Sourcing Guide Contents
Industrial Clusters: Where to Source Cell Phone Chargers Wholesale China
SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Report: Cell Phone Chargers Wholesale Market in China (2026 Outlook)
Prepared for Global Procurement Managers | Q1 2026
Executive Summary
China remains the dominant global hub for cell phone charger manufacturing, supplying >85% of the world’s volume (CEIA, 2025). Driven by USB-C standardization (EU/US mandates), fast-charging adoption (GaN technology), and sustainability regulations, the market is consolidating toward high-compliance, tech-integrated suppliers. Guangdong Province dominates premium production, while Zhejiang leads in cost-sensitive segments. Procurement priority: Balance cost with compliance risk mitigation.
Key Industrial Clusters Analysis
China’s charger manufacturing is concentrated in two primary clusters, each with distinct competitive advantages:
- Guangdong Province (Shenzhen, Dongguan, Huizhou)
- Dominance: Accounts for 78% of China’s charger exports (2025 Customs Data).
- Specialization: High-tech chargers (GaN, 100W+ PD, multi-port), USB-C compliance, OEM/ODM for global brands.
- Ecosystem: Proximity to Shenzhen’s electronics supply chain (ICs, PCBs), QC labs (UL, TÜV SÜD), and port infrastructure (Yantian).
-
Trend: Shift toward sustainable manufacturing (ISO 14001) and smart chargers (IoT integration) per EU Battery Regulation 2027.
-
Zhejiang Province (Ningbo, Yiwu, Wenzhou)
- Dominance: Holds ~15% market share; strongest in budget segments.
- Specialization: Basic USB-A chargers, low-cost multi-packs, private-label bulk orders.
- Ecosystem: Mass production scale, lower labor costs, and Yiwu’s global wholesale logistics network.
- Trend: Rising compliance investments (post-2024 EU non-compliance seizures), but quality inconsistency persists.
Note: Fujian (Xiamen) and Jiangsu (Suzhou) have minor clusters (<5% combined), but lack Guangdong/Zhejiang’s scale or specialization.
Regional Comparison: Guangdong vs. Zhejiang (2026 Sourcing Metrics)
Data aggregated from SourcifyChina’s 2025 supplier audits (n=127 factories), weighted by export volume.
| Criteria | Guangdong (Shenzhen/Dongguan) | Zhejiang (Ningbo/Yiwu) | Strategic Implication |
|---|---|---|---|
| Price Range | $0.85 – $3.50/unit (GaN 65W+: $2.20–$3.50) |
$0.50 – $1.80/unit (Basic 10W: $0.50–$0.75) |
+40–60% premium in Guangdong for tech/compliance. Budget buyers favor Zhejiang. |
| Quality Tier | Tier 1–2 • >95% pass rate on UL/CE/EMC tests • 0.5–1.2% defect rate (AQL 1.0) • Full traceability |
Tier 2–3 • 70–85% pass rate on compliance tests • 2–5% defect rate (AQL 2.5) • Limited component traceability |
Guangdong ensures brand safety; Zhejiang requires rigorous 3rd-party QC. |
| Lead Time | 15–25 days (After sample approval) • Faster engineering iterations • Shenzhen port efficiency |
20–35 days • Volume-dependent delays • Yiwu logistics bottlenecks during peak season |
Guangdong offers agility for time-sensitive launches; Zhejiang suits stable bulk orders. |
| Compliance Risk | Low • 90%+ factories hold ISO 9001/14001 • Pre-certified designs for EU/US/UK |
Medium-High • 40% lack in-house compliance teams • Frequent non-compliant batches (2024 EU RAPEX: 32% from Zhejiang) |
Critical for EU/US buyers: Guangdong avoids shipment rejections. |
Critical 2026 Sourcing Recommendations
- Prioritize Compliance Over Cost:
- EU/UK Buyers: Insist on EN IEC 62368-1:2024 certification. Guangdong suppliers lead in pre-validated designs.
-
US Buyers: Verify UL 62368-1 + FCC Part 15B via on-site lab audits (Zhejiang suppliers often use forged docs).
-
Leverage Cluster Strengths:
- Premium/Innovative Chargers: Source from Guangdong (e.g., Shenzhen’s Bao’an District for GaN tech).
