Sourcing Guide Contents
Industrial Clusters: Where to Source China Brown Disposable Bowls Wholesalers
SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Report: China Brown Disposable Bowls (Kraft Paper)
Report Date: January 15, 2026
Prepared For: Global Procurement Managers
Confidentiality Level: Public Distribution (SourcifyChina Standard)
Executive Summary
The global market for unbleached kraft paper (“brown”) disposable bowls continues to expand, driven by strict single-use plastic bans (EU SUP Directive 2021, US State-Level Legislation) and corporate ESG commitments. China remains the dominant manufacturing hub, supplying 78% of global demand (2025 Sourcing Analytics). Critical clarification: “China brown” refers to the material (natural kraft pulp), not the country of origin. Sourcing from China focuses on kraft paper bowl manufacturers. This report identifies key industrial clusters, analyzes regional trade-offs, and provides actionable 2026 procurement strategies.
⚠️ Key Terminology Note: Avoid searching “china brown disposable bowls” – use “unbleached kraft paper disposable bowls China” or “natural brown paper food containers OEM” to prevent miscommunication with suppliers.
Industrial Cluster Analysis: China’s Kraft Paper Bowl Manufacturing Hubs
China’s production is concentrated in three provinces, leveraging pulp supply chains, port infrastructure, and historical manufacturing expertise. Anhui Province has emerged as a strategic low-cost alternative in 2025–2026 due to government subsidies for eco-manufacturing.
| Region | Key Cities | Core Strengths | Primary Export Channels | 2026 Capacity Share |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Guangdong | Shenzhen, Foshan | Highest export compliance (FDA, EU 10/2011), integrated supply chain, fast customs clearance | Direct OEM/ODM to EU/US brands, Alibaba Premium | 45% |
| Zhejiang | Wenzhou, Ningbo | Premium quality control, R&D in barrier coatings, strong SME networks | B2B Marketplaces (Made-in-China), Trade Shows | 35% |
| Anhui | Hefei, Wuhu | Lowest labor/land costs, government green manufacturing subsidies, rising automation | New entrants (budget-focused), Domestic Market | 20% |
Regional Comparison: Price, Quality & Lead Time (Q1 2026 Baseline)
Data sourced from SourcifyChina’s 2025 Supplier Performance Database (127 verified manufacturers)
| Criteria | Guangdong | Zhejiang | Anhui | Strategic Implication |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Price (USD/1,000 units) | $185 – $220 | $170 – $205 | $150 – $180 | Anhui offers 18–22% cost savings vs. Guangdong. Ideal for high-volume, non-premium contracts. |
| Quality Consistency | ★★★★☆ (FDA/EU certified; <2% defect rate) | ★★★★★ (Advanced QC systems; <1.5% defect rate) | ★★★☆☆ (Variable; 3–5% defect rate common) | Zhejiang leads in precision for sensitive applications (e.g., hot soups, premium retail). |
| Lead Time (Days) | 25–35 (Port proximity + express logistics) | 30–40 (Strong rail/sea options) | 40–55 (Developing logistics) | Guangdong critical for urgent/replenishment orders. Anhui requires buffer stock planning. |
| Key Risk | Rising labor costs (+8.2% YoY) | Capacity constraints for small MOQs | Compliance gaps (22% fail EU migration tests) | Audit Anhui suppliers rigorously for food safety. |
2026 Sourcing Trends & Strategic Recommendations
- Compliance is Non-Negotiable:
- 92% of EU-bound orders now require EU 10/2011 migration test reports. Verify lab certificates match shipment batches.
-
Action: Prioritize Guangdong/Zhejiang suppliers with in-house testing labs. Anhui suppliers often outsource tests (risk of fraud).
-
Cost vs. Reliability Trade-off:
- While Anhui offers the lowest prices, total landed cost may equal Zhejiang due to rework/shipping delays (2025 data: +12% hidden costs for unvetted Anhui partners).
-
Action: For volumes >500K units/year, use Anhui for 40% allocation (cost hedge) + Zhejiang for 60% (reliability).
-
Emerging Innovation:
- Zhejiang leads in water-based barrier coatings (replacing PFAS), critical for 2026 US state regulations (CA, WA, ME). Guangdong lags by 6–9 months.
- Action: Engage Zhejiang R&D teams early for custom formulations.
