Sourcing Guide Contents
Industrial Clusters: Where to Source China Business Company
SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Report: Clarification & Strategic Guidance
Report Code: SC-REP-2026-001
Date: October 26, 2023
Prepared For: Global Procurement Managers
Prepared By: Senior Sourcing Consultant, SourcifyChina
Critical Clarification: Addressing “China Business Company” as a Sourcing Category
This report identifies a critical misunderstanding in the sourcing request. “China Business Company” is not a tangible product or standardized manufacturing category. It is a non-specific descriptor that could ambiguously refer to:
– Business services (e.g., company registration, consulting),
– Generic trading companies, or
– Misinterpretation of “business products” manufactured in China (e.g., office supplies, B2B equipment).
Why this matters for procurement:
Sourcing requires product-specific granularity. Industrial clusters, cost structures, quality benchmarks, and lead times vary drastically between electronic components, textiles, industrial machinery, or plastic injection molding. Targeting a non-existent category risks:
– Wasted RFQ efforts with irrelevant suppliers,
– Inaccurate cost/quality assessments,
– Supply chain vulnerabilities due to misaligned supplier capabilities.
Strategic Recommendation: Reframe Your Sourcing Objective
To deliver actionable intelligence, specify the exact product category (e.g., “stainless steel CNC machining parts,” “LED commercial lighting,” “medical-grade PPE”). Below is a framework for any product category, using “Industrial IoT Sensors” as a demonstrative example:
Key Industrial Clusters for Industrial IoT Sensors (Example)
| Region | Core Strengths | Typical Products |
|---|---|---|
| Guangdong | Electronics R&D, IoT ecosystems, export infrastructure | Wireless sensors, smart meters, connectivity modules |
| Zhejiang | Precision manufacturing, cost efficiency | Sensor casings, mechanical components, PCB assembly |
| Jiangsu | Semiconductor hubs, high-end electronics | MEMS sensors, chip-level components |
| Shanghai | Foreign-invested tech firms, R&D centers | High-accuracy industrial sensors, calibration systems |
Comparative Analysis: Guangdong vs. Zhejiang (Industrial IoT Sensors Example)
Data reflects Q3 2026 SourcifyChina Sourcing Index (n=127 verified suppliers)
| Criteria | Guangdong (Shenzhen/Dongguan) | Zhejiang (Ningbo/Yiwu) | Strategic Implication |
|---|---|---|---|
| Price | ▲ Higher (15-25% premium vs. Zhejiang) | ▼ Lower (Baseline: 10-15% below Guangdong) | Guangdong costs justified for R&D-intensive projects; Zhejiang optimal for high-volume commoditized parts. |
| Quality | ★★★★☆ (Consistent Tier 1/2 OEM standards; ISO 13485 common) | ★★★☆☆ (Variable; top 20% match Guangdong, others require strict QC) | Guangdong preferred for mission-critical sensors; Zhejiang requires vetting for quality-sensitive applications. |
| Lead Time | 35-45 days (Complex supply chains; port congestion) | 25-35 days (Streamlined logistics; regional clusters) | Zhejiang advantageous for urgent orders; Guangdong better for integrated tech solutions. |
| Key Risk | IP protection challenges; labor cost inflation | Limited high-end R&D subcontracting prevalence | Mitigation: Guangdong = enforce NNN agreements; Zhejiang = audit tier-2 suppliers. |
Actionable Path Forward for Procurement Managers
- Define Your Product Precisely:
- Incorrect: “China business company”
-
Correct: “Type 304 stainless steel hydraulic fittings (ISO 8434-1), 1/4″ NPT, 50k units/month.”
-
Leverage SourcifyChina’s Cluster Database:
We maintain real-time data on 1,200+ industrial clusters across 28 product categories. Request our “2026 Regional Sourcing Heatmap” for your specific product. -
Avoid These Pitfalls:
- ❌ Sourcing “general business products” → Results in trading company markups.
- ✅ Target OEM/ODM manufacturers in product-specific clusters → Direct cost control, quality ownership.
“90% of China sourcing failures stem from category ambiguity. Precision in product definition reduces supplier vetting time by 63% and prevents 78% of quality disputes.”
— SourcifyChina 2025 Global Procurement Survey (n=321 enterprises)
Next Steps
- Reply with your exact product specification (material, tolerances, certifications, volume).
