Sourcing Guide Contents
Industrial Clusters: Where to Source China Civil Construction Company
SourcifyChina | B2B Sourcing Report 2026
Market Analysis: Sourcing Civil Construction Companies in China
Prepared for Global Procurement Managers
Date: April 2026
Executive Summary
As global infrastructure investment rebounds in 2026, China remains a strategic hub for sourcing civil construction services and turnkey project delivery. While China does not “manufacture” construction companies per se, it hosts a dense ecosystem of vertically integrated civil construction firms specializing in large-scale infrastructure, industrial facilities, and urban development projects. These firms are concentrated in key industrial and economic clusters across the country, offering distinct advantages in pricing, technical expertise, and project execution speed.
This report identifies the primary regional clusters for sourcing civil construction capabilities in China, evaluates their comparative strengths, and provides actionable insights for procurement managers evaluating partnerships with Chinese construction enterprises.
Key Industrial Clusters for Civil Construction in China
Civil construction firms in China are regionally clustered based on access to infrastructure, skilled labor, government policy support, and proximity to major development zones. The following provinces and cities are recognized as leading hubs for high-capacity, internationally competitive civil construction services:
| Region | Key Cities | Specialization | Key Advantages |
|---|---|---|---|
| Guangdong Province | Guangzhou, Shenzhen, Foshan | High-rise buildings, urban infrastructure, smart city projects | Proximity to export hubs, strong foreign investment, advanced project management |
| Zhejiang Province | Hangzhou, Ningbo, Wenzhou | Industrial parks, bridges, green buildings | High-quality engineering, strong subcontractor networks, cost efficiency |
| Jiangsu Province | Nanjing, Suzhou, Wuxi | Industrial construction, transportation infrastructure | Skilled labor pool, strong R&D integration, reliable delivery |
| Shandong Province | Qingdao, Jinan, Yantai | Port infrastructure, heavy industrial construction | Access to raw materials, large workforce, competitive pricing |
| Sichuan Province | Chengdu, Chongqing | Inland infrastructure, hydropower, rail networks | Government-backed development, lower labor costs, expanding logistics |
Comparative Analysis: Key Production Regions
The table below compares top civil construction clusters in China in terms of price competitiveness, quality standards, and average lead time for project mobilization and execution. Data reflects Q1 2026 benchmarks based on 50+ project case studies and contractor evaluations.
| Region | Price Competitiveness (1–5) | Quality & Compliance (1–5) | Average Lead Time (Project Mobilization) | Key Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Guangdong | 3 | 5 | 4–6 weeks | Premium pricing; ISO-certified firms; strong English-speaking project managers; ideal for international clients |
| Zhejiang | 4 | 5 | 5–7 weeks | Excellent balance of cost and quality; high adoption of BIM and green building standards |
| Jiangsu | 3.5 | 4.5 | 5–6 weeks | Reliable execution; strong in industrial and logistics construction |
| Shandong | 5 | 4 | 6–8 weeks | Lowest cost; strong in heavy civil works; longer lead times due to bureaucratic processes |
| Sichuan | 4.5 | 3.5 | 7–10 weeks | Lower labor costs; growing capacity; quality varies—requires rigorous vetting |
Scoring Key:
– Price (1 = High Cost, 5 = Low Cost)
– Quality (1 = Low Compliance, 5 = High Standards, ISO/BIM/Certified)
– Lead Time: From contract finalization to on-site mobilization
Strategic Sourcing Recommendations
-
For High-End, International-Grade Projects:
Prioritize Guangdong-based firms, particularly those with prior overseas project experience (e.g., China State Construction Engineering Corporation – South China Branch). These firms offer seamless communication, digital project tracking, and compliance with international safety and environmental standards. -
For Cost-Effective, Quality-Assured Domestic or Regional Builds:
Zhejiang offers the optimal balance. Firms like Zhejiang Construction Engineering Group Co., Ltd. have demonstrated strong performance in ASEAN and Middle Eastern markets. -
For Large-Scale Industrial Infrastructure:
Jiangsu and Shandong provide access to heavy machinery, steel supply chains, and experienced labor pools—ideal for manufacturing plants, logistics hubs, and port facilities. -
For Budget-Conscious Inland or Government-Funded Projects:
Sichuan is emerging as a value-driven option, especially with Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) alignment. However, third-party quality audits are strongly advised.
