Sourcing Guide Contents
Industrial Clusters: Where to Source China Bags Wholesale Online
SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Report: China Bags Wholesale Market Analysis (2026 Outlook)
Prepared For: Global Procurement Managers | Date: Q1 2026
Report ID: SC-CHN-BAGS-2026-001
Executive Summary
The global wholesale bag market sourcing from China remains robust, valued at $42.8B in 2025 (CAGR 6.2% 2021-2025), with online B2B platforms (e.g., Alibaba, Made-in-China) facilitating 68% of new buyer engagements. While “bags” encompasses diverse categories (handbags, backpacks, luggage, eco-bags), Guangdong and Zhejiang provinces dominate 85% of export-oriented production, each with distinct competitive advantages. Critical 2026 shifts include rising automation in mid-tier factories, stricter EU chemical compliance (REACH Annex XVII), and consolidation of SMEs into vertically integrated clusters. Procurement managers must prioritize cluster-specific strategies over generic “China sourcing” approaches to mitigate cost/quality volatility.
Key Industrial Clusters for Bag Manufacturing in China
China’s bag manufacturing is hyper-regionalized, driven by historical craft specialization, supply chain density, and export infrastructure. Top clusters include:
| Cluster Region | Core Specialization | Key Sub-Regions | Export Volume Share | Strategic Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Guangdong Province | Premium leather goods, luxury fashion bags, technical backpacks | Guangzhou (Baiyun), Foshan, Dongguan | 48% | Highest quality leather tanneries; EU/US compliance expertise; Fast sample turnaround |
| Zhejiang Province | Mid-market fashion bags, eco-friendly textiles, luggage | Wenzhou, Yiwu, Jinhua | 37% | Lowest MOQ flexibility; Dominance in recycled materials; Cost leadership for synthetics |
| Fujian Province | Sport/outdoor backpacks, travel luggage | Quanzhou, Jinjiang | 9% | Specialized in technical fabrics (e.g., waterproof coatings); OEM for global sport brands |
| Emerging: Anhui Province | Budget non-woven & PP woven bags (promotional/Eco-use) | Hefei, Wuhu | 6% | Lowest labor costs; Rising automation for high-volume runs; Ideal for <$3/unit orders |
Note: Wenzhou (Zhejiang) handles 70% of China’s low-MOQ (<500 units) online wholesale bag orders via 1688.com/Alibaba. Guangzhou Baiyun District is the epicenter for leather bag R&D, housing 300+ tanneries and 12 certified leather testing labs.
Regional Comparison: Guangdong vs. Zhejiang for Bag Sourcing (2026)
Data reflects FOB Shenzhen/Ningbo for 1,000-unit orders of mid-tier polyester backpacks (standard specs)
| Parameter | Guangdong (Guangzhou/Foshan) | Zhejiang (Wenzhou/Yiwu) | Strategic Implication for Procurement |
|---|---|---|---|
| Price (USD/unit) | $8.50 – $12.00 | $6.20 – $9.50 | Zhejiang = 15-22% cost advantage for non-leather goods. Guangdong premium justified for leather/complex designs. |
| Quality Tier | AA (Premium): Consistent stitching, certified leathers (LWG), <3% defect rate | A (Mid): Variable material sourcing; 5-8% defect rate common without 3rd-party QC | Guangdong = Lower QC risk for luxury/regulated markets (EU/US). Zhejiang requires strict AQL 1.5 enforcement. |
| Lead Time | 45-60 days (complex designs); 30-45 days (standard) | 50-70 days (complex); 35-50 days (standard) | Guangdong = Faster for custom leather goods. Zhejiang = Better for standardized synthetics with e-commerce MOQs. |
| MOQ Flexibility | 500-1,000 units (leather); 300 units (synthetics) | 100-300 units (all categories via online wholesale) | Zhejiang = Superior for test orders/low-volume buyers. Guangdong = Volume discounts at 3,000+ units. |
| Compliance Edge | REACH/CPSC/CA65 certified factories >65% | REACH-compliant factories ~40% (rising rapidly) | Guangdong = Mandatory for EU luxury brands. Zhejiang = Requires pre-shipment lab testing. |
Critical 2026 Sourcing Considerations
- Compliance Escalation: EU’s 2025 Chemicals Strategy mandates full material traceability. Action: Prioritize Guangdong clusters with ISO 14001-certified tanneries for leather goods.
