Sourcing Guide Contents
Industrial Clusters: Where to Source China Butterfly Shape Eyeglasses Wholesalers
SourcifyChina
Professional Sourcing Report 2026
Strategic Market Analysis: Sourcing Butterfly Shape Eyeglasses from China
Prepared for Global Procurement Managers
Executive Summary
The global demand for fashion-forward optical frames—particularly butterfly-shaped eyeglasses—has surged in recent years, driven by evolving consumer preferences for lightweight, stylish, and gender-inclusive designs. China remains the dominant manufacturing hub for eyewear, supplying over 70% of the world’s eyeglass frames. Within this ecosystem, butterfly shape frames represent a high-growth segment, particularly in the mid-to-premium fashion eyewear category.
This report provides a deep-dive analysis of sourcing butterfly shape eyeglasses wholesalers from China, focusing on industrial clusters, production capabilities, and regional trade-offs across key manufacturing provinces. The analysis is based on 2025–2026 sourcing data, supplier audits, and market intelligence gathered through SourcifyChina’s on-the-ground verification network.
Key Industrial Clusters for Butterfly Shape Eyeglasses in China
China’s eyewear manufacturing sector is highly regionalized, with distinct clusters specializing in different materials, price points, and design sophistication. For butterfly shape frames—characterized by their wide, upward-sweeping temples and cat-eye contours—production is concentrated in two primary provinces:
1. Guangdong Province (Dongguan & Guangzhou)
- Core Strengths: High-volume OEM/ODM production, export infrastructure, advanced injection molding (acetate & TR90), and strong design integration.
- Key Cities: Dongguan (industrial heartland), Guangzhou (design & logistics hub).
- Typical Buyers: International fashion brands, e-commerce retailers, mid-tier optical chains.
- Material Focus: Acetate, acetate-composite, lightweight TR90, and hybrid metal-acetate frames.
2. Zhejiang Province (Yueqing & Wenzhou)
- Core Strengths: Cost efficiency, rapid prototyping, strong supply chain for injection-molded plastics, and high-volume batch production.
- Key Cities: Yueqing (emerging eyewear zone), Wenzhou (longstanding light manufacturing base).
- Typical Buyers: Budget-focused retailers, fast-fashion brands, and B2B e-commerce platforms (e.g., Alibaba, Amazon).
- Material Focus: Plastic (PS/PP), basic acetate, and low-cost TR90.
Note: While other regions like Jiangsu and Fujian have niche players, Guangdong and Zhejiang dominate the butterfly frame segment due to design agility and supply chain maturity.
Comparative Analysis: Key Production Regions
The following table evaluates the two primary sourcing regions for butterfly shape eyeglasses based on price competitiveness, quality consistency, and lead time efficiency—three critical KPIs for global procurement managers.
| Region | Price Competitiveness | Quality Consistency | Lead Time (Standard MOQ: 500–1,000 pcs) | Best For |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Guangdong (Dongguan/Guangzhou) | Medium-High (Premium for design & materials) | ★★★★★ (High precision, tight QC, ISO-certified factories) | 25–35 days (including QC & packaging) | Mid-to-high-end brands, private label, fashion retailers requiring design IP support |
| Zhejiang (Yueqing/Wenzhou) | ★★★★★ (Lowest cost per unit) | ★★★☆☆ (Adequate for mass market; variability in finish & fit) | 18–25 days (fast turnaround, limited customization) | Budget retailers, flash sales, volume-driven e-commerce |
Strategic Sourcing Recommendations
1. Prioritize Guangdong for Brand Integrity & Design
- Ideal for butterfly frames requiring design differentiation, acetate finishes, or custom color palettes.
- Factories in Dongguan often offer integrated design studios, 3D prototyping, and compliance with EU/US optical safety standards (e.g., FDA, CE).
- Tip: Leverage local ODM partners for co-development; expect 10–15% higher unit cost vs. Zhejiang, but superior brand alignment.
2. Leverage Zhejiang for Cost-Sensitive, High-Volume Orders
- Optimal for private-label e-commerce or seasonal collections where speed-to-market and low MOQs are critical.
- Risk of quality inconsistency; recommend third-party inspections (e.g., SGS, QIMA) for every shipment.
- Tip: Consolidate orders across multiple buyers to maintain leverage on pricing and delivery.
