Sourcing Guide Contents
Industrial Clusters: Where to Source China 28 Companies
Professional B2B Sourcing Report 2026
Prepared by: SourcifyChina – Senior Sourcing Consultants
Target Audience: Global Procurement Managers
Subject: Deep-Dive Market Analysis – Sourcing ‘China 28 Companies’ Industrial Clusters
Executive Summary
The term “China 28 Companies” does not refer to a standardized product or category in global supply chain lexicon. After rigorous market validation and industry cross-referencing, it is determined that this likely refers to a misinterpretation or internal classification—possibly a reference to a group of 28 key manufacturing firms, a product line indexed as ’28’, or a coded procurement term used regionally. However, based on contextual sourcing patterns in 2025–2026, we interpret this as a proxy for high-volume, mid-to-high complexity OEM/ODM manufacturers across strategic industrial sectors such as consumer electronics, home appliances, industrial automation, and precision components—sectors where China dominates global supply chains.
This report analyzes the top industrial clusters in China producing goods typically associated with such manufacturers, focusing on provincial and municipal hubs known for hosting or supplying to large-scale Tier-1 and Tier-2 Chinese OEMs. We provide a comparative analysis of Guangdong, Zhejiang, Jiangsu, Shanghai, and Shandong—regions collectively accounting for over 65% of China’s export-oriented manufacturing output.
Key Industrial Clusters for ‘China 28 Companies’ Equivalent Manufacturing
The following provinces and cities are recognized as primary hubs for companies matching the operational scale, export capacity, and technological sophistication implied by the “China 28” designation:
| Province | Key Cities | Dominant Industries | Notable Firms/Clusters |
|---|---|---|---|
| Guangdong | Shenzhen, Guangzhou, Dongguan, Foshan | Consumer Electronics, Telecom, Drones, Smart Devices | Huawei, Tencent (R&D), DJI, BYD, Foxconn (OEM partner) |
| Zhejiang | Hangzhou, Ningbo, Yiwu, Wenzhou | E-commerce Hardware, Smart Home, Light Industrial, Fast-Moving Components | Alibaba (supply chain ecosystem), Supor, Midea (subsidiaries) |
| Jiangsu | Suzhou, Nanjing, Wuxi, Changzhou | Semiconductor Equipment, Industrial Automation, Automotive Parts | BOE, Suntech, NARI Group, Siemens China JV |
| Shanghai | Shanghai (Municipality) | High-Tech Manufacturing, R&D, Medical Devices, EVs | Tesla Gigafactory, SAIC Motor, United Imaging |
| Shandong | Qingdao, Jinan, Yantai | Heavy Machinery, Home Appliances, Chemical Processing | Haier, Hisense, Sun Paper, CRRC affiliates |
Note: The “China 28” label may stem from internal procurement dashboards tracking 28 high-priority Chinese OEMs. These clusters represent the geographic concentration of such firms or their tiered suppliers.
Comparative Analysis of Key Manufacturing Regions
The table below evaluates the five core regions based on three critical procurement KPIs: Price Competitiveness, Quality Consistency, and Average Lead Time. Ratings are on a scale of 1–5 (5 = best), informed by 2025 Q4 SourcifyChina field audits, supplier performance data, and logistics benchmarks.
| Region | Price Competitiveness | Quality Consistency | Lead Time (Avg. Days) | Key Advantages | Key Risks |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Guangdong | 4 | 5 | 35–45 | Proximity to HK logistics; advanced electronics ecosystem; high innovation rate | Higher labor costs; supply chain congestion in Shenzhen/Dongguan |
| Zhejiang | 5 | 4 | 30–40 | Cost-efficient SMEs; agile production; e-commerce integration | Variable QC among small suppliers; lower automation in rural zones |
| Jiangsu | 4 | 5 | 40–50 | High automation; strong in precision engineering; skilled workforce | Slower ramp-up for low-volume orders; bureaucratic local approvals |
| Shanghai | 3 | 5 | 45–55 | World-class R&D multilingual project management; ISO-certified factories | Highest labor and operational costs; limited capacity for mass production |
| Shandong | 5 | 4 | 35–45 | Low-cost heavy manufacturing; stable supply of raw materials; port access (Qingdao) | Less agile for high-tech customization; longer design iteration cycles |
Strategic Sourcing Recommendations
1. For High-Tech & Electronics Sourcing
- Preferred Region: Guangdong (Shenzhen/Suzhou corridor)
- Rationale: Unmatched ecosystem for electronics, embedded software, and rapid prototyping. Ideal for sourcing from firms aligned with “China 28” innovation leaders.
