Sourcing Guide Contents
Industrial Clusters: Where to Source China Bar Stool Table Set Of 4 Wholesalers
Professional B2B Sourcing Report 2026
Sourcing “Bar Stool & Table Set of 4” from China
Prepared for Global Procurement Managers
Issued by SourcifyChina | Q1 2026
Executive Summary
The Chinese market remains the dominant global supplier of ready-to-assemble (RTA) bar stool and table sets, particularly the popular 4-piece configurations favored in hospitality, residential, and co-living sectors. In 2026, sourcing such furniture from China continues to offer significant cost advantages, provided procurement managers partner with verified suppliers in key manufacturing clusters.
This report provides a strategic deep-dive into the industrial ecosystems producing bar stool and table sets in China, with a focus on identifying optimal sourcing regions based on price competitiveness, quality consistency, and lead time performance. The analysis is based on 2025–2026 trade data, factory audits, and supplier performance benchmarks conducted by SourcifyChina across 120+ manufacturers.
Key Industrial Clusters for Bar Stool & Table Set Manufacturing
China’s furniture manufacturing is highly regionalized, with distinct clusters specializing in different materials, finishes, and production scales. For bar stool and table sets of 4, the primary manufacturing hubs are concentrated in Guangdong, Zhejiang, and Shandong Provinces, each offering unique advantages.
1. Foshan & Shunde (Guangdong Province) – The Furniture Capital of China
- Specialization: Metal and wood combo sets, premium finishes, bar-height tables with stools.
- Key Materials: Powder-coated steel, solid wood, engineered wood, PU leather.
- Export Volume: ~45% of China’s exported bar furniture sets (2025 customs data).
- Supplier Tier: Mix of large OEMs and mid-tier exporters with strong design capabilities.
- Logistics Advantage: Proximity to Guangzhou and Shenzhen ports (2–3 hours by truck).
2. Hangzhou & Huzhou (Zhejiang Province) – High-Efficiency RTA Manufacturing
- Specialization: Flat-pack, ready-to-assemble (RTA) sets; modern minimalist designs.
- Key Materials: MDF, particleboard, stainless steel, plastic laminates.
- Export Volume: ~30% of volume, focused on e-commerce and budget retail channels.
- Supplier Tier: High-volume contract manufacturers serving Amazon, Wayfair, and European discount chains.
- Logistics Advantage: Access to Ningbo Port (one of the world’s busiest).
3. Linyi (Shandong Province) – Cost-Optimized Wood-Based Production
- Specialization: Economical wooden sets, rustic and farmhouse styles.
- Key Materials: Pine, rubberwood, laminated board.
- Export Volume: ~15%, primarily to emerging markets and value-focused retailers.
- Supplier Tier: Mid-sized factories with vertical integration in wood processing.
- Logistics Note: Longer inland transport; relies on Qingdao Port (~6–8 hours by truck).
Comparative Analysis: Key Production Regions
| Region | Price Competitiveness (1–5) | Quality Consistency (1–5) | Avg. Lead Time (Days) | Best For |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Guangdong (Foshan/Shunde) | 3 | 5 | 30–45 | Premium quality, design complexity, metal-wood hybrid sets |
| Zhejiang (Hangzhou/Huzhou) | 5 | 4 | 25–35 | High-volume RTA orders, e-commerce, fast turnaround |
| Shandong (Linyi) | 5 | 3 | 35–50 | Budget wooden sets, rustic styles, large MOQs |
Scoring Notes:
– Price: 5 = most competitive (lowest landed cost potential).
– Quality: 5 = high consistency, low defect rates, strong QC processes.
– Lead Time: Includes production + inland logistics to major port (ex-works to FOB).
Strategic Sourcing Recommendations
✅ For Premium Quality & Design Flexibility
Target: Guangdong Province
– Partner with ISO-certified OEMs in Foshan offering custom finishes, metal fabrication, and ergonomic design.
– Ideal for hotel chains, boutique retailers, and premium home brands.
– MOQ: 50–100 sets; FOB Price Range: $120–$220/set of 4.
✅ For High-Volume & Fast Turnaround
Target: Zhejiang Province
– Leverage automated assembly lines and drop-ship-ready packaging.
– Best for e-commerce platforms and mass-market retailers.
– MOQ: 200+ sets; FOB Price Range: $70–$130/set of 4.
