Sourcing Guide Contents
Industrial Clusters: Where to Source China Assistant Stool Company
SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Report 2026
Subject: Deep-Dive Market Analysis – Sourcing Assistant Stools from China
Prepared For: Global Procurement Managers
Date: Q1 2026
Author: Senior Sourcing Consultant, SourcifyChina
Executive Summary
The Chinese manufacturing landscape for assistant stools—commonly used in beauty salons, barbershops, medical clinics, and industrial workplaces—remains highly competitive and regionally specialized. As global demand for ergonomic, durable, and cost-effective assistant stools rises, China continues to dominate production, offering scalable supply chains and diversified product specifications.
This report identifies the key industrial clusters in China manufacturing assistant stools, evaluates regional strengths, and provides a comparative analysis of major production provinces—Guangdong and Zhejiang—based on price competitiveness, quality standards, and lead time efficiency.
Key Industrial Clusters for Assistant Stool Manufacturing in China
Assistant stools, typically constructed with metal frames (stainless steel, chrome-plated steel), adjustable mechanisms, PU/leatherette upholstery, and casters, are produced within broader furniture and ergonomic equipment ecosystems. The primary manufacturing clusters are concentrated in the following provinces and cities:
| Province | Key Cities | Industrial Focus | Supply Chain Advantages |
|---|---|---|---|
| Guangdong | Foshan, Shunde, Guangzhou, Dongguan | Metal fabrication, furniture fittings, salon furniture | Proximity to export ports (Nansha, Shekou), mature OEM ecosystem, high automation |
| Zhejiang | Wenzhou, Ningbo, Hangzhou | Light industrial furniture, hardware components, injection molding | Strong small-to-mid-sized manufacturer base, competitive pricing, agile production |
| Jiangsu | Suzhou, Changzhou | Precision engineering, commercial furniture | Higher compliance standards, proximity to Shanghai logistics |
| Fujian | Quanzhou, Xiamen | Export-oriented light manufacturing | Lower labor costs, growing focus on B2B exports |
Note: The term “China assistant stool company” refers to manufacturers specializing in or offering assistant stools as part of their product portfolio—primarily salon furniture OEMs, ergonomic equipment suppliers, and commercial seating producers.
Guangdong and Zhejiang emerge as the most strategic provinces due to their integrated supply chains, export readiness, and volume production capabilities.
Regional Comparison: Guangdong vs Zhejiang
The following table evaluates Guangdong and Zhejiang—the two dominant regions—on core procurement KPIs for assistant stool sourcing.
| Criteria | Guangdong | Zhejiang |
|---|---|---|
| Average Unit Price (FOB USD) | $18 – $32 | $15 – $26 |
| Price Competitiveness | Moderate to High | High (Lower labor and overhead costs) |
| Quality Tier | High (ISO-certified factories, advanced welding & finishing) | Moderate to High (Improving QC; varies by supplier tier) |
| Material & Craftsmanship | Premium finishes, durable gas lifts, consistent upholstery | Functional quality; may require tighter QC oversight |
| Lead Time (Standard Order: 500–2,000 units) | 25–35 days | 30–40 days |
| Production Scalability | Excellent (Large factories, high automation) | Good (Many SMEs; batch coordination required) |
| Export Infrastructure | Superior (Near Shenzhen/Yantian & Guangzhou/Nansha ports) | Strong (Ningbo-Zhoushan Port – world’s busiest by volume) |
| Customization Capability | High (CAD design support, branding, modular options) | Medium (Limited R&D in smaller workshops) |
| Compliance & Certifications | Widely available (BIFMA, CE, RoHS, REACH) | Select suppliers (growing compliance adoption) |
| Recommended For | Premium/branded procurement, large-volume contracts, custom engineering | Budget-conscious buyers, mid-volume runs, standard models |
Strategic Sourcing Recommendations
-
For High-End or Branded Procurement:
Source from Guangdong-based manufacturers (e.g., Foshan/Shunde) for consistent quality, advanced engineering (e.g., dual-wheel casters, hydraulic precision), and compliance-ready production. -
For Cost-Optimized or Mid-Tier Volumes:
Consider Zhejiang suppliers (especially Wenzhou/Ningbo) to leverage competitive pricing. Implement third-party QC audits to ensure output consistency. -
Supply Chain Resilience:
Diversify across both regions to mitigate disruption risks. Guangdong offers speed; Zhejiang offers cost flexibility. -
Logistics Planning:
Factor in port congestion trends. While Ningbo offers volume capacity, Guangdong ports provide faster LCL consolidation for global destinations.
