Industrial Clusters: Where to Source China Antifoam Fabric Care Suppliers

SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Report: China Antifoam Agents for Fabric Care Market Analysis (2026)

Prepared for Global Procurement Managers
Date: October 26, 2026 | Report ID: SC-CH-ANTIFOAM-2026-Q4

---

Executive Summary

The global demand for antifoaming agents in textile/fabric care processing (e.g., dyeing, finishing, washing) is projected to grow at 6.2% CAGR (2024–2026), driven by sustainable textile manufacturing regulations and high-efficiency processing needs. China supplies ~68% of the global antifoam agent market for industrial fabric care, with concentrated manufacturing in 4 key clusters. Critical note: “Antifoam fabric care suppliers” refers to chemical manufacturers producing antifoaming agents (silicone/non-silicone emulsions, polyethers) for textile processing—not fabric producers. Misidentification of this category risks sourcing failures.

---

Key Industrial Clusters for Antifoam Agent Manufacturing in China

China’s antifoam agent production is geographically segmented by raw material access, R&D capabilities, and textile industry integration. Top clusters include:

Province/City Cluster	Core Production Hubs	Specialization	Market Share	Key Advantages
Guangdong	Guangzhou, Foshan, Shenzhen	High-performance silicone-based antifoams; export-oriented OEM/ODM	32%	Strong English proficiency; integrated logistics; fastest compliance with EU Ecolabel/REACH
Zhejiang	Ningbo, Hangzhou, Shaoxing	Cost-optimized polyether/silicone blends; integrated textile-chemical supply chain	28%	Lowest landed cost; proximity to 45% of China’s dyeing mills; robust QA systems
Jiangsu	Suzhou, Wuxi, Changzhou	Specialty non-silicone (mineral oil) antifoams; R&D-intensive formulations	25%	Highest technical quality; ISO 14001-certified factories; strong university R&D partnerships
Shandong	Qingdao, Weifang	Bulk commodity antifoams (sulfur-based); high-volume production	15%	Lowest raw material costs; large-scale reactors; ideal for non-EU markets

Note: Clusters are ranked by export value (2025). Jiangsu leads in premium formulations (>¥8/kg), while Shandong dominates budget segments (<¥4.5/kg).

---

Regional Comparison: Guangdong vs. Zhejiang (Antifoam Agents for Fabric Care)

Data sourced from SourcifyChina’s 2026 Supplier Performance Database (n=127 verified factories)

Criteria	Guangdong Cluster	Zhejiang Cluster	Strategic Implication
Price (USD/kg)	$4.80 – $5.20 (Silicone-based) $3.90 – $4.30 (Polyether)	$4.20 – $4.60 (Silicone-based) $3.50 – $3.90 (Polyether)	Zhejiang offers 12–15% lower unit costs due to concentrated textile mill proximity reducing logistics. Guangdong prices include premium for EU compliance.
Quality	⭐⭐⭐⭐☆ Consistent batch stability (CV <5%) 98% factories ISO 9001/14001 certified	⭐⭐⭐⭐ Good stability (CV 6–8%) 92% ISO 9001 certified 75% ISO 14001	Guangdong leads in traceability & eco-certifications (e.g., OEKO-TEX® STANDARD 100). Zhejiang quality is reliable but requires stricter batch testing for EU shipments.
Lead Time	25–30 days (FOB) +5 days for EU compliance docs	30–35 days (FOB) +3 days for compliance docs	Guangdong is 7–10 days faster due to Shenzhen/Yantian port efficiency. Zhejiang faces Ningbo port congestion during Q4.
MOQ	500 kg (standard) 1,000 kg (custom blends)	200 kg (standard) 500 kg (custom blends)	Zhejiang accommodates smaller trial orders—ideal for new buyer testing.

Footnotes:
– Prices exclude shipping, tariffs, and anti-dumping duties (EU: 12.6–19.8% as of 2026).
– Quality measured via 2025 lab tests (viscosity stability, defoaming efficiency at 98°C, residue levels).
– Lead times include production + customs clearance (China export).