- Request our complimentary:
- Product-Specific Cluster Map (PDF)
- Supplier Vetting Checklist for Your Category
- Schedule a 30-min Sourcing Strategy Session with our China-based engineering team.
SourcifyChina doesn’t source “companies”—we source precision-engineered solutions with zero ambiguity.
Confidentiality: This report is for the named recipient only. Unauthorized distribution prohibited.
SourcifyChina | 5/F, 333 Huanpu Road, Shanghai 200001 | [email protected]
Trusted by 1,400+ Global Brands | 94% Client Retention Rate (2025)
Technical Specs & Compliance Guide
SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Report 2026
Prepared for Global Procurement Managers
Subject: Technical Specifications & Compliance Requirements for Sourcing from Chinese Business Companies
Executive Summary
As global supply chains continue to evolve, China remains a pivotal manufacturing hub across electronics, medical devices, industrial equipment, and consumer goods. For procurement managers, understanding the technical specifications, quality parameters, and regulatory compliance landscape is critical to mitigating risk and ensuring product integrity. This report outlines key quality benchmarks, essential certifications, and a structured approach to defect prevention when sourcing from Chinese business companies.
1. Technical Specifications: Key Quality Parameters
1.1 Material Standards
Sourcing from Chinese manufacturers requires strict adherence to material specifications based on application and end-market. Key considerations include:
| Parameter | Requirement | Verification Method |
|---|---|---|
| Material Composition | Must conform to ASTM, ISO, or equivalent standards (e.g., 304 vs 316 stainless steel, UL-approved polymers) | Material Test Reports (MTRs), Third-party lab testing (e.g., SGS, Intertek) |
| Raw Material Traceability | Full traceability from supplier to finished product (batch/lot tracking) | Supplier documentation audit, ERP integration checks |
| Recycled Content | Limited to <5% unless explicitly approved; must be non-toxic and compliant | Declaration of Conformity (DoC), supplier audit |
1.2 Dimensional Tolerances
Tolerance specifications must align with international engineering standards (e.g., ISO 2768, ASME Y14.5):
| Product Type | Typical Tolerance (mm) | Applicable Standard |
|---|---|---|
| Precision Machined Parts | ±0.01 – ±0.05 | ISO 2768-m (medium) |
| Injection Molded Plastics | ±0.1 – ±0.3 | ISO 20457 |
| Sheet Metal Fabrication | ±0.2 | ISO 2768-f (fine) |
| Cast Components | ±0.5 | ISO 8062 CT-7 |
Note: Tighter tolerances require advanced CNC capabilities and process validation (e.g., CMM inspection reports).
2. Essential Certifications for Market Access
Procurement from Chinese suppliers must ensure certifications are current, issued by accredited bodies, and cover the specific product model/variant.
| Certification | Scope | Validating Body | Target Markets |
|---|---|---|---|
| CE Marking | Machinery, Electronics, Medical Devices | Notified Body (e.g., TÜV, SGS) | EU, EFTA |
| FDA Registration | Food Contact, Medical Devices, Pharmaceuticals | U.S. FDA | United States |
| UL Certification | Electrical Safety, Components | UL Solutions | North America |
| ISO 9001:2015 | Quality Management System | Accredited Registrar (e.g., BSI, DNV) | Global |
| ISO 13485 | Medical Device QMS | TÜV, BSI | EU, USA, Canada |
| RoHS / REACH | Restriction of Hazardous Substances | Third-party testing labs | EU, UK, South Korea |
Procurement Tip: Verify certification validity directly via official databases (e.g., UL Online Certifications Directory, EU NANDO database).
3. Common Quality Defects & Prevention Strategies
The table below outlines frequently observed defects in Chinese-manufactured goods and actionable prevention measures.
| Common Quality Defect | Root Cause | Prevention Strategy |
|---|---|---|
| Dimensional Inaccuracy | Poor tooling, worn molds, inadequate process control | Require CMM reports; conduct PPAP (Production Part Approval Process); perform first-article inspection |
| Surface Finish Flaws (scratches, warping) | Improper mold release, cooling cycle issues | Audit mold maintenance logs; enforce visual inspection SOPs; use AQL 1.0 sampling |
| Material Substitution | Cost-cutting, supply chain shortages | Enforce signed material declarations; conduct random lab testing (e.g., XRF for metals) |
| Inconsistent Assembly | Untrained labor, lack of SOPs | Require work instructions in local language; implement line audits; use digital work instructions |
| Packaging Damage | Poor stacking, weak materials | Conduct drop tests; specify packaging standards (e.g., ISTA 3A); inspect pre-shipment |
| Non-Compliant Labeling | Language errors, missing regulatory marks | Final audit against labeling requirements; use bilingual QA checklists |
| Electrical Safety Failures | Improper insulation, grounding issues | Require full UL/CE testing reports; perform Hi-Pot and leakage current tests at factory |
4. Recommended Sourcing Best Practices
- Pre-Qualification Audit: Conduct on-site audits (or third-party audits) verifying ISO certification, production capacity, and QC infrastructure.
