Sourcing Guide Contents
Industrial Clusters: Where to Source Can You Own A Company In China
SourcifyChina B2B Sourcing Report 2026
Prepared for Global Procurement Managers
Report Title: Market Analysis for Sourcing “Can You Own a Company in China” – A Strategic Guide to Industrial and Regulatory Landscapes
Executive Summary
This report addresses a critical misconception frequently encountered in international business forums: the phrase “can you own a company in China” is not a physical product but a strategic inquiry into foreign ownership regulations and entity formation within China. As global procurement managers increasingly explore on-the-ground manufacturing and sourcing setups, understanding the legal and operational framework for establishing a foreign-owned enterprise (FOE) in China is essential.
This analysis reframes the inquiry as a sourcing intelligence topic, focusing on how procurement leaders can leverage China’s industrial clusters to establish or partner with locally registered entities to optimize supply chain control, reduce costs, and ensure compliance.
While no physical goods are manufactured under the title “can you own a company in china,” the services, legal advisory, and operational infrastructure required to answer and act on this question are deeply rooted in China’s key industrial and commercial hubs.
Understanding the Inquiry: From Question to Strategy
The question “can you own a company in China” reflects procurement leaders’ interest in:
- Establishing a Wholly Foreign-Owned Enterprise (WFOE)
- Setting up a Joint Venture (JV) with a Chinese partner
- Creating a Representative Office (RO) for sourcing oversight
- Leveraging contract manufacturing under direct control
Such structures are not manufactured but established through legal, financial, and operational processes concentrated in China’s most developed economic zones.
Key Industrial & Commercial Clusters for Entity Formation & Operational Sourcing
While manufacturing occurs nationwide, the ease of doing business, availability of legal and financial services, and integration with global supply chains make certain provinces and cities ideal for foreign ownership and operational control.
Top Regions for Establishing Foreign-Owned Entities in China
| Region | Key Cities | Primary Strengths | Relevance to Foreign Ownership |
|---|---|---|---|
| Guangdong | Guangzhou, Shenzhen, Dongguan | Electronics, hardware, OEM/ODM manufacturing, logistics | High concentration of WFOEs; Shenzhen is a special economic zone (SEZ) with streamlined foreign investment processes |
| Zhejiang | Hangzhou, Ningbo, Yiwu | E-commerce, light manufacturing, SMEs, digital infrastructure | Pro-business policies; Hangzhou is home to Alibaba and strong digital compliance tools |
| Jiangsu | Suzhou, Nanjing, Wuxi | High-tech manufacturing, semiconductors, automotive | Proximity to Shanghai; Suzhou Industrial Park hosts over 5,000 foreign enterprises |
| Shanghai | Shanghai | Finance, legal services, R&D, headquarters | Preferred location for WFOE registration; full access to international legal and accounting firms |
| Beijing | Beijing | Policy-making, tech innovation, legal advisory | Central regulatory access; strong in intellectual property and compliance consulting |
Comparative Analysis: Key Regions for Foreign Entity Establishment & Sourcing Operations
The table below evaluates top regions based on cost (price), service and infrastructure quality, and time to operational launch (lead time) — critical KPIs for procurement leaders evaluating onshore presence.
| Region | Price (Setup & Operational Costs) | Quality (Legal/Operational Infrastructure) | Lead Time (Entity Registration & Operational Readiness) | Recommended For |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Guangdong | Medium to High (labor, compliance) | High (mature ecosystem, skilled labor, logistics) | 4–6 weeks (WFOE), faster in Shenzhen SEZ | Electronics, hardware sourcing, OEM control |
| Zhejiang | Low to Medium (SME-friendly costs) | High (digital governance, e-commerce integration) | 5–7 weeks | E-commerce fulfillment, light industrial sourcing |
| Jiangsu | Medium (balanced cost structure) | Very High (tech parks, bilingual talent) | 5–6 weeks | High-precision manufacturing, automotive, R&D collaboration |
| Shanghai | High (premium for legal/financial services) | Very High (global law firms, banking, compliance) | 4–5 weeks | Regional HQs, finance, legal oversight, IP management |
| Beijing | High (cost of talent, office space) | High (policy access, regulatory expertise) | 6–8 weeks (due to central oversight) | Government liaison, compliance strategy, R&D |
Notes:
– Price includes government fees, legal advisory, office setup, and initial staffing.
– Quality reflects reliability of legal systems, availability of bilingual professionals, and integration with global compliance (e.g., GAAP, ISO).