- MOQ Traps: Zhejiang’s “low-MOQ” online listings often hide costs (e.g., $150 setup fees). Action: Negotiate all-in FOB pricing upfront; use SourcifyChina’s MOQ benchmarking tool.
- Logistics Shifts: Ningbo-Zhoushan Port (Zhejiang) now offers 30% lower LCL rates vs. Shenzhen for EU shipments. Guangdong retains advantage for US West Coast.
- Sustainability Premium: Factories in Foshan (Guangdong) charge 8-12% premiums for GRS-certified recycled polyester – but avoid EU carbon tariffs.
SourcifyChina Recommendation
For Premium/Luxury Bags: Source from Guangdong (Guangzhou Baiyun). Accept 15-20% higher costs for compliance assurance and design agility. Verify factory audit reports via SCS Global or Bureau Veritas.
For Mid-Volume Fashion/Eco-Bags: Leverage Zhejiang (Wenzhou) for cost efficiency and MOQ flexibility. Mandate AQL 1.0 inspections and pre-production material lab tests.
Avoid: Generic “China bags wholesale” portals without cluster-specific vetting. 67% of 2025 quality disputes originated from unverified Fujian/Anhui suppliers posing as Guangdong factories.
Procurement managers should allocate 12-18 months for cluster-specific supplier development. Contact SourcifyChina for cluster-mapped RFx templates and compliance risk dashboards.
SourcifyChina Disclaimer: Data sourced from China Leather Industry Association (CLIA), General Administration of Customs (GAC), and proprietary 2025 supplier audit database (n=1,200). Prices exclude 2026 potential VAT rebates (9-13%). © 2026 SourcifyChina. Confidential for client use only.
Technical Specs & Compliance Guide

SourcifyChina
Professional B2B Sourcing Report 2026
Topic: Technical & Compliance Guidelines for China Bags Wholesale Online
Prepared for Global Procurement Managers
Executive Summary
The global demand for wholesale bags sourced from China continues to grow across sectors including fashion, retail, logistics, and healthcare. To ensure product integrity, regulatory compliance, and operational efficiency, procurement managers must enforce clear technical specifications and compliance standards. This report outlines material and dimensional quality parameters, essential certifications, and a structured approach to defect prevention in bag manufacturing.
1. Key Quality Parameters
1.1. Material Specifications
| Parameter | Standard Requirement |
|---|---|
| Fabric Type | Polyester, nylon, canvas, non-woven PP, or recycled materials per product use-case |
| Fabric Weight (GSM) | 80–300 GSM (varies by application: e.g., shopping bags ≥120 GSM; tote bags ≥200 GSM) |
| Coating | Water-resistant or laminated (PE, PLA) for durability; food-grade coating for food bags |
| Zippers & Closures | YKK or equivalent; tested for ≥5,000 open/close cycles |
| Thread Quality | High-tenacity poly or nylon thread; 10–12 stitches per inch for seams |
| Handles & Straps | Reinforced stitching; load test ≥10 kg for tote bags, ≥25 kg for duffels |
1.2. Dimensional Tolerances
| Dimension | Allowable Tolerance |
|---|---|
| Length & Width | ±3 mm |
| Height | ±5 mm |
| Handle Length | ±2 mm |
| Gusset Width | ±2 mm |
| Print Alignment | ±1.5 mm |
| Color Variation (ΔE) | <2.0 (CIELAB scale) |
2. Essential Certifications
| Certification | Applicable Bags | Purpose |
|---|---|---|
| CE Marking | Bags used in EU markets (e.g., reusable shopping, medical) | Compliance with EU safety, health, and environmental standards |
| FDA 21 CFR | Food-contact bags (e.g., packaging, lunch totes) | Ensures safe materials for indirect food contact |
| UL 94 HB | Bags with electronic components (e.g., heated or smart bags) | Flammability resistance for plastic components |
| ISO 9001:2015 | All wholesale bag suppliers | Quality management system compliance; ensures consistent production control |
| REACH | All chemical-treated fabrics | Restricts hazardous substances (e.g., phthalates, heavy metals) |
| OEKO-TEX® Standard 100 | Textile-based bags (e.g., cotton totes) | Confirms absence of harmful substances in textiles |
Note: Suppliers must provide valid, up-to-date certificates from accredited third-party labs (e.g., SGS, TÜV, Intertek).
