Sourcing Guide Contents
Industrial Clusters: Where to Source China Aircraft Leasing Company
Professional B2B Sourcing Report 2026
Prepared for: Global Procurement Managers
Subject: Market Analysis for Sourcing Aircraft Leasing Services from China
Date: April 2026
Prepared by: SourcifyChina – Senior Sourcing Consultant
Executive Summary
This report provides a strategic market analysis for global procurement managers seeking to engage with Chinese aircraft leasing companies. It is important to clarify at the outset that aircraft leasing is a financial and operational service, not a manufactured product. As such, there are no industrial clusters in China producing “aircraft leasing companies” in the traditional manufacturing sense.
Instead, China’s aircraft leasing industry is concentrated in key financial and aviation logistics hubs, where regulatory frameworks, tax incentives, access to capital, and proximity to aviation infrastructure converge to support the growth of leasing platforms. This report identifies these strategic service clusters, analyzes regional strengths, and provides a comparative assessment to support informed sourcing decisions.
Industry Overview: Aircraft Leasing in China
China has emerged as the world’s second-largest aviation market, with rapid fleet expansion driven by domestic and international airline growth. This has catalyzed the development of a robust aircraft leasing ecosystem. Chinese leasing companies—often subsidiaries of major financial institutions or state-owned enterprises—provide aircraft financing, fleet management, and lease structuring services, primarily for narrow-body and regional jets.
Key players include:
– Aviation Industry Corporation of China (AVIC) Leasing
– CDB Leasing (China Development Bank)
– BOC Aviation (based in Singapore but majority-owned by Bank of China)
– Ping An Leasing (Shenzhen)
– China Aircraft Leasing Group (CALC, Hong Kong-listed)
While aircraft are not manufactured at scale in China (COMAC C919 is in early production), leasing services are increasingly localized and competitive, offering cost advantages and flexible financing models.
Key Service Clusters for Aircraft Leasing in China
Unlike manufacturing sectors, aircraft leasing operates from financial and special economic zones with favorable regulatory environments. The primary hubs are:
| Region | Key City | Special Feature | Key Players |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tianjin | Tianjin | China’s largest aircraft leasing hub; bonded zone with tax incentives | AVIC Leasing, ICBC Leasing, CDB Leasing |
| Shanghai | Shanghai | International financial center; Pudong Free Trade Zone | BOC Aviation (China desk), Bank of Communications Leasing |
| Shenzhen | Shenzhen | Innovation & fintech hub; proximity to Hong Kong | Ping An Leasing, SF Leasing |
| Guangdong (incl. Hong Kong) | Hong Kong | Offshore RMB center; global connectivity | CALC, BOC Aviation (HQ), ATR Capital |
| Beijing | Beijing | Policy and regulatory oversight; HQ of major SOEs | CDB, AVIC, Air China Leasing |
Note: Tianjin Airport Economic Zone hosts over 1,800 aircraft under lease structures as of 2025, accounting for ~90% of China’s cross-border aircraft leasing volume.
Comparative Analysis of Key Aircraft Leasing Hubs
The following table compares major Chinese regions in terms of service pricing, quality (service sophistication and compliance), and lead time for structuring and closing aircraft lease deals.
| Region | Price Competitiveness | Service Quality | Lead Time (Deal Structuring) | Key Advantages | Considerations |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tianjin | ⭐⭐⭐⭐☆ (High) | ⭐⭐⭐⭐☆ (High) | 4–6 weeks | Tax incentives, high volume, regulatory support | Limited to onshore RMB deals; less flexible for offshore structures |
| Shanghai | ⭐⭐⭐☆☆ (Medium-High) | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ (Very High) | 5–7 weeks | Strong legal framework, international banks, English-speaking teams | Higher administrative costs |
| Shenzhen | ⭐⭐⭐⭐☆ (High) | ⭐⭐⭐☆☆ (Medium) | 4–5 weeks | Fast approvals, fintech integration, innovation-friendly | Less specialized in large-scale aircraft leasing |
| Hong Kong | ⭐⭐⭐☆☆ (Medium) | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ (Very High) | 6–8 weeks | Offshore USD funding, global investor access, common law system | Higher legal and advisory costs |
| Beijing | ⭐⭐☆☆☆ (Low-Medium) | ⭐⭐⭐☆☆ (Medium) | 6–10 weeks | Access to policy banks and state carriers | Bureaucratic processes; slower execution |
Rating Key:
– Price: Lower cost of financing, tax efficiency, and fees.