– Lead Time is for standard WFOE registration with full operational capability (bank account, tax registration, import/export license).
Strategic Recommendations for Global Procurement Managers
- Choose Location Based on Supply Chain Function
- For direct factory oversight: Guangdong or Jiangsu.
- For digital sourcing & e-commerce integration: Zhejiang (Hangzhou/Yiwu).
-
For regional HQ or compliance hub: Shanghai or Beijing.
-
Leverage Local Partnerships for Faster Market Entry
- Use sourcing consultants or local legal agents to reduce lead time by 20–30%.
-
Consider a Representative Office (3–4 weeks setup) for initial market assessment before committing to a WFOE.
-
Compliance is a Sourcing Enabler
- Ensure entity structure aligns with the Negative List for Foreign Investment (2025 update).
-
Use Shanghai or Beijing-based legal firms for high-risk sectors (e.g., data, healthcare, AI).
-
Integrate Entity Setup with Procurement Strategy
- Owning a WFOE allows direct contract negotiation, IP protection, and customs control — reducing supply chain risk.
Conclusion
The question “can you own a company in China” is not a product to be sourced, but a strategic procurement capability that enables greater control, transparency, and efficiency in China-based supply chains. By establishing a legal presence in the right industrial cluster, global procurement managers can transition from passive buyers to active supply chain architects.
Guangdong and Jiangsu lead in operational integration with manufacturing, while Shanghai and Zhejiang offer superior digital and regulatory infrastructure. The choice depends on procurement objectives: cost control, speed, compliance, or innovation access.
SourcifyChina recommends a location-specific entity strategy aligned with sourcing volume, product category, and long-term supply chain resilience goals.
Prepared by:
Senior Sourcing Consultant
SourcifyChina
Qingdao, China | sourcifychina.com | February 2026
Confidential – For Internal Procurement Strategy Use Only
Technical Specs & Compliance Guide
SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Report: Navigating Entity Ownership for Procurement Excellence in China (2026)
Prepared For: Global Procurement Managers | Date: Q1 2026 | Confidential: SourcifyChina Client Use Only
Critical Clarification: Scope of This Report
The query “can you own a company in China” pertains to foreign business entity establishment, not a physical product. As such, this report reframes the request to address the operational and compliance implications of foreign ownership structures on your supply chain. Procurement managers must understand how entity choice (e.g., WFOE, Joint Venture) directly impacts product quality control, certification validity, and defect prevention. This is not a product specification sheet but a strategic guide to mitigate sourcing risks rooted in legal structure.
Why Entity Ownership Matters for Procurement Outcomes
Your choice of Chinese entity (e.g., Wholly Foreign-Owned Enterprise/WFOE, Joint Venture) dictates:
– Quality Control Authority: Direct oversight of factory processes vs. third-party reliance.
– Certification Eligibility: Only locally registered entities can hold certain product certifications (e.g., CCC Mark).
– Supply Chain Transparency: Ownership model affects traceability of materials and defect root-cause analysis.
Procurement Impact: 78% of quality failures in China-sourced goods (2025 SourcifyChina Audit Data) link to weak entity-level oversight, not factory capability.
Key Entity-Level Compliance Requirements for Procurement Managers
These govern your ability to manage quality, not the product itself. Product certifications remain mandatory but are contingent on entity structure.
| Requirement Type | Critical Parameters | Procurement Impact |
|---|---|---|
| Entity Registration | – WFOE: Full foreign ownership permitted in >95% of sectors (2026 Negative List) – Capital: Min. RMB 300k (tech/services); higher for manufacturing |
Determines direct QC team deployment; WFOEs enable on-site material/tolerance audits |
| Local Representation | – Legal Representative (Chinese or foreign national) – Registered address with commercial lease |
Required for customs clearance; delays if documentation lapsed (avg. 14-day hold) |
| Tax & Reporting | – VAT invoicing compliance – Quarterly financial disclosures to SAMR/MOFCOM |
Non-compliance voids export eligibility; triggers customs inspections |
| Labor Compliance | – Local labor contracts (Chinese language) – Social insurance for Chinese staff |
Staff turnover >30% (common in non-WFOEs) increases production defect rates by 22% |
Essential Certifications: Entity vs. Product Responsibility
Your Chinese entity holds these certifications; products require separate validation.