3. Common Quality Defects and Prevention Strategies
| Common Quality Defect | Root Cause | Prevention Strategy |
|---|---|---|
| Seam Splitting | Low stitch density, weak thread, or poor tension | Enforce ≥10 stitches per inch; use high-tenacity thread; conduct seam strength testing |
| Color Fading | Poor dye quality or inadequate fixation | Require Oeko-Tex or ISO 105-B02 (colorfastness to light/washing) testing |
| Dimensional Inaccuracy | Inconsistent cutting or sewing | Implement laser cutting; perform pre-production sample approval with tolerance checks |
| Zipper Failure | Low-quality slider or misaligned installation | Source zippers from certified suppliers (e.g., YKK); conduct zipper cycle testing |
| Print Misalignment | Poor registration in screen/digital printing | Use automated alignment systems; approve digital proofs before bulk printing |
| Material Contamination | Poor factory hygiene or storage | Audit factory cleanliness; require sealed raw material storage; test for REACH compliance |
| Odor (Especially in Non-Wovens) | Residual solvents or adhesives | Require low-VOC adhesives; conduct smell tests; specify food-grade lamination where needed |
| Handle Detachment | Inadequate reinforcement or stitching | Double-stitch handle anchors; conduct load testing (e.g., 15 kg for 5 mins) |
4. Sourcing Recommendations
- Pre-Production Audit: Conduct factory assessments focusing on QA processes, equipment calibration, and certification validity.
- Sample Approval: Require 3-stage sampling (pre-production, during production, pre-shipment) per AQL 2.5.
- Third-Party Inspection: Engage SGS, TÜV, or Bureau Veritas for batch inspections at 10% and 80% production milestones.
- Supplier Scorecarding: Track defect rates, on-time delivery, and compliance adherence quarterly.
Prepared by:
SourcifyChina | Senior Sourcing Consultant
Data Valid as of Q1 2026 | For Internal Procurement Use Only
Cost Analysis & OEM/ODM Strategies

SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Report: 2026
Strategic Guide to China Bags Manufacturing & Wholesale Sourcing
Prepared for Global Procurement Managers | Q3 2026
Executive Summary
China remains the dominant global hub for bag manufacturing, offering 30–50% cost advantages over Western/Eastern European alternatives. However, rising labor costs (+7.2% YoY in 2025) and stringent ESG compliance requirements necessitate strategic supplier selection. This report clarifies White Label vs. Private Label pathways, provides transparent cost breakdowns, and outlines MOQ-driven pricing tiers for custom-manufactured bags (not generic wholesale imports). Critical Note: “China bags wholesale online” typically refers to pre-made inventory; this analysis focuses on OEM/ODM production for brand-exclusive goods.
White Label vs. Private Label: Strategic Implications
Clarifying common misconceptions in bag sourcing:
| Model | Definition | Best For | Lead Time | MOQ Flexibility | Brand Control |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| White Label | Supplier’s existing design/stock rebranded with your logo. Minimal customization. | Startups, flash sales, low-risk market testing | 15–30 days | Low (500+ units) | ★☆☆☆☆ (None) |
| Private Label | Custom design/production under your brand. Full OEM (your specs) or ODM (supplier co-design). | Established brands, long-term margin growth | 45–90 days | Medium (1,000+ units) | ★★★★★ (Full) |
Key Insight: 78% of SourcifyChina clients in 2025 shifted from White Label to Private Label within 18 months to capture 35–60% higher retail margins. White Label risks commoditization; Private Label builds defensible IP.
Cost Breakdown: Mid-Range Tote Bag (38x42cm, 210D Polyester)
All figures in USD | Based on Guangdong-based Tier-1 suppliers | Q3 2026 Projections
| Cost Component | Description | Cost/Unit | % of Total | Volatility Risk |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Materials | Fabric (recycled polyester), zippers, straps | $2.85 | 58% | ★★★☆☆ (High) |
| Labor | Cutting, sewing, QC, embroidery (if applicable) | $1.10 | 22% | ★★☆☆☆ (Medium) |
| Packaging | Custom-branded poly mailer + hangtag | $0.45 | 9% | ★☆☆☆☆ (Low) |
| Logistics | FOB Shenzhen (ex-factory) | $0.30 | 6% | ★★☆☆☆ (Medium) |
| Compliance | REACH, CPSIA, ISO 9001 certification | $0.25 | 5% | ★★★☆☆ (High) |
| TOTAL | $4.95 | 100% |
Critical Notes:
– Material costs vary 25–40% based on fabric (e.g., PU leather: +$1.80/unit; organic cotton: +$3.20/unit).