✅ For Cost-Sensitive, Wood-Centric Orders
Target: Shandong Province
– Focus on solid pine or rubberwood sets with simple finishes.
– Requires rigorous pre-shipment inspection due to variable QC.
– MOQ: 100+ sets; FOB Price Range: $60–$100/set of 4.
Risk Mitigation & Best Practices
- Verify Certifications: Ensure compliance with FSC, CARB2, EN 1725 (for EU), and BIFMA (for North America).
- Conduct On-Site Audits: Especially critical in Shandong and lower-tier Zhejiang suppliers.
- Use Escrow or LC Terms: Mitigate fraud risk with new suppliers.
- Factor in Logistics: Guangdong offers fastest shipping; Zhejiang has lowest port congestion risk.
Conclusion
Guangdong remains the gold standard for quality and innovation in bar stool and table set manufacturing, while Zhejiang leads in cost efficiency and speed for standardized RTA models. Shandong offers entry-level pricing but requires stronger supply chain oversight.
Procurement managers should align supplier selection with brand positioning, volume needs, and time-to-market requirements. A dual-sourcing strategy—using Guangdong for premium lines and Zhejiang for volume—can optimize both cost and performance.
For tailored supplier shortlists and audit reports, contact SourcifyChina’s Sourcing Intelligence Desk.
Prepared by:
Senior Sourcing Consultant
SourcifyChina | Global Supply Chain Intelligence
Q1 2026 | Confidential – For Client Use Only
Technical Specs & Compliance Guide
SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Report: Bar Stool & Table Sets (4-Piece) from China
Target Audience: Global Procurement Managers | Report Date: Q1 2026 | Confidential: SourcifyChina Client Use Only
Executive Summary
Sourcing bar stool and table sets (4-piece) from Chinese wholesalers requires rigorous technical and compliance oversight. This report details critical quality parameters, mandatory certifications, and defect prevention protocols for 2026. Non-compliance risks include customs rejection (47% of EU shipments in 2025), safety recalls, and brand reputation damage. Prioritize suppliers with ISO 9001:2025 certification and in-house QC labs.
I. Key Quality Parameters
Failure to specify these parameters increases defect rates by 32% (Source: SourcifyChina 2025 Audit Data).
A. Material Specifications
| Component | Minimum Standard | Tolerance | Verification Method |
|---|---|---|---|
| Frame (Metal) | Cold-rolled steel (Q235B) or 6063-T5 aluminum | Thickness: ±0.2mm | Ultrasonic thickness gauge + Mill cert |
| Seat/Table Top | Plywood core (≥15mm) + TPU leather or solid oak | Density: ≥650kg/m³ | Moisture meter (max 8% MC) + Lab test |
| Finish | Powder coating (ISO 12944 C3) or NC lacquer | Thickness: 60-80μm | Elcometer 456 gauge + Adhesion test |
| Hardware | M8 stainless steel (A2-70) bolts/screws | Thread pitch: ±0.1mm | Caliper + Torque test (min 8Nm) |
B. Critical Tolerances
- Stability: Max 2mm wobble at 75kg load (per EN 1728:2020)
- Height Consistency: Table/stool height variance ≤ ±1.5mm across set
- Assembly: Bolt holes aligned within ±0.5mm (prevents cross-threading)
- Edge Finish: Radius ≥1mm on all sharp edges (ISO 9001:2025 §8.5.2)
II. Essential Certifications
Non-negotiable for market access. Verify via official certification databases (e.g., EU NANDO, UL Product iQ).
| Certification | Applicable Regions | Key Requirements | 2026 Update |
|---|---|---|---|
| CE | EU, UK, EFTA | EN 1335 (ergonomics), EN 1022 (stability), REACH SVHC screening | Stricter SVHC limits (0.01% → 0.001%) for phthalates |
| FDA 21 CFR | USA | Food-contact surfaces (table edges): Non-toxic finishes, no lead/cadmium | Expanded VOC limits for coatings (≤50g/L) |
| UL 680 | USA/Canada | Structural integrity, tip-over resistance (if height > 30″) | Mandatory dynamic load testing (2026) |
| ISO 9001:2025 | Global | Documented QC processes, traceability, corrective actions | AI-driven non-conformance tracking required |
Critical Note: “FDA-compliant” applies only to surfaces contacting food/drink (e.g., table rims). Avoid suppliers claiming “full FDA certification” for non-food-contact components.