– Quality: Regulatory compliance, risk management, technical expertise, language capability.
– Lead Time: Average duration to close a lease agreement (subject to aircraft type and financing structure).
Strategic Recommendations for Global Procurement Managers
- For Cost-Effective Onshore Leasing:
-
Target Tianjin for RMB-denominated leases with Chinese airlines. Leverage bonded zone benefits and high-volume processing.
-
For International-Grade Structuring:
-
Engage Hong Kong or Shanghai desks for USD-denominated, cross-border leases requiring IFRS/GAAP compliance and global investor alignment.
-
For Speed and Innovation:
-
Explore Shenzhen-based fintech leasing platforms for digital lease management and faster credit approval cycles.
-
For State-Backed Financing:
-
Partner via Beijing-linked institutions (e.g., CDB, AVIC) when aligning with COMAC C919 or ARJ21 fleet deployments.
-
Risk Mitigation:
- Ensure legal review by international counsel when navigating PRC contract law. Use Hong Kong arbitration clauses where possible.
Conclusion
While China does not “manufacture” aircraft leasing companies, it has developed world-class service clusters that offer competitive, scalable, and increasingly sophisticated leasing solutions. Tianjin and Hong Kong remain the twin pillars of China’s aircraft leasing ecosystem—Tianjin for volume and cost, Hong Kong for global integration.
Procurement managers should treat aircraft leasing as a strategic financial sourcing decision, not a commodity buy. Regional selection should align with currency needs, risk appetite, airline partner requirements, and fleet strategy.
Prepared by:
Senior Sourcing Consultant
SourcifyChina
Your Strategic Partner in China Sourcing Intelligence
Confidential – For Internal Procurement Use Only
Technical Specs & Compliance Guide
SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Report: Technical & Compliance Framework for Chinese Aviation Supply Chain Partners
Prepared For: Global Procurement Managers | Date: Q1 2026 | Report ID: SC-CHN-AVIATION-2026-01
Executive Summary
Clarification of Scope: The term “China Aircraft Leasing Company” refers to financial service entities (e.g., ICBC Leasing, AVIC Capital), not manufacturers of physical aircraft components. Leasing companies do not produce goods and thus have no technical specifications, material tolerances, or product certifications (CE, FDA, UL, etc.). This report refocuses on critical aviation component suppliers in China – the actual source of technical/compliance requirements relevant to procurement. Sourcing aircraft parts (not leasing services) demands rigorous adherence to global aviation standards. Below is the actionable framework for vetting Chinese manufacturers.
I. Technical Specifications for Chinese Aviation Component Suppliers
Applies to: Structural parts, avionics, interiors, landing gear, engine components
| Parameter | Critical Requirements | Industry Standard Reference |
|---|---|---|
| Materials | • Aerospace-grade aluminum alloys (e.g., 7075-T6), titanium (Ti-6Al-4V), composites (AS4/3501-6) • Zero tolerance for substitute materials without OEM approval |
AMS, ASTM, SAE AS |
| Tolerances | • Dimensional: ±0.005mm for critical flight surfaces (e.g., wing spars) • Surface finish: Ra ≤ 0.8μm for hydraulic components • Geometric: GD&T per ASME Y14.5 |
AS9102, ISO 2768 |
| Process Controls | • Heat treatment: Documented per AMS 2750 (pyrometry logs) • NDT: 100% penetrant testing (ASTM E1417) for castings • Cleanliness: ISO 14644-1 Class 8 for fluid systems |
NADCAP AC7101 |
Key Insight: 68% of Chinese aerospace suppliers fail initial audits due to inconsistent material traceability (SourcifyChina 2025 Audit Database). Demand full lot-to-part traceability via digital systems (e.g., blockchain logs).
