Sourcing Guide Contents
Industrial Clusters: Where to Source C&D China Company
Professional B2B Sourcing Report 2026
Prepared for: Global Procurement Managers
Subject: Deep-Dive Market Analysis – Sourcing “C&D China Company” from China
Date: April 2026
Author: SourcifyChina | Senior Sourcing Consultant
Executive Summary
This report provides a strategic market analysis for global procurement professionals seeking to source products associated with “C&D China Company” from manufacturing hubs in China. While “C&D China Company” does not refer to a standardized product category, based on industry context and common procurement terminology, this report interprets the term as a placeholder for consumer electronics and digital (C&D) hardware products, including smart devices, consumer IoT, audio-visual equipment, and related electronic components—commonly sourced under OEM/ODM arrangements from Chinese manufacturers.
The analysis identifies key industrial clusters in China specializing in this product segment and evaluates core sourcing regions based on price competitiveness, quality standards, and lead time efficiency. The findings aim to support strategic supplier selection, risk mitigation, and supply chain optimization for multinational procurement teams.
Key Industrial Clusters for C&D Electronics Manufacturing in China
China remains the world’s largest producer of consumer electronics, hosting vertically integrated supply chains across several specialized industrial clusters. The primary manufacturing hubs for C&D electronics are concentrated in the Pearl River Delta (PRD) and Yangtze River Delta (YRD), with emerging capacity in Central and Western regions.
Top 5 Industrial Clusters for C&D Electronics:
| Province | Key City(s) | Specialization | Notable Features |
|---|---|---|---|
| Guangdong | Shenzhen, Dongguan, Guangzhou | Smart devices, PCBs, IoT, audio equipment | High-tech ecosystem; proximity to Hong Kong; strong ODM base |
| Zhejiang | Hangzhou, Ningbo, Yuyao | Consumer electronics, smart home devices, connectors | Strong SME network; agile manufacturing; e-commerce integration |
| Jiangsu | Suzhou, Wuxi, Nanjing | Precision components, semiconductors, displays | Proximity to Shanghai; foreign-invested factories; high automation |
| Fujian | Xiamen, Fuzhou | Audio-visual equipment, power adapters | Focused on export-oriented electronics; lower labor costs |
| Sichuan | Chengdu, Chongqing | Assembly, emerging smart device hubs | Inland logistics hub; government incentives; rising labor costs |
Note: Shenzhen (Guangdong) is the epicenter of China’s consumer electronics ecosystem, hosting over 60% of the country’s ODMs for smart devices and IoT hardware.
Comparative Analysis: Key Production Regions for C&D Electronics
The following table compares the two most dominant sourcing regions—Guangdong and Zhejiang—based on critical procurement KPIs: Price, Quality, and Lead Time. These regions are benchmarked against each other to guide strategic sourcing decisions.
| Criteria | Guangdong (Shenzhen/Dongguan) | Zhejiang (Hangzhou/Yuyao) | Analysis & Recommendation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Price | ⭐⭐⭐☆ (Medium-High) | ⭐⭐⭐⭐ (Competitive) | Zhejiang offers lower unit costs due to competitive SME pricing and lower overheads. Guangdong’s costs are elevated due to higher labor and real estate, but justified by superior ecosystem. |
| Quality | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ (High) | ⭐⭐⭐⭐ (Medium-High) | Guangdong leads in quality consistency, with ISO-certified factories, rigorous QC protocols, and experience with global brands (e.g., Apple, Xiaomi, DJI). Zhejiang quality is improving but varies across SMEs. |
| Lead Time | ⭐⭐⭐⭐ (Fast) | ⭐⭐⭐☆ (Moderate) | Guangdong’s integrated supply chain enables faster prototyping and production (avg. 25–35 days). Zhejiang has slightly longer lead times (30–45 days) due to fragmented component sourcing. |
| Supply Chain Maturity | Industry-leading; full vertical integration | Moderate; relies on external component sourcing | Guangdong offers just-in-time access to PCBs, molds, and ICs. Zhejiang requires more coordination. |
| ODM/Innovation Capacity | High (R&D hubs, tech incubators) | Medium (growing with Alibaba ecosystem) | Ideal for complex or innovative designs. |
| Logistics & Export Readiness | Excellent (proximity to Shekou & HK ports) | Good (Ningbo port access) | Faster customs clearance and sea freight from PRD. |
Strategic Sourcing Recommendations
-
For Premium Quality & Speed:
Source from Guangdong, particularly Shenzhen and Dongguan. Ideal for high-volume, high-complexity, or regulated products requiring certifications (e.g., CE, FCC, RoHS). -
For Cost-Sensitive, Mid-Tier Volumes:
Consider Zhejiang, especially for consumer IoT, accessories, or smart home devices. Conduct rigorous supplier audits to ensure quality consistency. -
Dual-Sourcing Strategy:
Leverage Guangdong for primary production and Zhejiang as a backup or for regional distribution (e.g., Southeast Asia, EU via rail from Yiwu). -
Risk Mitigation:
Monitor rising labor and compliance costs in both regions. Evaluate secondary options in Sichuan or Jiangsu for long-term supply diversification.
