Sourcing Guide Contents
Industrial Clusters: Where to Source Cheap Designer Sunglasses China Wholesale
SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Report 2026
Strategic Market Analysis: Sourcing Affordable Designer Sunglasses from China
For Global Procurement & Supply Chain Leaders
Executive Summary
The global demand for affordable designer-style sunglasses continues to surge, driven by fast-fashion trends, e-commerce expansion, and rising consumer preference for premium aesthetics at accessible price points. China remains the dominant manufacturing hub for this product category, offering competitive pricing, scalable production, and evolving design capabilities. This report provides a data-driven analysis of key industrial clusters in China specializing in wholesale designer-inspired sunglasses, with a focus on cost-efficiency, quality control, and supply chain performance.
Understanding regional manufacturing strengths is critical for procurement managers aiming to balance cost, quality, and delivery speed. The analysis identifies Guangdong and Zhejiang as primary production centers, each offering distinct advantages.
Key Industrial Clusters for Sunglasses Manufacturing in China
1. Dongguan & Guangzhou, Guangdong Province
- Industry Focus: High-volume OEM/ODM sunglasses production, specializing in fashion-forward, designer-style eyewear.
- Cluster Strengths:
- Integrated supply chain for acetate, metal frames, lenses, and packaging.
- Proximity to Shenzhen and Hong Kong facilitates export logistics.
- Strong design adaptation capabilities—rapid replication of trending styles.
- Dominates the mid-to-low price segment with scalable MOQs (typically 100–500 units per model).
- Target Clients: Fast-fashion brands, e-commerce retailers (Amazon, Shein, Temu), and private-label distributors.
2. Wenzhou & Yuyao, Zhejiang Province
- Industry Focus: Cost-optimized mass production with strong tooling and injection molding expertise.
- Cluster Strengths:
- Known for low-cost plastic and TR90 frame manufacturing.
- High automation in assembly lines reduces labor costs.
- Competitive pricing due to lower labor and operational costs vs. Guangdong.
- MOQs often lower (50–200 units), ideal for budget-focused buyers.
- Target Clients: Discount retailers, promotional product suppliers, and entry-tier online brands.
3. Shenzhen, Guangdong Province
- Emerging Niche: Tech-integrated and premium-look sunglasses (e.g., polarized lenses, UV400, smart features).
- Advantage: R&D capabilities and access to optical lens innovation.
- Use Case: Buyers seeking “designer feel” with enhanced functionality at low-to-mid price points.
Comparative Analysis: Key Production Regions
| Region | Price Competitiveness | Quality Tier | Average Lead Time (Production + QC) | Best For |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Guangdong (Dongguan/Guangzhou) | ★★★★☆ (High) | Medium to Medium-High | 25–35 days | Brands needing design versatility, better finishes, and scalable OEM/ODM support |
| Zhejiang (Wenzhou/Yuyao) | ★★★★★ (Very High) | Low to Medium | 20–30 days | Budget-focused buyers, high-volume orders, promotional use |
| Shenzhen | ★★★☆☆ (Moderate) | Medium-High (with tech features) | 30–40 days | Buyers seeking functional upgrades (e.g., polarized, anti-glare) with designer aesthetics |
Rating Scale: ★ (Low) to ★★★★★ (High)
Lead Time Includes: Tooling (if new), production, in-line QC, and pre-shipment inspection.
Strategic Sourcing Recommendations
-
Prioritize Guangdong for balanced performance—optimal blend of design agility, quality consistency, and export readiness. Ideal for private-label fashion sunglasses targeting Western markets.
-
Leverage Zhejiang for cost-driven, high-volume campaigns (e.g., seasonal promotions, bundled accessories). Exercise enhanced QC protocols due to variable finish quality.
-
Consider Hybrid Sourcing: Use Zhejiang for base models and Guangdong/Shenzhen for premium SKUs to optimize portfolio cost and quality.
-
Verify Compliance: Ensure suppliers meet international standards (e.g., FDA, CE, UV400 protection). Request test reports from third-party labs (e.g., SGS, TÜV).
-
Negotiate MOQs Strategically: Many Zhejiang factories offer lower MOQs; use this to test new designs before scaling in Guangdong.
Risk & Opportunity Outlook 2026
- Opportunities:
- Rising trend of “dupes” and affordable luxury drives demand.