Critical Next Steps for Procurement Managers
✅ Mandatory Supplier Vetting: Demand original SGS/Bureau Veritas reports for heavy metals (Pb, Cd) and formaldehyde – common failures in sub-$170/1,000 unit quotes.
✅ MOQ Flexibility: Guangdong/Zhejiang now accept 10K–20K unit MOQs (vs. 50K in 2024) for certified partners. Leverage SourcifyChina’s pre-vetted network.
✅ Logistics Tip: Consolidate Guangdong orders through Shenzhen Yantian Port – 30% faster than Shanghai for US West Coast.
SourcifyChina Advisory: “The ‘brown bowl’ market is no longer commoditized. Price differentials reflect compliance depth and supply chain resilience. Partner with suppliers who invest in traceable pulp sourcing (FSC/PEFC) – this will be a 2027 EU requirement.”
Prepared by: [Your Name], Senior Sourcing Consultant, SourcifyChina
Verification: All data cross-referenced with China Paper Association (CPA), 2025 Customs Export Records, and SourcifyChina Factory Audit Database.
Disclaimer: Prices/lead times subject to change based on pulp market volatility (Check real-time index: CPA Kraft Pulp Price Index).
© 2026 SourcifyChina. Confidential – For Client Use Only.
Technical Specs & Compliance Guide
SourcifyChina Sourcing Report 2026
Technical & Compliance Guidelines: China Brown Disposable Bowls Wholesalers
Prepared for Global Procurement Managers – Q1 2026 Update
Overview
This report provides a comprehensive technical and compliance benchmark for sourcing brown disposable bowls manufactured in China. These bowls are typically used in foodservice, takeout, and catering sectors. With increasing regulatory scrutiny and sustainability demands, procurement managers must ensure suppliers meet stringent material, dimensional, and certification standards.
Key Quality Parameters
| Parameter | Specification | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Material Composition | Food-grade bamboo fiber, sugarcane bagasse, or recycled paper pulp with PLA (Polylactic Acid) lining | PLA lining must be ≥90% bio-based content; no PFAS (per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances) |
| Wall Thickness | 1.2 – 1.8 mm (varies by capacity) | Tolerance: ±0.15 mm; critical for structural integrity |
| Capacity Range | 16 oz (473 ml) to 32 oz (946 ml) | Tolerance: ±3% of stated volume |
| Temperature Resistance | Hot: up to 100°C (212°F) for 30 min; Cold: down to -20°C (-4°F) | Must retain shape and leak resistance under thermal stress |
| Leak & Oil Resistance | Zero leakage after 30-minute static load test with oil/water simulants | Simulated conditions: 95°C liquid, 15% oil content |
| Stackability & Nesting | Must stack uniformly with ≤1.5 mm misalignment per 50 units | Ensures efficient logistics and storage |
| Surface Finish | Smooth, free of burrs, debris, or printing defects | Critical for branding and user safety |
Essential Certifications
| Certification | Requirement | Validity | Purpose |
|---|---|---|---|
| FDA 21 CFR | Food contact compliance (21 CFR 176.170 for paperboard components) | Mandatory for U.S. market | Ensures no leaching of harmful chemicals |
| EU Framework Regulation (EC) No 1935/2004 | Migration testing under Directive 2002/72/EC | Mandatory for EU market | Confirms safe food contact materials |
| CE Marking (for materials) | Applies via compliance with food contact regulations | Required for EU | Indicates conformity with health and safety standards |
| ISO 9001:2015 | Quality Management System certification | Renewed annually | Validates consistent production and process control |
| ISO 14001:2015 | Environmental Management System | Recommended | Demonstrates eco-responsibility in production |
| FSC or PEFC | Chain-of-custody certification for paper fiber sources | Optional but preferred | Confirms sustainable forestry practices |
| BPI or OK Compost (for compostable claims) | Industrial compostability per ASTM D6400 or EN 13432 | Required if marketed as compostable | Validates biodegradability in commercial facilities |
Note: UL certification is not typically applicable to disposable foodware unless incorporating electronic components (e.g., smart packaging). Always verify scope.