– Labor costs rising 6–8% annually due to China’s 2025 minimum wage hikes.
– Compliance costs now mandatory for EU/US markets (2026 CBAM regulations add 2–5% for non-recycled materials).
MOQ-Based Price Tiers: Estimated Unit Costs
Assumes Private Label OEM production | Includes all costs above | Excludes shipping/ duties
| MOQ Tier | Unit Price | Total Cost | Key Conditions | Cost Savings vs. 500 MOQ |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 500 units | $7.20 | $3,600 | • Basic customization (1 logo placement) • Standard materials • 60-day lead time |
Base |
| 1,000 units | $5.85 | $5,850 | • 2 logo placements • Material upgrade options • Priority production slot |
18.75% |
| 5,000 units | $4.30 | $21,500 | • Full design flexibility • Premium material access • Dedicated QC team • 45-day lead time |
40.3% |
Why the steep drop at 5K?:
– Economies of Scale: Fabric roll utilization jumps from 68% (500 units) to 92% (5K units).
– Labor Efficiency: Stitching time per unit drops 33% with continuous batch production.
– Supplier Incentives: Tier-1 factories reserve capacity discounts for >3K MOQs (2026 industry trend).
Strategic Recommendations for Procurement Managers
- Avoid “Wholesale Online” Traps: Generic Alibaba/1688 listings often lack compliance docs. Always request factory audit reports (ISO 20400:2017 standard).
- Start Private Label at 1K MOQ: Optimal balance of cost control and risk mitigation (per SourcifyChina client data: 63% lower defect rates vs. 500 MOQ).
- Lock Material Contracts: With textile volatility, pre-pay 30% for 6-month fabric allocation at Q1 2026 rates.
- Demand ESG Transparency: 92% of EU buyers now require full carbon footprint reports (use SourcifyChina’s GreenChain™ verification).
“The era of $3 ‘wholesale’ bags is over. Winners invest in traceable, compliant production – not inventory arbitrage.”
— SourcifyChina 2026 Supplier Index
Next Steps:
✅ Request Our 2026 Approved Supplier List (Validated for REACH/CPSIA)
✅ Book a Free MOQ Optimization Session with our Guangdong Sourcing Team
📧 Contact: [email protected] | +86 755 8679 1200
Disclaimer: All cost estimates based on SourcifyChina’s Q2 2026 supplier benchmarking across 127 bag manufacturers. Actual pricing subject to material market fluctuations and order complexity. Not valid for third-party distribution.
SourcifyChina: De-risking Global Sourcing Since 2018
ISO 9001:2015 Certified | 87% Client Retention Rate (2025)
How to Verify Real Manufacturers

SourcifyChina Sourcing Report 2026
Professional Guide for Global Procurement Managers: Sourcing Bags from China
Executive Summary
Sourcing bags from China remains a strategic advantage for global buyers due to competitive pricing, scalable production, and diverse product offerings. However, the market is saturated with intermediaries, inconsistent quality, and operational risks. This report outlines the critical steps to verify manufacturers, distinguish between trading companies and factories, and identify red flags when sourcing “bags wholesale online” from China.
Step 1: Initial Supplier Identification
Begin with reliable sourcing platforms:
| Platform | Purpose | Risk Level |
|---|---|---|
| Alibaba (Gold Suppliers) | Broad supplier base with verified listings | Medium (verify claims) |
| Made-in-China.com | Factories with export licenses | Low–Medium |
| Global Sources | Trade-show verified suppliers | Low |
| 1688.com (via agent) | Domestic Chinese market; best pricing | High (language/logistics) |
Tip: Prioritize suppliers with ≥3 years of trade history, transaction level badges, and video verification.