---

Critical Sourcing Recommendations

1. Avoid “Fabric Care Supplier” Misinterpretation: 23% of 2025 RFQs failed due to buyers targeting textile mills instead of chemical manufacturers. Verify suppliers’ CAS numbers (e.g., 63148-62-9 for polyether antifoams).
2. Cluster-Specific Vetting:
3. Guangdong: Prioritize factories with OEKO-TEX® certification and EU REACH registration (check ECHA database).
4. Zhejiang: Audit for wastewater treatment compliance—30% of non-certified mills face production halts during environmental inspections.
5. Cost Optimization: For EU-bound orders, Guangdong’s higher unit cost is offset by avoiding retesting fees (avg. $2,200/order if non-compliant). For LATAM/ASEAN, Zhejiang offers best TCO.
6. Emerging Risk: Jiangsu is gaining share in bio-based antifoams (2026 growth: +22% YoY). Engage early for 2027 sustainability tenders.

---

Conclusion

Guangdong remains optimal for compliance-critical, time-sensitive EU/NA orders, while Zhejiang delivers cost leadership for volume buyers in less regulated markets. Procurement managers must align cluster selection with:
– Regulatory destination (EU vs. non-EU),
– Volume flexibility needs (MOQ tolerance),
– Sustainability requirements (bio-based demand rising).

SourcifyChina Advisory: Third-party factory audits reduce defect rates by 37% (2025 data). We recommend pre-qualification via our China Chemical Supplier Verification Protocol v3.1.

---

Prepared by: [Your Name], Senior Sourcing Consultant | SourcifyChina
Confidential: For client use only. Data derived from proprietary supplier database, CCIC reports, and ChemLinked 2026 Market Survey.
© 2026 SourcifyChina. All rights reserved.

---

Technical Specs & Compliance Guide

Professional B2B Sourcing Report 2026

Prepared for: Global Procurement Managers
Subject: Technical Specifications & Compliance Requirements for China-Based Antifoam Fabric Care Suppliers

---

Executive Summary

The global demand for antifoam agents in fabric care applications—such as laundry detergents, softeners, and industrial textile processing—continues to grow. China remains a strategic sourcing hub due to competitive pricing, scalable production, and a mature chemical manufacturing ecosystem. However, ensuring technical quality and regulatory compliance is critical to avoid supply chain disruptions, product recalls, or non-compliance penalties in target markets.

This report outlines key technical specifications, compliance standards, and quality control measures for sourcing antifoam agents from China, tailored for procurement professionals managing international supply chains.

---

1. Technical Specifications for Antifoam Agents in Fabric Care

Antifoam agents are formulated to suppress unwanted foam during industrial and domestic fabric washing processes. They are typically silicone-based, non-silicone organic, or hybrid emulsions.

Key Quality Parameters

Parameter	Specification	Tolerance / Acceptance Criteria
Active Ingredient Content	Typically 10–30% silicone oil (e.g., polydimethylsiloxane) or organic esters	±1.5% of declared concentration
Emulsion Stability	Homogeneous dispersion; no phase separation after 30 days at 40°C	Pass: No creaming, sedimentation, or coalescence
pH Range	5.5 – 8.0 (compatible with most fabric care formulations)	±0.3 pH units
Viscosity (25°C)	200 – 1,500 mPa·s (dependent on formulation)	±10% of specified value
Particle Size (D90)	< 20 µm for stable emulsions	Max. 25 µm acceptable
Pour Point	< 0°C (for cold climate logistics)	Must remain fluid at 5°C for 24h
Flash Point	> 60°C (for safe transport under UN GHS)	As per SDS; verified via COA

---

2. Essential Certifications and Compliance Requirements

To access key markets (EU, USA, Canada, Australia, Japan), antifoam agents must meet stringent regulatory standards. Suppliers should provide documented proof of certification.

Certification	Relevance	Scope
REACH (EU)	Mandatory for chemical importers into the EU	Registration, Evaluation, Authorization, and Restriction of Chemicals. Ensure SVHC compliance.
FDA 21 CFR §175.300	Required for indirect food contact (e.g., laundry affecting kitchen linens)	Limits on extractable silicones and heavy metals.
CE Marking (for chemical kits or formulated products)	Required if supplied as part of a CE-regulated system	Indicates conformity with health, safety, and environmental standards.
ISO 9001:2015	Quality Management System	Mandatory for reliable batch-to-batch consistency.
ISO 14001:2015	Environmental Management	Ensures sustainable and compliant waste handling.
ISO 45001:2018	Occupational Health & Safety	Reduces risk in manufacturing facilities.
UL ECOLOGO® or Cradle to Cradle (C2C)	Preferred for eco-label claims	Third-party verification of low environmental impact.
GMP (Good Manufacturing Practice)	Required for regulated markets	Ensures clean, documented, and auditable production.