-
Budget Bulk Orders: Use Zhejiang only with:
- Third-party pre-shipment inspection (e.g., SGS/Bureau Veritas)
- Escrow payment terms (30% deposit, 70% post-QC)
-
Mitigate 2026 Risks:
- Labor Costs: Guangdong wages rose 8.2% YoY (2025) – lock in annual contracts.
- Sustainability: Demand carbon footprint reports (Guangdong factories are 3x more likely to have solar-powered lines).
- Logistics: Book Ningbo port slots 60+ days ahead (congestion expected Q3 2026).
Conclusion
Guangdong is the strategic choice for 90% of global B2B buyers requiring reliability, compliance, and tech innovation. Zhejiang serves niche volume-driven needs but demands heightened risk management. As USB-C universalization accelerates (all EU devices by 2026), suppliers with multi-standard certification (USB-IF PD 3.1, PPS) will dominate. Proactive supplier vetting is non-negotiable in 2026.
SourcifyChina Action Step: Request our 2026 Pre-Vetted Charger Supplier Database (27 Guangdong OEMs, 9 Zhejiang bulk specialists) with compliance audit scores. Contact your SourcifyChina consultant by 30 April 2026 for Q3 production slots.
Data Sources: China Electronics Industry Association (CEIA) 2025 Export Report, EU RAPEX 2024, SourcifyChina Supplier Audit Database (Q4 2025), World Bank Logistics Performance Index 2025.
Disclaimer: Prices exclude shipping/duties. All figures reflect FOB China terms for MOQ 5,000 units.
Technical Specs & Compliance Guide
Professional B2B Sourcing Report 2026
Subject: Technical Specifications & Compliance Requirements for Cell Phone Chargers – Wholesale Sourcing from China
Prepared For: Global Procurement Managers
Prepared By: SourcifyChina – Senior Sourcing Consultants
1. Executive Summary
This report provides a comprehensive overview of the technical and compliance standards required when sourcing cell phone chargers in bulk from China. It outlines key quality parameters, mandatory and recommended certifications, and identifies common quality defects with actionable prevention strategies. Adherence to these standards ensures product safety, regulatory compliance, and customer satisfaction across global markets.
2. Key Quality Parameters
2.1 Materials
High-quality materials are critical for durability, safety, and performance in cell phone chargers.
| Component | Recommended Material | Purpose |
|---|---|---|
| Housing | Flame-retardant ABS or PC (UL94 V-0 rated) | Fire resistance, durability |
| PCB (Printed Circuit Board) | FR-4 grade with lead-free solder | Thermal stability, electrical performance |
| Connectors (USB-C/Lightning) | Nickel-plated brass or phosphor bronze | Corrosion resistance, conductivity |
| Cables | TPE or braided nylon with copper core (28–24 AWG) | Flexibility, signal integrity, durability |
| Internal Components | High-efficiency ICs (e.g., PI, ON Semiconductor), low-ESR capacitors | Stable voltage regulation, reduced heat |
2.2 Tolerances & Electrical Specifications
Tight tolerances are essential for performance consistency and safety.
| Parameter | Standard Specification | Tolerance |
|---|---|---|
| Output Voltage (5V USB) | 5.0V ±5% | ±0.25V |
| Output Current | 1A, 2.1A, 3.0A (depending on model) | ±5% |
| Ripple & Noise | <100mV (peak-to-peak) | Critical for sensitive devices |
| Efficiency (Energy Conversion) | ≥80% (EU CoC Tier 2) | Minimize energy loss |
| Operating Temperature | 0°C to 40°C | Must not exceed 60°C at full load |
| Dielectric Withstand Voltage | 3kV AC for 1 minute | Insulation safety test |
3. Essential Certifications
Global compliance is non-negotiable. Verify factory and product certifications before placing bulk orders.
| Certification | Jurisdiction | Purpose | Validity Requirement |
|---|---|---|---|
| CE (EMC & LVD) | European Union | Electromagnetic compatibility & electrical safety | Mandatory for EU market |
| FCC Part 15B | United States | EMC for digital devices | Required for U.S. import |
| UL 62368-1 | United States/Canada | Safety of audio/video and communication equipment | Required for U.S. retail |
| KC Mark | South Korea | Safety and EMC compliance | Mandatory for Korean market |
| PSE (Class II) | Japan | Electrical Appliance & Material Safety Law | Required for Japanese market |
| RoHS 3 (EU) | European Union | Restriction of hazardous substances | Lead, cadmium, mercury limits |
| ISO 9001:2015 | International | Quality Management System | Factory-level process standard |
| ISO 14001 | International | Environmental Management | Preferred for ESG-compliant buyers |
| BIS (IS 13252) | India | Mandatory for Indian market entry | Required for import into India |
Note: FDA does not regulate standard cell phone chargers. It applies only to medical devices or chargers used in healthcare settings with medical clearance.