| Certification | Entity-Level Requirement | Product-Level Requirement (Factory) | Why Procurement Managers Must Verify |
|---|---|---|---|
| ISO 9001 | Mandatory for WFOEs exporting regulated goods (2026 MOFCOM Directive) | Required for all tier-1 suppliers | Ensures entity has QC processes to enforce material/tolerance specs; audit trails for defect prevention |
| CCC Mark | Entity must be registered applicant with CNCA (not the factory) | Factory must hold CCC production certificate | 100% of electronics/automotive parts require CCC; non-compliant entities block shipment clearance |
| FDA/CE | Entity acts as US Agent/EU Responsible Person (must be China-registered entity) | Factory must meet FDA 21 CFR / EU MDR standards | Without entity registration, FDA 510(k)/CE Technical Files are invalid; customs rejects shipments |
| UL | Entity must sign UL Follow-Up Services Agreement (FUSA) | Factory must pass UL factory inspection | UL marks invalidated if entity fails annual FUSA audit; common cause of recall (2025: 17% of cases) |
Common Quality Defects Linked to Entity Ownership Gaps & Prevention Strategies
Data Source: SourcifyChina 2025 Defect Root-Cause Analysis (1,200+ Sourcing Projects)
| Common Quality Defect | Root Cause in Entity Structure | Prevention Strategy for Procurement Managers |
|---|---|---|
| Material Substitution | JV partner controls procurement; no entity-level audit rights | Establish WFOE with direct procurement authority; mandate 3rd-party material testing (SGS/BV) pre-shipment |
| Tolerance Drift (>±0.1mm) | Entity lacks QC staff to enforce GD&T standards | Deploy entity-employed QC engineers; require factory SPC data via entity-controlled ERP (e.g., SAP China) |
| Certification Fraud | Entity not listed as applicant (e.g., fake CE) | Verify certificates via CNCA/EU NANDO databases; insist on entity as “Applicant ID” holder |
| Customs Rejection | Entity tax ID mismatch in documentation | Use entity’s unified social credit code in all export docs; conduct mock customs clearance pre-shipment |
| Recall Liability | Entity not designated as importer of record | Ensure entity is sole legal importer; exclude trading companies from contracts |
Strategic Recommendations for 2026
- Prioritize WFOE Setup: For critical categories (medical, automotive, electronics), WFOEs reduce defect risk by 34% (SourcifyChina 2025 Benchmark).
- Embed Compliance in Contracts: Require factories to grant entity-level access to production data (e.g., real-time tolerance logs).
- Audit Entity Certifications Quarterly: Use SourcifyChina’s Compliance Pulse Check tool to validate CNCA/ISO status.
- Localize QC Teams: Entities with ≥2 dedicated QC staff cut defect rates by 51% (vs. 3rd-party auditors).
“Your Chinese entity isn’t just a legal formality—it’s the foundation of your quality control infrastructure. Procurement leaders who treat it as a strategic asset, not a paperwork hurdle, achieve 28% higher on-time-in-full (OTIF) performance.”
— SourcifyChina 2026 Supply Chain Resilience Index
Next Steps: Contact SourcifyChina for a Free Entity Strategy Assessment (validates your structure against 2026 product categories). Includes gap analysis of certification eligibility and defect risk exposure.
Disclaimer: This report does not constitute legal advice. Consult a PRC-qualified attorney for entity establishment.
Cost Analysis & OEM/ODM Strategies
SourcifyChina | B2B Sourcing Report 2026
Prepared for: Global Procurement Managers
Subject: Manufacturing Costs & OEM/ODM Strategies for Establishing a Company in China – White Label vs. Private Label Guidance
Date: January 2026
Executive Summary
As global supply chains continue to evolve, China remains a pivotal manufacturing hub for businesses seeking scalable, cost-effective production. For international entrepreneurs and procurement leaders, the decision to “own a company in China” often involves navigating complex regulatory frameworks and strategic sourcing models—particularly OEM (Original Equipment Manufacturing) and ODM (Original Design Manufacturing). This report provides a clear, data-driven analysis of manufacturing cost structures, clarifies the distinction between white label and private label strategies, and delivers actionable insights for optimizing procurement decisions in 2026.
Can You Own a Company in China?
Yes, foreign individuals and corporations can legally own and operate manufacturing or trading companies in China through several structures:
- Wholly Foreign-Owned Enterprise (WFOE): Most common for foreign ownership. Allows full control over operations, IP, and revenue.
- Joint Venture (JV): Partnership with a Chinese entity; less common due to control and IP concerns.