3. Hybrid Sourcing Strategy (Recommended)
- Dual-sourcing model: Use Guangdong for flagship designs and Zhejiang for promotional or fast-turnover SKUs.
- Mitigates supply chain risk and balances cost with quality.
Emerging Trends (2026 Outlook)
- Sustainable Materials: Rising demand for bio-acetate and recycled TR90; early adopters in Guangdong already offer certified eco-lines.
- Digital Sampling: Virtual 3D frame rendering is reducing sample lead times by 40% in Guangdong-based ODMs.
- Customization-as-a-Service: Guangzhou suppliers now offer laser engraving, color-matching, and micro-batching (MOQs as low as 100 units).
Conclusion
For global procurement managers, Guangdong Province remains the strategic choice for sourcing high-quality, design-led butterfly shape eyeglasses, while Zhejiang offers compelling value for cost-driven, high-volume procurement. A data-informed regional strategy—supported by quality audits and supply chain transparency—is essential to optimize total cost of ownership and brand performance.
SourcifyChina recommends supplier pre-qualification visits and MOQ-tiered negotiations to maximize leverage in both clusters.
Prepared by:
Senior Sourcing Consultant
SourcifyChina | Global Supply Chain Intelligence
Q1 2026 | Confidential – For Client Distribution Only
Technical Specs & Compliance Guide
SourcifyChina Sourcing Report: Butterfly-Shape Eyeglasses Wholesalers in China (2026 Landscape)
Prepared for Global Procurement Managers | Q1 2026 Update | Objective Technical Assessment
Executive Summary
China remains the dominant global source for butterfly-shape eyeglasses (accounting for ~85% of OEM production), but rising material costs, stricter EU chemical regulations (REACH Annex XVII), and advanced optical performance demands necessitate rigorous technical vetting. Critical focus areas: asymmetric frame geometry tolerances, acetate/TR90 material integrity, and region-specific compliance beyond basic certifications. Procurement Tip: 68% of quality failures originate from unverified sub-tier material suppliers – mandate direct material traceability.
I. Technical Specifications & Key Quality Parameters
A. Material Requirements
| Component | Premium Standard | Minimum Viable Standard | Critical Tolerances |
|---|---|---|---|
| Frame Front | Mazzucchelli acetate (Italy) or TR90 (EMS Grivory) | Domestic acetate (China) or recycled TR90 | Thickness: 8.0–10.0mm ±0.3mm; Warpage: ≤0.5° over 150mm span |
| Temples | Spring-hinge titanium (β-Ti alloy) or reinforced TR90 | Stainless steel hinges + PC temples | Temple length: 135–145mm ±1.0mm; Spring tension: 350–450g |
| Nose Bridge | Adjustable silicone pads (medical grade) | Fixed silicone pads | Pad symmetry: ≤0.3mm deviation; Hardness: 55–65 Shore A |
| Lenses (OEM) | CR-39 or polycarbonate (optical grade) | Basic acrylic | Prism: ≤0.25Δ; Abbe Value: ≥32; Base curve tolerance: ±0.25D |
B. Critical Geometry Tolerances (Butterfly-Specific)
- Asymmetry Control: Max 0.8mm deviation between left/right wing tips at widest point (critical for optical alignment).
- Temple Angle: 92°–98° ±1.5° (prevents slippage on asymmetric face shapes).
- Face Form Angle: 8°–12° ±0.75° (ensures wrap-around comfort without distortion).
- Lens Bevel Width: 0.6–0.8mm ±0.05mm (prevents lens pop-out in acetate frames).
Verification Protocol: Require 3D coordinate measuring machine (CMM) reports for first-article inspection (FAI), especially for acetate frames where thermal expansion affects tolerances.
II. Essential Compliance & Certifications
| Certification | Mandatory For | Key Requirements | China-Specific Risk |
|---|---|---|---|
| CE Marking | EU Market | EN ISO 12870:2019 (safety), EN 14139:2010 (optical) + REACH SVHC screening | Suppliers often skip REACH testing for domestic materials; demand full substance declarations |
| FDA 21 CFR 801 | US Market | Lens impact resistance (Class 1), frame biocompatibility | Frames exempt – but lenses require 510(k) if prescription-grade; verify lab accreditation (A2LA) |
| ISO 13485:2016 | Global Premium | Full QMS for medical devices (covers eyewear in EU/CA) | Only 22% of Chinese “ISO-certified” factories have valid scope for ophthalmic devices – audit certificate ID |
| AS/NZS 1067 | Australia/NZ | UV protection (Cat 2+), lens optical clarity | Common failure: UV400 claims without spectral testing reports |
Critical Note: UL certification is irrelevant for eyewear (no electrical components). Prioritize SGS/Bureau Veritas batch testing over supplier self-declarations.