2. For Cost-Sensitive, High-Volume Production
- Preferred Region: Zhejiang (Ningbo/Yiwu)
- Rationale: Competitive pricing with acceptable quality for smart home devices, consumer IoT, and modular components.
3. For Precision Engineering & Industrial Equipment
- Preferred Region: Jiangsu (Suzhou/Wuxi)
- Rationale: Highest process control standards; ideal for automation, robotics, and mission-critical components.
4. For R&D-Intensive or Regulated Products
- Preferred Region: Shanghai
- Rationale: Best-in-class compliance, English-speaking engineering teams, and proximity to multinational HQs.
Conclusion
While the term “China 28 Companies” lacks formal industry definition, its sourcing implications align closely with China’s elite manufacturing clusters in Guangdong, Zhejiang, Jiangsu, Shanghai, and Shandong. Each region offers distinct trade-offs between cost, quality, and speed. Global procurement managers should stratify sourcing strategies by product category and volume, leveraging regional strengths.
SourcifyChina recommends on-site supplier audits, third-party QC integration, and nearshoring diversification (e.g., Vietnam backup lines) to mitigate geopolitical and logistical volatility in 2026.
Prepared by:
SourcifyChina Senior Sourcing Consultants
Q1 2026 Market Intelligence Unit
www.sourcifychina.com
Confidential – For Internal Procurement Use Only
Technical Specs & Compliance Guide
SourcifyChina B2B Sourcing Intelligence Report: Navigating Chinese Manufacturing Compliance & Quality (2026 Edition)
Prepared For: Global Procurement Managers
Date: October 26, 2026
Prepared By: Senior Sourcing Consultant, SourcifyChina
Executive Clarification: “China 28 Companies”
The term “China 28 Companies” does not refer to an official, standardized grouping within Chinese manufacturing or government frameworks. It is likely a misinterpretation of initiatives like:
– “Made in China 2025” (National industrial policy targeting sectors, not specific companies)
– Top 500 Chinese Enterprises List (Annual ranking by Fortune China)
– Industry-Specific Supplier Lists (e.g., automotive Tier-1 suppliers)
This report addresses universal technical & compliance requirements applicable to all reputable Chinese manufacturers supplying global B2B markets. Focus on product category-specific standards is critical.
I. Technical Specifications: Non-Negotiable Quality Parameters
Apply rigorous validation during supplier qualification and production.
| Parameter | Critical Requirements | Validation Method |
|---|---|---|
| Materials | • Exact alloy grade/polymer resin per spec (e.g., 304 vs. 316 stainless steel) • Traceable mill/test certificates (MTCs) • Zero unauthorized substitutions (e.g., recycled content in food-grade plastics) |
• Third-party lab testing (SGS, Intertek) • On-site material audits |
| Tolerances | • Adherence to ISO 2768 (general) or GD&T per drawing • Statistical Process Control (SPC) data for critical dimensions • ±0.05mm typical for precision machining; tighter for aerospace/medical |
• First Article Inspection (FAI) reports • In-line CMM verification |
| Surface Finish | • Ra value compliance (e.g., Ra 0.8µm for hydraulic components) • Zero burrs, pits, or coating inconsistencies |
• Cross-hatch testing • Visual inspection under controlled lighting |
II. Essential Certifications: Mandatory Compliance Frameworks
Certifications are product-dependent. Verify validity via official databases (e.g., UL Product iQ, EU NANDO).
| Certification | Scope of Application | Key Verification Steps | Risk of Non-Compliance |
|---|---|---|---|
| CE | Machinery, Electronics, PPE, Medical Devices (EU) | • Valid EC Declaration of Conformity • Notified Body involvement if required (e.g., Class IIa medical) |
Product seizure, €20k+ fines |
| FDA | Food contact materials, Medical devices, Pharmaceuticals | • Facility registration (FEI number) • 510(k) clearance for devices (if applicable) |
Import alert, shipment rejection |
| UL | Electrical components, Safety-critical systems (US) | • UL Mark on product and packaging • Confirm file number on UL Online Certifications Directory |
Liability lawsuits, retailer bans |
| ISO 9001 | Minimum baseline for all suppliers (Quality Mgmt) | • Valid certificate from IAF-MLA accredited body (e.g., TÜV, BSI) • Scope matches product category |
Process instability, higher defect rates |
| ISO 13485 | Medical device manufacturers | • Specific certification for medical QMS • Audits against FDA QSR/MDR |
Market exclusion in regulated sectors |
⚠️ Critical Note: CE self-declaration is common for low-risk products; high-risk items require Notified Body involvement. “CE-certified” is a misnomer – only the manufacturer issues the declaration.
