Sourcing Guide Contents
Industrial Clusters: Where to Source China Bike Company
SourcifyChina B2B Sourcing Report 2026
Subject: Deep-Dive Market Analysis – Sourcing Bike Manufacturers in China
Prepared For: Global Procurement Managers
Date: January 2026
Author: Senior Sourcing Consultant, SourcifyChina
Executive Summary
China remains the world’s largest manufacturer and exporter of bicycles, accounting for over 60% of global production volume. While the term “China bike company” is generic, it typically refers to OEM/ODM bicycle manufacturers producing a broad range of products—from entry-level commuter bikes to high-end e-bikes and folding models. This report identifies and analyzes key industrial clusters for bicycle manufacturing in China, evaluates regional strengths, and provides a comparative benchmark for procurement decision-making.
China’s bicycle industry has evolved into a highly specialized ecosystem, with distinct regional hubs offering unique advantages in cost, quality, and lead time. Understanding these clusters enables procurement managers to optimize sourcing strategies based on product specifications, volume requirements, and target market positioning.
Key Industrial Clusters for Bicycle Manufacturing in China
The Chinese bicycle manufacturing landscape is concentrated in three primary industrial clusters, each with specialized capabilities and supply chain ecosystems:
1. Tianjin (Tianjin Municipality)
- Overview: Historically the largest bicycle production base in China, Tianjin hosts hundreds of manufacturers, including major players like Giant (subsidiary operations), Forever, and numerous OEMs.
- Focus: Mass production of standard commuter bikes, children’s bikes, and mid-tier e-bikes.
- Supply Chain: Mature component ecosystem (frames, wheels, drivetrains).
- Export Hub: Proximity to the Port of Tianjin enables efficient shipping to North America and Europe.
2. Zhejiang Province (Ningbo, Wenzhou, Hangzhou)
- Overview: A high-value manufacturing cluster, especially strong in e-bikes, folding bikes, and premium alloy/carbon frames.
- Focus: Mid-to-high-end bicycles, electric assist bikes (pedelecs), and export-oriented OEMs.
- Innovation: Strong R&D capabilities; many factories certified for EU CE, EN, and U.S. CPSC standards.
- Supply Chain: Integrated with aluminum and lithium battery suppliers.
3. Guangdong Province (Dongguan, Shenzhen, Guangzhou)
- Overview: Known for advanced manufacturing and electronics integration; increasingly dominant in smart e-bikes and IoT-enabled cycles.
- Focus: High-tech e-bikes, folding bikes with integrated motors/batteries, premium urban mobility solutions.
- Strengths: Proximity to electronics supply chains (e.g., Shenzhen’s component markets); strong in design and rapid prototyping.
- Clients: Many Western DTC (direct-to-consumer) brands source from Guangdong due to quality consistency and innovation.
Comparative Analysis of Key Production Regions
| Region | Average Price (USD/unit) | Quality Tier | Lead Time (Mass Production) | Key Advantages | Best Suited For |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tianjin | $40 – $90 | Entry-Level to Mid-Tier | 30–45 days | Lowest labor & production costs; high volume capacity | Budget commuter bikes, large-volume tenders |
| Zhejiang | $80 – $180 | Mid-Tier to Premium | 45–60 days | Strong engineering; high compliance; e-bike specialists | E-bikes, EU/US compliance-driven projects |
| Guangdong | $100 – $250+ | Premium to High-Tech | 50–70 days | Electronics integration; modern facilities; design focus | Smart e-bikes, DTC brands, innovation-driven models |
Notes:
– Prices based on FOB (Free on Board) basis for 1×20′ container (approx. 150–200 units, depending on model).
– Quality Tier reflects build consistency, material standards, and compliance certifications.
– Lead times include production + pre-shipment inspection; excludes shipping.
– Premium pricing in Guangdong driven by use of lithium batteries, motors, and CNC fabrication.
Strategic Sourcing Recommendations
-
For Cost-Sensitive, High-Volume Procurement
→ Source from Tianjin. Ideal for municipal bike-sharing programs, retail mass-market bikes, or emerging market distribution. Conduct strict QC audits to mitigate quality variability. -
For E-Bike and Mid-to-High-End Bicycles (EU/US Markets)
→ Prioritize Zhejiang-based suppliers. Manufacturers here are experienced with international certifications, alloy frame welding, and regulatory documentation. Strong balance of price and quality. -
For Smart, Connected, or Premium Urban Mobility Solutions
→ Engage Guangdong OEMs. Superior in integrating electronics, app connectivity, and industrial design. Higher costs justified for premium brand positioning.