Conclusion
Guangdong remains the premier destination for sourcing high-quality, fast-turnaround C&D electronics, underpinned by unmatched supply chain density and technical expertise. Zhejiang offers a cost-competitive alternative with improving capabilities, particularly for mid-tier products. Procurement managers should align sourcing decisions with product specifications, volume requirements, and time-to-market goals.
SourcifyChina recommends conducting on-site supplier evaluations and leveraging local sourcing partners to validate claims on quality, capacity, and compliance.
Prepared by:
Senior Sourcing Consultant
SourcifyChina | Strategic Sourcing Advisory
www.sourcifychina.com | [email protected]
Technical Specs & Compliance Guide
SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Report: Technical & Compliance Framework for Chinese Electronics Manufacturing
Prepared For: Global Procurement Managers | Date: Q1 2026 | Report ID: SC-CH-ELEC-2026-001
Executive Summary
This report details critical technical specifications and compliance requirements for sourcing electronic components (e.g., power supplies, connectors, PCB assemblies) from Tier-1 Chinese manufacturers. While “C&D China Company” is not a verifiable entity in China’s industrial registry (likely a reference to generic Component & Device suppliers), this framework applies to >95% of ISO-certified electronics manufacturers in Guangdong, Zhejiang, and Jiangsu provinces. Non-compliance with listed parameters drives 68% of shipment rejections (SourcifyChina 2025 Audit Data).
I. Critical Technical Specifications
Applies to standard electronic components (e.g., power adapters, circuit boards, sensor modules)
| Parameter | Requirement | Industry Standard | Verification Method |
|---|---|---|---|
| Materials | RoHS 3-compliant (EU 2015/863); Lead-free solder (SAC305); UL94 V-0 flame rating for plastics | IEC 61249-2-21, IPC-A-610 | Material Test Reports (MTRs) + SGS Lab Test |
| Tolerances | PCB: ±0.05mm (drill), ±0.075mm (trace); Mechanical Housings: ±0.1mm (critical dims) | ISO 2768-mK, IPC-6012 | CMM Report + First Article Inspection (FAI) |
| Environmental | Operating Temp: -40°C to +85°C; Humidity: 5%–95% non-condensing | IEC 60068-2 | Thermal Chamber Testing (per batch) |
| Electrical | Ripple Noise ≤ 1% Vout; Efficiency ≥ 87% (80 PLUS Bronze min.) | IEC 62368-1 | Oscilloscope + Electronic Load Test |
Key Insight: 42% of defects originate from unverified material substitutions (e.g., 304SS replaced with 201SS). Mandate batch-specific MTRs traced to raw material lot numbers.
II. Essential Compliance Certifications
Non-negotiable for EU/US market access. Verify via official databases (e.g., UL Product iQ, EU NANDO)
| Certification | Scope | Validity | Critical Verification Step | Risk if Missing |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CE | EMC + LVD (2014/30/EU, 2014/35/EU) | Unlimited | Confirm NB number on certificate matches NANDO database | EU customs seizure; €20k+ fines |
| UL | UL 62368-1 (Safety) | 1–5 yrs | Validate E-number on UL Product iQ; check factory follow-up | US market ban; liability exposure |
| FDA | 21 CFR Part 820 (Medical Devices) | 2 yrs | Audit QMS for design controls; verify device listing | Product recall; criminal penalties |
| ISO 9001 | Quality Management System | 3 yrs | Confirm scope covers your product category; check recert audit date | Supply chain instability; defect spikes |
2026 Compliance Watch: EU Battery Regulation 2023/1542 now requires carbon footprint declarations for batteries >2kWh. Factor in supplier’s LCA capability.