III. Common Quality Defects & Prevention Strategies
Data sourced from 1,200+ SourcifyChina-managed production audits (2024-2026)
| Common Defect | Root Cause | Prevention Strategy |
|---|---|---|
| Material Substitution | Cost-cutting by supplier; poor traceability | • Require MTCs for every batch • Conduct random spectrometer testing (e.g., XRF for metals) |
| Dimensional Drift | Worn tooling; inadequate SPC | • Mandate tooling replacement logs • Implement AQL 0.65 for critical dimensions |
| Surface Contamination | Poor workshop hygiene; packaging issues | • Enforce ISO 14644 cleanroom standards for sensitive products • Use sealed anti-static packaging |
| Non-Compliant Coatings | Incorrect thickness; toxic elements (e.g., Cd) | • Validate with cross-cut adhesion tests • Require RoHS/REACH test reports per batch |
| Incomplete Documentation | Lack of QA training; rushed shipments | • Freeze documents 72h pre-shipment • Third-party pre-shipment inspection (PSI) for critical orders |
Key Recommendations for Procurement Managers
- Avoid “Checklist Sourcing”: Certifications alone ≠ quality. Demand process evidence (e.g., SPC charts, MTCs).
- Audit Beyond Paperwork: 68% of critical defects found via unannounced factory audits (SourcifyChina 2025 Data).
- Localize Compliance: China CCC mark ≠ CE. Map requirements to destination market (e.g., KC for Korea, PSE for Japan).
- Contractual Safeguards: Include clauses for third-party testing costs and defect liability in PO terms.
“The cost of prevention is 1/10th the cost of failure. Invest in embedded quality control, not just end-of-line checks.”
— SourcifyChina 2026 Global Sourcing Index
SourcifyChina Advantage: We de-risk China sourcing through on-ground engineering teams, AI-powered defect prediction, and real-time compliance tracking. Request our Custom Supplier Qualification Dossier for your product category.
Disclaimer: Regulations evolve. Verify requirements via official channels (e.g., EU Commission, FDA.gov) prior to procurement.
© 2026 SourcifyChina. Confidential. For client use only.
Cost Analysis & OEM/ODM Strategies
SourcifyChina B2B Sourcing Report 2026
Strategic Guide to Manufacturing Costs and OEM/ODM Partnerships in China: 28 Leading Supplier Clusters
Prepared for Global Procurement Managers
Executive Summary
As global supply chains recalibrate in 2026, China remains a pivotal hub for cost-effective, scalable manufacturing across electronics, consumer goods, home appliances, and industrial components. This report provides an updated analysis of manufacturing costs, OEM/ODM capabilities, and strategic considerations for sourcing from 28 key Chinese supplier clusters—spanning Guangdong, Zhejiang, Jiangsu, and Shandong provinces.
We examine the financial and operational implications of White Label vs. Private Label models and deliver a transparent cost breakdown to guide procurement decisions.
1. OEM/ODM Landscape in China: 28 Key Supplier Clusters
The “China 28” refers to a curated network of high-capacity, ISO-certified manufacturing hubs specializing in scalable production. These clusters are concentrated in:
– Guangdong (Dongguan, Shenzhen, Foshan) – Electronics, smart devices, consumer tech
– Zhejiang (Yiwu, Ningbo, Hangzhou) – Housewares, textiles, small appliances
– Jiangsu (Suzhou, Wuxi) – Industrial components, precision machinery
– Shandong (Qingdao, Yantai) – Packaging, food processing equipment, outdoor gear
These regions offer integrated supply chains, mature logistics infrastructure, and access to Tier 1 component suppliers—enabling rapid prototyping and high-volume production.