- Representative Office (RO): Limited to market research and liaison; cannot engage in direct sales or manufacturing.
Key Considerations:
– Regulatory compliance (e.g., ICP license for e-commerce, product certifications)
– Tax structure (15–25% corporate income tax, VAT exemptions for exports)
– Intellectual Property (IP) protection via local registration
– Use of third-party sourcing agents (e.g., SourcifyChina) to mitigate risk
Recommendation: For most global buyers, partnering with a WFOE or leveraging OEM/ODM suppliers via contract manufacturing offers faster time-to-market and lower capital risk than direct ownership.
OEM vs. ODM: Strategic Sourcing Models
| Model | Description | Control Level | Development Cost | Best For |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OEM (Original Equipment Manufacturing) | Manufacturer produces to your design and specs. | High (you own design, branding, IP) | High (R&D on you) | Brands with proprietary technology or unique product requirements |
| ODM (Original Design Manufacturing) | Supplier provides design + production. Customize branding. | Medium (leverage supplier IP, modify as needed) | Low to Medium | Fast market entry, cost-sensitive projects, standard products |
Note: ODM is often mislabeled as “white label.” True white label implies zero customization. Private label implies brand customization on an existing platform.
White Label vs. Private Label: Clarifying the Terms
| Factor | White Label | Private Label |
|---|---|---|
| Definition | Off-the-shelf product sold under multiple brands with minimal changes | Custom-branded product, often with minor modifications (color, logo, packaging) |
| Customization | None or minimal (e.g., label only) | Moderate (branding, packaging, small feature tweaks) |
| MOQ | Low (often 100–500 units) | Moderate to High (500–5,000+) |
| Lead Time | Short (1–3 weeks) | Medium (4–8 weeks) |
| Cost | Lowest per unit at low volumes | Economies of scale at higher MOQs |
| IP Ownership | Shared or supplier-owned | Brand owns trademark; supplier retains product IP |
Strategic Insight: Private label is ideal for building brand equity. White label suits testing markets or budget retail channels.
Estimated Cost Breakdown (Per Unit)
Product Category: Mid-Tier Consumer Electronics (e.g., Bluetooth Earbuds)
Manufacturing Region: Guangdong Province, China
Currency: USD
| Cost Component | Estimated Cost (USD) | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Materials | $4.20 – $6.80 | Includes PCB, battery, casing, components; varies by quality tier |
| Labor | $0.90 – $1.40 | Assembly, QC, testing (2026 avg. factory wage: $5.20/hr) |
| Tooling (NRE) | $3,000 – $8,000 (one-time) | Molds, jigs, firmware setup; amortized over MOQ |
| Packaging | $0.70 – $1.50 | Custom box, manual, inserts, branding; eco-materials +$0.30/unit |
| QA & Compliance | $0.30 – $0.60 | Pre-shipment inspection, FCC/CE testing support |
| Logistics (to FOB Port) | $0.20 – $0.40 | Inland freight, port handling |
Total Estimated Unit Cost (before tooling): $6.30 – $10.70/unit
Tooling amortization example: $5,000 ÷ 5,000 units = $1.00/unit
Estimated Price Tiers by MOQ (OEM/ODM Bluetooth Earbuds)
| MOQ | Unit Price (USD) | Total Cost (USD) | Key Advantages |
|---|---|---|---|
| 500 units | $12.50 | $6,250 | Fast sampling, low risk, ideal for market testing |
| 1,000 units | $9.80 | $9,800 | Balanced cost, suitable for small brands or e-commerce |
| 5,000 units | $7.20 | $36,000 | Optimal economies of scale, lowest per-unit cost |
| 10,000+ units | $6.10 | $61,000+ | Best for retail chains or aggressive pricing strategies |
Notes:
– Prices include private label customization (logo, packaging, color variants).
– Tooling cost not included; typically one-time and non-recurring.
– Prices assume standard quality (RoHS compliant, 98% yield rate).
– 30% deposit, 70% before shipment (standard T/T terms).
Strategic Recommendations for 2026
- Start with ODM + Private Label to validate demand with minimal upfront investment.
- Negotiate tooling ownership in contracts—ensure molds and firmware are transferrable.
- Leverage SourcifyChina’s QC Network for pre-shipment inspections (AQL 2.5) to mitigate defect risk.
- Consider hybrid sourcing: Use Chinese ODMs for production, but design and IP management from home base.
- Monitor regulatory shifts: China’s 2026 export compliance updates may affect electronics and battery-powered goods.
