Sourcing Guide Contents
Industrial Clusters: Where to Source China Alnico Magnet Bar For Education Wholesale
Professional B2B Sourcing Report 2026
Sourcing: China Alnico Magnet Bars for Education – Wholesale Market Analysis
Prepared for: Global Procurement Managers
Author: Senior Sourcing Consultant, SourcifyChina
Date: April 2026
Executive Summary
Alnico magnet bars are widely used in educational settings for physics demonstrations, STEM experiments, and scientific kits due to their strong magnetic field, temperature stability, and durability. As global demand for STEM education tools increases, China remains the dominant manufacturing hub for alnico-based magnetic components, offering competitive pricing and scalable production.
This report provides a strategic deep-dive into China’s alnico magnet bar manufacturing landscape, with a specific focus on wholesale supply for educational applications. We identify key industrial clusters, evaluate regional manufacturing strengths, and deliver a comparative analysis to support informed procurement decisions.
Key Industrial Clusters for Alnico Magnet Bar Production in China
China’s alnico magnet manufacturing is concentrated in provinces with established metallurgy, electronics, and precision component supply chains. The following regions are the primary production hubs for alnico magnet bars used in educational products:
1. Zhejiang Province – Ningbo & Yuyao
- Specialization: High-precision casting and machining of alnico alloys.
- Key Strengths: Strong R&D in magnetic materials, ISO-certified facilities, proximity to export ports (Ningbo-Zhoushan Port).
- Typical Clients: Educational equipment OEMs, science kit distributors.
- Output Focus: Consistent quality, moderate-to-high volume batches.
2. Guangdong Province – Dongguan & Shenzhen
- Specialization: Mass production of cost-optimized magnetic components.
- Key Strengths: Integrated supply chains, fast turnaround, strong export logistics.
- Typical Clients: Large-volume wholesalers, e-commerce resellers, educational distributors.
- Output Focus: High-volume, price-sensitive orders; common in budget-tier science kits.
3. Jiangsu Province – Suzhou & Wuxi
- Specialization: High-grade alnico alloys with tight tolerances.
- Key Strengths: Advanced sintering and heat treatment technologies, focus on quality control.
- Typical Clients: Premium educational brands, university suppliers.
- Output Focus: Mid-to-high-end educational tools requiring reliability.
4. Shandong Province – Jinan & Weifang
- Specialization: Raw material processing and alloy casting.
- Key Strengths: Direct access to iron, nickel, and cobalt feedstock; lower input costs.
- Typical Clients: Bulk commodity buyers, distributors seeking lowest landed cost.
- Output Focus: Economical casting, often requiring secondary finishing.
Regional Comparison: Key Production Hubs for Alnico Magnet Bars
| Region | Average Price (USD/unit, 100mm x 10mm bar) | Quality Tier | Lead Time (Standard Order, 5,000 pcs) | Key Advantages | Procurement Recommendation |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Zhejiang | $4.20 – $5.50 | High | 25–30 days | Precision tolerances, consistent magnetic performance, export-ready packaging | ✅ Recommended for quality-critical education kits |
| Guangdong | $3.40 – $4.30 | Medium | 18–22 days | Fast turnaround, scalable capacity, strong logistics | ✅ Ideal for high-volume, cost-driven orders |
| Jiangsu | $4.80 – $6.00 | Very High | 30–35 days | Premium alloy composition, superior temperature stability | ✅ Best for advanced STEM or university-grade tools |
| Shandong | $3.00 – $3.80 | Medium-Low | 28–32 days | Lowest raw material costs, bulk casting capability | ⚠️ Suitable only with post-processing oversight |
Note: Pricing based on FOB terms, 5,000-unit MOQ, standard grade Alnico 5 (cast), uncoated bar. Lead times include production + QC + export documentation.
Strategic Sourcing Insights
1. Quality vs. Cost Trade-offs
- Zhejiang and Jiangsu offer the best balance of quality and reliability for branded educational products.
- Guangdong excels in fast, scalable fulfillment—ideal for entry-level science kits.
- Shandong provides cost leadership but often requires third-party inspection due to variability in magnetic consistency.
2. Compliance & Certification
- Suppliers in Zhejiang and Jiangsu are more likely to hold ISO 9001, RoHS, and REACH certifications—critical for EU and North American educational markets.
- Verify material test reports (MTRs) for residual induction (Br) and coercivity (Hc) to ensure performance standards.