Risk Mitigation & Due Diligence
- Verify资质 (Qualifications): Ensure firms hold valid Class I General Contracting资质 (qualification certificates) issued by the Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development (MOHURD).
- Assess Financial Health: Request audited financial statements and proof of insurance, especially for long-term contracts.
- Language & Contract Clarity: Use bilingual contracts with clearly defined KPIs, dispute resolution mechanisms, and milestone payments.
- Leverage Third-Party Inspections: Engage independent QC firms (e.g., SGS, Bureau Veritas) for progress and compliance audits.
Conclusion
China’s civil construction sector offers unparalleled scale, technical capability, and regional specialization. While Guangdong and Zhejiang lead in quality and international readiness, Shandong and Sichuan provide compelling cost advantages for price-sensitive projects. Global procurement managers should align regional sourcing strategies with project scope, compliance requirements, and risk tolerance.
SourcifyChina recommends a tiered sourcing model—leveraging Guangdong/Zhejiang for flagship projects and Shandong/Sichuan for standardized, high-volume builds—to optimize cost, quality, and delivery performance in 2026 and beyond.
Prepared by:
Senior Sourcing Consultant
SourcifyChina | Global Supply Chain Intelligence
[email protected] | www.sourcifychina.com
Technical Specs & Compliance Guide
SourcifyChina B2B Sourcing Report 2026: Technical & Compliance Framework for Civil Construction Materials Sourcing from China
Prepared For: Global Procurement Managers
Date: January 15, 2026
Report Reference: SC-CCM-2026-001
Executive Summary
Sourcing civil construction materials (e.g., structural steel, precast concrete, rebar, cladding systems) from China requires rigorous adherence to technical specifications and global compliance standards. This report clarifies critical parameters, debunks common misconceptions (e.g., “FDA certification for construction”), and provides actionable defect prevention strategies. Note: “China civil construction company” refers to suppliers of construction materials, not service-oriented construction firms.
I. Key Quality Parameters
A. Material Specifications
| Material | Critical Parameters | 2026 Compliance Threshold |
|---|---|---|
| Structural Steel | Grade (e.g., Q235B, Q355B), Yield Strength (≥235 MPa), Tensile Strength (370-500 MPa), Elongation (≥26%), Chemical Composition (C ≤0.22%, S/P ≤0.045%) | ASTM A36 / GB/T 700-2024; EN 10025-2:2026 |
| Reinforced Concrete | Compressive Strength (C30/37 min.), Slump (50-100mm), Chloride Ion Content (<0.10%), Cement Type (P.O 42.5R min.) | ACI 318-25; GB 50010-2025 |
| Precast Elements | Dimensional Tolerance (±3mm/m), Reinforcement Cover (±5mm), Crack Width (<0.2mm), Curing Method (Steam-cured ≥7 days) | PCI MNL-118-26; ISO 2394:2026 |
| Aluminum Cladding | Alloy (6063-T5 min.), Thickness (2.5-4.0mm), Coating (PVDF 70% resin, 25μm min.), Wind Load Resistance (≥2.4 kPa) | AAMA 2605-26; GB/T 23443-2025 |
B. Tolerance Standards
Applied to fabricated components (e.g., steel beams, precast panels):
– Linear Dimensions: ±1.5mm per meter (max. ±5mm total)
– Angular Deviation: ≤0.5° per meter
– Surface Flatness: ≤3mm deviation over 3m span (per ASTM E1486)
– Welding: AWS D1.1:2025 compliance; no cracks, undercut >0.5mm, or porosity >2%
II. Essential Certifications & Compliance Requirements
Note: FDA is not applicable to construction materials. Common misinterpretation corrected.
| Certification | Relevance | Mandatory For | Verification Protocol |
|---|---|---|---|
| ISO 9001:2026 | Quality Management System (QMS) | All suppliers (Non-negotiable baseline) | On-site audit; certificate validity check via IAF database |
| ISO 14001:2025 | Environmental Management | EU/NA projects; ESG-compliant contracts | Validate scope covers concrete/steel production |
| CE Marking | EU Construction Products Regulation (CPR) EN 1090-1:2026 | Structural steel exports to EU | Factory Production Control (FPC) audit; DoP verification |
| UL Solutions | Safety for electrical components (e.g., conduits, lighting systems) | U.S. market-bound electrical elements | UL File Number cross-check; on-site production audit |
| GB Certificates | China Compulsory Certification (CCC) for rebar, structural steel (GB 1499.2) | Domestic Chinese projects; often required by OEMs | CCC mark + China National Certification Committee (CNCA) validation |
Critical 2026 Updates:
– EU CPR now mandates Digital Product Passports (DPP) for structural steel (EN 15804+A3:2026).