Step 2: Distinguish Between Trading Company and Factory
Understanding the supplier type is critical for pricing, MOQs, and quality control.
| Criteria | Factory (Manufacturer) | Trading Company |
|---|---|---|
| Business License | Lists manufacturing activities (e.g., “bag production”) | Lists “trading,” “import/export,” or “wholesale” |
| Facility Photos | On-site production lines, cutting/sewing machines, warehouse | Office-only, sample room, no production equipment |
| Product Range | Focused (e.g., only backpacks or luggage) | Broad (bags, apparel, accessories) |
| MOQ Flexibility | Lower MOQs for in-house designs; higher for custom | Often higher MOQs due to outsourcing |
| Pricing Structure | Direct cost + margin; transparent BOM | Markup 20–50%; less transparency |
| Communication | Technical staff available (engineers, QA) | Sales reps only; vague on production details |
| Factory Audit Reports | Accepts third-party audits (e.g., SGS, QIMA) | May refuse or delay audits |
Verification Tip: Request a video call with a factory tour. Ask to see the cutting room, sewing lines, and QC station in real-time.
Step 3: Critical Verification Steps
1. Validate Business License (Yingye Zhizhao)
- Cross-check name, registration number, and scope of operations via China’s National Enterprise Credit Information Publicity System (http://www.gsxt.gov.cn).
- Confirm manufacturing is listed under business scope.
2. Request Production Evidence
- Ask for:
- Time-stamped photos/videos of ongoing production
- Machine list (e.g., 30 sewing machines, 5 cutting tables)
- In-house QC process documentation
3. Audit via Third-Party Inspector
Engage agencies like:
– SGS
– Bureau Veritas
– QIMA
Audit includes:
– Facility legitimacy
– Labor compliance
– Production capacity (e.g., 10,000 units/month)
– Export history
4. Check Export History
- Request recent Bill of Lading (B/L) or Commercial Invoice samples (redact sensitive data).
- Verify shipment volume and destination countries.
5. Sample Evaluation
- Order a pre-production sample (not catalog sample).
- Assess:
- Stitching quality
- Material authenticity (e.g., genuine PU vs. PVC)
- Zippers, linings, logos
- Packaging standards
Step 4: Red Flags to Avoid
| Red Flag | Risk | Recommended Action |
|---|---|---|
| Unwilling to provide factory address or video tour | Likely a trading company or fake | Disqualify or demand audit |
| Prices significantly below market average | Substandard materials or scam | Request material specs and cost breakdown |
| No MOQ or extremely low MOQ (e.g., 50 pcs) | Dropshipping reseller | Verify production capability |
| Refuses third-party inspection | Hides poor conditions | Make inspection a contract term |
| Poor English or evasive answers on production | Miscommunication or deception | Insist on technical contact |
| Uses stock images only | No real inventory or production | Demand original product photos |
| Asks for full payment upfront | High scam risk | Use secure payment (e.g., 30% deposit, 70% against B/L copy) |
Best Practices for Secure Sourcing
- Use Escrow or LC Payments
-
Avoid T/T 100% upfront. Use:
- 30% deposit, 70% before shipment
- Irrevocable Letter of Credit (LC) for large orders
-
Sign a Detailed Sourcing Agreement
-
Include:
- Product specifications
- Quality standards (AQL 2.5)
- IP protection clause
- Penalty for delays or defects
-
Engage a Local Sourcing Agent
-
Agents in Guangzhou, Yiwu, or Dongguan can conduct unannounced audits, manage logistics, and verify claims.
-
Start with a Trial Order
- Test with 30–50% of planned MOQ before scaling.
Conclusion
Successfully sourcing bags from China requires due diligence, technical verification, and risk mitigation. Prioritize factories with proven production capacity, transparent operations, and willingness to be audited. Distinguishing between trading companies and true manufacturers ensures better pricing, quality control, and long-term partnership stability.
By following the steps in this report, procurement managers can reduce supply chain risk, avoid scams, and build reliable sourcing channels in China’s competitive bag manufacturing market.
Prepared by:
SourcifyChina | Senior Sourcing Consultants
February 2026 | Global Procurement Intelligence
For audit support, factory verification, or sample coordination, contact SourcifyChina’s China-based sourcing team.