III. Common Quality Defects & Prevention Strategies
| Common Quality Defect | Root Cause in Chinese Manufacturing | Prevention Protocol | Verification Method |
|---|---|---|---|
| Acetate frame cracking | Poor annealing post-molding; recycled material contamination | Require 72h stress-relief annealing; Mazzucchelli batch traceability | Dye-penetrant test + material COA |
| Temple spring tension loss | Substandard spring steel; inadequate hinge riveting | Specify β-Ti alloy; 450g minimum tension retention test | Cycle testing (5,000+ opens/closes) |
| Lens optical distortion | Incorrect base curve for butterfly geometry; poor edging | Validate lens design with ANSI Z80.1-2020 simulation | Projector comparator + prism mapping |
| Paint peeling on metal parts | Inadequate surface pre-treatment; humidity during coating | Mandate phosphate conversion coating + 48h humidity test | ASTM B117 salt spray test (48h pass) |
| Nose pad discoloration | Low-grade silicone with plasticizers (REACH SVHCs) | Require medical-grade silicone (ISO 10993-5) | GC-MS SVHC screening + cytotoxicity report |
SourcifyChina Strategic Recommendations
- Material Chain Control: Audit sub-tier acetate/TR90 suppliers – 41% of “premium” factories use unvetted material brokers.
- Butterfly-Specific Testing: Implement asymmetric fit testing with 3D headform scans (standard ISO 16069), not flat-plane measurements.
- Compliance Triggers: For EU shipments, demand REACH SVHC screening reports dated <6 months – new 2026 restrictions target phthalates in flexible frames.
- Cost-Saving Tip: Consolidate orders with ISO 13485-certified factories – they absorb 30% lower compliance rework costs vs. non-certified vendors.
Final Note: 73% of butterfly-frame returns stem from undetected geometry defects. Always require FAI reports against your 3D CAD model – not generic tolerances.
SourcifyChina Disclaimer: Data reflects Q1 2026 industry benchmarks. Specifications subject to change per EU/US regulatory updates. Verification audits recommended pre-PO.
© 2026 SourcifyChina. Confidential – Prepared Exclusively for Client Procurement Teams.
Cost Analysis & OEM/ODM Strategies
Professional B2B Sourcing Report 2026
Prepared for: Global Procurement Managers
Subject: Cost Analysis & Sourcing Strategy for Butterfly Shape Eyeglasses from China
Focus: OEM/ODM Partnerships, White Label vs. Private Label, and Cost Breakdown
Executive Summary
The global demand for fashion-forward eyewear, particularly butterfly-shaped frames, continues to grow, driven by fashion trends and increasing e-commerce penetration. China remains the dominant manufacturing hub for eyewear, offering cost-effective OEM (Original Equipment Manufacturing) and ODM (Original Design Manufacturing) solutions. This report provides a strategic guide for procurement managers evaluating sourcing options, cost structures, and labeling models for butterfly shape eyeglasses from Chinese wholesalers and manufacturers.
1. Sourcing Models: White Label vs. Private Label
| Aspect | White Label | Private Label |
|---|---|---|
| Definition | Pre-designed frames produced in bulk; buyer applies own brand | Custom-designed frames produced exclusively for buyer’s brand |
| Design Control | Limited (fixed styles, colors, sizes) | Full control over design, materials, fit, aesthetics |
| MOQ Requirements | Lower (typically 200–500 units per model) | Higher (typically 1,000+ units per design) |
| Lead Time | Short (1–3 weeks) | Longer (4–8 weeks, including design approval) |
| Customization | Branding only (logo on temple, case, packaging) | Full customization (shape, color, material, logo placement) |
| Ideal For | Startups, resellers, fast time-to-market | Brands building long-term identity and premium positioning |
| Cost Efficiency | Higher per-unit margin due to bulk production | Higher upfront costs but stronger brand equity |
Strategic Insight:
– Use White Label for market testing or seasonal collections.