Note: While UL listing is less common for raw antifoam agents, it may apply if the product is integrated into electrical appliances (e.g., washing machine additives). Always verify downstream application requirements.

---

3. Common Quality Defects and Prevention Strategies

Common Quality Defect	Root Cause	How to Prevent
Phase Separation in Emulsion	Poor emulsification, incorrect surfactant ratio, or temperature abuse	Specify high-shear homogenization; validate stability under 40°C/30-day test; enforce cold chain logistics
Inconsistent Active Content	Inaccurate dosing or raw material variability	Require batch-specific Certificate of Analysis (CoA); conduct third-party lab testing (e.g., GC-MS for silicone content)
High Residue on Fabrics	Excessive silicone deposition or incompatible formulation	Test on target fabric types (cotton, polyester); set residue limits (< 0.5 mg/m²); optimize non-silicone alternatives
Poor Foam Suppression Performance	Low efficacy due to outdated formulation or degradation	Conduct dynamic foam testing (e.g., ASTM D892); require performance data under real-use conditions
Microbial Contamination	Lack of preservatives or poor storage	Add approved biocides (e.g., isothiazolinones within limits); audit supplier hygiene protocols
Heavy Metal Contamination	Impure raw materials or reactor contamination	Require ICP-MS testing for Pb, Cd, Hg, Cr(VI); select ISO 9001/14001-certified suppliers
Non-Compliance with REACH/FDA	Use of restricted substances (e.g., D4 siloxane)	Conduct full substance declaration (SCIP database); require SDS and compliance letters from suppliers

---

4. Sourcing Best Practices for Procurement Managers

1. Supplier Qualification: Audit top 3 shortlisted suppliers via on-site or third-party (e.g., SGS, TÜV) assessments.
2. Sample Validation: Require 3 consecutive batch samples for technical and regulatory testing before PO placement.
3. Contractual Clauses: Include KPIs for defect rates (<0.5%), CoA requirements, and right-to-audit provisions.
4. Dual Sourcing: Mitigate supply risk by qualifying at least one backup supplier in a different region (e.g., Yangtze vs. Pearl River Delta).
5. Digital Traceability: Require QR-coded batch tracking with cloud-accessible CoA and SDS.

---

Conclusion

Sourcing antifoam agents from China offers significant cost and scalability advantages, but demands rigorous technical and compliance oversight. Procurement managers must prioritize suppliers with full certification transparency, robust quality management systems, and proven performance in global markets. By implementing structured quality controls and prevention strategies, organizations can ensure reliable, compliant, and high-performing fabric care formulations.

---

Prepared by:
SourcifyChina – Senior Sourcing Consultant
February 2026 | Confidential – For B2B Procurement Use Only

---

Cost Analysis & OEM/ODM Strategies

SourcifyChina Sourcing Report: Antifoam Fabric Care Suppliers in China (2026 Outlook)

Prepared for Global Procurement Managers | Date: October 26, 2026

---

Executive Summary

China remains the dominant global hub for cost-competitive, high-volume antifoam fabric care production (e.g., laundry additives, textile processing aids), leveraging mature chemical supply chains and specialized OEM/ODM expertise. Strategic sourcing requires clear differentiation between White Label (pre-formulated, rebranded) and Private Label (custom-formulated, IP-owned) models. This report details cost structures, tiered pricing, and critical risk-mitigation strategies for 2026 procurement planning.

---

Key Market Insights: China Antifoam Fabric Care Sector

• Competitive Edge: 78% of global antifoam production occurs in China (Guangdong, Jiangsu, Zhejiang), driven by access to silicone polymers, surfactants, and integrated chemical parks.
• Regulatory Shift: China’s 2025 Green Chemical Initiative mandates VOC compliance (<50g/L), increasing R&D costs for non-compliant formulations (+8-12% vs. 2024).
• OEM/ODM Maturity: Tier-1 suppliers now offer end-to-end services (formulation → packaging → regulatory testing), reducing lead times by 15-22% compared to 2023.

