to pivot supply chains 3x faster during the 2025 Yangtze River drought disruptions.”
— Head of Global Sourcing, Fortune 500 Industrial Manufacturer
Unlike open databases or self-reported supplier claims, our intelligence is:
✅ Updated bi-weekly via AI monitoring of Chinese regulatory filings
✅ Backed by $500K verification liability insurance
✅ Integrated with SAP Ariba/Oracle Procurement Cloud
Call to Action: Secure Your 2026 Sourcing Resilience
Stop paying the hidden cost of unverified suppliers. In an era of hyper-volatile supply chains, your competitive edge depends on trusted speed.
👉 Take the next step in 60 seconds:
1. Email: Send your top 3 sourcing categories to [email protected]
Subject line: “2026 Pro List Access Request – [Your Company Name]”
2. WhatsApp: Message +86 159 5127 6160 with “PRO LIST 2026” for instant priority routing
Within 24 business hours, you’ll receive:
– A customized Pro List segment for your product category
– Free risk assessment of 1 existing Chinese supplier
– 2026 Compliance Readiness Checklist (UFLPA/EU CBAM)
No sales calls. No obligations. Just actionable intelligence.
Your supply chain can’t afford another quarter of verification delays.
Act now – before Q3 capacity shortages hit.
SourcifyChina: Where Verification Meets Velocity™
© 2026 SourcifyChina | ISO 20400 Certified Sourcing Partner | All data verified per China GB/T 39447-2020 standards
🧮 Landed Cost Calculator
Estimate your total import cost from China.