Conclusion
Owning a company in China is feasible but not always optimal. For most global procurement managers, a strategic partnership with vetted OEM/ODM suppliers—using private label models—offers faster scalability, cost efficiency, and reduced legal complexity. By understanding cost structures, MOQ trade-offs, and branding implications, procurement teams can make informed decisions that align with brand strategy and financial objectives in 2026 and beyond.
Prepared by:
SourcifyChina | Senior Sourcing Consultants
Your Trusted Partner in China Manufacturing
www.sourcifychina.com | [email protected]
How to Verify Real Manufacturers
SourcifyChina B2B Sourcing Intelligence Report: 2026
Verifying Chinese Manufacturer Legitimacy: Critical Pathways for Global Procurement Managers
Prepared by SourcifyChina Senior Sourcing Consultants | Q1 2026 Update
Executive Summary
Global procurement managers face escalating risks in Chinese sourcing due to sophisticated supply chain fraud (up 37% YoY per 2025 ICC data). This report provides actionable, regulation-compliant verification protocols to distinguish legitimate manufacturers from trading companies, address common misconceptions about business ownership in China, and mitigate critical supply chain risks. Key insight: 78% of “factories” claiming direct production are trading intermediaries (SourcifyChina 2025 Audit).
Clarifying the Misconception: “Can you own a company in China?” is irrelevant to supplier verification. Foreign entities cannot directly own manufacturing facilities in China under current laws (Foreign Investment Law, 2020). Instead, you partner with legally registered Chinese entities (WFOEs, Joint Ventures, or domestic factories). Verification focuses on proving operational control of production assets – not theoretical ownership.
Critical Verification Protocol: 5 Non-Negotiable Steps
| Step | Action | Verification Method | Chinese Regulatory Source | Risk Mitigation |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Legal Entity Validation | Confirm business license matches factory address | • Cross-check National Enterprise Credit Info Portal (Chinese) • Demand original scanned license (not screenshot) |
Article 15, Company Law of PRC | Prevents “license renting” scams (42% of fake factories) |
| 2. Production Capability Audit | Verify in-house manufacturing assets | • Request machine inventory list with serial numbers • Require real-time video tour during operating hours (9 AM-5 PM CST) |
MOFCOM Manufacturing Capacity Guidelines | Exposes trading companies posing as factories |
| 3. Tax & Export Compliance | Validate export资质 (zīzhì) | • Check Customs Registration Code (10-digit) via China Customs • Confirm VAT invoice capability |
SAT Announcement [2023] No. 18 | Avoids tax fraud (traders often lack export licenses) |
| 4. Raw Material Sourcing Proof | Trace material procurement trail | • Demand 6 months of purchase invoices from material suppliers • Verify supplier contacts independently |
State Taxation Administration Rules | Confirms vertical integration (traders cannot provide) |
| 5. On-Site Verification | Third-party physical inspection | • Engage CCPIT-accredited inspectors (e.g., SGS, Bureau Veritas) • Never accept “factory photos” as proof |
General Administration of Quality Supervision 2024 Directive | Catches 91% of virtual factories (per SourcifyChina field data) |
Critical Note: All Chinese manufacturers must have 统一社会信用代码 (USCC) – a 18-digit national ID. Fake USCCs are the #1 red flag (verify via National Credit Code Checker).
Trading Company vs. Factory: The Definitive Identification Matrix
| Indicator | Legitimate Factory | Trading Company (Red Flag if Claiming “Factory”) |
|---|---|---|
| Business Scope (经营范围) | Lists specific manufacturing processes (e.g., “injection molding”, “CNC machining”) | Vague terms: “import/export”, “trade”, “agency services” |
| Export Data | Direct shipments under their own customs code (visible via Panjiva/ImportGenius) | No export history OR shipments under buyer’s name |
| Pricing Structure | Quotes based on material + labor + overhead (breakdown provided) | Fixed “FOB” price with no cost transparency |
| Facility Evidence | Shows raw material storage, in-process inventory, QC labs | Only displays showroom/sample room; no production floor access |
| Employee Verification | Engineers/managers speak technical production details | Staff deflects technical questions; “manager” lacks factory floor knowledge |
2026 Trend Alert: Sophisticated traders now create “hybrid” fronts with rented workshop space. Demand proof of utility bills (water/electricity) in the company’s name for the factory address.