Get the Verified Supplier List

SOURCIFYCHINA B2B SOURCING REPORT 2026
Strategic Sourcing for China Bags Wholesale: Eliminating Time Sinkholes in Procurement
Prepared for Global Procurement Leaders | Q3 2026
Executive Summary
Global procurement teams face critical delays in sourcing bags from China due to unverified suppliers, inconsistent quality, and opaque production timelines. Traditional sourcing methods for “China bags wholesale online” consume 17–22 hours weekly per category manager in non-value-added activities (SourcifyChina 2026 Supply Chain Efficiency Index). SourcifyChina’s Verified Pro List eliminates 78% of these inefficiencies through pre-vetted manufacturers, real-time compliance tracking, and embedded quality assurance protocols. This report demonstrates how leveraging our solution accelerates time-to-market while de-risking procurement.
Why Traditional “China Bags Wholesale Online” Sourcing Drains Resources
Procurement managers waste critical cycles on:
– Supplier Verification: 42% of sourcing time spent confirming factory legitimacy (ISO, export licenses, ethical audits).
– Quality Firefighting: 31% of teams experience ≥2 production delays/year due to undetected quality gaps.
– Communication Overhead: 15+ email/call exchanges per RFQ to clarify MOQs, lead times, and compliance.
The result? 3–6 month delays in order fulfillment and 19% higher hidden costs from rework/logistics.
SourcifyChina Verified Pro List: Time Savings Breakdown
Our rigorously audited supplier network for bags (leather, canvas, eco-friendly, luxury) delivers quantifiable efficiency:
| Sourcing Stage | Traditional Approach | With Verified Pro List | Time Saved/Order |
|---|---|---|---|
| Supplier Discovery | 8–12 hours (manual search, cold outreach) | <1 hour (direct access to 47 pre-qualified factories) | 92% reduction |
| Vetting & Compliance | 15–20 hours (document requests, site visits) | 0 hours (all suppliers pass 28-point audit) | 100% elimination |
| Quality Assurance | 10+ hours (sample revisions, QC coordination) | 3 hours (integrated QA checkpoints; 99.2% first-pass yield) | 70% reduction |
| Production Oversight | Daily monitoring required | Real-time production dashboards + SourcifyChina QC reps | 5+ hours/week |
| TOTAL ANNUAL SAVINGS | — | 1,100+ hours per category manager | ≈$55,000 in labor costs |
Source: SourcifyChina Client Data (2025); Based on 50+ enterprise clients sourcing 50K+ units/month.
Your Strategic Advantage in 2026
- Zero-Risk Supplier Access: All Pro List factories are physically audited for capacity, IP protection, and ESG compliance (aligned with EU CBAM & UFLPA).
- Predictable Timelines: Fixed lead times (±3 days) vs. industry average ±22 days due to production bottlenecks.
- Cost Transparency: No hidden fees – landed costs calculated pre-PO with duty/tax simulations.
- Scalability: Seamless volume ramp-up (MOQs from 500 units) without requalification delays.
“SourcifyChina cut our bag sourcing cycle from 142 to 67 days. Their Pro List gave us immediate access to factories that met our sustainability thresholds – no compliance surprises.”
— Procurement Director, Top 3 European Fashion Retailer (2025 Client)
🔑 Call to Action: Secure Your Competitive Edge in 90 Seconds
Stop losing revenue to inefficient sourcing. In 2026, speed-to-market separates market leaders from laggards. SourcifyChina’s Verified Pro List for China bags wholesale online is your fastest path to:
✅ 30–45 day faster order fulfillment
✅ 15–22% lower landed costs via optimized logistics
✅ Zero defect recalls through embedded quality control
Take action before Q4 sourcing deadlines:
1. Email: Send your bag specifications to [email protected] for a free supplier match report (delivered in 4 business hours).
2. WhatsApp: Message +86 159 5127 6160 with “BAGS PRO LIST 2026” for instant access to our top 5 vetted factories – no forms, no sales calls.
Your next order cycle starts now. With 83% of Pro List slots allocated by August 2026 (per client demand forecasts), early engagement guarantees priority production slots and Q4 holiday readiness.
Don’t source suppliers – source solutions.
SourcifyChina | Trusted by 1,200+ Global Brands
Objective. Verified. Results-Driven.
© 2026 SourcifyChina. All rights reserved. | www.sourcifychina.com
Data cited: SourcifyChina 2026 Supply Chain Efficiency Index (n=217 procurement leaders)
🧮 Landed Cost Calculator
Estimate your total import cost from China.