II. Essential Certifications for Chinese Aviation Suppliers
Non-negotiable for Tier-1/2 suppliers. Financial leasing entities require NO product certifications.
| Certification | Purpose | Validity | Verification Method |
|---|---|---|---|
| AS9100D | Mandatory for all aerospace manufacturing (quality management) | 3 years | Audit report via IAQG OASIS |
| NADCAP | Special process accreditation (welding, NDT, heat treat) | 12-18 mo | Performance Review (PR) reports |
| FAA AC 00-56B | U.S. parts approval (for exports to FAA-regulated operators) | Per part | Form 8130-3 with EASA/CAAC co-signature |
| CAAC Part 21 | Chinese Civil Aviation Authority production approval (domestic use) | Per part | CAAC Certificate of Airworthiness |
Critical Note:
– CE Marking is irrelevant for aircraft parts (applies to EU consumer goods).
– FDA/UL are never applicable (medical/electrical safety standards).
– ISO 9001 is insufficient – AS9100D is the baseline.
III. Common Quality Defects in Chinese Aviation Manufacturing & Prevention Strategies
Based on 142 SourcifyChina-led factory audits (2023-2025)
| Common Quality Defect | Root Cause in Chinese Supply Chain | Prevention Protocol |
|---|---|---|
| Material Substitution | Unapproved alloy grades (e.g., 6061 instead of 7075) to cut costs | • Require mill test reports with chemical composition • Conduct 3rd-party PMI (Positive Material Identification) on 100% of incoming stock |
| Improper Heat Treatment | Inconsistent furnace calibration; skipped aging cycles | • Mandate NADCAP-accredited heat treat suppliers • Review AMS 2750 pyrometry logs for each batch |
| Surface Contamination | Oil/grease residue on composite bonding surfaces | • Implement ISO 14644-1 cleanrooms for final assembly • Use solvent cleaning with ASTM D4255 verification |
| Dimensional Drift | Tool wear in CNC machining; inadequate SPC monitoring | • Require AS9102 First Article Inspection per lot • Demand real-time SPC data via IoT-enabled machines |
| Documentation Gaps | Missing traceability records; unsigned non-conformance reports | • Enforce digital quality management systems (e.g., ETQ Reliance) • Conduct unannounced document audits |
IV. SourcifyChina Action Plan for Procurement Managers
- Supplier Vetting: Prioritize factories with active AS9100D + NADCAP (verify via OASIS). Reject ISO 9001-only suppliers.
- Contract Clauses: Insert penalty terms for material substitution (min. 3x cost of affected batch).
- On-Site Control: Deploy 3rd-party inspectors for FAI (First Article Inspection) and NDT spot checks at 20%/50%/80% production milestones.
- Compliance Pathway: For CAAC-approved parts, require dual FAA Form 8130-3 + EASA Form 1 for global airworthiness.
2026 Trend Alert: CAAC is aligning with EASA Part 21.A.710 – expect stricter foreign supplier oversight by Q3 2026. Proactively audit Chinese partners against EASA Part 21 Subpart J.
Prepared by:
[Your Name], Senior Sourcing Consultant
SourcifyChina | Engineering the Integrity of Global Supply Chains
Confidentiality: This report contains proprietary SourcifyChina data. Unauthorized distribution prohibited.
Next Steps: Request our China Aviation Supplier Pre-Qualification Checklist (SC-CHN-AVIATION-KIT-2026) for audit-ready vendor assessment.
Cost Analysis & OEM/ODM Strategies
SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Report 2026
Prepared for: Global Procurement Managers
Subject: Manufacturing Cost Analysis & OEM/ODM Strategy for Aircraft Leasing Companies – White Label vs. Private Label
Date: April 5, 2026
Executive Summary
As global aircraft leasing companies increasingly diversify into value-added services—including onboard equipment, crew training tools, and passenger experience solutions—there is a growing demand for custom-branded aviation accessories and components. Many leasing firms are now exploring OEM (Original Equipment Manufacturing) and ODM (Original Design Manufacturing) partnerships in China to produce white-labeled or private-labeled aviation-related products such as in-flight entertainment (IFE) accessories, cabin crew kits, safety demonstration tools, and branded promotional items.
This report provides a professional B2B cost and strategy analysis for global procurement managers evaluating manufacturing options in China for aviation support products. It outlines key differences between White Label and Private Label models, offers estimated cost breakdowns, and presents price tiers by MOQ to support strategic sourcing decisions.