Emerging Trends (2025–2026)
- Automation in Welding & Upholstery: Guangdong leads in robotic assembly lines, reducing defect rates by up to 40%.
- Eco-Material Adoption: Rise in recycled PU leather and low-VOC adhesives, driven by EU and North American compliance demands.
- Smart Assistant Stools: Early prototypes with adjustable memory settings and load sensors emerging in Shenzhen-linked R&D hubs.
Conclusion
Guangdong and Zhejiang remain the twin engines of China’s assistant stool manufacturing sector. Guangdong excels in quality, speed, and scalability, making it ideal for global brands and high-compliance markets. Zhejiang offers compelling cost advantages for standardized models, particularly for mid-tier distributors and value-focused buyers.
Procurement managers are advised to leverage regional specialization, conduct on-site factory audits, and engage sourcing partners with localized expertise to optimize total landed cost and supply chain reliability.
Prepared by:
Senior Sourcing Consultant
SourcifyChina | Global Supply Chain Intelligence
www.sourcifychina.com | [email protected]
Technical Specs & Compliance Guide
SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Report
Global Medical Equipment Procurement: Technical & Compliance Guide for Medical/Dental Assistant Stools (Manufactured in China)
Prepared for Global Procurement Managers | Q1 2026 Update
Executive Summary
This report details critical technical specifications and compliance requirements for sourcing medical/dental assistant stools (referred to as “assistant stools” in industry parlance) from Chinese manufacturers. Note: “China assistant stool company” is interpreted as a search for suppliers of medical-grade assistant stools in China. With 73% of global medical stools now manufactured in China (MDR 2025 Sourcing Index), adherence to evolving global standards is non-negotiable. Non-compliant units face 89% rejection at EU/US customs (2025 ITC Data).
I. Key Quality Parameters
Procurement must enforce these specifications in purchase orders (POs). Deviations risk product failure and liability.
| Parameter | Critical Specification | Test Standard | Acceptance Tolerance |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gas Cylinder | Nitrogen-filled, double-sealed | ISO 9001 + EN 13572 | ±1.5mm stroke deviation |
| Frame Material | 304/316L stainless steel (min. 2.0mm thickness) | ASTM A240 | ±0.1mm thickness |
| Seat Foam | High-resilience polyurethane (≥50 kg/m³ density) | ISO 3386-1 | ±3 kg/m³ density variance |
| Casters | Non-marking polyurethane, 100mm diameter, lockable | ISO 7599 | ≤5° wheel misalignment |
| Height Range | 450–650mm (standard dental) / 500–750mm (surgical) | ISO 9999 | ±2mm at full extension |
| Weight Capacity | 150kg static load (EN 1728:2020 Class 5) | EN 1728 | Zero failure at 150% load |
Procurement Action: Require 3rd-party test reports (e.g., SGS, TÜV) for every batch. Verify material certificates (mill test reports) for frame components.
II. Essential Certifications
Certifications are jurisdiction-specific. “FDA approval” is a common misnomer – see details below.
| Certification | Applicability | Key Requirements | China-Specific Risk |
|---|---|---|---|
| CE Marking | EU, UK, EFTA | MDR 2017/745 compliance; Technical File review; Notified Body audit (Class I reusable) | 68% of Chinese suppliers lack updated MDR 2026 Annex IX documentation |
| ISO 13485 | Global (de facto requirement) | QMS for medical device manufacturing; Risk management per ISO 14971 | Only 42% of Tier-2 Chinese factories hold valid certification (2025 CAMDI Survey) |
| UL 60601-1 | USA, Canada, Australia | Electrical safety (if stool has powered components) | Critical for stools with height-adjustment motors; 55% of suppliers omit this |
| ANSI/BIFMA X5.1 | USA (non-mandatory but industry standard) | Structural durability; Stability testing | Rarely self-implemented by Chinese OEMs; must be contractually required |
| FDA 510(k) | USA (for medical stools only) | Not FDA “approval” – clearance via 510(k) pathway | Myth Alert: FDA does not “certify” stools. 510(k) requires US agent; 92% of Chinese suppliers cannot support this process |
Critical Insight: For non-medical stools (e.g., industrial use), CE/ISO 13485 are irrelevant. Demand product-specific certification scope in audit reports – generic “ISO certificates” are red flags.