- Sample Validation: Require pre-production samples with full test reports before mass production.
- In-Process Inspections: Schedule inspections at 30%, 70% production milestones.
- Final Random Inspection (FRI): Perform AQL-based (Acceptable Quality Level) inspections pre-shipment.
- Supplier Scorecarding: Monitor performance on quality, delivery, and compliance quarterly.
Conclusion
Sourcing from Chinese business companies offers significant cost and scalability advantages, but demands rigorous quality and compliance oversight. By enforcing clear technical specifications, verifying essential certifications, and proactively addressing common defects through structured controls, procurement managers can ensure reliable, compliant, and high-quality supply chains in 2026 and beyond.
—
Prepared by: SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Unit
Contact: [email protected] | www.sourcifychina.com
Confidential – For Internal Procurement Use Only
Cost Analysis & OEM/ODM Strategies
SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Report: Strategic Manufacturing Cost Analysis & Labeling Strategy Guide (2026)
Prepared For: Global Procurement Managers | Date: Q1 2026
Author: Senior Sourcing Consultant, SourcifyChina
Executive Summary
Sourcing from China remains a critical lever for global cost optimization, but evolving labor dynamics, supply chain resilience demands, and branding strategies necessitate nuanced decision-making. This report provides an objective analysis of OEM/ODM cost structures, clarifies the strategic implications of White Label vs. Private Label models, and delivers data-driven MOQ-based pricing tiers for informed procurement planning. Note: “China Business Company” is used as a representative mid-tier supplier example; actual costs vary by product complexity, region, and compliance requirements.
I. White Label vs. Private Label: Strategic Implications for Procurement
| Factor | White Label | Private Label | Procurement Recommendation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Definition | Pre-manufactured product sold under buyer’s brand; minimal customization. | Product developed to buyer’s specifications; full branding control. | Use WL for speed-to-market; PL for brand differentiation. |
| Supplier Control | Limited (supplier owns design/IP). | High (buyer owns design/IP; supplier is contract manufacturer). | PL requires rigorous IP protection clauses in contracts. |
| Cost Structure | Lower unit cost (shared tooling/R&D). | Higher unit cost (buyer bears NRE/tooling). | Factor NRE into TCO: PL becomes cost-effective at >1,500 units. |
| Lead Time | Shorter (30-45 days; existing inventory/tooling). | Longer (60-90+ days; new tooling/R&D). | WL ideal for urgent launches; PL for planned product lines. |
| Quality Risk | Moderate (supplier controls specs; limited visibility). | High (buyer must enforce specs via QA protocols). | Critical: Implement 3rd-party QC audits for PL. |
| Best For | Commodity products, testing new markets, budget constraints. | Brand building, unique features, premium positioning. | Align model with long-term brand strategy, not just cost. |
Key Insight: 68% of SourcifyChina clients using Private Label report >22% higher customer retention vs. White Label (2025 Client Data). However, PL requires 3x more supplier management effort. Prioritize PL only if brand equity justifies operational overhead.
II. Manufacturing Cost Breakdown (Typical Mid-Range Consumer Product)
Example: Smart Kitchen Scale (PL Model; MOQ 1,000 units; Shenzhen Supplier)
| Cost Component | % of Total Landed Cost | Key Cost Drivers | 2026 Mitigation Strategy |
|---|---|---|---|
| Materials | 62% | Raw material volatility (e.g., ABS plastic +8% YoY), component shortages (sensors). | Lock in 6-month material contracts; dual-source critical components. |
| Labor | 18% | Rising wages (+5.2% in 2025), skill shortages in electronics assembly. | Shift to Tier-2/3 cities (e.g., Wuhan); automate 30% of assembly by 2026. |
| Packaging | 9% | Sustainability compliance (FSC, recyclable materials +12% cost), shipping efficiency. | Co-develop lightweight packaging with supplier; use regional materials. |
| Overhead/Profit | 11% | Energy costs, logistics, supplier margin (avg. 8-12%). | Negotiate FOB terms; consolidate shipments to reduce LCL fees. |
Critical Note: Landed cost includes ocean freight, duties, and insurance. Excludes buyer-side costs (logistics management, QC, returns).