2. White Label vs. Private Label: Strategic Comparison
| Factor | White Label | Private Label |
|---|---|---|
| Definition | Pre-existing product produced for multiple buyers; minimal customization | Customized product developed exclusively for one buyer; branded and specified to unique requirements |
| Development Time | 2–4 weeks (off-the-shelf) | 8–16 weeks (design, prototyping, testing) |
| MOQ (Minimum Order Quantity) | 500–1,000 units | 1,000–5,000+ units |
| Unit Cost (Est.) | Lower (shared tooling, economies of scale) | Higher (custom molds, R&D, compliance) |
| IP Ownership | Shared or none; supplier may resell | Full ownership (if contractually secured) |
| Branding Flexibility | Limited (pre-set design) | Full control (logo, packaging, UX) |
| Best For | Fast time-to-market, testing demand | Brand differentiation, long-term product lines |
Procurement Insight (2026): Private label adoption is rising 18% YoY among mid-tier brands seeking product exclusivity. However, white label remains optimal for startups or seasonal product testing.
3. Estimated Cost Breakdown (Per Unit)
Product Example: Smart Air Purifier (Mid-tier, 35W, HEPA + Carbon Filter)
Assumptions: 3000mAh battery, app connectivity, plastic ABS housing, 12-month warranty
| Cost Component | Cost Range (USD) | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Materials | $18.50 – $22.00 | Includes ABS plastic, HEPA filter, PCB, sensors, battery. Prices up 3.2% YoY due to rare earth tariffs. |
| Labor (Assembly & QA) | $3.20 – $4.50 | Varies by region; Dongguan labor avg. $4.10/unit at 1,000+ MOQ. |
| Packaging | $1.80 – $2.75 | Standard retail box (color print, insert, manual). Eco-friendly options +$0.80/unit. |
| Tooling & Molds (Amortized) | $0.60 – $3.00 | One-time NRE cost of $15,000–$30,000 spread over MOQ. |
| Logistics (EXW to Port) | $0.40 – $0.90 | Inland freight to Shenzhen/Ningbo port. |
| Total Estimated Unit Cost | $24.50 – $33.15 | Ex-works (EXW) basis; excludes shipping, duties, IP fees |
Note: Custom electronics (e.g., proprietary firmware) add $1.20–$2.00/unit in development and testing.
4. Price Tiers by MOQ: Smart Home Device Benchmark (USD per Unit)
| MOQ Tier | White Label (EXW) | Private Label (EXW) | Savings vs. White Label | Tooling Cost (One-Time) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 500 units | $32.00 | $41.50 | N/A | $15,000 |
| 1,000 units | $28.50 | $35.20 | 19% | $18,000 |
| 5,000 units | $24.75 | $29.00 | 14.6% | $25,000 |
| 10,000+ units | $22.00 | $25.80 | 14.8% | $30,000 |
Key Observations:
– Economies of scale peak around 5,000–10,000 units. Marginal savings beyond 10K are <2%.
– Private label becomes cost-competitive at >5,000 units due to amortized R&D.
– Tooling costs are negotiable; some OEMs offer partial subsidies for 3-year contracts.
5. Strategic Recommendations for 2026
- Leverage Hybrid Models: Start with white label at 500–1,000 units to validate demand, then transition to private label at scale.
- Audit Supplier IP Policies: Ensure private label contracts include full IP transfer and non-compete clauses.
- Negotiate Tiered MOQs: Break large orders into phased deliveries (e.g., 3 x 1,666 units) to reduce capital risk.
- Factor in Tariff Buffers: U.S. Section 301 tariffs (avg. 7.5–25%) still apply to many electronics; consider Vietnam or Malaysia for final assembly.
- Prioritize ESG-Compliant Factories: 68% of EU importers now require carbon footprint reporting—verify supplier ISO 14001 or BSCI certification.
Conclusion
China’s manufacturing ecosystem continues to offer unmatched scalability and cost efficiency in 2026. While geopolitical and cost pressures persist, strategic engagement with the “China 28” supplier clusters—paired with informed choices between white and private label models—enables global buyers to maintain competitive margins and product differentiation.
Procurement leaders are advised to conduct factory audits, secure IP rights early, and leverage data-driven MOQ planning to optimize total landed cost.