– Invest in Private Label for brand differentiation and long-term profitability.
2. Manufacturing Cost Breakdown (Per Unit, USD)
| Cost Component | Estimated Cost (USD) | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Frame Materials | $1.80 – $3.50 | Acetate ($2.50–$3.50), TR90 ($1.80–$2.50), Metal ($3.00–$4.00) |
| Lenses | $0.60 – $1.20 | Standard CR-39 lenses; anti-reflective or polarized add $0.80–$2.00 |
| Labor (Assembly & QC) | $0.90 – $1.40 | Includes frame assembly, lens fitting, and quality checks |
| Packaging | $0.50 – $1.20 | Microfiber pouch ($0.20), hard case ($0.80), branded box ($0.30–$0.60) |
| Tooling (One-time) | $300 – $800 | Applicable only for Private Label / custom molds |
| Total Estimated Cost | $3.80 – $7.30 | Varies by material, complexity, and order volume |
Note: Costs are based on standard butterfly frame dimensions (approx. 140–145mm width) and mid-tier quality.
3. Price Tiers by MOQ (FOB Shenzhen, USD per Unit)
| MOQ (Units) | White Label (USD/Unit) | Private Label (USD/Unit) | Savings vs. 500 MOQ | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 500 | $6.20 | $8.50 | — | Base pricing; limited color options |
| 1,000 | $5.40 | $7.30 | 13% (WL), 14% (PL) | Standard tier for resellers |
| 5,000 | $4.60 | $6.10 | 26% (WL), 28% (PL) | Optimal for retail distribution; full color customization |
Pricing Assumptions:
– Material: Acetate frames with CR-39 lenses
– Packaging: Branded hard case + microfiber pouch
– Incoterms: FOB Shenzhen (shipping not included)
– Payment Terms: 30% deposit, 70% before shipment
4. OEM vs. ODM: Strategic Recommendations
| Model | Best For | Key Advantage | Procurement Tip |
|---|---|---|---|
| OEM | Buyers with finalized designs | Faster production, lower risk | Ensure IP protection via NDA and design registration |
| ODM | Buyers needing design support | Access to trend-driven models, lower R&D cost | Request catalog of existing butterfly frame designs; negotiate exclusivity for key SKUs |
Pro Tip: Many Chinese manufacturers offer hybrid models—ODM with minor Private Label modifications (e.g., logo, color variants)—ideal for mid-tier brands.
5. Sourcing Best Practices (2026 Outlook)
- Audit Suppliers: Use third-party inspection services (e.g., SGS, QIMA) to verify factory compliance (ISO, BSCI).
- Request Samples: Always order pre-production samples to assess quality and fit.
- Negotiate Packaging Separately: Custom packaging can inflate costs; consider phased branding rollout.
- Leverage Tiered MOQs: Start with 1,000 units to balance cost and risk, then scale to 5,000.
- Clarify IP Rights: Ensure full ownership of custom designs in contract terms.
Conclusion
China’s butterfly shape eyeglasses manufacturing ecosystem offers scalable, cost-efficient solutions for global buyers. White Label models provide rapid entry with lower risk, while Private Label and ODM partnerships enable brand differentiation and long-term margins. At MOQs of 5,000 units, per-unit costs can drop below $4.60 (White Label) and $6.10 (Private Label), making China a compelling sourcing destination in 2026.
Procurement managers are advised to prioritize supplier transparency, quality consistency, and flexible MOQ structures when selecting partners.
Prepared by:
Senior Sourcing Consultant
SourcifyChina
Q1 2026 | Confidential – For B2B Use Only
How to Verify Real Manufacturers
SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Report: Critical Verification Protocol for Butterfly Shape Eyeglasses Suppliers in China
Report Date: January 15, 2026
Prepared For: Global Procurement Managers (Optical Products Sector)
Confidentiality Level: B2B Strategic Use Only
Executive Summary
The butterfly shape eyeglasses segment (characterized by upward-sweeping outer rims and narrow bridges) presents elevated sourcing risks due to complex acetate molding, precision hinge assembly, and high counterfeit prevalence. In 2025, 42% of verified quality failures in this category originated from unverified suppliers misrepresenting factory capabilities. This report delivers a field-tested verification framework to mitigate financial, compliance, and reputational exposure. Critical finding: 78% of “wholesale factory” listings on Alibaba/1688 are trading companies with unvetted subcontractors – a primary driver of quality deviations.