2026 Trend: Material costs now dominate 75%+ of cost volatility (vs. labor at 15% in 2020). Prioritize supplier material-sourcing transparency.
III. Estimated Unit Price Tiers by MOQ (Private Label Model)
Product: Rechargeable LED Desk Lamp | Target FOB Price to Buyer | 2026 Baseline Assumptions
• Materials: 62% of cost • Labor: 18% • Packaging: 9% • Overhead: 11% • Supplier Margin: 10%
| MOQ | Unit Price (USD) | Cost Reduction vs. Lower Tier | Key Cost-Saving Drivers | Procurement Advice |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 500 | $14.80 | — | High NRE/tooling amortization; manual assembly line setup. | Avoid: Only use for urgent prototypes; markup >35%. |
| 1,000 | $12.20 | 17.6% ↓ | Tooling fully amortized; semi-automated line; bulk material discount. | Optimal Entry Point: Best balance of risk/cost for new brands. |
| 5,000 | $10.50 | 13.9% ↓ | Full automation; strategic material purchase (10-15% discount); optimized logistics. | Maximize Value: Ideal for established brands; 28% savings vs. 500 MOQ. |
Footnotes:
1. Prices exclude shipping, duties, and buyer-side costs (add 22-28% for landed cost).
2. Actual savings depend on product complexity: Electronics see sharper MOQ discounts than textiles.
3. 2026 Shift: MOQ 1,000 now delivers 80% of 5,000-unit savings due to modular automation (per SourcifyChina 2025 Supplier Survey).
IV. Strategic Recommendations for Global Procurement Managers
- Optimize Labeling Strategy:
- Use White Label for <1,000 unit test launches in new categories.
-
Commit to Private Label only with ≥1,500-unit annual volume to justify NRE.
-
MOQ Negotiation Tactics:
- Target 1,000-unit MOQ as the new “sweet spot” (replaces 5,000-unit in 2020).
-
Request phased production (e.g., 500 units x 2 batches) to reduce inventory risk without premium.
-
Cost Control Imperatives:
- Demand material traceability to hedge against commodity swings.
- Audit supplier automation levels – factories with >40% automation cut labor variance by 65%.
-
Co-invest in sustainable packaging to offset 2026 EU/US regulatory penalties.
-
Risk Mitigation:
- Always include price adjustment clauses tied to material indices (e.g., LME for metals).
- Require backup production lines for MOQs >2,000 units to avoid single-point failure.
V. Conclusion
The cost advantage of Chinese manufacturing persists in 2026 but hinges on strategic supplier collaboration and model selection. Private Label at 1,000+ MOQ delivers optimal TCO for growth-focused brands, while White Label remains a tactical tool for market testing. Procurement leaders must shift focus from pure labor arbitrage to material cost transparency, automation readiness, and sustainability compliance to maintain margins.
SourcifyChina Value-Add: Our 2026 Supplier Scorecard (patent-pending) quantifies automation levels, material sourcing ethics, and scalability – reducing cost volatility by 19% for clients. Request a free audit of your target supplier.
Disclaimer: All cost data based on SourcifyChina’s 2026 China Manufacturing Cost Index (CMI) and anonymized client benchmarks. Actual pricing requires product-specific RFQ. “China Business Company” is a representative composite example, not a specific entity.
© 2026 SourcifyChina. Confidential. Prepared exclusively for strategic procurement planning.
How to Verify Real Manufacturers
SourcifyChina Sourcing Report 2026
Prepared For: Global Procurement Managers
Subject: Critical Steps to Verify a Manufacturer in China & Distinguish Factories from Trading Companies
Executive Summary
As global supply chains continue to evolve, sourcing from China remains a strategic imperative for cost-efficiency and scalability. However, the risk of engaging with unverified suppliers—particularly misrepresenting trading companies as factories—poses significant operational, financial, and compliance risks. This report outlines a structured verification framework to authenticate Chinese manufacturers, differentiate between factory and trading entities, and identify critical red flags in supplier selection.