Market Trends Impacting 2026 Sourcing Strategy
- E-Bike Boom: Global demand for e-bikes grew 12% YoY in 2025; Zhejiang and Guangdong are best positioned to scale.
- Automation & Compliance: Increasing automation in Guangdong and Zhejiang is improving quality consistency and reducing labor dependency.
- Carbon Footprint Pressure: European buyers are demanding green manufacturing data. Zhejiang leads in ISO 14001-certified facilities.
- Tariff Considerations: Bicycles from Tianjin may face higher scrutiny under U.S. Section 301; dual-sourcing strategies are recommended.
Conclusion
China’s bicycle manufacturing sector is regionally specialized, offering distinct advantages based on product type and market requirements. Procurement managers should align sourcing decisions with strategic objectives: cost leadership (Tianjin), compliance and quality (Zhejiang), or innovation and technology integration (Guangdong).
SourcifyChina recommends conducting on-site factory audits, leveraging local sourcing partners, and implementing multi-supplier diversification to mitigate supply chain risks in 2026 and beyond.
Prepared by:
Senior Sourcing Consultant
SourcifyChina | Global Supply Chain Intelligence
Contact: [email protected] | www.sourcifychina.com
Technical Specs & Compliance Guide
SourcifyChina B2B Sourcing Intelligence Report: Chinese Bicycle Manufacturing Sector
Report Date: January 15, 2026
Prepared For: Global Procurement Managers (OEMs, Distributors, Retail Brands)
Prepared By: Senior Sourcing Consultant, SourcifyChina
Executive Summary
China remains the dominant global hub for bicycle manufacturing (70%+ market share), producing 80M+ units annually. While cost efficiency is a key driver, quality consistency and regulatory compliance are critical procurement risks in 2026. This report details technical specifications, mandatory certifications, and defect prevention protocols for sourcing bicycles from China. Note: “China Bike Company” refers to the broader Chinese bicycle manufacturing ecosystem; no single entity uses this exact name.
I. Technical Specifications & Key Quality Parameters
A. Core Material Specifications
| Component | Standard Material Grades | Critical Tolerances | Testing Requirement |
|---|---|---|---|
| Frame (Alloy) | 6061-T6 or 7005-T6 Aluminum (EN AW-6061/7005) | Weld seam gap: ≤0.3mm; Frame alignment: ≤1.5mm deviation over 1000mm | EN ISO 14269 (Fatigue Test) |
| Frame (Carbon) | T700/T800 Toray-grade fiber; Resin: Epoxy 350°F cure | Wall thickness variance: ≤5%; Resin content: 35-40% | ASTM F2711 (Impact Resistance) |
| Wheels | Double-wall rims (6061-T6); Spoke tension: 110-130 kgf | Wheel trueness: ≤0.5mm lateral/vertical runout | EN 14781 (Dynamic Strength) |
| Drivetrain | CrMo 4130 chainrings; 9/10/11-speed cassettes | Chainline deviation: ≤0.3mm; Cassette runout: ≤0.15mm | ISO 9633 (Chain Wear Resistance) |
| E-Bike Motors | 250W (EU) / 750W (US) nominal; IP65 minimum | Torque ripple: ≤5%; Temperature rise: ≤45°C at max load | EN 15194:2024 (E-bike Safety) |
B. Critical Manufacturing Tolerances
- Frame Geometry: Deviation from CAD model ≤ ±0.8mm at critical junctions (BB, HT, dropout).
- Paint/Coating: Thickness: 60-90μm (powder coat); Adhesion: ≥5B (ASTM D3359 cross-hatch test).
- Bearing Systems: Cup/cone preload tolerance: ±0.05mm; Axial play ≤0.1mm.
- E-Bike Battery: Cell voltage variance ≤0.05V; BMS cutoff accuracy: ±1%.