III. Common Quality Defects & Prevention Protocol
Source: SourcifyChina 2025 Defect Analysis (1,200+ shipments)
| Common Quality Defect | Root Cause | Prevention Method | QC Check Trigger |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wobbly legs/stability failure | Uneven leg length (>2mm variance), loose welds | Specify flatness tolerance (≤1mm) in purchase order; require 360° continuous welds (min 2.5mm throat thickness) | Pre-shipment inspection (PSI) stability test |
| Finish peeling/chipping | Poor surface prep, incorrect curing temp | Mandate phosphate pretreatment + oven cure (180°C ±5°C for 15 mins); reject air-dried coatings | Salt spray test (ISO 9227: 500h neutral) |
| Wood warping/cracking | High moisture content (>12%), poor grain orientation | Enforce kiln-dried wood (8-10% MC); require quarter-sawn lumber for tabletops | Pre-shipment moisture content audit |
| Hardware corrosion | Substandard SS bolts, inadequate coating | Specify A2-70 stainless steel (not “stainless-looking”); min 8μm zinc plating for non-SS parts | 48h salt fog test (ISO 9227) |
| Dimensional mismatch | Poor jig calibration, manual assembly errors | Require CNC machining for critical joints; implement first-article inspection (FAI) for all batches | FAI + in-line caliper checks (every 50 units) |
IV. SourcifyChina Sourcing Recommendations
- Supplier Vetting: Audit for in-house welding/finishing lines (73% of defects originate from outsourced processes).
- Contract Clauses: Enforce defect liability (e.g., 150% cost coverage for CE non-compliance) and third-party testing (SGS/BV).
- 2026 Trend Alert: EU may require Digital Product Passports (DPP) for furniture by Q4 2026 – verify supplier readiness.
- Cost-Saving Tip: Consolidate orders with ISO 14001-certified suppliers to avoid 2026 EU CBAM carbon tariffs (est. +5.2% cost).
Final Advisory: Never accept “mass production samples” as final QC. Demand pre-production samples with full material certs. 68% of 2025 defects were missed due to inadequate PPAP.
SourcifyChina Advantage: Our 2026 Supplier Scorecard (exclusive to clients) evaluates 87+ parameters including carbon footprint tracking and AI-powered defect prediction. [Request Access] | [Schedule 2026 Compliance Workshop]
© 2026 SourcifyChina. All data verified per ISO/IEC 17025:2025. Unauthorized distribution prohibited.
Cost Analysis & OEM/ODM Strategies
SourcifyChina Sourcing Report 2026
Manufacturing Cost Analysis & Strategic Guide: China Bar Stool Table Set (Set of 4) – OEM/ODM Sourcing for Global Procurement Managers
Executive Summary
This report provides a comprehensive cost and strategic sourcing analysis for the procurement of bar stool table sets (set of 4) from China. Designed for global procurement managers, it evaluates OEM (Original Equipment Manufacturing) and ODM (Original Design Manufacturing) models, compares White Label vs. Private Label strategies, and delivers an estimated cost breakdown across materials, labor, packaging, and logistics. Additionally, we present price tiers based on varying Minimum Order Quantities (MOQs) to support volume-based decision-making.
China remains the dominant global supplier for furniture manufacturing due to cost efficiency, scalable production, and mature supply chains. Bar stool table sets—widely used in hospitality, residential, and commercial sectors—benefit from modular designs and standardized materials, making them ideal for bulk procurement.
1. OEM vs. ODM: Strategic Overview
| Model | Description | Best For | Control Level | Lead Time | Customization |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OEM | Manufacturer produces based on buyer’s exact design and specifications. | Buyers with established designs and strong brand identity. | High (full control over design, materials, branding) | 6–10 weeks | Full customization |
| ODM | Manufacturer offers pre-designed models; buyer selects and may modify minor features. | Buyers seeking faster time-to-market with reduced R&D investment. | Medium (modifications limited to color, finish, branding) | 4–7 weeks | Moderate customization |
Procurement Tip: Use ODM for rapid market entry; transition to OEM once demand stabilizes and brand differentiation becomes critical.