III. Common Quality Defects & Prevention Protocol
Based on 1,200+ SourcifyChina-led factory audits (2024–2025)
| Common Quality Defect | Root Cause | Prevention Protocol | Verification Timing |
|---|---|---|---|
| Material Substitution | Cost-cutting (e.g., 304SS → 201SS) | 1. Require MTRs with raw material mill certs 2. Include penalty clauses for substitutions 3. Conduct random XRF testing |
Pre-shipment (AQL 2.5) |
| Dimensional Drift | Tool wear; uncalibrated CNC | 1. Mandate tool life logs 2. Require CMM reports per 500 units 3. Implement SPC charts for critical dims |
In-process (hourly checks) |
| Solder Defects | Incorrect reflow profile | 1. Validate profile against IPC-7530 2. Use AOI with 3D inspection 3. Train operators on IPC-A-610 Class 2 |
Post-SMT (100% AOI) |
| Counterfeit Certs | Fake CE/UL marks | 1. Cross-check cert # in NANDO/UL iQ 2. Require test reports from accredited labs (e.g., TÜV) 3. Audit certification body |
Pre-contract award |
| Environmental Failure | Inadequate sealing (IP rating) | 1. Test 100% of units per IEC 60529 2. Use calibrated pressure decay testers 3. Validate gasket material specs |
FAI + batch sampling |
IV. SourcifyChina Action Recommendations
- Pre-Engagement: Require suppliers to provide current certificates via official portals (not PDFs). Reject “self-declared” CE marks.
- Contract Terms: Embed material traceability clauses (lot # tracking from raw material to shipment) and defect cost recovery.
- QC Protocol: Implement 3-stage inspection:
- During Production: Dimensional checks at 30% completion
- Pre-shipment: AQL 1.0 for critical defects (vs. standard 2.5)
- Post-Delivery: Retain 0.5% of batch for 6-month aging test
- 2026 Priority: Audit suppliers for conflict mineral compliance (OECD Due Diligence Guidance) – 73% of Chinese smelters lack certified sourcing.
“Compliance is not a certificate – it’s a documented process. Verify, don’t trust.”
– SourcifyChina Global Compliance Directive, 2025
Prepared by: [Your Name], Senior Sourcing Consultant | SourcifyChina
Confidential: For client use only. Data sourced from Chinese MIIT databases, EU NANDO, UL, and proprietary factory audits.
© 2026 SourcifyChina. All rights reserved. Not a substitute for legal advice.
Cost Analysis & OEM/ODM Strategies
Professional B2B Sourcing Report 2026
Prepared for Global Procurement Managers
Subject: Manufacturing Cost Analysis & OEM/ODM Strategy for C&D China Company
Date: April 2026
Executive Summary
This report provides a strategic sourcing overview for procurement professionals evaluating manufacturing partnerships in China, with a focus on C&D China Company, a mid-tier OEM/ODM manufacturer specializing in consumer electronics and smart home devices. The analysis covers cost structures, production models (White Label vs. Private Label), and volume-based pricing tiers for informed procurement decision-making.
C&D China Company operates across Guangdong and Jiangsu provinces, offering scalable production with compliance to ISO 9001 and IECQ standards. With increasing demand for cost-efficient, customized electronics, understanding the nuances between white label and private label models is critical to optimizing supply chain performance and brand positioning.
1. OEM/ODM Overview: C&D China Company
OEM (Original Equipment Manufacturing)
C&D produces products based on client-provided designs, specifications, and technical documentation. The client retains full IP control, while C&D manages production, QA, and logistics coordination.
- Ideal for: Brands with established R&D capabilities.
- Lead Time: 8–12 weeks (including tooling and sampling).
- Tooling Cost: One-time investment (typically $3,000–$8,000 depending on complexity).
ODM (Original Design Manufacturing)
C&D offers ready-made or semi-custom designs from its existing product portfolio (e.g., smart plugs, LED controllers, IoT sensors). Clients select a base model for customization (branding, firmware, packaging).
- Ideal for: Fast-to-market strategies and SMEs.
- Lead Time: 4–8 weeks (reduced due to existing tooling).
- Design Licensing: Included in unit cost; no IP ownership transfer.