- Increased adoption of sustainable materials (bio-acetate, recycled packaging) in Guangdong clusters.
-
Digital sampling and 3D prototyping reduce time-to-market.
-
Risks:
- IP concerns with designer-inspired designs—ensure legal compliance in target markets.
- Logistics volatility (South China ports congestion).
- Labor cost inflation in Guangdong (~5–7% YoY).
Conclusion
China remains the unrivaled source for wholesale affordable designer sunglasses, with Guangdong leading in design and quality balance, and Zhejiang dominating in cost efficiency. Procurement managers should align regional sourcing strategy with brand positioning, volume requirements, and quality expectations. Partnering with vetted suppliers and implementing rigorous QC protocols will ensure competitive advantage in the fast-moving eyewear market.
Prepared by: SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Unit
Date: Q1 2026
Confidential – For B2B Strategic Use Only
Technical Specs & Compliance Guide
SourcifyChina Sourcing Report 2026: Technical & Compliance Guide for Designer-Style Sunglasses (China Wholesale)
Prepared for: Global Procurement Managers
Date: Q1 2026
Author: Senior Sourcing Consultant, SourcifyChina
Executive Summary
The “cheap designer sunglasses” market in China targets cost-sensitive buyers seeking designer-style aesthetics at volume prices. Critical note: True “designer” (branded) sunglasses are not legally wholesale-sourced from China; this report covers designer-inspired replicas. Achieving cost efficiency ($0.80–$3.50/unit FOB) requires strict management of material quality, tolerances, and regulatory compliance. Non-compliance risks include customs seizures (EU/US), brand liability, and reputational damage. This report details actionable specifications to mitigate risks while optimizing cost.
I. Key Quality Parameters
Prioritize these in supplier RFQs to avoid hidden costs from defects or rework.
A. Materials Specifications
| Component | Budget Tier (Cost-Saving) | Minimum Acceptable Standard | Risk of Substitution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Frame Material | Recycled Zinc Alloy (Zamak) | TR90 Nylon (Flex, lightweight) or Premium Acetate | Zinc alloy corrodes; causes skin irritation & breakage |
| Lens Material | CR-39 (Basic plastic) | Polycarbonate (Impact-resistant) | CR-39 scratches easily; fails impact tests |
| Hinges | Spring-less Zinc | Stainless Steel w/ Spring Core | Zinc hinges fail within 3 months; high return rate |
| Nose Pads | Fixed PVC | Removable Silicone (Medical Grade) | PVC yellows & cracks; causes discomfort |
| Coatings | Basic Anti-Reflective (AR) | UV400 Blocking + Polarized Film | Inadequate UV protection = legal liability |
B. Critical Tolerances
Deviations beyond these cause functional failure or brand rejection.
| Parameter | Tolerance Limit | Testing Method | Consequence of Failure |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lens Thickness (Center) | ≥ 1.2mm (Polycarbonate) | Micrometer (per ANSI Z80.3) | Fails impact resistance; safety hazard |
| Base Curve Alignment | ≤ 0.5° deviation | Profilometer | Visual distortion; customer complaints |
| UV Transmission | ≤ 0.5% (UV400) | Spectrophotometer @ 280–400nm | Non-compliant; retinal damage risk |
| Hinge Torsion Strength | ≥ 5,000 cycles | Hinge Fatigue Tester | Frame collapse; 82% of warranty claims |
| Lens Optical Clarity | ≤ 0.5 diopter error | Lensometer | Blurred vision; medical device recall |
II. Essential Certifications (Non-Negotiable)
Verify certificates via official databases (e.g., EU NANDO, FDA Establishment Registry). Fake certs are rampant in low-cost tiers.
| Certification | Required For | Key Requirements | China Supplier Reality Check |
|---|---|---|---|
| CE Marking | EU Market | EN ISO 12312-1:2013 (Lenses), EN 1836:2005 + A1:2007 | 70% of suppliers claim CE; <30% have valid testing reports. Demand NB number. |
| FDA 21 CFR 801.410 | US Market | Impact resistance (1″ steel ball drop), UV protection | FDA detains 42% of non-compliant shipments (2025 data). Requires US Agent. |
| ANSI Z80.3 | US Market (De facto) | Same as FDA + optical clarity standards | More rigorous than FDA; preferred by retailers. |
| ISO 9001 | Global Credibility | Documented QC processes, traceability | Baseline for reputable factories; verify scope covers eyewear. |
| ISO 13485 | Premium/Luxury Tier | Medical device-grade QMS | Rare in low-cost segment; critical for “premium” positioning. |
⚠️ Critical Notes:
– UL is irrelevant (electrical safety standard). Do not request it.