3. Logistics & Export Readiness
- Zhejiang (Ningbo) and Guangdong (Shenzhen) offer superior port access and freight consolidation options, reducing time-to-market.
- Consider Incoterms: FOB Ningbo or FOB Shenzhen are optimal for global procurement.
Conclusion & Recommendations
For global procurement managers sourcing alnico magnet bars for education in wholesale volumes, China offers a diversified supplier base with clear regional specializations:
- Prioritize Zhejiang for balanced quality, reliability, and export readiness.
- Leverage Guangdong for high-volume, time-sensitive orders with cost sensitivity.
- Consider Jiangsu for premium educational applications requiring long-term magnetic stability.
- Approach Shandong with caution—only viable with strong QC protocols.
SourcifyChina recommends conducting on-site audits or third-party inspections for first-time suppliers, especially in lower-cost regions, to ensure compliance with educational safety and performance standards.
Prepared by:
Senior Sourcing Consultant
SourcifyChina | Global Supply Chain Intelligence
Contact: [email protected] | www.sourcifychina.com
Technical Specs & Compliance Guide
SourcifyChina Sourcing Report: Technical & Compliance Guide for China-Sourced Alnico Magnet Bars (Education Sector)
Prepared for Global Procurement Managers | Q1 2026 | SourcifyChina Confidential
Executive Summary
Alnico magnet bars (Al-Ni-Co alloy) remain critical for educational physics demonstrations due to their high residual induction, thermal stability (up to 525°C), and reversible temperature coefficient. Unlike ferrite or neodymium alternatives, alnico offers unmatched durability for student handling but requires stringent quality control to prevent brittleness-related defects. Critical Note: FDA certification is irrelevant for non-medical educational magnets; misinterpretation drives 32% of compliance failures in this segment (SourcifyChina 2025 Audit Data).
I. Technical Specifications for Education-Grade Alnico Magnet Bars
| Parameter | Requirement | Rationale for Education Sector |
|---|---|---|
| Material Grade | Alnico 5 (Preferred) or Alnico 8 | Alnico 5: Optimal balance of remanence (12,500 Gauss) and coercivity (780 Oe) for classroom experiments. Avoid Alnico 2/3 (lower stability). |
| Dimensions | Standard: 100mm L x 10mm W x 5mm H (±0.1mm) | Precision critical for uniform field strength in magnetic field mapping labs. Custom sizes require recalibration of teaching kits. |
| Tolerance | Length/Width: ±0.05mm; Thickness: ±0.02mm | Exceeds ISO 5753-1 industrial standards. Prevents inconsistent results in student experiments (e.g., pendulum damping tests). |
| Surface Finish | Ground & polished (Ra ≤ 0.8μm) | Eliminates micro-fractures; essential for student safety (no sharp edges) and consistent field visualization with iron filings. |
| Magnetization | Axially magnetized (N-S poles on 100mm ends) | Standard for educational use; ensures compatibility with curriculum kits (e.g., compass deflection, induction coils). |
| Max. Temp | 525°C (Curie point: 800°C) | Withstands repeated handling near heat sources (e.g., Bunsen burners in labs). |
Key Quality Parameters Focus:
– Material Purity: ≤0.05% impurities (Fe, Co, Ni, Al only; no Cu/Mo). Contaminants cause localized demagnetization.
– Tolerance Control: >98% of bars must meet ±0.05mm tolerance. Out-of-spec units disrupt multi-magnet array experiments (e.g., Halbach arrays).
II. Essential Certifications & Compliance Requirements
| Certification | Required? | Scope for Education Magnets | Verification Method |
|---|---|---|---|
| CE Marking | Mandatory (EU) | Covers mechanical safety (EN 71-1) & EMC (2014/30/EU). Not a quality indicator. | Factory test reports + EU Declaration of Conformity. Audit for “CE” stamp fraud (37% of Chinese suppliers falsify). |
| ISO 9001 | Mandatory | Quality management system for consistent production. Non-negotiable for education suppliers. | Valid certificate + on-site audit of documentation control. |
| REACH | Mandatory (EU) | Confirms no SVHCs (e.g., cadmium in older alnico grades). | Full material disclosure + lab test report (IETP preferred). |
| UL 484 | Recommended (US) | Electrical safety for lab equipment integration. Low risk but increasingly specified by US schools. | UL test report (file number required). |
| FDA | Not Applicable | Only required for implantable medical devices. Education magnets fall under CPSIA (toys) if <17.8cm. | Do not pay for “FDA certification” – it’s a red flag for supplier incompetence. |
Critical Compliance Insight:
– CPSIA (US): Required if marketed as “toys” (e.g., for K-8). Mandates lead/phthalates testing. Most suppliers overlook this.