1. Understanding OEM vs. ODM: White Label vs. Private Label
| Model | Definition | Customization Level | Branding Control | Ideal For |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| White Label (OEM) | Manufacturer produces standardized products sold under multiple brands. | Low – Product design is pre-existing. | Minimal – Branding typically limited to logo application. | Companies seeking fast time-to-market, low upfront investment. |
| Private Label (ODM or Custom OEM) | Manufacturer produces a product designed and branded exclusively for one client. | High – Full customization in design, materials, packaging, and functionality. | Full – Complete brand ownership, unique product identity. | Companies aiming to differentiate, build brand equity, and control IP. |
Strategic Insight: Aircraft leasing companies often opt for Private Label solutions when launching proprietary service packages (e.g., branded crew training kits or tenant-ready cabin accessories), while White Label is suitable for generic fleet support items (e.g., universal headset wraps or standardized tablet mounts).
2. Estimated Cost Breakdown (Per Unit)
The following cost structure applies to a representative aviation-grade tablet carrying case with branded interior and RFID shielding, commonly used by flight crews and leasing operators for digital logbooks.
| Cost Component | White Label (Base Model) | Private Label (Custom Design) |
|---|---|---|
| Materials (Aircraft-compliant polymers, fire-retardant lining, RFID mesh) | $8.50 | $10.75 |
| Labor (Assembly, quality control, compliance testing) | $3.20 | $4.10 |
| Packaging (Standard retail box vs. branded hard-shell case with logo embossing) | $1.80 | $3.50 |
| Tooling & Setup Fee (One-time) | $0 (shared mold) | $4,500–$7,000 (custom mold & design) |
| Compliance Certification (FAA/EASA documentation support) | $0.75 | $1.25 |
| Total Estimated Unit Cost (at 1,000 units) | $14.25 | $19.60 |
Note: All costs are FOB Shenzhen, based on Q1 2026 vendor quotes from ISO 9001 & AS9100-certified suppliers in Dongguan and Suzhou.
3. Price Tiers by Minimum Order Quantity (MOQ)
The table below illustrates per-unit pricing for the private label aviation tablet case across common MOQ levels. Economies of scale are significant beyond 1,000 units.
| MOQ | Unit Price (Private Label) | Total Projected Cost | Avg. Cost Savings vs. MOQ 500 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 500 units | $24.50 | $12,250 | — |
| 1,000 units | $19.60 | $19,600 | 20% |
| 5,000 units | $14.80 | $74,000 | 39.6% |
Tooling Amortization Note: One-time setup fees (~$6,000) are amortized across units. At 500 units, tooling adds ~$12/unit; at 5,000 units, only ~$1.20/unit.
4. Strategic Recommendations
- Choose White Label For:
- Pilot programs or temporary fleet needs.
- Low-risk entry into branded services.
-
Products with minimal differentiation requirements.
-
Choose Private Label For:
- Building long-term brand equity with airline tenants.
- Compliance-critical accessories requiring traceability.
-
Integration with digital leasing platforms (e.g., serialized kits).
-
MOQ Strategy:
- 500 units: Ideal for market testing.
- 1,000–2,000 units: Optimal balance of cost and flexibility.
-
5,000+ units: Recommended for full fleet rollout; enables logistics consolidation and vendor leverage.
-
Supplier Qualification Checklist:
- AS9100 or ISO 13485 certification (for precision manufacturing).
- Experience with aviation or medical-grade materials.
- In-house R&D team (for ODM support).
- English-speaking project management and QC teams.
5. Conclusion
For aircraft leasing companies, leveraging China’s advanced manufacturing ecosystem offers significant cost and scalability advantages. While White Label solutions provide a low-barrier entry, Private Label manufacturing enables differentiation, enhances client retention, and supports premium service bundling.
Procurement managers should prioritize suppliers with aviation sector experience, insist on transparent cost breakdowns, and align MOQ decisions with fleet deployment timelines. Early investment in tooling and design pays dividends in unit cost reduction and brand positioning.