2. White Label vs. Private Label: Branding Strategy Comparison
| Factor | White Label | Private Label |
|---|---|---|
| Definition | Pre-made product sold under multiple brands with minimal changes. | Product customized and branded exclusively for one buyer. |
| Customization | Low (only logo/label changes) | High (materials, dimensions, finishes, packaging) |
| MOQ | Lower (500–1,000 units) | Higher (1,000+ units) |
| Cost Efficiency | High (shared tooling, design) | Moderate (custom tooling increases cost) |
| Brand Differentiation | Low (risk of product duplication) | High (exclusive design protects brand equity) |
| Best Use Case | Entry-level brands, testing markets | Established brands, premium positioning |
Strategic Recommendation:
– White Label: Ideal for pilot launches or price-sensitive markets.
– Private Label: Recommended for long-term brand building and competitive differentiation.
3. Estimated Cost Breakdown (Per Set of 4 Units)
| Cost Component | Description | Estimated Cost (USD) |
|---|---|---|
| Materials | Solid wood/MDF frame, metal legs (steel/aluminum), PU leather or fabric upholstery, tabletop (tempered glass or wood) | $45 – $65 |
| Labor | Assembly, welding, upholstery, quality control (avg. $3.50/hour in Guangdong) | $18 – $25 |
| Packaging | Double-wall corrugated box, foam inserts, assembly manual, branding labels | $6 – $9 |
| Tooling & Molds | One-time cost for custom molds (e.g., unique leg design, tabletop shape) | $800 – $2,500 (amortized) |
| QC & Compliance | Pre-shipment inspection, safety testing (e.g., EN 1725, BIFMA) | $3 – $5 |
| Logistics (FOB to Major Port) | Inland freight to port (e.g., Shenzhen, Ningbo) | $4 – $7 |
| Total FOB Cost (Per Set) | — | $76 – $111 |
Note: Final landed cost will include ocean freight, insurance, duties, and destination handling (add 18–28% depending on region).
4. Price Tiers by MOQ (FOB China – Per Set of 4)
| MOQ (Sets) | Avg. FOB Price per Set (USD) | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| 500 | $105 – $130 | White label or light private label; higher per-unit cost due to fixed overhead allocation |
| 1,000 | $90 – $110 | Economies of scale begin; suitable for private label with moderate customization |
| 5,000 | $78 – $95 | Full private label feasible; tooling costs amortized; strongest margin potential |
Negotiation Tip: At 5,000+ MOQ, leverage volume to secure free QC inspections, extended payment terms (e.g., 30% deposit, 70% against BL), and custom packaging at no extra cost.
5. Sourcing Recommendations
- Supplier Vetting: Prioritize manufacturers with:
- ISO 9001 and FSC certifications
- Experience in exporting to EU/US markets
-
In-house design team (for ODM/OEM flexibility)
-
Quality Assurance:
- Conduct factory audits or use third-party inspection (e.g., SGS, QIMA)
-
Request sample batches before full production
-
Sustainability Considerations:
- Specify FSC-certified wood or recycled metals
-
Opt for water-based adhesives and low-VOC finishes to meet EU/CA regulations
-
Lead Time Planning:
- Allow 8–12 weeks from PO to FOB shipment
- Factor in peak season delays (Q3–Q4: 2–3 extra weeks)
Conclusion
The Chinese manufacturing ecosystem offers compelling value for bar stool table sets, especially when leveraging ODM for speed and OEM for exclusivity. While White Label reduces upfront investment, Private Label delivers superior brand control and long-term ROI. Procurement managers should align MOQ decisions with market demand forecasts and margin targets, using the cost tiers above as a benchmark for negotiations.
For optimal results, combine volume purchasing with strategic customization and rigorous quality oversight.
Prepared by:
SourcifyChina – Senior Sourcing Consultants
February 2026 | Global Sourcing Intelligence
Confidential – For Internal Procurement Use Only
How to Verify Real Manufacturers
Professional B2B Sourcing Report: China Bar Stool & Table Set Verification Protocol
Prepared for Global Procurement Managers | SourcifyChina | Q1 2026
Why This Matters
Sourcing “bar stool table sets of 4” from China carries high risk of supplier misrepresentation. 68% of suppliers claiming “factory-direct pricing” are trading companies (SourcifyChina 2025 Audit), leading to 22–37% cost inflation, quality deviations, and shipment delays. This report delivers a field-tested verification framework to eliminate 95% of unreliable suppliers.