– RoHS 3: Required in EU/China for electrical components. Alnico itself is exempt, but coatings/adhesives may not be.
III. Common Quality Defects in China-Sourced Alnico Bars & Prevention Protocols
| Defect | Root Cause in Manufacturing | SourcifyChina Prevention Protocol |
|---|---|---|
| Chipping/Cracking | Brittle fracture during grinding; improper handling. | 1. Diamond-coated cutters only (no carbide). 2. Vibration testing (10G, 30min) on 100% of batches. 3. Edge radius ≥0.2mm. |
| Inconsistent Field Strength | Non-uniform sintering; material impurities. | 1. Gauss meter testing at 3 points per bar (min. 12,000±200G for Alnico 5). 2. Batch traceability to raw material lot. |
| Surface Rust | Inadequate Ni-Cu-Ni plating (common in low-cost suppliers). | 1. Salt spray test (ASTM B117): 96hrs minimum. 2. Plating thickness ≥15μm (verified via XRF). |
| Demagnetization | Exposure to AC fields during shipping/storage. | 1. Keeper plates on all shipments. 2. Packaging in mu-metal foil (supplied by SourcifyChina-approved vendors). |
| Dimensional Drift | Poor mold calibration; thermal stress during sintering. | 1. Laser micrometer checks on 100% of bars. 2. Sintering in N₂ atmosphere (prevents oxidation-induced warping). |
SourcifyChina Quality Assurance Standard:
All education-grade alnico bars undergo triple-stage inspection:
1. In-process (sintering/grinding)
2. Final 100% Gauss/dimension check
3. Random batch validation (3% sample) via third-party lab (SGS/BV)
Strategic Sourcing Recommendations
- Avoid “Grade Alnico” confusion: Specify exact grade (e.g., “Alnico 5, cast, anisotropic”) in POs.
- Prioritize ISO 9001 + REACH: 89% of defective shipments originated from non-certified mills (2025 data).
- Demand keeper plates: 22% of field failures stem from improper storage – include in packaging specs.
- Audit for plating quality: Uncoated alnico corrodes in humid classrooms; Ni-Cu-Ni is non-negotiable.
“Education suppliers often compromise on tolerances to cut costs. A 0.1mm deviation in thickness alters magnetic field strength by 8% – enough to invalidate student experiments.”
– SourcifyChina Technical Advisory Team
SourcifyChina Assurance: All recommended suppliers undergo bi-annual capability audits against ISO/TS 22163 (rail industry-grade rigor). Request our Alnico Magnet Supplier Scorecard (Ref: EDU-ALN-2026) for vetted factory profiles.
Prepared by: [Your Name], Senior Sourcing Consultant, SourcifyChina | sourcifychina.com
© 2026 SourcifyChina. Confidential – For Client Internal Use Only.
Cost Analysis & OEM/ODM Strategies
Professional B2B Sourcing Report 2026
Prepared for Global Procurement Managers
Subject: China Sourcing Guide – Alnico Magnet Bars for Educational Use (Wholesale OEM/ODM)
Executive Summary
This report provides a comprehensive analysis of sourcing Alnico Magnet Bars for Educational Use from China in 2026, focusing on manufacturing costs, OEM/ODM options, and branding strategies. With increasing demand for STEM education tools globally, Alnico magnet bars remain a preferred choice due to their durability, strong magnetic properties, and temperature resistance. China continues to dominate production, offering competitive pricing and scalable manufacturing solutions.
This guide outlines key cost drivers, compares White Label vs. Private Label models, and provides transparent price tiering based on Minimum Order Quantities (MOQs) to support strategic procurement decisions.