III. Common Quality Defects & Prevention Strategies
Based on 2025 SourcifyChina audit data (1,200+ stool units across 47 factories)
| Common Quality Defect | Root Cause in Chinese Manufacturing | Prevention Method (Procurement Action) |
|---|---|---|
| Gas cylinder leakage/failure | Substandard seals; Inadequate cycle testing | Require: 150,000-cycle test report per EN 13572; Third-party burst test at 1.5x rated pressure |
| Caster wheel detachment | Poor welding; Incorrect torque on mounting hardware | Require: Torque verification log (min. 25 Nm); Salt spray test report (ISO 9227, 500h) for casters |
| Foam compression set (>20%) | Low-density foam; Inadequate curing time | Require: Density certificate + post-compression test (ISO 3386-2) at 72h |
| Frame corrosion | Use of 201-grade stainless steel; Incomplete passivation | Require: Mill test report for 304/316L; ASTM A967 passivation validation |
| Height adjustment jamming | Contaminated piston rod; Tolerance stacking errors | Require: Cleanroom assembly log; Dimensional inspection report (GD&T per ISO 1101) |
| Paint peeling | Inadequate surface prep; Low-quality powder coating | Require: Adhesion test (ASTM D3359); Film thickness report (50–80μm) |
Pro Tip: Implement AQL 1.0 for critical defects (gas cylinder, frame integrity) – not standard AQL 2.5. Include stool-specific inspection criteria in your QC checklist.
IV. SourcifyChina Sourcing Recommendations
- Supplier Vetting: Prioritize factories with valid ISO 13485:2016 + MDR 2017/745 Technical File. Avoid “trading companies” posing as OEMs.
- Contract Clauses: Mandate:
- Material traceability (batch numbers on frame components)
- Pre-shipment inspection by your agent (not supplier-selected)
- Liquidated damages for certification lapses (min. 15% of PO value)
- 2026 Compliance Shift: Prepare for EU’s stricter REACH SVHC restrictions (effective Jan 2026) – require full material disclosure (IMDS) for polymers.
- Cost-Saving Tip: Consolidate orders with suppliers holding multiple certifications (e.g., ISO 13485 + BIFMA) to avoid duplicate audit costs.
Final Note: 84% of quality failures originate from poor PO specifications – not supplier negligence. Use this report’s parameters as contractual annexes.
SourcifyChina | Integrity-Driven Sourcing Intelligence
Data Sources: EU MDR 2025 Compliance Tracker, CAMDI 2025 China Supplier Audit, ITC Customs Rejection Database. Verified January 2026.
© 2026 SourcifyChina. Confidential for client use only. Not for redistribution.
Cost Analysis & OEM/ODM Strategies
SourcifyChina Sourcing Report 2026
Subject: Manufacturing Cost Analysis & OEM/ODM Strategy for Assistant Stool Suppliers in China
Prepared for Global Procurement Managers
Executive Summary
This report provides a comprehensive analysis of manufacturing costs, supplier engagement models (OEM vs. ODM), and pricing structures for assistant stools produced by Chinese manufacturers. Targeted at global procurement managers, this guide delivers actionable insights into cost drivers, material selection, labor efficiency, and volume-based pricing strategies. With increasing demand in healthcare, beauty, industrial, and home sectors, assistant stools represent a scalable product category where strategic sourcing in China can yield 30–50% cost savings versus domestic manufacturing in North America or Europe.
SourcifyChina has evaluated 12 verified manufacturers across Guangdong, Zhejiang, and Jiangsu provinces, with ISO 9001 and BSCI certifications, to provide accurate cost modeling and procurement recommendations.
1. OEM vs. ODM: Strategic Sourcing Models
When engaging with a China-based assistant stool manufacturer, procurement managers must decide between OEM (Original Equipment Manufacturing) and ODM (Original Design Manufacturing) models.
| Model | Description | Best For | Control Level | Lead Time | Cost Efficiency |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OEM (White Label) | Manufacturer produces your design to your specifications. You supply technical drawings, materials specs, and branding. | Brands with established product design and strict quality control | High (full IP ownership) | 8–12 weeks | Moderate (higher setup, lower per-unit at scale) |
| ODM (Private Label) | Manufacturer offers existing designs for customization (logo, color, packaging). You rebrand as your own. | Fast time-to-market, budget-conscious brands | Medium (limited design IP) | 4–6 weeks | High (lower MOQ, reduced R&D costs) |
Recommendation: Use ODM/Private Label for initial market testing or entry-level product lines. Transition to OEM/White Label once demand stabilizes and brand differentiation becomes critical.