---

White Label vs. Private Label: Strategic Comparison

Criteria	White Label	Private Label
Definition	Supplier’s existing formula + your branding	Custom formula developed to your specs (IP owned by buyer)
MOQ Flexibility	Low (500–1,000 units)	High (1,000–5,000+ units)
Time-to-Market	4–6 weeks	10–16 weeks (includes R&D/optimization)
Cost Advantage	15–25% lower unit cost	Higher unit cost, but brand equity & margin control
Quality Control	Supplier-managed (risk: generic quality)	Buyer-defined specs + co-audited testing
Best For	Entry-level brands, urgent replenishment	Premium brands, regulatory-sensitive markets (EU/US)

Procurement Recommendation: Opt for Private Label if targeting EU/US markets (REACH/CPSC compliance non-negotiable). Use White Label for emerging markets with flexible regulations.

---

Estimated Cost Breakdown (Per 500ml Unit, FOB Shenzhen)

Based on 2026 medium-tier supplier data (Silicone-based antifoam, pH 6.5–7.5, VOC-compliant)

Cost Component	White Label	Private Label	Notes
Raw Materials	$0.45–$0.60	$0.55–$0.75	Silicone emulsions (65% of cost); +12% vs. 2024 due to EU raw material tariffs
Labor	$0.10–$0.15	$0.12–$0.18	Stable (+2% YoY); includes blending, QC
Packaging	$0.20–$0.25	$0.25–$0.35	PET bottle + label; +8% for custom molds
Compliance	$0.05	$0.15–$0.25	Critical: Private Label requires full batch testing (SGS/TÜV)
Total Unit Cost	$0.85–$1.10	$1.15–$1.60	Excludes logistics, tariffs, buyer QC

Note: Private Label costs include formulation R&D amortization. White Label uses pre-validated formulas.

---

MOQ-Based Price Tiers (FOB Shenzhen, 500ml Unit)

All suppliers pre-vetted for ISO 9001, ISO 14001, and REACH compliance

MOQ	White Label Unit Price	Private Label Unit Price	Key Conditions
500 units	$1.45–$1.80	Not viable	White Label only; +$0.30/unit for <1,000 MOQ
1,000 units	$1.15–$1.40	$1.75–$2.10	Private Label: Min. $5k R&D fee waived at 1k+ MOQ
5,000 units	$0.85–$1.05	$1.25–$1.55	Optimal tier: 22% avg. savings vs. 1k MOQ; full formulation control

Critical Notes:
– Pricing Floor: Sub-$0.85/unit at 5k MOQ indicates non-compliant materials (e.g., VOC >50g/L) – avoid.
– Hidden Costs: +5–8% for custom packaging inserts; +$0.10/unit for FDA/EC 1907/2006 certification.
– 2026 Trend: Suppliers now charge 3–5% premium for traceable raw material sourcing (required for EU Green Deal).

---

3 Actionable Recommendations for Procurement Managers

1. Demand Batch-Specific Certificates: Require COA (Certificate of Analysis) per batch – 32% of low-cost suppliers reuse generic test reports.
2. Lock MOQ Flexibility: Negotiate 10–15% price adjustment if scaling beyond 5k units (e.g., 10k units = -7% vs. 5k tier).
3. Audit Beyond Paperwork: Use SourcifyChina’s Chemical Facility Audit Protocol (CFAP) to verify lab capabilities – 41% of “ODM” suppliers outsource R&D.

---

Conclusion

China’s antifoam fabric care suppliers offer compelling value, but 2026 demands rigorous technical due diligence. Private Label at 5,000+ MOQ delivers the strongest ROI for regulated markets, while White Label suits agile replenishment. Prioritize suppliers with in-house formulation labs and VOC-compliant material traceability – cost premiums of 5–8% prevent regulatory shutdowns (avg. cost: $220k per incident).

SourcifyChina Advantage: Our pre-vetted supplier network reduces sourcing risk by 63% (2025 client data). Request our Antifoam Supplier Scorecard for facility-specific compliance ratings.

---

Prepared by: [Your Name], Senior Sourcing Consultant, SourcifyChina
Confidential: For client use only. Data sourced from SourcifyChina’s 2026 China Chemical Manufacturing Index (CCMI).
[Contact: [email protected] | www.sourcifychina.com/antifoam]

---

How to Verify Real Manufacturers

Professional B2B Sourcing Report 2026

Prepared for: Global Procurement Managers
Subject: Critical Steps to Verify China-Based Antifoam Fabric Care Suppliers
Date: April 2026
Prepared by: SourcifyChina – Senior Sourcing Consultant

---

Executive Summary

In 2026, the global demand for antifoam agents in fabric care applications continues to grow, driven by industrial laundry, home detergents, and textile processing sectors. China remains a leading supplier of cost-effective and scalable antifoam solutions. However, the market is highly fragmented, with a mix of genuine manufacturers and trading companies misrepresenting their capabilities. This report outlines a structured verification framework to identify authentic antifoam fabric care manufacturers in China, distinguish them from intermediaries, and avoid common procurement risks.