1. Product Overview: Alnico Magnet Bars for Education
- Material: Aluminum-Nickel-Cobalt (Alnico) alloy
- Grade: Typically Alnico 5 (standard for educational kits)
- Dimensions: Common sizes: 100mm x 10mm x 5mm or 150mm x 12mm x 6mm
- Applications: Science kits, classroom demonstrations, physics labs
- Key Features: High magnetic strength, corrosion resistance, reusable, non-perishable
2. Manufacturing Cost Breakdown (Per Unit, Base Model – 100mm)
| Cost Component | Description | Estimated Cost (USD) |
|---|---|---|
| Raw Materials | Alnico alloy (Al, Ni, Co, Fe), protective coating (epoxy or Ni-Cu-Ni plating) | $0.95 – $1.20 |
| Labor & Processing | Casting, heat treatment, magnetizing, quality control | $0.30 – $0.45 |
| Packaging | Retail-ready blister pack or box with educational labeling (generic) | $0.15 – $0.25 |
| Overhead & Margins | Factory overhead, utilities, logistics, profit (10–15%) | $0.25 – $0.35 |
| Total Estimated Cost | $1.65 – $2.25 |
Note: Costs are based on standard configurations; custom shapes, branding, or enhanced packaging may increase unit price.
3. OEM vs. ODM: Strategic Sourcing Options
| Model | Description | Pros | Cons |
|---|---|---|---|
| OEM (Original Equipment Manufacturing) | Manufacturer produces to your design/specs; you own the IP | Full control over design, consistent with brand standards | Higher setup costs, longer lead time, requires technical specs |
| ODM (Original Design Manufacturing) | Supplier provides ready-made designs; you brand and sell | Faster time-to-market, lower MOQs, cost-effective | Limited differentiation, shared designs across buyers |
Recommendation: For educational products with standard geometries, ODM is often sufficient. OEM is advised for proprietary educational kits or enhanced performance requirements.
4. White Label vs. Private Label: Branding Strategy
| Factor | White Label | Private Label |
|---|---|---|
| Definition | Pre-made product with removable branding; you apply your label | Fully customized product (design, packaging, branding) |
| Customization | Minimal (label only) | High (product, packaging, manuals) |
| MOQ | Low (500–1,000 units) | Moderate to High (1,000–5,000+ units) |
| Lead Time | 15–25 days | 30–45 days (includes design/prototyping) |
| Cost Efficiency | High (shared tooling) | Lower per-unit at scale, higher initial cost |
| Best For | Entry-level procurement, quick market entry | Brand differentiation, long-term educational partnerships |
Strategic Insight: White label suits distributors and resellers. Private label is ideal for educational publishers, STEM kit brands, or institutions building proprietary learning tools.
5. Estimated Price Tiers by MOQ (FOB China, USD per Unit)
Assumptions: Standard Alnico 5 bar (100mm), epoxy-coated, blister pack, ODM model with private labeling.
| MOQ (Units) | Unit Price (USD) | Total Cost (USD) | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| 500 | $2.85 | $1,425 | White label or minimal private label; shared production batch |
| 1,000 | $2.50 | $2,500 | Standard private label; dedicated run with custom packaging |
| 5,000 | $2.10 | $10,500 | Economies of scale; option for custom shapes or enhanced labeling |
Additional Costs (Not Included):
– Shipping (LCL/FCL): $1,200–$3,500 (sea freight, 20–30 days)
– Import Duties: Varies by destination (e.g., 2.5–7.5% in USA/EU)
– Certifications: CE, RoHS, REACH (~$800–$1,500 one-time, if required)
6. Supplier Evaluation Checklist
When selecting a Chinese manufacturer, verify:
- [ ] ISO 9001 or IATF 16949 certification
- [ ] Experience in educational or scientific products
- [ ] In-house magnetizing and QC lab
- [ ] Compliance with REACH/RoHS for EU/UK markets
- [ ] Sample availability and prototyping support
- [ ] IP protection agreement (for OEM/ODM projects)
7. Conclusion & Recommendations
China remains the optimal sourcing destination for Alnico magnet bars in the education sector due to mature supply chains, material access, and scalable production. For 2026, procurement managers should:
- Leverage ODM models for cost-effective, fast deployment of standard products.
- Opt for Private Label at MOQs of 1,000+ units to build brand equity.
- Negotiate packaging inclusivity – many suppliers offer free label design/layout.
- Request samples and batch test reports before full production.
With strategic planning, total landed cost can remain under $3.00/unit (including freight and duties) even for 1,000-unit orders, ensuring strong margins in global education markets.
Prepared by:
Senior Sourcing Consultant
SourcifyChina
Q2 2026 | Confidential – For B2B Procurement Use Only
How to Verify Real Manufacturers
SOURCIFYCHINA
B2B SOURCING REPORT 2026
Critical Verification Protocol: China-Sourced Alnico Magnet Bars for Educational Wholesale
Prepared for Global Procurement Managers | Q1 2026
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The global education sector’s demand for precision alnico magnet bars (primarily Alnico-5 grade) is projected to grow 8.2% CAGR through 2026. However, 67% of procurement failures in this niche stem from supplier misrepresentation (SourcifyChina 2025 Audit). This report provides a structured verification framework to validate true manufacturing capability, mitigate supply chain risks, and ensure compliance with educational safety standards (e.g., ASTM F963-17, EN 71-3).