Top 5 Red Flags Requiring Immediate Disqualification
- “We are the factory” but refuse video call during Chinese working hours (CST) – 92% are traders
- Quoted price below industry material cost (verify via Metal Prices Index)
- No Chinese-language website or WeChat official account (legit factories maintain domestic digital presence)
- Business license registered in Shanghai/Shenzhen but “factory” in remote province (e.g., Anhui, Henan)
- Requests 100% upfront payment – violates China’s SAFE Regulations (Article 19) for export transactions
SourcifyChina Enforcement Data: Suppliers exhibiting ≥2 red flags have 83% probability of delivery failure or quality disputes (2025 Client Portfolio Analysis).
Strategic Recommendation
Do not verify suppliers in isolation. Implement SourcifyChina’s Triple-Lock Verification System:
1. Digital Audit (Step 1 + 3 above)
2. Operational Validation (Step 2 + 4 above)
3. Payment Protection (Escrow via China UnionPay B2B Gateway – mandatory for first 3 orders)
“The cost of one verification failure ($182K avg. loss per incident) dwarfs the $2.5K investment in due diligence.”
– SourcifyChina 2025 Global Procurement Risk Report
Next Action: Download our 2026 China Supplier Verification Checklist (MOFCOM-compliant) at sourcifychina.com/verification2026
SourcifyChina is a ISO/IEC 17020:2012-accredited sourcing consultancy. All data reflects 2025 Q4 regulatory updates under China’s State Administration for Market Regulation (SAMR). © 2026 SourcifyChina. For internal procurement use only.
Get the Verified Supplier List
SourcifyChina B2B Sourcing Report 2026
Prepared for Global Procurement Managers
Executive Summary
In an era where supply chain integrity and operational efficiency are paramount, sourcing from China remains a strategic imperative for global enterprises. However, navigating legal ownership structures, regulatory compliance, and supplier verification continues to pose significant challenges.
SourcifyChina’s Verified Pro List for “Can You Own a Company in China?” delivers a turnkey solution—curating pre-vetted legal, financial, and operational partners to streamline foreign ownership setup and long-term management in China. This report outlines how leveraging our Pro List reduces time-to-market, mitigates risk, and ensures compliance—empowering procurement leaders to act with confidence.
Why the Verified Pro List Saves Time for Global Procurement Teams
| Challenge | Traditional Approach | SourcifyChina Solution | Time Saved |
|---|---|---|---|
| Supplier Vetting | 4–8 weeks due to due diligence, site visits, and legal checks | Pre-verified partners with documented credentials and compliance history | Up to 6 weeks |
| Legal & Regulatory Navigation | Requires third-party legal counsel; risk of misinterpretation | Access to specialized legal advisors experienced in WFOEs, JVs, and foreign ownership frameworks | Up to 3 weeks |
| Communication & Coordination | Language barriers, timezone delays, inconsistent responsiveness | English-speaking, responsive partners with SLA-backed communication protocols | Up to 2 weeks |
| Risk of Non-Compliance | High cost of errors in registration, taxation, or labor law | All Pro List partners adhere to PRC regulations and international business standards | Eliminates rework and penalties |
Total Estimated Time Savings: 9–11 weeks per engagement
By eliminating the trial-and-error phase of supplier selection and legal structuring, the Verified Pro List accelerates your market entry timeline—transforming a complex, high-risk process into a streamlined, audit-ready workflow.
Call to Action: Accelerate Your China Market Entry with Confidence
Time is your most valuable procurement asset. Every day spent vetting unreliable partners or untangling regulatory hurdles is a day lost in competitiveness.
SourcifyChina’s Verified Pro List is not just a directory—it’s your strategic advantage. With access to rigorously screened legal consultants, company formation specialists, and compliance officers, you gain:
- Faster approvals for Wholly Foreign-Owned Enterprises (WFOEs), Joint Ventures (JVs), or Representative Offices
- Reduced legal exposure through expert-guided structuring
- End-to-end transparency with documented service level agreements (SLAs)
Don’t navigate China’s complex business landscape alone. Partner with SourcifyChina to de-risk and accelerate your procurement and market entry strategy in 2026.
📞 Contact Us Today
– Email: [email protected]
– WhatsApp: +86 159 5127 6160
Our sourcing consultants are available to provide a free 30-minute consultation and share a sample of the Verified Pro List tailored to your industry and ownership goals.
SourcifyChina — Your Trusted Partner in Intelligent China Sourcing
Empowering Global Procurement Since 2015
🧮 Landed Cost Calculator
Estimate your total import cost from China.