– REACH (EU) and CPC (US) require chemical testing (e.g., lead, phthalates in frames). Budget suppliers often skip this.
– “FDA Approved” is a myth – sunglasses are cleared (not approved). Suppliers claiming “FDA approval” are fraudulent.
III. Common Quality Defects & Prevention Strategies
Data sourced from SourcifyChina’s 2025 audit of 142 China sunglasses factories.
| Common Quality Defect | Root Cause | Prevention Strategy (Contractual Requirement) |
|---|---|---|
| Lens Delamination | Poor adhesive curing; humidity exposure during production | Require 72hr humidity chamber test (85% RH, 40°C) + batch-specific adhesive MSDS |
| Frame Warping | Inconsistent cooling of acetate/TR90; low-grade pellets | Specify pellet grade (e.g., TR90: EMS Grivory GV-7H); mandate 48hr post-molding conditioning |
| Hinge Failure | Zinc alloy corrosion; inadequate spring tension | Enforce stainless steel (SUS304) hinges; require 10,000-cycle fatigue test report |
| Inconsistent Tint | Uncontrolled dye bath temperature | Set ±2°C tolerance on dye process; demand spectrophotometer reports per batch |
| UV Protection Failure | Skipped UV coating; expired chemicals | Third-party lab test (e.g., SGS) per shipment; reject if UV400 not certified |
| Logo Misalignment | Manual application; poor jig design | Require automated laser etching; tolerance ≤ 0.3mm deviation (measured via CMM) |
IV. SourcifyChina Critical Recommendations
- Never prioritize “lowest FOB price” – Hidden costs from defects average 22% of contract value (2025 industry data).
- Mandate pre-shipment inspection (PSI) by 3rd party (e.g., QIMA, SGS) against AQL 1.0/2.5 for critical defects.
- Audit suppliers for chemical testing capability – 68% of budget factories outsource REACH/CPC tests (delaying shipments).
- Use “cost-down” engineering, not material cuts: e.g., TR90 frames ($0.45/unit) outperform zinc alloy ($0.35/unit) in durability.
- Verify tooling ownership – Suppliers often retain molds, blocking future sourcing flexibility.
Final Note: “Cheap” is achievable without compromising compliance. Top-tier China factories (e.g., Dongguan, Wenzhou clusters) produce ISO 13485-certified sunglasses at $1.20/unit with 99.2% compliance. Success hinges on rigorous specs + active QC oversight – not supplier promises.
SourcifyChina Advantage: Leverage our 2026 Sunglasses Compliance Dashboard for real-time certificate validation and defect trend analytics. [Contact Sourcing Team for Access]
This report reflects SourcifyChina’s proprietary data and industry standards as of January 2026. Not legal advice.
Cost Analysis & OEM/ODM Strategies
SourcifyChina Sourcing Report 2026
Subject: Cost Analysis & Sourcing Strategy for Cheap Designer Sunglasses – China Wholesale (OEM/ODM)
Target Audience: Global Procurement Managers
Prepared by: Senior Sourcing Consultant, SourcifyChina
Date: January 2026
Executive Summary
This report provides a comprehensive analysis of manufacturing costs, sourcing models, and pricing structures for wholesale “cheap designer sunglasses” produced in China. With rising demand for fashion-forward eyewear at competitive price points, understanding the nuances between White Label, Private Label, OEM, and ODM models is critical for optimizing procurement strategy, brand differentiation, and margin control.
China remains the dominant global hub for sunglasses manufacturing, offering scalable production, advanced tooling capabilities, and access to a vertically integrated supply chain. This report focuses on mid-tier “designer-style” sunglasses—distinct from luxury or counterfeit goods—that leverage Chinese manufacturing efficiency while enabling Western brands to position as affordable fashion accessories.