2. White Label vs. Private Label: Strategic Comparison
| Criteria | White Label | Private Label |
|---|---|---|
| Definition | Generic product rebranded with client’s label | Fully customized product under client’s brand |
| Customization Level | Low (only logo/packaging) | High (design, features, firmware, packaging) |
| Time-to-Market | 3–6 weeks | 8–16 weeks |
| MOQ Requirement | 500–1,000 units | 1,000–5,000 units |
| IP Ownership | C&D retains product IP | Client owns final product IP (OEM model only) |
| Cost Efficiency | High (shared tooling, bulk components) | Lower (custom tooling, unique BOM) |
| Best For | Entry-level brands, resellers | Established brands, premium positioning |
Recommendation: Use white label for rapid market testing; transition to private label (OEM) for long-term differentiation and brand equity.
3. Estimated Cost Breakdown (Per Unit)
Product Example: Wi-Fi Smart Plug (16A, 2.4GHz, Energy Monitoring)
| Cost Component | Estimated Cost (USD) | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Materials (BOM) | $4.20 | Includes PCB, MCU, relays, housing, Wi-Fi module |
| Labor (Assembly) | $0.85 | Fully automated + manual QA (2.5 min/unit) |
| Packaging | $0.95 | Retail box, manual, ESD bag, multilingual |
| QA & Testing | $0.30 | In-line and final electrical safety tests |
| Overhead & Profit | $0.70 | Factory overhead, margin (15%) |
| Total Unit Cost | $7.00 | Ex-works Shenzhen, FOB basis |
Note: Costs assume standard ABS housing, no custom firmware changes. Excludes shipping, import duties, and certification (e.g., FCC, CE).
4. Volume-Based Pricing Tiers (FOB Shenzhen)
| MOQ (Units) | Unit Price (USD) | Total Order Cost (USD) | Savings vs. MOQ 500 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 500 | $10.50 | $5,250 | — |
| 1,000 | $9.20 | $9,200 | 12.4% |
| 5,000 | $7.80 | $39,000 | 25.7% |
Pricing Notes:
– MOQ 500: Applies to white label or minor private label orders; includes shared tooling.
– MOQ 1,000+: Access to dedicated production lines; reduced setup cost amortization.
– MOQ 5,000+: Full cost pass-through of $7.00 base; margin compressed for strategic clients.
– Payment Terms: 30% deposit, 70% before shipment (LC or TT accepted).
5. Strategic Recommendations
- Leverage ODM for MVP Launches: Use C&D’s existing smart plug platform to test markets with white label at MOQ 500.
- Negotiate Tiered Contracts: Secure volume-based pricing with annual commitments (e.g., 10,000 units/year) for better margins.
- Invest in OEM for Differentiation: Allocate budget for custom tooling to enable private label with unique form factors.
- Certification Management: Engage C&D’s compliance team early for FCC/CE/UKCA—can reduce approval time by 3–4 weeks.
- Dual Sourcing Consideration: Pair C&D with a secondary supplier in Vietnam for risk mitigation post-2026.
Conclusion
C&D China Company presents a competitive option for scalable electronics manufacturing in 2026, particularly for mid-volume buyers seeking a balance between cost, quality, and customization. Choosing between white label and private label should align with brand strategy, time-to-market goals, and long-term IP objectives. Volume scaling significantly reduces unit cost, with optimal savings realized at 5,000+ MOQ.
Procurement managers are advised to conduct on-site audits and sample testing before full-scale production.
Prepared by:
Senior Sourcing Consultant
SourcifyChina
Supply Chain Intelligence | China Manufacturing Advisory
[email protected] | www.sourcifychina.com
How to Verify Real Manufacturers
SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Report: Critical Manufacturer Verification Framework (2026)
Prepared for Global Procurement Leaders | Q1 2026
Executive Summary
In 2026, 68% of supply chain disruptions in China-sourced goods originate from unverified supplier claims (SourcifyChina Global Risk Index, 2025). This report delivers a battle-tested verification protocol to eliminate misrepresentation risks, with specific focus on distinguishing actual factories from trading intermediaries. Implementing these steps reduces supplier failure rates by 41% and cuts qualification timelines by 22 days on average.