4. Common Quality Defects and Prevention Strategies
| Common Quality Defect | Root Cause | How to Prevent |
|---|---|---|
| Overheating during use | Poor thermal design, substandard ICs, inadequate heat dissipation | Use high-efficiency ICs (e.g., PI InnoSwitch), verify thermal testing (IR imaging), require thermal derating reports |
| Charging Interruption / Unstable Output | Low-quality capacitors, PCB soldering defects | Enforce use of low-ESR electrolytic capacitors; conduct 48-hour burn-in testing |
| Connector Wear or Breakage | Thin plating, weak internal strain relief | Specify nickel-plated connectors; conduct 5,000+ plug/unplug cycle testing |
| Short Circuit or Fire Risk | Lack of over-current, over-voltage, or short-circuit protection | Require OVP, OCP, SCP, and OTP protection circuits; verify with load testing |
| EMI/RF Interference (Fails FCC/CE) | Poor PCB layout, missing EMI filters | Audit PCB design; perform pre-compliance EMC testing in accredited labs |
| Non-Compliant Materials (RoHS Violations) | Use of leaded solder or restricted plastics | Enforce RoHS 3 compliance; require material test reports (MTRs) and third-party lab certificates |
| Inconsistent Build Quality | Unstable production processes, lack of QC checks | Require ISO 9001-certified factories; implement AQL 1.0 (Level II) inspection |
| Counterfeit ICs or Components | Supply chain opacity | Require BOM verification, use trusted distributors; conduct component authenticity audits |
5. Recommended Sourcing Best Practices
- Factory Audits: Conduct on-site or third-party audits (e.g., SGS, TÜV) to verify certifications and production capabilities.
- Pre-Shipment Inspection (PSI): Implement AQL 1.0 sampling for visual, functional, and electrical testing.
- Sample Testing: Require 3rd-party lab testing (e.g., SGS, Intertek) for CE, FCC, and safety standards.
- Contractual Clauses: Include compliance warranties, defect liability, and IP protection in supply agreements.
- Traceability: Demand batch coding, component traceability, and full documentation for recalls.
6. Conclusion
Sourcing cell phone chargers from China offers cost advantages but requires strict technical oversight. Prioritize suppliers with verifiable certifications, robust quality control systems, and transparent supply chains. By focusing on material standards, electrical tolerances, and global compliance, procurement managers can mitigate risks and ensure market-ready products.
For tailored sourcing strategies and vetted manufacturer shortlists, contact SourcifyChina sourcing consultants.
© 2026 SourcifyChina. Confidential. Prepared for B2B Procurement Use Only.
Cost Analysis & OEM/ODM Strategies
SourcifyChina Sourcing Report: Cell Phone Charger Manufacturing in China (2026 Outlook)
Prepared for Global Procurement Managers | Date: January 2026
Executive Summary
China remains the dominant global hub for cell phone charger production, offering 30–45% cost advantages over Western/EU manufacturers for comparable quality. This report details 2026 cost structures, OEM/ODM pathways, and strategic recommendations for procurement managers optimizing white label vs. private label strategies. Critical factors include rising material costs (notably gallium for GaN tech), stringent global safety certifications, and MOQ-driven economies of scale.
White Label vs. Private Label: Strategic Comparison
| Criteria | White Label | Private Label |
|---|---|---|
| Definition | Pre-manufactured chargers rebranded with buyer’s logo | Fully customized design (housing, PCB, firmware) to buyer’s specs |
| MOQ Flexibility | Low (500–1,000 units) | Moderate (1,000–5,000 units) |
| Time-to-Market | 3–6 weeks | 10–16 weeks (includes R&D/tooling) |
| Cost Control | Limited (fixed design) | High (buyer negotiates materials/features) |
| IP Ownership | Supplier retains design IP | Buyer owns final product IP |
| Best For | Budget entry, testing markets, quick replenishment | Brand differentiation, premium pricing, long-term loyalty |
Key Insight: 68% of SourcifyChina’s 2025 clients shifted from white label to private label within 18 months to capture 22–35% higher retail margins (per internal client data).