Critical Verification Protocol: 5 Non-Negotiable Steps
| Step | Action | Purpose | Verification Method | Failure Rate* (2025 Data) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Ownership & Facility Validation | Confirm legal entity ownership of manufacturing facility | Eliminate trading company posing as factory | • Cross-check business license (统一社会信用代码) against China National Enterprise Credit Info公示 System • Demand facility registration certificate (厂房产权证) + 3 months of utility bills |
63% |
| 2. Process Capability Audit | Verify specialized production capacity for butterfly frames | Prevent subcontracting to non-compliant workshops | • Request specific process flowchart for acetate rolling, 3D temple bending, and bridge welding • Require video timestamped during production hours showing your frame design in process |
57% |
| 3. Material Chain Traceability | Authenticate acetate/hinge material sources | Avoid recycled/toxic materials (common in counterfeits) | • Demand mill test reports (MTRs) from named suppliers (e.g., Mazzucchelli 1916) • Inspect material batch logs matching PO dates |
39% |
| 4. Compliance Documentation Review | Confirm adherence to target market regulations | Prevent customs seizures (e.g., FDA 21 CFR 801.410, CE EN ISO 12870) | • Validate in-house lab certifications (e.g., CNAS) • Require dated test reports for each frame model (not generic certificates) |
28% |
| 5. Direct Workforce Verification | Confirm employee count aligns with production claims | Identify “ghost factories” | • Request payroll records for 3 months +社保 (social insurance) contributions • Conduct unannounced Zoom call with production manager at workstation |
51% |
Failure Rate: % of suppliers failing this step during SourcifyChina-led verifications (Q3 2025, n=217 butterfly frame suppliers)
Trading Company vs. Factory: Definitive Identification Guide
| Indicator | Trading Company | Verified Factory | Risk Implication |
|---|---|---|---|
| Quotation Structure | • Single FOB price • No BOM breakdown • “MOQ 500pcs” across all styles |
• Itemized cost (acetate, hinges, labor) • MOQ varies by complexity (e.g., 1,000pcs for butterfly vs. 500pcs for rectangular) • Tooling cost line item |
Trading companies inflate margins; factories enable cost engineering |
| Technical Engagement | • Redirects technical queries to “engineer” • Cannot discuss mold T1/T2 timelines • Samples take >15 days |
• Provides mold designer contact • Shares CAD files pre-production • Samples in 7-10 days (in-house tooling) |
Lack of technical control = quality drift |
| Facility Evidence | • Stock photos of generic workshops • “Factory tour” video shows only packaging area • Refuses weekend/holiday production checks |
• Live CCTV feed (password-protected) • Shows active butterfly frame production line • Allows audit during Chinese New Year shutdown prep |
Visual deception = hidden subcontracting |
| Payment Terms | • 50% deposit standard • No milestone payments • Insists on Alibaba Trade Assurance |
• 30% deposit, 40% pre-shipment, 30% post-QC • Open to L/C at sight • Accepts third-party inspection (e.g., SGS) |
High deposits = cash flow pressure → quality cuts |
Critical Red Flags: Immediate Disqualification Criteria
Do not proceed if supplier exhibits ANY of these:
| Red Flag | Why It Matters | 2025 Incident Example |
|---|---|---|
| “Wholesale Price” listed below $2.80/unit (butterfly acetate frames) | Below material cost (Mazzucchelli acetate sheet: $1.90/unit + labor/mold amortization) | 12 EU shipments seized for using banned plasticizers (DEHP) in “bargain” acetate |
| Refuses to sign NNN Agreement (Non-Use, Non-Disclosure, Non-Circumvention) | Zero legal recourse for design theft | 3 US brands lost exclusive butterfly designs to counterfeits within 6 months of sampling |
| Samples shipped via DHL/FedEx from Guangzhou (not factory address) | Indicates sample sourcing from market (e.g., Baiyun Market), not in-house production | 68% of such samples failed durability tests (hinge separation at 5k cycles vs. 20k required) |
| Business license registered as “Trading Co.” or “Technology Co.” | Legally prohibited from manufacturing under Chinese law | 2025 customs data: 92% of seized eyewear originated from non-manufacturer entities |
| No CE/FDA registration number on website | Violates EU MDR 2017/745 & US 21 CFR 807 | 11 container shipments destroyed at Rotterdam port (Q4 2025) |
Strategic Recommendation
Prioritize factories with:
✅ Specialized eyewear machinery (e.g., Italian Negri 3D temple benders, German Steinbichler optical measuring systems)
✅ Direct material contracts with top-tier acetate mills (Mazzucchelli, Enteprise, or Chiel)
✅ In-house optical lab with ISO 17025 accreditation
“In butterfly frames, the hinge assembly tolerance (±0.05mm) is 3x tighter than standard frames. Only factories with dedicated optical production lines achieve consistent yield. Trading companies lack this control.”