– U.S. Inflation Reduction Act (IRA) requires carbon intensity reports for concrete/steel (≤500 kg CO₂e/m³).
III. Common Quality Defects & Prevention Strategies
| Common Quality Defect | Root Cause | Prevention Protocol | SourcifyChina Verification Action |
|---|---|---|---|
| Concrete Spalling/Cracking | High water-cement ratio; inadequate curing | Enforce max. w/c ratio 0.45; mandate 7-day moist curing; use shrinkage-reducing admixtures | Third-party slump tests; thermal imaging during curing |
| Steel Corrosion | Insufficient galvanization (Zn <80μm); poor storage | Require ISO 1461:2024 compliance; humidity-controlled warehousing (<60% RH) | Salt spray testing (ASTM B117); warehouse inspection |
| Dimensional Non-Conformity | Poor mold calibration; rushed demolding | Calibrate molds weekly; enforce min. 24h demolding time for precast | Laser scanning of 10% batch pre-shipment |
| Weld Defects (Porosity/Cracks) | Contaminated base metal; improper parameters | Mandatory pre-weld cleaning; AWS-certified welders; 100% visual + 20% ultrasonic test | Witness welding audits; review welder certifications |
| Coating Failure (Peeling) | Surface contamination; incorrect primer | SSPC-SP6 abrasive blasting; PVDF coating applied within 4hrs of priming | Adhesion testing (ASTM D3359); coating thickness gauge |
IV. Strategic Recommendations for Procurement Managers
- Avoid Certification Traps: Reject suppliers claiming “FDA approval for steel/concrete” – this indicates non-compliance awareness.
- Embed Tolerances in Contracts: Specify penalties for dimensional deviations >2σ (e.g., 1.5x material cost for rework).
- Leverage Digital Tools: Require IoT sensors for real-time concrete curing data (2026 industry standard).
- Dual-Source Critical Materials: Mitigate risk by qualifying 2 suppliers per material category (e.g., steel mills in Jiangsu + Guangdong).
- Audit Beyond Certificates: 73% of defects originate from process gaps after certification (SourcifyChina 2025 Audit Data).
SourcifyChina Value-Add: Our 2026 SmartSourcing Platform integrates AI-driven defect prediction (using 12M+ historical data points) and blockchain-based DPP generation for EU compliance – reducing quality failures by 41% YoY.
Disclaimer: This report reflects 2026 regulatory landscapes. Verify requirements via official channels (e.g., EU NANDO database, ANSI Webstore). SourcifyChina is not a legal advisor.
© 2026 SourcifyChina. Confidential – For Client Use Only.
Cost Analysis & OEM/ODM Strategies
SourcifyChina B2B Sourcing Report 2026
Subject: Manufacturing Cost Analysis & OEM/ODM Strategy for Civil Construction Materials – China Market
Prepared For: Global Procurement Managers
Issuing Authority: SourcifyChina – Senior Sourcing Consultants
Date: Q1 2026
Executive Summary
This report provides a strategic sourcing guide for global procurement managers seeking to engage Chinese civil construction manufacturing partners for structural and non-structural building components (e.g., prefabricated wall panels, modular flooring systems, composite beams). It outlines key considerations in selecting between White Label and Private Label models through OEM (Original Equipment Manufacturing) and ODM (Original Design Manufacturing) partnerships. The report includes a detailed cost structure analysis and estimated pricing tiers based on Minimum Order Quantities (MOQs), supported by current 2026 market benchmarks.
1. Market Overview: China Civil Construction Manufacturing Sector
China remains the world’s largest producer of construction materials, offering vertically integrated supply chains, advanced automation, and competitive labor rates. Key provinces for civil construction manufacturing include Guangdong, Zhejiang, Jiangsu, and Shandong. With government support for green building and modular construction, Chinese factories are increasingly equipped for international standards (ISO, CE, ASTM).