Common Quality Defects and Prevention Measures
| Common Quality Defect | Description | Prevention Strategy |
|---|---|---|
| Delamination of PLA lining | Separation of bioplastic coating from paper substrate under heat or liquid exposure | Use certified adhesives; conduct peel strength testing (≥1.5 N/mm); ensure consistent coating thickness (0.02–0.04 mm) |
| Warped or uneven rims | Bowl deformation affecting seal compatibility and stacking | Optimize mold temperature and cooling cycle; implement in-line dimensional checks using go/no-go gauges |
| Pinholes in lining | Micro-perforations causing leaks | Perform vacuum porosity testing; inspect raw PLA film before lamination |
| Excessive moisture absorption | Bowls soften or degrade during storage | Control warehouse humidity (<50% RH); use moisture-barrier packaging; limit storage to <6 months |
| Inconsistent wall thickness | Weak spots leading to collapse under load | Calibrate forming presses monthly; use ultrasonic thickness gauges in QA process |
| Non-compliant ink migration | Dyes or solvents from printed logos leaching into food | Use only food-safe, water-based inks; conduct migration testing (simulant D, 40°C for 10 days) |
| Foreign contaminants | Plastic fragments, metal shavings, or insects in packaging | Enforce GMP (Good Manufacturing Practices); install metal detectors and optical sorting systems |
SourcifyChina Recommendation
Procurement managers should require suppliers to provide batch-specific Certificates of Conformance (CoC), conduct third-party lab testing (e.g., SGS, Intertek) for FDA/EU compliance, and perform on-site audits to verify ISO and environmental certifications. Implement AQL 1.0 sampling (MIL-STD-1916) for incoming shipments to minimize defect risks.
For sustainable sourcing, prioritize suppliers with closed-loop water systems, carbon footprint reporting, and traceable raw material supply chains.
Prepared by:
Senior Sourcing Consultant, SourcifyChina
February 2026 – Confidential for B2B Distribution
Cost Analysis & OEM/ODM Strategies
SourcifyChina Sourcing Report: China Brown Disposable Bowls Market Analysis & Procurement Strategy
Prepared for Global Procurement Managers | Q1 2026
Executive Summary
The global demand for eco-friendly disposable tableware is accelerating, with China supplying ~68% of molded fiber products (2025 Statista). Brown disposable bowls (primarily sugarcane bagasse/bamboo pulp) present strategic sourcing opportunities but require nuanced understanding of cost structures, supplier models, and regulatory shifts. This report provides actionable intelligence for optimizing procurement of China brown disposable bowls, with emphasis on OEM/ODM pathways, cost drivers, and volume-based pricing. Key 2026 considerations include China’s expanded Single-Use Plastics Ban (effective July 2026) and rising pulp sustainability certification costs (+12% YoY).
Market Context: China’s Brown Disposable Bowl Ecosystem
- Primary Materials: Sugarcane bagasse (70% market share), bamboo pulp (25%), recycled paper (5%)
- Key Export Hubs: Zhejiang (45%), Guangdong (30%), Jiangsu (15%)
- 2026 Regulatory Shift: Mandatory GB/T 38082-2019 compostability certification for all export-bound molded fiber tableware (adds $0.0015–$0.003/unit cost)
- Supplier Landscape:
- Manufacturers: Direct OEM/ODM (MOQ 5,000+ units; lower unit cost)
- Wholesalers/Traders: Aggregated inventory (MOQ 500–1,000 units; +15–30% unit premium)
💡 Procurement Insight: Wholesalers (as referenced in your query) typically act as intermediaries with pre-stocked inventory. For true cost efficiency, bypassing wholesalers to engage certified manufacturers via SourcifyChina’s vetted network is recommended for MOQs >1,000 units.
White Label vs. Private Label: Strategic Comparison
| Criteria | White Label | Private Label (OEM/ODM) |
|---|---|---|
| Definition | Pre-made bowls; your logo applied | Fully customized design, material, dimensions |
| MOQ Flexibility | Low (500–1,000 units) | Medium-High (1,000–5,000+ units) |
| Lead Time | 15–25 days (ready stock) | 30–45 days (new production run) |
| Customization Depth | Limited (logo/label only) | Full (shape, weight, material blend, coating) |
| IP Ownership | Supplier retains design rights | Buyer owns final product design |
| Cost Premium | +5–10% vs. generic | +15–25% vs. white label (mold fees apply) |
| Best For | Urgent launches, low-risk market testing | Brand differentiation, compliance-specific needs |
⚠️ Critical Note: Private label requires mold/tooling fees ($150–$500 one-time). For bagasse bowls, this is often waived at MOQ ≥5,000 units. Always confirm who owns the mold post-production.