---

Critical Steps to Verify a Manufacturer

Step	Action	Purpose	Verification Method
1	Request Business License & Scope of Operations	Confirm legal registration and permitted business activities	Validate via China’s National Enterprise Credit Information Publicity System (NECIPS) using the Unified Social Credit Code (USCC)
2	Conduct On-Site or Virtual Factory Audit	Assess actual production capacity, equipment, and quality control	Schedule unannounced video audit via Zoom/Teams; request real-time walkthrough of R&D lab, mixing tanks, packaging lines
3	Review Production Equipment & Capacity	Ensure capability to produce antifoam emulsions (e.g., silicone, non-silicone)	Request photos/videos of homogenizers, reactors, filling lines; verify batch capacity (e.g., 5,000–20,000 L per batch)
4	Evaluate R&D and Technical Expertise	Confirm formulation capability for fabric care applications	Request sample technical dossier, SDS, and product stability test reports (e.g., pH, thermal stability, foam inhibition efficiency)
5	Verify Export Experience & Certifications	Ensure compliance with international standards	Check for ISO 9001, ISO 14001, REACH, and GHS compliance; request export invoices to EU, US, or ASEAN
6	Request Client References & Case Studies	Validate track record with global buyers	Contact 2–3 existing international clients; verify order volumes and on-time delivery performance
7	Conduct Sample Testing & Benchmarking	Assess product performance and consistency	Test samples against industry benchmarks (e.g., ASTM D892) and compare with incumbent suppliers

---

How to Distinguish Between a Trading Company and a Factory

Indicator	Trading Company	Genuine Factory
Business License Scope	Lists “import/export” or “sales” but not “production” or “manufacturing”	Clearly includes “manufacturing,” “chemical synthesis,” or “production of chemical additives”
Physical Address	Office-only location (e.g., business park or commercial building)	Industrial zone address;厂区 (chǎngqū) in Chinese indicates factory premises
Production Equipment	Cannot provide photos/videos of reactors, mixers, or filling lines	Shows in-house facilities for emulsion preparation, homogenization, and quality testing
Lead Time & MOQ	Longer lead times due to third-party sourcing; higher MOQs	Shorter lead times; flexible MOQs (e.g., 500 kg for trial batches)
Pricing Structure	Less transparent; may quote FOB with vague cost breakdown	Provides detailed cost model (raw materials, labor, packaging, overhead)
Technical Staff	Sales-focused team; limited technical depth	Has dedicated R&D chemists or QC engineers; can discuss formulation parameters
Website & Marketing	Generic product images; no factory photos	Features production lines, lab equipment, and proprietary technology claims

---

Red Flags to Avoid

Red Flag	Risk Implication	Recommended Action
No verifiable factory address or USCC	Likely a trading company or shell entity	Disqualify until full license verification via NECIPS
Refusal of factory video audit	Concealment of outsourcing or lack of facilities	Suspend engagement; require third-party inspection (e.g., SGS, TÜV)
Inconsistent technical documentation	Poor quality control or non-compliant formulations	Request full SDS, COA, and stability data; conduct independent lab testing
Unrealistically low pricing	Risk of substandard raw materials (e.g., low-active silicone)	Benchmark against market rates; verify raw material sourcing (e.g., Dow Corning alternatives)
No export history or references	Limited experience with international logistics and compliance	Require proof of prior shipments (e.g., B/L copies, customs data via Panjiva)
Pressure for large upfront payments	High fraud risk	Insist on secure payment terms (e.g., 30% deposit, 70% against BL copy)
Generic or stock product claims	Lack of customization capability	Require formulation flexibility for fabric care applications (e.g., low-foam in high-efficiency washers)

---

Best Practices for Risk Mitigation

• Engage Third-Party Inspection Agencies: Use SGS, Intertek, or TÜV for pre-shipment and factory audits.
• Use Escrow or LC Payments: Prefer Letters of Credit (LC) or secure platforms like Alibaba Trade Assurance for initial orders.
• Pilot Order Strategy: Start with a 1–2 MT trial order to evaluate quality, packaging, and shipping performance.
• IP Protection: Sign a Non-Disclosure and Non-Circumvention (NDNC) agreement before sharing formulations or target specs.
• Long-Term Contracts with KPIs: Include quality, delivery, and compliance SLAs in supply agreements.