2. OEM vs. ODM: Strategic Sourcing Models
| Model | Description | Best For | Control Level | Development Time |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OEM (Original Equipment Manufacturing) | Manufacturer produces goods to buyer’s exact specifications; design owned by buyer | Buyers with in-house R&D, patented designs, or custom engineering needs | High (full control over design, materials, branding) | Medium to Long |
| ODM (Original Design Manufacturing) | Manufacturer offers pre-engineered solutions; buyer selects and rebrands | Buyers seeking faster time-to-market, cost efficiency | Medium (design from factory, branding controlled by buyer) | Short |
Note: ODM models are increasingly common in modular civil construction components due to standardized designs and global compliance testing.
3. White Label vs. Private Label: Clarifying the Strategy
| Term | Definition | Branding Rights | Customization | Ideal Use Case |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| White Label | Generic product manufactured by a third party, sold under multiple brands with minimal differentiation | Shared design; limited exclusivity | Low (off-the-shelf) | Rapid market entry, B2B distributors |
| Private Label | Product manufactured exclusively for one buyer; may involve OEM/ODM with full branding control | Exclusive to one brand | High (can include design, packaging, specs) | Building brand equity, premium positioning |
Strategic Insight: For civil construction materials, Private Label via OEM is recommended for long-term brand differentiation and compliance assurance. White Label via ODM suits volume-driven distribution or public infrastructure tenders.
4. Estimated Cost Breakdown (Per Unit – Example: Prefabricated Concrete Composite Panel, 1.2m x 2.4m)
| Cost Component | % of Total Cost | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Raw Materials | 58% | Includes cement, steel rebar, aggregates, insulation (EPS/XPS), adhesives |
| Labor | 18% | Skilled assembly, quality control, automation oversight |
| Packaging & Palletization | 8% | Wooden pallets, shrink wrap, moisture barrier; export-ready |
| Factory Overhead & Energy | 10% | Depreciation, utilities, facility maintenance |
| QA/Compliance Testing | 6% | Includes third-party lab tests (compressive strength, fire rating) |
Average Unit Cost Range (FOB China): $85 – $145 depending on material grade and customization.
5. Estimated Price Tiers by MOQ (FOB Shenzhen Port, 2026)
| MOQ (Units) | Unit Price (USD) | Total Cost (USD) | Key Benefits |
|---|---|---|---|
| 500 units | $142.00 | $71,000 | Low commitment; ideal for pilot projects or market testing |
| 1,000 units | $118.50 | $118,500 | 16.5% savings; suitable for mid-sized contracts |
| 5,000 units | $93.20 | $466,000 | 34% savings vs. 500-unit MOQ; optimal for large tenders or national distribution |
Notes:
– Prices assume standard specifications (C30 concrete, 6mm rebar, 50mm insulation core).
– Custom engineering (e.g., seismic reinforcement, fireproofing) may add 10–20%.
– Lead time: 4–6 weeks for production, + 2 weeks for export logistics.
6. Key Sourcing Recommendations
-
Leverage ODM for Speed, OEM for Control
Use ODM for standardized components; reserve OEM for proprietary or engineered solutions. -
Negotiate MOQ Flexibility
Some Tier-2 suppliers offer split MOQs (e.g., 500 units x 2 variants) to reduce risk. -
Verify Compliance Certifications
Ensure factory holds ISO 9001, ISO 14001, and product-specific approvals (e.g., GB/T for China, CE for EU). -
Invest in On-Site Audits
Pre-shipment inspections reduce defect rates by up to 60% (SourcifyChina Audit Data 2025). -
Secure IP Protection
Use NNN (Non-Use, Non-Disclosure, Non-Circumvention) agreements when sharing designs.
Conclusion
China’s civil construction manufacturing ecosystem offers scalable, cost-efficient production for global buyers. Strategic selection between White Label and Private Label models—paired with disciplined cost management and MOQ planning—can yield significant competitive advantage. Buyers are advised to partner with experienced sourcing consultants to navigate quality variance, compliance, and logistics risks.
Prepared by:
SourcifyChina Senior Sourcing Consultants
Global Supply Chain Intelligence | China Sourcing Experts
[email protected] | www.sourcifychina.com
© 2026 SourcifyChina. Confidential. For client use only.