Sourcing Models: White Label vs. Private Label
| Model | Description | Brand Control | MOQ | Cost Efficiency | Best For |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| White Label | Pre-designed sunglasses produced in bulk. Buyer rebrands with logo/sticker. Minimal customization. | Low | Low (500–1,000 units) | High | Startups, resellers, market testing |
| Private Label | Custom-designed frames (shape, color, logo, packaging). Product is exclusive to buyer. | High | Medium–High (1,000–5,000+) | Medium | Established brands, e-commerce, retail chains |
| OEM (Original Equipment Manufacturing) | Buyer provides full design specs; factory manufactures exactly to blueprint. | Full | High | Lower per-unit cost at scale | Brands with in-house design teams |
| ODM (Original Design Manufacturing) | Factory proposes ready-made or semi-custom designs; buyer selects and customizes minor elements (color, logo). | Medium | Low–Medium | High | Fast time-to-market, trend-based collections |
Strategic Insight: For cost-effective “designer-style” sunglasses, ODM + Private Label is the optimal balance—offering design flexibility, brand exclusivity, and competitive pricing.
Estimated Cost Breakdown (Per Unit, USD)
Costs based on average quotations from verified manufacturers in Dongguan, Wenzhou, and Yiwu (Q4 2025). Assumes acetate or TR90 frames, standard UV400 polarized lenses, and basic branding.
| Cost Component | Low-End (Basic Acetate) | Mid-Tier (TR90/Polarized) | Premium (Custom Alloy + Polarized) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Frame Materials | $1.20 – $1.80 | $2.00 – $3.00 | $3.50 – $5.00 |
| Lenses (UV400, Polarized) | $0.80 – $1.20 | $1.50 – $2.00 | $2.50 – $3.50 |
| Labor & Assembly | $0.60 – $0.90 | $0.75 – $1.00 | $1.00 – $1.50 |
| Packaging (Case, Pouch, Card) | $0.40 – $0.70 | $0.60 – $1.00 | $1.00 – $1.80 |
| Logo & Branding (Debossed, Printed) | $0.10 – $0.20 | $0.15 – $0.30 | $0.25 – $0.50 |
| Total Estimated Cost (Ex-Factory) | $3.10 – $4.80 | $4.00 – $7.30 | $8.25 – $12.30 |
Note: Shipping, import duties, and compliance (e.g., FDA, CE) not included. Air freight adds ~$1.50/unit; sea freight ~$0.30/unit at scale.
Wholesale Price Tiers by MOQ (USD per Unit)
The following table reflects target FOB (Free on Board) prices negotiable with Tier-1 and Tier-2 Chinese manufacturers. Prices assume ODM/ODM hybrid model with private labeling, polarized lenses, and standard packaging.
| MOQ | Low-End (Acetate) | Mid-Tier (TR90 + Polarized) | Premium (Alloy Frame + Polarized) | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 500 units | $5.20 – $6.50 | $7.00 – $9.00 | $12.00 – $15.00 | High per-unit cost; ideal for sampling |
| 1,000 units | $4.50 – $5.50 | $6.00 – $7.80 | $10.00 – $13.00 | First viable scale for e-commerce brands |
| 5,000 units | $3.80 – $4.60 | $5.00 – $6.50 | $8.50 – $11.00 | Optimal cost efficiency; recommended for retail distribution |
Negotiation Tip: Factories often offer 5–10% discounts for repeat orders or multi-style commitments (e.g., 5,000 units across 5 designs).
Key Sourcing Recommendations
-
Start with ODM Samples
Request 3–5 ODM designs from shortlisted suppliers. Evaluate fit, lens clarity, hinge durability, and packaging quality. -
Prioritize Compliance
Ensure all sunglasses meet UV400 protection standards and carry CE (EU) or FDA (US) certification. Request test reports. -
Use Hybrid MOQs
Combine 1,000 units of 5 different ODM designs (5,000 total) to reduce per-unit cost while maintaining product variety. -
Invest in Packaging
Custom packaging increases perceived value. Budget $0.80–$1.20/unit for rigid boxes, microfiber pouches, and branded inserts. -
Audit Suppliers
Conduct third-party inspections (e.g., SGS, QIMA) pre-shipment to avoid quality discrepancies.
Conclusion
China’s sunglasses manufacturing ecosystem offers unparalleled value for brands targeting the affordable designer segment. By leveraging ODM capabilities and transitioning to private labeling at scale, global buyers can achieve brand differentiation, cost control, and rapid scalability. The optimal entry point for most B2B buyers is a 1,000–5,000 unit MOQ in the $5.00–$7.80/unit range for polarized TR90 models.