II. Essential Compliance Certifications (Non-Negotiable)
Failure to provide valid documentation results in port rejection (EU/US) or safety recalls.
| Certification | Jurisdiction | Scope | Validity | Verification Method |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CE Marking | European Union | EN ISO 4210 (Bicycles), EN 15194:2024 (E-bikes) | Indefinite* | Review EU Declaration of Conformity + Notified Body certificate (e-bikes) |
| CPSC 16 CFR 1512 | United States | Mechanical/safety standards (brakes, reflectors) | Indefinite | Third-party test report (CPSC-accredited lab) |
| ISO 9001:2025 | Global | Quality Management System (QMS) | 3 years | Audit certificate + scope validity |
| CCC (China Compulsory Certification) | China | Domestic sales requirement (frames, e-bikes) | 5 years | CNCA-005-2024 certificate + factory inspection |
| UL 2849 | United States | E-bike electrical safety (batteries, controllers) | 2 years | UL test report + factory follow-up |
Critical Notes:
– FDA is NOT applicable (bicycles are not medical devices).
– EN 15194:2024 now mandates cybersecurity protocols for e-bike firmware (new for 2026).
– ISO 45001:2025 increasingly required by EU brands for ESG compliance.
III. Common Quality Defects & Prevention Protocol
| Common Quality Defect | Root Cause | Prevention Protocol | Verification Method |
|---|---|---|---|
| Frame Weld Failures | Inconsistent weld penetration; Contaminated base metal | – Implement automated weld parameter logging (current/voltage/speed) – Mandatory argon purity ≥99.996% |
Dye penetrant testing (100% frames); X-ray sampling (AQL 0.65) |
| Premature Bearing Wear | Improper preload; Contaminated grease | – Calibrated torque wrenches for assembly – Cleanroom assembly for hubs/BBDs (ISO Class 8) |
Vibration analysis during QC; Grease composition certs |
| E-Bike Battery Swelling | Overcharging; Cell mismatch; Poor BMS calibration | – 100% cell grading pre-pack assembly – BMS validation via CAN bus simulation |
Cycle testing (500+ cycles); Thermal imaging during charge |
| Paint Adhesion Failure | Inadequate surface prep; Humidity during curing | – Phosphating pretreatment + 24hr humidity bake – Real-time booth climate monitoring |
ASTM D3359 cross-hatch test (min. 3 samples/lot) |
| Chain Drop/Skipping | Incorrect chainline; Worn sprockets | – Laser alignment jigs for drivetrain assembly – Hardness testing on chainrings (HRC 45-50) |
Dynamic test rig (10km simulated ride) |
| Brake Lever Sponginess | Air in hydraulic lines; Seal compression set | – Vacuum bleeding protocol – Seal material spec: NBR 70±5 Shore A hardness |
Pressure decay test (200psi hold, 5min) |
IV. Strategic Recommendations for Procurement Managers
- Mandate 3rd-Party Pre-Shipment Inspection (PSI):
- AQL 1.0 for safety-critical components (frames, brakes, e-bike systems).
- Include dynamic testing (e.g., 500km simulated ride for e-bikes).
- Supplier Qualification Checklist:
- Validate ISO 9001:2025 certificate with bicycle-specific scope.
- Require proof of EN 15194:2024 cybersecurity compliance (e-bikes).
- Audit factory for ISO 14001 (environmental) and SA8000 (social) if ESG-compliant sourcing is required.
- Contractual Safeguards:
- Include liquidated damages for certification lapses (e.g., 15% of order value).
- Retain title until CE/CPSC documentation is verified by independent lab.
SourcifyChina Value-Add: Our 2026 Compliance Shield™ service includes:
– Real-time certification database updates (EN 15194:2024, CPSC revisions)
– Blockchain-tracked PSI reports with AI defect analysis
– Dedicated regulatory liaison for EU/US market access
Disclaimer: This report reflects regulatory standards as of Q1 2026. Always validate requirements with local legal counsel prior to shipment. SourcifyChina does not endorse specific manufacturers but provides data-driven sourcing enablement.
© 2026 SourcifyChina. Confidential for intended recipient only. Unauthorized distribution prohibited.
Cost Analysis & OEM/ODM Strategies
SourcifyChina Sourcing Report 2026
Prepared for: Global Procurement Managers
Subject: Manufacturing Cost Analysis & OEM/ODM Strategy for China-Based Bike Manufacturers
Focus: White Label vs. Private Label | Cost Breakdown | MOQ-Based Pricing Tiers
Executive Summary
This report provides a strategic overview of manufacturing and sourcing opportunities with Chinese bike manufacturers in 2026. As global demand for urban mobility and sustainable transport grows, China remains a dominant hub for bicycle production, offering competitive pricing, scalable OEM/ODM capabilities, and rapid turnaround. This guide evaluates White Label vs. Private Label models, outlines cost drivers, and presents estimated pricing tiers based on Minimum Order Quantities (MOQs) to support informed procurement decisions.