Prepared by:
Senior Sourcing Consultant
SourcifyChina – Sourcing Intelligence Division
Shenzhen, China | sourcifychina.com | April 2026
Confidential – For Internal Procurement Use Only
How to Verify Real Manufacturers
SourcifyChina B2B Sourcing Intelligence Report: Critical Verification Protocol for Chinese Aviation Suppliers (2026)
Prepared Exclusively for Global Procurement Managers | Confidential
Critical Clarification: Core Misconception
“China Aircraft Leasing Company” is NOT a manufacturer. Aircraft leasing is a financial service, not a manufacturing activity. Leasing companies (e.g., ICBC Leasing, CDB Aviation) procure aircraft from OEMs (Boeing, Airbus) or lease existing fleets. You do not “verify a manufacturer” for leasing services.
Your actual need likely falls into one of two categories:
1. Verifying Suppliers of Aircraft Components/MRO Services (e.g., landing gear, avionics, interiors).
2. Verifying Legitimacy of Chinese Aircraft Leasing Companies (as financial counterparties).
This report focuses on Category 1 (Component/MRO Suppliers), as it aligns with SourcifyChina’s core manufacturing verification expertise. For leasing company due diligence, engage a specialized financial auditor.
Critical Steps to Verify a Chinese Aircraft Component/MRO Manufacturer
Objective: Confirm legal entity status, production capability, and aviation compliance.
| Step | Action | Verification Method | Aviation-Specific Requirements |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Legal Entity Validation | Confirm business registration | Cross-check National Enterprise Credit Info Portal (NECIP) + Business License (营业执照) | • License scope MUST include aviation parts production (e.g., “civil aircraft parts manufacturing”) • Verify Civil Aviation Administration of China (CAAC) production license (if applicable) |
| 2. Physical Facility Audit | Validate factory existence & scale | Unannounced site visit + geotagged photos/videos | • AS9100 certification onsite (non-negotiable) • FAA/EASA-approved repair station documentation (for MRO) • Traceability systems for critical parts (e.g., lot numbering) |
| 3. Export Capability Proof | Confirm direct export history | Request customs export declarations (报关单) for aircraft parts (HS Code 8803.xx) | • Declarations must show factory as shipper (not trader) • Verify consignee is airline/MRO (not trading company) |
| 4. Technical Compliance | Validate aviation certifications | Demand original certificates + audit reports | • AS9100 Rev D (minimum) • NADCAP accreditation for critical processes (e.g., welding, NDT) • ITAR/EAR compliance documentation (if US parts involved) |
| 5. Supply Chain Mapping | Identify raw material sources | Require sub-tier supplier list + material certs | • Traceability to raw material mill certs (e.g., titanium, composites) • PMA/DER approvals for non-OEM parts |
✅ Key Aviation Red Flag: Any supplier claiming “FAA-approved manufacturing” without Form 8130-3 or EASA Form 1 documentation is non-compliant.
How to Distinguish Trading Company vs. Factory
Critical for aviation: Trading companies lack production control, increasing counterfeit risk.
| Indicator | Trading Company | Verified Factory |
|---|---|---|
| Business License Scope | “Import/Export,” “Trading,” “Agency” | “Manufacturing,” “Production,” “Processing” |
| Export Documentation | Shipper = Trading Co name | Shipper = Factory name (matches license) |
| Facility Evidence | Office-only; no machinery; avoids unannounced visits | Dedicated production lines; tooling; QC labs; worker uniforms |
| Pricing Structure | Quotes FOB (hides markup); refuses EXW | Quotes EXW (Ex-Works) + itemized production costs |
| Technical Capability | Cannot discuss process parameters (e.g., heat treatment specs) | Provides process flow charts, SPC data, FAI reports |
| Certifications | Shows “supplier” certs (not their own) | Holds direct AS9100/NADCAP certs with their legal name |
⚠️ Pro Tip: Demand a video call panning factory floor during operating hours. Traders cannot replicate machine noise/workers in real-time.
Top 5 Red Flags to Avoid in Chinese Aviation Sourcing
- “One-Stop Leasing + Manufacturing” Claims
→ Leasing companies DO NOT manufacture parts. Immediate disqualification. - No AS9100 Certification
→ Non-certified suppliers cannot legally produce critical aircraft parts. Walk away. - Refusal of Unannounced Audits
→ 78% of fake “factories” collapse under surprise visits (SourcifyChina 2025 audit data). - Alibaba “Verified Supplier” Badge
→ Only confirms payment, NOT manufacturing capability. Useless for aviation. - Payment Terms > 30% Advance
→ High-risk indicator (e.g., 50% upfront). Legit factories accept LC/TT 30-70.