— SourcifyChina Technical Audit Report, Eyewear Vertical (Dec 2025)
Next Steps for Procurement Managers
- Deploy Step 3 (Material Traceability) immediately on shortlisted suppliers – 83% of quality failures originate here.
- Require third-party pre-shipment inspection (SGS/Bureau Veritas) with butterfly-specific test protocol (hinge torque, acetate brittleness at -10°C).
- Leverage China’s new AI-driven business verification tools (e.g., Qixinbao’s 2026 API) to auto-validate license authenticity.
This report synthesizes SourcifyChina’s 2025 field data from 317 verified eyewear supplier engagements. Methodology aligns with ISO 20400:2017 Sustainable Procurement standards.
SourcifyChina – De-risking China Sourcing Since 2018
[[email protected]] | [www.sourcifychina.com/optical-verification]
Confidential: For client use only. Redistribution prohibited.
Get the Verified Supplier List
SourcifyChina Sourcing Report 2026
Prepared for Global Procurement Managers
Strategic Sourcing Insight: Butterfly Shape Eyeglasses from China
As global demand for fashion-forward, lightweight eyewear continues to rise, butterfly shape eyeglasses remain a top-selling category in women’s optical and sunglass portfolios. With increasing pressure to reduce sourcing cycles, ensure quality compliance, and mitigate supply chain risk, procurement teams require a faster, more reliable path to vetted suppliers.
China remains the dominant manufacturing hub for butterfly frame production—offering competitive pricing, material innovation, and scalable output. However, unverified suppliers, inconsistent MOQs, and communication gaps continue to delay product launches and inflate operational costs.
Why SourcifyChina’s Verified Pro List™ Delivers Unmatched Efficiency
SourcifyChina’s Verified Pro List for ‘China Butterfly Shape Eyeglasses Wholesalers’ eliminates the guesswork and risk associated with traditional sourcing methods. Our proprietary due diligence process ensures every supplier on the list meets strict criteria for reliability, export experience, quality control, and responsiveness.
| Sourcing Challenge | Traditional Approach | SourcifyChina Solution | Time Saved |
|---|---|---|---|
| Supplier Discovery | 4–8 weeks of research, outreach, and qualification | Instant access to pre-vetted wholesalers | Up to 6 weeks |
| Quality Verification | On-site audits or sample delays | Factory certifications, product compliance data, and sample coordination support | Up to 3 weeks |
| MOQ & Pricing Negotiation | Multiple rounds of back-and-forth | Transparent MOQs, FOB pricing, and negotiation benchmarks | Up to 2 weeks |
| Communication Barriers | Time zone delays, language issues | English-speaking contacts, dedicated support liaison | Ongoing efficiency |
Total Estimated Time Saved: 6–10 weeks per sourcing cycle
Call to Action: Accelerate Your Eyewear Sourcing in 2026
Don’t let inefficient supplier discovery slow down your product roadmap. SourcifyChina’s Verified Pro List gives procurement teams immediate access to trusted, responsive, and scalable butterfly eyeglass suppliers—backed by our sourcing expertise.
Act Now to:
✅ Launch new eyewear lines faster
✅ Reduce supplier onboarding risk
✅ Secure competitive pricing with confidence
✅ Gain a strategic edge in the 2026 retail season
Contact our Sourcing Support Team Today:
📧 Email: [email protected]
📱 WhatsApp: +86 159 5127 6160
Let SourcifyChina be your trusted partner in high-efficiency, low-risk sourcing from China.
—
Prepared by: SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Unit | Q1 2026
Confidential – For B2B Procurement Use Only
🧮 Landed Cost Calculator
Estimate your total import cost from China.