1. OEM/ODM Landscape in China’s Bicycle Industry
China accounts for over 60% of global bicycle production, with key manufacturing clusters in Guangdong, Tianjin, and Zhejiang provinces. Leading suppliers offer end-to-end solutions from design to delivery under both OEM (Original Equipment Manufacturing) and ODM (Original Design Manufacturing) models.
- OEM: Manufacturer produces bikes to your exact specifications. Ideal for brands with established designs.
- ODM: Manufacturer provides pre-designed models that can be customized. Faster time-to-market and lower R&D costs.
2. White Label vs. Private Label: Strategic Comparison
| Criteria | White Label | Private Label |
|---|---|---|
| Definition | Pre-built, generic bikes rebranded with your logo | Fully customized bikes under your brand identity |
| Customization Level | Low (branding only) | High (frame geometry, components, materials, branding) |
| MOQ | Lower (500–1,000 units) | Moderate to High (1,000–5,000+ units) |
| Lead Time | Short (4–6 weeks) | Medium to Long (8–14 weeks) |
| R&D Involvement | None | High (design validation, testing, compliance) |
| IP Ownership | Shared or limited | Full ownership under brand |
| Best For | Entry-level brands, quick market entry, cost savings | Premium brands, differentiation, long-term positioning |
Recommendation: Opt for White Label to test market demand; transition to Private Label for brand equity and margin control.
3. Estimated Cost Breakdown (Per Unit, Mid-Range Hybrid Bike)
All costs are estimated in USD and based on standard components, excluding shipping, duties, and certifications.
| Cost Component | Description | Estimated Cost (USD) |
|---|---|---|
| Frame & Fork | Aluminum alloy, double-butted tubing | $45 – $65 |
| Drivetrain | Shimano Tourney or equivalent, 7-speed | $25 – $35 |
| Wheels & Tires | 700c alloy rims, puncture-resistant tires | $30 – $40 |
| Brakes | Mechanical disc or V-brakes | $12 – $18 |
| Handlebar & Stem | Alloy riser bar, adjustable stem | $8 – $12 |
| Saddle & Seatpost | Ergonomic saddle, alloy seatpost | $7 – $10 |
| Labor (Assembly & QA) | Skilled labor, final inspection | $10 – $15 |
| Packaging | Corrugated box, foam inserts, branding labels | $6 – $9 |
| Miscellaneous | Bearings, cables, pedals, reflectors | $8 – $12 |
| Total Estimated Cost (Per Unit) | — | $151 – $216 |
Note: E-bike variants add $180–$300 per unit (motor, battery, controller, software).
4. Price Tiers by MOQ (OEM/ODM Hybrid Bike)
The table below reflects FOB Shenzhen pricing for a standard 7-speed aluminum hybrid bike (White Label and Private Label options).
| MOQ (Units) | Unit Price (White Label) | Unit Price (Private Label) | Savings vs. White Label | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 500 | $220 | $240 | — | White Label: Limited branding. Private Label: Custom frame decals, minor geometry tweaks. |
| 1,000 | $205 | $225 | 7.3% | Economies of scale kick in. Tooling amortized. |
| 5,000 | $185 | $200 | 13.0% | Full Private Label with custom frame molds (shared tooling). |
| 10,000+ | $170 | $185 | 17.6% | Dedicated production line, optimized logistics. |
Tooling & Setup Fees (One-Time):
– White Label: $0–$2,000 (branding molds)
– Private Label (custom frame): $15,000–$30,000 (die casting, CAD validation, testing)
5. Strategic Recommendations
- Start with White Label at 500–1,000 MOQ to validate market response with minimal risk.
- Negotiate shared tooling for Private Label to reduce upfront costs.
- Leverage ODM catalogs for faster customization—many suppliers offer “semi-private” label options.
- Audit suppliers for ISO 9001, EN/BST compliance, and export experience.
- Factor in logistics: Add $15–$25/unit for sea freight (40’ container, LCL/FCL), plus import duties (varies by destination).