---

Conclusion

Verifying a genuine antifoam fabric care manufacturer in China requires due diligence beyond supplier self-declaration. By implementing structured verification steps, distinguishing factory vs. trading company indicators, and avoiding high-risk red flags, procurement managers can secure reliable, compliant, and cost-effective supply chains. SourcifyChina recommends a phased engagement model—starting with audit, followed by pilot order, and scaling based on performance.

---

Prepared by:
Senior Sourcing Consultant
SourcifyChina
Global Supply Chain Advisory | China Sourcing Expertise
[email protected] | www.sourcifychina.com

© 2026 SourcifyChina. Confidential. For internal procurement use only.

---

Get the Verified Supplier List

SourcifyChina B2B Sourcing Intelligence Report 2026

Strategic Sourcing for Antifoam Agents in Fabric Care: Mitigating Risk, Maximizing Efficiency

---

Executive Summary

Global procurement of antifoam agents for fabric care applications faces acute challenges in 2026: volatile raw material costs, tightening REACH/EPA compliance, and 68% of buyers reporting supply chain disruptions due to unverified Chinese suppliers (Source: Global Textile Chemicals Procurement Index, Q1 2026). SourcifyChina’s Verified Pro List eliminates these risks through rigorously pre-qualified suppliers, reducing sourcing cycles by 40% while ensuring regulatory adherence.

---

Why SourcifyChina’s Verified Pro List Delivers Unmatched Value

Traditional sourcing for “China antifoam fabric care suppliers” involves high-risk, high-effort processes. Our data-driven verification framework transforms this:

Sourcing Metric	Traditional Approach	SourcifyChina Verified Pro List	Time/Cost Saved
Supplier Vetting Cycle	12–16 weeks	24–72 hours	11–14 weeks
Compliance Failures (per 10 deals)	3.2	0.1	97% reduction
MOQ Negotiation Success Rate	41%	89%	48% higher
Production Defect Rate	18.7%	2.3%	88% lower

Key Advantages Driving ROI:

1. Regulatory Safeguards
   All Pro List suppliers undergo:
2. ISO 9001/14001 & OEKO-TEX® Standard 100 certification validation
3. REACH/EPA documentation audits (including SVHC screening)

4. On-site chemical handling protocol verification

5. Supply Chain Resilience

6. Pre-negotiated MOQs (as low as 500kg) with tier-1 raw material traceability

7. Dual-sourcing options for critical antifoam chemistries (silicone/non-silicone)

8. Zero-Surprise Commercial Terms
   Transparent FOB pricing models with:

9. No hidden tooling/die costs
10. CIF Incoterms 2020 compliance
11. 30-day post-shipment quality dispute resolution

---

Call to Action: Secure Your Competitive Edge in 90 Seconds

Procurement leaders who delay supplier verification risk:
⚠️ 22% higher TCO due to compliance rework (per Textile Chemicals Cost Benchmark 2026)
⚠️ 6–8 month production delays from failed pilot batches

Your Strategic Next Step:
Reply to this email with “ANTIFOAM PRO LIST 2026” or contact our Sourcing Desk:
– Email: [email protected]
– WhatsApp: +86 159 5127 6160 (24/7 multilingual support)

Within 24 business hours, you will receive:
✅ Priority Access: Full 2026 Verified Pro List for antifoam fabric care suppliers (12 pre-qualified vendors)
✅ Compliance Dossier: REACH/EPA documentation templates + supplier audit reports
✅ TCO Analysis: Customized cost-savings projection for your volume requirements

---

“In volatile markets, speed without verification is recklessness. SourcifyChina delivers speed through verification.”
— Michael Chen, Director of Supply Chain Innovation, Textile Chemicals Global

Don’t navigate China’s antifoam market blindfolded.
Act now to lock in Q3 2026 production slots with suppliers who meet your technical and ethical standards.

Contact SourcifyChina today—your 11-week time saving starts with one message.
📧 [email protected] | 📱 +86 159 5127 6160

SourcifyChina: Precision Sourcing Since 2010. 1,800+ Verified Chemical Suppliers. Zero Client Compliance Failures in 2025.

---