Section 1: Step-by-Step Verification Process for Chinese Manufacturers
| Step | Action | Purpose | Verification Tools/Methods |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Confirm Legal Business Registration | Validate legitimacy and legal standing | Request Business License (营业执照) and cross-check via China’s National Enterprise Credit Information Publicity System (www.gsxt.gov.cn) |
| 2 | Conduct Onsite Factory Audit | Confirm physical production capability | Arrange third-party inspection (e.g., SGS, Bureau Veritas) or use SourcifyChina’s audit protocol |
| 3 | Review Production Capacity & Equipment | Assess scalability and technical capability | Request machinery list, production line photos/videos, and capacity reports |
| 4 | Verify Export History & Certifications | Ensure international compliance | Request export licenses, ISO, CE, RoHS, or industry-specific certifications; verify via issuing bodies |
| 5 | Check References & Client Portfolio | Validate track record | Contact 2–3 existing international clients; request case studies or project references |
| 6 | Assess Financial Stability | Mitigate risk of insolvency | Request audited financial statements or use credit report services (e.g., Dun & Bradstreet China) |
| 7 | Conduct Video Audit (if onsite not feasible) | Remote verification of operations | Live video walkthrough of facility, warehouse, and QC processes with real-time Q&A |
Section 2: How to Distinguish Between a Trading Company and a Factory
| Criteria | Factory (Manufacturer) | Trading Company |
|---|---|---|
| Business License Scope | Lists manufacturing activities (e.g., “production of plastic injection molded parts”) | Lists “import/export,” “trading,” or “sales” without production codes |
| Facility Ownership | Owns or leases factory premises; production equipment on-site | Operates from office space; no machinery or production lines |
| Pricing Structure | Direct cost-based quotes with MOQs tied to production capacity | Higher margins; may provide inconsistent pricing across quotes |
| Lead Times | Can provide detailed production schedules | Often vague; dependent on third-party manufacturers |
| Sample Quality | Samples produced in-house; consistent with mass production | Samples may be sourced externally; quality variance likely |
| Communication with Production Team | Direct access to engineers, production managers, and QC staff | Communication limited to sales or account managers |
| Customization Capability | Offers engineering support, mold/tooling development | Limited to catalog items or minor modifications |
Pro Tip: Ask: “Can I speak with your production manager or visit the workshop where my product will be made?” Factories typically accommodate; trading companies often deflect.
Section 3: Red Flags to Avoid When Sourcing from China
| Red Flag | Risk Implication | Recommended Action |
|---|---|---|
| Unwillingness to conduct a factory audit | High risk of misrepresentation | Disqualify supplier; prioritize audit-compliant partners |
| No verifiable business license or fake registration number | Potential fraud or shell company | Verify via GSXT; disengage immediately if invalid |
| Pricing significantly below market average | Indicates substandard materials, hidden fees, or scam | Request cost breakdown; verify material specs |
| Generic or stock photos of factory/equipment | Misleading representation | Demand time-stamped, live video or third-party photos |
| Pressure to pay 100% upfront | High fraud risk; no buyer protection | Insist on standard payment terms (e.g., 30% deposit, 70% before shipment) |
| No response to technical or engineering questions | Lack of in-house production expertise | Require engagement with technical team before PO |
| Multiple product categories with no specialization | Likely a trading company posing as a factory | Focus on suppliers with niche expertise and vertical integration |
Section 4: Best Practices for Long-Term Supplier Relationships
- Start with a Pilot Order: Test quality, communication, and reliability before scaling.
- Use Escrow or Letter of Credit (LC): Secure payments through trusted financial instruments.
- Sign a Quality Agreement: Define AQL standards, inspection protocols, and liability terms.
- Implement Ongoing Audits: Conduct annual or bi-annual reviews to ensure compliance and performance.
- Leverage Sourcing Partners: Engage experienced sourcing consultants (e.g., SourcifyChina) for due diligence and supplier management.
Conclusion
In the 2026 sourcing landscape, due diligence is non-negotiable. Distinguishing between genuine manufacturers and intermediaries reduces supply chain risk, ensures product quality, and protects brand integrity. By following this verification protocol, procurement managers can confidently onboard reliable Chinese suppliers and build resilient, transparent supply chains.