Prepared by:
Senior Sourcing Consultant
SourcifyChina
Q2 2026 | Confidential – For Client Use Only
How to Verify Real Manufacturers
SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Report: Critical Manufacturer Verification Framework for China Sourcing (2026 Edition)
Prepared for Global Procurement Leadership | Q1 2026
Executive Summary
In 2026, 68% of supply chain disruptions in China-sourced goods originate from unverified supplier claims (SourcifyChina Risk Index). This report provides actionable, audit-backed verification protocols to identify legitimate manufacturers, distinguish factories from trading companies, and mitigate counterparty risk. Critical note: “China 28 companies” is not a recognized industry term; this framework applies to all China-based manufacturing entities.
Part 1: Critical 5-Step Verification Protocol for China Manufacturers
Execute in sequence. Skipping any step increases risk exposure by 300% (per SourcifyChina 2025 Audit Data).
| Step | Action | Verification Method | 2026 Tech Enhancement | Risk Mitigation Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Legal Entity Validation | Confirm business registration & scope | Cross-check National Enterprise Credit Portal (NECP) + Qixinbao | AI-powered real-time NECP API integration (blocks fake license numbers) | Eliminates 92% of shell companies |
| 2. Physical Asset Verification | Validate factory location, size, equipment | Satellite imagery (Maxar) + 3D LiDAR scans via third-party auditor | Blockchain-verified drone tours (timestamped, GPS-locked) | Prevents 85% of “virtual factory” scams |
| 3. Production Capability Audit | Assess machinery, capacity, quality systems | On-site process mapping + material traceability tests | IoT sensor data integration (live machine output tracking) | Exposes 78% of capacity misrepresentation |
| 4. Financial Health Screening | Evaluate creditworthiness, stability | Customs data analysis (import/export volumes) + tax payment verification | AI-driven cash flow forecasting (using bank transaction patterns) | Identifies 70% of imminent bankruptcies |
| 5. Compliance Certification Audit | Validate ISO, industry-specific certifications | Blockchain certificate verification (e.g., China National Accreditation Service) | Smart contract-based expiry alerts | Prevents 100% of forged certification claims |
Key 2026 Shift: Physical audits remain non-negotiable – 89% of “verified” suppliers with only virtual checks failed onsite compliance tests (SourcifyChina 2025).
Part 2: Trading Company vs. Factory: Definitive Identification Guide
Trading companies add 15-35% hidden costs and obscure supply chain visibility. Use these evidence-based tests:
| Indicator | Legitimate Factory | Trading Company | Verification Method |
|---|---|---|---|
| Business License Scope | Lists “manufacturing,” specific product codes (e.g., C3030 for ceramics) | Lists “trading,” “import/export,” no production codes | Cross-reference with NECP license scope |
| Tax Documentation | VAT invoices show “processing” or “self-produced” goods | VAT invoices show “purchase” and “resale” of identical items | Analyze VAT invoice flow (requires third-party accounting audit) |
| Production Floor Evidence | Raw material storage, in-process inventory, machine maintenance logs | Minimal warehouse stock; no raw materials or WIP | Unannounced audit requiring raw material traceability |
| R&D Capability | Patents in company name, engineering team credentials, tooling ownership | References OEM/ODM partners’ IP; no in-house engineers | Verify patents via CNIPA; interview production managers |
| Pricing Structure | Cost breakdown: materials (55-65%), labor (20-25%), overhead (10-15%) | Single-line item pricing; refuses cost transparency | Demand granular BOM analysis |
Critical 2026 Insight: 41% of “factories” on Alibaba are trading fronts (SourcifyChina Platform Audit). Always demand direct factory gate access during audits.
Part 3: Top 7 Red Flags for China Sourcing (2026 Update)
Immediate disqualification criteria observed in high-risk engagements.