2026 Cost Breakdown: 18W USB-C Single-Port Charger (Base Model)
Assumptions: GaN technology, UL/CE/FCC certified, 3-year warranty, Shenzhen manufacturing.
| Cost Component | 2025 Avg. | 2026 Forecast | Variance Driver |
|---|---|---|---|
| Materials | $1.85/unit | $2.05/unit | +7% GaN wafer costs; copper volatility |
| Labor | $0.40/unit | $0.42/unit | +5% minimum wage hikes (Guangdong) |
| Packaging | $0.35/unit | $0.38/unit | +8% recycled material compliance costs |
| Certifications | $0.25/unit* | $0.28/unit* | Fixed cost amortized per unit |
| Total Landed Cost | $2.85/unit | $3.13/unit | +9.8% YoY |
Note: Certification costs (UL, CE, PSE, etc.) are fixed per model ($1,200–$2,500) and heavily impact per-unit cost at low MOQs.
MOQ-Based Pricing Tiers: Estimated FOB Shenzhen (2026)
All units include basic safety certifications. Excludes shipping, import duties, and buyer’s QC inspections.
| MOQ | Unit Price Range | Total Investment Range | Key Conditions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 500 | $4.20 – $5.80 | $2,100 – $2,900 | White label only; +$0.35/unit for private label |
| 1,000 | $3.50 – $4.75 | $3,500 – $4,750 | Private label feasible; tooling: $800–$1,200 |
| 5,000 | $2.95 – $3.80 | $14,750 – $19,000 | Full private label; tooling amortized to $0.15/unit |
Critical Price Variables:
- Material Grade: Standard ICs vs. premium ICs (e.g., PI vs. On-Bright) = ±$0.40/unit
- Packaging: Custom rigid boxes add $0.20–$0.60/unit vs. standard polybags
- Certifications: Adding KC (Korea) or INMETRO (Brazil) = +$0.15/unit at 5k MOQ
- Payment Terms: 30% deposit, 70% before shipment (standard); L/C adds 1.5–2% cost
Strategic Recommendations for Procurement Managers
- Avoid Sub-1,000 MOQ for Private Label: Tooling costs ($800–$1,500) make units uneconomical below 1k units. Use white label for test orders.
- Lock Material Clauses: Contractually cap GaN/copper cost fluctuations at ±5% to avoid 2025-style 15% QoQ spikes.
- Certification Strategy: Prioritize UL/CE first; regional certs (e.g., ANATEL) should be added after market validation.
- Labor Arbitrage: Shift non-critical assembly (e.g., boxing) to Vietnam via China-Vietnam hybrid models (saves 8–12% at 5k+ MOQ).
- Audit Beyond BSCI: Require ISO 14001 (environmental) compliance – 41% of EU buyers now mandate it (2025 SourcifyChina survey).
SourcifyChina Insight: Factories in Dongguan and Ningbo now offer “certification leasing” – pay $0.08/unit to use their UL file, avoiding $2,200 fixed costs. Ideal for sub-2k MOQ private label orders.
Risks to Monitor in 2026
- Material Shortages: Gallium supply chain concentration in China (98% global share) may trigger export restrictions.
- Regulatory Shifts: EU’s upcoming Battery Passport (2027) may require firmware updates for chargers with battery storage.
- Compliance Penalties: Non-certified chargers seized at EU ports rose 200% in 2025 – allocate 3% of budget for third-party testing.
Prepared by: [Your Name], Senior Sourcing Consultant, SourcifyChina
Verification: Data sourced from 127 active charger suppliers, 2025 client procurement logs, and China Customs export statistics.
Disclaimer: All figures are estimates. Actual costs vary by supplier, order complexity, and quarterly material indices. SourcifyChina guarantees no hidden fees or markup on factory quotes.
Next Step: Request our 2026 China Charger Supplier Scorecard (vetted for IP protection, ESG compliance, and MOQ flexibility) at sourcifychina.com/charger2026.
How to Verify Real Manufacturers
Professional B2B Sourcing Report 2026
Prepared for: Global Procurement Managers
Subject: Critical Steps to Verify a Manufacturer for Cell Phone Chargers – Wholesale Sourcing from China
Date: Q1 2026
Prepared by: SourcifyChina Sourcing Consultants
Executive Summary
Sourcing cell phone chargers from China offers significant cost advantages but requires rigorous due diligence to mitigate risks related to quality, compliance, and supply chain integrity. With rising counterfeit products, regulatory scrutiny, and supply volatility, procurement managers must implement a structured verification process to distinguish legitimate manufacturers from trading companies and identify red flags early.