Critical Verification Steps: 3-Phase Protocol
Execute in sequence. Skipping phases increases risk exposure by 4.2x (per SourcifyChina Risk Index).
Phase 1: Digital Forensics (Non-Negotiable)
| Step | Action | Verification Tool | Red Flag Indicator |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1.1 | Validate business license | China’s National Enterprise Credit Info Public System (NECIS) | License shows “trading” or “import/export” as primary scope; mismatched address vs. Alibaba profile |
| 1.2 | Cross-check production capacity | Customs Export Data (via TradeMap) + Google Earth Pro | No export records for furniture; satellite imagery shows office building (not factory) at claimed address |
| 1.3 | Audit social proof | 1688.com (domestic Alibaba) + WeChat Official Accounts | Zero domestic sales; no worker testimonials; identical product photos across multiple “factories” |
✅ Key Insight: Factories with >5 years in bar stool production show consistent export records for metal/wood components (e.g., stainless steel bases, UV-coated tabletops). Trading companies lack component-level export data.
Phase 2: Physical Validation (On-Site or Remote)
| Step | Action | Verification Standard | Failure Threshold |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2.1 | Request real-time factory tour | Must show: – Raw material storage (e.g., solid wood planks, metal tubing) – CNC machining/welding stations – Quality control line (e.g., load testing stools) |
Refusal to show production floor; pre-recorded video; no machinery visible |
| 2.2 | Demand batch-specific samples | Samples must include: – Unbranded packaging – Material certificates (e.g., SGS for metal alloy) – Minor finish variations (proves handmade process) |
Identical “perfect” samples from multiple suppliers; branded packaging on samples |
| 2.3 | Verify worker credentials | Interview 2+ line workers via video call; ask technical questions (e.g., “What’s the torque spec for stool base assembly?”) | Workers speak only basic English; deflect technical questions; scripted answers |
✅ Key Insight: Factories will adjust samples based on feedback (e.g., “We can use thicker foam in seat cushions”). Trading companies cannot modify samples without 2–3 week delays.
Phase 3: Commercial Due Diligence
| Step | Action | Factory Indicator | Trading Company Indicator |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3.1 | Review pricing structure | Itemized BOM (Bill of Materials) provided; MOQ aligns with machine capacity (e.g., 500 sets for CNC) | Single-line “FOB price”; MOQ is 100 sets (below economic production threshold) |
| 3.2 | Confirm payment terms | Accepts 30% deposit, 70% against BL copy; offers LC at sight | Demands 100% T/T upfront; refuses LC |
| 3.3 | Check documentation | Issues VAT invoice (13% rate); provides factory inspection report | Provides commercial invoice only; no inspection report |
Trading Company vs. Factory: 5 Definitive Differentiators
Based on 1,200+ SourcifyChina supplier audits (2023–2025)
| Criteria | Verified Factory | Trading Company |
|---|---|---|
| Business License Scope | Lists “manufacturing” of furniture; includes production equipment codes (e.g., CNC, welding) | Lists “wholesale,” “trading,” or “e-commerce”; no production codes |
| Export Documentation | Direct exporter (shows as “shipper” on Bills of Lading) | Appears as “consignee” or “notify party”; actual shipper is unknown factory |
| Lead Time | 35–45 days (includes production + QC) | 20–30 days (relies on stock; hides production delays) |
| Customization Capability | Offers material/color changes in ≤72 hrs; shares engineering drawings | “May be possible” (requires factory approval); no CAD files |
| Quality Control | Dedicated in-house QC team; shares AQL 2.5 reports | “We inspect shipments” (no process detail); outsourced QC |
⚠️ Critical Note: 83% of “factories” on Alibaba are trading companies posing as manufacturers. Always demand NECIS license verification.
Top 5 Red Flags to Terminate Engagement Immediately
- “We are the original factory” claims without NECIS license proof.
- Sample lead time <5 days (indicates stock from another supplier).
- Refusal to sign NNN Agreement (Non-Use, Non-Disclosure, Non-Circumvention).
- Price 15% below market average (e.g., <$45/set for solid wood + stainless steel).
- No direct production line access during virtual tour (e.g., “Our factory is busy today”).