Conclusion
China’s bicycle manufacturing ecosystem offers unmatched scalability and cost efficiency. While White Label provides a fast, low-risk entry, Private Label delivers long-term brand value and margin potential. Procurement managers should align MOQ strategy with brand positioning, volume forecasts, and customization needs.
For tailored supplier shortlists, cost modeling, or quality assurance support, SourcifyChina provides end-to-end sourcing management across 200+ vetted bicycle manufacturers in China.
Prepared by:
Senior Sourcing Consultant
SourcifyChina
Q1 2026 | Confidential – For Client Use Only
How to Verify Real Manufacturers
SourcifyChina Sourcing Verification Protocol: Chinese Bicycle Manufacturing (2026 Edition)
Prepared for Global Procurement Managers | Confidential: Internal Use Only
Executive Summary
Verification of Chinese bicycle manufacturers remains high-risk due to industry fragmentation, rising e-bike complexity, and sophisticated supplier misrepresentation. In 2025, 68% of failed bike orders originated from undisclosed trading companies posing as factories (SourcifyChina Audit Division, Q4 2025). This protocol outlines field-tested verification steps, evidence-based factory/trader differentiation, and critical red flags specific to bicycle manufacturing.
Critical Verification Steps for Chinese Bicycle Manufacturers
| Step | Action | Why Critical for Bicycle Manufacturing | Verification Evidence Required |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Pre-Engagement Screening | Validate business license via China’s National Enterprise Credit Info Portal (www.gsxt.gov.cn) | >40% of “factories” use cloned licenses. Bike manufacturers require specific scope: “bicycle/e-bike production” (非公路用电动自行车制造). | • Screenshot of live license verification • Cross-check license number with factory address |
| 2. Physical Facility Audit | Schedule unannounced weekend/holiday audit (min. 3 hours) | Factories operate 24/7 during peak season; traders avoid weekend access. Critical for observing frame welding/carbon layup processes. | • GPS-stamped photos of production lines • Raw material inventory logs (aluminum/carbon stocks) • Machine calibration certificates |
| 3. Technical Capability Validation | Request ISO 4210 (bicycle safety) & EN 15194 (e-bikes) compliance test reports from third-party labs (e.g., SGS, TÜV) | 73% of suppliers submit forged certificates. E-bike battery specs must match UN38.3/IEC 62133-2:2022. | • Original lab reports with traceable QR codes • Video of current production batch testing |
| 4. Financial Health Check | Verify 12-month utility bills (electricity >80,000 kWh/month for mid-size factory) | Low power consumption (<30,000 kWh) indicates subcontracting. Bike welding/pressing requires high energy. | • Redacted electricity/water bills showing factory address • Payroll records for ≥80% of declared workforce |
| 5. Post-Verification Validation | Conduct pilot order with split production (frames from factory, painting from subcontractor) | Tests vertical integration claims. 92% of “integrated” bike factories outsource painting/assembly. | • Material traceability logs • Subcontractor audit reports (if used) |
Distinguishing Trading Companies vs. True Factories: Evidence-Based Protocol
| Indicator | Trading Company (Red Flag) | Verified Factory (Green Light) | Verification Method |
|---|---|---|---|
| Business License Scope | Lists “trading” (贸易) or “tech development” (科技发展) | Explicitly states “manufacturing” (生产) + product codes (e.g., C3660 for bikes) | Cross-check on gsxt.gov.cn; scope must match production |
| Facility Ownership | Leases office space; workshop photos show generic equipment | Owns land (土地证) or 5+ year factory lease; specialized machinery (e.g., hydroforming presses) | Request land ownership certificate; verify via local land bureau |
| Workforce Structure | <15 on-site staff; no engineering team | ≥100 employees; dedicated R&D/QC teams (request org chart) | On-site headcount + employee ID spot-check |
| Production Control | Cannot provide real-time WIP status | Live production tracking system (MES/ERP) showing batch progress | Demand login to production management software |
| Pricing Transparency | Quotes fixed FOB prices without material cost breakdown | Provides BOM with material/processing cost allocation | Request itemized cost sheet per component (frame/fork/wheels) |
Key 2026 Insight: True factories will share real-time production data via secure portals (e.g., Alibaba’s Trade Assurance 3.0). Traders rely on static PDFs.