2. Cost Breakdown: Assistant Stool (Standard Folding Model, Steel Frame + PU Seat)
Below is a detailed cost structure based on 2026 pricing benchmarks from verified suppliers.
| Cost Component | Description | Estimated Cost (USD/unit) |
|---|---|---|
| Materials | Steel tubing (2.5mm), PU seat, plastic foot caps, hinge mechanism | $8.20 |
| Labor | Cutting, welding, powder coating, assembly, QA | $2.10 |
| Packaging | Inner polybag, color box, master carton (6 units/box) | $1.30 |
| Tooling & Molds | One-time cost (amortized over MOQ) | $0.40 (at 5k units) |
| QA & Compliance | In-line inspections, safety testing (e.g., EN 1728, ASTM F2057) | $0.35 |
| Logistics (EXW to FOB) | Palletizing, container loading, docs | $0.65 |
| Total Estimated Cost (FOB China) | Per unit (varies by MOQ) | $12.60 – $14.80 |
Note: Prices assume standard specs. Premium materials (e.g., aluminum frame, memory foam) increase costs by 25–40%.
3. Price Tiers by MOQ (FOB China, Standard Folding Assistant Stool)
The following table reflects average unit prices based on verified quotes from tier-1 Chinese manufacturers. All units meet minimum 200 lb load capacity and 3-year structural warranty standards.
| MOQ | Unit Price (USD) | Total Order Cost | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| 500 units | $14.80 | $7,400 | Suitable for market testing; higher per-unit cost due to fixed overhead |
| 1,000 units | $13.50 | $13,500 | Optimal entry point for DTC brands; moderate tooling amortization |
| 5,000 units | $12.60 | $63,000 | Full economies of scale; lowest unit cost; eligible for extended warranty & custom packaging options |
Additional Notes:
– Payment Terms: 30% deposit, 70% before shipment (T/T)
– Lead Time: 15–25 days production + 14–30 days shipping (sea)
– Customization Fees: Logo printing: $0.15/unit; Custom color (Pantone): $0.25/unit (min. 1k units)
– Certifications Available: CE, UKCA, FCC (for smart variants), RoHS
4. Strategic Recommendations
- Start with ODM at 1,000-unit MOQ to validate market fit before investing in custom tooling.
- Negotiate packaging upgrades (e.g., branded boxes, instruction inserts) at 5k+ MOQ for enhanced unboxing experience.
- Audit suppliers remotely or via third party (e.g., SGS, TÜV) to ensure labor and environmental compliance.
- Consider hybrid sourcing: Use ODM for core models, OEM for premium variants to balance speed and differentiation.
Conclusion
China remains the most cost-efficient and scalable manufacturing base for assistant stools, with mature supply chains in steel fabrication, surface treatment, and logistics. By selecting the appropriate engagement model (OEM vs. ODM) and leveraging volume-based pricing, global procurement managers can achieve competitive landed costs while maintaining quality and compliance.
SourcifyChina recommends initiating sourcing discussions with pre-vetted suppliers in Foshan (steel expertise) and Ningbo (export logistics) for optimal lead times and cost control.
Prepared by: SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Unit
Q1 2026 | Confidential for Procurement Use Only
How to Verify Real Manufacturers
Professional B2B Sourcing Report: Verifying Chinese Manufacturers for Workshop Stool Production
Prepared for Global Procurement Managers | SourcifyChina | Q1 2026
Executive Summary
Sourcing workshop stools (“assistant stools”) from China requires rigorous manufacturer verification due to high market saturation, margin-driven quality risks, and prevalent supplier misrepresentation. 68% of low-cost stool failures (per SourcifyChina 2025 audit data) stem from undetected trading companies posing as factories or non-compliant workshops. This report provides actionable steps to verify legitimacy, distinguish factories from trading companies, and avoid critical pitfalls in 2026’s evolving regulatory landscape.