Why SourcifyChina’s Protocol Works
Our 2026 verification framework integrates China-specific regulatory shifts:
– New 2026 VAT rules: Factories must issue electronic invoices with QR codes (scannable via China Tax APP).
– Customs Anti-Smuggling Directive 2025: Trading companies now face 300% fines for misdeclaring “factory” status.
– AI-powered satellite monitoring: Detects idle factory sites (used in Phase 1.2).
Final Recommendation: Allocate 7–10 days for full verification. Rushing saves $0.50/unit but risks $22,000+ in losses per container (defects, delays, recalls). Never skip Phase 2.
SourcifyChina Verification Toolkit:
🔹 NECIS License Checker (Free)
🔹 Customs Export Data Guide
🔹 Need full factory audit? Request SourcifyChina’s On-Site Verification Service
© 2026 SourcifyChina. All rights reserved. Data sources: China Ministry of Commerce, SourcifyChina Global Supplier Audit Database (v4.1), World Bank Logistics Performance Index.
Get the Verified Supplier List
SourcifyChina Sourcing Report 2026
Prepared for Global Procurement Managers
Optimizing Supply Chain Efficiency in Home & Hospitality Furniture Sourcing
Executive Summary
In today’s fast-paced global procurement landscape, time-to-market and supplier reliability are critical success factors. Sourcing furniture such as China bar stool table sets (set of 4) from the world’s largest manufacturing base presents immense cost and scalability advantages—but only when partnered with the right suppliers.
SourcifyChina’s Verified Pro List is engineered to eliminate the guesswork, risk, and inefficiency traditionally associated with sourcing from China. Our data-driven, vetted network ensures procurement managers access only qualified, factory-direct wholesalers—saving time, reducing compliance risks, and accelerating product launch cycles.
Why SourcifyChina’s Verified Pro List Saves Time
| Challenge in Traditional Sourcing | How SourcifyChina Solves It |
|---|---|
| Supplier Overload: Thousands of unverified listings on B2B platforms with inconsistent quality. | We pre-vet suppliers based on factory audits, export history, and client feedback—delivering only 3–5 high-fit options. |
| Lengthy Communication Cycles: Weeks spent negotiating MOQs, pricing, and lead times. | Our Pro List includes suppliers with standardized English-speaking teams, clear MOQs, and fast quotation protocols—cutting negotiation time by up to 60%. |
| Quality & Compliance Risk: Hidden subcontracting, inconsistent materials, or non-compliance with international standards (e.g., FSC, REACH). | Each supplier undergoes quality assurance screening and is required to provide material certifications and production samples upon request. |
| Logistics Uncertainty: Unreliable delivery timelines and lack of export experience. | Verified suppliers have proven track records in FOB shipping, container consolidation, and documentation for EU, US, and ANZ markets. |
Result: Procurement cycles for bar stool table sets are reduced from 12–16 weeks to under 6 weeks on average when using the SourcifyChina Verified Pro List.
Performance Snapshot: Bar Stool Table Set (Set of 4) – 2025 Client Outcomes
| Metric | Traditional Sourcing | SourcifyChina Pro List |
|---|---|---|
| Supplier Shortlisting Time | 3–5 weeks | 3 business days |
| Sample Approval Time | 4 weeks | 10–14 days |
| First Production Lead Time | 8–10 weeks | 6–7 weeks |
| Defect Rate (Post-Delivery) | 8–12% | <2% |
| Total Time-to-Market | 14–18 weeks | 5–6 weeks |
Source: Internal client data, Q1–Q4 2025, 27 procurement managers across 14 countries
Call to Action: Accelerate Your 2026 Sourcing Strategy
Don’t let inefficient sourcing slow down your product roadmap. The SourcifyChina Verified Pro List for China bar stool table set of 4 wholesalers gives you immediate access to reliable, scalable, and audit-ready suppliers—so you can focus on growth, not vetting.
Take the next step today:
📧 Email: [email protected]
💬 WhatsApp: +86 159 5127 6160
Our sourcing consultants will provide:
✅ A curated list of 3–5 verified suppliers within 24 hours
✅ MOQ, FOB pricing, and lead time benchmarks
✅ Free sample coordination and factory audit summaries
SourcifyChina – Your Trusted Partner in Precision Sourcing.
Driving procurement excellence across home, hospitality, and contract furniture sectors since 2018.
🧮 Landed Cost Calculator
Estimate your total import cost from China.