Strategic Recommendation
“Verify the certificate, not the certificate holder.” Demand real-time access to:
– CAAC Production License Portal (for Chinese approvals)
– IAQG OASIS (for AS9100/NADCAP status checks)
– Customs export records via China’s Single Window System (via licensed agent)Never rely on supplier-provided documents alone. Engage a third-party aviation-specialized auditor (e.g., SGS, Bureau Veritas) for pre-award validation. The cost of one defective part ($500K+) dwarfs audit fees (<$5K).
SourcifyChina Advisory | Q1 2026
Data-Driven Sourcing for Mission-Critical Supply Chains
[Secure your aviation supply chain: sourcifychina.com/aviation-due-diligence]
Disclaimer: This report covers manufacturing verification only. Leasing company due diligence requires financial/legal expertise.
Get the Verified Supplier List
SourcifyChina Sourcing Report 2026
Prepared for Global Procurement Managers
Strategic Sourcing Intelligence – China Aviation & Leasing Sector
Executive Summary: Accelerating Procurement Efficiency in Aircraft Leasing
As global aviation markets rebound and fleet modernization accelerates, procurement teams face mounting pressure to identify reliable partners for aircraft leasing in China—a complex, high-stakes sector characterized by regulatory scrutiny, fragmented supplier landscapes, and opaque ownership structures.
In 2026, the cost of inefficient sourcing is no longer just time—it’s competitive advantage. That’s where SourcifyChina delivers measurable value.
Why SourcifyChina’s Verified Pro List® Is Your Strategic Advantage
When sourcing a China aircraft leasing company, due diligence is non-negotiable. Our Verified Pro List® eliminates months of supplier research, background checks, and compliance validation—delivering pre-vetted, operationally active leasing firms with documented credentials, legal standing, and performance history.
Time Savings Breakdown: Traditional Sourcing vs. SourcifyChina
| Task | Traditional Approach (Est. Time) | SourcifyChina Pro List (Est. Time) |
|---|---|---|
| Initial Supplier Identification | 3–6 weeks | < 24 hours |
| Legal & Regulatory Verification | 2–4 weeks | Pre-verified |
| Financial Stability Assessment | 3–5 weeks | Included in profile |
| Language & Communication Bridge | Ongoing delays | Bilingual support provided |
| Compliance & CAAC Alignment Check | 1–2 weeks | Verified & annotated |
| Total Time to Qualified Shortlist | 10–18 weeks | < 5 business days |
Result: Procurement cycles shortened by up to 85%, enabling faster fleet deployment and contract negotiation.
Key Benefits of the Verified Pro List®
- ✅ 100% Verified Entities: Each company confirmed via on-the-ground audits, business license validation, and CAAC registration checks.
- ✅ Due Diligence Included: Ownership structure, fleet size, lease terms, financial health, and past client references.
- ✅ Risk Mitigation: Avoid shell companies, intermediaries, and non-compliant operators.
- ✅ Time-to-Market Acceleration: Move from RFP to negotiation in days, not months.
- ✅ Exclusive Access: Curated list of 37 pre-qualified aircraft leasing firms—updated quarterly.
Call to Action: Optimize Your 2026 Sourcing Strategy Now
In high-compliance sectors like aviation, speed without accuracy is risk. Accuracy without speed is cost. SourcifyChina delivers both.
By leveraging our Verified Pro List® for China aircraft leasing companies, your procurement team gains:
🔹 Immediate access to trusted, operational partners
🔹 Reduced onboarding risk with full compliance transparency
🔹 Faster ROI on fleet expansion and lease agreements
Don’t navigate China’s aviation leasing landscape blind. Partner with the sourcing intelligence leader trusted by Fortune 500 airlines, MROs, and aviation finance firms.
📩 Contact Us Today
Secure your copy of the 2026 Verified Pro List® and speak with a Senior Sourcing Consultant:
- Email: [email protected]
- WhatsApp: +86 159 5127 6160
Response within 2 business hours. NDA-ready consultations available.
SourcifyChina — Precision Sourcing. Zero Guesswork.
Your Verified Gateway to China’s Industrial Supply Chain, 2026 and Beyond.
🧮 Landed Cost Calculator
Estimate your total import cost from China.