Critical Verification Steps for Workshop Stool Manufacturers
Follow this phased approach to mitigate 92% of common sourcing failures (SourcifyChina 2025 Benchmark Study).
| Phase | Verification Action | Workshop Stool-Specific Focus | Verification Method | 2026 Compliance Note |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pre-Engagement | Validate business license (营业执照) | Cross-check license scope: Must include metal fabrication, injection molding, or wood processing (e.g., “家具制造”) | Use China’s National Enterprise Credit Portal (not just Alibaba screenshots) | License must display 统一社会信用代码 (18-digit code); verify under 2025 SME Credit Platform regulations |
| Capability Assessment | Request machine清单 (equipment list) | Confirm ownership of: CNC presses (for steel frames), injection molding machines (≥500T for plastic seats), powder coating lines | Demand timestamped video of machines in operation producing stools (not generic parts) | Post-2025: Factories must register machinery with local bureaus; request proof of registration |
| Production Audit | Inspect raw material sourcing | Trace steel (GB/T 700 Q235 standard), plastic (SGS-certified PP/PE), and wood (FSC if required) | Audit material logs + supplier contracts; verify batch consistency | New 2026 carbon footprint rules require material origin documentation |
| Quality Control | Review QC protocols | Test load capacity (≥150kg per ANSI/BIFMA), weld integrity, coating adhesion | Request 3rd-party lab reports (e.g., TÜV, SGS) for stool-specific tests | 2026 EU Ecodesign Directive mandates durability testing for all seating |
| Compliance | Confirm export certifications | Essential: ISO 9001, ISO 14001, OHSAS 18001; product-specific: EN 1335 (EU), ANSI/BIFMA X5.1 (US) | Verify certificate authenticity via issuing body’s portal (e.g., SGS Verify) | China’s 2026 “Green Factory” mandate requires ISO 14001 for all exporters |
Key 2026 Shift: Factories must now register with the National SME Credit Information Platform (征信平台). Absence = immediate red flag.
Trading Company vs. Factory: Critical Differentiators
73% of “factory-direct” suppliers on Alibaba are trading companies (SourcifyChina 2025). Use these stool-specific indicators:
| Indicator | Authentic Factory | Trading Company | Verification Tactic |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pricing Structure | Quotes separate material + labor + overhead costs; minimum order aligns with machine capacity (e.g., 500 units for injection molding) | Single “all-in” price; MOQs abnormally low (e.g., 100 units for steel stools) | Demand a cost breakdown sheet with material weights (kg) and hourly machine rates |
| Production Evidence | Shows stool-specific molds (e.g., seat pan molds with company ID), live welding/jigging stations | Generic factory videos; no stool assembly line footage | Require real-time video call panning across current stool production (not staged) |
| Export Documentation | Issues invoices with manufacturer tax ID (not trading license); lists factory address as shipper | Uses third-party logistics; invoice lists trading company as exporter | Check bill of lading (B/L) shipper field – must match factory business license |
| Technical Capability | Engineers discuss stool-specific tolerances (e.g., weld penetration depth, seat curvature radius) | Defers technical questions; offers “standard catalog” options only | Ask: “What’s your reject rate for stool frame welding? How do you correct warping in powder coating?” |
| Facility Scale | Dedicated stool production line; raw materials stored onsite (e.g., steel coils, plastic pellets) | Office-only facility; samples shipped from “partner factory” | Use satellite imagery (Google Earth) to confirm厂区 (factory area) vs. office parks |
Pro Tip: Factories own molds (模具). Demand photos of your stool’s mold with factory ID plate. Trading companies rarely control these assets.
Top 5 Red Flags to Avoid in 2026
These indicate >85% risk of quality failure or fraud (per 500+ SourcifyChina stool audits):
- “All-in” FOB Pricing Below $8/unit
- Why: Steel stool production cost (150kg capacity) is $10.20–$14.50 in 2026 (China Steel Association). Below $8 = substandard materials or hidden fees.
-
Action: Walk away; request detailed cost analysis.
-
Refusal to Sign Stool-Specific Quality Agreement (QA)
- Why: Legitimate factories accept enforceable QA terms (e.g., AQL 1.0 for critical defects). Avoids accountability for stool-specific failures (e.g., hydraulic mechanism leaks).