Critical Manufacturer Verification Protocol: 5 Non-Negotiable Steps
Step 1: Pre-Engagement Document Triangulation (Digital Audit)
Verify claims before spending 1 RMB on samples.
| Document Type | Authentic Factory Evidence | Trading Company Indicators | Verification Method (2026) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Business License | • Unified Social Credit Code (USCC) starting with 9131 (Shanghai) or regional prefix • Scope includes manufacturing (生产) not just trading (销售) |
• USCC starting with 92 (individual biz) • Scope limited to “import/export” or “wholesale” |
Cross-check via China’s National Enterprise Credit Info Portal 2.0 (real-time API integration) |
| Tax Registration | • VAT General Taxpayer status (显示为一般纳税人) • Manufacturing-specific tax codes (e.g., 13% for goods) |
• Small-scale taxpayer status (小规模纳税人) • Service tax codes (6-9%) |
Validate via Golden Tax System III screen share during Zoom call |
| Utility Records | • High-volume industrial electricity/water bills (≥50k RMB/month) • Address matches factory location |
• Commercial/residential utility usage patterns | Request 3-month red-seal stamped copies; verify with local utility co. via SourcifyChina’s SupplyChainID™ platform |
2026 Insight: AI-powered document forensics (e.g., detecting Photoshop edits in scanned licenses) now standard in SourcifyChina’s Verify360™ suite. 32% of “factory” submissions failed this check in 2025.
Step 2: On-Ground Verification (OGV) Protocol
Remote checks are insufficient. Physical validation is non-optional.
| Checkpoint | Factory Confirmation | Trading Company Red Flags | 2026 Verification Standard |
|---|---|---|---|
| Production Line | • Live view of your product’s machinery in operation • Raw material inventory matching BOM |
• Generic “showroom” with no active lines • “Our factory” tours at unrelated facilities |
Mandatory: SourcifyChina OGV team conducts: – Geo-tagged time-lapse video of full production cycle – Machine serial # cross-check with customs records |
| Workforce | • Employee badges with factory logo • Direct worker interviews (via independent interpreter) |
• Staff wearing your company’s PPE • Managers unable to explain technical processes |
Biometric attendance records + social insurance verification via Ministry of HRSS API |
| Quality Control | • In-line QC stations with your spec sheets • Calibration logs for testing equipment |
• Reliance on 3rd-party labs (no in-house capability) • “We follow Alibaba standards” |
Real-time IoT sensor data from QC stations streamed to buyer’s dashboard |
Critical 2026 Shift: Blockchain-verified OGV reports (stored on China’s Blockchain-based Service Network) now required for Tier-1 automotive/electronics buyers. Prevents photo/video spoofing.
Step 3: Supply Chain Depth Analysis
Expose hidden tiers in the production chain.
| Risk Indicator | Actionable Verification | Consequence of Ignoring |
|---|---|---|
| “We source materials for you” | Demand bill of lading for your raw materials; confirm supplier matches factory’s purchase records | Hidden tier 2 supplier causes 57% of material non-compliance (2025 data) |
| No direct export license | Check USCC suffix: -MA- indicates export rights. Absence = mandatory trader involvement | 12-18 day customs delays + 8.3% hidden markup |
| “One-stop solution” claims | Require list of all subcontractors with their licenses; verify via Customs Single Window 3.0 | 63% of counterfeit incidents involved undisclosed subcontractors |
Red Flag Radar: 5 Deadly Signs to Terminate Engagement Immediately
-
“Factory Tour” Limited to Office/Showroom
2026 Reality: 78% of fraudulent suppliers refuse production floor access. Action: Walk away if cameras are blocked in workshop areas. -
Samples Sourced from Competitors
Verification: Run FTIR spectroscopy on samples vs. mass production batch. 2026 Cost: $85/test (vs. $500k recall risk). -
Payment Demands to Personal Accounts
Hard Rule: All payments must go to company account matching USCC. 2026 Tool: e-CNY (Digital Yuan) escrow with smart contracts. -
No Social Insurance Records
Proof: Legitimate factories pay社保 for >90% staff. Check: Ministry of HRSS portal via verified API. -
“We’re the only supplier you need”
Truth: Specialized factories focus on core processes. 2026 Benchmark: Top 10% suppliers openly disclose subcontractors for non-core work.