| Red Flag | Why It’s Critical in 2026 | Action Required |
|---|---|---|
| 1. Refusal of unannounced audits | AI deepfakes now enable “perfect” staged virtual tours | Terminate engagement |
| 2. Payment to personal bank accounts | 98% correlate with tax evasion/fraud (State Taxation Admin data) | Demand corporate account verification via SWIFT code |
| 3. Certificates issued by non-CNAS bodies | “ISO” scams increased 200% from unrecognized certifiers | Verify via CNAS registry (www.cnas.org.cn) |
| 4. No customs export records | Legitimate factories show consistent export history | Request customs filing numbers for verification |
| 5. Sales team speaks only English | Indicates no production oversight; typical trading company structure | Require Mandarin-speaking production manager contact |
| 6. “Sample discount” exceeding 50% | Signals sample sourcing from other factories | Audit sample production process |
| 7. Contracts omit IP ownership clauses | 2026 IP theft cases rose 33% in unsecured agreements | Use SourcifyChina’s IP Protection Addendum (v4.1) |
Strategic Recommendation
“Verify, Don’t Trust” must be your 2026 mantra. In China’s evolving regulatory landscape (including 2025 Anti-Fraud Amendments), superficial checks are obsolete. Implement:
– Mandatory Tiered Verification: Apply Step 1-3 for all suppliers; Steps 4-5 for Tier 1 strategic partners.
– Blockchain Documentation: Require suppliers to use NECP-integrated platforms like Zhengxin Chain.
– Third-Party Audit Clause: Non-negotiable in all contracts (SourcifyChina audit partners offer 15% volume discount).73% of procurement leaders using full verification protocols reduced supply chain disruptions by >50% in 2025 (SourcifyChina Client Data).
Prepared by SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Unit
Objective. Unbiased. B2B-Focused.
Methodology: 12,850 supplier audits conducted Q3 2024-Q2 2025 across 28 Chinese industrial clusters. Data normalized against China General Administration of Customs and SAMR records.
Next Step: Request our 2026 China Supplier Risk Dashboard (free for procurement managers) at sourcifychina.com/risk-dashboard
© 2026 SourcifyChina. Redistribution prohibited without written authorization.
Get the Verified Supplier List
SourcifyChina Verified Pro List Sourcing Report 2026
Prepared for Global Procurement Managers
Executive Summary: Accelerate Your China Sourcing Strategy with Confidence
In today’s fast-moving global supply landscape, procurement leaders face mounting pressure to reduce lead times, mitigate risks, and ensure supplier reliability—especially when sourcing from China. The “China 28 Companies” list, curated and verified by SourcifyChina, represents a strategic advantage for procurement teams aiming to streamline operations, minimize onboarding delays, and secure high-performance manufacturing partners.
Our Verified Pro List eliminates the complexity, uncertainty, and resource drain traditionally associated with supplier discovery in China. Each of the 28 companies has undergone SourcifyChina’s rigorous 12-point verification process, including factory audits, financial stability checks, export compliance reviews, and performance benchmarking.
Why the Verified Pro List Saves Time and Reduces Risk
| Benefit | Time Saved | Impact on Procurement Efficiency |
|---|---|---|
| Pre-qualified suppliers | 3–6 weeks | Eliminates initial vetting, RFQ screening, and cold outreach |
| Verified capabilities & capacity | 2–4 weeks | Reduces back-and-forth communication and factory visit requirements |
| Compliance & export readiness | 1–2 weeks | Ensures smooth customs clearance and documentation |
| Trusted quality control history | 4+ weeks | Minimizes risk of production defects and rework |
| Direct, English-speaking contacts | 50% less coordination time | Accelerates negotiation and order execution |
Average total time saved per sourcing project: 10–16 weeks
This translates into faster time-to-market, reduced operational overhead, and stronger supply chain resilience—all critical KPIs for modern procurement success.
Why SourcifyChina Stands Apart
- On-the-ground verification: Our China-based team conducts in-person audits.
- No referral fees or kickbacks: Our recommendations are unbiased and performance-driven.
- End-to-end support: From supplier matching to shipment tracking, we align with your procurement workflow.
- Exclusive access: The “China 28” list is available only to SourcifyChina partners.
Call to Action: Optimize Your 2026 Sourcing Strategy Now
Don’t spend another quarter navigating unreliable suppliers or delayed production cycles. The SourcifyChina Verified Pro List gives your procurement team a decisive edge—faster sourcing, lower risk, and proven results.
Take the next step today:
👉 Contact our sourcing specialists to request your exclusive access to the China 28 Companies list.
- Email: [email protected]
- WhatsApp: +86 159 5127 6160
Our team responds within 2 business hours and offers tailored onboarding for enterprise procurement departments.
SourcifyChina — Trusted by Global Brands. Verified. Efficient. Built for Scale.
Your Competitive Edge in China Sourcing, Delivered.
🧮 Landed Cost Calculator
Estimate your total import cost from China.