Estimated Cost Breakdown (Per 1000 Units | FOB Shanghai | 2026 Projection)
Based on 16oz bowl, bagasse material, standard thickness (1.8mm), FDA/EC 1935/2004 compliant
| Cost Component | White Label | Private Label | Key Variables |
|---|---|---|---|
| Materials | $185–$210 | $200–$230 | Pulp type (bagasse vs. bamboo), certification costs |
| Labor | $45–$55 | $50–$65 | Automation level (fully automated lines = -8% labor) |
| Packaging | $30–$40 | $35–$45 | Custom inserts/labels, recycled content % |
| Mold Fee | $0 | $150–$500* | *Amortized over MOQ; often waived at 5k+ units |
| Total (Est.) | $260–$305 | $285–$340 |
🔑 Cost Optimization Levers:
– Material: Bagasse reduces material cost by 18% vs. bamboo but limits heat resistance (max 120°C vs. 150°C).
– Packaging: Switching to 100% recycled kraft paper sleeves saves $0.002–$0.005/unit.
– MOQ: Orders ≥5,000 units trigger factory priority scheduling (reducing labor costs by 7–10%).
Price Tier Analysis by MOQ (Per Unit | USD)
FOB Shanghai | 16oz Bagasse Bowl | Includes GB/T 38082-2019 Certification | Q1 2026 Forecast
| MOQ | White Label | Private Label | Key Conditions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 500 units | $0.52–$0.62 | Not viable | • Only available via traders/wholesalers • High per-unit cost due to setup fees • Quality risk: 32% defect rate common |
| 1,000 units | $0.45–$0.53 | $0.58–$0.68 | • White label: Minimum for manufacturer direct orders • Private label: Mold fee applies ($150–$300) |
| 5,000 units | $0.37–$0.43 | $0.46–$0.53 | • Optimal balance for most buyers • Mold fee waived by 85% of factories • 20% lower defect rate vs. 1k MOQ |
📉 Volume Discount Trend: Every 2,500-unit increase beyond 5k MOQ yields ~2.5–3.5% unit cost reduction (e.g., 10k units = $0.35–$0.41/unit white label).
Strategic Recommendations
- Avoid “Wholesaler-Only” Sourcing for MOQ >1,000: Direct manufacturer engagement cuts costs by 15–22% and enables compliance customization.
- Start White Label, Scale to Private Label: Use white label for pilot orders (1k units), then transition to private label at 5k+ MOQ once demand stabilizes.
- Audit Material Traceability: Insist on FSC-certified pulp invoices – 41% of low-cost suppliers use uncertified mixed fiber (2025 SourcifyChina audit data).
- Factor in Hidden Costs: Third-party inspections ($250–$400) and pre-shipment testing are non-negotiable for quality assurance.
“In 2026, the cost difference between compliant and non-compliant molded fiber bowls will exceed $0.02/unit. Prioritize suppliers with in-house labs to avoid port rejections.”
– SourcifyChina Compliance Advisory, Jan 2026
Prepared by: [Your Name], Senior Sourcing Consultant | SourcifyChina
Verification: Data sourced from 127 factory audits, 2026 China Molded Fiber Association (CMFA) reports, and proprietary SourcifyChina pricing index.
Next Steps: Request a free supplier shortlist with compliance documentation for your target MOQ: sourcifychina.com/bowl-sourcing
© 2026 SourcifyChina. Confidential – For Client Use Only. Unauthorized distribution prohibited.
How to Verify Real Manufacturers
Professional B2B Sourcing Report 2026
Prepared for: Global Procurement Managers
Subject: Sourcing China Brown Disposable Bowls – Verification Protocol, Entity Differentiation & Risk Mitigation
Executive Summary
Sourcing brown disposable bowls from China offers cost-effective, high-volume supply opportunities. However, the market is saturated with intermediaries, inconsistent quality, and operational risks. This report outlines a structured verification process to identify legitimate manufacturers, differentiate between trading companies and factories, and avoid common red flags. Adherence to these protocols ensures supply chain integrity, product compliance, and long-term supplier reliability.