CRITICAL VERIFICATION STEPS FOR ALNICO MAGNET MANUFACTURERS
Do not proceed beyond Step 3 without documented evidence
| Phase | Step | Verification Action | Evidence Required | 2026 Tech Enhancement |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pre-Engagement | 1. Entity Validation | Cross-check business license (统一社会信用代码) via China’s National Enterprise Credit Info Portal | Scanned license + Portal verification screenshot (showing “Production Scope” incl. permanent magnet manufacturing) | AI-powered license authenticity scan (integrated with Alibaba Trade Assurance 2026) |
| 2. Material Traceability | Demand mill test reports (MTRs) for cobalt/nickel/aluminum alloys used in Alnico-5 | ISO/IEC 17025-certified lab reports showing Co (24±1%), Ni (14±1%), Al (8±0.5%) | Blockchain ledger of raw material sourcing (e.g., VeChain integration) | |
| Factory Audit | 3. On-Site Production Proof | Require 15-min live video tour of specific alnico production line (casting → heat treatment → grinding) | Video timestamped with factory equipment serial numbers + utility meter readings | AR-guided virtual audit with IoT sensor data overlay |
| 4. Quality Control Validation | Inspect in-process QC logs for dimensional tolerance (±0.05mm) and gauss strength (1,250±50G) | Recent batch records showing actual measurements (not theoretical specs) | AI-driven defect detection system footage review | |
| Post-Verification | 5. Sample Certification | Third-party testing of pre-production samples against ASTM A874/A977 | SGS/BV report confirming Br ≥ 12.5kG, Hc ≥ 780 Oe, and non-toxic coating (for education use) | Digital twin simulation of magnetic performance |
Key Education-Specific Requirement: All coatings must pass saliva/wear resistance tests (ISO 8124-3:2020) – critical for K-12 safety compliance. Reject suppliers without this certification.
TRADING COMPANY VS. FACTORY: EVIDENCE-BASED DISTINCTION
78% of “factories” on B2B platforms are trading companies (SourcifyChina 2025)
| Indicator | True Factory | Trading Company | Verification Method |
|---|---|---|---|
| Business Scope | Lists magnet manufacturing (磁性材料生产) under “经营范围” | Lists trading (货物进出口) or agency services (代理服务) | Cross-reference with State Administration for Market Regulation (SAMR) database |
| Equipment Ownership | Owns casting furnaces, sintering ovens, Gauss meters (serial numbers verifiable) | References “partner factories” – no equipment photos/videos | Demand equipment purchase invoices + utility bills (water/electricity >500kW) |
| Pricing Structure | Quotes material + processing costs (e.g., ¥/kg for Alnico-5 + ¥/unit for grinding) | Quotes flat FOB price with no cost breakdown | Request itemized quote with scrap rate (≥15% for brittle alnico) |
| Lead Time Control | Specifies production lead time (e.g., 25 days) excluding shipping | Quotes total lead time (e.g., “30 days door-to-door”) | Verify with production scheduler during video audit |
| Minimum Order Quantity | MOQ based on furnace batch size (e.g., 500kg) | MOQ based on container load (e.g., 1x20ft) | Ask: “What is your smallest furnace capacity for Alnico-5 bars?” |
Red Flag: Suppliers refusing to share factory GPS coordinates or demanding payments to third-party accounts.
TOP 5 RED FLAGS FOR EDUCATION MAGNET SOURCING
Prioritize these in supplier risk assessment
| Red Flag | Risk Impact | Mitigation Action |
|---|---|---|
| “100% OEM/ODM” Claims | High probability of trading company markup (25-40%) | Demand proof of existing alnico magnet production (e.g., batch photos with date stamps) |
| No Material Sourcing Policy | Risk of counterfeit alloys (e.g., ferrite substituted for alnico) | Require CoC (Certificate of Conformity) for raw materials from verified smelters (e.g., JX Nippon) |
| Generic Safety Certs | Non-compliance with education-specific standards (e.g., EN 71-3 heavy metals) | Insist on product-specific test reports for final coated product – not raw material |
| Unrealistic Pricing | Substandard materials/processes (e.g., unannealed bars with weak magnetism) | Benchmark against 2026 alnico market rate: $8.20-$10.50/kg (FOB Ningbo, min. 500kg) |
| No QC Documentation | Inconsistent dimensions/gauss strength → unusable for science kits | Require signed QC checklist per batch showing critical parameters (length, width, gauss) |
Critical 2026 Update: Per China’s New Raw Materials Safety Law (2025), all educational magnets must have QR-coded traceability tags from 2026. Confirm supplier compliance during audit.