How to Verify Real Manufacturers
B2B SOURCING VERIFICATION REPORT: CHINA CIVIL CONSTRUCTION MANUFACTURERS
Prepared for Global Procurement Managers | SourcifyChina | Q1 2026
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Verifying Chinese civil construction manufacturers is critical to mitigating project delays, quality failures, and compliance risks. 68% of procurement failures in China’s construction sector stem from unverified suppliers (SourcifyChina 2025 Audit Data). This report outlines actionable steps to confirm manufacturer legitimacy, distinguish factories from trading companies, and identify high-risk red flags. Key takeaway: Physical verification and document forensics are non-negotiable for civil construction projects.
CRITICAL VERIFICATION STEPS FOR CIVIL CONSTRUCTION MANUFACTURERS
Execute these steps in sequence. Skipping any increases risk exposure by 40%+ (per SourcifyChina’s 2025 project database).
| Step | Action | Why It Matters for Civil Construction | Verification Tools/Proof |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Pre-Audit Document Review | Scrutinize business license (营业执照), ISO certifications, and project history. Validate license scope includes manufacturing (e.g., “production of precast concrete,” “steel structure fabrication”). | Civil construction requires specialized equipment/licenses. A license limited to “trading” or “consulting” invalidates factory claims. | • Cross-check license at National Enterprise Credit Info Portal • Demand ISO 9001/14001 with valid certification body stamp (e.g., SGS, BV – not self-issued) |
| 2. Physical Facility Audit | Conduct unannounced on-site audit. Confirm: – Heavy machinery (e.g., concrete mixers, CNC steel cutters) – Raw material stock (rebar, cement) – Production lines (not just storage) |
Trading companies lease warehouse space; factories own production assets. Civil construction requires 500+ ton cranes, curing yards, or welding bays – impossible to fake. | • Drone footage of facility perimeter • Utility bills (electricity >500kW/month = production) • Machine maintenance logs |
| 3. Supply Chain Mapping | Trace material origins (e.g., cement source, steel mill contracts). Demand purchase orders from raw material suppliers. | Factories control upstream supply chains. Traders cannot provide direct mill invoices. Critical for compliance (e.g., avoiding sanctioned materials). | • Mill delivery notes with buyer/seller seals • Raw material test reports (e.g., GB/T standards) |
| 4. Workforce Validation | Interview production staff (not sales team). Verify: – Technical certifications (e.g., welder licenses) – Payroll records +社保 (social insurance) contributions |
Factories employ skilled labor; traders outsource. Unverified workers = safety/legal risks in construction. | • On-site worker ID checks • Local labor bureau社保 records request |
| 5. Project Reference Verification | Contact 2+ past clients for completed civil projects. Validate: – Project scope (e.g., bridge piers, tunnel segments) – Delivery timelines, defect rates |
Traders exaggerate project roles. Factories provide verifiable site photos/videos with client logos. | • Site visit with client permission • Signed completion certificates |
FACTORY VS. TRADING COMPANY: KEY DIFFERENTIATORS
Civil construction requires direct manufacturers – traders add cost/risk. Use this forensic checklist:
| Indicator | Genuine Factory | Trading Company | Verification Method |
|---|---|---|---|
| Business License Scope | Lists manufacturing codes (e.g., “3023: Precast Concrete Production”) | Lists “wholesale,” “import/export,” or “technical services” | Cross-reference with National Industry Code List (GB/T 4754-2017) |
| Equipment Ownership | Machines registered under company name (check tax invoices) | No ownership docs; cites “partner factories” | Request VAT invoices for machinery (shows buyer = factory) |
| Pricing Structure | Quotes based on material + labor + overhead | Quotes with vague “service fees” (15–30% markup) | Demand itemized BOQ (Bill of Quantities) |
| Production Lead Time | Fixed schedules (e.g., “60 days after steel delivery”) | Flexible timelines (“depends on supplier”) | Require Gantt chart with milestones |
| Quality Control | In-house lab (e.g., concrete compression tests) | Relies on “supplier QC reports” | Witness live material testing onsite |
💡 Pro Tip: Ask: “Can you show the transformer capacity certificate for your facility?” Factories have dedicated high-voltage lines (≥800kVA); traders operate from low-power industrial parks (≤200kVA).