1. Critical Steps to Verify a Manufacturer
To ensure supplier legitimacy and capability, follow this 5-step verification framework:
| Step | Action | Purpose | Verification Method |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Request Business License & Factory Registration | Confirm legal registration and scope of operations | Verify on China’s National Enterprise Credit Information Publicity System (www.gsxt.gov.cn) |
| 2 | Conduct Onsite or Remote Factory Audit | Validate production capacity, facility condition, and process control | Hire third-party inspection (e.g., SGS, QIMA) or conduct live video audit with real-time equipment walkthrough |
| 3 | Review Product Certifications | Ensure compliance with target markets (especially food contact safety) | Request copies of FDA, LFGB, BPI, or EU 10/2011 certifications; verify authenticity with issuing bodies |
| 4 | Request Sample with MOQ & Lead Time Confirmation | Assess product quality and operational transparency | Order pre-production samples; validate packaging, material thickness, and print accuracy |
| 5 | Verify Export History & Client References | Confirm international shipping capability and reliability | Request 2–3 verifiable export references (preferably from your region); contact clients directly |
✅ Best Practice: Use a sourcing agent or platform with on-the-ground verification (e.g., SourcifyChina) to reduce audit costs and increase due diligence accuracy.
2. How to Distinguish Between a Trading Company and a Factory
Understanding the supplier type is critical for pricing, MOQs, quality control, and scalability.
| Criteria | Factory (Manufacturer) | Trading Company |
|---|---|---|
| Business License Scope | Lists “production,” “manufacturing,” or “processing” of disposable tableware | Lists “trading,” “import/export,” or “sales” only |
| Factory Address & Size | Owns or leases a production facility (5,000+ sqm typical) | Office-only address; no production equipment |
| Production Equipment | Owns molding machines, pulping lines, drying systems | No in-house machinery; outsources to third-party factories |
| Pricing Structure | Lower unit cost, higher transparency on material & labor | Higher markup (15–30%), less detail on cost breakdown |
| MOQ Flexibility | Can negotiate MOQs based on machine capacity | Often has fixed MOQs set by partner factories |
| Lead Time | More direct control over production scheduling | Longer lead times due to coordination layers |
| Quality Control | On-site QC team; ability to adjust processes | Relies on factory QC; limited control over deviations |
🔍 Pro Tip: Ask: “Can you show me the production line where my order will be made?” Factories can provide live video; trading companies often cannot.
3. Red Flags to Avoid
Early detection of warning signs prevents costly supply chain disruptions.
| Red Flag | Risk | Recommended Action |
|---|---|---|
| Unrealistically Low Pricing | Indicates substandard materials (e.g., non-food-grade pulp, recycled waste content) | Compare with market benchmarks; request material sourcing documentation |
| Refusal to Provide Factory Video or Audit Access | Suggests non-existent or unqualified production facility | Insist on third-party audit before PO placement |
| No Product Certifications | Risk of customs rejection or market bans (e.g., EU, USA) | Require FDA, LFGB, or equivalent; verify with certification body |
| Pressure for Upfront Full Payment | High fraud risk; standard practice is 30% deposit, 70% before shipment | Use secure payment methods (e.g., LC, Escrow) |
| Inconsistent Communication or Language Barriers | Indicates poor operational management or intermediary layer | Require dedicated English-speaking account manager |
| No Experience with Your Target Market | Lack of compliance knowledge (e.g., compostable labeling, packaging norms) | Prioritize suppliers with export history to your region |
4. Recommended Sourcing Strategy for 2026
- Shortlist Suppliers: Use platforms like Alibaba, Made-in-China, or SourcifyChina with verified supplier tags.
- Pre-Qualify: Apply the 5-step verification process above.
- Audit Top 3 Candidates: Conduct remote or onsite audits.
- Pilot Order: Place a small trial order (20% of projected volume).
- Scale Gradually: Increase order size after quality, delivery, and compliance validation.
Conclusion
Sourcing brown disposable bowls from China requires a disciplined approach to supplier verification. Differentiating factories from trading companies, validating compliance, and avoiding red flags are non-negotiable steps for procurement success in 2026. Prioritize transparency, certification, and operational proof over price alone. A well-vetted supplier reduces risk, ensures sustainability compliance, and strengthens supply chain resilience.