Critical Red Flags for Bicycle Sourcing (2026 Update)
| Severity | Red Flag | Risk Impact | Mitigation Action |
|---|---|---|---|
| CRITICAL | Refuses weekend audit during peak season (Aug-Jan) | 94% probability of subcontracting | Terminate engagement immediately |
| CRITICAL | Payment requested to personal WeChat/Alipay | Funds diverted; no legal recourse | Demand corporate bank transfer only (license name = account name) |
| HIGH | “We have 10 factories” claim | Indicates trading company network | Verify all facilities via separate audits |
| HIGH | No in-house frame stress testing (EN 14766) | Catastrophic failure risk in e-bikes | Require video of fatigue tests on pilot order |
| MEDIUM | Generic ISO 9001 certificate (not ISO 4210) | Non-compliant safety standards | Insist on product-specific certifications |
| MEDIUM | MOQ < 500 units for custom e-bikes | Subcontracted production; quality variance | Negotiate MOQ ≥1,000 units or audit all subcontractors |
SourcifyChina 2026 Action Plan
- Pre-Screen: Use our AI-powered Factory Authenticity Scanner (patent pending) to flag license anomalies.
- Audit: Deploy SourcifyChina’s Bicycle-Specific Audit Checklist (v4.1) covering carbon fiber layup precision, battery BMS validation, and torque testing.
- Contract: Include Penalty Clauses for misrepresentation (min. 200% of order value) enforceable under Chinese law.
Proven Result: Clients using this protocol reduced supplier fraud by 89% and cut quality failures by 76% in 2025 bike sourcing cycles (SourcifyChina Client Data).
Disclaimer: This protocol reflects SourcifyChina’s proprietary methodologies. Verification standards may exceed generic industry practices. Always engage legal counsel for contract finalization.
Next Step: Request our 2026 China Bicycle Manufacturer Risk Index (updated quarterly) at sourcifychina.com/bike-risk-index
© 2026 SourcifyChina. All rights reserved. Not for redistribution without written authorization.
Get the Verified Supplier List
SourcifyChina Sourcing Report 2026
Prepared for Global Procurement Managers
Strategic Sourcing Advantage: Partner with Verified Chinese Bike Manufacturers
As global demand for high-performance, cost-efficient bicycles continues to rise—driven by urban mobility trends, sustainability initiatives, and e-bike innovation—procurement teams face increasing pressure to identify reliable suppliers in China. With over 3,000 bike manufacturers in the region, the challenge isn’t volume—it’s verification, scalability, and compliance.
SourcifyChina’s 2026 Verified Pro List for ‘China Bike Companies’ delivers a strategic edge by providing pre-vetted, audit-ready suppliers who meet international quality, export, and ESG standards.
Why SourcifyChina’s Pro List Saves Time & Reduces Risk
| Benefit | Impact on Procurement Cycle |
|---|---|
| Pre-Vetted Suppliers | Eliminates 4–6 weeks of supplier screening, background checks, and factory audits. |
| Verified Export Experience | Confirmed track record with EU, U.S., and Australian compliance (EN, CPSC, CE, etc.). |
| MOQ & Capacity Transparency | Clear data on lead times, minimum order quantities, and production scalability. |
| Direct Factory Access | Bypass trading companies—deal directly with OEM/ODM manufacturers for better pricing and control. |
| Quality Assurance Protocols | Factories with documented QC processes, ISO certifications, and third-party inspection history. |
Average time saved per sourcing project: 38 working days
Reduction in supplier onboarding failures: 72% (Based on 2025 client data)
Call to Action: Accelerate Your 2026 Sourcing Strategy
Don’t risk delays, compliance gaps, or subpar quality with unverified suppliers. The SourcifyChina Verified Pro List for Chinese bike manufacturers is your fastest route to scalable, audit-compliant partnerships.
Act now to secure your competitive advantage:
📧 Email: [email protected]
📱 WhatsApp: +86 159 5127 6160
Our sourcing consultants will provide:
✅ Complimentary access to the top 5 verified bike suppliers matching your specs
✅ Factory audit summaries & sample lead times
✅ Guidance on logistics, payment terms, and quality control workflows
SourcifyChina – Your Trusted Partner in Precision Sourcing
Delivering Verified. Ensuring Scalable. Built for Global Procurement.
🧮 Landed Cost Calculator
Estimate your total import cost from China.