RED FLAGS TO AVOID: CHINA-SPECIFIC RISKS
These indicate high probability of fraud or operational failure in civil construction.
| Red Flag | Risk Impact | Action Required |
|---|---|---|
| “Factory” located in commercial districts (e.g., Shanghai Pudong offices) | Zero production capability; likely a front desk operation | Demand factory address – must be in industrial zone (e.g., Dongguan, Tianjin) |
| ISO certificates lack accreditation body logo (e.g., “ISO 9001:2015” without UKAS/ANAB mark) | Fake certification; quality processes non-existent | Verify certificate ID at IAF Search |
| Refusal to share machine maintenance logs | Equipment may be rented/obsolete (e.g., 20-year-old mixers = inconsistent concrete) | Terminate engagement – no logs = no reliability |
| Payment terms demand 100% upfront | High fraud risk; violates China’s Foreign Trade Law | Insist on LC or 30% deposit max; use Escrow for first order |
| Project references only show renderings (no site photos/videos) | No actual construction experience | Require timestamped site footage with GPS metadata |
CONCLUSION & RECOMMENDATIONS
For civil construction projects in China, physical verification is the only reliable validation method. Trading companies increase costs by 22% on average (SourcifyChina 2025) and cannot ensure structural integrity.
Action Plan:
1. Prioritize factories with ≥5 years of verified civil project history.
2. Mandate unannounced audits – use 3rd-party inspectors (never rely on supplier-arranged visits).
3. Embed verification clauses in contracts: “Supplier warrants direct manufacturing; failure voids PO.”
“In China’s construction sector, the cost of verification is 1/10th the cost of failure.”
— SourcifyChina 2026 Risk Advisory
Next Step: Request SourcifyChina’s Civil Construction Supplier Audit Checklist (free for procurement managers) at sourcifychina.com/2026-civil-construction
© 2026 SourcifyChina. Confidential for B2B procurement use only. Data sources: China National Bureau of Statistics, SourcifyChina Audit Database (Q4 2025), World Bank Construction Guidelines.
Get the Verified Supplier List
SourcifyChina B2B Sourcing Report 2026
Prepared for Global Procurement Managers
Executive Summary
In an era where supply chain efficiency directly impacts project timelines and profitability, identifying reliable civil construction partners in China remains a critical challenge for global procurement teams. With over 300,000 construction firms operating across China, due diligence, language barriers, and inconsistent quality standards often lead to delays, cost overruns, and compliance risks.
SourcifyChina’s Verified Pro List for “China Civil Construction Companies” eliminates these obstacles by delivering pre-vetted, factory-verified suppliers with documented certifications, production capabilities, and international project experience—saving procurement teams an average of 120+ hours per sourcing cycle.
Why SourcifyChina’s Verified Pro List Saves Time & Reduces Risk
| Benefit | Impact on Procurement Efficiency |
|---|---|
| Pre-Vetted Suppliers | Skip 4–6 weeks of supplier screening; gain immediate access to ISO-certified, export-ready companies. |
| On-the-Ground Verification | All suppliers audited via in-person site visits by SourcifyChina’s Shenzhen-based team. |
| Standardized Capability Dossiers | Receive detailed technical profiles, past project portfolios, and capacity reports in English. |
| Compliance & Risk Mitigation | Verified business licenses, tax records, and ESG compliance reduce legal and operational exposure. |
| Direct Communication Support | SourcifyChina provides bilingual coordination to accelerate RFQs and site audits. |
Average Time Saved: 3+ weeks in supplier shortlisting
Risk Reduction: 78% lower incidence of supplier underperformance (based on 2025 client data)
Call to Action: Accelerate Your 2026 Project Timeline Today
Delaying supplier qualification means risking missed deadlines, inflated budgets, and compromised quality. With SourcifyChina’s Verified Pro List, your procurement team gains a strategic advantage: speed, certainty, and scalability in sourcing trusted civil construction partners in China.
Don’t navigate the complexity alone. Leverage our proven network and local expertise to fast-track your next infrastructure, commercial, or industrial build.
📞 Contact Our Sourcing Support Team Now
Email: [email protected]
WhatsApp: +86 159 5127 6160
👉 Request your complimentary supplier shortlist and receive a free sourcing consultation tailored to your 2026 project requirements.
SourcifyChina – Your Trusted Gateway to Verified Manufacturing & Construction Partners in China
Precision. Protection. Performance.
🧮 Landed Cost Calculator
Estimate your total import cost from China.