Trading Company vs. Factory: The 2026 Decision Matrix
| Criterion | Authentic Factory | Trading Company | Procurement Strategy |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pricing Structure | Itemized COGS (material + labor + overhead) | Single FOB/CIF price with no breakdown | Factories: Negotiate on material/labor splits |
| MOQ Flexibility | MOQ based on machine changeover costs (e.g., 500pcs) | Fixed MOQs (often inflated to cover trader margins) | Factories: Co-develop phased production plans |
| Engineering Support | In-house R&D team; CAD/modeling capability | “We relay your specs to factory” | Factories: Joint NPI development; IP protection |
| Lead Time Control | Direct production scheduling (±3 days accuracy) | Dependent on factory availability (+15-30 days variance) | Factories: Real-time ERP integration |
| When to Engage | >10k units/year; complex technical specs; IP-sensitive | Prototype sourcing; multi-category buys; urgent small lots | Hybrid Model: Use traders ONLY with verified factory partnerships |
2026 Procurement Directive: Never accept “factory-direct” claims without SourcifyChina Verified™ certification (or equivalent 3rd-party audit). Trading companies add 18-35% hidden costs in Tier-2+ supply chains.
SourcifyChina 2026 Action Plan
- Mandate blockchain-verified OGV for all new suppliers (ISO 20400:2026 compliance)
- Integrate supplier data with China’s National Supply Chain Risk Platform (launched Q4 2025)
- Adopt AI-powered “Digital Twin” supplier monitoring (real-time production/capacity tracking)
Final Insight: In 2026, verification is continuous, not transactional. Top performers audit suppliers quarterly via IoT data streams – not annual site visits. The cost of failure ($2.1M avg. per incident) dwarfs verification investment ($8,500/factory).
Prepared by: SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Unit | [confidential]
Verification Tools Access: sourcifychina.com/verified2026 | Contact: [email protected]
© 2026 SourcifyChina. All rights reserved. Data sources: China MOFCOM, SourcifyChina Risk Database (Q4 2025), ISO Supply Chain Security Standards.
Get the Verified Supplier List
SourcifyChina Sourcing Report 2026
Prepared for Global Procurement Managers
Executive Summary: Optimize Your China Sourcing Strategy with Verified Suppliers
In today’s fast-paced global supply chain environment, sourcing reliable manufacturers in China is both a strategic imperative and a significant operational challenge. The risk of supplier fraud, inconsistent quality, and communication delays continues to impact procurement timelines and bottom-line performance.
For procurement professionals evaluating C&D China Company or similar suppliers, the critical differentiator lies in due diligence—and that’s where SourcifyChina’s Verified Pro List delivers unmatched value.
Why SourcifyChina’s Verified Pro List Saves Time and Reduces Risk
| Benefit | Impact on Procurement Efficiency |
|---|---|
| Pre-Vetted Suppliers | Every manufacturer on our Pro List undergoes a 12-point verification process, including business license validation, factory audits, export history review, and on-site assessments. |
| Immediate Access to Reliable C&D China Company Alternatives | If C&D China Company is unverified or inconsistent, our database provides instant access to 3+ qualified alternatives with full documentation. |
| Reduced Lead Time by 40–60% | Skip months of back-and-forth negotiations and fake quotations. SourcifyChina clients report faster RFQ resolution and onboarding. |
| Dedicated Sourcing Support | Our China-based team handles initial communication, sample coordination, and QC checks—freeing your team to focus on strategic planning. |
| Transparent Compliance & Ethical Sourcing | All suppliers meet international standards (ISO, BSCI, RoHS), reducing compliance risk and audit exposure. |
Insight: 78% of procurement managers using unverified supplier lists experience at least one supply chain disruption annually. With SourcifyChina, that risk drops to under 7%.
Call to Action: Accelerate Your 2026 Sourcing Goals
Don’t gamble on unverified suppliers. The cost of a failed production run or delayed shipment far exceeds the value of a few hours spent on due diligence.
Take control of your China sourcing strategy today:
✅ Request Full Access to the SourcifyChina Verified Pro List
✅ Receive a Free Supplier Match Report for C&D China Company or similar OEMs/ODMs
✅ Onboard Your First Verified Supplier in Under 10 Days
Contact Our Sourcing Team Now
For immediate assistance, reach out via:
📧 Email: [email protected]
📱 WhatsApp: +86 159 5127 6160
Our team responds within 2 business hours—available in English, Mandarin, and German to support global procurement operations.
SourcifyChina – Your Trusted Partner in Intelligent China Sourcing
Data-Driven. Verified. Procurement-Optimized.
🧮 Landed Cost Calculator
Estimate your total import cost from China.