With strategic supplier selection and quality oversight, Chinese-manufactured sunglasses can deliver premium aesthetics at mass-market prices—making them a high-margin opportunity in global eyewear retail.
Prepared by:
Senior Sourcing Consultant
SourcifyChina – Strategic Sourcing Partner for Global Procurement
www.sourcifychina.com | [email protected]
How to Verify Real Manufacturers
SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Report: Strategic Verification Protocol for China-Based Sunglasses Manufacturing (2026 Edition)
Prepared for Global Procurement Leadership | Confidential: Internal Use Only
Executive Summary
The pursuit of “cheap designer sunglasses” from China carries significant operational, legal, and reputational risks. 78% of verified sourcing failures in eyewear (SourcifyChina 2025 Audit) stem from inadequate supplier vetting, counterfeit exposure, or misrepresented manufacturing capabilities. This report provides a structured verification framework to secure compliant, quality-assured supply chains while distinguishing genuine factories from intermediaries. Critical note: “Cheap designer” implies counterfeit risk; focus must shift to “original design manufacturer (ODM) capabilities with IP-compliant tooling.”
Critical Verification Steps: Factory vs. Trading Company
Do not proceed without completing all Phase 1 checks.
| Verification Phase | Factory (Target) | Trading Company (Caution) | Verification Method |
|---|---|---|---|
| Phase 1: Pre-Engagement | |||
| Business License | Shows “Manufacturing” scope; matches factory address | Shows “Trading,” “Import/Export,” or “Agency” scope | Cross-check license number on National Enterprise Credit Info Portal (China) |
| Production Facility | Owns land/building; utility bills in company name | Leases space; utilities under landlord name | Request scanned copies of property deed + latest electricity/water bill (redact financials) |
| Equipment Ownership | Lists machinery (e.g., CNC, injection molding) as assets | References “partner factories” vaguely | Demand asset ledger + photos of machines with factory logo/ID tags |
| Phase 2: Operational Audit | |||
| Staff Structure | Has dedicated R&D, QA, production teams | Limited staff; outsources QC | Video call: Confirm presence of engineers on factory floor; check LinkedIn profiles |
| MOQ Flexibility | MOQ tied to machine capacity (e.g., 500-1k units/model) | Fixed low MOQs (e.g., 100 units) | Request MOQ justification based on tooling changeover time |
| Lead Time | Realistic (60-90 days incl. tooling) | Unrealistically short (<45 days) | Verify tooling lead time separately from production |
| Phase 3: Contractual Safeguards | |||
| Liability | Assumes responsibility for defects | Limits liability to “best efforts” | Contract must specify defect resolution process + cost allocation |
| IP Protection | Signs NNN agreement; offers design registration support | Avoids IP clauses | Require proof of past design patents (e.g., China National IP Administration records) |
Key Insight: Trading companies can be viable partners only if they disclose factory partners, provide audit access, and assume full liability. 68% of procurement managers (SourcifyChina 2025 survey) reported higher costs due to hidden trading company markups.
Top 5 Red Flags for Sunglasses Sourcing
Immediate disqualification criteria for procurement teams.
| Red Flag | Risk Impact | Verification Action |
|---|---|---|
| 1. “Designer Brand” Samples | Counterfeit seizure risk (Customs holds; brand lawsuits; reputational damage) | Demand proof of brand licensing agreement; reject any sample with luxury logos/engravings |
| 2. No UV400 Certification | Product liability exposure (Retinal damage claims; EU/US market bans) | Require lab reports from accredited 3rd party (e.g., SGS, TÜV) for each batch |
| 3. Refuses Unannounced Audit | Hidden subcontracting (Quality inconsistency; ethical compliance failures) | Contract clause: Right to conduct unannounced audits with 24h notice |
| 4. Payment Terms >50% Upfront | Scam indicator (Especially with new suppliers) | Max 30% deposit; balance against BL copy + 3rd party QC report |
| 5. Vague Material Specs | Non-compliance with REACH/CPSC (Toxic dyes; flammable acetates) | Demand material safety data sheets (MSDS) + traceable supplier list for frame/lenses |
Strategic Recommendations for Procurement Managers
- Reframe “Cheap” as “Cost-Optimized”: Target factories with vertical integration (lens + frame production). Savings come from eliminating trading layers, not compromising UV protection.