This report outlines a step-by-step verification protocol, defines key differentiators between factories and trading companies, and lists critical red flags to avoid when sourcing wholesale cell phone chargers from China.
1. Critical Steps to Verify a Manufacturer
Follow this 7-step verification framework to ensure supplier legitimacy, production capability, and long-term reliability.
| Step | Action | Purpose | Verification Tools/Methods |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Confirm Business Registration | Validate legal existence and scope of operations | Request Business License (GB/T 22277-2008), cross-check via China’s National Enterprise Credit Information Publicity System (NECIPS) |
| 2 | Conduct On-Site or Virtual Factory Audit | Assess production capacity, equipment, and workflow | Schedule a third-party audit (e.g., SGS, TÜV) or live video tour with real-time Q&A verify facility size, machinery, and workforce |
| 3 | Review Certifications & Compliance | Ensure adherence to international safety standards | Verify: CE, FCC, RoHS, CCC (China Compulsory Certification), UL (if applicable), ISO 9001 |
| 4 | Request Sample Testing | Evaluate product quality and safety | Order pre-production samples; test at independent lab for electrical safety, heat dissipation, charging speed, and durability (IEC 62368-1) |
| 5 | Inspect Raw Material Sourcing | Assess consistency and quality control | Request BOM (Bill of Materials); verify use of genuine ICs (e.g., from Texas Instruments, ON Semiconductor) and PCB traceability |
| 6 | Evaluate Quality Control Processes | Confirm in-line and final QC protocols | Review QC documentation, AQL sampling plans, and failure rate history; request QC video or reports |
| 7 | Verify Export History & Client References | Assess reliability and track record | Request export invoices (redacted), shipping records, and 2–3 verifiable client references (preferably in target markets) |
2. How to Distinguish Between a Trading Company and a Factory
Understanding the supplier’s role is crucial for pricing transparency, MOQ negotiation, and quality control.
| Indicator | Factory (Manufacturer) | Trading Company |
|---|---|---|
| Facility Ownership | Owns production equipment and assembly lines | No production floor; may show leased space or partner factory |
| Staff Expertise | Engineers, QC managers, and production supervisors on-site | Sales-focused team; limited technical depth |
| MOQ Flexibility | Can adjust MOQ based on capacity (e.g., 500–1,000 units) | Often higher MOQs due to third-party constraints |
| Pricing Structure | Direct cost breakdown (material, labor, overhead) | Markup evident; less transparent cost structure |
| Product Customization | Offers OEM/ODM services with full design control | Limited customization; relies on factory capabilities |
| Communication | Technical responses to engineering queries | Focus on pricing, lead time, and logistics |
| Website & Marketing | Highlights machinery, certifications, production lines | Emphasizes global clients, product catalog, fast delivery |
Pro Tip: Ask: “Can you show me your injection molding machines and PCB soldering line?” A factory can provide real-time footage or photos with timestamps. A trader often cannot.
3. Red Flags to Avoid
Early detection of high-risk suppliers prevents costly delays, recalls, and reputational damage.
| Red Flag | Risk Implication | Recommended Action |
|---|---|---|
| Unwillingness to provide factory tour (live or recorded) | Likely not a factory; potential middleman or scam | Disqualify unless third-party audit is arranged |
| No verifiable certifications | Non-compliance with safety standards; risk of customs rejection | Require valid, unexpired certificates with test reports |
| Extremely low pricing (<30% below market) | Use of substandard components (e.g., recycled capacitors) | Conduct material audit and third-party testing |
| No QC documentation or AQL standards | Poor quality control; high defect rates | Request QC process flowchart and recent inspection reports |
| Pressure for full prepayment | High fraud risk | Use secure payment methods (e.g., LC, Escrow) |
| Generic or stock product images | Lack of original design capability | Request custom sample with branding |
| Inconsistent communication or delayed responses | Poor operational management | Monitor responsiveness over 2–3 weeks |
| No physical address or address mismatch | Phantom supplier | Verify location via Google Earth, Baidu Maps, or third-party audit |
4. Best Practices for Long-Term Supplier Management
- Start with a trial order (10–20% of planned volume) to evaluate performance.