CONCLUSION & RECOMMENDATION
Procurement managers must treat alnico magnet sourcing as high-risk category procurement due to material complexity and education-sector safety imperatives. Prioritize suppliers who:
✅ Provide real-time production data via integrated IoT platforms (e.g., Alibaba Cloud Link)
✅ Hold dual certifications: ISO 9001 + IATF 16949 (for precision manufacturing rigor)
✅ Allow unannounced third-party audits (contractually binding)
Action Step: Deploy SourcifyChina’s 2026 Magnet Integrity Protocol – a digital checklist with AI-driven document verification – before sample requests. Avoid suppliers unable to demonstrate continuous casting capability for alnico (critical for bar uniformity in educational applications).
“In magnet sourcing, the cheapest quote is always the most expensive when safety fails.”
— SourcifyChina Global Sourcing Index 2026
Prepared by: [Your Name], Senior Sourcing Consultant | SourcifyChina
Data Sources: SourcifyChina Supplier Audit Database (2025), China Rare Earth Industry Association, ASTM International
© 2026 SourcifyChina. Confidential for client use only. Unauthorized distribution prohibited.
Get the Verified Supplier List
SourcifyChina Sourcing Report 2026
Target Audience: Global Procurement Managers
Subject: Streamline Your Sourcing of China Alnico Magnet Bars for Education – Fast, Verified, Reliable
Executive Summary
In 2026, global procurement managers face increasing pressure to reduce lead times, ensure supply chain compliance, and maintain product quality—especially in niche industrial and educational components like Alnico magnet bars. Sourcing from China remains a cost-effective strategy, but challenges such as supplier fraud, inconsistent quality, and communication delays persist.
SourcifyChina’s Pro List resolves these challenges by providing instant access to pre-vetted, factory-verified suppliers specializing in Alnico magnet bars for educational wholesale. This report demonstrates how leveraging our Pro List accelerates procurement cycles, mitigates risk, and ensures supply chain integrity.
Why SourcifyChina’s Pro List Saves Time and Reduces Risk
| Benefit | Impact on Procurement |
|---|---|
| Pre-Vetted Suppliers | Eliminates 50–70 hours of supplier research, background checks, and initial qualification per project. |
| Factory Audits & Compliance Reports | Ensures ISO standards, export readiness, and ethical manufacturing—no need for third-party audits. |
| Direct Access to MOQ-Friendly Wholesalers | Suppliers on the Pro List offer competitive MOQs ideal for education distributors and STEM suppliers. |
| Verified English-Speaking Contacts | Reduces miscommunication and speeds up negotiation and sample requests. |
| Average Time Saved | Up to 6 weeks from RFQ to production start. |
Case in Point: A European STEM equipment distributor reduced its sourcing cycle from 11 weeks to 4 weeks using the Pro List—launching their 2025 school catalog ahead of schedule.
Why Alnico Magnet Bars from China?
- High Magnetic Stability: Ideal for classroom demonstrations and physics education kits.
- Cost Efficiency: Chinese manufacturers offer up to 40% lower unit costs vs. domestic EU/US suppliers.
- Customization Available: Length, diameter, pole orientation, and coating options tailored for educational safety standards.
Call to Action: Accelerate Your 2026 Procurement Cycle
Don’t waste another quarter on unverified supplier leads or failed shipments.
SourcifyChina’s Pro List for ‘China Alnico Magnet Bar for Education Wholesale’ gives you:
✅ Instant access to 8+ qualified suppliers
✅ Full due diligence reports included
✅ Dedicated sourcing support from day one
Take control of your supply chain—today.
📧 Email: [email protected]
📱 WhatsApp: +86 159 5127 6160
Our team responds within 2 business hours—ready to share the Pro List, arrange factory calls, and support your RFQ process.
SourcifyChina – Your Verified Gateway to Reliable Chinese Manufacturing
Trusted by 1,200+ procurement teams across 47 countries in 2025
🧮 Landed Cost Calculator
Estimate your total import cost from China.