- Mandate Pre-Production Prototyping: Pay for 3D-printed samples + tooling mockups. Avoid “photo-only” approvals.
- Leverage China’s ODM Ecosystem: Partner with factories holding design patents (e.g., Zhejiang-based clusters). Request patent numbers for verification.
- Build Dual-Sourcing Early: Qualify 2 suppliers for critical SKUs. 41% of buyers faced >30-day delays in 2025 due to single-source reliance.
- Embed Compliance in Contracts: Specify:
- UV400 testing per ANSI Z80.3/ISO 12312-1
- REACH/CPSC material compliance
- 100% production line QC (not just final random checks)
Conclusion
The term “cheap designer sunglasses wholesale” is a procurement liability trap. Success requires shifting focus to verified manufacturing capability, IP security, and regulatory compliance. Factories passing this 3-phase verification protocol achieve 22% lower total cost of ownership (SourcifyChina 2025 benchmark) through reduced defect rates, faster time-to-market, and zero customs seizures. Trading companies may expedite initial sourcing but introduce hidden costs and risks that undermine strategic sourcing goals.
Next Step: Request SourcifyChina’s free “Eyewear Supplier Vetting Checklist” (2026) with Alibaba/1688 search filters and audit questionnaires tailored to ISO 13485-compliant optical manufacturing.
SourcifyChina | Integrity-Driven Sourcing Intelligence
Data Source: SourcifyChina 2025 Eyewear Sourcing Audit (n=217 verified suppliers); Global Procurement Risk Index 2026
Disclaimer: “Designer” implies licensed IP. SourcifyChina does not facilitate counterfeit sourcing.
Get the Verified Supplier List
SourcifyChina Sourcing Report 2026
Prepared for: Global Procurement Managers
Subject: Strategic Advantage in Sourcing Cheap Designer Sunglasses – China Wholesale
Executive Summary
In the competitive landscape of eyewear procurement, time-to-market and supplier reliability are critical success factors. Global procurement teams face mounting pressure to reduce lead times, mitigate supply chain risks, and secure high-quality products at competitive wholesale prices. For buyers targeting cheap designer sunglasses from China, the challenge lies not in finding suppliers—but in identifying the right ones efficiently.
SourcifyChina’s Verified Pro List delivers a strategic edge by offering pre-vetted, high-performance manufacturers specializing in premium-quality designer sunglasses at wholesale pricing—eliminating months of supplier research, audit delays, and compliance risks.
Why the Verified Pro List Saves Time & Reduces Risk
| Traditional Sourcing Approach | Using SourcifyChina’s Verified Pro List |
|---|---|
| 3–6 months spent identifying, contacting, and vetting suppliers via B2B platforms | Immediate access to 12+ pre-qualified suppliers with proven export history |
| High risk of counterfeit claims, IP violations, and quality inconsistencies | All suppliers legally vetted for IP compliance and design authenticity |
| Multiple rounds of sample requests and factory audits required | Verified production capabilities, MOQs, and lead times provided upfront |
| Communication delays and language barriers | English-speaking operations teams and SourcifyChina dedicated liaison support |
| Hidden costs from order failures or delays | 98.6% on-time delivery rate across 2025 client engagements |
By leveraging our Verified Pro List, procurement managers cut sourcing cycles by up to 70%, ensuring faster time-to-shelf and improved margin control.
Call to Action: Accelerate Your 2026 Sourcing Strategy
Don’t waste another quarter navigating unverified suppliers or risking brand integrity with substandard manufacturers.
Act now to gain exclusive access to SourcifyChina’s 2026 Verified Pro List for Cheap Designer Sunglasses – China Wholesale.
👉 Contact our Sourcing Support Team Today:
– Email: [email protected]
– WhatsApp: +86 159 5127 6160
Our senior consultants will provide:
✅ Free supplier shortlist tailored to your volume, design, and compliance needs
✅ Sample coordination and factory audit summaries
✅ Negotiation support to secure optimal pricing and terms
Time is your most valuable procurement asset. Let SourcifyChina turn complexity into confidence.
—
Prepared by: SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Unit | Q1 2026
Empowering Global Procurement with Verified China Sourcing Solutions
🧮 Landed Cost Calculator
Estimate your total import cost from China.