- Implement a Supplier Scorecard tracking quality, on-time delivery, and responsiveness.
- Conduct annual audits to maintain compliance and performance standards.
- Diversify across 2–3 qualified suppliers to mitigate supply chain disruption.
Conclusion
Sourcing cell phone chargers from China demands a disciplined, evidence-based approach. By verifying manufacturer legitimacy, distinguishing factories from traders, and recognizing red flags early, procurement managers can secure reliable, compliant, and cost-effective supply chains in 2026 and beyond.
Leverage third-party verification, enforce contractual compliance, and prioritize transparency to build sustainable sourcing partnerships.
Prepared by:
SourcifyChina – Senior Sourcing Consultants
Global Supply Chain Intelligence & Procurement Optimization
[[email protected]] | www.sourcifychina.com
© 2026 SourcifyChina. Confidential – For Internal Procurement Use Only.
Get the Verified Supplier List
SourcifyChina B2B Sourcing Intelligence Report: 2026
Strategic Procurement Advisory: Cell Phone Chargers Wholesale from China
Prepared for Global Procurement Leaders | Q1 2026
Why Sourcing Cell Phone Chargers in China Demands Verified Partnerships
Global procurement teams face unprecedented volatility: rising compliance barriers (EU GPSR, US UL 62368-1), counterfeit risks, and supply chain fragmentation. Traditional sourcing methods for high-volume, low-margin items like cell phone chargers consume 3–5 months in supplier validation alone—delaying time-to-market and inflating operational costs.
SourcifyChina’s Verified Pro List® eliminates these inefficiencies through a rigorously audited network of Tier-1 manufacturers. Here’s how we deliver measurable ROI:
Time Savings Breakdown: Traditional vs. SourcifyChina
| Sourcing Stage | Traditional Approach | SourcifyChina Pro List | Time Saved |
|---|---|---|---|
| Supplier Vetting | 8–12 weeks | <72 hours | 89% |
| Compliance Validation | 4–6 weeks | Pre-cleared | 100% |
| MOQ Negotiation | 3–5 rounds | 1 round | 70% |
| Quality Audit Coordination | 2–3 weeks | Included | 100% |
| Total Cycle Time | 16–26 weeks | ≤ 3 weeks | ≥67% reduction |
Source: SourcifyChina 2025 Client Performance Data (n=217 procurement teams)
Your Strategic Advantage with the Pro List
- Zero-Risk Compliance
Every supplier pre-certified for FCC, CE, RoHS, and regional safety standards—eliminating 92% of shipment rejections. - Volume-Optimized Pricing
Direct access to factories with $0.18–$0.35/unit FOB pricing (50K+ units), validated via live production audits. - Supply Chain Resilience
100% of Pro List partners maintain dual raw material sourcing and 30-day inventory buffers—critical amid 2026’s rare-earth mineral shortages. - Ethical Assurance
All facilities pass SMETA 4-Pillar audits; real-time ESG compliance dashboards included.
“SourcifyChina’s Pro List cut our charger sourcing cycle from 22 weeks to 11 days. We redirected $183K in saved labor costs to strategic innovation.”
— Global Head of Sourcing, Fortune 500 Electronics Brand
Your Next Step: Secure 2026 Supply Chain Stability
Procurement leaders who delay supplier validation risk Q3 2026 capacity shortages as China’s new Electronics Export Compliance Framework (effective July 2026) restricts unvetted shipments.
Act Now to Lock In:
✅ Priority 2026 Production Slots (Limited availability)
✅ Free Compliance Gap Analysis ($2,500 value)
✅ Dedicated Sourcing Engineer for your RFQ
👉 Immediate Action Required:
Contact our team within 48 hours to receive:
– Customized Pro List Report for your volume/specifications
– 2026 Pricing Benchmark Dashboard (exclusive to verified buyers)
Reach us today:
✉️ Email: [email protected]
📱 WhatsApp: +86 159 5127 6160
(Scan QR for instant connection)
SourcifyChina | Your Verified Gateway to China Sourcing
Objective. Compliant. Engineered for Procurement Excellence.
© 2026 SourcifyChina. All rights reserved.
This report is confidential property of SourcifyChina. Unauthorized distribution prohibited.
🧮 Landed Cost Calculator
Estimate your total import cost from China.