Prepared by:
SourcifyChina | Senior Sourcing Consultants
Empowering Global Procurement with Verified Supply Chain Solutions
Date: Q1 2026
Confidential – For Internal Procurement Use Only
Get the Verified Supplier List
SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Report 2026
Strategic Procurement in China: Mitigating Risk, Maximizing Efficiency
Prepared for Global Procurement Leadership Teams | Q1 2026
Executive Summary: The Critical Time Drain in China Sourcing
Global procurement managers face unprecedented pressure to de-risk supply chains while accelerating time-to-market. Our 2026 industry analysis reveals that 68% of sourcing failures originate from inadequate supplier vetting, with teams spending 37+ hours per RFQ cycle verifying basic supplier legitimacy. The ambiguous search for generic terms like “china business company” exacerbates these inefficiencies, leading to counterfeit certifications, operational delays, and compliance exposure.
Why Traditional Sourcing for “China Business Companies” Fails Procurement Leaders
Generic supplier searches lack critical verification, resulting in:
| Process Stage | Traditional Sourcing (Unverified) | SourcifyChina Verified Pro List | Time Saved per RFQ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Supplier Identification | 12–18 hours (scraping unreliable directories) | <2 hours (pre-vetted shortlist) | 16+ hours |
| Compliance Verification | 15+ hours (requesting documents, chasing responses) | Instant (on-platform certification dashboard) | 15+ hours |
| Factory Audit Scheduling | 7–10 days (coordination delays) | 48 hours (pre-scheduled audit slots) | 5+ days |
| Fraud/Non-Compliance Risk | High (68% failure rate in 2025 audits) | Near-zero (<2% failure rate) | Risk Eliminated |
Source: SourcifyChina 2025 Global Procurement Audit (n=1,240 RFQs)
The SourcifyChina Advantage: Precision Sourcing for Strategic Outcomes
Our Verified Pro List eliminates the “China business company” gamble through:
✅ Triple-Layer Verification
Onsite audits, financial health checks, and export compliance validation (including US UFLPA/ EU CBAM readiness)
✅ Real-Time Capacity Data
Live production metrics, MOQ flexibility, and lead time tracking – no more supplier misrepresentation
✅ Dedicated Sourcing Engineers
Your team’s extension: managing QC, logistics coordination, and contract negotiation in Mandarin
✅ Zero-Risk Onboarding
30-day performance guarantee with penalty-backed SLAs for quality/delivery
“SourcifyChina cut our supplier validation cycle from 22 days to 72 hours, redirecting 200+ annual hours toward strategic cost engineering.”
— Head of Procurement, DAX 30 Industrial Equipment Manufacturer (2025 Client)
🔑 Your Strategic Imperative: Secure Supply Chain Resilience in 2026
In an era of tariff volatility and ESG mandates, time spent verifying suppliers is capital wasted on preventable risk. The Verified Pro List isn’t a cost – it’s your insurance policy against:
– $2.1M avg. recall costs from non-compliant suppliers (2025 Supply Chain Risk Report)
– 18–30% margin erosion from delayed production cycles
– Reputational damage from forced labor or environmental violations
✨ Call to Action: Transform Your 2026 Sourcing Strategy in 48 Hours
Stop gambling with “china business company” searches. Your verified, high-performance supplier network is ready – with zero upfront investment.
👉 Take 1 Action Today:
1. Email: [email protected] with subject line: “PRO LIST ACCESS – [Your Company Name]”
2. WhatsApp: +86 159 5127 6160 for an urgent supplier shortlist (mention code: SCC2026)
Within 48 business hours, you will receive:
– A custom shortlist of 3 pre-vetted suppliers for your exact category
– Full compliance dossier (including UFLPA evidence packs)
– 15-minute consult with your dedicated Sourcing Engineer
“In 2026, procurement winners won’t be those who source cheapest – but those who source safest, fastest, and most sustainably. The Pro List is your execution engine.”
— SourcifyChina Strategic Advisory Board
Secure your verified supply chain advantage now.
📧 [email protected] | 📱 +86 159 5127 6160 (WhatsApp)
No obligations. Zero sales pitches. Pure procurement enablement.
SourcifyChina | ISO 9001:2015 Certified Sourcing Partner | Serving Fortune 500 Procurement Teams Since 2010
Disclaimer: “China business company” is a high-risk search term indicating unverified/unregulated entities. SourcifyChina does not engage with suppliers using this nomenclature.
🧮 Landed Cost Calculator
Estimate your total import cost from China.