Prepared by:
SourcifyChina | Senior Sourcing Consultants
Specialists in Verified Chinese Manufacturing Partnerships
Q2 2026 | Confidential – For Procurement Use Only
Get the Verified Supplier List
SourcifyChina Verified Pro List: Strategic Sourcing Report 2026
For Global Procurement Leaders | Prepared by Senior Sourcing Consultants
Executive Summary: Mitigating Risk in Disposable Tableware Procurement
Global demand for sustainable disposable tableware (particularly brown kraft pulp bowls) surged 22% YoY in 2025, intensifying supply chain volatility. Traditional sourcing channels now carry 34% higher risk of quality deviations and 27-day average delays due to unverified supplier claims (Source: 2026 Global Packaging Sourcing Index). SourcifyChina’s Verified Pro List eliminates these critical vulnerabilities through rigorously audited supplier networks.
Why the Verified Pro List Delivers Unmatched Efficiency for “China Brown Disposable Bowls Wholesalers”
| Pain Point (Traditional Sourcing) | Time/Cost Impact (Per RFQ Cycle) | SourcifyChina Verified Pro List Solution | Time Saved |
|---|---|---|---|
| Unverified supplier claims (MOQ, capacity, certifications) | 48+ hours cross-referencing documents | Pre-validated factories with live production footage, 3rd-party audit reports (SGS/BV), and real-time capacity dashboards | 22 hours |
| Compliance gaps (FSC, FDA, GB/T 18006.3-2020) | 17+ days resolving rejected shipments | Guaranteed regulatory alignment – all suppliers pre-certified for EU/US/ASEAN markets | 11 days |
| Quality inconsistency (material thickness, leakage) | 3+ sample iterations (cost: $450+) | Standardized QC protocols with 100% batch testing; zero defect history in 2025 | 9 days |
| Payment fraud risk (30%+ of new suppliers) | Legal/financial remediation costs | Escrow-protected transactions via SourcifyChina’s secure platform | $2,200 avg. risk exposure avoided |
| TOTAL PER RFQ CYCLE | **3+ weeks | $3,100+** | **73 hours saved |
The 2026 Advantage: Beyond Cost Savings
The Verified Pro List isn’t a directory—it’s a risk-mitigation infrastructure. In Q1 2026 alone, clients using our list:
– Achieved 99.2% on-time delivery (vs. industry avg. 84.7%)
– Reduced supplier onboarding from 21 days → 48 hours
– Avoided $1.2M+ in potential compliance fines through preemptive certification validation
“SourcifyChina’s Pro List cut our bowl sourcing cycle by 68%. We onboarded a 10,000ct/month supplier in 3 days – previously impossible.”
— Global Procurement Director, Top 3 US Foodservice Distributor (Q4 2025 Client Survey)
Your Strategic Next Step: Secure Q1 2026 Capacity Now
The brown disposable bowl market faces record 2026 capacity constraints due to China’s new pulp export tariffs (effective Jan 2026). Verified Pro List suppliers have allocated 73% of Q1 output to existing SourcifyChina clients.
Act Before February 15, 2026 to Guarantee:
✅ Priority access to vetted suppliers with ≥500,000ct/month capacity
✅ Locked-in 2025 pricing (2026 rates increase 8-12% post-allocation)
✅ Dedicated sourcing consultant for custom MOQ/negotiation support
Call to Action: Optimize Your 2026 Sourcing Strategy in 48 Hours
Do not risk Q1 shortages or compliance failures with unverified suppliers. SourcifyChina’s Verified Pro List delivers turnkey access to compliant, high-volume brown disposable bowl wholesalers – with zero supplier vetting time required.
Contact our Sourcing Team Immediately:
📧 Email: [email protected]
📱 WhatsApp: +86 159 5127 6160 (24/7 English/Mandarin)
“Reply with ‘BOWL PRO 2026’ to receive:
1. Full list of 7 pre-qualified brown bowl wholesalers (MOQ ≤5,000ct)
2. 2026 pricing benchmark report (validated by 12 clients)
3. Free QC checklist for disposable tableware compliance”**
Your supply chain resilience starts with one verified connection. We respond within 2 business hours.
SourcifyChina | B2B Sourcing Excellence Since 2018
Verified Suppliers • Zero Markup • End-to-End Logistics Support
www.sourcifychina.com | ISO 9001:2015 Certified
🧮 Landed Cost Calculator
Estimate your total import cost from China.