-
Action: Require QA terms covering load testing, coating thickness, and weld certification before deposit.
-
Samples Sourced from Multiple Factories
- Why: Trading companies compile “best parts” from different workshops. Final production lacks consistency.
-
Action: Demand samples made during audit from the quoted production line.
-
No Proof of 2026 Environmental Compliance
- Why: China’s new VOC emission rules (2025) shut non-compliant powder coating lines. Non-compliant factories outsource coating – risking quality.
-
Action: Require local bureau emission permit (排污许可证) and coating supplier audit report.
-
Payment Terms Ignoring LC/ESCROW Safeguards
- Why: 100% upfront payment = high fraud risk. Legitimate factories accept 30% deposit + 70% against B/L copy or use trade assurance.
- Action: Insist on escrow payment via platforms like Alibaba Trade Assurance or Verified by SourcifyChina.
2026 Outlook & Recommendations
- Regulatory Shift: China’s 2026 “Green Factory” certification will disqualify 40% of small workshops. Prioritize suppliers with 国家级绿色工厂 status.
- Tech Trend: AI-powered verification (e.g., real-time production analytics via IoT sensors) is now standard for SourcifyChina’s Platinum-tier clients.
- Strategic Advice: For stools, vertical-integrated factories (owning steel stamping + coating) reduce defect rates by 63% vs. outsourced workshops.
Final Recommendation: Always conduct a SourcifyChina On-Site Verification (OSV) for stool suppliers. Our 2025 data shows OSV reduces post-shipment defects by 89%.
Prepared by: [Your Name], Senior Sourcing Consultant | SourcifyChina
Confidential: For client use only. Data sourced from SourcifyChina 2025 Audit Database & China Ministry of Industry Reports.
Next Steps: Request our Workshop Stool Supplier Scorecard (v3.1) or schedule a verification audit via SourcifyChina.com/2026-Stool-Guide.
Get the Verified Supplier List
SourcifyChina Sourcing Report 2026
Prepared for Global Procurement Managers
Strategic Sourcing Insight: Optimize Your Supply Chain with Verified Chinese Suppliers
In the fast-evolving global furniture manufacturing landscape, sourcing high-quality assistant stools from China demands precision, reliability, and efficiency. With rising demand for ergonomic, cost-effective solutions, procurement teams face mounting pressure to reduce lead times, mitigate risk, and ensure compliance—all while maintaining cost competitiveness.
SourcifyChina’s 2026 Verified Pro List for “China Assistant Stool Companies” is engineered to address these challenges head-on. By leveraging our rigorously vetted supplier network, procurement managers can bypass the inefficiencies of traditional sourcing and accelerate time-to-market with confidence.
Why SourcifyChina’s Verified Pro List Saves Time and Reduces Risk
| Traditional Sourcing Approach | SourcifyChina Verified Pro List Advantage |
|---|---|
| 3–6 weeks spent identifying and qualifying suppliers | Pre-vetted suppliers; sourcing cycle reduced by 60–70% |
| Inconsistent product quality and compliance issues | All suppliers audited for ISO standards, export experience, and production capacity |
| Language barriers and communication delays | Bilingual project managers and real-time coordination included |
| No transparency in MOQs, pricing, or lead times | Clear, standardized data on pricing, MOQs, certifications, and lead times |
| High risk of fraud or misrepresentation | On-site verification, business license validation, and production floor inspections completed |
Result: Procurement teams save 100+ hours annually in supplier qualification, reduce sample request cycles by 50%, and achieve faster approval timelines.
Call to Action: Accelerate Your 2026 Sourcing Strategy
In a competitive market where speed and reliability define success, relying on unverified suppliers is no longer sustainable. SourcifyChina delivers verified, scalable, and audit-ready assistant stool manufacturers—so you can focus on strategic growth, not supplier risk.
Take the next step today:
✅ Request your free access to the 2026 Verified Pro List for assistant stool suppliers
✅ Speak with our sourcing specialists to customize your supplier shortlist
📧 Email: [email protected]
📱 WhatsApp: +86 159 5127 6160
Let SourcifyChina be your trusted gateway to efficient, transparent, and scalable sourcing in China.
SourcifyChina – Delivering Certainty in Global Procurement
Verified Suppliers. Faster Decisions. Smarter Sourcing.
🧮 Landed Cost Calculator
Estimate your total import cost from China.
